Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations | Alain de Botton — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00It used to be the case that when people found partners, they would do so according to fairly
- 0:05pragmatic considerations. Couples were formed not by the individuals themselves,
- 0:10but by the wider society. There were, if you like, dynastic marriages. There was then a momentous
- 0:18change that occurs towards the end of the 18th century that we now know as romanticism. And
- 0:24one of the central tenets of romanticism is that each individual should be left to decide on their
- 0:30partner by their own, the movements of their own heart. It's a beautiful idea, it's a very
- 0:37liberating idea. And let's put it plainly, it's been a disaster. We are not any appreciably
- 0:45happier now in a romantic culture than we were in a dynastic culture. And why? Because we live
- 0:53in a romantic culture that sees something adverse in planning and thinking and reflecting too hard
- 1:01on the business of love. And it's been a serious problem for humanity. My name is Alain de Botton,
- 1:06I'm a philosopher, psychotherapist and founder of the School of Life. The unique challenge of modern
- 1:14dating. We know in theory that love matters a lot. It's in every pop song, it's the centre of most
- 1:22religions. We sometimes lose sight of what that word actually means. It's really about connection.
- 1:29And it is one of the most beautiful and one of the most complicated of all phenomena. Even though we
- 1:36think we've been around on this planet for a long time trying to figure things out,
- 1:39I'd say we were still at the dawn, collectively, of making sense of this phenomenon we call love.
- 1:46And it's no surprise that most people will go to their deathbeds thinking, "Not quite sure I've
- 1:53figured that side of life out. "At least many of us will still be grappling "with some of the
- 1:59complexities of love "by the time time runs out on us." The most central kind of love that people
- 2:06are obsessed about, concerned about, is romantic love. That is the intimate connection between two
- 2:13human beings who have a sexual contact. It's worth saying that there are other forms of love. We can
- 2:21love our children, we can love animals, we can love ideas, we can love tables, chairs, clouds,
- 2:29all sorts of things. We are capable of many forms of love. But I'd say that when people sing about
- 2:34love and when they cry about love, it tends to be the love of one very special person we
- 2:41tend to call our soulmate, our partner. It used to be the case that when people found partners,
- 2:47they would do so according to fairly pragmatic considerations. In most nations and most parts
- 2:53of the world, for most of history, couples were formed not by the individuals themselves,
- 2:58but by the wider society, families, the village, the court. There were, if you like,
- 3:05dynastic marriages. You would get together with somebody because they had a plow and you had an
- 3:11ox and it seemed like a good match, or you were the Duke of Brabant and they were the Princess
- 3:16of Naples and that was seen as a wonderful union. So you got together for reasons that were nothing
- 3:23to do with emotional compatibility. There were a lot of tears, there was sadness, there was
- 3:28loneliness, but it didn't seem to matter because relationships were seen to be about something
- 3:33else. There was then a momentous change that occurs in towards the end of the 18th century,
- 3:40starting in Britain, France, Germany, parts of Italy, a revolution in feeling that we now know
- 3:48as romanticism. And one of the central tenets of romanticism is that each individual should
- 3:54be left to decide on their partner by their own, the movements of their own heart. They should be
- 4:01left to decide for themselves. It's a beautiful idea, it's a very liberating idea, it should make
- 4:08a lot of sense. And we have been in the romantic age now for, you know, 200 years, perhaps shorter,
- 4:16perhaps a little longer, that kind of time period. And let's put it plainly, it's been a disaster.
