Vou SALVAR sua REDAÇÃO do ENEM 2026 🙏 — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00This video is going to save your Enem
- 0:01exam, because it's for those who know
- 0:03absolutely nothing about essay writing
- 0:05and have to turn in the best essay of
- 0:06their lives in a few days. So I'm going
- 0:08to give you this ready-to-use template,
- 0:10which is the same essay model I taught
- 0:12last year, and this is an official 1000
- 0:14-point essay. So just copy what I tell
- 0:17you in this class, and I'll also explain
- 0:19what has changed for this year. Pen and
- 0:21paper in hand. Let's go. In the
- 0:22introduction, you will have three parts
- 0:24. Each part will start with a capital
- 0:26letter and end with a period. So, one,
- 0:28two up to here, three until the end. In
- 0:30the first one, you include a reference,
- 0:33it could be a movie, series, song, soap
- 0:35opera, book, or historical period. I'll
- 0:37put all the options that work on the
- 0:39screen. Sara, oh my god, but I don't
- 0:40have any repertoire at all. Calm down,
- 0:41I'll explain later in the video how I
- 0:43manage to get a repertoire for any topic
- 0:45. But for now, keep in mind that the
- 0:47first part of my text will be the
- 0:48reference. Then comes a connective that
- 0:50I really love, this one here. When
- 0:51transposing the literary bias, the
- 0:53accentuation of this problematic issue
- 0:55is perceived.
- 0:57This is one of the things I see people
- 0:59losing points on the most lately, where
- 1:01they put "from this perspective" and
- 1:03then they start talking about other
- 1:05things and don't connect well what they
- 1:07just said.
- 1:09In other words, when they talk about
- 1:10this problematic issue, it's the
- 1:11exclusion of the elderly. I would be
- 1:13even more specific just to be safe. For
- 1:15example, the accentuation of negligence
- 1:17regarding the elderly is perceived.
- 1:20So I avoid very generic words like "
- 1:22problematic." But of course, that's not
- 1:23what will cost you the 1000, but it will
- 1:25provide a better guarantee. And so,
- 1:26what's the deal? Check out this tip. In
- 1:29the second part, then, of my
- 1:30introduction, I will make this link.
- 1:33So I'll take a little word I put here to
- 1:35be able to make this connection, like,
- 1:37if I said there's exclusion there, I'll
- 1:40say that when transposing the literary
- 1:42bias, there is an accentuation of this
- 1:44problem. And then what do you put? The
- 1:47topic, man. This is practically a copy
- 1:48of the topic. Perspective regarding
- 1:50aging in contemporary Brazil. So the
- 1:53first part of our introduction is the
- 1:55reference. Later on, I will explain how
- 1:57we can get references for any topic. The
- 1:59second part is linking the reference to
- 2:01the topic, and preferably include every
- 2:04word that is in the topic. And the third
- 2:06part is what people call the thesis,
- 2:07which even today you don't know what a
- 2:09thesis is, man. It's very simple. You
- 2:11will state what you are going to analyze
- 2:12, that is, what will come next. It's
- 2:14like a summary of what's going to happen
- 2:15. And then you take your first idea,
- 2:17your first argument, and put it here.
- 2:19And you put your second argument here.
- 2:21And then you say it's a challenge for
- 2:22the longevity of society, or whatever.
- 2:24But Sara, how do I know what to put here
- 2:26? Well, the logic is, you'll write the
- 2:28introduction after you've done the
- 2:30argumentation. So, during the test, I
- 2:31like to start with the argumentation,
- 2:33which are these two paragraphs here.
- 2:35After that's ready, then I move on to
- 2:37the introduction. So, let's think about
- 2:39creating this paragraph from scratch. I
- 2:41just found out what the topic is. The
- 2:43first thing we do is take the reference
- 2:45, which in this case the person chose
- 2:47the Sexagenarian Law. Remember when I
- 2:49said that one of the references can be a
- 2:51historical period or a historical fact?
