YouTube2Text

Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations | Alain de Botton — Transcript

by Big Think Clips · 1,777 words · 105 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00It used to be the case that when people found  partners, they would do so according to fairly
  2. 0:05pragmatic considerations. Couples were  formed not by the individuals themselves,
  3. 0:10but by the wider society. There were, if you like,  dynastic marriages. There was then a momentous
  4. 0:18change that occurs towards the end of the 18th  century that we now know as romanticism. And
  5. 0:24one of the central tenets of romanticism is that  each individual should be left to decide on their
  6. 0:30partner by their own, the movements of their  own heart. It's a beautiful idea, it's a very
  7. 0:37liberating idea. And let's put it plainly, it's  been a disaster. We are not any appreciably
  8. 0:45happier now in a romantic culture than we were  in a dynastic culture. And why? Because we live
  9. 0:53in a romantic culture that sees something adverse  in planning and thinking and reflecting too hard
  10. 1:01on the business of love. And it's been a serious  problem for humanity. My name is Alain de Botton,
  11. 1:06I'm a philosopher, psychotherapist and founder of  the School of Life. The unique challenge of modern
  12. 1:14dating. We know in theory that love matters a lot.  It's in every pop song, it's the centre of most
  13. 1:22religions. We sometimes lose sight of what that  word actually means. It's really about connection.
  14. 1:29And it is one of the most beautiful and one of the  most complicated of all phenomena. Even though we
  15. 1:36think we've been around on this planet for  a long time trying to figure things out,
  16. 1:39I'd say we were still at the dawn, collectively,  of making sense of this phenomenon we call love.
  17. 1:46And it's no surprise that most people will go to  their deathbeds thinking, "Not quite sure I've
  18. 1:53figured that side of life out. "At least many  of us will still be grappling "with some of the
  19. 1:59complexities of love "by the time time runs out  on us." The most central kind of love that people
  20. 2:06are obsessed about, concerned about, is romantic  love. That is the intimate connection between two
  21. 2:13human beings who have a sexual contact. It's worth  saying that there are other forms of love. We can
  22. 2:21love our children, we can love animals, we can  love ideas, we can love tables, chairs, clouds,
  23. 2:29all sorts of things. We are capable of many forms  of love. But I'd say that when people sing about
  24. 2:34love and when they cry about love, it tends  to be the love of one very special person we
  25. 2:41tend to call our soulmate, our partner. It used  to be the case that when people found partners,
  26. 2:47they would do so according to fairly pragmatic  considerations. In most nations and most parts
  27. 2:53of the world, for most of history, couples  were formed not by the individuals themselves,
  28. 2:58but by the wider society, families, the  village, the court. There were, if you like,
  29. 3:05dynastic marriages. You would get together with  somebody because they had a plow and you had an
  30. 3:11ox and it seemed like a good match, or you were  the Duke of Brabant and they were the Princess
  31. 3:16of Naples and that was seen as a wonderful union.  So you got together for reasons that were nothing
  32. 3:23to do with emotional compatibility. There were  a lot of tears, there was sadness, there was
  33. 3:28loneliness, but it didn't seem to matter because  relationships were seen to be about something
  34. 3:33else. There was then a momentous change that  occurs in towards the end of the 18th century,
  35. 3:40starting in Britain, France, Germany, parts of  Italy, a revolution in feeling that we now know
  36. 3:48as romanticism. And one of the central tenets  of romanticism is that each individual should
  37. 3:54be left to decide on their partner by their own,  the movements of their own heart. They should be
  38. 4:01left to decide for themselves. It's a beautiful  idea, it's a very liberating idea, it should make
  39. 4:08a lot of sense. And we have been in the romantic  age now for, you know, 200 years, perhaps shorter,
  40. 4:16perhaps a little longer, that kind of time period.  And let's put it plainly, it's been a disaster.
