YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → Zamach stanu w Polsce! Prokuratura Zabrała Głos! Robi Się Naprawdę Dziwnie! - Analiza Ator

Zamach stanu w Polsce! Prokuratura Zabrała Głos! Robi Się Naprawdę Dziwnie! - Analiza Ator — Transcript

by wideoprezentacje · 11,313 words · 1,788 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00Good morning, everyone. A warm welcome
0:02to today's podcast, seven topics. As
0:04usual, the whole thing will be divided
0:06into two parts. The first part is a
0:09short teaser for each of these topics,
0:11so that you know what to expect in
0:13today's material. And the second part
0:16is a comprehensive discussion of each
0:17of these topics. This is so that you
0:23are comprehensively and thoroughly
0:24informed and, above all, that you have
0:26something to listen to during the
0:28upcoming—or rather, just starting—
0:30day. Topic number one, and this is a
0:36topic I would rather not bring up. But
0:39since reality is playing out this way,
0:41it has to be discussed. I mean, I wish
0:45this would never have taken place in
0:46Poland. The coup d'état in Poland is
0:50getting really strange. The
0:53prosecutor's office is saying some very
0:55odd things. After yesterday's press
1:01conference by the prosecutor's office,
1:03I genuinely feel worried as a Pole
1:04living in Poland. I am convinced that
1:13living in Poland poses an increasing
1:18threat, I would say. Yes, it is
1:21becoming more and more dangerous to
1:23live in Poland. Topic number 2.
1:26Gawkowski threw Tusk under the bus.
1:28Gawkowski is the Deputy Prime Minister
1:30and Minister of Digital Affairs. He
1:35admitted that they can already block
1:37accounts immediately. We are, of course
1:41, talking about people's social media
1:43accounts. If these social media
1:49accounts are used to do anything bad,
1:51that is, if they are already able to
1:53block a social media account
1:54immediately if someone does something
1:56wrong, then what the hell do they need
1:58a new law for? Well, logically, so they
2:07can block those accounts that aren't
2:09doing anything wrong, but which, for
2:11example, tell the inconvenient truth
2:13about Gawkowski being incompetent and
2:15Tusk being even worse. Topic number
2:19three. A Ukrainian caught smuggling
2:22weapons into Poland. Topic number 4.
2:26The Internal Security Agency, or ABW,
2:28brushed off Kołodziejczak. They did
2:32not accept his notification about a
2:34potential crime. They sent the report
2:39elsewhere, meaning Mr. Kołodziejczak
2:42was, sorry, was rejected by the ABW.
2:47This is one of many humiliations he has
2:49suffered recently. Um, well, dear
2:52listeners, the best part was the press
2:55conference of Mr. Kołodziejczak and
2:57Mr. Rutkowski at the Sejm without Mr.
2:59Kołodziejczak, because he didn't make
3:01it, but Mr. Rutkowski did. I'm just
3:04wondering if I should do an analysis of
3:06that conference, because it was, to be
3:08honest, quite something. Truly
3:10something. Well, the detective made an
3:15appeal to drug dealers to turn
3:16themselves in to him. It would be funny
3:21if it weren't true. Can you imagine? If
3:26I were to make such an appeal on a
3:28stream for them to turn themselves in
3:30to me, the anti-narcotics police would
3:32raid my house, and they would be 100%
3:34right. But you know, a great, famous
3:41famous detective, who I don't know if
3:42he ever helped a person who came to him
3:44for help. Alright, sorry. We will
3:53discuss this comprehensively further on
3:55. Now we are finishing the preview.
3:57Topic number 5. Germany is revoking
4:01refugee status for a whole lot of
4:02people. This is an important lesson for
4:09Poland, as I have the impression that
4:11in the near future there will be a "
4:13make or break" moment, meaning they
4:14will either end this sick conflict on
4:16our eastern border or drag Poland into
4:18it. I bet they will end this conflict.
4:29So, when they end this conflict, we
4:30will be left with about 2 million
4:32people from that country who are
4:33sitting here with us and who almost
4:35certainly will want to stay. And our
4:41leaders will ask them: "Does his
4:43lordship the foreigner want to stay
4:45with us, or does he want to return,
4:46since he is not at home after all?"
4:50Therefore, you have full
4:51decision-making power in this matter.
4:53Poles have no say whatsoever. The voice
4:56of Poles does not count. You decide,
4:59sir or madam, whether you are returning
5:01to your country since the armed
5:03conflict is over, or staying, and they
5:04will try to convince us that this is
5:06absolutely normal. Well, Germany—and
5:10I think Führer Tusk respects them—is
5:12proving that no, it is not normal. It
5:15is the hosts who decide who can stay
5:17and who has refugee status. And if
5:20someone does not behave the way they
5:21want, they can lose that status en
5:23masse. And that is something we must
5:26remember for the near future. Topic
5:36number 6. The price of gas has risen by
5:40160%. So if someone was paying, for
5:46example, a 100 PLN gas bill, they will
5:49now be paying 260. And there will be
5:52further price hikes. This will
5:55translate, among other things, into the
5:57price of bread. I realize that for most
6:01of us Poles, the price of gas is not
6:03exciting. Because, like most of us
6:08Poles, if someone uses gas only for
6:11cooking, then if the bill is, I don't
6:13know, 50 PLN, it will now be about 130,
6:16well, a few dozen zlotys more. Yes, but
6:20that is a few dozen zlotys here, a few
6:22dozen zlotys there, and it adds up to a
6:24couple hundred. A couple hundred times
6:2612 months adds up to a couple thousand
6:28zlotys. And that is even if you use
6:30that gas exclusively for cooking.
6:36However, if you use gas to heat your
6:37house because you believed Merkel—and
6:39back then there was Morawiecki and the
6:41rest of those people who even paid
6:43money to replace furnaces with gas ones
6:45—because, after all, gas was supposed
6:47to be ecological and, above all, gas
6:49was supposed to be cheap. Uh, well,
6:55because back then Germany had the idea
6:58to buy cheap gas from Russia and
6:59distribute it across the entire
7:01European Union at a profit, with a
7:03margin, so back then gas was ecological
7:05, right? And the EU even provided
7:10subsidies for gas, for for replacing
7:12boilers, so that there would be the
7:14highest possible demand for this gas.
7:17Yes. Uh, well, if you believed it, uh,
7:21and replaced your boiler with a gas one
7:23, right now your heating bills are
7:25about five or six times higher than
7:27they were, uh, before you replaced it.
7:31So now, if they add more, sorry, mainly
7:33for the house, because while gas
7:35boilers do happen in apartments, they
7:37are primarily in houses. Well then it's
7:42slowly becoming so expensive for a
7:44large portion of people that they can't
7:46afford to heat. The house. If someone,
7:51for example, paid 10,000 PLN for gas
7:54last winter season, now they will pay
7:5726,000. Well, that's a lot of money, it
8:03seems to me. And it will get even more
8:06expensive. Soon people won't be able to
8:08afford to heat their own homes, and
8:10that is a very serious problem. However
8:15, something that affects absolutely
8:17everyone is that, first of all, a
8:19certain portion of electricity comes
8:21from gas in our energy mix, so more
8:22expensive gas means more expensive
8:24electricity, and more expensive
8:26electricity means everything is more
8:28expensive. And second, gas is very
8:35often used in bakeries, so bread will
8:37be more expensive; in restaurants, they
8:39cook with gas, so food in restaurants
8:41will be more expensive. Very often,
8:50buildings that house shops are also
8:52heated with gas. Consequently, retail
8:56margins will be higher. In general,
8:59inflation will kick into full gear, and
9:01we will all have to pay for it. And
9:04ladies and gentlemen, the seventh and
9:06final topic. Iran is threatening a land
9:11invasion, and these are not empty
9:12threats. Iran is emboldened by how a
9:21simple Houthi militia cuts through
9:23Saudi Arabia like butter. A mere
9:29militia, poorly trained, poorly
9:31commanded, poorly equipped. They cut
9:36like butter through the super well-paid
9:38, supposedly super well-trained, and
9:40fantastically armed Saudi Arabian army,
9:42equipped with the most expensive
9:44American gear. Well, basically, they
9:49just go through them like a knife
9:51through butter. So these Houthis have
9:55done something called a reconnaissance
9:56in force. And they determined that
9:58these armies, which, how should I put
10:05it, well stood on petrodollar money,
10:11don't actually know how to fight very
10:13well. And the Iranians know this, who
10:17maybe don't have an army as well-paid
10:19or equipped with such modern American
10:21hardware. But this Iranian equipment
10:25works, and their soldiers want to fight
10:27. And they realized perfectly well that
10:32if they attack their neighbors by land,
10:33they will crush them completely.
10:45Basically, it's about the fact that
10:49Trump threatened that after the
10:51election midterm elections for the
10:58American parliament are coming up soon,
11:00when are the US parliamentary elections
11:02um um November 3rd, that is in two
11:10weeks and a little bit. Well, Trump
11:15announced that after those elections he
11:17will attack Iran and sent a new carrier
11:19strike group. He also sent a new, a new
11:23fleet with Marines on board. Well, so
11:27they are clearly leaning towards an
11:29invasion. They might also drop nukes,
11:31well if I may put it that way no, no
11:43they are not messing around. Yes, they
11:45are not messing around the Americans.
