Why Pattern Trading Fails Most Traders — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Let me show you something that has
- 0:02probably happened to you before. Right
- 0:04here we have a very clear resistance
- 0:06level. Price pushes into it once, comes
- 0:08back to retest it. This is what traders
- 0:11would call a double top. Now, when a
- 0:14trader, especially maybe a breakout
- 0:16trader, might see this type of setup,
- 0:18the explanation is pretty simple. The
- 0:20idea would be that if price comes up and
- 0:22breaks this level, the market should
- 0:24move higher, and it should probably take
- 0:27out at least this high. I mean, that's
- 0:29what breakout traders are probably
- 0:30thinking. So, they're sitting here
- 0:32waiting exactly for that to happen. Now,
- 0:34as price moves up,
- 0:37we get the break. We start breaking past
- 0:39the level.
- 0:42Now, at this point, breakout traders may
- 0:44be entering into this trade to have a
- 0:46continuation for us to push higher, to
- 0:48at least take these highs and maybe
- 0:50continue momentum further up. The
- 0:52pattern looks clean, the breakout looks
- 0:55legitimate, we're picking up some speed,
- 0:56it looks like, but instead of
- 0:58continuation,
- 1:01the breakout fails.
- 1:03We never take the highs, we never
- 1:04continue higher, and price essentially
- 1:06immediately reverses. And suddenly, all
- 1:09of those traders who try to enter in on
- 1:11the breakout right here are trapped. So,
- 1:13I guess the question would be, if the
- 1:15pattern was correct, and if the breakout
- 1:18was real, why did it fail?
- 1:21Because patterns don't move markets,
- 1:23participation does. And this is the
- 1:26mistake that a lot of traders make when
- 1:27they're learning how to trade. They
- 1:29treat patterns like they cause price to
- 1:31move, but patterns are just shapes, and
- 1:33they're just descriptions of what price
- 1:35already did. They don't tell you who's
- 1:37actually participating in the market.
- 1:39And to understand that, we need to talk
- 1:41about how markets actually function. So,
- 1:44before we go any further, we need to
- 1:46understand something that's fundamental.
- 1:49The market isn't just a chart, it's not
- 1:51just candlesticks on a canvas, it is an
- 1:53auction. And if you don't understand how
- 1:55auctions work, it's very easy to
- 1:57misinterpret what you're seeing on the
- 1:59chart. So, a lot of traders approach
- 2:01trading with the idea of basically
- 2:03pattern preference trading, or trading
- 2:05patterns that they see, whether that
- 2:06might be double tops, head and
- 2:08shoulders, trend lines, whatever it
- 2:10might be. Now, most traders think that
- 2:13patterns move markets. They don't,
- 2:16participation moves markets. And so,
- 2:18almost every trader they start the same
- 2:20way, right? Breakout, support flips,
- 2:22head and shoulders, trend lines, and you
- 2:24start applying them. You learn these
- 2:26patterns and you try to apply them in
- 2:28your trading, and the logic feels solid,
- 2:30and the chart seems to confirm it when
- 2:32you go back and you back test it, maybe,
- 2:34and you find a setup that might check
- 2:36every single box, and you take the trade
- 2:38and it still fails. So, you find another
- 2:40one, same result. The pattern looked
- 2:42right, the entry looked clean, but the
- 2:43trade didn't actually work. So, this
- 2:46isn't necessarily like a discipline
- 2:49problem or a timing issue. This is a
- 2:51structural problem with how the trade
- 2:53was actually built. The setup is based
- 2:55on a shape on a screen, not on what was
- 2:57actually happening inside the market at
- 2:59that moment. And that gap between what
- 3:02the chart shows you and what is actually
- 3:03driving prices is where most trading
- 3:05accounts quietly bleed out. And so, the
- 3:07question worth sitting with is simple.
- 3:10If the pattern was correct, and we trade
- 3:12patterns, why did the trade fail? The
- 3:14answer changes how you think about every
- 3:16chart you look at from this point
- 3:17forward. So, the idea is this, right?
- 3:22Pattern trading feels like it should
- 3:23work. It makes sense, it's intuitive.
