YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → Why Men and Women Pick Friends Differently | Jungian Sexuality | CS Joseph

Why Men and Women Pick Friends Differently | Jungian Sexuality | CS Joseph — Transcript

by C.S. Joseph · 5,664 words · 886 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00I gave you all alone
0:04[Music]
0:13what's up Eagle hackers welcome to the
0:17C.S Joseph podcast
0:21today's episode
0:23we're gonna be discussing uh
0:28how
0:29masculine on masculine versus feminine
0:33on feminine relationships basically
0:35friendships
0:36how they seem to work from a Pareto
0:38Principle uh perspective
0:42because we noticed that there is a bit
0:45of a pattern psychologically when it
0:47comes to how men and women organize
0:50their relationships from a compatibility
0:52versus a camaraderie points of view
0:55among the 16 types which is completely
0:58fascinating
1:00also
1:01potentially supports a very
1:04controversial Viewpoint that I have in
1:07regards to relationships and uh nice dog
1:14so
1:16from that perspective
1:19it just lands into what we've been
1:20saying in like a previous video talking
1:22about how
1:23you know
1:24our genes our Evolution as human beings
1:27ends up having like some protections uh
1:29put into place based on some of our
1:32Natures which then lends itself to
1:35specific uh behaviors and I ultimately
1:38find this utterly fascinating
1:41quite fascinating
1:45so we're going to be doing a little Deep
1:47dive on that
1:48but uh oh there goes the ash I had a I
1:51had a pretty good one there but uh
1:52finally uh killed over
1:55so
1:56anyway the point is uh
1:59camaraderie and compatibility end up
2:02becoming uh something that
2:05is a shadow of a phenomenon that's
2:08happening between people and their
2:11friendships
2:13when men are friends with other men for
2:16example
2:17they behave in a very affiliative Manner
2:19and this is this is regardless of their
2:21alpha or beta or whatever interpretation
2:24of the red pill you may have Sigma male
2:27who cares it doesn't matter men or men
2:30are men and the way of man is ultimately
2:31the same when you put a bunch of men
2:33together in the same place and guess
2:36what well women have a similar approach
2:38as well when it comes to having other
2:40women in their lives women that they
2:41have close relationships with
2:44and the reality of the situation is is
2:47that
2:48men being basically affiliative with
2:51their relationships how that actually
2:53manifests like some examples it's like
2:55you know hey man don't break the bro
2:57code you know the bro code the Bromance
2:59the bro ham you know growing out you
3:01know that whole the whole dichotomy that
3:04whole way of uh behavior that men have
3:06when they come together as a collective
3:09towards a common goal the red pill
3:11writers call this you know women talk
3:13but men do right they do things together
3:16they take action together
3:22and that's that's important that's very
3:23uh
3:24necessary to understand because at the
3:27end of the day they're all about doing
3:29the right thing to each other or for
3:31each other
3:33so one of the reasons why uh you know
3:35the the Ten Commandment uh out of the
3:38Ten Commandments is Thou shalt not covet
3:40thy neighbor's wife
3:41it's because the number one unspoken
3:44rule of the bro ham the bro code or the
3:46bromances never screw another man's
3:49woman without his permission basically
3:51you know and that's in a very
3:53affiliative concept men who do not
3:56follow that rule I mean
3:58in ancient times they were exiled
4:00they're executed they were murdered you
4:02know like like when men cheat not very
4:04much happens but when women cheat uh
4:07Cities Burn basically because you know
4:11uh there's an aspect of Vengeance when
4:14it comes uh you know from from a male
4:16point of view due to their masculine
4:17idealism
4:22and they often take their uh
4:25masculine idealism with them when it
4:27comes to relationships with other men as
4:30much as they take their masculine
4:31idealism with them anywhere they go
4:32because men together are very
4:34affiliative
4:36and they're always it's ultimately how
4:39teamwork regardless if they're pragmatic
4:41or affiliative you know individually but
4:43collectively they're ultimately
4:45affiliative this is why you can have a
4:47group of 300 dudes stand against a 20
4:49000 man army and basically win or hold
4:53them back for long enough for all of the