11:48It may well be that it may be that they
11:54want, they are suggesting a land
11:56invasion here, and that nukes will fly.
12:01Either way, Iran says that if there is
12:03another intensified attack on them,
12:04they will march their land army into
12:06the neighbors. And they can actually do
12:09that. That would be a total humiliation
12:11for the United States, but a total one
12:15because they can probably reach an
12:17agreement with Iraq at this point and
12:19create one, one state. Iraq is an
12:22age-old enemy of Iran. But Iraq
12:24effectively no longer exists. This
12:26country is already just a shell. It is
12:30ruled largely by Iranian militias
12:32supported by Iran, so basically
12:34entering Iraq would be an annexation.
12:40And it will be interesting when Iran
12:41starts conquering um neighboring
12:43countries with American bases. And they
12:47can do that, ladies and gentlemen. And
12:51that will be something, I would say,
12:53really damn interesting. Alright, that
12:56was the teaser. We are moving on to a
12:59comprehensive discussion of individual
13:01topics. Ladies and gentlemen, coup
13:10d'état, topic number 1. The coup
13:12d'état in Poland is getting really
13:14weird. The prosecutor's office is
13:15saying very strange things. So, ladies
13:19and gentlemen, if you watched the
13:21prosecutor's office press conference
13:23yesterday regarding that gentleman who,
13:25according to Tusk, was preparing an
13:27assassination attempt on Donald Tusk
13:29and Kośniak-Kamysz, um, well, it has
13:31escalated very strongly there. Now the
13:35prosecutor's office is charging him not
13:37only with, watch out an attempted
13:43assassination of Tusk and
13:44Kośniak-Kamysz. But watch out, with
13:46the forcible overthrow of the state
13:48authorities. And here is where it
13:50starts to get interesting, ladies and
13:51gentlemen, because the forcible
13:53overthrow of the state authorities is
13:56something that fits two acts. One act
13:58is an act from an article, I mean,
14:00there is no such thing as "forcible
14:02overthrow of state authority" in the
14:04penal code. And the prosecutor did not
14:07cite articles, did not provide a legal
14:09basis. None of the journalists asked.
14:15The forcible overthrow of state
14:17authorities can, as all the lawyers I
14:19have spoken with agree with me, be best
14:21fitted to Article 127 of the Penal Code
14:23. Coup d'état. It could also be,
14:28ladies and gentlemen, it could also be
14:36stretched, but very, very poorly, to
14:38Article 128 of the Penal Code. an
14:43attack on a constitutional body of the
14:45Republic. Therefore, it must be assumed
14:49that it has escalated to the point
14:50where Tusk claims that a coup d'état
14:52was being prepared in Poland. This is,
15:04ladies and gentlemen, dangerous in that
15:09Tusk might introduce martial law in
15:11Poland any moment now. Because now all
15:15that’s missing is for him to say that
15:17this man, who just a short while ago
15:19supposedly only wanted to kill him,
15:21Tusk specifically as a person, and now,
15:23according to the prosecutor—I’ve
15:25written it down—wanted to violently
15:27overthrow the state authorities,
15:28meaning he wanted to seize power in
15:30Poland by force. Do you understand?
15:37Well, if Tusk says that he wanted to
15:39stage a coup, then he’ll soon say it
15:40was done on Russia's behalf and that
15:42there might be more such groups. That
15:47he alone must introduce martial law, so
15:49that someone here doesn't, with the
15:51help of sabotage groups, doesn't,
15:59someone, well, someone doesn't stage a
16:01coup and hand Poland over to Russia, so
16:03he must prevent it and introduces a
16:05state of emergency or martial law. And
16:09now: if you watched my podcast
16:11yesterday and the day before, you know
16:13that the whole operation is stitched
16:14with thick thread and this guy is
16:16evidently not so much framed as he is
16:18being used. He is a helpless elderly
16:27man from Facebook, and they are turning
16:29this grandfather with mild dementia,
16:30who even said himself during
16:32questioning that he is mentally
16:33unstable, into a dangerous bandit just
16:35to instill fear in people. And here is
16:43the thing that I talk about very often.
16:47It doesn’t matter if he was really
16:48planning a coup or not. In my opinion,
16:51he wasn't. I will prove it in a moment.
16:54However, it is important what people
16:55believe. If people believe that this
16:59elderly gentleman was planning a coup,
17:01then Tusk will introduce martial law or
17:02a state of emergency. Because he will
17:06say: "Well, listen, one coup was
17:07already being planned. The services
17:10foiled it at the very last second. We
17:13cannot risk that one might actually
17:15succeed. It is a bit, ladies and
17:19gentlemen, like those satanic and
17:20occult rituals that were practiced by
17:26international elites on Epstein's
17:27island. It doesn’t matter if Satan
17:31exists, if demons exist, or if
17:33sacrificing people to demons gives any
17:38power at all. The person who lay on
17:43that table and was tortured to death
17:45endured that suffering regardless, and
17:47then was killed anyway. Yes, for that
17:53person, who was first tortured and then
17:56deprived of life, it doesn’t matter
17:57if occultism actually exists, if it
17:59works, or if those torturers got
18:01anything metaphysical for it or not.
18:06They suffered anyway, and now they are
18:08dead. Perhaps the fate of their soul
18:11after death might be different. Yes.
18:14Likewise, it doesn’t matter here
18:16whether a real coup was being prepared
18:18in Poland. In my opinion, it was not.
18:23In my opinion, a few older people who
18:25were very bored are being used by the
18:27government to convince us of this. But
18:31were they preparing anything or not? If
18:34people believe it, Tusk will impose
18:36martial law on us. And in my opinion,
18:38that is exactly what he wants. He is
18:40trying every method under the sun to
18:42impose martial law on us. Why? Because
18:47then he will have full power, he will
18:49be able to censor the internet, and he
18:51could even call off the elections. And
18:58from that perspective, ladies and
18:59gentlemen, it is dangerous in my
19:01opinion. Maybe let's start from the
19:05very beginning. What is this all about?
19:08If you watched my yesterday's podcast
19:15titled" They broke down the door,
19:17unbelievable, who sent them, "about how
19:19the police broke down the door while he
19:21was recording his broadcast. That was
19:27the number one topic of yesterday's
19:29show. I encourage you, if you haven't
19:33seen it, go watch it, because that
19:34number one topic is very, very intense.
19:37It is also a truly very, very intense
19:40topic. Well, ladies and gentlemen,
19:43dammit, you're sitting there, filming a
19:45broadcast, and suddenly the police
19:46break down your door and haul you away.
19:48I wouldn't wish for anyone to go
19:50through that. Yes. However, in topic
19:52number 2, I talked about that great
19:57assassin who allegedly plotted against
19:59Tusk and what a farce it turned out to
20:01be. And there, I talked about who this
20:12gentleman is? The gentleman is an
20:15elderly man, closer to 70 than 60, who
20:20is who is a man who started a Facebook
20:29channel and on that channel, he
20:31generally insulted many different
20:33people quite harshly and also put
20:34forward various theses, but he was
20:36generally incredibly niche. And, how
20:45should I put it, making an assassin out
20:55of this gentleman was something
20:57embarrassing, because he was simply an
20:59elderly man who who could barely walk,
21:05and you can see that just by the videos
21:07that leaked, as he was being led into
21:09the Warsaw prosecutor's office for
21:11proceedings. Well, this gentleman could
21:14simply barely walk. Generally, if you
21:19remember those cases regarding criminal
21:21threats against Jurek Owsiak, which
21:23were quite, let's say, disgusting,
21:31because they were dragging people out
21:32of their homes at 6:00 AM who had
21:34written some stupid comments and
21:35nothing more. There were no criminal
21:38threats there. Because for a threat to
21:41be criminal, it must be realistic to
21:43carry out. Therefore, well, sorry, but
21:47if an elderly lady in a terminal stage
21:51of cancer says she will harm someone,
21:56it is hardly realistic to carry out.
22:00And we saw those exact kinds of elderly
22:02people there who could barely walk, yet
22:04they were being dragged out like great
22:06thugs. Well, this gentleman was even
22:10less able to walk. A great, great...The
22:21great organization this gentleman
22:22created was simply his fans, his fans
22:24on Facebook who were just sitting there
22:26writing various things. Not necessarily
22:31smart, if I may put it that way. The
22:34gentleman was saying various things, if
22:36I may say so. But to assume he could
22:39realistically want to finish off Tusk.
22:43And Kosiniak-Kamysz as well. Well, that
22:46is just a laughingstock. The guy
22:49generally moves around with a walker.
