TRUMP ATOM BOMBASI ATACAK? İRAN VURULABİLİR — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Nacar International Transport presents
- 0:02the news analysis program with Tolga
- 0:04Turan.
- 0:05>> US journalist Tucker Carlson has claimed
- 0:07that the US could launch a nuclear
- 0:09strike on Iran within a few days under
- 0:11pressure from Israeli Prime Minister
- 0:12Netanyahu.
- 0:13What are your thoughts on this?
- 0:15>> It is significant that a figure close to
- 0:16intelligence circles, like Tucker
- 0:18Carlson, is putting forward this claim.
- 0:19I believe there is a rift among the
- 0:21decision-makers in Washington here. This
- 0:24is a case of a controlled leak.
- 0:26>> Could this have something to do with the
- 0:28midterm elections happening tomorrow in
- 0:30America?
- 0:31>> Yes, it is related to that. The
- 0:33continuation of the Iran War has created
- 0:34a very serious backlash within US public
- 0:36opinion. Why? Because oil prices have
- 0:38increased by 50 percent.
- 0:41The fact that the United States cannot
- 0:42maintain clear control in the Strait of
- 0:44Hormuz is pushing the Gulf countries,
- 0:46which are on the side of the US, to seek
- 0:48other alliances, and it slowly shows us
- 0:50that the United States 'power in the
- 0:51Middle East is melting away.
- 0:53Because, for example, the Americans
- 0:55tried to land on an island in the Strait
- 0:56of Hormuz. What happened? They ran away
- 0:58as fast as they could. Iran responded
- 0:59very harshly there, and Trump has these
- 1:01elections coming up now. I mean, his
- 1:02approval rating in public opinion has
- 1:03dropped significantly. It is at the 31
- 1:05percent level. Accordingly, he aims to
- 1:07get through these midterm elections as
- 1:09soon as possible and then go after Iran
- 1:11. That is why he is waiting for the
- 1:12midterm elections. Actually, to tell the
- 1:14truth, the American public does not want
- 1:15this war with Iran.
- 1:16>> Do you think the result from the ballot
- 1:18box will really affect the war with Iran
- 1:20? Because it is known that neither party
- 1:22has any discomfort regarding the use of
- 1:23nuclear weapons.
- 1:24>> Political decisions made in the US are
- 1:26directly related to the decisions made
- 1:28by the voters at home, and in fact, the
- 1:30American public ended the Vietnam War to
- 1:32some extent. When we look back at the
- 1:34past, one of the reasons for America's
- 1:35withdrawal from Afghanistan was the
- 1:37pressure of American public opinion.
- 1:38Triggering this war before the election
- 1:40, that is, if a nuclear weapon is to be
- 1:42used, doing so right before the election
- 1:44, what will it do with a global shock?
- 1:46It will directly reflect back on
- 1:48gasoline prices, and perhaps for the
- 1:49first time in history in the United
- 1:51States, gas prices will skyrocket to the
- 1:53100 or even 200 percent band. Because,
- 1:54son, it is not easy; you are talking
- 1:56about dropping a nuclear bomb on this
- 1:57country. We are not talking about
- 1:58carrying out a military operation or
- 1:59something. Accordingly, it makes more
- 2:01sense to do this after the election
- 2:02rather than before. Because, you know,
- 2:04after the election, a "lame duck"
- 2:06situation begins anyway. The polls are
- 2:07closed. This way, the public's reaction
- 2:10is delayed for a while. That is why
- 2:12Trump thinks, let's get the elections
- 2:13over with, and whatever we are going to
- 2:14do, let's do it after the elections.
- 2:16Because if we do it before the elections
- 2:17, we will face the bill for it during
- 2:19the elections. But what happens if we do
- 2:21it after the elections?
- 2:22He may be thinking there won't be an
- 2:24election left to face.
