YouTube2Text

This Vaccine Just Changed Cancer Forever — Transcript

by Dr Brad Stanfield · 2,307 words · 352 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00In the summer of 1890, a 17-year-old
  2. 0:02named Bessie Dashiell, she caught her
  3. 0:04hand between two train car seats, but
  4. 0:06the pain just wouldn't go away. And
  5. 0:08unfortunately, a biopsy found an
  6. 0:09aggressive bone cancer called a sarcoma.
  7. 0:12So, surgeons had to amputate her arm
  8. 0:13below the elbow, but it wasn't enough.
  9. 0:15The cancer had already spread, and in
  10. 0:17January 1891, Bessie died. Now, her
  11. 0:20surgeon was a young New Yorker named
  12. 0:22William Coley, and her death broke
  13. 0:24something in him. He spent weeks combing
  14. 0:26through the hospital's old records for
  15. 0:28anything that might have saved her. And
  16. 0:30what he found in those records branded
  17. 0:32him a fraud for the next 100 years. But
  18. 0:34last week, 135 years later, it helped to
  19. 0:37produce the first phase three win for a
  20. 0:39cancer vaccine that was personalized to
  21. 0:41each individual patient, and it caused
  22. 0:43the stock price of Moderna, who helped
  23. 0:45build this vaccine, soar by 177%
  24. 0:48in a single day. That's the largest
  25. 0:50single-day percentage gain in the S&P
  26. 0:52500's history this century. So, deep in
  27. 0:55those files, Coley found a case from
  28. 0:57seven years before. So, a person by the
  29. 1:00name of Fred Stein, he was a German
  30. 1:01immigrant at the time. He had a sarcoma
  31. 1:03of his neck that kept growing after
  32. 1:05every operation. Doctors called him
  33. 1:07hopeless, but then Stein caught a severe
  34. 1:10strep skin infection that tore through
  35. 1:12the hospital wards before antibiotics
  36. 1:13existed. Now, as the infection raged
  37. 1:16inside Stein's body, the tumor, it
  38. 1:18melted away. Coley had to know how that
  39. 1:20story ended, and he spent weeks knocking
  40. 1:23on doors through the tenements of the
  41. 1:24Lower East Side, and he found Stein
  42. 1:27alive seven years on with no sign of
  43. 1:29cancer. So, was it the immune system
  44. 1:31activating to fight off the infection
  45. 1:33that also caused the cancer to go away?
  46. 1:36So, in 1891, Coley did something that
  47. 1:38would end his career today. He took a
  48. 1:40patient named Zola, who was an Italian
  49. 1:43immigrant with a tumor in his tonsils
  50. 1:45that was too advanced to cut out, and he
  51. 1:47deliberately infected him. Zola's tumor,
  52. 1:49it regressed completely, and he stayed
  53. 1:51cancer-free for years before,
  54. 1:53unfortunately, the tumor did come back.
  55. 1:55Now, Coley turned that observation into
  56. 1:57a treatment. So, what he did is he
  57. 1:59killed bacteria and then he injected it,
  58. 2:02known as Coley's toxins, and it was
  59. 2:03given to around 1,000 patients. Now,
  60. 2:06some patients did respond, but
  61. 2:07unfortunately, it was remarkably few.
  62. 2:10Most people didn't respond to this
  63. 2:11therapy, and nobody, Coley included,
  64. 2:14could predict who would respond to the
  65. 2:16treatment and who wouldn't. And the
  66. 2:17clinical world's patience at this time
  67. 2:19ran out. In 1894, the Journal of the
  68. 2:22American Medical Association delivered
  69. 2:24its verdict on this approach using it
  70. 2:26toxins as cures, and they labeled it a
  71. 2:29complete failure. Radiation soon arrived
  72. 2:32later with results that you could
  73. 2:33measure and repeat, and Coley used his
  74. 2:35toxins into the 1930s, but the field had
  75. 2:38already moved on. Immunotherapy, as in
  76. 2:41using the immune system to try and treat
  77. 2:43cancer, was pushed to the margins, which
  78. 2:45left a question hanging for 80 years.
  79. 2:48Was Coley wrong, or was he just early?