22:53An elderly gentleman with early
22:55dementia, partially sane. He himself
22:58claimed during the interrogation that
22:59he wasn't sane. Listen, that he has
23:02some papers to prove he isn't fully
23:04sane, that he is receiving psychiatric
23:06treatment. Well, the elderly gentleman
23:12generally said stupid things on the
23:14internet, but to paint him as a person
23:16who had a real chance to kill the Prime
23:22Minister, that was something, that was
23:31something, if I may say, totally
23:33irrational. It’s like, I don't know,
23:37if Mariusz Pudzianowski read my comment
23:39:" Mariusz, I’m going to break your
23:41bones. "And Mariusz went and said
23:45he’s afraid of me, that I’ll beat
23:46him up. You know, Mariusz Pudzianowski,
23:53who has arms bigger than my legs, who
23:55could, damn it, send me to Valhalla
23:57with a wave of his hand. No, Mariusz
24:03saying that I, that he, that he is
24:05afraid of me. Well. Something
24:10completely irrational. Yes. The same
24:15goes for saying that this man would be
24:17physically capable of eliminating the
24:19Minister of National Defense, protected
24:21by the Military Gendarmerie and SOP (
24:23State Protection Service), or the Prime
24:25Minister, protected by SOP and other
24:27services. It is just physically
24:32impossible. Well. For one, he wouldn't
24:35be able to run up, and. He walks, he
24:40walks so slowly. No, that is just
24:42physically impossible. Yes, it’s
24:44clear that it’s very possible, very
24:46much so, right? Either the state
24:53services got baited, we’ll talk about
24:55that in a moment, or the second option,
24:57they are just blatantly looking for a
24:58pretext to introduce martial law in
25:00Poland. And now they have embarrassed
25:05themselves, and embarrassed themselves
25:06quite heavily, because it’s already
25:08slowly leaking out. Damn, I actually de
25:10facto exposed it. Like the names of
25:13this gentleman’s organization, who he
25:17declared himself to be, that he is some
25:19kind of leader there, something or
25:21other, and so on. It is slowly starting
25:25to dawn on people that he, with
25:26Kosiniak-Kamysz, decided they were
25:28genuinely afraid of an assassination
25:30attempt by, well, a grandpa. Yes. And
25:34they embarrassed themselves. What’s
25:47more, one hypothesis is that they were
25:49simply set up, because they didn't
25:51track this man's account and what he
25:53says, but instead, a tip went to the
25:55SOP inbox, that is, the State
25:56Protection Service. A tip came in.
26:01Someone wrote an email there. And they,
26:04well, I assume, because I haven't seen
26:07that email. It is known that they
26:09received an email. I haven't seen that
26:14email, but I assume the email contained
26:16a link to a very specific statement by
26:18this man in a very specific video, with
26:20timestamps, claiming he threatened to
26:22finish off Tusk and Kosiniak-Kamysz.
26:29And the services, instead of checking
26:30who they were dealing with, instead of
26:32checking this man's content, instead of
26:34vetting this person, they would have
26:36found out he is an elderly man who
26:37doesn't leave his house and, well, he
26:39is dangerous, but in the sense that he
26:41might bring hate upon someone. Possibly
26:45his followers might do something
26:47unpleasant to someone, because he says
26:49various nasty things there. Yes.
26:51However, the man himself is completely
26:53harmless, because he is simply old and
26:55frail. And physically, he has no way of
26:58doing anything bad to anyone. So the
27:01services clearly told Tusk about it.
27:04Tusk and, above all, probably Minister
27:06Kierwiński. In any case, the Tuskists
27:10as such started talking loudly about an
27:12" assassination attempt, "because they
27:14needed it for purely political purposes
27:16, right? They needed to divert
27:19attention from various blunders they
27:21were having at the time, and they had
27:22quite a few, so they started talking
27:24about it. Then it dawned on the
27:28politicians that they had embarrassed
27:30themselves because they publicly stated
27:32they were afraid of an elderly man who
27:33walks with a walker and mostly just
27:35around his apartment, since he rarely
27:37leaves it, right? Well then well then
27:45it was already too late, because they
27:46had already said what they said. And in
27:50such situations, there are two PR
27:52strategies. The first is to pretend the
27:54matter never happened. That’s what
27:58they did, for example, during the flood
28:00with that boy, the young man who wrote
28:02on some local forum about some looters.
28:09Uh, and the Chief of Police jumped in,
28:11claiming it was hindering the flood
28:13evacuation, and they tried to make him
28:15out to be a major criminal. But the
28:21whole thing fell apart. I publicized it
28:24, because other media outlets picked it
28:26up from me. Consequently, they adopted
28:28a tactic. The matter never happened.
28:30The boy was questioned, but not as a
28:32suspect, only as a witness, and the
28:34case was squashed. So, they embarrassed
28:37themselves, backed off, and pretended
28:39there was no issue. That is one
28:43strategy that was applied right then
28:45during the flood. And the second
28:49strategy that, in my opinion, Donald
28:51Tusk is currently pursuing is a
28:53strategy of escalation, meaning
28:55increasingly serious charges and
28:59turning up the heat on the topic while
29:04simultaneously slightly threatening all
29:06people like me who might want to point
29:08out that what Mr. Tusk is doing is,
29:10well, at the very least, bad and
29:12immoral. So, ladies and gentlemen, now
29:15these men, him and his circle, are
29:17being turned into—ladies and
29:19gentlemen—great terrorists. The
29:22prosecutor's office spokesperson said
29:24that these people (I say" people "
29:30because maybe there are some women
29:31there, but it looks like it's just men
29:33for now), that they were preparing,
29:35mind you, a coup d'état in Poland—
29:37and he used those words, listen, and
29:39that this is what they are accused of.
29:42Listen, that such charges are being
29:44brought against them. Mind you, the
29:46forcible overthrow of state authorities
29:48. Well, the forcible overthrow of state
29:50authorities is exactly what a coup
29:51d'état is, right? And that, to that
29:54end, mind you, units were formed. Units
29:57were formed. Reportedly, they already
30:00had three units, and a fourth unit was
30:02in the process of being formed. And
30:12this, ladies and gentlemen, is the
30:14first element that should set off alarm
30:16bells for us Poles. Either Tusk asked
30:19the prosecutor's office to lie outright
30:21, or those ruling our country are
30:27totally incompetent and we are really
30:29in danger. Because, ladies and
30:33gentlemen, there is no information, as
30:35the prosecutor did not state how many
30:37people are in these units, but it seems
30:39to me they are at least three people.
30:43Generally, a" unit "makes me think of
30:45several dozen people. I mean, honestly,
30:47ladies and gentlemen, to realistically
30:49carry out a coup d'état, those three
30:51units would need to have about 100,000
30:54people each. Let me remind you that to
30:57carry out a coup d'état, you have to
30:59take over all media, television
31:01stations, and so on. You have to take
31:05over the police, the police, the
31:06military, everything, everything that
31:12is even remotely paramilitary and so on
31:14. Right? That's how you do a coup
31:15d'état, right? Meaning you seize power
31:19in the country by force, which means
31:21you have to occupy the media, the
31:22parliament, all ministries, subordinate
31:25the military to yourself, you can't do
31:26that with a damn thousand people. You
31:30have to have tens of thousands of
31:32people. So if those units weren't tens
31:37of thousands of people each, well, it's
31:39rather physically impossible. And it's
31:48hard for me to imagine that a podcast
31:50creator on Facebook, who had, mind you,
31:528,000 subscribers, would create a
31:54multi-tens-of-thousands-strong army.
31:59Well, well, it seems rather impossible
32:05to me, but okay, okay, okay, okay,
32:07let's move on. Wait, because what am I
32:12getting at? I'm getting at the fact
32:14that only this one man was arrested,
32:16detained and arrested. So either the
32:20prosecutor's office is telling untruths
32:22and these gentlemen—well, gentlemen,
32:24ladies, these people are completely
32:26harmless. These are just ordinary
32:31internet ranters who were talking a big
32:33game, but beyond the talk, nothing
32:35really came of it. Or, dear ladies and
32:41gentlemen, we now have a group of
32:43lethally dangerous and armed people
32:45walking free. I will tell you in a
32:48moment why this is another
32:49embarrassment for the prosecutor's
32:51office. People who want to stage a coup
32:54in Poland. Yes. Because listen, the
33:01prosecutor's office claims they found,
33:03in this gentleman's possession,
33:07improvised explosive devices, with
33:09which they wanted to, well, harm people
33:12, kill. So, like, improvised grenades,
33:15or maybe even bombs, I think they call
33:17them. I'll tell you exactly what this
33:19is about in a moment. Well, that sounds
33:25dangerous, right? Very dangerous indeed
33:29. And and what? They grabbed one, but
33:36the rest are still walking free, they
33:38didn't grab the rest. Well, you know, I
33:43didn't graduate in criminology. I only
33:46had four semesters of criminology when
33:48I was studying to be a lawyer. Yes. Uh,
33:55but it seems to me that you don't need
33:57to be a forensics specialist, or a
33:59security services expert for that
34:01matter, uh, to know that groups like
34:03this, wanting to carry out a coup,
34:05sorry, a forceful overthrow of state
34:07authorities, are rounded up in their
34:09entirety. I remind you that either we
34:18consider these people dangerous,
34:19meaning those who could actually carry
34:21out their threats, and then arresting
34:23this gentleman is indeed justified. But
34:29then, there's a number of people
34:30remaining at large about whom we know
34:32nothing, and they are still dangerous,
34:34they could kill. Or, we consider them
34:37harmless. But then this elderly
34:39gentleman is also harmless, and we
34:40should apologize to him, take him home,
34:42and call a nurse. Do you understand?
