YouTube2Text

You can only save one— who do you choose? - Doug MacKay — Transcript

by TED-Ed · 650 words · 70 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:06You are the captain of the Mallory 7, an interstellar cargo transport.
  2. 0:11On your way to the New Lindley spaceport, you receive a distress call.
  3. 0:16There’s been an explosion on the Telic 12
  4. 0:19and its passengers are running out of oxygen.
  5. 0:21As you set a course to intercept, you check the Telic 12′s manifest.
  6. 0:26It’s currently transporting 30 middle-aged individuals
  7. 0:29from some of Earth’s poorest districts to the labor center on New Lindley,
  8. 0:33where they'll be assigned jobs on the spaceport.
  9. 0:36But as you approach the Telic 12, you receive a second distress call.
  10. 0:40A luxury space cruiser called the Pareto has lost a thruster,
  11. 0:44sending them careening towards an asteroid belt.
  12. 0:47Without your help, the 20 college students headed for vacation
  13. 0:51aboard the Pareto are all doomed.
  14. 0:54So with only enough time to save one ship, which one should you choose?
  15. 1:00This dilemma is an example of a broader class of problems
  16. 1:03where a life-saving resource— such as a donated organ or vaccine—
  17. 1:08is scarce.
  18. 1:09There are many schools of thought on how to approach these problems,
  19. 1:12and one of the most influential is utilitarianism,
  20. 1:15an ethical view first systematically developed
  21. 1:18by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.
  22. 1:21In this view, you should choose the action
  23. 1:23which promises the greatest sum of happiness.
  24. 1:26Though, how to define and measure happiness is a difficult question.
  25. 1:30For example, hedonists would suggest a happy life
  26. 1:33contains the most pleasure and the least pain.
  27. 1:36Others might say it’s the life where your desires are most fulfilled.
  28. 1:40However happiness is defined,
  29. 1:42most would agree that saving 30 lives has the potential
  30. 1:46to generate more happiness than saving 20.
  31. 1:49But is it enough to consider how many lives would be saved?
  32. 1:53Or should you also consider how many life years would be?
  33. 1:57Assuming a life expectancy of 80, saving the lives of the students,
  34. 2:01with an average age of 20, saves 1,200 life years,
  35. 2:05while saving the workers, with an average age of 45, saves 1,050.
  36. 2:11All things being equal, a longer life should promise
  37. 2:14a greater sum of happiness than a shorter one.
  38. 2:18So perhaps saving the smaller ship actually has the potential
  39. 2:21to generate the most happiness.
  40. 2:24If all these calculations feel a bit cold,
  41. 2:26you may want to consider a different approach.
  42. 2:29The philosopher Derek Parfit argues we should give priority to the worse off,
  43. 2:33since benefits to those groups matter more
  44. 2:36than equivalent benefits to the well-off.
  45. 2:39In this view, it’s more urgent to help those whose basic needs aren’t met
  46. 2:43even if they’re harder to help than those who are flourishing.
  47. 2:47But often, determining which group is truly worse off can get complicated fast.
  48. 2:52In our case, Earth is still beset by drastic inequalities
  49. 2:56in wealth and opportunity.
  50. 2:58And those able to afford a vacation on New Lindley
  51. 3:01and transport on a luxury cruiser
  52. 3:03are no doubt among the most well-off people on the planet.
  53. 3:07The workers, by contrast, are among the most disadvantaged,
  54. 3:11traveling away from home for months at a time to perform service work.
  55. 3:15With fewer resources and opportunities,
  56. 3:17it’s likely they’ve experienced more hardship in their lives
  57. 3:20than the vacationers,
  58. 3:21so maybe they’re more deserving of rescue?
  59. 3:23On the other hand, the students have experienced less life overall—
  60. 3:27so perhaps they’re worse off?
  61. 3:29Or maybe none of these variables should influence our decision.
  62. 3:33The philosopher John Taurek famously argued that in these types of cases,
  63. 3:37the numbers don’t count.
  64. 3:40Each person is deserving of equal concern and respect,
  65. 3:44so the best way to decide which passengers to save is to flip a coin.
  66. 3:48While this might seem arbitrary at first, this approach treats all parties equally,
  67. 3:53giving each individual an equal chance of being rescued.
  68. 3:57Could any passenger argue that they're being treated unfairly by a coin flip?
  69. 4:02It’s tough to say.
  70. 4:04But how they— and you— feel about the result may be another dilemma altogether.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of You can only save one— who do you choose? - Doug MacKay by TED-Ed, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 650 words across 70 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.