- 3:26That's exactly why it's so hard to see
- 3:28the flaw. Now, the standard path in
- 3:30trading, and what most videos online are
- 3:32going to show you or try and tell you,
- 3:35is that people are looking for pattern
- 3:37recognition, head and shoulders,
- 3:39breakouts, things like that, fair value
- 3:41gaps, trend lines, all of those. Now,
- 3:43these are tools that every new trader
- 3:45actually learns first. It's like the
- 3:47first videos that you'll find if you go
- 3:49on YouTube and you start looking up
- 3:50trading. And the logic behind them makes
- 3:53sense, it feels airtight, because when
- 3:55the pattern appears, then the idea or
- 3:57the assumption is that price should
- 3:58follow. It makes sense, and that's what
- 4:01makes it so convincing. Now, this
- 4:03creates something called pattern
- 4:05preference trading. The trader is going
- 4:07to trust the pattern, and they're going
- 4:09to assume that the market is going to
- 4:10respect it. But the market has no
- 4:13awareness of this pattern. The pattern
- 4:14is a description of what already
- 4:16happened on the chart. It's not a
- 4:18mechanism that actually is going to
- 4:19cause price to move. The gap between how
- 4:22logical it feels and how the market
- 4:24actually works is where most losses
- 4:27might come from. So, if the pattern
- 4:29appears, price should move. Well, that's
- 4:31the assumption that most retail traders
- 4:33take, and it causes losses, and it's
- 4:37wrong at a structural level. It's not
- 4:39about patterns. A lot of traders will
- 4:42follow this exact belief model. A
- 4:45pattern appears on the chart, they
- 4:47assume that it means the pattern is
- 4:48going to predict the direction, and that
- 4:50price should follow that. But we're
- 4:53missing actual market participation, and
- 4:56that's the missing element. It's the
- 4:58only element that actually determines
- 5:00price direction, cuz without it, the
- 5:02pattern is just going to be a shape on a
- 5:04screen. Now, we have to think about this
- 5:07in terms of cause and effect. The
- 5:09problem isn't that patterns exist.
- 5:13They exist, the problem is that traders
- 5:15believe patterns cause price movement. A
- 5:18breakout pattern does not cause price to
- 5:20move, buying causes the breakout. This
- 5:23reversal is not a subtle distinction, it
- 5:25changes how you read every chart, every
- 5:27setup, and every failure, and the
- 5:29mistake is con- fusing description with
- 5:31causation. So, when traders interpret
- 5:33patterns as a signal of what the
- 5:34market's going to do, they're going to
- 5:36treat it as an effect as if it were a
- 5:38cause. The chart tells you what
- 5:40happened, but it has no predictive power
- 5:42on its own, though.
- 5:44Now, look at two examples here, okay?
- 5:46Now, look at how the same price movement
- 5:48is explained under each of these models.
- 5:49We have what most traders believe. A
- 5:52breakout pattern appears, pattern causes
- 5:54buying, and price rises. Now, what's
- 5:57actually happening is aggressive buyers
- 5:59are lifting offers, available liquidity
- 6:01is being consumed, and price rises. The
- 6:04pattern appears after the buying, not
- 6:06before it. And trading the pattern as
- 6:08the signal is meaning that you're
- 6:10reacting to an effect and calling it a
- 6:12cause. So, what actually moves the
- 6:14markets then? Because if patterns don't
- 6:15move price, then what does? Well,
- 6:17markets are moving when participants are
- 6:19transacting aggressively. That's it.
- 6:21It's not when a pattern is going to
- 6:23complete, it's not when a level is being
- 6:25touched. Price changes direction when
- 6:27one side of the market, either buyers or
- 6:29sellers, is willing to cross the spread
- 6:32and take the liquidity with enough
- 6:33urgency to overwhelm the other side, and
- 6:36understanding that single idea is the
- 6:38foundation for everything that follows.
- 6:41The market is not a chart, necessarily,
- 6:44it is an auction. And once you start
- 6:46reading it that way, the entire picture
- 6:49is going to change. So, the idea of
- 6:51markets being an auction, it is a
- 6:53continuous two-sided auction between
- 6:55buyers and sellers. So, every tick is a
- 6:57negotiation on price. Buyers and sellers
- 7:00compete to transact, and price moves in
- 7:02the direction of whoever is willing to
- 7:03be more aggressive. There are two
- 7:05distinct types of participants in this
- 7:08process. So, if we look at the diagram
- 7:10below that shows these two roles, we're
- 7:13going to understand the difference
- 7:14between them, and understanding it is
- 7:16essential. So, the first type of
- 7:18participant is going to be an initiative
- 7:20trader. This is someone who moves price.