4:56other Allied city-states of Greece to
4:58come together and fight at the uh you
5:01know fighting
5:02fight the enemy and unite and push back
5:04the Persians and repel the Invaders from
5:06the lands
5:08all because 300 Spartans were
5:10affiliative one day willing to sacrifice
5:12their lives and quote do the right thing
5:15for not only their own Nation but the
5:17other uh nation states uh within uh
5:21within Greece essentially
5:23and they were ultimately successful
5:26which is a really big deal but it was it
5:28was made possible because of how
5:31affiliative men are women are a lot
5:34different women however come from the
5:36perspective that uh
5:39you know they're very they're very
5:40pragmatic this is one of the reasons why
5:42like you know when men look at life they
5:44see life as this big pie and they're
5:46just trying to get their own slice
5:47they'll even help their brothers get
5:49their slice out of life that's a very
5:51affiliative point of view but when women
5:52look at life and they see it as this big
5:54pie and they each get their slice they
5:56look at each other it's like well why do
5:58you get that slice why is your slice
5:59better be your slice has a pot has more
6:01fruit in it or it it has a a frosted
6:04flour on it why didn't I get a frosted
6:06flour you know that kind of what makes
6:07you so special
6:08women are inherently pragmatic they're
6:12very pragmatic towards one another and
6:15their relationships with each other are
6:16based ultimately on pragmatism they have
6:19this unique Independence about them
6:21that's why women suffer from things like
6:23competition anxiety they're very afraid
6:25that other women would basically take
6:27what they have and they should be afraid
6:29because due to the pragmatism that women
6:31have collectively women oftentimes are
6:34unscrupulous about uh poaching
6:38the men from their fellow female friends
6:41it happens all the time it's actually a
6:43very common phenomenon and that's an
6:46example of how pragmatism ends up
6:49working or working for women when they
6:51come together collectively this is one
6:53of the reasons why women choose or an
6:55elect to talk instead of do because when
6:58women are doing and doing things
7:00together they can't really decide on who
7:03should be the leader because in the
7:06affiliative area of male space male
7:09space can easily understand what the
7:11hierarchy is who is the alpha who's not
7:14who's the strongest who should be in
7:15charge and it's just very instantly
7:18known who's running the show as a result
7:21but from a female perspective in female
7:23space they don't know this is why when
7:26women come together they often elect to
7:28talk that's why they have something
7:29called Stitch and basically
7:31instead of doing because in order to do
7:34something there would have to be some
7:36kind of hierarchy
7:38uh they they would have to decide you
7:41know who's going to have the torch and
7:42women have a hard time when they're
7:43together to you know deciding who the
7:46leader is and oftentimes they pass the
7:49torch of leadership amongst one another
7:51whereas men
7:52the established leader is established
7:54and that's it that's it and it's because
7:57women are pragmatic they're very
7:59independent when they are together
8:01whereas men are very interdependent when
8:04they are together and it's always
8:06fascinating uh you know to see this work
8:08out this is one of the reasons why like
8:10one of the biggest regrets of my life
8:12even though it's technically not mine to
8:14regret per se but it is ultimately an
8:17area of my life that I feel has been
8:20lacking I never had the opportunity to
8:24have a brother
8:25and I wish I really really wish I did
8:28have that opportunity
8:30it'd be really nice to have that
8:32opportunity you know to like go back in
8:34time to my childhood and you know grow
8:37up with what it would have been like to
8:38have a brother or brothers to have some
8:41of that you know affiliative mail space
8:44among my brothers and even take that you
8:46know into my adulthood you could say
8:49that I'm definitely envious of Andrew
8:51Tate's relationship that he has with his
8:53brother Tristan that's something I've
8:55always wanted my whole life and I've
8:58never really actually been able to have
8:59that level of uh connection or male
9:03space affiliative within you know blood
9:06relatives it just hasn't happened with
9:08maybe the exception of my male cousins
