Vídeo clase unidad 4 Estructura de mercado (Economía) — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:01Hello, how are you? I would like to
- 0:03extend a warm welcome to our fourth
- 0:05unit titled Market Structure, as part
- 0:06of our economics course for the second
- 0:08semester of Industrial Engineering at
- 0:10the National Technological Institute of
- 0:12Mexico. What topics will we cover in
- 0:17this brief lecture? They are as follows
- 0:21: perfect competition versus imperfect
- 0:23competition, monopoly, oligopoly,
- 0:26cartels or trusts, and holding
- 0:28companies. These are the topics I will
- 0:31be discussing and commenting on for you
- 0:33in this video lecture. My name is
- 0:35Brandon Vázquez Valencia, and without
- 0:38further ado, let's begin. Competition,
- 0:44corporate competition, is what drives
- 0:47capital flows in economic terms. In our
- 0:52previous session, in unit three, we
- 0:55spoke briefly about the production
- 0:57function, which is performed by
- 1:00companies, and we made it clear that
- 1:02these companies must make a profit.
- 1:07Well, since there are many companies
- 1:09participating in the markets, this
- 1:10creates two competitive situations.
- 1:13Perfect competition on one hand, and
- 1:16imperfect competition on the other.
- 1:20Regarding perfect competition, the
- 1:22characteristics of firms in this
- 1:24situation are as follows. The first
- 1:28characteristic of perfect competition
- 1:30is that the firms participating in the
- 1:32market structure cannot influence
- 1:34prices. These are firms that, in any
- 1:38case, simply await how these prices
- 1:41fluctuate within the markets. As a
- 1:45second characteristic, firms in perfect
- 1:47competition are numerous. Yes, there
- 1:50can be many. Each one sells a small
- 1:52fraction of the market total. Each of
- 1:56them can carry out their commercial
- 1:58activities without any issues in
- 2:00perfect competition. The products
- 2:03offered to consumers are therefore
- 2:05identical, meaning they are homogeneous
- 2:06. There is no differentiation between
- 2:11one and the other, since here
- 2:13competition is, as we insist again, a
- 2:16mechanism where all participants are on
- 2:18equal footing. Therefore, the next
- 2:22characteristic is that there are no
- 2:24barriers to entry, meaning any company
- 2:26can enter or exit these markets. And
- 2:30this leads us to the particular way
- 2:33information is handled among the
- 2:35participating firms. Information
- 2:38therefore flows freely to all
- 2:40participants. All of them know what
- 2:43products are being sold and the prices
- 2:46currently occurring in a given market
- 2:48at that moment. Well, this situation
- 2:52forces companies to seek the most
- 2:54effective mechanisms to keep their
- 2:56costs as low as possible. Therefore,
- 3:00firms in perfect competition would
- 3:02reach a state of efficiency. And we
- 3:06highlight it here, this word that is
- 3:08key to being able to appreciate the
- 3:10characteristics of perfect competition
- 3:12or what we call firms in perfect
- 3:14competition. On the other hand, versus,
- 3:17we have imperfect competition. What is
- 3:20imperfect competition? Well, it is a
- 3:23phenomenon, let's say, in some way also
- 3:26natural, because consumers choose
- 3:28certain brands; with their preferences,
- 3:31they determine which brands are more
- 3:33important or solid within markets. And
- 3:38this, of course, unbalances what would
- 3:40be a perfect condition and turns it
- 3:41into an imperfect one. Here, companies
- 3:44take advantage of this situation to
- 3:46influence prices. You and I know that
- 3:49the more the price of Coca-Cola
- 3:50increases, we will continue consuming
- 3:52it if we are regular consumers of soft
- 3:54drinks. On the other hand, although
- 3:58there are fewer companies in this soft
- 4:01drink market, to take this analogy,
- 4:03only a few have the greatest capacity
- 4:05and market share. This word "monopolize
- 4:09" is key, because, ultimately,
- 4:10companies achieve that situation. And
- 4:13here we are talking about the fact that
- 4:15it is just a few that have the highest
- 4:17sales in the market. Companies seek to
- 4:21differentiate their products; that is,
- 4:24all those participating in this market,
- 4:26each of them offers the differentiator
- 4:29they can and have within reach, to
- 4:31generate higher sales, distinguish
- 4:33their product from the rest, and create
- 4:36competition that, while imperfect,
- 4:38helps them stand out or remain in that
- 4:41market. Michael Porter, a great
- 4:43strategist, says that there are
- 4:45barriers to entry and exit in markets.