- 7:23They need to transact, meaning that
- 7:26they're going to lift offers to buy, and
- 7:28they're going to hit bids to sell, and
- 7:31they're willing to accept worse prices
- 7:33to get filled, and their urgency is the
- 7:35market moving. Now, the other type of
- 7:38trader that we have are responsive
- 7:40traders. These are the types of traders
- 7:42that are providing liquidity at price
- 7:43extremes. So, they're selling into
- 7:45buying, they're buying into selling, and
- 7:47they're fading price when it's moved too
- 7:49far. Their presence stops or reverses
- 7:52moves, and price movement is determined
- 7:54entirely by which side overwhelms the
- 7:57other, and no pattern is going to decide
- 8:00this, only actual orders in the market
- 8:03decide this. So, initiative buyers are
- 8:06the people creating the move. Responsive
- 8:08sellers are the people absorbing it, and
- 8:10every trade you take, you need to know
- 8:12which side you're lined with, and
- 8:14whether that side is winning. And the
- 8:16way that we think about this, or we
- 8:18should be thinking about this, is effort
- 8:20versus result. Aggression alone doesn't
- 8:23necessarily move markets, unabsorbed
- 8:26aggression does. And this is the moment
- 8:28where
- 8:29most traders misread the market. You
- 8:31might see heavy volume and assume the
- 8:33move is real, but the heavy buying does
- 8:35not guarantee that price is going to go
- 8:37up. What matters is whether buying is
- 8:39being absorbed by something on the other
- 8:40side. Now, the two scenarios that I'm
- 8:43about to show below are going to look
- 8:46identical on a standard chart, and only
- 8:48the relationship between the effort and
- 8:50the result reveals what's actually
- 8:52happening. In scenario A, where we have
- 8:54buyers in control, okay? We have heavy
- 8:57buying pressure that enters. The offers
- 8:59are being lifted consistently, and price
- 9:01is advancing with each trade, so that
- 9:04effort or that aggression is being
- 9:06rewarded with price movement. In
- 9:08scenario B, there is an absorption
- 9:10warning. We have heavy buying pressure
- 9:12that enters the market, we have large
- 9:14volume prints, and price is barely
- 9:16moving. It's stalling, or it's getting
- 9:19ready to rotate, potentially. Now, that
- 9:21means that something on the other side
- 9:24is absorbing, and a reversal could be
- 9:26likely. Now, it's not guaranteed,
- 9:29because just because absorption is
- 9:31happening doesn't necessarily mean that
- 9:33a reversal is going to follow, but it is
- 9:36something that we need to think about.
- 9:37Now, when heavy buying fails to move
- 9:40price, it's informative, and we need to
- 9:42take note of it, because something large
- 9:44is on the other side of every single one
- 9:46of those trades. The buyers are pressing
- 9:48in, and they're getting trapped. They're
- 9:49running their head essentially into a
- 9:51wall. Now, this is exactly the
- 9:54difference between reading effort and
- 9:56reading result. On a normal candlestick
- 9:59chart, both scenarios can produce an
- 10:02identical looking candle and only order
- 10:05flow tools are going to reveal which one
- 10:07actually happened. Now, where does order
- 10:09flow actually fit into this?
- 10:11Candlesticks, they're going to show us
- 10:13what happened, but order flow is going
- 10:14to show how it happened and who is
- 10:16actually behind it. And candlestick
- 10:18charts, they show the outcomes of the
- 10:20trades, but they hide the process that
- 10:22created it and that process is
- 10:24incredibly important because you can see
- 10:26a green candle, but was that buying
- 10:28actually aggressive? Was it distributed?
- 10:30Did it move price cleanly? Did it stall?
- 10:33And order flow tools are going to open
- 10:35that up so that we can see what's going
- 10:37on. And we notice how much information
- 10:40is absent from a standard chart compared
- 10:42to what order flow reveals at that same
- 10:44price level. So, if we were to take an
- 10:46example where we compare normal
- 10:48candlestick chart to a footprint or
- 10:50order flow chart,
- 10:52on a normal candlestick chart, we all
- 10:53know what they look like. They have open
- 10:55high low close. It's the result of the
- 10:57period. There's no
- 10:59participation data. There's no
- 11:01absorption signals. It's just showing
- 11:03the scoreboard essentially between
- 11:05buyers and sellers. On a footprint
- 11:08candle or an order flow chart, we see
- 11:11the bid and ask volume at every price
- 11:13level. There's tick by tick transaction
- 11:15data and there's delta, which is
- 11:17aggressive buyer versus seller volume,
- 11:20stacked imbalances, absorption clusters,
- 11:22and we see the game that's actually
- 11:23being played. The core question is is
- 11:27aggression being rewarded with price
- 11:29movement? If yes, follow it. If no, the
- 11:32opposing side is absorbing it and that
- 11:34falls back to that thing that we said
- 11:36earlier about effort versus result. And
- 11:39location matters, okay? Because
- 11:41patterns and and levels, they're not
- 11:43useless. They just don't do what you
- 11:46think they do.
