What Does Evolution Mean? Stephen Meyer Explains Three Different Claims — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00All right. Tell me what evolution means
- 0:03because I people mean different things
- 0:05by it it seems to me. So may maybe we
- 0:07could just begin with a general
- 0:10definition. Maybe the definition would
- 0:11be good.
- 0:11>> that is the right question to ask
- 0:13because that's where the confusion
- 0:14always starts is by not defining terms.
- 0:17Okay. Um it's good classical philosophy,
- 0:20you know, define your terms. Um
- 0:23there are multiple meanings of the term
- 0:25and that's where a lot of confusion
- 0:26comes in. The most basic meaning of the
- 0:28term evolution is simply the idea of
- 0:29change over time.
- 0:30>> Okay.
- 0:31>> Do biological organisms change over
- 0:32time? Yeah, sure they do. So that's not
- 0:35controversial. No one is is disputing
- 0:37that. There are different senses of
- 0:39change over time within a biological
- 0:41context. Uh you might be talking if you
- 0:44when you're using this term in this this
- 0:45kind of
- 0:46rudimentary way, you might be referring
- 0:48to the simple fact that the life forms
- 0:52that exist on planet Earth today are
- 0:54different than the ones that it existed
- 0:56as best we can tell from the fossil
- 0:57record on planet Earth a long time ago.
- 1:00We do not have trilobites or
- 1:01triceratopses today,
- 1:03um but we we had triceratopses in
- 1:07uh the
- 1:09Jurassic, check me.
- 1:11Cretaceous, one of those. And we had the
- 1:13trilobites certainly in the in the
- 1:15in the Cambrian period, okay? So so we
- 1:17have life is different now than it is
- 1:19today. It's changed over time. We've had
- 1:21evolution. Okay. Fair enough. Not
- 1:24controversial.
- 1:25Um uh the other sense of evolution in
- 1:29this um non-controversial sense is the
- 1:32idea that there are small-scale
- 1:34variations or adaptations of organisms
- 1:37to their environment within various
- 1:38usually within limits. You can think of
- 1:41>> Yeah, give us some examples though.
- 1:42>> Well, the famous examples are the ones
- 1:44that are in the textbooks. The the
- 1:45peppered moths,
- 1:47the coloration of which shifted in
- 1:49response to varying levels of
- 1:51uh of atmospheric pollution in in in
- 1:56industrial England. And dark to light
- 1:58and like light and dark again. Um or the
- 2:02the the the shape of the finch beaks
- 2:05Darwin's famous
- 2:06finches that whose beaks have changed
- 2:10size and shape in response to varying
- 2:13weather patterns and the availability
- 2:15apparently the availability of of of
- 2:17food supply. So different beak shapes
- 2:19seem to favor survival of of certain um
- 2:23of of when
- 2:26harder or softer nuts were available. So
- 2:28>> And then those that survived reproduce
- 2:30and adapt.
- 2:31>> and and right.
- 2:32>> Okay.
- 2:32>> And so you have a
- 2:33>> Is this called microevolution?
- 2:35>> It's called microevolution, it's called
- 2:36adaptation, it's just called small-scale
- 2:38variation within the limits of a
- 2:40pre-existing gene pool.
- 2:42It's well established. Nobody doubts it.
- 2:45And so that's evolution number one.
- 2:47>> Okay.
- 2:47>> Evolution number two second meaning is
- 2:50the idea that not only has there been
- 2:52change over time but that change has
- 2:54been continuous and effectively
- 2:55unlimited. So that such that the best
- 2:58way to depict the history of life is as
- 3:00a great branching tree where the base of
- 3:03the tree can be represented or
- 3:05represents one or very few simple
- 3:08organisms, maybe even one-celled
- 3:09organisms that have morphed and changed
- 3:12gradually to produce all the forms of
- 3:14life we see today and the branches at
- 3:16the top of the tree represent the forms
- 3:18of life on planet Earth whether the
- 3:20elephants or eggplants or or kangaroos
- 3:23or all the wonderful things in all in
- 3:25Aussie land, right? Down under. So So
- 3:28and this is the idea of continuous
- 3:30biological change over time and a single
- 3:33tree of life is the is the the the the
- 3:37image that best depicts the history of
- 3:39life where the this axis is the time
- 3:41axis, this axis represents morphological
- 3:44form changes in form.
