What 60 Minutes Didn't Tell Viewers About Trump's Deportations — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:0060 Minutes really nailed the Trump
- 0:01administration on third country
- 0:03deportations, or did it?
- 0:05>> Deportations like these can be legal,
- 0:08and past administrations have carried
- 0:10them out, but not at this scale.
- 0:13Our 5-month investigation uncovered
- 0:15cases in which people ended up in places
- 0:18where US immigration judges said they
- 0:21would likely be persecuted or tortured.
- 0:24>> I'm Rich Lowry of National Review, and
- 0:25this was a 60 Minutes report that got a
- 0:26lot of attention about so-called third
- 0:28country deportations. That's when
- 0:30there's a legal immigrant in the United
- 0:31States can't be deported to his home
- 0:33country because he supposedly faces a
- 0:36threat of persecution there, and then
- 0:37Trump administration then deports him to
- 0:40a third country, and that country
- 0:42deports him to the original home
- 0:45country. So, this is particularly
- 0:46notable because we have the entirety of
- 0:49the interview with the Trump
- 0:51administration immigration official on
- 0:54this policy question, and we can see
- 0:57what 60 Minutes decided to take and what
- 1:00it decided to leave on the cutting room
- 1:02floor. So, this is a great test case on
- 1:05how 60 Minutes operates and how it
- 1:07distorts its journalism. Also, a window
- 1:11into the how the media operates in
- 1:12general on the issue of immigration. So,
- 1:15I want to go into detail what we saw in
- 1:18the entirety of that interview, what we
- 1:19saw in the 60 Minutes report itself, go
- 1:22into a little bit of the policy and
- 1:24legalities around these kind of
- 1:26deportations, and then make the broader
- 1:28point about how the media is biased on
- 1:31this kind of policy question more from
- 1:3360 Minutes.
- 1:34>> On July 11th, Moussa Diowara, who's been
- 1:37in the US for 25 years with no criminal
- 1:40record, was wrapping up his night shift
- 1:42as an Uber driver, heading to the home
- 1:44in the Houston suburbs he owns with his
- 1:46wife and children, who are US citizens.
- 1:49But when he pulled up, US Immigration
- 1:52and Customs Enforcement agents were
- 1:54waiting for him.
- 1:55>> So, we got a warrant for your arrest of
- 1:57a for
- 1:58outside of the US.
- 1:59Okay?
- 2:00>> After 3 weeks in ICE detention in Texas,
- 2:03without being able to speak to his
- 2:04lawyer or a judge, he was put on a plane
- 2:07and deported to West Africa.
- 2:11And that's where we met him, 2 months
- 2:13after his arrest, thousands of miles
- 2:15away from his Texas home.
- 2:18>> For me, it was like a a nightmare.
- 2:20It's like a Oh my god, what's going to
- 2:22happen?
- 2:22>> So, the basic situation here is this guy
- 2:24comes to the US, overstays his visa,
- 2:28gets an order of removal, but says like
- 2:31you can't send me back to Mali because
- 2:32I'll be persecuted there. Judge accepts
- 2:34that, and he stays here for a long time.
- 2:37Trump administration comes in and says,
- 2:39"Okay, well, we can't send you to Mali.
- 2:41We're going to send you to another
- 2:43country. We're going to send you to
- 2:44Ghana." So, they send him to Ghana, then
- 2:45Ghana sends him to Mali, then he escapes
- 2:48Mali into another undisclosed, in the 60
- 2:51Minutes report, African country. Now,
- 2:54the correspondent here interviews a guy,
- 2:56a DHS lawyer named James Percival, and
- 2:58as far as you can tell from the 60
- 3:00Minutes segment itself, he's on his back
- 3:03foot the whole time. He is on defense.
- 3:06At one point, he tries to push back
- 3:08really forcefully and say, "Look, we've
- 3:10talked about it Ghana enough. Can't we
- 3:11talk about something else?" And the
- 3:13correspondent has a ready answer for
- 3:15that.