- 11:47Location is incredibly important when it
- 11:49comes to trading because it's going to
- 11:51tell you where something might happen.
- 11:52So, order flow essentially is telling us
- 11:56if it's actually happening. You need
- 11:58both. I don't just like only use order
- 12:00flow. I don't really believe that either
- 12:03alone is sufficient, but we use location
- 12:05context as tools. So, you can still use
- 12:07things like support and resistance or
- 12:09VWAP or higher time frame levels or any
- 12:12of these other things that you may use
- 12:13to build context around a trade. And the
- 12:15sequence below is going to show how
- 12:17location and confirmation work together
- 12:19to produce a valid trade context. The
- 12:22first step in this, when we're
- 12:23approaching the markets, is we need to
- 12:26identify location. Now, this can be
- 12:29whatever you want to use for location.
- 12:31Prior highs,
- 12:32prior lows, resistance zones, supply
- 12:34demand areas, whatever, okay? The next
- 12:37thing that we do is once price actually
- 12:39enters into that location, we start
- 12:41observing order flow. Are buyers lifting
- 12:44into that level? Is absorption forming?
- 12:46What's happening? And then, once the
- 12:48participation is actually confirmed and
- 12:51that initiative activity is showing up
- 12:53and aggression is being rewarded, then
- 12:55we have valid trade context because now
- 12:57we have location plus confirmed
- 12:59participation. That's going to equal or
- 13:01give us a reason to actually engage with
- 13:03the market. And location without
- 13:06participation is not a trade. The level
- 13:10exists. We're watching it, but if no one
- 13:12shows up to act on it, then there's
- 13:14nothing to trade against. Now,
- 13:15understanding this should change the way
- 13:18that you might see the market because
- 13:20when the mental model is right, you stop
- 13:22asking broken questions. The questions a
- 13:25trader asks reveals the model they're
- 13:27running. A pattern based thinking
- 13:29generates questions that can't be
- 13:31answered by like observing the market.
- 13:34But auction based thinking generates
- 13:36questions that are directly observable
- 13:38in real time. If we were to look at this
- 13:40below,
- 13:41what are some pattern based questions?
- 13:43Well, those are things like is this
- 13:45pattern bullish? Should this breakout
- 13:47hold? Why did my setup fail? Which
- 13:49pattern is most reliable? Is this
- 13:51support strong enough? Now, if we think
- 13:53about this in the terms of auction based
- 13:55questions, we're thinking about it more
- 13:57so in the sense of who is being
- 13:59aggressive right now? Is that aggression
- 14:01moving price? Is the effort giving the
- 14:03result that we are looking for
- 14:05essentially? And is liquidity absorbing
- 14:07that pressure? Is initiative or
- 14:09responsive activity winning in this
- 14:11scenario? And these are not necessarily
- 14:14philosophical questions. They are
- 14:17observable in real time with the right
- 14:19tools. And so, that is what makes this
- 14:21framework operational rather than
- 14:23theoretical. The market didn't fill your
- 14:25pattern. Your pattern didn't describe
- 14:28the market. And so, if we come to the
- 14:30realization that patterns are not the
- 14:32answer, then what should the process
- 14:34actually look like? If we look at this
- 14:36side by side comparison of a retail
- 14:38model and an auction based approach,
- 14:41it's the same chart, but it's an
- 14:42entirely different process. Now, a
- 14:45retail model, we might be sitting here
- 14:47looking at the charts and we're waiting
- 14:48for a pattern. We see the pattern. We
- 14:50enter the trade. On an auction based
- 14:51approach, we're reading market context,
- 14:54we're identifying location first and
- 14:56once price reaches that location, we're
- 14:58observing the participation. And then
- 15:00we're only going to execute if all
- 15:03layers align. So, what are we doing?
- 15:04We're identifying market context, right?
- 15:07What kind of auction is happening? Are
- 15:08we in a range? Is price in balance? Is
- 15:11it directional? Is it imbalance or
- 15:13balance? We're identifying important
- 15:15locations, key levels, value areas,
- 15:18previous highs or lows, premium or
- 15:20discount, or whatever else you define as
- 15:23an important location. Once we're
- 15:25observing that participation, we're
- 15:27looking for confirmation. Who is
- 15:28aggressive at this level? Is that
- 15:30aggression actually moving price? And is
- 15:32absorption forming or not? And once we
- 15:35identify all three prior layers, we can
- 15:38execute based on confirmed activity.