- 3:46>> Now is this necessarily Darwinian
- 3:47evolution or
- 3:48>> It's part of Darwin's theory but not the
- 3:50whole of it, okay? He had several
- 3:52chapters in the origin just on the
- 3:54argument for universal common descent.
- 3:56Um the third meaning of evolution is
- 3:58that there is an unguided undirected
- 4:00process known as natural selection
- 4:02>> Uh-huh.
- 4:03>> acting on random variations if you're a
- 4:05Darwinist, a classical Darwinist, or
- 4:07acting on random mutations if you're a
- 4:09more modern neo-Darwinist that has the
- 4:13ability to produce all that continuous
- 4:15change and that it does so without any
- 4:18guidance or direction
- 4:20>> What explains the mutations for that
- 4:22kind of Darwinist?
- 4:23>> Well, let's hold off on that for just a
- 4:25second just to get the definition
- 4:27straight. The the key thing is that is
- 4:30that the the Darwinian argument is an
- 4:33argument about the appearance of design.
- 4:36And there are lots of Darwinian the
- 4:37great Darwinian examples. He has one
- 4:39with wolves and and and prey deer. I
- 4:42think it's wolves and deer. The one I
- 4:44like to use which is sort of an
- 4:45adaptation of of a Darwinian argument I
- 4:48just I like to use the example of of
- 4:51sheep. Imagine you have some wool very
- 4:53woolly sheep in the far north of
- 4:55Scotland.
- 4:56>> Mhm.
- 4:56>> Okay, and you're a
- 4:59and you want to breed a woollier breed
- 5:00of sheep. What do you do?
- 5:02>> Mhm.
- 5:02>> You take the the woolliest males and the
- 5:04woolliest ewes and you allow only them
- 5:06to breed and then you repeat that
- 5:08through multiple multiple generations
- 5:10and cycles and eventually you'll get the
- 5:12really woolly sheep that are kind of
- 5:14like the ones that were in the
- 5:14VeggieTales movies. You know, so woolly
- 5:16they fall over. Um
- 5:18but what's going on there? Well, that's
- 5:20that's that's
- 5:23what's called artificial selection.
- 5:25There's an There's a the the the sheep
- 5:28has been
- 5:29certain attributes of the sheep have
- 5:31been maximized because of the
- 5:33intentional selection of the breeding
- 5:36pairs by the by the rancher sheep
- 5:38herder.
- 5:39Now, what Darwin did was in effect say
- 5:42Now, and if you're in a if you're in the
- 5:43far north of Scotland, you got a very
- 5:45woolly breed of sheep, you might have
- 5:47bred something that has an
- 5:49that's advantageous. It has as a an
- 5:52attribute that helps it survive.
- 5:54What Darwin said was
- 5:56this was not his example, but it's mine,
- 5:58but it's in same kind of reasoning.
- 6:00Imagine
- 6:02instead of selecting
- 6:04the woolliest males and females each
- 6:07generation, what if instead there was a
- 6:09series of very cold winters
- 6:12such that only the woolliest survived.
- 6:15Now after 20 generations or whatever it
- 6:18is, you're going to get the same
- 6:19outcome, but there was no mind there was
- 6:22no mind behind it. Instead of artificial
- 6:24selection, now you have nature doing the
- 6:28selection. Now you have natural
- 6:29selection.
- 6:30Now, how does that get rid of design?
- 6:33Well, in the Darwinian way of thinking,
- 6:35it gets rid of design because in the 19
- 6:38well, in the 19th century, the one of
- 6:41the most striking evidences of design
- 6:42that was often cited by biologists was
- 6:45the adaptation of organisms to their
- 6:46environment. Fish live in the water and
- 6:49they have they have fins and gills.
- 6:52Birds live in the air and they have
- 6:53wings.
- 6:54Organisms seem to have the attributes
- 6:56they need to survive in the environments
- 6:58in which they lived and that to 19th
- 7:01century and prior biologists seemed to
- 7:03be an evidence that there had been
- 7:05design in the placement of the organisms
- 7:07in their environment. Well, now Darwin
- 7:08comes along and he can explain
- 7:09adaptation
- 7:11without recourse to a designer, okay?