- 2:53And the big trick is to pull the
- 2:55argument out from inside the reference.
- 2:57You don't create an argument. You think
- 2:59: "Okay, I have the Sexagenarian Law."
- 3:02What is the problem within this
- 3:03reference? It was the part about
- 3:05exclusion, the lack of a dignified
- 3:07future. So, how are you going to start
- 3:09this paragraph? You're going to start
- 3:11with a mental "I think that." What do
- 3:13you mean, mental? Because you can't
- 3:14write "I think that," right? So you will
- 3:15say the following: "I think that the
- 3:17difficult promotion of a dignified
- 3:19future for the elderly stems from a
- 3:21national development process based on
- 3:23socio-spatial exclusion." Wow Sara, but
- 3:25I don't know how to write like that.
- 3:26Calm down, you're going to think the
- 3:27following. I think that the elderly
- 3:29don't have a dignified future because
- 3:31they suffer from social exclusion, which
- 3:33in this case, society excludes them.
- 3:35That's easier, right? So, first you
- 3:36create the idea, then you add pretty
- 3:38words. But one thing, the ENEM doesn't
- 3:41want complex words, so it's much better
- 3:43that you have good ideas. Even written
- 3:45in a simple way, rather than super fancy
- 3:47words that mean nothing. In the
- 3:49argumentation, we will have four parts.
- 3:50The first is what I just mentioned,
- 3:52called a topic sentence, which is the "
- 3:53I think that," right? I think the
- 3:56problem of aging comes from the
- 3:58exclusion of the elderly. That is the
- 4:01topic sentence. But it's important, you
- 4:02don't write "I think that". Or "I think
- 4:03that" is just for you to think about how
- 4:05to write. Two, comes the reference part
- 4:07. So this looks really cool, see. "This
- 4:09can be verified" because arguing is
- 4:10basically proving that what you say is
- 4:13really like that.
- 4:15And here's a thing many people get wrong
- 4:16, and I would be even stricter about it
- 4:18for this year's Enem: instead of putting
- 4:20a period here, adding the reference—
- 4:22which people often do with Thomas Hobbes
- 4:23—putting another period, and then
- 4:25continuing to talk about the problem,
- 4:27the reference ends up completely
- 4:28disconnected from both things.
- 4:31So this is wonderful: "this can be
- 4:32verified," then you talk about colonial
- 4:34Brazil.
- 4:35So, regarding changes for this year's
- 4:37Enem, I would be stricter, because it's
- 4:39not actually a change in the rule, but a
- 4:41change in how strict they are being
- 4:43about this.
- 4:44They are being stricter with this
- 4:46connection between the first part and
- 4:48the second part, which you can solve
- 4:50with this, and the reference with the
- 4:52rest, which in this essay is in this
- 4:54part about "this segregationist attitude
- 4:56."
- 4:57And folks, a tip for linking: you take
- 5:00something like "this form of exclusion"
- 5:03or "this segregationist attitude" or "
- 5:05the position of this scholar."
- 5:08Fine, but the logic is, you are going to
- 5:10link it to the previous part. Now we
- 5:11enter the third part, which is cause and
- 5:14consequence. I'll do the following: I'll
- 5:16take the problem that's inside the
- 5:18reference, which is the segregationist
- 5:20attitude, and I'll say where it leads.
- 5:22So I'll say, "this segregationist
- 5:24attitude masks the need to reverse this
- 5:26setback." And if you don't reverse this
- 5:29setback, it naturalizes the silencing.
- 5:31And this silencing culturally produces
- 5:33the idea of inferiority for this group.
- 5:36So you see that I'm going to create a
- 5:37path of arrows, and this is the most
- 5:38important part of the argument.
- 5:40Spend time here. The thing is, you
- 5:42cannot leave gaps. What is a gap? You
- 5:45saying: "Ah, this segregationist
- 5:47attitude generates social inequality."
