YouTube2Text

Your Natural Max Is Lower Than You Think — Transcript

by Menno Henselmans · 1,257 words · 130 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00Fitness lore says that for men our maximum muscular potential
  2. 0:04is a fat-free mass index of 25.
  3. 0:07The fat-free mass index is basically the bodybuilding equivalent of BMI,
  4. 0:11body mass index.
  5. 0:12It’s fat-free mass divided by height squared.
  6. 0:15Don't worry, you won't have to do any math in this video.
  7. 0:20The ceiling of 25
  8. 0:21comes from a 1995 paper, which found that
  9. 0:24none of even their most well trained athletes and bodybuilders
  10. 0:29that were actually natural exceeded a fat-free mass index of 25.
  11. 0:34It seemed like a hard limit based on just those data,
  12. 0:37however, this was based on a convenient sample of just 74 lifters.
  13. 0:42No matter how well trained they were, it's very unlikely that the maximum muscular
  14. 0:47human potential will be found in a sample of 74 people.
  15. 0:50What everyone ignored
  16. 0:51is that the same paper also reported the fat-free mass indices
  17. 0:55of the Mr. America winners from before steroids were in use.
  18. 0:59In this sample the average fat-free mass index was actually 25.4,
  19. 1:04and many of these lifters thus clearly exceeded the supposed limit of 25.
  20. 1:10In fact, the highest reported value was 27.7 by George Eiferman,
  21. 1:16the 1948 winner of the Mr. America contest.
  22. 1:20I would note
  23. 1:20that 1948 is a little bit sus, but the general consensus among historians
  24. 1:25is that steroids were only widely in use from about 1950 onwards.
  25. 1:30Now, in 2026, and new scientific review has reevaluated
  26. 1:34the question of what the natty max actually is for both men and women.
  27. 1:39They found that in drug tested athletes fat-free mass indices
  28. 1:43well over 25 have been reported in multiple papers.
  29. 1:46In fact, the highest purported value was 31.7,
  30. 1:50with the 97th percentile being 28.5.
  31. 1:55Personally, I'm very skeptical of these new data
  32. 1:57because drug tested does absolutely not mean lifetime natural.
  33. 2:01We recently saw how “The Juiced-up Olympics” basically failed
  34. 2:04to beat all of the limits from the supposedly natural Olympics,
  35. 2:08or at least the drug tested Olympics,
  36. 2:10and as an industry insider, I can tell you that being doped
  37. 2:14is not the exception, but it is absolutely the norm.
  38. 2:17In fact, it's widely known among athletes, and it's a statistical fact
  39. 2:21in a large sample that if you want to be the top of the top of the top,
  40. 2:24you have to do everything right.
  41. 2:26“Right” being in this case, everything that it takes to build muscle mass,
  42. 2:29and that includes doping.
  43. 2:31My skepticism of the new data aside, if we combine the new data
  44. 2:35with the old data from
  45. 2:36Mr. America winners, especially those from the 1930s, who are almost
  46. 2:39surely natural, natty max estimate of 28.5 is not unreasonable.
  47. 2:44However, it's important to realize that these data are probabilistic.
  48. 2:49Our natty max follows a normal distribution.
  49. 2:52That means that in this case,
  50. 2:53what the researchers called our natty max is the 97th percentile.
  51. 2:57This does not mean it's an absolute limit.
  52. 2:59In fact, it means, by definition, that about 3% of individuals
  53. 3:03could conceivably exceed this limit, even 28.5.
  54. 3:07Genetic outliers are a real thing.
  55. 3:10At the same time, it also means that us mortals with average genetics, or around
  56. 3:1450 percentile genetics, can only expect a fat-free mass
  57. 3:18index of about 23, based on the researchers data.
  58. 3:21Genetics can make an absolutely monumental difference, even larger than the effect
  59. 3:25of steroids in many cases.
  60. 3:27By social media standards our factory mass index of 23
  61. 3:30might seem paltry, a true disappointment for the end of your fitness journey.
  62. 3:34However, if you're lucky, you'll end up looking like Steve Reeves.
  63. 3:38Esthetics legend Steve Reeves actually had a fat-free mass index
  64. 3:41of only 23. So if you're lucky, and you have God tier bone structure,
  65. 3:46you'll look like him.
  66. 3:47If you're less lucky, you'll look like me.
  67. 3:48My fat-free mass index in contest shape was 23.6.
