YouTube2Text

Why Former Federal Prosecutor Says He Believes Scott Peterson Deserves A New Trial — Transcript

by Dr. Phil · 613 words · 88 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00Mark gsy is the director of the Ohio
  2. 0:02Innocence Project at the University of
  3. 0:04Cincinnati and author of blind Injustice
  4. 0:08a former prosecutor exposes the
  5. 0:10psychology and politics of wrongful
  6. 0:13convictions now Mark believes that Scott
  7. 0:17had an unfair trial now mark thank you
  8. 0:19for being here I really appreciate it
  9. 0:21now you're not saying that you believe
  10. 0:24Scott Peterson is innocent you're saying
  11. 0:27you believe that he deserves a fair
  12. 0:28trial correct yeah and I think that if
  13. 0:31you look at the current New Evidence
  14. 0:34that's been brought to light and the
  15. 0:35advances in science and looking at the
  16. 0:37science the forensics that were
  17. 0:38presented back at his original trial and
  18. 0:40what we know about it now it's a totally
  19. 0:42different ball game and you know some of
  20. 0:44the things that Nancy Grace was saying
  21. 0:46just now on this show is wrong and Nancy
  22. 0:49I I'd ask you and would you say under
  23. 0:51oath that you've actually read the
  24. 0:53habius petition in the in the California
  25. 0:54Supreme Court and you've studied the
  26. 0:57advances in science and all the all the
  27. 0:59things that are reflecting back on the
  28. 1:00original trial and showing the things
  29. 1:01that were unreliable and were wrong in
  30. 1:03the original trial cuz I think you
  31. 1:04haven't Nancy did you hear the question
  32. 1:08I heard the statement I didn't realize
  33. 1:09it was the question I thought he was
  34. 1:10continuing to
  35. 1:12pontificate um actually
  36. 1:14sir I am a crime victim myself and I
  37. 1:18have devoted my life to not only
  38. 1:20Prosecuting and representing Crime
  39. 1:22Victims but to always seeking the truth
  40. 1:25and as a matter of fact yes I have read
  41. 1:28the legal documents in this case and
  42. 1:30I've spoken in depth with Janie who I
  43. 1:34respect a lot and she has many points
  44. 1:37that I think are valid to be argued but
  45. 1:40do I believe he deserves a new trial no
  46. 1:44I do not okay well then let me ask you
  47. 1:45this if you've read the most recent
  48. 1:47documents the state's expert at trial
  49. 1:49did the fetal analysis and said that the
  50. 1:52baby Connor died on December 24th which
  51. 1:54fits the state's Theory and used a
  52. 1:57formula and the theory of this Dr jente
  53. 1:59this famous forensic pathologist in this
  54. 2:01field well now Dr jente has chimed in
  55. 2:04and said this person actually made huge
  56. 2:06mistakes number one use the wrong
  57. 2:08formula there's different formulas you
  58. 2:10use depending on what information you
  59. 2:11have like the last period of the mother
  60. 2:13or different sonograms and use the wrong
  61. 2:15bones and when you actually and this is
  62. 2:17he's the expert he's the one that
  63. 2:19developed these theories and he said
  64. 2:20this expert that the state called at
  65. 2:22trial misapplied my theories if you
  66. 2:24apply the correct Theory Connor lived
  67. 2:26until January 4th until January 3rd or
  68. 2:294th
  69. 2:30and let me go back to another point you
  70. 2:31brought up with Lacy the reason why the
  71. 2:33burglars don't want to talk when Lacy
  72. 2:36confronted them is because they said he
  73. 2:38said I'll take the fifth because they
  74. 2:40don't want to be implicated in this if
  75. 2:41somebody abducted Lacy because Lacy
  76. 2:43confronted them and the ba and Lacy and
  77. 2:45the baby lived a little bit longer by
  78. 2:47that time they knew exactly where to
  79. 2:49jump the body the dogs sent stuff the
  80. 2:51dogs they used had failed 2third of
  81. 2:53their qualification test more often than
  82. 2:55they passed one of the dogs was wrong
  83. 2:5775% of the time that's right this is
  84. 2:59unreliable this is junk science along
  85. 3:02with the title stuff and the baby
  86. 3:04science that was used we now look at
  87. 3:06this through the lens of 2018 advances
  88. 3:08and we see a completely different story

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Why Former Federal Prosecutor Says He Believes Scott Peterson Deserves A New Trial by Dr. Phil, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 613 words across 88 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.