34:53But dear ladies and gentlemen, it gets
34:55even better when the prosecutor starts
34:57talking in detail about the tools they
35:03supposedly wanted to use to forcefully
35:05overthrow the state authorities. And
35:09this is where it starts to get really
35:11creepy, because they found, watch out,
35:13firecrackers. Just regular, normal
35:16firecrackers that you can buy at a
35:18fireworks store, because New Year's Eve
35:20is coming up soon, so people will be
35:22shooting those. So, they had those
35:24kinds of firecrackers at home. I'm
35:26ashamed to admit it, but I have a few
35:28left over from last New Year's Eve. I
35:31hope they don't come for me. I remind
35:32you that this is completely legal. You
35:35buy them normally at a fireworks store.
35:38And watch out, they also had metal
35:41balls, no, sorry, marbles. Well, that's
35:46becoming particularly dangerous,
35:48because this gentleman had
35:49granddaughters, and kids these days
35:51have such a popular toy. Marbles,
35:55playing marbles. Besides, that was
35:59already around when I was young. Such,
36:01such small balls. And according to the
36:05prosecutor, the fact that they had
36:07firecrackers and marbles means they
36:09wanted to build grenades. To be honest,
36:14I can only guess how, maybe they wanted
36:20to glue these pellets to the
36:21firecrackers in the hope that when such
36:23a firecracker explodes, it would
36:24scatter the pellets. Honestly, that
36:29never crossed my mind, so I don't know
36:31if something like that would even work.
36:36I also don't want to experiment,
36:38because if it did work, I would hurt
36:39myself and heaven forbid someone nearby
36:41, so I don't want to run such an
36:43experiment. However, let me put it this
36:53way, it would be different if they had
36:55found ready-made improvised grenades,
36:57rather than finding firecrackers that
36:59are completely legal and pellets that
37:00are also completely legal. You know, I
37:06don't want to sound like some great
37:08expert, because I'm not, and I
37:09definitely don't want to give anyone
37:11any ideas. God forbid, that's not it at
37:14all. But what I am trying to say is
37:16that by combining products you can buy
37:30at any farm supply store, like
37:32fertilizers, with products that are
37:33so-called household chemicals, which
37:35almost everyone who keeps their house
37:37clean has, for example, certain agents,
37:39let's call them detergents. Well, if
37:48you mix those together, you get ANFO,
37:50one of the most powerful explosives.
37:53And so, on that principle, one could
38:00raid the home of any farmer who isn't a
38:02slob and cleans their house, claiming
38:03they have the items needed to make one
38:05of the most powerful explosives. So
38:14either we have several hundred thousand
38:15, if not over a million terrorists in
38:17Poland who should be locked up for
38:19having at home materials for producing
38:27very serious explosive charges. Or we
38:34should acknowledge that just because
38:36someone has normal, legal substances
38:37and other items that could potentially
38:39be used to make something, it doesn't
38:41mean they want to do it. For example,
38:46ladies and gentlemen, I have here, I
38:51don't know, a USB cable. Oh, I'm
38:53showing it now, look, a USB cable. I
38:57have a USB cable. Yes, I have a USB
39:00cable. What could you potentially do
39:02with a USB cable? Well, many things.
39:04For example, you could make a noose out
39:10of it and log out of life. Does that
39:13mean I want to do that? No. It means
39:17I'm about to connect my phone to my
39:19computer and offload some data from it.
39:26You know, Korwin once explained this
39:28very well, that picking on people for
39:29having something that could potentially
39:31be used for something would mean we'd
39:33have to arrest every man, because each
39:35of us, or at least almost every one of
39:37us, carries a potential tool for rape
39:39in our pants. Nevertheless, most of us
39:45don't do that. And let me tell you,
40:02ladies and gentlemen, quite honestly, I
40:04don't know if sticking ball bearings to
40:06a firecracker can hurt someone. I think
40:09it can. And that's why I don't want to
40:12test it. I know that a firecracker
40:14alone, without anything stuck to it,
40:16can be dangerous. That's why, for
40:20example, I'm glad that when I was a kid
40:22and used them, nothing happened to me,
40:23and I'm even more glad that my daughter
40:25doesn't feel the need to play with them
40:27, because it really is dangerous. Yes.
40:35Well, nevertheless, buying and
40:37possessing them is legal, right? If you
40:42have small quantities, right? Yeah. And
40:48here we enter into something
40:49potentially dangerous, because while
40:51this man was indeed saying stupid
40:53things on the internet, right? Uh,
40:57there are a lot of people who say
40:59really stupid things, and if we were to
41:01arrest everyone who says stupid things,
41:02we would have to arrest the entire
41:04government. Well, that would probably
41:09be good for Poland, actually. However,
41:11we would probably have to arrest about
41:13half the people in Poland too, because
41:14a lot of us talk nonsense. Do you
41:21understand? They, at least that’s how
41:26I understood it, had firecrackers and
41:28wanted to stick ball bearings to them,
41:30and with that, they wanted to, watch
41:32this, carry out a forcible overthrow of
41:36the state authorities. So what? They
41:40wanted to make these improvised
41:41grenades and pelt tanks and infantry
41:47fighting vehicles with them to defeat
41:49the army, force it into submission, and
41:51in this way lead to, I quote, a
41:53forcible overthrow of state authorities
41:55. I am not of the opinion that the
41:59Polish army is particularly strong. The
42:02Polish army is strong on paper, but in
42:04reality, in my opinion, it is not.
42:07However, uh, I don't think it could be
42:16defeated by a group, or even three
42:17groups, of however many retirees, armed
42:19with firecrackers and ball bearings. So
42:26, some really serious ridicule of state
42:28authority has occurred here. In my
42:31opinion, with the goal—and that is
42:33the worst part of it all, this goal is
42:35the worst. In my opinion, the goal is
42:39to create a pretext for introducing a
42:41state of emergency or martial law in
42:43Poland. And that is the part, which is
42:53actually really dangerous. Let's read
42:56about what some mainstream media are
42:58saying about this. Oh, first, ladies
43:00and gentlemen, let's read the
43:01regulations at all, because the
43:03spokesman didn't provide the legal
43:05qualification. In my opinion, the"
43:09forcible overthrow of state authority "
43:12best fits a coup d'état, that is, an
43:14act under Article 172 of the Penal Code
43:16. Title of the article, let's read
43:21paragraph 1, paragraph 2. They were
43:24only making preparations there."
43:27Whoever, with the aim of depriving [the
43:29Republic] of its independence,
43:30detaching a part of its territory, or
43:32changing by force the constitutional
43:34system of the Republic... "In my
43:36opinion, it falls under that third one.
43:43If one undertakes, in agreement with
43:45other persons—and here it would be an
43:47entire group, so clearly in agreement
43:49with other persons—an activity aimed
43:51at, aiming directly at the realization
43:53of this goal, they are subject to
43:54imprisonment for a term of not less
43:56than 10 years or to life imprisonment,
44:05so life imprisonment for talking
44:07nonsense on the internet and having
44:09firecrackers and ball bearings. But
44:13here, fortunately, it likely only falls
44:16under preparation: whoever makes
44:17preparations to commit the crime
44:19specified in paragraph one is subject
44:21to imprisonment for a term of three to
44:2320 years. Well, for this gentleman,
44:27it’s clearly life imprisonment.
44:29Alternatively, the second, the second,
44:32the second crime: Article 128 of the
44:34Penal Code—an attack on a
44:36constitutional body. Attack on a
44:48constitutional body: whoever, for the
44:50purpose of removing by force a
44:52constitutional body of the Republic of
44:54Poland, undertakes activity aimed at,
44:56directly at the realization of this
44:58goal, is subject to imprisonment from
45:00three to 20 years. In my opinion, that
45:03is not removing a constitutional body
45:05by force. Well, that is removing
45:09someone from a position, and they
45:11didn’t want to remove someone from a
45:13position here; they wanted to forcibly
45:15overthrow the state authority, the
45:17entire authority, and not just one
45:18specific person. Yes. And here, whoever
45:23makes preparations to commit the crime
45:25specified in paragraph one is subject
45:26to imprisonment from three months to
45:28five years? Whoever, by force or
45:35unlawful threat, exerts influence on
45:37the official activities of a
45:39constitutional body of the Republic of
45:41Poland? They are subject to
45:43imprisonment from one to 10 years.
45:47That’s heavy, isn't it? And here,
45:51ladies and gentlemen, where did I get
45:53these metal ball bearings on
45:54firecrackers from? It’s 0.pl. The
45:57portal is called 0.pl. Mr. Tomasz
45:59Pałasz was planning an attack on the
46:02Prime Minister. Metal ball bearings on
46:05firecrackers. Krzysztof N. planned the
46:07forceful overthrow of the government,
46:09that is to say, a coup d'état and an
46:11attack on, among others, Prime Minister
46:13Donald Tusk. Look at that, it's the
46:15word" and, "so both of these things.