9:10uh Mike and Nick
9:12probably
9:14you know if there is anyone in the world
9:16that I really consider my brother who is
9:18a blood relative that would definitely
9:20be uh my cousin Mike
9:23he's always treated me like a brother
9:25and he's always been there for me and
9:27that's why I go out of my way to be
9:28there for him today if he calls me I
9:30answer the phone that's just how it is
9:32you know because he was there for me in
9:34my time of need he also helped Mentor me
9:36in a lot of areas and he made me better
9:38as a result a lot of the reasons why I'm
9:40even able to actually be here today
9:42talking to you folks and doing uh this
9:45Channel and whatnot is literally because
9:47of my cousin Mike for example so at
9:51least he was able to take on that figure
9:53of being a brother to me
9:55and you know what maybe I wouldn't have
9:57ended up as a uduf octogram you know
9:59from that perspective uh had I actually
10:02had a brother you know like that's
10:05certainly a possibility you know but uh
10:09but yeah like that that's just something
10:10I wish I had you know and Men deep down
10:13crave this affiliative uh perspective
10:16when it comes to you know male space the
10:19problem is is that Society has gone out
10:21of its way to make sure that male space
10:23is not allowed to exist
10:25and
10:27the reason why is because where male
10:29space exists masculinity will grow and
10:31where masculinity grows then masculinity
10:33will ultimately challenge the system and
10:35it could eventually lead to Revolution
10:37men will start to realize one of two
10:39things that they have nothing to lose
10:40and then they're willing to fight and
10:42put their lives down to change the
10:43system or they'll realize they have
10:45everything to lose and they'll be
10:47willing to lay down their lives and
10:49Revolt and change the system basically
10:51but the elite or in those who control
10:54the world would never allow that to
10:56happen like Ever So based on that they
10:59have to uh
11:03you know they have to result to other
11:04means like for example in Washington
11:06state it's illegal to smoke tobacco
11:09inside right that is a direct assault on
11:12male space and that is one way with
11:14which masculinity can be reduced
11:17just on that alone I'm very thankful
11:18that the state that I live in smoking
11:20tobacco inside is actually legal so you
11:23know so it just ends up you know being
11:25up to the bar owners where the owners
11:27the bar is like yeah you can smoke or no
11:29no smoking Etc it leaves that up to the
11:31decision of the owners of the bars to
11:33make that decision it's nice you know I
11:35right after I filmed this actually I'm
11:37gonna be going to my favorite Speak Easy
11:39where I sometimes film as well and going
11:42to be enjoying myself at that bar and I
11:44will be smoking cigars with my friends
11:46you know with our mail space at that bar
11:49it's gonna be it's gonna be great so
11:52uh but that's again that's just that's
11:54just one example ultimately but men
11:56ultimately crave that that male space
11:58because that affiliate of nature because
12:00it all it all goes down to like you know
12:02the family you choose versus the family
12:05you inherit and a lot of men out there
12:08you know they end up creating a
12:10Brotherhood and that Brotherhood becomes
12:12a family ultimately a masculine family
12:15and it's that masculine family that can
12:16challenge the system it can win Wars it
12:19can survive in the trenches when one of
12:22them is down you know the other guy can
12:24pick them up you know in a triple
12:26braided court is not easily broken
12:27according to King Solomon as he was
12:29describing you know ultimately the
12:32benefits of male space uh in that
12:34passage I think it's Ecclesiastes
12:36chapter seven or Ecclesiastes chapter
12:38nine if I remember correctly
12:40I could be wrong I could be misquoting
12:43the uh citation there
12:45um but it is in some of his writings in
12:48the Old Testament
12:50so
12:51from that point of view
12:53we have to understand you know these
12:56these male differences these female
12:58differences when it comes to how they
13:00manage their friends
13:01so pragmatism rules uh female space and
13:05the affiliative rules mail space
13:08ultimately so understanding these two
13:10concepts is very necessary because then
13:12you're able to actually look at another
13:15phenomenon that's happening because male