  80. 2:50Well, for most of the 20th century, it
  81. 2:52looked like Coley was wrong, but in
  82. 2:541976, a urologist injected the
  83. 2:57tuberculosis vaccine directly into the
  84. 3:00bladders of nine bladder cancer
  85. 3:02patients, and it worked. 50 years later,
  86. 3:04it's still the standard of care for
  87. 3:06high-risk early bladder cancers. And in
  88. 3:08the years that followed, the idea of
  89. 3:10using the immune system to target cancer
  90. 3:12grew. And at the National Institutes of
  91. 3:15Health, a surgeon named Steven
  92. 3:17Rosenberg, he had seen his own version
  93. 3:19of the Fred Steinberg immune activation
  94. 3:21miracle. In the summer of 1968, he
  95. 3:24operated on a 63-year-old veteran, a
  96. 3:27routine gallbladder removal, but the
  97. 3:29man's chart said that he should have
  98. 3:30been dead for years.
  99. 3:32Surgeons had opened him up and found
  100. 3:34stomach cancer that had already spread
  101. 3:35to his liver. So, at the time, they
  102. 3:37closed him back up. They gave him no
  103. 3:39treatment, nothing whatsoever. And in
  104. 3:41Rosenberg's own words, he operated to
  105. 3:43remove the gallbladder, but there was no
  106. 3:45remaining trace of the cancer. It's one
  107. 3:47of the rarest events in medicine.
  108. 3:49Something inside that patient had hunted
  109. 3:51down the cancer and destroyed it and
  110. 3:53Rosenberg's prime suspect was that it
  111. 3:55was the immune system. So it took him
  112. 3:57nearly 20 years, but by 1988 he had the
  113. 4:00answer. His team pulled some immune
  114. 4:02cells called T cells out of the
  115. 4:04patient's own melanoma cancers and
  116. 4:06multiplied them in the lab into millions
  117. 4:09and then dripped them back into
  118. 4:10patients' veins. In some patients the
  119. 4:12tumors shrank. That was the proof that
  120. 4:14he needed that by using the immune
  121. 4:16system if it's properly programmed it
  122. 4:18can recognize cancer and kill it. And
  123. 4:20that proof is what launched a potential
  124. 4:22gold rush because if T cells can already
  125. 4:25recognize cancer then a vaccine should
  126. 4:28be a cheap simple way to win because a
  127. 4:30vaccine's whole job is to hold up a
  128. 4:32target and tell the immune system to
  129. 4:34attack it as in attack anything that
  130. 4:36looks like this. So through the 1990s
  131. 4:39there were dozens of potential cancer
  132. 4:40vaccines and the field expected them to
  133. 4:42work but across 1,306
  134. 4:45vaccine treatments the objective
  135. 4:47response rate so as in tumors that
  136. 4:49actually measurably shrunk was only
  137. 4:513.3%. So what was going wrong because it
  138. 4:54feels like there's a potential
  139. 4:55breakthrough here. Well the immune
  140. 4:57system it can destroy cancer on its own
  141. 4:59so Stein, Zola and Rosenberg's Veterans
  142. 5:02patient proved it. T cells taken out of
  143. 5:05the body and then multiplied can destroy
  144. 5:07cancer. Rosenberg had proved that too
  145. 5:09but the vaccines the very tool designed
  146. 5:11to rally those same T cells failed in 97
  147. 5:15patients out of every 100 but that
  148. 5:17didn't stop companies from trying. But
  149. 5:19after four huge failures in the 2000s
  150. 5:21and 2010s it looked like this field was
  151. 5:24done for but from those failures came
  152. 5:26learnings that opened the door for a
  153. 5:28success that happened last week. So
  154. 5:30before you're born your immune system it
  155. 5:32runs essentially a school. Every T cell
  156. 5:35so the white blood cells that hunt
  157. 5:36infected and cancerous cells they face
  158. 5:39one more brutal final exam. Attack any
  159. 5:42protein that belongs to your own body
  160. 5:44and it's destroyed no exceptions. That
  161. 5:46policy is why your immune system doesn't
  162. 5:48just eat you alive. Now, have a look at
  163. 5:50the failed cancer vaccines. Most of them
  164. 5:53pointed the immune system at proteins
  165. 5:55that the cancer shares with the body.