46:17Krzysztof N. planned the forceful
46:18overthrow of the government. This is a,
46:20this is a coup d'état and an attack on
46:22, among others, Prime Minister Donald
46:25Tusk. So this is an attack, right? And
46:27Deputy Prime Minister Władysław
46:29Kosiniak-Kamysz. In his apartment, the
46:31services secured improvised explosive
46:33devices resembling grenades. The
46:36prosecutor's office submitted a motion
46:38for temporary arrest to the court.
46:42Intelligence and investigative services
46:44thwarted an attempt to carry out an
46:45attack on representatives of the Polish
46:47authorities. On Sunday, information
46:50reached the police and the State
46:52Protection Service regarding a real
46:54threat to the lives of Prime Minister
46:56Donald Tusk and Deputy Prime Minister
46:58Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz. The
47:00reaction was immediate. At the ABW
47:05Anti-Terrorist Center, representatives
47:07of the police, the State Protection
47:08Service, and the Internal Security
47:10Agency were urgently convened, which
47:12led to the Sunday arrest of 66-year-old
47:14Krzysztof N. It was certainly easier
47:16because the guy wouldn't leave his
47:18house and gave his phone number during
47:20his broadcasts. So it was enough to see
47:25who it was registered to and where the
47:27person it’s registered to lives.
47:31During a search of the suspect's
47:33apartment, conducted by SOP officers in
47:35cooperation with the police, a
47:36dangerous arsenal was discovered. As
47:40informed by the spokesperson for the
47:42District Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw,
47:44Prosecutor Piotr Antoni Skiva,
47:46investigators have secured over a dozen
47:48improvised explosive devices.
47:52Preliminary examinations indicate that
47:54these were devices structurally similar
47:56to fragmentation grenades. Inside the
48:00noise-making firecrackers, there were,
48:03among other things, metal balls. Well,
48:05I have my doubts, but I’m not saying
48:09I’m right, and please forgive me, I
48:11won't be experimenting with this. Umm,
48:18well, I have serious doubts whether a
48:20firecracker has enough power to give
48:22such balls enough force to hurt anyone.
48:29I won't be checking that, but I do have
48:31doubts. Yes. Objects resembling alarm
48:37and pneumatic weapons were also found
48:38on the premises. Ladies and gentlemen,
48:42a reminder: an alarm weapon is not
48:44actually a weapon, it’s just called
48:46that. And a pneumatic weapon, well,
48:48that’s just an air gun. I personally
48:53don’t own an air gun. I don’t own
48:55anything at all that resembles a weapon
48:57. Maybe because during my childhood,
49:04well, I read too much about kids who
49:06went out into the street to play with
49:08toys, with toys, pure toys, that looked
49:10like weapons, and they were shot
49:11because they were playing foolishly,
49:13yes, they had a weapon in their hand.
49:19Someone had an object resembling a
49:21weapon, a toy, someone thought it was
49:23real, took it, and shot the kid.
49:26Therefore, I tried not to play with
49:28such things, and such things are not in
49:30my house. My relatives also don’t
49:33play with such things. Nevertheless,
49:37ladies and gentlemen, owning an air gun
49:39at home is legal. Pneumatic weapons, I
49:43think, are also legal. It depends on,
49:47well, a pneumatic weapon is an air gun.
49:51An alarm weapon is, among other things,
49:53I think, for firing signal flares. Yes,
49:57I also think that is legal. Apart from
50:09dangerous materials, investigators
50:11secured data storage devices and the 66
50:14-year-old's contact list. And that,
50:16ladies and gentlemen, is an important
50:18thing. Because if this guy was really a
50:23dangerous terrorist, dangerous enough
50:25that he wanted to carry out a coup in
50:27Poland, then surely the people he
50:29worked with should also be locked up.
50:34And if we assume they are not dangerous
50:36in any way, then how on earth can we
50:38consider him dangerous? Analysis of
50:47materials. Analysis of internet
50:53materials points to an attempt to form
50:55an extremist group. I’m not defending
51:01this gentleman, but we have a whole lot
51:03of extremists in Poland. For example,
51:05some in Tusk's government. For example,
51:07a guy who was having fun to the sound
51:09of the communist Internationale. I
51:12remind you that communism is on the
51:14list of prohibited systems in Poland.
51:16Yes, you go to jail for publicly
51:18promoting communism. Well, Gawkowski is
51:21sitting, but in the government.
51:26Minister of the Interior and
51:28Administration Marcin Kierwiński noted
51:30that—oh, excuse me—most of the
51:32posts, videos, and materials inciting
51:34violence posted by the man on Facebook
51:36were deleted immediately after his
51:38arrest. That is interesting. That would
51:44suggest that someone else had access to
51:46the account, because he likely didn’t
51:48do it remotely while he was handcuffed
51:50in that car. Yes. Minister of the
51:56Interior and Administration Marcin
51:58Kierwiński noted that Krzysztof N.
52:00comes from very radical circles and
52:02maintained contacts online with many
52:04people with similar views. I wasn't a
52:13connoisseur of his content, so I won't
52:15comment, because I didn't watch it and
52:17the gentleman’s views were probably
52:19not close to mine anyway. However, I
52:24would like to point out that in Poland,
52:26you can have any views you want. Only
52:30publicly promoting them carries a
52:32penalty. For example, if you have the
52:36view that I’m handsome, but you keep
52:38it to yourself, you can hold that view
52:40all you want. And even if you write in
52:43a comment that I’m handsome, you
52:44won't face any punishment for that
52:46either. At most, someone might decide
52:48you have poor taste, right? But there
52:50are views that you cannot promote. Yes.
52:54But you can possess them. There is a
52:57fundamental difference between
52:58promoting and possessing. For example,
53:01I possess poor culinary taste, which is
53:03why I’m so fat, but I don’t promote
53:06it; I actually discourage it. On
53:09Tuesday, procedural actions took place
53:11at the Warsaw prosecutor's office,
53:13during which Krzysztof N. heard a total
53:15of nine charges. Do you understand?
53:18Nine charges. The most serious of them
53:23concerns planning the forcible
53:25overthrow of state authorities using
53:27stockpiled explosives, for which the
53:29penalty is two to 15 years of
53:30imprisonment. Importantly, the suspect
53:38targeted not only representatives of
53:39the current government in his actions,
53:41but also politicians of the previous
53:43ruling team—so he didn't like the PiS
53:45members either. The remaining charges
53:52relate to online activity, including
53:55promoting an ideology of violence,
53:57inciting the forceful seizure of power,
53:59promoting a war of aggression, and
54:01inciting hatred based on nationality,
54:03ethnicity, race, and politics. During
54:10the interrogation, the 66-year-old did
54:12not admit to the alleged acts and
54:14refused to provide explanations. The
54:17prosecutor's office informed that it
54:19will be necessary to subject him to
54:21detailed psychiatric examinations. I
54:27have no doubts about that, because I
54:29watched the press conference and the
54:31prosecutor himself said that this
54:32gentleman is pointing to his mental
54:34health problems, including dementia.
54:39Due to the developmental nature of the
54:41case, the fear of tampering with
54:42evidence, and the real threat of
54:44committing a crime. Against life and
54:47health. The prosecutor decided to
54:49submit an application to the court for
54:51temporary arrest. Investigators have a
54:56medical certificate authorizing
54:58detention under pharmacotherapy
54:59conditions. The custody hearing was
55:04scheduled for Wednesday. Prime Minister
55:10Donald Tusk and Deputy Prime Minister
55:12Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz publicly
55:14thanked the services for their
55:15efficient and effective action in
55:17thwarting the assassination attempt. So
55:22they are moving in the direction that
55:24this man not only plotted an attack on
55:28he was plotting an attack on Tusk and
55:30the other guy, but he also wanted to
55:32stage a coup d'état. Pretty heavy,
55:34right? Well, and similar similar things
55:40, dear ladies and gentlemen, are
55:42written in in TVN, on TVN24, Mr. Filip
55:49Czerwiński, the prosecutor's office,
55:52there are charges for a 66-year-old
55:54suspected of planning an attack on
55:56Donald Tusk and Uh and we can skip that
56:09one. This is an article from yesterday,
56:15but it also it it will be interesting.
56:16It's very short. Polskie Radio 24.pl.
56:20Kamila Ziółkowska, he threatened Tusk
56:23and Kosiniak-Kamysz. Police are
56:26searching the apartment. Ministry of
56:29Interior spokesperson Karolina Gałecka
56:32informed Polish Radio that the detained
56:34man threatened Prime Minister Donald
56:36Tusk and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz.
56:38The police are conducting operations
56:40with him. Threats of an attack on the
56:43prime minister and deputy prime
56:44minister. The police, this is before
56:46they even stated that he wanted to
56:48stage a coup. Police are searching the
56:50detainee's apartment. The man was
56:52detained on Sunday afternoon. As
56:56Karolina Gałecka reported, the police
56:58are conducting operations with him
57:00today in his apartment, which is also
57:01being searched. The spokesperson
57:05confirmed that the detainee is a Polish
57:07citizen. They managed to detain the man
57:09who threatened the prime minister and
57:11the deputy prime minister. At this
57:13moment, services are carrying out
57:14activities on-site. The man was
57:17detained in his own apartment, which he
57:19didn't leave, so where else would he be
57:21detained? At the moment, we are not
57:25releasing details about who the man is.