- 3:15>> Seems like you're very focused on Ghana.
- 3:17Do you want to talk about any of the
- 3:17other countries?
- 3:18>> Sure. Sierra Leone, when folks arrive,
- 3:20they receive a pamphlet. The pamphlet
- 3:21says, "Sierra Leone is serving as a
- 3:23temporary transit location while
- 3:24arrangements are made to return you to
- 3:26your country of origin."
- 3:28>> Boom, that suggests she's got an answer
- 3:30to whatever he says. But then, you look
- 3:33at the entire interview. Percival
- 3:35complained on X about the editing of
- 3:37this. 60 Minutes agreed to release the
- 3:39whole thing, and you look at the whole
- 3:4145-minute interview, and you get an
- 3:43entirely different impression. In fact,
- 3:46what we just saw might be the only good
- 3:49moment for the reporter in the entirety
- 3:51of this interview, because as much as a
- 3:53interview is kind of a confrontation, an
- 3:55argument, a joust, and what you see, if
- 3:58you look at the whole thing, is
- 3:59repeatedly, she has to concede points to
- 4:03Percival. He makes the point, "Look, a
- 4:05lot of these people are violent
- 4:07criminals and we have to find some way
- 4:09to get them out of the country." Take a
- 4:10look at this.
- 4:11>> There have been some horrific cases. I
- 4:13follow your Twitter. I follow what DHS
- 4:15puts out of these specific profiles of
- 4:16folks who are violent offenders who have
- 4:19wreaked havoc in in American communities
- 4:21and I totally hear you on that point and
- 4:22I want to talk about that.
- 4:23>> Here she is conceding again.
- 4:25>> I cuz I I I really take your point about
- 4:27these violent offenders. I do.
- 4:28>> Then she says, "Hey, look, you're always
- 4:29bringing up murderers and rapists, but
- 4:32those are very small percentage of these
- 4:35cases." She ends up conceding here as
- 4:37well.
- 4:38>> Based on this internal DHS document, in
- 4:40Trump's first year, 0.5% of those
- 4:42detained, 0.5% were accused or convicted
- 4:45of homicide. 1.4% were accused or
- 4:47convicted of sexual assault. I mean,
- 4:49together that's that's 2%.
- 4:51>> And isn't it wonderful that we're
- 4:52getting those people out of the country?
- 4:54>> 100%.
- 4:54>> be the limit of who has to follow the
- 4:57law? Just rapists and murderers have to
- 4:58follow the law?
- 4:59>> I I take that point.
- 5:01>> our journey together through this
- 5:02interview real quick, by the way, to
- 5:04urge you subscribe to the National
- 5:05Review channel if you like videos like
- 5:07this. If you're not going to do it for
- 5:07the substance, do it for my magnetic
- 5:09personality or whatever the reason, we'd
- 5:11really appreciate it if you hit
- 5:13subscribe. Then you have these moments
- 5:16in this interview where he rhetorically
- 5:18just wipes her out. He just blasts her
- 5:22out of the water. One moment here where
- 5:25she seems to be suggesting, "You know
- 5:27what? If illegal immigrants don't commit
- 5:29murder or rape, they're basically
- 5:32law-abiding." Look at this.
- 5:34>> You know, cuz I hear a lot about the
- 5:36violent offenders. Point taken. But what
- 5:39I don't hear about is the law-abiding
- 5:41folks who in our reporting is more than
- 5:43half.
- 5:43>> You're suggesting that people who are in
- 5:45this country illegally are law-abiding?
- 5:47>> Let's say don't have a criminal record
- 5:48outside of an immigration offense. Maybe
- 5:50overstaying a tourist visa.
- 5:52>> So, if you are in this country
- 5:53illegally, it is virtually impossible
- 5:56for you to live in this country and not
- 5:57commit additional legal violations
- 5:59because
- 6:00uh you know, working without
- 6:01authorization, um identity theft,
- 6:04there's a lot of illegality that goes on
- 6:07when you are breaking the law. But I do
- 6:09really uh reject your characterization
- 6:12of someone who is in this country
- 6:13illegally and breaking our laws as
- 6:15{quote} law-abiding. I think that's
- 6:16fundamentally inaccurate and unfair.