  68. 3:52I do suspect Steve's fat-free mass index was actually closer to 25,
  69. 3:56because his body fat was tested by calipers,
  70. 3:58but then again he wasn't that lean.
  71. 4:00And we know that as you get leaner, your fat-free mass index potential decreases.
  72. 4:04For the ladies, I suspect I have better news.
  73. 4:06The natural maximum muscular potential of men
  74. 4:08and women seems to be the same, at least in relative terms.
  75. 4:12However, women obviously start off with around 30% less fat-free mass index.
  76. 4:17That means that their natty Max is not 28.5, but 23.5,
  77. 4:22with most women that have more average genetics ending up closer to 20.
  78. 4:26If you're interested what your drug-free maximum muscular potential
  79. 4:30likely is, I've made a calculator for you on my website.
  80. 4:33The calculator relies on two key inputs.
  81. 4:35Based on research,
  82. 4:36there are two clear determinants of your natty max:
  83. 4:40your body fat percentage and your frame size.
  84. 4:43Body fat percentage
  85. 4:44is commonly ignored in these discussions, and also in the research
  86. 4:47on the new athletes having a fat-free mass index, sometimes over 30,
  87. 4:51these are often American football players that are much higher in body fat level.
  88. 4:55Sumo wrestlers, in fact,
  89. 4:56have some of the highest fat-free mass indices that we see in the literature.
  90. 5:00However, they don't look that muscular because they're also quite fat.
  91. 5:03The cleanest comparison, and therefore the most reliable estimate,
  92. 5:06is when you are in contest shape, or at least the contest shape
  93. 5:09of the Mr. America winners from the 1930s and 40s.
  94. 5:12Skeletal frame size is also incredibly important.
  95. 5:15Your skeletal frame size functions essentially like a coat rack
  96. 5:18that determines how much clothes you can put on the frame,
  97. 5:22or in our case, how much muscle you can put on the skeleton.
  98. 5:25Now, before you use the calculator a word of warning.
  99. 5:28Most people want to know their natty max for the wrong reasons.
  100. 5:31They want to see if someone is natural, or they want to see how they do
  101. 5:34in comparison.
  102. 5:35It's like a school when someone asks: “How did you do on your test?”
  103. 5:38Most people aren't actually interested in how the other person did.
  104. 5:41They're interested in how they did in comparison.
  105. 5:43But comparison is the thief of joy.
  106. 5:46What research finds is that when you have a performance mindset or a goal
  107. 5:51relative to someone else, that often doesn't lead to long term happiness.
  108. 5:55Instead, what you want is a growth mindset.
  109. 5:57In our case, literally a growth mindset
  110. 5:59in terms of muscle growth, but also psychologically
  111. 6:01a growth mindset in terms of self-improvement, personal development.
  112. 6:05You want to be better than you were before.
  113. 6:08So all that really matters is where you were before, where you are now,
  114. 6:12and that you are moving in the right direction.
  115. 6:14These are the things that ultimately matter for you, not so much
  116. 6:18how muscular someone else is, because that is outside of your control.
  117. 6:21So it is best to focus on your own development and to see your natty max
  118. 6:25estimate merely as a rough guideline of where you could possibly end up at,
  119. 6:31with the most actionable implementation of that being how advanced you
  120. 6:34currently are.
  121. 6:35It gives you the best estimate of whether you are currently a novice,
  122. 6:39intermediate, or advanced lifter, which actually has implications
  123. 6:42for how you should train.
  124. 6:44Beyond that, it is mostly just a number that doesn't
  125. 6:47actually change what you should be doing to get more muscular and leaner.
  126. 6:51All that said, the link to the calculator
  127. 6:52should be popping up on your screen right about now,
  128. 6:54and you can also find it in the description.
  129. 6:57I hope this video helps you with your fitness journey.
  130. 7:00See you next time!

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Your Natural Max Is Lower Than You Think by Menno Henselmans, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,257 words across 130 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.