57:28And here, dear ladies and gentlemen
57:35I've been saying from the beginning
57:36that the fact that they didn't show the
57:38video or photos of the arrest is quite
57:39suspicious. Well, now we know why it's
57:43suspicious. Basically, what it was all
57:46about. The thing is, when you look at
57:49this gentleman, you just feel sympathy
57:51for him, because he is an elderly,
57:53feeble man. Uh, and they are painting
57:57him as a man who wanted to stage a coup
57:58in Poland. Uh, it doesn't seem like
58:02something, uh, I would say uh, it
58:09doesn't seem like something, m,
58:11probable. Yes. It doesn't seem like
58:15something a serious person could take
58:16seriously. Dear ladies and gentlemen,
58:19speaking of unserious people, let's
58:21listen to what Mr. Gawkowski says.
58:28Topic number 2. Gawkowski threw Tusk
58:34under the bus, admitted that they can
58:36already block accounts in an immediate
58:38mode, if those social media accounts
58:45are doing something bad. PS. Look, they
58:48are sitting at a table shaped like a
58:50toilet seat. I must honestly say, it's
58:53fitting. Let's listen to
58:56>> what happened and how we will be
58:58working in the coming days. Deputy
58:59Prime Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski.
59:03>> Mr. Prime Minister, ladies and
59:05gentlemen, since Thursday, services
59:07responsible for Internet security have
59:09been operating in emergency mode. All
59:15communications that appear online,
59:16regardless of whether they concern
59:18issues related to imitation, which the
59:21Prime Minister spoke about, or a
59:22growing interest in subcultures linked
59:25to criminal groups, are being monitored
59:27and reported directly to the Police. We
59:34have noticed in the last few hours that
59:36accounts have also appeared, which were
59:38immediately blocked, that were
59:40glorifying the man who committed the
59:41crime on Thursday. And these actions, I
59:47also warn everyone that anyone who
59:49would like to create such accounts
59:51online today, indicating or in any way
59:53imitating them, are also part of this
59:58panic that we are unnecessarily
1:00:00inciting, while at the same time, the
1:00:02services will take action in every such
1:00:05case. Last week, on Thursday, a bill
1:00:08concerning internet safety was adopted.
1:00:12A bill that would specifically allow
1:00:14for situations where, if some community
1:00:17is growing and situations arise where
1:00:19people want to live-stream critical
1:00:20events, or are directly threatening or
1:00:23indicating that we are dealing with the
1:00:25promotion of death or suicide. These
1:00:28contents will be able to be blocked.
1:00:32The matter concerning this bill will be
1:00:34processed in an extraordinary mode. As
1:00:38early as this coming Tuesday, Prime
1:00:40Minister, at 8:00 AM, a Senate
1:00:42committee meeting is being held and
1:00:44this bill will be adopted this week by
1:00:46the Senate as well, so by the end of
1:00:48this week, it will be on the
1:00:49President's desk with the clear
1:00:51expectation that the internet safety
1:00:53bill, all the regulations that give us
1:00:55a chance to fight hate speech and
1:00:57various kinds of pathological content,
1:00:59will be quickly adopted. And that is
1:01:08basically the whole message. Yes. Since
1:01:14Gawkowski admitted that under the law
1:01:16that is currently in force, I remind
1:01:18you that this internet censorship bill
1:01:20was not signed by President Nawrocki.
1:01:25Therefore, it is not in effect. Yes, it
1:01:28is not a generally applicable law. not
1:01:32based on this bill that they have
1:01:33currently passed, but based on the
1:01:35regulations they already have now,
1:01:37which they already passed earlier. Uh,
1:01:44they managed, they were able to just
1:01:46like that, yes, in immediate mode, shut
1:01:48down accounts that were doing things
1:01:50they didn't like, because they were
1:01:52doing something wrong. Yes. Uh,
1:02:02therefore, Gawkowski has already
1:02:04admitted that accounts from which
1:02:05something wrong is being done, they can
1:02:07shut down just like that, so why the
1:02:09hell do they want to create new law, if
1:02:11they are already able to shut down
1:02:13accounts through which something wrong
1:02:15is done just like that? In my opinion,
1:02:22there can be only one answer, because
1:02:24they want to shut down accounts that
1:02:26are not doing anything wrong, but for
1:02:28example those that are doing good
1:02:30things. For example, they keep an eye
1:02:33on the authorities and thanks to this,
1:02:38they make the authorities function
1:02:39better, because it is known that
1:02:41authorities which no one is keeping an
1:02:43eye on usually behave very poorly. Yes.
1:02:46So the point is for someone to keep an
1:02:48eye on the authorities. Journalists
1:02:50used to keep an eye on the authorities.
1:02:55But for some time now, you can't really
1:02:57count on journalists to keep an eye on
1:02:58the authorities. Therefore, people on
1:03:05the internet are needed. Yes. I guess
1:03:16that's it. Yes. So it should be noted
1:03:26that the President should simply veto
1:03:33this internet censorship bill and
1:03:35that's it. Topic number 3. A Ukrainian
1:03:37caught smuggling weapons into Poland.
1:03:41Of course, we find out about such
1:03:43things as always from small local media
1:03:45, because mainstream media doesn't like
1:03:47to provide information that is
1:03:49unfavorable to the Ukrainian state.
1:03:53Ladies and gentlemen, the portal is
1:03:55called Lublin 112.pl. A Ukrainian
1:03:57citizen had a pistol under his jacket;
1:03:59he was detained. One could obviously
1:04:02suggest here, well, maybe he was just
1:04:04walking around with it on the street,
1:04:06not trying to cross the border with it.
1:04:10Well, if you have a weapon that you are
1:04:12trying to illegally cross the border
1:04:14with, that is called smuggling. And we
1:04:16continue reading, ladies and gentlemen,
1:04:18in this article. Control at the road
1:04:21border crossing in Zosin. Yes, so he
1:04:26tried to go through a road check,
1:04:28through a border crossing. Yes, he
1:04:32tried to smuggle it from Ukraine to
1:04:34Poland through a border crossing. The
1:04:38check at the road border crossing in
1:04:40Zosin ended with the discovery of
1:04:42undeclared weapons and ammunition,
1:04:44meaning he tried to smuggle it. It was
1:04:47being transported by a Ukrainian
1:04:48citizen. It was being transported by a
1:04:51Ukrainian citizen traveling by car to
1:04:53Poland. The man was charged with
1:04:55possession of a weapon without the
1:04:57required permit. Well, no, ladies and
1:04:59gentlemen, that is not possession of a
1:05:01weapon without a required permit. If
1:05:05someone tries to smuggle illegal drugs
1:05:07across the border, they don't get
1:05:08charged with possession of illegal
1:05:10drugs, but with smuggling. Look at how
1:05:15very mild charges are brought against
1:05:17Ukrainians. They caught a Ukrainian
1:05:19attempting to smuggle weapons, and they
1:05:21charge him with illegal possession. The
1:05:25incident took place on October 8, 2026.
1:05:29A car entering from Ukraine was
1:05:31subjected to a routine check. Officers
1:05:37of the Lublin Customs and Tax Service
1:05:39discovered weapons and ammunition
1:05:40during a routine check of a Toyota Land
1:05:43Cruiser passenger car. The passenger of
1:05:47the vehicle, a Ukrainian citizen, had
1:05:49hidden the dangerous items under his
1:05:51outer clothing. Well, that is blatant
1:05:53smuggling. stated Border Guard Major
1:05:57Dariusz Sienicki, press spokesperson
1:05:59for the commander of the Nadbużański
1:06:01Border Guard unit. The traveler did not
1:06:06produce the documents required for
1:06:07transporting weapons. Officers seized a
1:06:12Fort 12RM 9mm caliber pistol and 11
1:06:14rounds of ammunition. The man, along
1:06:17with the seized weapons and ammunition,
1:06:19was handed over to officers of the
1:06:21Border Guard post in Hrubieszów.
1:06:23investigation under the supervision of
1:06:24the prosecutor's office. Officers of
1:06:26the Nadbużański Border Guard unit are
1:06:29conducting an investigation under the
1:06:31prosecutor's supervision regarding
1:06:33Article 263, paragraph 2 of the Penal
1:06:36Code. I'll take, I'll take, ladies and
1:06:39gentlemen, and read ladies and
1:06:42gentlemen. Illegal possession of
1:06:46firearms or ammunition is subject to
1:06:48imprisonment from 6 months to 8 years.
1:06:51And what is the penalty for smuggling
1:06:53weapons? Smuggling weapons, penal code.
1:06:59Well, that is now, dear ladies and
1:07:01gentlemen, from one to 10 years. 263.
1:07:14Well. So the prosecutor is
1:07:18exceptionally lenient. The foreigner
1:07:20was brought by Border Guard officers to
1:07:22the regional prosecutor's office in
1:07:24Hrubieszów, where he was charged with
1:07:26possession of a weapon without the
1:07:28required permit. The spokesperson
1:07:30informed. As stressed by Border Guard
1:07:33Major Dariusz Sienicki, for the alleged
1:07:38crime, the man faces from six months to
1:07:408 years of imprisonment. The
1:07:43proceedings are being conducted under
1:07:45the supervision of the district
1:07:46prosecutor's office in Hrubieszów.