  166. 5:57That's the explanation for the failures.
  167. 5:59Those T cells, they were wiped out and
  168. 6:01were never going to attack the cancerous
  169. 6:03cells. Immunologists call the screening
  170. 6:05process central tolerance. So, in 2015,
  171. 6:08two immunologists put the way forward
  172. 6:10into words. Cancer's own mutations
  173. 6:12create brand new proteins that exist
  174. 6:14nowhere else in the body. So, these
  175. 6:16newer antigens, so neo as in new, the
  176. 6:19body's school has never seen them. So,
  177. 6:21the T cells that can attack these
  178. 6:22cancerous proteins, they've never been
  179. 6:24deleted. They're still in the army
  180. 6:26waiting for a target to attack, which
  181. 6:28leaves one problem. Your tumor's
  182. 6:30mutations, they're not the same as my
  183. 6:32tumor's mutations. So, every single
  184. 6:34patient is different. A shelf vaccine,
  185. 6:36it's never going to work. What we need
  186. 6:38is a personalized approach, a
  187. 6:40personalized vaccine per patient. So,
  188. 6:42here's what's required. First, we need
  189. 6:44to sequence the patient's tumor and then
  190. 6:46their healthy blood and then we need to
  191. 6:47subtract so that we're only left with
  192. 6:50what's mutated in the tumor and not the
  193. 6:52healthy cells. Second, we need to be
  194. 6:54able to predict which of those mutant
  195. 6:56fragments the patient's own immune
  196. 6:57system can actually display on the
  197. 6:59surface of the cell so that the immune
  198. 7:01system can then latch onto them and
  199. 7:02attack them. An immune system, if they
  200. 7:04can't see that, it's useless. So, neural
  201. 7:07AI networks is what does that prediction
  202. 7:09for us. And Moderna's own selection
  203. 7:11algorithm, it is proprietary and it is
  204. 7:13unpublished, but we do know what it
  205. 7:15does. It predicts what's displayable and
  206. 7:18it picks up to 34 targets. Third is that
  207. 7:20we need to encode up to 34 of these
  208. 7:22targets on a single strand of mRNA, wrap
  209. 7:25it up into a microscopic fat droplet, so
  210. 7:28a lipid nanoparticle, and then inject it
  211. 7:30into the patient. And in July 2017, that
  212. 7:33process was tested in 13 humans with
  213. 7:35melanoma, five of which already had
  214. 7:37metastatic disease. And after these
  215. 7:40patients had their personalized vaccine,
  216. 7:42eight who were disease-free at the
  217. 7:43vaccination date, they stayed
  218. 7:45recurrence-free for up to 23 months. And
  219. 7:47then a team in Boston vaccinated six
  220. 7:50melanoma patients with protein fragments
  221. 7:52rather than RNA. Four of the six stayed
  222. 7:55recurrence-free at the 25-month mark,
  223. 7:57and two of those whose cancer had
  224. 7:59progressed, they completely regressed
  225. 8:02once an anti-PD-1 checkpoint drug was
  226. 8:04added. But building a bespoke drug for
  227. 8:06one patient at a time using technology
  228. 8:08at the time was incredibly expensive.
  229. 8:11But then the world was handed the exact
  230. 8:12technology used to scale up this
  231. 8:14concept. So you will already know this
  232. 8:16part, the mRNA technology for COVID.
  233. 8:19Researchers used the mRNA vaccine
  234. 8:21technology to develop personalized
  235. 8:23therapies for 157 patients with resected
  236. 8:27melanoma, as in people who had the
  237. 8:29tumors cut out and were waiting to learn
  238. 8:31whether those tumors would come back.