- 2:25>> The tunnels in the Yaralar Kazma
- 2:27Mountains, south of Iran's Natanz region
- 2:29, are being discussed. The possibility
- 2:30of a nuclear strike on this location is
- 2:32also on the table. What is known about
- 2:33the technical and military structure of
- 2:35this complex? What is being said about
- 2:36what is inside these tunnels?
- 2:37>> As far as I know, the deepest
- 2:39bunker-busting bomb the United States
- 2:41has is about 40 meters. So even if you
- 2:42drop a thermobaric bomb or something
- 2:44there, it's no use, man. It is 60 meters
- 2:45underground. There is a bunker there
- 2:47belonging to Iran, but this bunker isn't
- 2:49really that interesting for Iran.
- 2:51Because Iran consists of a very
- 2:52mountainous geography, they actually
- 2:53have many such underground facilities,
- 2:55which they were already constantly
- 2:56showing on their Twitter accounts and
- 2:58such.
- 2:59They were filming things, entering those
- 3:01bunkers, and showing footage from them,
- 3:02saying, "We are coming, we will take
- 3:04revenge," and so on. However, the United
- 3:06States is specifically pointing to this
- 3:08bunker as a target. What happened in the
- 3:09previous attack? The facility where Iran
- 3:12conducts uranium enrichment activities
- 3:14was hit.
- 3:14>> By the way, Israel's claim for this
- 3:16facility is also that they are
- 3:18conducting uranium enrichment there.
- 3:20>> Exactly. Because the perimeter of the
- 3:22facility has been fortified with
- 3:23concrete walls. It is said from
- 3:25satellite imagery that there is very
- 3:27intense activity and so on. Based on
- 3:28this, they say, "We will strike this
- 3:29place." With what will they strike it?
- 3:31With a nuclear bomb. Why will they
- 3:33strike it with a tactical nuclear bomb?
- 3:34Because it is 60 meters underground, and
- 3:36the United States says they can only
- 3:37reach 40 meters with conventional
- 3:39weapons. But will a tactical nuclear
- 3:41bomb really be able to reach 60 meters?
- 3:43I mean, I don't know that either. I am
- 3:44not sure about that. I mean, I don't
- 3:46even know what kind of bomb they will
- 3:47use. What is the class of that tactical
- 3:49nuclear bomb? Nobody knows, but they are
- 3:51using this as the reason.
- 3:52>> Well, do you think the US wouldn't
- 3:54consider a ground operation before
- 3:55resorting to nuclear? Now, Iran is not a
- 3:57place like Iraq, nor is it like
- 3:58Afghanistan. Yes, okay, it has a
- 4:00mountainous geography like Afghanistan,
- 4:01but Iran has a very serious ground army
- 4:03. So, instead of encountering militia
- 4:05forces like the Taliban, you would face
- 4:07a proper regular army in that
- 4:09mountainous terrain. If you carry out a
- 4:10ground operation there. That's one.
- 4:12Secondly, what did the United States
- 4:14actually do in Iraq? Before going after
- 4:16Saddam, they had already dismantled the
- 4:18political structure by using the
- 4:20Kasnazani order or by buying off
- 4:21Saddam's generals. But they couldn't do
- 4:23this in Iran. They killed the leader,
- 4:25right? They killed Soleimani. Did it
- 4:26work? Still didn't work. Or they were
- 4:28expecting something like, just as in
- 4:30Russia, there would be an uprising
- 4:32within Iran. A civil riot would break
- 4:33out. The regime would be overthrown. We
- 4:35imposed sanctions. We attacked
- 4:36repeatedly. Did it work? Still didn't
- 4:38work. When that didn't work, this time
- 4:40they said, just like they used the PKK
- 4:41in Turkey and Syria. We will use PJAK
- 4:43there too. In this way, we will stir up
- 4:45the inside of the country. Iran took
- 4:46precautions early and bombed PJAK. The
- 4:48Iranian regime devastated PJAK. That
- 4:50didn't work either. In the end, it seems
- 4:52they have come to the nuclear bomb
- 4:54option. Which means Netanyahu also has a
- 4:56share in this. We will come to that too
- 4:58. We need to talk about that as well.