1:07:48Obligations when transporting weapons
1:07:50across the border. The Border Guard
1:07:53also reminds everyone of the rules
1:07:54regarding the transport of weapons and
1:07:56ammunition. We remind you that the
1:08:00transport from abroad and export abroad
1:08:02of weapons and ammunition, as well as
1:08:04transit through the territory of the
1:08:07Republic of Poland, and the rules for
1:08:09possession of weapons and ammunition by
1:08:11foreigners are defined by the Act on
1:08:13Weapons and Ammunition of May 21, 1999.
1:08:18According to the reminder provided,
1:08:20persons crossing the external border of
1:08:22the European Union must declare in
1:08:24writing to the competent customs
1:08:26authority the transport of weapons and
1:08:28ammunition and present the required
1:08:30documents. Well, he didn't have the
1:08:32required documents because he didn't
1:08:33have a weapon permit. He was probably a
1:08:35courier. Transporting it here for some
1:08:37gangster. The spokesperson listed among
1:08:40them, among other things, an export
1:08:42permit for weapons and ammunition and
1:08:44an import permit. a certificate issued
1:08:48by the competent consul of the Republic
1:08:50of Poland or a European firearms pass.
1:08:53Yes. And there is a photo further on,
1:08:56which shows what he was transporting.
1:08:58Well, dear ladies and gentlemen, here
1:09:00you can say outright, and just like
1:09:01that, another conspiracy theory has
1:09:03just become a fact. Let me say, what do
1:09:05we really have here? Well, we have
1:09:07weapons smuggling from Ukraine to
1:09:09Poland. That's it. I remind you that
1:09:20since this armed conflict began,
1:09:22numerous criminal groups have started
1:09:24appearing in Poland that are
1:09:25exceptionally well-armed. This man
1:09:30looks like he only wanted to smuggle
1:09:32one pistol and one magazine of
1:09:33ammunition. However, it is known that
1:09:46much, much more of it has been smuggled
1:09:49into Poland, right? And even
1:09:51military-grade weapons, which makes our
1:09:53police officers 'job increasingly
1:09:55difficult. Yes. Because if they go on
1:10:00an operation and there are bandits in
1:10:02the back who have military assault
1:10:04rifles, then it's not easy, right? It
1:10:10is very, very not easy, and it should
1:10:12be put to an end. Meanwhile, no one
1:10:18seems to have any desire to put an end
1:10:20to this. Dear ladies and gentlemen,
1:10:22next topic. The Internal Security
1:10:24Agency, or ABW, brushed off
1:10:26Kołodziejczak, they didn't accept his
1:10:28notification of a possible crime. They
1:10:30sent the report elsewhere. Basically,
1:10:33the point is that Mr. Kołodziejczak,
1:10:36after well, these recordings related to
1:10:45him came out, right, decided to adopt a
1:10:49very specific line of defense, meaning
1:10:55not to deny that, uh, that these, that
1:11:02these recordings are real, but to claim
1:11:04that he was slandered and to try, try
1:11:12to discredit those women by saying that
1:11:14he was being blackmailed. And to, at
1:11:27least in the media, turn from
1:11:29perpetrator into a victim. he
1:11:31emphasized everything in the media,
1:11:33right? Because you are not a
1:11:35perpetrator yet. You haven't even been
1:11:39charged, not to mention that you
1:11:40haven't been judged in any way, you
1:11:47haven't been judged in any way, and
1:11:49therefore, well, you're not a criminal,
1:11:52right? you haven't been convicted, so
1:11:55we are talking exclusively about media
1:12:00allegations. And now he is scheming to
1:12:04go, in media terms, from such a media
1:12:06perpetrator to, well, a media victim.
1:12:12Consequently, he went with Mr.–gosh,
1:12:14what’s the name of that poser, or not
1:12:16a poser, that very colorful man
1:12:18Rutkowski?–oh, he went with detective
1:12:23Rutkowski to file a crime report to the
1:12:26ABW. ABW, that is, you know, to add
1:12:31some gravitas, so there you go:
1:12:33Internal Security Agency. So, the fact
1:12:37that he was being blackmailed here, as
1:12:39he claims, is such a very important
1:12:41matter that it even falls under
1:12:43Poland's internal security, because he
1:12:46is just so very important. And the ABW
1:12:49decided that no, you are not very
1:12:51important, and they returned the
1:12:53notification without consideration,
1:12:55stating that it is a completely normal
1:12:57criminal case and they are referring it
1:12:59to the prosecutor's office. And what
1:13:01will the prosecutor's office do with it
1:13:03? Well, the prosecutor's office will
1:13:07decide whether to start proceedings or
1:13:09not, whether there will be a
1:13:10preliminary check, or if there will be
1:13:12no preliminary check in this case at
1:13:14all, or if an investigation will be
1:13:16launched later, something. For now, the
1:13:20ABW has washed its hands of it and said
1:13:23it doesn't want to have absolutely,
1:13:25damn it, anything to do with this case.
1:13:28Well, this is a very big defeat,
1:13:30clearly exemplary for Mr.
1:13:32Kołodziejczak. Yes, first there are
1:13:34recordings that, uh well do not serve
1:13:42him, these recordings really don't
1:13:44serve him at all. I would even say they
1:13:46extremely don't serve him. Then, after
1:13:50these recordings, there is some total
1:13:53embarrassment regarding this visit to
1:14:00the ABW by the gentleman together with
1:14:02that, what's his name, Rutkowski, where
1:14:05on one hand a tip went to the media
1:14:07that they would be filing it. I think
1:14:11that tip to the media came from Mr.
1:14:13Rutkowski. And on the other hand, Mr.
1:14:18Kołodziejczak stated that he wants
1:14:20privacy, will not and does not want to
1:14:22answer questions. So such a well, a bit
1:14:26ridiculous situation, right? On one
1:14:28hand, I want publicity, come and see
1:14:30what I'm doing, and on the other hand,
1:14:32listen, I won't answer your questions
1:14:34here, because what will happen behind
1:14:37closed doors is what's important, not
1:14:39this here. A bit of a farce. Yes. Uh,
1:14:43then there was a statement from some
1:14:45politician, likely from the PSL, who
1:14:47knew the case, about how Mr. Rutkowski
1:14:49—no, not Rutkowski, but how Mr.
1:14:51Kołodziejczak allegedly—because I
1:14:54must emphasize that there is absolutely
1:14:56no criminal case for any of this yet.
1:14:58These are just media stories for now.
1:15:01How Mr. Kołodziejczak allegedly
1:15:06treated his employees at the ministry,
1:15:08and apparently he treated them horribly
1:15:10, very badly, and embarrassingly, that
1:15:18things were happening there that,
1:15:19calling it mobbing is an understatement
1:15:21, that there were worse things going on
1:15:24there than mobbing, right? Yeah, heavy,
1:15:31very, very, very heavy. Yes. Well, and
1:15:34then that press conference in the Sejm,
1:15:36which well, calling it a disgrace is an
1:15:41understatement. Yes. I have no idea why
1:15:46it was held in the Sejm at all, because
1:15:49if Mr. Kołodziejczak were there, then
1:15:50I would understand, he is a member of
1:15:52parliament, but Mr. Rutkowski—what
1:15:54does Mr. Rutkowski have to do with this
1:15:56at all? Why was he even let into the
1:15:58Sejm? I could hold a press conference
1:16:01in the Sejm, too. Maybe I could. But
1:16:06you know, it seems to me, like, on what
1:16:09grounds, on what grounds does a
1:16:15detective agency represent Mr.
1:16:17Kołodziejczak? He could be represented
1:16:21by a professional representative, a
1:16:22legal advisor, or an attorney. But not
1:16:28a detective agency. But Mr. Rutkowski
1:16:38just showed up at Mr.
1:16:39Kołodziejczak’s conference without
1:16:41Mr. Kołodziejczak. And started
1:16:44spouting some nonsense about a drug
1:16:45dealer needing to turn himself in or
1:16:47something like that. Well, I’m
1:16:52telling you, if I were to say things
1:16:54like that, I’d immediately be accused
1:16:56of maybe wanting to buy something or
1:16:58something else, and I would certainly
1:17:00have very serious problems as a result.
1:17:04And here, well, Mr. Koł...Mr. Mr. Mr.
1:17:07Kołodziejczak, I think, I think, I
1:17:09think, I think Mr. Kołodziejczak might
1:17:12have problems. Paradoxically, I think
1:17:15it’s slowly dawning on him that
1:17:17hiring Mr. Rutkowski might not have
1:17:19been the best option he chose; on the
1:17:21contrary—it might have been one of
1:17:23the stupider ones. However, well, Mr.