13:18space is affiliative because female
13:19space is pragmatic and that is
13:22ultimately how men and women are
13:24different when it comes to choosing
13:26friends
13:27now I was I was reading a book by
13:29Matthew Hussey recently and a lot of
13:32people in the manosphere in the red pill
13:34uh groups absolutely hate Matthew Hussey
13:37Matthew Hussey is an infj he wrote the
13:39book get the guy I just finished reading
13:41it uh hadees in the Discord Community
13:44highly recommended it to me so I decided
13:47I'd read it and so I did and uh I found
13:49it I found it ultimately fascinating but
13:51one of the things that he said in his
13:54book was that if you give like 10 women
13:56to a man uh he'll play but if you give
13:5910 men to women she will choose you know
14:02and this is extremely extremely
14:06important because what I realized as a
14:08result of reading this book is that that
14:11directly applies also to male on male
14:14friendships and female on female
14:16friendships right because if you notice
14:19something a huge difference between men
14:21and women and it's this when men choose
14:24their friends they value compatibility
14:26ability with their friends
14:29more so than they value camaraderie but
14:32with women being that they're pragmatic
14:35you know they actually end up valuing
14:39camaraderie higher than they value
14:42compatibility the reason why and I
14:45suspect this is the reason why and I
14:48believe this is true but probably gonna
14:52need a little bit more time in the field
14:53to verify but I played in plenty of time
14:55in the field already to verify but I
14:58mean the jury could still be out so I'm
15:00just admitting it right now but I don't
15:01think so I really don't think so I think
15:03I think this is the truth
15:06um
15:06that women you know like from a Pareto
15:10Principle perspective 80 of their
15:12friends are typically girlfriends who
15:14are high camaraderie with them with 20
15:16of them being compatible whereas it's
15:18the other way around with men eighty
15:21percent of their friends are compatible
15:22with them and only 20 of them have
15:24camaraderie which is very very
15:27fascinating if you think about it you
15:30know like you know one could argue like
15:32you know from a new testament
15:33perspective where you know the Apostle
15:36Peter basically claims that you know
15:37women are the quote weaker sex Etc
15:41well it would make sense under that
15:43context because they have all these
15:45camaraderie based uh relationships with
15:49fellow women and camaraderie exists
15:51ultimately to serve as sources of
15:54personal growth so it gives women the
15:56opportunity to personally grow and as
15:59and help facilitate their pragmatism
16:02when they are with each other between
16:03their girlfriends they're very very
16:05pragmatic oftentimes to the point of
16:07being so pragmatic they're actually
16:08willing to poach each other's men off
16:10each other sometimes even in secret or
16:13in covertly and even sometimes on a rare
16:16basis overtly you know from time to time
16:19and that can be that could be a major
16:22issue but ultimately the camaraderie is
16:25there to help improve you know to help
16:28improve women you know whereas the
16:30affiliative is bringing about compatible
16:33relationships with men
16:34why is this happening it's because men
16:37do not have their emotional needs met
16:39and having compatibility amongst their
16:41male friends allows men to actually have
16:43an opportunity to experience
16:45unconditional love within the
16:48Brotherhood within this life because men
16:51don't experience unconditional love from
16:53women they just don't they really don't
16:56it's not about unconditional love with
16:59women they don't they don't experience
17:00it the one woman in their whole life
17:03that they could and they have the
17:04highest opportunity of experiencing
17:06unconditional love is between their
17:09their mother and themselves but the
17:11thing is is that that's not entirely
17:12true either because even to this day you
17:15know most women out there have abortions
17:17so that's not exactly an example of
17:22unconditional love towards their
17:23children basically so you know and also
17:27you know collectively as women enable
17:30each other they enable each other to be
17:31more pragmatic and enable them to be
17:33empowered women and you know fem
17:36empowerment and the women's movement and