- 4:59This is not just Trump's thing. I mean
- 5:01>> that was one of the questions too. Is
- 5:03Netanyahu a party to this war, or is he
- 5:05the instigator? We need to read that
- 5:07situation correctly.
- 5:08>> Both, they are both a party and an
- 5:10instigator.
- 5:11>> In fact, it is thought that he is
- 5:13putting more intense pressure on Trump
- 5:14during this period. It is said that he
- 5:16is even angry.
- 5:17>> According to American journalists, he
- 5:18calls every day. Asking when are you
- 5:20going to drop it, when are you going to
- 5:21drop it. It’s like a joke, seriously.
- 5:22Look, imagine it’s 2026, one head of
- 5:24state calls another. "So, are you
- 5:26dropping the nuke?""Are you dropping it
- 5:27, man, are you dropping the nuke?" and
- 5:29keeps pestering the American president.
- 5:30"That's so weird, man, okay, we'll drop
- 5:32it." Did a situation like "to hell with
- 5:34the nuclear bomb" actually happen, I
- 5:36wonder? If such a situation occurred, I
- 5:38would have wanted to be a fly on the
- 5:39wall. I mean, it's both terrifying and
- 5:41ironic.
- 5:41>> I would have loved to witness that.
- 5:43>> By the way, Netanyahu is also in
- 5:44political trouble, and in fact,
- 5:45Netanyahu could even be considered a
- 5:47sort of coup plotter. There was Yitzhak
- 5:48Rabin, who advocated for softening the
- 5:50stance against the Intifada. The Israeli
- 5:51Prime Minister played a role in his
- 5:53killing, in his assassination—I
- 5:55explained these assassinations in my "
- 5:57Why Did the Arabs Lose" video. It’s on
- 5:59the main channel; you can watch that
- 6:00video. He's in trouble right now, and if
- 6:02he falls from power, the guy will be put
- 6:03on trial; there’s also a corruption
- 6:05investigation against him. He couldn't
- 6:06secure a majority
- 6:07>> at the moment. Yes. They couldn't form a
- 6:09government yet either.
- 6:10>> That’s why the war continues; there’s
- 6:11nothing else to be done. He has no other
- 6:12option left when it comes to domestic
- 6:14politics. Another issue is this. I mean
- 6:16, is there really a uranium enrichment
- 6:18facility inside the mountains? I mean,
- 6:20is there any proof of this? Definitive,
- 6:21clear proof. I haven't seen it. Maybe it
- 6:23doesn't exist. Maybe it does. I don’t
- 6:25want this to turn into that other thing
- 6:25. That’s what I’m afraid of. They said
- 6:27Saddam had weapons of mass destruction,
- 6:28right? Colin Powell came out and spoke
- 6:30like that. Nice, nice, but Saddam didn't
- 6:32have any such thing. Subsequently, that
- 6:34came to light. They were saying Saddam
- 6:36had nuclear weapons and such. Turns out
- 6:38he didn't.
- 6:38>> They state that international inspectors
- 6:40cannot enter the region they mention.
- 6:42They also state that no imaging can be
- 6:44done regarding that place.
- 6:46Well, this is of course based on a
- 6:47prediction, but it is also observed that
- 6:49there is a lot of activity in the region
- 6:50.
- 6:51>> It could be an important military base.
- 6:53Sure, fair enough. But all these things
- 6:54mentioned are not definitive proof of
- 6:56uranium enrichment activity. I mean, we
- 6:58can't know that.
- 6:59>> So, how did the return of the atomic
- 7:01bomb to the agenda, 80 years after World
- 7:03War II, resonate in the world? When we
- 7:05look at it, this is actually a global
- 7:07security issue. How do world states
- 7:09approach this?
- 7:10>> People are constantly in this "alright"
- 7:11mode, you know? They will never drop it
- 7:13. Now there is the issue of the balance
- 7:14of terror left over from the Cold War.