- 4:22We are not any appreciably happier now in a romantic culture than we were in a dynastic
- 4:30culture where marriages were made for dynastic reasons. Why? Because we have failed collectively
- 4:37to focus with enough intent on the difficulties that couples will have when they choose each
- 4:43other according to the movements of their own heart. Look, I think a really key prejudice of
- 4:50the romantic worldview is that if love is working well, it should be following instinct. There's
- 4:57been an enormous veneration, almost a worship of instinct. Love is described as a special feeling,
- 5:04not an asset of ideas, not a sense of rationally observable principles, but a feeling. You either
- 5:08have the feeling or you don't. You must be guided by your feeling. There's even a prejudice against
- 5:13language. You know, true lovers shouldn't talk too much. They should just feel the flattering
- 5:18of their own hearts. That's why music has a huge prestige, higher than, you know, philosophy. When
- 5:24we're in love, we don't want to read philosophical tracks, we want to hear love songs. That is to do
- 5:29with our sense that emotion should be guiding us, not reason. Reason is the enemy in the romantic
- 5:35worldview of truly happy relationships. If you follow reason, that's cold, it may be calculating,
- 5:42it's unromantic. And, you know, there are so many things that are considered unromantic. And
- 5:49I would love to train our audience that every time something seems unromantic, question it. Is it
- 5:55truly unromantic if we define romanticism as the pursuit of a workable relationship? On that basis,
- 6:04is it unromantic to talk about money? Is it unromantic to think long and hard about childhood
- 6:11patterns of psychological development? Is it anti-romantic to spend a lot of time thinking
- 6:18about families and friends and compatibility at that level? All these things, in my view,
- 6:23belong to a truly adequate way of surveying whether a couple should be together. But I'm also
- 6:29aware that nowadays these things are considered very unromantic. To live in a romantic culture
- 6:35means to live in a culture that has a set of ideas about how good couples should form. They should be
- 6:41formed by instinct, that everybody has a soulmate, that you'll recognise your soulmate by a special
- 6:46flattery feeling, that you shouldn't be asked to account for that feeling. You should simply go
- 6:51for it and marry in Vegas in two weeks if that's what seizes you. And that you should be able to
- 6:57communicate deeply with your partner without using language through that special medium of the heart,
- 7:03through the silence. Also that you shouldn't criticise your partner, that true partners
- 7:09should love each other for who they really are, which means no desire to grow or change. You just
- 7:16accept someone. Couples in romantic culture will sometimes complain, "You're trying to change me."
- 7:22And this is seen as really offensive. It's like, "What? You complain to your friends. My partner is
- 7:28trying to change me." "Oh, what an awful person. This must be awful. You must get out immediately."
- 7:34If you went to an ancient Greek, if you went to Athens in 400 BC, and you said to an ancient
- 7:40Greek, "What is love? And where is the role of criticism?" They would say, "Love is a process
- 7:46of education. It's the education of emotion. And lovers should of course be able to pick each other
- 7:53up for things that they don't spot in one another. And they should be trying to develop into the best
- 7:59version of themselves, rather than simply staying stuck in an admiration for who they are today. The
- 8:05whole process should be dynamic. Become who you could be, not worship who you happen to
- 8:10be right now. All of this sounds very strange in romantic culture, which is why relationships are
- 8:17so difficult in our time. Let's remember that a person's life satisfaction is determined by
- 8:24up to around 70% by the quality of their personal relationships. A Martian hearing that statistic,
- 8:33visiting planet Earth, would think, "Well, clearly, Earthlings, given the enormous role
- 8:38of love, will be spending 70% of their money and 70% of their educational time working out how on
- 8:43Earth this business of love works. Is that true?" "No. We spend hardly any time rationally thinking
- 8:50about it. None of us are made to sit through classes in attachment theory, classes in apology,
- 8:56classes in listening, classes in communication. No, physics is important, geography is important.
- 9:02Don't get me wrong. But is there no time for this, given its role in our lives? Do we really want to
- 9:07leave this to chance? And the answer is yes. And why? Because we live in a romantic culture that
- 9:14sees something adverse in planning and thinking and reflecting too hard on the business of love.
- 9:21It's very deleterious and it's been a serious problem for humanity. One of the most powerful
- 9:27disseminators of romantic culture is art. And by art, I mean all the leading artistic media. Film,
- 9:33definitely. You know, if you were learning about love from films, you would be very confused. And
- 9:39that's why many of us are confused, because films, and I include that television shows and other,
- 9:44you know, narrative forms, these things are hugely misleading. They simply do not show what a real
- 9:52relationship is like. I mean, probably you can count on one hand that the number of films that
- 9:58have accurately shown love, I think one of the most accurate representations of love is Richard
- 10:02Linklater's "Before Trilogy", which ended up with "Before Midnight". It's a wonderful reckoning,
- 10:08really, with the real complexities of love. But, you know, most films are not that. Most films are
- 10:13blithe, are superficial, are not modest enough in showing us what's really going on between
- 10:19couples. It's also intimidated through music. And music constantly gives us little miniature stories
- 10:26about, you know, how love works. And, you know, the music is terrific, but it's not accurate to
- 10:31what's going on. And it presses the wrong buttons. Poetry, no one really reads poetry nowadays. If
- 10:38they did, the problem exists in poetry too. So we have so much media around, and yet we're still so
- 10:45much strangers to ourselves. I would say that the single greatest, most misleading disseminator of
- 10:50ideas on love is culture and art. The problem is very heavily located there. - Want to support the
- 11:02channel? Join the Big Think members community where you get access to videos early, ad free.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations | Alain de Botton by Big Think Clips, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,777 words across 105 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.