- 5:50I'm going to ask you, how did it get
- 5:52from here to there? Then you have to
- 5:53explain. Ah, because it's harder for the
- 5:56elderly to get a good job in the labor
- 5:57market, because this happens, and then
- 5:59that happens, and something else happens
- 6:01, and then it generates social
- 6:02inequality.
- 6:03And this is where you will gain the most
- 6:05points.
- 6:06So, write it down when you're doing it,
- 6:09write "this attitude leads to that."
- 6:12This second thing leads to the third,
- 6:14this third leads to the fourth. And four
- 6:16things like that, okay? Which would be,
- 6:18I'll repeat it one last time, just so
- 6:19everyone understands. Also, go ahead and
- 6:21like this video and subscribe to the
- 6:23channel. What are the four? One,
- 6:24segregationist attitude. What happens?
- 6:27It masks the need to reverse it. This
- 6:29masking naturalizes the silencing. And
- 6:31this naturalization of silencing
- 6:33culturally produces the idea of the
- 6:34elderly's inferiority. Got it? If you
- 6:37understood this, you will do very well
- 6:39on the Enem. I call the fourth part a
- 6:41somewhat optional part. Most essays,
- 6:43perfect score, good score, have it, but
- 6:45I also know many very good essays.
- 6:47scoring 980 and such, that didn't have
- 6:49this final part, but it is interesting
- 6:51for you to recap, for you to kind of say
- 6:52, look, see?
- 6:54And then you add little words that
- 6:56convey your opinion, like: "Thus, the
- 6:58nation's continuous regression becomes
- 7:00undeniable."
- 7:01This part here is really cool.
- 7:03this "important,""undeniable,"
- 7:05especially "important," because there's
- 7:07a myth about the Enem essay that you
- 7:09can't include your opinion, but one of
- 7:11the grading criteria on the Enem is
- 7:13precisely whether you defend a point of
- 7:15view; you have an opinion.
- 7:17So when you state it's important, that's
- 7:20not a fact—it's also a fact that it's
- 7:22important, but it's your opinion, like,
- 7:24I think it's important, I think it's
- 7:26undeniable. Here it's a bit mixed with
- 7:28fact and opinion, but there are some you
- 7:30can add, for example, "grave," man.
- 7:31Grave is a fact. No. Grave is an
- 7:33analysis of yours where you are saying
- 7:34it is grave. So add "negative." Like,
- 7:37this generates negative consequences
- 7:40such as this and that. So use negative,
- 7:42grave, insufficient, negligent, because
- 7:45these little words, they by themselves
- 7:47will get you more points. If you
- 7:49understood this, you will think the
- 7:50following. In number one, I will state
- 7:52my opinion without the "I think that"?
- 7:54Written, not just mental. I think the
- 7:56problem is because of that. Two, include
- 7:58a reference, remembering to connect it
- 8:00with the before and after. Three, you do
- 8:03that 1 2 3 4 sequence. And four is like
- 8:06telling the Enem, look, see? Of the type
- 8:10"it is undeniable." In other words, do
- 8:12you see that I told the truth? That is
- 8:14arguing. If you understood, look, this
- 8:16is exactly what happens here. Part one.
- 8:18I think state negligence perpetuates
- 8:20social aversion to the inherent
- 8:22population aging. Like, I think this
- 8:24here is the problem, right? Then there
- 8:26is a little linking sentence between
- 8:27this problem and the reference.
- 8:29Including here, look, is the overview to
- 8:31connect the two things. Then there’s the
- 8:32reference right there. This here is
- 8:34wonderful. The scholar's position is
- 8:37valid. I would undoubtedly use this here
- 8:39, because first, "valid" shows your
- 8:41opinion. I think it’s valid. And you
- 8:43take the opportunity to connect it with
- 8:44the thoughts of the philosopher, the
- 8:46scholar, etc. Let’s make a parenthetical
- 8:47note here about "pocket repertoire,"
- 8:49because this has been a change over the
- 8:50last two years. In the past, if I used,
- 8:52for example, Thomas Hobbes, Aristotle,
- 8:55the Constitution, etc., they would look
- 8:57at that and say, "That works." But now
- 9:00they are much stricter about this
- 9:02repertoire not simply being memorized
- 9:04for any topic.