- 7:16They argue that this is still valid. But
- 7:19friends, we are now in a multipolar
- 7:20world, and leaders and states will not
- 7:22necessarily act rationally until the
- 7:24very end. If a state faces an
- 7:26existential threat, it will use that
- 7:27weapon.
- 7:28I mean, furthermore, there is also this
- 7:30. Now, when we look at Russia and
- 7:32Ukraine, Russia got stuck in the
- 7:34Russia-Ukraine war. Look, they were
- 7:35expecting the same thing again. What
- 7:36were they saying when the Russia-Ukraine
- 7:38war first broke out? "There will be an
- 7:39internal uprising.""They will overthrow
- 7:41Putin," and so on. Nothing like that
- 7:42happened. "We will impose embargoes.""
- 7:44Russia will break economically." No, it
- 7:46didn't break. In fact, for a time,
- 7:47Europe was getting pumped up. "Should we
- 7:48join in, too?""Should we send volunteers
- 7:50besides military aid?" Should we also
- 7:51fight against the Russians? Dictator
- 7:53Putin. What did Putin stand up and say?
- 7:55He said we know we cannot defeat NATO
- 7:56conventionally. I mean, we can't defeat
- 7:58NATO, that's true. But he said, we don't
- 7:59have any need for a world where Russia
- 8:00doesn't exist either. I even debated
- 8:02this with journalists on Twitter Spaces
- 8:04back then. They were talking like this.
- 8:05Putin is an enemy of humanity, a clown,
- 8:07a guy who shouldn't be taken seriously.
- 8:09A dirty dictator, blah, blah, blah. Guys
- 8:10, I said, you say that, but the man has
- 8:12over 4,000 nuclear warheads. I mean, I
- 8:13take this man seriously. I take this
- 8:15statement of his seriously as well.
- 8:16Subsequently, Putin said this. What
- 8:17happened? They immediately took a step
- 8:19back. At least, there was a step back
- 8:21regarding sending volunteer soldiers and
- 8:22such. Now, you move to the other side.
- 8:24China is locked in like an animal. It is
- 8:26surrounded, and you are going to prepare
- 8:27a video about this anyway. You'll
- 8:29prepare a video about China's naval
- 8:30power specifically, but guys, by the way
- 8:31, why aren't you watching Fatma? It's
- 8:33shameful, isn't it? You keep writing in
- 8:35the comments. Where is Tog? I'm right
- 8:37here, but buddies, I can't be cloned. I
- 8:38can't be in every video; besides,
- 8:40Fatma's writing, journalism, and
- 8:42storytelling are quite good. You are
- 8:44aware of this, but I guess there's some
- 8:45annoyance because I'm not there. She is
- 8:47also a part of our team. Please watch
- 8:49her too and don't write such things.
- 8:51It's very shameful, man. I'll say that
- 8:52in advance. Let me continue.
- 8:54>> I was actually going to get to this. Now
- 8:55, if we expect a counter-move from China
- 8:57or Russia following a nuclear bomb
- 8:59dropped on Iran, does this imply
- 9:01something?
- 9:02Actually, can we say that World War III
- 9:04is now inevitably at our doorstep? Well
- 9:06, I think that's the case. I think the
- 9:08probability is very high. And I had made
- 9:10a video on this subject from Osman
- 9:11Pamukoğlu's book. Because there is also
- 9:13a situation like this. People always
- 9:14look at Russia and China as an alliance
- 9:15, but they aren't. Part of the Russian
- 9:17army is also on the Chinese border, and
- 9:18this hostility is historical; even when
- 9:20the Soviet Union existed, the Soviets
- 9:22and China had already confronted each
- 9:23other in the 60s and 70s. They even had
- 9:25small border skirmishes after a certain
- 9:27point. Trump's plan to reconcile with
- 9:29China by pressuring Zelensky there
- 9:30didn't work. Well, it didn't happen, or
- 9:32rather, it seems it hasn't happened. I
- 9:33don't know what will happen in the
- 9:34future. Things are going to get messy,
- 9:35too. Now, there is also this. As a great
- 9:37power, because the United States is no
- 9:39longer the sole superpower. If you stand
- 9:40up and try to solve the Iran problem in
- 9:42foreign policy—even if tactically—
- 9:43because you're stuck there. I mean, if
- 9:45you try to solve a problem you're stuck
- 9:46in with nuclear weapons, then Russia
- 9:48will say, "Then I'll try to solve the
- 9:49Ukraine problem with nuclear weapons,
- 9:51even if just tactically." China would
- 9:53say the same thing for Taiwan. So this
- 9:54encourages China and Russia regarding
- 9:56the use of nuclear weapons.