1:17:26Rutkowski should probably also face
1:17:29some, well, something should be
1:17:32happening there. Yes. Yeah, yeah. Total
1:17:36mockery. Uh, the man with the"
1:17:41Rutkowski Patrol "badges, which are
1:17:44styled to resemble police badges. Let
1:17:49me emphasize again, it’s not that I
1:17:51support the" Kamraci, "heaven forbid,
1:17:53especially since they were very
1:17:55strongly...I was nice to them, and they
1:18:00behaved very badly, so let them, let
1:18:02them face the consequences. Yes.
1:18:09However, it seems to me that those
1:18:11paramilitary" Kamraci "militias are
1:18:13less styled after the police than than
1:18:21Mr. Rutkowski’s men. You can't just
1:18:25look like this in Poland, where people
1:18:27might mistake it for the police, and
1:18:29they have these badges, if I may put it
1:18:32that way. These aren't badges; they are
1:18:35, I don't know, logos. I mean, can you
1:18:38just make a company logo that looks
1:18:39exactly like the police? You're driving
1:18:45around in cars styled like police
1:18:47cruisers and wearing clothes styled
1:18:49like uniforms. It seems to me that this
1:18:54falls under impersonating an officer,
1:18:56and I don't think that's right.
1:19:01Speaking of good things now, because
1:19:03that was bad, this one is good. Topic
1:19:06number 5. Germany is revoking refugee
1:19:09status for a whole lot of people. This
1:19:11is an important lesson for Poland. Why
1:19:13is this an important lesson for Poland?
1:19:15Well, because in my opinion, we need to
1:19:17start thinking directly about revoking
1:19:21refugee status for Ukrainians, and
1:19:23doing it en masse. Onet: granted status
1:19:28is being revoked. Thousands of refugees
1:19:31in Germany are getting this letter. Mr.
1:19:35Albert Ling and Mr. Nikolaus Harbusz.
1:19:40The German government has begun a mass
1:19:42mailing of letters revoking the refugee
1:19:44status of thousands of Syrians, while
1:19:46simultaneously tempting them with a
1:19:48financial bonus for a voluntary return
1:19:50to their homeland. So, Germany decided
1:19:54that they took them in because there
1:19:57was a war in Syria, but there is no war
1:19:59there anymore, so go back home. Thank
1:20:03you, goodbye. Bye bye. And this is the
1:20:07right approach, ladies and gentlemen.
1:20:12Europe is not a place where just anyone
1:20:14who wants to can come here and live. No
1:20:17, it isn't. Europe is a place for
1:20:21Europeans. These few sentences could
1:20:25change everything for thousands of
1:20:27Syrian refugees in Germany. Well,
1:20:30they're not refugees anymore; since
1:20:32their status has been revoked, they are
1:20:34illegals staying in Germany. At the top
1:20:44, it says" Decision. "Below are three
1:20:47rulings from the Federal Office for
1:20:49Migration and Refugees. In short, the
1:20:52BAMF. The granted refugee status is
1:20:56being revoked. Subsidiary protection
1:20:59status is not being granted. No ban on
1:21:05deportation has been established under
1:21:07the Residence Act. Such a 16-page
1:21:13ruling reached the editorial offices of
1:21:16Bild. Many Syrians living in Germany
1:21:21are currently receiving similar letters
1:21:23. This applies to people who have been
1:21:27flagged by the police or who
1:21:28temporarily left Germany but returned.
1:21:32And we need to do exactly the same with
1:21:34Ukrainians. First and foremost, revoke
1:21:36the refugee status of those who
1:21:38returned to Ukraine, for example, for
1:21:41vacations or Christmas. If they
1:21:44returned back there to Ukraine, it
1:21:46means they feel it is safe enough there
1:21:48, so they are not entitled to refugee
1:21:55status. Business Insider. Germany is
1:21:58turning away from a large group of
1:21:59immigrants. They have revoked their
1:22:01refugee status. The Federal Office for
1:22:03Migration and Refugees, or BAMF, is
1:22:05currently stripping many Syrians in
1:22:08Germany of their protection status.
1:22:11This stems from a 16-page decision from
1:22:13September, which Bild has obtained. As
1:22:17the newspaper reports, it concerns
1:22:19Syrians who have run-ins with the law
1:22:21or temporarily left Germany and then
1:22:23returned. In the document, the
1:22:26government makes three decisions. The
1:22:30granted refugee status is being revoked
1:22:33. Subsidiary protection status is not
1:22:39granted, and there are no grounds for a
1:22:41deportation ban under the Residence Act
1:22:43. As Bild writes. The BAMF identifies
1:22:49the primary reason as the fact that
1:22:52with the fall of the Assad regime, the
1:22:54civil war in Syria has ended. This is
1:22:58said to have led to a significant
1:23:00change in the factual situation.
1:23:02According to Bild, this could mean that
1:23:04the protection status of potentially
1:23:06hundreds of thousands of Syrians in
1:23:08Germany will expire. Chancellor
1:23:14Friedrich Merz pointed to a goal in the
1:23:16spring of having 80%of the more than
1:23:18900,000 Syrians living in Germany
1:23:20return to their homeland. According to
1:23:27the Taxpayers' Association's estimates,
1:23:29this involves potential savings of
1:23:31around 6 billion euros annually.
1:23:35According to the Federal Employment
1:23:37Agency's migration monitor, about
1:23:39115,000 Syrians in Germany are
1:23:41receiving social benefits. The BAMF
1:23:47believes that there is no real
1:23:49alternative power in Syria to the
1:23:51transitional government. As the
1:23:53document cited by Bild states, in the
1:23:58opinion of the BAMF, the transitional
1:24:00government controls a significant part
1:24:02of the country and is recognized
1:24:04internationally. Other groups,
1:24:08including the explicitly mentioned
1:24:10terrorist organization Islamic State (
1:24:12IS), pose a security challenge but are
1:24:14not a viable alternative power. Citing
1:24:22data from the United Nations High
1:24:25Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the
1:24:27decision notes that between the fall of
1:24:30the Assad government in December 2024
1:24:33and March 2026, over 1.5 million people
1:24:35returned to Syria. In one of the
1:24:41fragments, the BAMF presents general
1:24:44assumptions and so on and so forth. And
1:24:48so. Germany considers return possible,
1:24:50despite the difficult living conditions
1:24:52. Of course it does. Difficult living
1:24:54conditions are not a reason to apply
1:24:56for refugee status. You can only apply
1:24:59for refugee status if you are
1:25:00threatened with persecution or being
1:25:02killed. For example, because of war, in
1:25:05which case you are a war refugee, or
1:25:07because you spoke too much
1:25:08uncomfortable truth about politicians,
1:25:10then you are a political refugee.
1:25:18Germany considers return possible.
1:25:20Despite the difficult living conditions
1:25:22. According to authorities, Syria faces
1:25:24food shortages, high costs of living,
1:25:27lack of housing, and electricity supply
1:25:29problems. For a five-person family
1:25:33outside the capital, the decision
1:25:35points to costs of approximately 554
1:25:38EUR per month. Despite this, the BAMF
1:25:43considers return to be possible in
1:25:46principle. In total, therefore, there
1:25:51is no existential state of danger.
1:25:55Furthermore, the decision points to
1:25:57programs for voluntary returnees funded
1:26:00by Germany. It lists a 200 € travel
1:26:06allowance for adults and 100 € for
1:26:09those under 18 years of age. On top of
1:26:13that, there is 100 € of start-up
1:26:15assistance for every adult and 500 €
1:26:17for every child, with a total maximum
1:26:20of 4000 € per family. Without the
1:26:22threat of deportation, the lawyer
1:26:24expects a wave of lawsuits. BAMF does
1:26:28not announce deportation in its
1:26:30decision. In the last paragraph it says
1:26:35:" There is no threat of deportation
1:26:37issued, because the federal office
1:26:39lacks the required legal basis for it.
1:26:43"" Few of those affected defend
1:26:48themselves against the loss of
1:26:50protected status by legal means. For
1:26:56several weeks we have been observing a
1:26:58clear increase in the number of
1:26:59proceedings to revoke protection status
1:27:01. Ladies and gentlemen, generally
1:27:05speaking, what you need to know about
1:27:07this matter is that, well, refugee
1:27:09status can be revoked, and in principle
1:27:11, it should be revoked. The moment the
1:27:17war in Ukraine ends, temporary
1:27:18protection status for Ukrainians in
1:27:20Poland should be revoked immediately,
1:27:22they should then be invited to leave,
1:27:24and then those who have been returning
1:27:26to Ukraine for vacations should be
1:27:28deported from Poland first. Dear
1:27:32friends, my eyes are closing. I am very
1:27:35sorry. We will cover these last two
1:27:38topics in tomorrow's podcast. I
1:27:44apologize, but I work too much, or
1:27:46perhaps I am just too old and cannot
1:27:48handle working this hard. I am very
1:27:51sorry. Today, there will be a second
1:27:54podcast after 3:00 PM. It will be a
1:27:56very good interview with a very famous
1:27:58person. There will be no evening
1:28:04podcast, but we will return to this
1:28:06topic tomorrow. Best regards, take care
1:28:08, see you later. bye

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Zamach stanu w Polsce! Prokuratura Zabrała Głos! Robi Się Naprawdę Dziwnie! - Analiza Ator by wideoprezentacje, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 11,313 words across 1,788 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.