- 9:07So, here you see that Clarice speaks
- 9:08exactly about exclusion, that the
- 9:10Sexagenarian Law speaks about the
- 9:11elderly, that this researcher speaks
- 9:13about the lack of recognition of the
- 9:14elderly; in other words, all the
- 9:15references speak about the topic, which
- 9:17is extremely difficult in this case,
- 9:19because I imagine that you, like me,
- 9:20perhaps didn't know, for example, that
- 9:22Rui Braga and Clarice spoke about the
- 9:23elderly.
- 9:25And look, I love literature, but I
- 9:26probably won't know absolutely every
- 9:28book or thing that speaks about the ENEM
- 9:30topics. So, if you are like me, I will
- 9:32teach you how to do this. What I knew
- 9:34was the Sexagenarian Law, right? Because
- 9:35we study that in school. So, remember I
- 9:37told you I was going to explain how to
- 9:38have repertoire for all topics? Hold on
- 9:40, I'll get there. So, remember the four
- 9:41parts? First, your opinion. Second, the
- 9:44reference. Third, what happens next? So
- 9:46here the logic is that inefficient
- 9:48public policies, the ones the scholar
- 9:50mentioned, generate the precariousness
- 9:53of well-being. And this precariousness
- 9:55of well-being, which he then explains is
- 9:57qualifying this age group as unimportant
- 9:58—that’s cool too, because what does it
- 10:00mean to make well-being precarious? If
- 10:02you simply put that, the person will ask
- 10:04you: "What the heck is making well-being
- 10:06precarious?" And then you give examples
- 10:07, or you explain it—which I think is
- 10:09harder—or you give examples. Want to see
- 10:11another essay that does this, look? to
- 10:13diseases that affect this age. If you
- 10:15put just that, you leave a gap, so then
- 10:17you add things like diabetes,
- 10:19hypertension. Another one is the
- 10:20importance of professional inclusion,
- 10:22representation, important spaces. If you
- 10:24only wrote "important spaces," it’s
- 10:25wrong. Then you add what these important
- 10:28spaces are: public offices and
- 10:29university spots. So, any generic term
- 10:32you include, for example, "this leads to
- 10:34serious consequences," which is
- 10:35something I actually recommend you
- 10:37include. But you have to state what that
- 10:39consequence is. And the easiest way to
- 10:41do that is with an example. So,
- 10:42sometimes people were losing points here
- 10:44because they didn't include examples in
- 10:46their essays. So, besides this, if any
- 10:48of these items are a bit too generic,
- 10:50add an example and it'll turn out well.
- 10:53So, going back. One, inefficient public
- 10:55policies lead to the precariousness of
- 10:57well-being. Then explain what this
- 10:58precariousness of well-being is. Three,
- 11:00suppressing a healthy future. Oh, really
- 11:02, does it need to be four? No, sometimes
- 11:04we do three, sometimes four, sometimes
- 11:06five, but it tends to be around that
- 11:08average, 3, 4, 5.
- 11:09Also, notice how huge the paragraphs are
- 11:12in essays that get very high scores.
- 11:15So, try to read this final sentence here
- 11:17. Therefore, this hostile situation
- 11:19needs to be reversed. I don't think it's
- 11:21that fundamental. It's that optional
- 11:23fourth one. I really like the word "
- 11:24hostile" because the person puts in
- 11:26their opinion, and it's interesting
- 11:28because you put this in the last
- 11:29argumentative paragraph before the
- 11:31proposal, and you're kind of
- 11:32anticipating that you're going to arrive
- 11:34at a proposal there. I think it's OK,
- 11:36but it's not like, "wow, this will give
- 11:37you the highest score in the world." So
- 11:39to wrap up, intervention proposal, and
- 11:40then I'll talk about references.