- 9:59It could even embolden Pakistan against
- 10:00India, and it's obvious that America is
- 10:02losing power; what did the Gulf
- 10:04countries do? They formed an alternative
- 10:06defense pact with Turkey through the
- 10:08Mecca agreement and so on. In that power
- 10:11vacuum, anyone can do anything. Because
- 10:13we are entering an era in international
- 10:15relations where everyone is more or less
- 10:17on their own. We are entering a more
- 10:18realist period now, aren't we? I mean,
- 10:20the constructivist era in international
- 10:22relations is over.
- 10:23>> So, turning to Iran, how much would our
- 10:25country be affected by a nuclear attack
- 10:27on Türkiye's neighbor?
- 10:29Because we are not talking about a very
- 10:31long distance as the crow flies.
- 10:32>> I can say this. How was the Black Sea
- 10:34affected when Chernobyl happened?
- 10:35Multiply that by three. Why multiply by
- 10:37three? A nuclear bomb is being dropped
- 10:38directly. Just on the other side of
- 10:40Türkiye's border. And of course, its
- 10:42effects will reach us via wind and rain
- 10:44. I mean, this is not that difficult to
- 10:45grasp. I also want to say this. We are
- 10:47facing a much bigger danger long before
- 10:50that. And that is the refugees. Imagine
- 10:52an army of Iranian refugees reaching the
- 10:55Turkish border. There is even a danger
- 10:57for Azerbaijan right before this. I mean
- 10:58, an army of refugees will flock there
- 11:00too.
- 11:01>> There is also such a dilemma there. At
- 11:02this point, Türkiye is both a NATO
- 11:04country and a neighbor to Iran. So it is
- 11:07squeezed from both sides. Well, what
- 11:09position will Türkiye be in at this
- 11:11point?
- 11:11>> As a NATO member country, it has to
- 11:13stack all its air defense systems on the
- 11:15border. It has to pile up whatever it
- 11:17has on the border.
- 11:18Besides, in such a situation, the
- 11:20chatter from human rights defenders
- 11:21about "let immigrants come, they are
- 11:23humans too" will collapse. Because there
- 11:25is a nuclear bomb dropped in the middle
- 11:27of it all. Are you guys crazy? I mean,
- 11:29that means losing control of your border
- 11:30there. It means Iran infiltrating and
- 11:32starting rear-guard terrorist activities
- 11:35inside your country. When that nuclear
- 11:36bomb is dropped, things will go
- 11:38completely haywire. Like in Hearts of
- 11:40Iron 4—which, by the way, I don't play,
- 11:41I'm boycotting Paradox games. Anyway, we
- 11:43put that aside. Ever since that
- 11:45unfortunate incident where they talked
- 11:46nonsense about Atatürk. The world's
- 11:48tension was rising like this. This one
- 11:50declares war on that one. That one
- 11:51declares war on this one. Exactly like
- 11:52that. So, because the world's tension
- 11:54will skyrocket at once, you have no
- 11:55chance of losing control of that border
- 11:57, especially your eastern border. And
- 11:59you are already dealing with the PKK on
- 12:00your southern border. Türkiye needs to
- 12:01immediately fill its entire eastern
- 12:03border with reinforcements in such a
- 12:04situation.