17:39those types of things right feminism
17:40ultimately also known you know from a
17:42Biblical perspective as the spirit of
17:45Jezebel the spirit of Jezebel that the
17:47Prophet Elijah basically annihilated
17:49um so it was kind of interesting because
17:51Elijah's ultimate purpose according to
17:54the prophet Malachi is to turn the
17:57hearts of Sons of their fathers the
17:58hearts and fathers to their sons so the
18:01Prophet Elijah is the most anti-feminist
18:03prophet of the Old Testament basically
18:05uh you know from that perspective and
18:08you can actually even see an example of
18:10that playing out within the first and
18:11second chapter of the Book of Esther
18:14where the advisors to King Xerxes who
18:17actually lost uh to King Leonidas and uh
18:21well he killed Leonidas technically but
18:23uh lost to the to the to the Greeks and
18:26then ended up uh you know running away
18:28like a little uh back to uh his
18:32Citadel and Sousa in Persia basically
18:34when he failed his invasion and then
18:36just basically was with his Harem for
18:38the rest of his life feeling empty and
18:40whatnot but uh
18:43from that perspective
18:45um you know you can see how these men
18:48are you know complaining about feminism
18:50and complaining about the dangers of the
18:52spirit of Jezebel ultimately which is
18:54what Elijah was sent to ultimately
18:55destroy
18:57um which is fascinating and also Elijah
18:59is only one of two people in the Bible
19:01that was actually spared from death
19:05which is also fascinating if you think
19:07about it completely preserved right you
19:11know I mean even Jesus died but Elijah
19:13didn't you know Enoch didn't you know so
19:16so like from from that perspective like
19:19a lot of people just don't even
19:20understand you know what ultimately that
19:22purpose was and Elijah's purpose was to
19:24destroy feminism that's really what it
19:26was you know call me crazy for saying
19:28that but that's just reality you know
19:30proven in first and second Kings it's
19:33also proven in Malachi as to ultimately
19:35what his purpose was because of how he
19:37was involved in the Jezebel incident and
19:40also turning the hearts of sunset
19:41fathers and hearts of fathers of the
19:43sons I'm being repetitive so forgive me
19:45so
19:46from that perspective we can move on and
19:48move forward from that
19:52the affiliative nature of men basically
19:55allows them to have causes them to
19:57desire compatible men in their life
19:59because through the Brotherhood of the
20:01affiliative nature of the mature
20:03masculine and ultimately male space
20:05gives man the opportunity to experience
20:09unconditional love through their
20:11relationships with each other
20:13unconditional love is not really
20:15available to them with women and at most
20:18it could be there between their mothers
20:20but even then that's a crap shoot
20:22technically speaking uh you know it's
20:25not it's not a guaranteed outcome but it
20:26can be a guaranteed outcome uh a more
20:29than likely outcome uh when it comes to
20:32you know participating in the
20:33Brotherhood women have a different
20:35perspective women it's just not that way
20:37you know they're not really exactly
20:38loyal to each other they're all very
20:40pragmatic to each other they're all very
20:42independent uh and
20:44this is all and if you notice like they
20:47don't really allow very many pragmatic
20:50relationships uh or very many compatible
20:54relationships with people in their lives
20:56and what what ends up happening is that
20:58you notice that women end up saving
21:01their most compatible relationship
21:04ultimately as you know between them and
21:08their man you know them and their lover
21:10them and their husband them and the
21:12father of their children basically
21:13because just as Matthew Hussey said his
21:15book get the guy he said uh quote you
21:18know give 10 women to a man and he'll
21:21play but give 10 men to women and she
21:24will choose right because women
21:26ultimately due to the fact that their
21:29beauty and their fertility ends up
21:31expiring over time and decaying over
21:34time and they have to work really hard
21:36to preserve their beauty as long as they
21:38can throughout their life they really
21:40only have time to really invest into
21:43really just one man at a time because if
21:46they try to have multiple men then you
21:48know technically their value goes down
21:49and that can be a problem you know