- 11:42For the proposal, you need to have five
- 11:44elements: the agent, what will be done,
- 11:46the action, the means/mode, and the
- 11:48purpose, which are the four main ones,
- 11:50plus a detail, which I'll call at least
- 11:52one detail, because I would include more
- 11:54than one. What is a detail? It's when
- 11:56you take any of the other four and add a
- 11:58little extra information. But this
- 11:59little extra information can't be just
- 12:01anything. What would I do? If I include
- 12:04the agent, I would add why I chose this
- 12:07agent. And you can include it how? Since
- 12:09this branch is responsible for doing
- 12:11that. Regarding the action, you could,
- 12:13for example, detail it, but I find that
- 12:15more difficult. I wouldn't detail the
- 12:17action because you're left wondering if
- 12:18it's a detail or if this is just
- 12:20explaining the action. I would include
- 12:22examples for the means/mode as a detail
- 12:24, which is "by creating this project."
- 12:27Then you can add, for example, in
- 12:29schools and in basic health units. I'm
- 12:32just making up another one.
- 12:33You will conduct a public consultation
- 12:36by distributing a form on social media.
- 12:39Then put a comma, like on Instagram and
- 12:41Facebook. You can even include brand
- 12:43names, that’s no problem. And so the
- 12:45purpose, what's the deal with that? I
- 12:47would make a single proposal, because we
- 12:50don't have enough lines for two, but my
- 12:53proposal has to, in a way, address my
- 12:56arguments.
- 12:57So I would use this purpose section to
- 12:59say the following: the first purpose
- 13:01relates to the first argument, that is,
- 13:02demystifying ideas stemming from the
- 13:04colonization of Brazil—wasn't that my
- 13:06first argument?
- 13:07And the second argument is to highlight
- 13:09the role of elderly people. And to add
- 13:11detail, you state that one is a
- 13:13consequence of the other. Of course, it
- 13:15has to make sense, but by putting this
- 13:17here and a comma, as a consequence of
- 13:18highlighting, you have added a detail.
- 13:20Sara, how do I end the essay? I like to
- 13:22end with "thus.""After all" is also okay
- 13:24, but I prefer "thus." And then I add a
- 13:26perspective, which is like, if the
- 13:28proposal works, what good will come of
- 13:29it. Here she ended with how it is not
- 13:32acceptable, which is also correct, but
- 13:33the coolest part is this part right here
- 13:35, that you will relate back to your
- 13:37first reference, Clarice. So, the logic
- 13:40is, if your reference is something good
- 13:42mentioned earlier, you can say: "
- 13:44Brazilian society will approach the
- 13:46standards seen in [name], which is your
- 13:48initial reference."
- 13:50Or here, since it was something bad,
- 13:51like people not remembering the elderly
- 13:53, you can say it is not acceptable that
- 13:54what was denounced in your reference
- 13:56continues to happen.
- 13:58Taking the opportunity, just as I
- 13:59mentioned "thus," as I usually finish
- 14:00with "thus," these are the connectors I
- 14:02would use, okay? Given this scenario,
- 14:04furthermore, it could also be "in
- 14:05addition to this." And, therefore, if
- 14:07you use these three, you don't need to
- 14:09think about anything else related to
- 14:10these inter-paragraph connectors.
- 14:13Of course, we also have to include
- 14:15others like "under this perspective,""
- 14:17therefore,""given that," as these
- 14:19connectors even help to convey what you
- 14:22are saying.
- 14:23For example, if I used "given that,"
- 14:25look, I'm going to make a
- 14:26cause-and-effect relationship here, but
- 14:28connectors are things you can easily
- 14:29bring ready-made, since they won't
- 14:31change.
- 14:32And this whole structure, you'll see
- 14:34that 90%, if not more of the essays with
- 14:37scores of 980 or 960, follow this
- 14:39structure I taught you.