- 12:06>> Since last October, many governments
- 12:08around the world have launched campaigns
- 12:10to prepare citizens for a nuclear threat
- 12:13or a natural disaster.
- 12:15In fact, we prepared a documentary about
- 12:17this recently.
- 12:18At this point, as citizens, if such a
- 12:20possibility occurs or if it's certain
- 12:22that a nuclear strike is coming.
- 12:24What can we do as citizens?
- 12:27>> I am definitely not a survival expert.
- 12:28But according to what is said, stock up
- 12:30on plenty of food. Return to analog
- 12:31systems. Have a radio. At the very least
- 12:34, if you don't have a radio, have
- 12:35walkie-talkies so that family members
- 12:37can communicate easily with each other.
- 12:38By the way, even though I'm not a civil
- 12:40engineer, I know this much. You know,
- 12:42there is a law according to building
- 12:43inspection rules that states it's
- 12:45mandatory to build a shelter after a
- 12:46certain number of apartments, right?
- 12:47Friends, to what extent would a shelter
- 12:49you build under a structural
- 12:50architectural design be effective? Did
- 12:52you get hit by a nuke? Okay? The
- 12:54structural architecture collapses
- 12:55downwards. When the building collapses
- 12:56on top of the shelter, aren't you
- 12:58essentially putting yourself in a coffin
- 13:00? There is also such a situation. When
- 13:02we looked at the assembly areas, it came
- 13:03to light when the earthquake happened.
- 13:05Pretty much all the assembly areas had
- 13:06either become buildings or something
- 13:08else. In the '99 earthquake, there were
- 13:10containers placed there for disasters.
- 13:12Defense officials were supposed to go,
- 13:14open them, and distribute supplies to
- 13:16the public. The insides of those
- 13:18containers had long been emptied, sold,
- 13:20or lost. I mean, it's not clear where
- 13:22they went. If they updated them, then
- 13:23good. I don't know the current situation
- 13:25, but there were news reports that new
- 13:27shelters were being built in Turkey.
- 13:29However, I still don't think Turkey is
- 13:30sufficiently prepared for a nuclear war
- 13:32, at least in the civilian sector.
- 13:34Let me also say something about Europe.
- 13:36You had already prepared a video on this
- 13:38, Fatma. Now look, friends, such major
- 13:40wars occur on the eve of major changes.
- 13:42Meaning the world is moving toward a
- 13:43change. Certain problems cannot be
- 13:45solved. There are certain disagreements
- 13:47. There are certain deadlock points. In
- 13:49international relations, you reach a
- 13:51point of war.
- 13:52>> Like this Russia-Ukraine deadlock you
- 13:54just mentioned, Iran, America, India,
- 13:56Pakistan, China, Taiwan. Are you talking
- 13:58about these?
- 13:58>> I am talking about these. I mean, the
- 14:00World War didn't break out just because
- 14:02some Serbian guy shot some wretched
- 14:03archduke. I mean, there was a tension
- 14:05that had accumulated behind that. There
- 14:07were accumulated, unresolved issues. The
- 14:09situation of the Serbs within
- 14:10Austria-Hungary, the Hungarians wanting
- 14:12to secede, Metternich tried so hard,
- 14:14Maria Theresa tried so hard, it didn't
- 14:17work, and so on. I mean, this problem
- 14:18had already come to a head there. When
- 14:20you look at Germany, Germany had
- 14:22surpassed England in industry but
- 14:23couldn't reach colonies. England and
- 14:25France were popping up in front of them
- 14:27everywhere. On the other side, there is
- 14:28an Ottoman problem in the south. The
- 14:30Russians and the British had agreed
- 14:32among themselves to partition the
- 14:33Ottomans. But in reaction to this, the
- 14:35Ottomans went and leaned toward Germany
- 14:37. And might I add, there was a boiling
- 14:39cauldron inside Russia. The Romanovs
- 14:41were not even aware of this yet. When we
- 14:42look at today's situation, we see this
- 14:44type of power deadlock that states have
- 14:45imposed on each other. And in addition
- 14:47to this, Europe is currently boiling
- 14:48just like Russia was in that period.