- 7:15It's now nature doing the selecting. Now
- 7:17you have a woolly breed of sheep in the
- 7:19far north of Scotland
- 7:21and you haven't had a a Scottish sheep
- 7:24herder doing the doing the selecting.
- 7:25It's been the winters, okay? And so now
- 7:28we've explained design the at least the
- 7:31the feature of design that attracted the
- 7:32attention of a lot of 19th century
- 7:33biologists without a designer. And so
- 7:36this is often very puzzling to the
- 7:37public when they hear Francisco Ayala or
- 7:40Richard Dawkins talking about
- 7:42biology as the study of complicated
- 7:43things that give the appearance of
- 7:44having been designed for a purpose, but
- 7:46it's only the appearance. Why only the
- 7:47appearance? Well, because there is this
- 7:49unguided undirected mechanism of natural
- 7:52selection acting on the on the random
- 7:54variations to favor only those
- 7:57variations which will confer survival in
- 7:59a given environment.
- 8:01So so far so good, okay? Now, what the
- 8:03Darwinists do
- 8:05is they say that that mechanism apply
- 8:08can explain everything, okay? And what I
- 8:10like to ask is, well, is that kind of is
- 8:13that adaptation the only evidence of
- 8:16design?
- 8:17And if not, does the Darwinian mechanism
- 8:20explain all the others?
- 8:22Okay? It does a very nice job of
- 8:24explaining small-scale variation and the
- 8:27adaptations that ensue within a given
- 8:29environment. Type one evolution, Yeah,
- 8:31yeah, essentially it's exactly.
- 8:34Um,
- 8:35and what evolutionary even leading
- 8:37evolutionary biologists are now
- 8:39acknowledging is that the mutation and
- 8:42we the selection and we can even bring
- 8:44in mutations even if we just add in them
- 8:46which is the
- 8:47variations in the sequences of the A's,
- 8:49C's, G's, and T's in the in the DNA,
- 8:51random changes.
- 8:52Uh, because that's now been posited as a
- 8:54source of variation upon which natural
- 8:56selection can act.
- 8:58Um,
- 8:59and what many even even leading
- 9:01evolutionary biologists are are asking
- 9:03is
- 9:04can that mechanism produce
- 9:07not just small-scale variation and the
- 9:10adaptations that ensue from it, but can
- 9:12they can that mechanism produce
- 9:15large-scale morphological innovation,
- 9:18fundamental
- 9:19fundamentally new changes in form? And
- 9:22there is a huge skepticism about that
- 9:24certainly among those of us who are
- 9:25proponents of intelligent design, but
- 9:28even among leading evolutionary
- 9:30biologists. There was a conference in
- 9:312016 convened by the Royal Society
- 9:36uh, in London, arguably the oldest and
- 9:38most august scientific body in the
- 9:40world, a group of evolutionary
- 9:41biologists convened a conference to
- 9:43explore
- 9:44the need for a new theory of evolution
- 9:47and the need for new mechanisms that
- 9:49would have the creative power that
- 9:51mutation and selection lack, something
- 9:53that would complement that. One of the
- 9:55conveners at the end of the conference
- 9:57said that the conference was
- 9:58characterized by a lack of
- 9:59momentousness. In essence, the the talks
- 10:03did a good job of characterizing the
- 10:05problems
- 10:06but did not come up with any solutions,
- 10:09any new mechanisms that would have the
- 10:11creative power that mutation and
- 10:12selection lacks. And I haven't really
- 10:14talked about some of the the evidence
- 10:17that the that the mechanism lacks the
- 10:18power, so we can do that. But but the
- 10:20point is that it's widely recognized now
- 10:23that the the mutation-selection
- 10:25mechanism does lack creative power and
- 10:28therefore there's something else is
- 10:29needed to account for the origin of
- 10:31genuine innovation in the history of
- 10:33life.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of What Does Evolution Mean? Stephen Meyer Explains Three Different Claims by Stephen Meyer, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,806 words across 305 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.