21:51ultimately because high value men are
21:54not going to commit to a woman with such
21:55a high body count as we've discussed
21:57before on this channel so
22:00that is that ends up being interesting
22:02they they they do seek compatible
22:04relationships but it's really only in in
22:07a deep sexual relationship that women
22:10are seeking this now that's not to say
22:11that they don't have compatible female
22:13friends
22:14but when you actually look at their
22:16friends in large and they're not
22:18mistyping themselves they're not
22:19mistyping their friends all of a sudden
22:22they'll realize wow I actually do prefer
22:25camaraderie amongst my girlfriends and
22:28save compatibility for that one deep uh
22:31committed relationship that I have with
22:33a man ultimately right whereas it's kind
22:37of uh interesting when it comes to men
22:39men seek out camaraderie or
22:42compatibility from each other with not
22:44as much camaraderie and then also uh
22:48seek out
22:51they also they they end up seeking out
22:53you know also compatibility with a woman
22:56you know men men can't get enough
22:58compatibility basically now I've I've
23:01heard some women you know within the
23:04community talk about how well that's
23:05just men enabling men Etc and you know
23:09while that can necessarily be the case
23:10you have to understand is that without
23:12men enabling men without the mature
23:14masking without male space society would
23:17have never even existed without
23:19mailspace mailspace is is everything
23:23male space is entirely important and the
23:25society is against male space because
23:27everyone just assumes male space exists
23:30to destroy female space but if you
23:32actually end up watching or
23:34participating in female space you'll see
23:36that it's pure chaos because
23:38every one of these women are trying to
23:40like be the queen of her own little Hill
23:44and it's like having too many chefs in a
23:46kitchen basically whereas with men
23:49that's not necessarily the case there's
23:50eventually always going to be an
23:51established hierarchy and established a
23:54pecking order when it comes to uh when
23:57it comes to things you know because even
23:59women understand that just because
24:01you're the queen bee today doesn't mean
24:02you're going to be the queen bee
24:03tomorrow right but with man it's
24:05different it's a that established
24:07pecking order can last a very long time
24:10and they're completely okay with it
24:11because at least they're getting their
24:13own potential unconditional love needs
24:17or emotional needs being met by their
24:18fellow men because those emotional needs
24:21are not necessarily being met by the
24:22women in their life no matter how
24:24compatible they are right uh with those
24:27women it just so it's just it's just a
24:30fascinating phenomenon if you think
24:31about it it's a really really
24:32fascinating phenomenon women prefer to
24:35have more camaraderie amongst fellow uh
24:40female friends and men prefer to have
24:43more compatible relationships and
24:45friendships with men and it's it's it's
24:48unbelievable if you just see how life is
24:51structured this way
24:52now here's the kicker here's where it
24:55gets super controversial
24:57why why does this happen what is what is
25:01happening from an evolutionary point of
25:03view what is happening uh you know to
25:07help facilitate the the pro generation
25:10as well as the procreation of humanity
25:14as a species why is this phenomenon
25:17happening and I would state that the
25:19actual reason is is ultimately for
25:21reproduction and for protecting the
25:24future and the longevity of the race
25:25itself
25:27because if you think about it with men
25:30being preferring compatible
25:31relationships they enable each other
25:33which means because of that enablement
25:36that they put among each other as
25:37they're seeking that higher level of
25:41um
25:42um uh potentially unconditional love and
25:45deep-rooted uh Brotherhood relationships
25:48the family you choose not the family you
25:49inherit when it comes to fellow men the
25:51risk is is that because they're enabling
25:54each other
25:55those men may not actually challenge
25:57each other to grow which means high
26:00value men are an even more scarce
26:03resource by default because of the
26:07enabling nature of male space
26:11male space does not produce as many high
26:14value
26:15men as potentially