- 4:48We can appreciate these barriers in
- 4:51terms of how they are influencing
- 4:53imperfect competition. The barriers I
- 4:56am mentioning are the following. Legal
- 4:58restrictions. On one hand, there are
- 5:01countries that generate benefits for
- 5:03some companies and countries that
- 5:05prohibit other companies from entering
- 5:07their markets due to protectionism,
- 5:09internal policies, etc., but it is
- 5:10already a barrier that limits or
- 5:12prevents free competition.
- 5:15Differentiation is another key element.
- 5:18For example, there are companies that
- 5:20boast a lot and specialize, excuse me,
- 5:23true specialization in their products
- 5:25that are ecologically notable compared
- 5:27to others that are not. This situation
- 5:32allows companies to generate, in
- 5:34addition to economies of scale, other
- 5:36types of segments that can serve or
- 5:38influence the lifestyle of consumers.
- 5:42For that reason, this is a barrier to
- 5:44entry or exit for these markets. And
- 5:47generally, high costs for those
- 5:48companies that are starting in the
- 5:50market are also a barrier. And Michael
- 5:54Porter, in a study on, uh, elements for
- 5:57generating market strategies, calls
- 5:59these, well, key points for developing
- 6:01competitive advantages, and we could
- 6:03also call them comparative advantages
- 6:05in the markets. Information is
- 6:09imperfect, the next and final
- 6:10characteristic of imperfect competition
- 6:13. Well, competitors are not all equally
- 6:17able to identify or know what products
- 6:20and prices are being handled in the
- 6:22market. This means that information
- 6:26does not flow freely, that there is
- 6:28control over the information. And
- 6:31remember that in business, information
- 6:33is power, and ultimately, whoever is
- 6:35better informed, or whoever gets the
- 6:37information through connections,
- 6:39through acquaintances in key government
- 6:41positions, because the information
- 6:43arrived first, or well, a series of
- 6:45factors, means that some are privileged
- 6:48or benefited. This then causes a
- 6:51phenomenon of inefficiency in the
- 6:53markets, which is therefore reflected
- 6:56in imperfect competition. An example of
- 6:59perfect competition, so we can
- 7:01appreciate it better, is what happens
- 7:03within the stock market. For example,
- 7:07the Mexican Stock Exchange issues
- 7:09newsletters where the investors
- 7:11themselves, all investors, have the
- 7:13same opportunities to obtain
- 7:15information and make decisions in that
- 7:18market. Which is not the case, well, in
- 7:22consumer markets generally, where
- 7:24brands are in constant struggle to
- 7:26generate their best or largest market
- 7:28share and engage in practices that
- 7:30prevent the market from having a
- 7:31perfect structure. That does not mean
- 7:35this is bad. However, imperfect
- 7:37competition could sometimes generate
- 7:40unfair practices among companies toward
- 7:42consumers. Moving on, we can see in
- 7:47this next slide, in this next
- 7:49illustration, what these market types
- 7:51are according to competition, how these
- 7:53market types are generated, or what
- 7:55characterizes them. First, we have the
- 7:59monopoly. A monopoly is mainly
- 8:02characterized by the fact that there is
- 8:05only a single seller, and this single
- 8:06seller corners the entire market. Here,
- 8:11consumers are waiting for this single
- 8:13seller to release their products,
- 8:15create strategies if they wish to, set
- 8:18prices, and determine distribution
- 8:20channels. That is to say, this single
- 8:24seller and sometimes sole producer is
- 8:26the one cornering the entire market,
- 8:28and therefore puts anyone else who
- 8:30might want to enter this market at a
- 8:32clear disadvantage. Why? Because they
- 8:35have already developed economies of
- 8:37scale, already developed savings, and
- 8:39already generated a learning curve in
- 8:40the market. While entrepreneurs or
- 8:44emerging startups might want to belong
- 8:46to or enter this market, the great
- 8:48barrier imposed by the monopoly
- 8:50ultimately keeps them out of
- 8:51competition. And here we have a clear
- 8:55example regarding software. For
- 8:58instance, Microsoft is the undisputed
- 9:00leader when it comes to monopolies of
- 9:02this nature. We have free software,
- 9:05such as Linux. However, the majority of