- 14:41And now I want you to practice using
- 14:42repertoires that I'm going to teach you
- 14:43right now. Remember when I said, "Oh
- 14:45Sara, but I don't have a repertoire for
- 14:46anything." Pay attention here. I also
- 14:48think philosophers are very difficult to
- 14:49use without falling into that generic,
- 14:51memorized repertoire. In fact, I'm also
- 14:53not the person who knows a million
- 14:55studies, data, or books, or at least not
- 14:58by heart to the point of being able to
- 15:00put them in the essay. So, how do we do
- 15:03it? The strangest or coolest thing about
- 15:05the Enem is that you can use both
- 15:07Clarice Lispector and SpongeBob.
- 15:09And it's interesting that most of these
- 15:11cartoons we watched as children actually
- 15:14have social critiques.
- 15:16And the Enem theme, even though we fear
- 15:17what it might be, will be a social theme
- 15:19. I'll give you an example. Harry Potter
- 15:21. Take Dumbledore and think about what
- 15:23Dumbledore suffered for being older.
- 15:25Take Game of Thrones, take Lord of the
- 15:27Rings, take Grey's Anatomy, Breaking Bad
- 15:29, anyway, think about the series. Maybe
- 15:31you haven't watched the ones I'm talking
- 15:33about here, but I guarantee that if you
- 15:35don't live in a bubble and have never
- 15:36watched a movie or a series in your life
- 15:38, catch up on some series. Just kidding
- 15:40.
- 15:42I think the easiest way to make these
- 15:43references is by thinking about the
- 15:45movies you've watched recently, the
- 15:47series you've seen recently, the songs
- 15:48you like most, an old soap opera you
- 15:50watched, or some news about someone who
- 15:52was arrested.
- 15:54If you take that, I guarantee that no
- 15:55matter the Enem theme, you will be able
- 15:57to find something. Oh, Sara, but I
- 15:59memorized or want to memorize references
- 16:01, can I use them? The official answer
- 16:03would be: yes, you can. As long as you
- 16:05connect it really well to the theme, you
- 16:07can include any reference. That would be
- 16:09the pretty answer. But the raw, naked
- 16:12truth is that it's highly likely that if
- 16:14you use philosophers that everyone is
- 16:15using—not because everyone is using them
- 16:17, but because everyone memorized them
- 16:19because they speak to any theme—you'll
- 16:21fall into that generic repertoire and
- 16:23lose a lot of points. So now, since you
- 16:25already have the template ready, you
- 16:27just need to use your time to find those
- 16:29three references. Within each reference
- 16:31, find the argument that actually comes
- 16:33ready-made, because if there's any
- 16:35social critique in that movie, it's
- 16:37because it has a plot; and the main
- 16:39thing, whoever learned to do it the way
- 16:41I taught wants to spend most of their
- 16:43time finding the reference, because then
- 16:45everything else is ready; you'll even
- 16:47discover that it's much easier to do.
- 16:49Because when you include Thomas Hobbes,
- 16:50which is something you have no idea what
- 16:52it is, you can't connect it with your
- 16:53argument and then your entire essay
- 16:55falls apart. Is it scary to get to the
- 16:57test and have to think on the spot? It
- 16:58is, but it's the only thing you'll
- 17:00really need to think about on the spot,
- 17:02because everything else you've already
- 17:03learned here with me. Let's get to
- 17:05practice. I'll leave five topics down
- 17:06below for you to practice, which are
- 17:08themes that really look like the Enem
- 17:09exam. And if you liked the video, don't
- 17:11forget to comment, as I'll be very happy
- 17:13to know that I saved you, even at the
- 17:14very last minute. And to take my
- 17:16complete course with all subjects,
- 17:17including essay writing, which is
- 17:18focused on active study, especially for
- 17:20those who want very high scores on the
- 17:22Enem, like for medicine or highly
- 17:23competitive programs, it's also in the
- 17:25link in the description, it's called
- 17:26Hospital Questiona. So, big kiss to you
- 17:28all, see you in the next video. Bye-a.
- 17:30Bye.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Vou SALVAR sua REDAÇÃO do ENEM 2026 🙏 by Método Questiona, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,649 words across 554 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.