  41. 4:22We are not any appreciably happier now in a  romantic culture than we were in a dynastic
  42. 4:30culture where marriages were made for dynastic  reasons. Why? Because we have failed collectively
  43. 4:37to focus with enough intent on the difficulties  that couples will have when they choose each
  44. 4:43other according to the movements of their own  heart. Look, I think a really key prejudice of
  45. 4:50the romantic worldview is that if love is working  well, it should be following instinct. There's
  46. 4:57been an enormous veneration, almost a worship of  instinct. Love is described as a special feeling,
  47. 5:04not an asset of ideas, not a sense of rationally  observable principles, but a feeling. You either
  48. 5:08have the feeling or you don't. You must be guided  by your feeling. There's even a prejudice against
  49. 5:13language. You know, true lovers shouldn't talk  too much. They should just feel the flattering
  50. 5:18of their own hearts. That's why music has a huge  prestige, higher than, you know, philosophy. When
  51. 5:24we're in love, we don't want to read philosophical  tracks, we want to hear love songs. That is to do
  52. 5:29with our sense that emotion should be guiding us,  not reason. Reason is the enemy in the romantic
  53. 5:35worldview of truly happy relationships. If you  follow reason, that's cold, it may be calculating,
  54. 5:42it's unromantic. And, you know, there are so  many things that are considered unromantic. And
  55. 5:49I would love to train our audience that every time  something seems unromantic, question it. Is it
  56. 5:55truly unromantic if we define romanticism as the  pursuit of a workable relationship? On that basis,
  57. 6:04is it unromantic to talk about money? Is it  unromantic to think long and hard about childhood
  58. 6:11patterns of psychological development? Is it  anti-romantic to spend a lot of time thinking
  59. 6:18about families and friends and compatibility  at that level? All these things, in my view,
  60. 6:23belong to a truly adequate way of surveying  whether a couple should be together. But I'm also
  61. 6:29aware that nowadays these things are considered  very unromantic. To live in a romantic culture
  62. 6:35means to live in a culture that has a set of ideas  about how good couples should form. They should be
  63. 6:41formed by instinct, that everybody has a soulmate,  that you'll recognise your soulmate by a special
  64. 6:46flattery feeling, that you shouldn't be asked to  account for that feeling. You should simply go
  65. 6:51for it and marry in Vegas in two weeks if that's  what seizes you. And that you should be able to
  66. 6:57communicate deeply with your partner without using  language through that special medium of the heart,
  67. 7:03through the silence. Also that you shouldn't  criticise your partner, that true partners
  68. 7:09should love each other for who they really are,  which means no desire to grow or change. You just
  69. 7:16accept someone. Couples in romantic culture will  sometimes complain, "You're trying to change me."
  70. 7:22And this is seen as really offensive. It's like,  "What? You complain to your friends. My partner is
  71. 7:28trying to change me." "Oh, what an awful person.  This must be awful. You must get out immediately."
  72. 7:34If you went to an ancient Greek, if you went  to Athens in 400 BC, and you said to an ancient
  73. 7:40Greek, "What is love? And where is the role of  criticism?" They would say, "Love is a process
  74. 7:46of education. It's the education of emotion. And  lovers should of course be able to pick each other
  75. 7:53up for things that they don't spot in one another.  And they should be trying to develop into the best
  76. 7:59version of themselves, rather than simply staying  stuck in an admiration for who they are today. The
  77. 8:05whole process should be dynamic. Become who  you could be, not worship who you happen to
  78. 8:10be right now. All of this sounds very strange in  romantic culture, which is why relationships are
  79. 8:17so difficult in our time. Let's remember that  a person's life satisfaction is determined by
  80. 8:24up to around 70% by the quality of their personal  relationships. A Martian hearing that statistic,
  81. 8:33visiting planet Earth, would think, "Well,  clearly, Earthlings, given the enormous role
  82. 8:38of love, will be spending 70% of their money and  70% of their educational time working out how on
  83. 8:43Earth this business of love works. Is that true?"  "No. We spend hardly any time rationally thinking
  84. 8:50about it. None of us are made to sit through  classes in attachment theory, classes in apology,
  85. 8:56classes in listening, classes in communication.  No, physics is important, geography is important.
  86. 9:02Don't get me wrong. But is there no time for this,  given its role in our lives? Do we really want to
  87. 9:07leave this to chance? And the answer is yes. And  why? Because we live in a romantic culture that
  88. 9:14sees something adverse in planning and thinking  and reflecting too hard on the business of love.
  89. 9:21It's very deleterious and it's been a serious  problem for humanity. One of the most powerful
  90. 9:27disseminators of romantic culture is art. And by  art, I mean all the leading artistic media. Film,
  91. 9:33definitely. You know, if you were learning about  love from films, you would be very confused. And
  92. 9:39that's why many of us are confused, because films,  and I include that television shows and other,
  93. 9:44you know, narrative forms, these things are hugely  misleading. They simply do not show what a real
  94. 9:52relationship is like. I mean, probably you can  count on one hand that the number of films that
  95. 9:58have accurately shown love, I think one of the  most accurate representations of love is Richard
  96. 10:02Linklater's "Before Trilogy", which ended up with  "Before Midnight". It's a wonderful reckoning,
  97. 10:08really, with the real complexities of love. But,  you know, most films are not that. Most films are
  98. 10:13blithe, are superficial, are not modest enough  in showing us what's really going on between
  99. 10:19couples. It's also intimidated through music. And  music constantly gives us little miniature stories
  100. 10:26about, you know, how love works. And, you know,  the music is terrific, but it's not accurate to
  101. 10:31what's going on. And it presses the wrong buttons.  Poetry, no one really reads poetry nowadays. If
  102. 10:38they did, the problem exists in poetry too. So we  have so much media around, and yet we're still so
  103. 10:45much strangers to ourselves. I would say that the  single greatest, most misleading disseminator of
  104. 10:50ideas on love is culture and art. The problem is  very heavily located there. - Want to support the
  105. 11:02channel? Join the Big Think members community  where you get access to videos early, ad free.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations | Alain de Botton by Big Think Clips, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,777 words across 105 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.