- 6:18>> Okay, fair enough.
- 6:19>> Then they start arguing about the matter
- 6:21of persecution or torture cuz he makes
- 6:24the case, "Hey, look, if we're sending
- 6:27these illegal immigrants to third
- 6:29countries and then they send them on to
- 6:31their home country and they do indeed
- 6:34have a totally legitimate fear of
- 6:36torture and persecution there, you
- 6:38should be able to tell me about some
- 6:40cases where they've actually been
- 6:41tortured or persecuted, God forbid."
- 6:44Here's that exchange.
- 6:45>> I guess one one thing I would point out,
- 6:47I mean
- 6:48are you suggesting that when these
- 6:49people went to their home countries that
- 6:50they were persecuted or tortured? I
- 6:52mean, are you suggesting that
- 6:53>> suggesting that a US a US judge said
- 6:55that, a federal judge said that.
- 6:56>> they were persecuted or tortured when
- 6:57they they went to their home country?
- 6:59>> they were more than likely to be
- 7:00tortured or persecuted if they were
- 7:02returned to their home country.
- 7:04And then they were sent to Ghana and
- 7:05returned to their home country
- 7:06regardless of that
- 7:07>> they got to their home country, are you
- 7:08suggesting that they were persecuted or
- 7:09tortured?
- 7:10>> Some have faced violence.
- 7:12But that's not what I'm alleging, no.
- 7:13>> Well, but again, so you're suggesting
- 7:15that Ghana is not accurately
- 7:17adjudicating whether they fear
- 7:19persecution or torture in their home
- 7:21country. If that were true, you would
- 7:22expect those people to return to their
- 7:24home country and then face persecution
- 7:26or torture because Ghana would be
- 7:27getting it wrong. And if they're going
- 7:29to their home country and you're not
- 7:30hearing claims that they're being
- 7:31persecuted or tortured, then that
- 7:32suggests that Ghana's procedures are
- 7:34adequate. Now again, I work for the US
- 7:36government. Ghana's got its own
- 7:37procedures. But to me, the ultimate
- 7:39question is are they actually sending
- 7:42someone somewhere where they're going to
- 7:43be persecuted or tortured? And it
- 7:45doesn't sound like you're making that
- 7:46claim.
- 7:47>> I I'm not saying that I have cases that
- 7:49I'm going to show you where this is
- 7:50happening mostly because, you know, this
- 7:52is all very recent.
- 7:53>> includes none of those clips. Why? Cuz
- 7:56it'd make Percival look too good. It
- 7:58would show that his case at least has
- 8:01some persuasive power and also
- 8:03demonstrate, by the way, at least
- 8:04implicitly that she has a bias. So why
- 8:06would she include any of that? You know,
- 8:08a correspondent's not going to do a long
- 8:10confrontational interview and then to
- 8:12select the bits that make her look bad.
- 8:15And this has been a problem with 60
- 8:16Minutes journalism since the beginning.
- 8:18They do these long interviews, they
- 8:20don't play them in their entirety, and
- 8:22they cut and paste the bits that make
- 8:24their case for them or make their
- 8:26correspondent look good. And that's just
- 8:28an inherent bias to how they operate.
- 8:31Now, I'm very glad that Bari Weiss is at
- 8:32CBS. I think she's doing a great job,
- 8:34but she obviously hasn't taken care of
- 8:37this problem, if it can be dealt with at
- 8:40all. Now, when we get to the policy
- 8:42question here, Percival repeatedly makes
- 8:45the case cuz he has to repeat everything
- 8:47over and over to her again that these
- 8:50third-party deportations are legal. He's
- 8:53absolutely right about this. This is a
- 8:55Congressional Research Service report.