- 9:08applications, even those we are
- 9:10currently using on our systems, are
- 9:13based on some platform made by
- 9:15Microsoft. This makes it, then, the
- 9:18queen of monopolies. Yes, in Mexico we
- 9:21also have our own brand; for example,
- 9:23the well-known Telmex, which is a
- 9:25monopolistic company that, in many ways
- 9:28, has been an example of a monopolistic
- 9:30nature. And this doesn't mean that
- 9:34these companies are breaking the law;
- 9:36they simply have market preponderance
- 9:39or a natural consumer choice that makes
- 9:41them what we consider a natural
- 9:43monopoly by being the chosen ones, the
- 9:46favorites, or in a more serious context
- 9:48, when they are the only ones we find
- 9:50in those markets. The oligopoly
- 9:54phenomenon occurs when we have few
- 9:56sellers and many buyers, or the same
- 9:59number of buyers as in the previous
- 10:01situation, but here they only have a
- 10:03few sellers to choose from to decide
- 10:05which brand to consume. And so, the
- 10:10oligopoly situation makes us think that
- 10:12there could be two or three brands that
- 10:14have great dominance over an entire
- 10:16market, and these companies also have a
- 10:19very dramatic influence on prices; and
- 10:21the consumer, even though they have few
- 10:23options, is ultimately forced or
- 10:25compelled to consume what these
- 10:27predominant brands in the market are
- 10:29offering. Well, here we finally have
- 10:34monopsony, which is the opposite
- 10:37situation where we have too many
- 10:39sellers and only one style, one segment
- 10:42, one single stratum of demand or buyer
- 10:44. Here there can be a great selectivity
- 10:48of brands, but all of them are
- 10:50specialized in wanting or intending to
- 10:52satisfy a single segment. And in this
- 10:55segment, brands that are luxury are
- 10:58generally classified. We could think
- 11:01that even though there are several
- 11:03luxury brands, they are ultimately
- 11:05serving a single stratum, a single
- 11:07social class, a single lifestyle, a
- 11:09single style of consumption. For
- 11:12example, we could look at the
- 11:14automobile market. We have very
- 11:16powerful brands like Ferrari,
- 11:19Lamborghini, and so on. And all these
- 11:22brands try to satisfy the tastes, needs
- 11:25, or whims of a single segment, which
- 11:27is the one that buys luxury cars. And
- 11:31this would be the predominant demand
- 11:33factor. Here, the situation is then
- 11:35called the creation of a monopsony.
- 11:39Finally, in perfect competition we
- 11:41could find a situation of many sellers
- 11:44and many buyers, and this would mean
- 11:46there is an equilibrium, which does not
- 11:48happen in the previous aspects. You see
- 11:52, here perfect competition implies that
- 11:54there is indeed an equilibrium between
- 11:57supply and demand, an ideal market
- 11:58situation, which does not happen due to
- 12:01consumers 'natural selection of brands,
- 12:03their tastes, and preferences. Now we
- 12:08move on to three other important
- 12:10figures within market structures: the
- 12:11cartel, the trust, and the holding
- 12:13company. A company in a cartel
- 12:16situation is one that dominates the
- 12:19market geographically, even if it
- 12:21offers some product varieties.
- 12:23Ultimately, its strength lies in the
- 12:25infrastructure under which it
- 12:27distributes the product in geographical
- 12:29terms. This means it could involve an
- 12:33illegal or unfair practice. Finally,
- 12:37when you and I think of or hear the
- 12:39word cartel, we focus directly on
- 12:41illicit types of business. Well,
- 12:46ultimately, cartel-type markets are
- 12:48also important elements that influence
- 12:51and control prices and satisfy the
- 12:54demand for their products. And well,
- 12:58there is also a supply, and from there
- 13:01come some associations and some aspects
- 13:03of these types of businesses handled in
- 13:05the economy. The other ones are trusts.
- 13:09Trusts are considered a type of
- 13:11business formed by a merger. When
- 13:15several strategic business units are no
- 13:17longer functioning, or some of them,
- 13:19due to top management decisions, have
- 13:21to focus on specialized markets, a
- 13:23merger phenomenon is generated. So it
- 13:27is the union of several companies, and
- 13:29this union of companies tends to
- 13:30constitute what we call a monopoly.