- 14:50Actually, no one is aware of this. In
- 14:51fact, I think we should make a video
- 14:53about this.
- 14:55Like, has uncontrolled migration, all
- 14:57these immigrants, become Europe's
- 14:58nightmare?
- 15:00Because in a potential nuclear war or a
- 15:02total war right now, the place Europe
- 15:04needs to deal with most is behind the
- 15:06front lines. Man, you can't even go into
- 15:07your own bathroom as a Frenchman, right
- 15:09? You can't control your own suburbs.
- 15:11The guys have practically set up some
- 15:12kind of rebel state there. They do
- 15:14whatever they want. And you talk about
- 15:16standing up to Russia in foreign policy
- 15:18. You haven't even handled your own
- 15:19internal affairs. So, there is also this
- 15:21situation in Europe. Let's see what
- 15:22happens with this. I am very curious,
- 15:24but if it happens, the trouble is huge.
- 15:26I think it would start a chain reaction
- 15:29.
- 15:29>> While we're on the subject of nukes,
- 15:31what is the difference between a
- 15:32tactical nuke and a strategic nuke?
- 15:34>> The difference is as follows. What is a
- 15:36strategic nuke? For example, a hydrogen
- 15:38bomb. Alright? Like the Tsar bomb. Of
- 15:40course, I don't know what they’ve built
- 15:41since the Tsar bomb. I mean, the last
- 15:42thing they made was the Tsar bomb. They
- 15:44tested it, they detonated it. The
- 15:45shockwaves circled the globe three times
- 15:47or something. I mean, it was a totally
- 15:48insane weapon. Even the Russians
- 15:50themselves were terrified of what they
- 15:51had detonated. In fact, after the Cold
- 15:53War ended, it came out that, well, this
- 15:55is a strategic bomb, okay? You launch
- 15:56one and half of France is gone. That’s a
- 15:58strategic bomb. Then there is the
- 16:00tactical nuclear bomb. It’s a surgical
- 16:01strike targeting a small area, but it
- 16:03still creates nuclear fallout. Its
- 16:05purpose is to destroy a specific region
- 16:07.
- 16:07After the Cold War, it was revealed, for
- 16:10example, that the Russians had even
- 16:11targeted bridges in random villages in
- 16:13the Netherlands as potential transit
- 16:15points for tactical nukes.
- 16:17They had aimed to launch tactical
- 16:19nuclear bombs. That was the level of
- 16:20nuclear buildup between the two sides.
- 16:22When these things came to light back
- 16:24then, the world was horrified. Like, "
- 16:26Wow, what have we just stepped back from
- 16:27?" To explain this more scientifically,
- 16:29tactical nuclear weapons range in power
- 16:32from 0.1 kilotons to 50 kilotons. For
- 16:34reference, the atomic bomb dropped on
- 16:36Hiroshima in 1945 was 15 kilotons. So,
- 16:38it actually falls into the tactical
- 16:40nuclear bomb class now. Think of it that
- 16:41way. In strategic nuclear warheads, we
- 16:43are no longer talking about kilotons,
- 16:45but megatons. And like, you launch one
- 16:46and a metropolis is gone; you launch
- 16:48another and half a country is gone—the
- 16:49film*Threads*does a tremendous job
- 16:51portraying this. I mean, the film shows
- 16:52the event very realistically. Everyone
- 16:54dies, basically. There’s no heroism or
- 16:55anything like that in the film.
- 16:57>> I even received some criticism regarding
- 16:58that film. Since we didn’t mention that
- 17:00the movie is very disturbing, viewers
- 17:02should prepare themselves
- 17:03psychologically before watching it.
- 17:05Because it really is a heavy film.