- 8:57The Immigration and Nationality Act says
- 8:59forth rules governing the selection of
- 9:01the country to which an alien ordered
- 9:02removed may be transferred. Aliens found
- 9:04in the interior of the United States
- 9:06who've been ordered removed generally
- 9:07must be removed to the countries they
- 9:09designate, typically their home
- 9:11countries, or if that's not possible,
- 9:12other countries to which they have
- 9:13connections. The INA also provides that
- 9:16the Secretary of the Department of
- 9:17Homeland Security may potentially remove
- 9:19aliens to other countries willing to
- 9:21accept them, referred to as third
- 9:22countries, when removal to the
- 9:24designated country or a country to which
- 9:26the alien has a connection would be
- 9:27impractical, inadvisable, or impossible.
- 9:30Now, just because something is legal
- 9:32doesn't mean it's necessarily good or
- 9:34advisable policy. You watch the 60
- 9:36Minutes report, and you naturally have
- 9:38compassion for this guy. But what
- 9:40happened in prior administrations? They
- 9:42had much too lax an approach to
- 9:44immigration enforcement. They said,
- 9:46"Okay, we can't send you back to your
- 9:47home country. You can just stay in the
- 9:48United States." Sometimes this did
- 9:51involve violent criminals staying here.
- 9:54Regardless, it wasn't a great
- 9:56arrangement. Now, the Trump
- 9:56administration has now pushed the
- 9:58pendulum way over in the other direction
- 10:01to make up for all this lax enforcement
- 10:03and to enforce the laws more to a T, and
- 10:07this can also lead to some unwelcome
- 10:09outcomes and maybe callous outcomes.
- 10:12Now, Percival is correct in points he
- 10:14made during the course of this interview
- 10:16that sometimes you send these immigrants
- 10:18to the third country and they're like,
- 10:20"You know what? I don't want to be in
- 10:22this third country. Forget about it.
- 10:24Just send me home." But, it also may be
- 10:26that a country like Ghana just has a nod
- 10:28and wink arrangement with us where we
- 10:30send them to Ghana and they immediately
- 10:31go to their home country, no questions
- 10:33asked. That shouldn't happen. But, let's
- 10:35focus on this guy some more and the key
- 10:38question of why he said he feared
- 10:41persecution in Mali because that gets to
- 10:44a key element of the decision-making
- 10:47about his case, about this policy
- 10:50generally, and also goes to the honesty
- 10:53and fairness of the 60 Minutes report.
- 10:56Now, another point that Percival made
- 10:57repeatedly in that interview is this
- 11:00one.
- 11:00>> They're not always telling the truth. We
- 11:01know the illegal alien population lies a
- 11:03lot.
- 11:03>> Now, that seems an unassailably correct
- 11:06point and a really important one, right?
- 11:08You can't take at face value what a lot
- 11:11of these illegal immigrants say because
- 11:13they have an incentive to lie, right? If
- 11:16they get away with a lie, they get to
- 11:17stay in the United States, which is a
- 11:19jackpot for them. So, what about this
- 11:22guy? What What 60 Minutes would lead you
- 11:25to believe from their report is that he
- 11:28converted to Christianity and that's the
- 11:30reason why he didn't want to go back to
- 11:31Mali, a majority Muslim country that
- 11:35doesn't like Christians very much.
- 11:36>> Part of the reason he didn't feel safe,
- 11:38he told us, is that he'd converted to
- 11:40Christianity.
- 11:44Mali's a Muslim majority nation with an
- 11:46Islamist insurgency.
- 11:48>> Okay, but then there's also this cryptic
- 11:50reference in the 60 Minutes report.
- 11:52>> DHS also questioned the credibility of
- 11:54Diawara's arguments for fearing
- 11:56persecution in Mali.
- 11:58>> So, that's kind of curious. Why did DHS
- 12:00question the credibility of his claim?
- 12:03Well, 60 Minutes didn't include this,
- 12:05but it's emerged since that a key part
- 12:07of his claim for why he didn't want to
- 12:08go back to Mali is because he's gay. Fox
- 12:12News got his asylum application. Here's
- 12:14some key passages. He says he can't go
- 12:16back to Mali because he had experienced
- 12:18extreme punishment and persecution based
- 12:20on the ground of my sexual orientation.