- 15:41Now, context alone is not enough and
- 15:43location alone is not enough. We do need
- 15:46confirmation. So, the retail model or
- 15:48pattern preference trading basically
- 15:51skips the first three steps like
- 15:53entirely and that's not a minor
- 15:55inefficiency. It means entering trades
- 15:57without understanding what kind of
- 15:59auction is actually occurring or without
- 16:01knowing where resolution is likely and
- 16:04without any confirmation that
- 16:06participation's actually present. So,
- 16:09the edge in this framework isn't a
- 16:10pattern. It's the sequence. And the
- 16:12biggest change isn't just like opening
- 16:14up an order flow chart or using the
- 16:16right tools. It's just the perspective
- 16:18of it. Everything above comes down to
- 16:20one transition in thinking. You stop
- 16:23looking at charts as collections of
- 16:24patterns and trying to pattern
- 16:26preference trade and you start reading
- 16:28them as records of auction activity. And
- 16:31patterns become descriptions, but
- 16:33participation is what's going to be the
- 16:35actual signal. The question changes from
- 16:37what does this shape predict to who is
- 16:40transacting here and are they winning?
- 16:42And that shift is the shift that we need
- 16:44to have. Patterns to auctions. And once
- 16:47it happens, the way you read every chart
- 16:49or every level and every trade changes
- 16:53permanently. So, the summary of this and
- 16:56what this means for how you trade is
- 16:58essentially this. Patterns describe
- 17:00structure, not cause, and they appear
- 17:03after the participation, not before it.
- 17:06They are effects, not signals.
- 17:09Markets are continuous two-sided
- 17:11auctions. They move based on which side,
- 17:14initiative or responsive, is more
- 17:16aggressive. And aggression must be
- 17:19unabsorbed essentially to move price.
- 17:21And we have to think effort versus
- 17:23result. Is the move being rewarded? Is
- 17:26that effort being rewarded with price
- 17:28movement? If not, somebody is absorbing
- 17:31it. And order flow or order flow charts
- 17:34are going to reveal the process, not
- 17:36just the result. Who is aggressive?
- 17:38Where is liquidity sitting and whether
- 17:40that aggression is actually working? And
- 17:42the layer of the framework goes context,
- 17:44location, participation, and then trade.
- 17:47Every layer of that framework must
- 17:49confirm before you engage. And that is
- 17:52the sequence of the edge. And if you
- 17:54want to understand markets at a deeper
- 17:56level, you have to stop thinking about
- 17:59charts as patterns. You need to start
- 18:01thinking about them as auctions. So, the
- 18:04next time that you see something like
- 18:06this, don't just ask whether this
- 18:08pattern is clean or not. This double top
- 18:10is clean or not. We need to ask a
- 18:12different question. Who is actually
- 18:14participating in the market right now?
- 18:16Because markets don't move because a
- 18:17pattern appeared on a chart. They move
- 18:20when traders are willing to transact at
- 18:22worse prices. And when that
- 18:23participation isn't there, even the
- 18:26cleanest setup in the world can fail.
- 18:29So, what you're really trying to learn
- 18:30as a trader is not necessarily patterns,
- 18:32but it's the auction and how it actually
- 18:34moves. Is price being accepted above
- 18:37these highs? Are we going to continue
- 18:38higher? Or is the move essentially
- 18:41getting absorbed? And that difference
- 18:43separates guessing between actually
- 18:45reading the market. And if you want to
- 18:47go deeper into this idea, I actually put
- 18:49together a couple resources that break
- 18:51this down in a much more structured way.
- 18:54And one of them explains the idea of how
- 18:56markets function as auctions. And the
- 18:59other one walks through the framework
- 19:01that I personally use when I analyze
- 19:03participation using order flow. And
- 19:06they're completely free. You can
- 19:08download them. I'm going to include them
- 19:09in the description below so you can read
- 19:11them. But we're going to we're going to
- 19:13end it with this, okay? The market is
- 19:15not random, but it also isn't patterns.
- 19:18It's participation. So, I will catch you
- 19:20guys in the next video. Peace.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Why Pattern Trading Fails Most Traders by Christopher Creamer | Orderflow Trader, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,417 words across 532 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.