26:18female space could potentially create
26:21high value women that's what the mature
26:22feminine was for even though the mature
26:24feminine doesn't exist anymore because
26:26the mature masculine barely exists
26:28nowadays uh and that's and that's a fact
26:31that's a fact
26:32so what does a man to do
26:35So based on that we know that production
26:39of high value men is much lower and I
26:42guess that would make sense because you
26:43know there's only you know according to
26:45Rolo tomasi in his book rational mail
26:47Volume 5 the player's handbook within
26:49that book he States as as very uh crazy
26:52statistic that women will only initiate
26:56with only four and a half percent of men
26:58out there they might be a you know that
27:01whereas with 20 of men they're just like
27:04not just by default unattracted to those
27:06men but then only there's four and a
27:09half percent of the men out there that a
27:11woman would actually be willing to
27:13initiate with them herself right they
27:15find them that attractive that they'd be
27:17willing to initiate with on their own
27:19right that's that's that's a very small
27:21number for high value man out there four
27:24and a half percent that's extremely
27:25small
27:26so less than one out of every 20 men out
27:29there is potentially a high value men
27:32that's that's
27:34that's really low that's extremely low
27:36but I think one of the reasons for that
27:37is because mail space uh because men
27:40have this affiliative point of view
27:42they're not really mail space does not
27:45necessarily actually produce uh high
27:49value men so it's really a high value
27:52meant like because you know as iron and
27:53sharp is iron so is one man to another
27:55so when you bring a lot of men together
27:57into like one place as it were you know
28:02they'll ultimately become you know the
28:04average of the men that they are around
28:06so that's why a hot bunch of high value
28:08men need to like screen other men
28:10joining their group so that those men
28:13can actually you know grow with each
28:15other and not allow any lower value men
28:18in their group to kind of like cramp
28:20their style that's where the whole
28:21saying hey he's cramping my style
28:23actually comes from that's where it
28:25comes from
28:26so
28:28so that ends up becoming an issue but
28:30why why is this matter why is this
28:33happening what is the con the very
28:35controversial point of view
28:38that I've been able to extract as a
28:41result of knowing these Dynamics when it
28:44comes to how women choose and structure
28:47their female friends versus how men's
28:49shoes and structure their male friends
28:51men preferring compatibility among their
28:53male friends and women uh preferring
28:56camaraderie among their female friends
28:58why does that matter well again
29:00reproduction
29:02because
29:04100 men and one woman could not
29:07repopulate the Earth it can't happen but
29:11a hundred women and one man can
29:13repopulate the Earth okay this is why so
29:18the concept of Sister Wives in a
29:20polygenous situation in an in poligenous
29:22relationships or there's one man with
29:24multiple who has multiple sexual
29:26relationships with multiple women and
29:29those women only have sexual
29:31relationships with just that one man the
29:34fact that that man is able to have
29:37sexual compatibility with a bunch of
29:40women at the same time and even if those
29:42women are aware of each other or know
29:43each other those women who are
29:45potentially Sister Wives would
29:47necessarily be evolutionary Lee okay
29:49with it because they already organized
29:52their female friends from a camaraderie
29:54point of view because if you think about
29:57it if a man is sexually compatible with
29:59for example eight women
30:01affectionate an affection woman a
30:03companion woman a natural woman an
30:06Intrigue woman a respect woman a
30:08trustwoman a refinement woman a kindred
30:11woman if he has relationships with all
30:14eight sexual compatibilities with eight
30:15different women for example they're
30:17going to have high camaraderie with
30:20those functions but women already
30:23organized their life when it comes to
30:25having girlfriends in general with
30:27having camaraderie which means women are
30:30already pre-programmed to facilitate
30:33poligenous relationships
30:35based on how our evolutionary psychology
30:39actually works from a collective point