- 17:07>> In this context, the Russians have a
- 17:09system of their own. From the moment the
- 17:11other side launches, the Russians don’t
- 17:13need to do anything manually. The system
- 17:15automatically launches at pre-determined
- 17:17targets. There is also such a thing.
- 17:19I mean, perhaps until the 1980s, the
- 17:20first one to strike had a chance of
- 17:22winning a nuclear war, but that’s not
- 17:24the case now.
- 17:25Meaning, if you launch, the other side
- 17:26detects it and launches back. So, when a
- 17:28nuclear war begins, those who have seen
- 17:30*Threads*will remember. They don’t just
- 17:32launch one and stop. First, one is
- 17:34detonated high up to create an EMP
- 17:36effect. The entire electronic
- 17:38infrastructure of that country collapses
- 17:39.
- 17:41Then, if they want to destroy the whole
- 17:42country, or if they want to completely
- 17:44wipe out that section of the country and
- 17:46make it uninhabitable, strategic bombs
- 17:48follow, or they just launch a couple of
- 17:49tactical ones to break the defenses.
- 17:52One of my concerns is exactly this. They
- 17:54are going to launch that tactical bomb,
- 17:56but there is also a possibility of that
- 17:58tactical bomb creating an EMP effect.
- 17:59What kind of bomb is it? Are we going to
- 18:01be affected by that EMP situation as
- 18:02well? I mean, it's unclear. It's not
- 18:04clear what those people will launch. He
- 18:05might claim he'll use a tactical one. We
- 18:06might see him use a strategic one. And
- 18:08then, well, with Trump, you never know
- 18:10what he'll do.
- 18:10>> In that case, it depends on what the
- 18:12goal is. I mean, are you aiming for
- 18:15total destruction or is the goal to gain
- 18:17control in line with your own interests
- 18:20?
- 18:20>> Even if it's tactical, will it create
- 18:22nuclear fallout, and will that fallout
- 18:24reach us? It will reach us. I mean,
- 18:26>> won't it pollute the clean water sources
- 18:28of 50 million people,
- 18:29>> and won't it reach the Persian Gulf and
- 18:30the Strait of Hormuz? The nuclear
- 18:32fallout will reach there.
- 18:33Gulf countries, for instance the United
- 18:35Arab Emirates, get almost all their
- 18:37water by desalinating seawater. Won't
- 18:39all these people end up with cancer, my
- 18:40friend? Doesn't that mean you'd be
- 18:42hitting your own allies indirectly by
- 18:44making this move? Man, this is such a
- 18:46crazy situation. Look at what we're
- 18:47talking about in 2026. I mean, we're
- 18:49sitting here debating, will he use a
- 18:50tactical one? Will he use a strategic
- 18:51one? What will happen if he uses a
- 18:52tactical one? We're actually sitting
- 18:53here talking about this. It's like a
- 18:55joke.
- 18:55>> By the way, let me confess. I don't
- 18:57think they will use it.
- 18:58>> I mean, I don't think they will either.
- 19:00I'm choosing to think positively right
- 19:01now. I'm thinking positively for the
- 19:02sake of it being good, but could they
- 19:03use it? They could. They really could. I
- 19:05mean, we're talking about the United
- 19:07States, and could this start a chain
- 19:09reaction in terms of global foreign
- 19:11policy? Yes, it could start one.
- 19:13>> I have nothing else to ask. My questions
- 19:15were just that.
- 19:16>> We've come to the end of another news
- 19:17analysis video. Don't make those kinds
- 19:18of comments about Fatma. Don't make her
- 19:19angry, she's going to tell you how it is
- 19:20. She won't tell. Take care of
- 19:22yourselves. Stay fascist. Nacar
- 19:23International Shipping presented the
- 19:25news analysis program with Tolga Turan.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of TRUMP ATOM BOMBASI ATACAK? İRAN VURULABİLİR by Tolga Turan Gündem, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,565 words across 702 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.