- 12:22As I can recall, I felt very differently
- 12:24from the children of my age around my
- 12:25home and neighborhood. Although I was
- 12:27born as a boy, things appeared
- 12:28differently for me as I was already
- 12:30having female behaviors and feelings. As
- 12:32he grew older, he was feeling uneasy,
- 12:34fearful that his hidden secret would be
- 12:35discovered. The untenable situation I
- 12:37found myself in my country brought me
- 12:39misery and anger. Since I came to the
- 12:41USA, I had the possibility to express my
- 12:43feelings to men without any
- 12:44embarrassment, no reserve. Indeed, my
- 12:46tribal group and community as a whole
- 12:48had reported my sexual orientation to my
- 12:50family back home because such behavior
- 12:51is unwelcome in my society. My life is
- 12:54henceforth threatened if I have to go
- 12:55back to my country because I could be
- 12:57executed either by the Islamic group or
- 12:59the community. Then he mentions
- 13:01Christianity. Additionally, my situation
- 13:02worsened when I changed my religion to
- 13:04become Christian. So, what's wrong with
- 13:05that? It's certainly plausible that if
- 13:07you're a gay person, you might fear
- 13:09persecution in Mali. Well, the problem
- 13:11is he has a family in the United States.
- 13:14In fact, the entire ending of the 60
- 13:16Minutes report is about how
- 13:18heart-rending it is that he's been
- 13:19separated from his wife and kids. So,
- 13:23how's it possible that CBS investigated
- 13:25this, as I said at the top, for 5
- 13:28months? They went to Africa, spent time
- 13:30with this guy, they spent time with his
- 13:31family, they did a long interview with
- 13:32the DHS official, they went back and
- 13:34forth with DHS, and they didn't know
- 13:38that a key part of his asylum
- 13:39application was that he was gay? I find
- 13:42that very hard to believe. Didn't they
- 13:44ask when DHS said, "Well, we have reason
- 13:46to question the credibility of his
- 13:47claim." Didn't they ask, "Why?" But even
- 13:50if they knew this, it would have been
- 13:51impossible for them to include in this
- 13:54report, right? Cuz it would have blown
- 13:56the whole thing out of the water. It
- 13:57would have seemed completely ridiculous
- 13:59to say, "Well, he can't go back to Mali
- 14:01because he's gay, but here's his family
- 14:03that's distraught because he's been sent
- 14:05back to Africa." So, this just goes to
- 14:09how 60 Minutes hid the ball in two key
- 14:13ways on this report that would have made
- 14:16the whole thing feel differently or
- 14:18would actually have convinced them not
- 14:20to air it at all. One, they made
- 14:23Percival sound much worse in the
- 14:25interview than he actually did. And two,
- 14:28they kept from the viewers the reason
- 14:32why he said he couldn't go back to Mali.
- 14:35And this just goes to how you can't
- 14:37trust the media on almost anything
- 14:39having to do with the Trump
- 14:39administration, but especially anything
- 14:41having to do with immigration policy so
- 14:44much of the media has such a big
- 14:45ideological axe to grind on this issue.
- 14:49As they say on X, you can't hate the
- 14:52media enough. Hey, by the way, I have a
- 14:54couple other videos for you. Did one the
- 14:55other day on what Ilhan Omar's real name
- 14:58is. Also did one on this annoying
- 15:00activist in France who's been justifying
- 15:02the so-called mostly peaceful
- 15:04demonstrations. Curious what you make of
- 15:06this one, please leave a comment. If you
- 15:08like this video, hey, you've gotten this
- 15:09far, just click the like button. And
- 15:10once more, I humbly beseech you to
- 15:13subscribe to the National View channel.
- 15:15I'm Chris Larson, over and out.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of What 60 Minutes Didn't Tell Viewers About Trump's Deportations by National Review, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,995 words across 459 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.