- 13:33What do they achieve with this? Well,
- 13:35increasing their profits, reducing
- 13:37supply—that is, having fewer market
- 13:39entrants, fewer competitors, a better
- 13:41technical structure, and the lowest
- 13:43possible costs. At some point, Nokia
- 13:48had to resort to practically merging or
- 13:51selling itself to what was Microsoft
- 13:54and generate a new segment or serve a
- 13:57new market there. And well, finally we
- 14:03have the holding company as a society
- 14:05based on the control of the portfolios
- 14:07of some companies in order to even make
- 14:10strategic decisions. Banks, for example
- 14:14, HSBC, have a holding structure
- 14:16because there is great portfolio
- 14:18control, and this also gives them a
- 14:20powerful market position. Multinational
- 14:24corporations. When we hear the concept
- 14:27of a multinational company, we should
- 14:30think of those with significant
- 14:32economic power, but which also have a
- 14:35predominant geographical presence in
- 14:38other countries. For example, the
- 14:42Mexican company Bimbo, which has a
- 14:44major presence in Europe, especially in
- 14:47the Iberian Peninsula and mainly in
- 14:49Portugal; now with its association with
- 14:51Pan Rico, Bimbo has managed to
- 14:53transcend, as has La Costeña. These
- 14:57are Mexican companies of great
- 14:59prominence and world class that we can
- 15:01consider multinationals, or with that
- 15:03particular characteristic of being
- 15:05multinationals—that is, companies
- 15:07that have crossed borders and managed
- 15:09to conquer or dominate other
- 15:10territories with their excellence and
- 15:12world-class status. Now we move on to
- 15:18look at this slide, where perfect
- 15:19competition can be seen from the supply
- 15:21side. We are talking about supply and
- 15:24demand as well, as part of the market
- 15:26structure. From the supply perspective,
- 15:31imperfect competition appears in three
- 15:33forms so we can wrap up our topic.
- 15:37First is the monopoly. We already said
- 15:41there is one company or brand that
- 15:43becomes the only one, the predominant
- 15:45one, the one that calls the shots in
- 15:47the market or the one that specializes
- 15:49in the market and, therefore, the one
- 15:51that has made large investments, but it
- 15:53is the one that controls prices
- 15:54entirely. When there is a duopoly, we
- 15:58have the particularity that two
- 16:00companies dominate that market. In soft
- 16:04drinks, we have the eternal example of
- 16:06Coca-Cola and Pepsi. And well, we would
- 16:09also have, for example, Sky and Dish as
- 16:12other examples of companies in a
- 16:13duopoly situation. And an oligopoly is
- 16:18constituted by those companies that,
- 16:20although there are several, generally,
- 16:23there are not many. What do we call "
- 16:26many"? Well, many would be when every
- 16:29consumer could have between 10 or 20
- 16:31brand options, or many brands to which
- 16:34they could migrate without any problem.
- 16:37But when that is not the case, then we
- 16:40have an oligopolistic situation. Few
- 16:43companies, so the consumer does not
- 16:45have great options, does not have great
- 16:47opportunities to choose, and therefore,
- 16:49these are the ones that dominate the
- 16:51market. On the demand side, when things
- 16:56change—that is, when the consumer
- 16:58calls the shots and determines which is
- 17:01their favorite brand—the following
- 17:03natural situations arise. Monopsony and
- 17:07oligopsony. A monopsony is a single
- 17:10buyer and there are so many brands that
- 17:13want to satisfy their needs. It is a
- 17:15unique stratum. These are strata of
- 17:18great economic power, which specialized
- 17:21brands also want to satisfy, but it
- 17:23turns out to be the natural choice of
- 17:26one brand over all those others. And
- 17:29here we generally find luxury goods or
- 17:31items. An oligopsony is a club of
- 17:36buyers, a few very selective buyers,
- 17:39and this also causes the buyer to be
- 17:42the one who determines how prices
- 17:44should behave in that market and which
- 17:47brands will have preference or
- 17:49dominance in the market in question.
- 17:55With these two approaches, we conclude
- 17:57our topic on what market structure is.
- 18:00We have analyzed a monopoly situation
- 18:02and an oligopoly situation. What
- 18:05characteristics does perfect
- 18:07competition provide for it to happen,
- 18:09and how does imperfect competition
- 18:10present itself? In addition to some
- 18:13systems of well, of special markets
- 18:18such as the trust, the cartel, the
- 18:21holding, and multinationals. For you
- 18:25and me to learn more about this, here
- 18:27are some references, for example,
- 18:28Economipedia, which you can consult
- 18:30online, and Econosublime for more
- 18:32information regarding market structures
- 18:34. Thank you very much for your
- 18:37attention, and we will see each other
- 18:39in our next topic and the last unit of
- 18:40our course.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Vídeo clase unidad 4 Estructura de mercado (Economía) by Brandon Foster, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,584 words across 432 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.