30:41of view there are already pre-programmed
30:44psychologically to allow for this with a
30:48high value man basically
30:51and as that high value man increases his
30:53affiliatives with other high-value men
30:55and he ends up growing and growing them
30:57and they grow grow with each other
30:59within their Bromance their Broham their
31:00Brotherhood he gets to enjoy a bunch of
31:04women who are potentially Sister Wives
31:05but they don't mind so much and there's
31:07not very much conflict because women
31:09already are used to
31:12choosing their girlfriends and
31:14potentially their Sister Wives based on
31:16camaraderie to begin with and it's
31:18already there it's already there it's
31:21already built in
31:22fascinating perspective if you think
31:24about it
31:25it just goes to show that Evolution
31:27backs up my point of view when it comes
31:30to
31:31poligenous relationships you know it
31:34doesn't it doesn't serve the feminist
31:36perspective of monogamy and don't get me
31:38wrong folks
31:40monogamy is feminist it is monogamy is
31:44feminist and the reason why that is the
31:47case is because ultimately the elite
31:48does not want us making babies because
31:50the elite is oh crap if man all of a
31:52sudden realized that they could be
31:53having poligenous relationships then the
31:56population would be out of control and
31:58then that would be really bad because if
32:00there's one thing the elite does not
32:02want they do not want people creating
32:04Bloodlines and having Bloodlines if
32:06they're willing to fight and die for in
32:08wars that could potentially take power
32:09away from the elite themselves that's
32:11literally why everything in our society
32:15in Western Society is as toxic as it is
32:17it's why we have fluoride in our water
32:18it's why
32:20um it's why uh you know pharmaceutical
32:23companies are not here to cure you
32:24they're here to give you a Band-Aid and
32:26send you on your way they're here to
32:27ease your pain hence why they push
32:29painkillers so much instead of actual
32:31cures that's literally how it works
32:33that's why you can't trust the white
32:34coats you really can't you have to do
32:36your own research you're better off
32:37looking at PubMed and trying to come up
32:39to their own conclusion or hiring people
32:40like John brison for example or Dr
32:42Barbara Mack out of Seattle uh or maybe
32:46Dr Tammy moralia instead of like you
32:48know you just you just really can't
32:50trust the general uh white coats out
32:53there you just can't you know because
32:55they don't even realize it but
32:57everyone's kind of been brainwashed by
33:00the elite brainwashed by The Matrix and
33:03to defend the Matrix because their ego
33:04Investments are all based on the Matrix
33:07you know and if you guys want to read in
33:09fantastic book about it although it's
33:10very Christian uh Frank Viola's book uh
33:14Insurgent or insurgents
33:17um is uh is a fantastic read because it
33:20talks about how people's ego Investments
33:22often align with Society because Society
33:25has conditioned to them to be this way
33:27it is the Matrix okay so yeah you know
33:30if the elite had its way they would
33:32never ever ever allow masculinity to
33:35take full form because if masculinity
33:37took full form Not only would there be a
33:40lot more babies because with the mature
33:41masculine returning all of a sudden one
33:44man to multiple women relationships will
33:45be happening entire Bloodlines would be
33:48exploding out of nowhere and those
33:49Bloodlines would eventually become
33:51strong enough to challenge their power
33:52oh sucks really sucks so they go out of
33:56our way to institutionalize monogamy and
33:59condition everyone in terms of monogamy
34:01in order to keep the population low so
34:03that there is no bloodline that would be
34:05big enough out there to actually
34:06challenge theirs and challenge their
34:08power so welcome to how the world really
34:12actually works so yeah
34:14anyway folks thanks for watching and
34:16listening hopefully you enjoyed this
34:18interesting perspective I'll see you
34:21guys tonight on the Discord
34:23[Music]
34:30[Applause]
34:30[Music]

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Why Men and Women Pick Friends Differently | Jungian Sexuality | CS Joseph by C.S. Joseph, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 5,664 words across 886 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.