  239. 8:33This was a randomized control trial, and
  240. 8:34again, we had personalized mRNA vaccines
  241. 8:37plus the checkpoint drug Keytruda or
  242. 8:40Keytruda alone. In December 2022, here
  243. 8:43was the result. The recurrence risk was
  244. 8:45down by roughly 44%. So Merck and
  245. 8:48Moderna, they ran a large follow-up
  246. 8:50phase 3 trial, a double-blind
  247. 8:52placebo-controlled study. And on August
  248. 8:5419th, 2026, here are the results. The
  249. 8:57trial involved 1,137
  250. 9:00patients with completely resected stage
  251. 9:022B to stage 4 melanoma. So this was
  252. 9:06cancer removed by surgery and were at
  253. 9:08high risk of it coming back. They were
  254. 9:10randomized into two groups. So one had
  255. 9:12the personalized therapy plus Keytruda
  256. 9:14versus Keytruda alone. So whatever
  257. 9:17benefit appeared was on top of the
  258. 9:19standard treatment, not instead of it.
  259. 9:21And here's the wonderful news. The
  260. 9:22combination treatment, it successfully
  261. 9:24met its endpoint, meaning that it
  262. 9:26delivered greater results than Keytruda
  263. 9:28alone. Now we don't have the numbers
  264. 9:30yet, but in the preceding phase 2 study,
  265. 9:32there was a 49% reduction in the risk of
  266. 9:35recurrence or death compared to Keytruda
  267. 9:37alone, and a 59% reduction in the risk
  268. 9:40of distant metastases or death compared
  269. 9:42to Keytruda alone. There were also no
  270. 9:44new safety signals observed. The
  271. 9:46companies describe it as the first
  272. 9:48positive phase three trial ever for an
  273. 9:50individualized neoantigen therapy, and
  274. 9:52the first for any mRNA-based cancer
  275. 9:54treatment. But, as Patreon member Red
  276. 9:56asks, for what kinds of cancers do these
  277. 9:59vaccines work? Do they cure cancer, or
  278. 10:01is it just an increase in treatment and
  279. 10:03survival rates by a little bit? Well,
  280. 10:05this is for melanoma treatment. It's not
  281. 10:07prevention, and it's not a cure, but a
  282. 10:09preventive vaccine is already here for
  283. 10:11cancer, and that is the HPV vaccine. It
  284. 10:13blocks the virus behind most cervical
  285. 10:16cancers, and in the US, cancer deaths
  286. 10:18from cervical cancer have fallen by more
  287. 10:20than 60% in over a decade. But, as
  288. 10:23Patreon member Blessy points out, yes,
  289. 10:25this treatment, it did work on melanoma,
  290. 10:27so is it reasonable to be hopeful that
  291. 10:29this should also work for other types of
  292. 10:30tumors as well? Based on my
  293. 10:32understanding of the mechanism, it seems
  294. 10:34like it should. Moderna chose melanoma
  295. 10:36to start with because melanoma is one of
  296. 10:38the most heavily mutated cancers there
  297. 10:40are, so it's got the most raw material
  298. 10:42for neoantigens. So, in theory, it's one
  299. 10:44of the easier cancers to build these
  300. 10:46personalized treatments for. But, the
  301. 10:47good news is that Merck and Moderna
  302. 10:49alone, they are running nine trials of
  303. 10:51this therapy. So, two in melanoma, four
  304. 10:54in lung cancer, three already at phase
  305. 10:56three, one in kidney, and two in
  306. 10:58bladder. And buried in that list is one
  307. 11:00of my favorite details in this entire
  308. 11:01story. So, in high-risk early bladder
  309. 11:04cancer patients, it's being trialed
  310. 11:05alongside BCG. So, that's the same
  311. 11:08tuberculosis vaccine that was started in
  312. 11:101976.
  313. 11:12So, in my view, the main reason why
  314. 11:14Moderna stock price has jumped up so
  315. 11:16much is because there's so much hope
  316. 11:18that this personalized treatment can
  317. 11:19then be translated onto other types of
  318. 11:21cancer. And this whole field is much
  319. 11:23bigger than just one partnership. So, in
  320. 11:25May, there was a study published in
  321. 11:27Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, and they
  322. 11:29mapped out the whole clinical pipeline
  323. 11:31of therapeutic cancer vaccines. And
  324. 11:33Patreon member David Sprouse asks the
  325. 11:35money question. Any idea how affordable
  326. 11:38it is expected to be given the need for
  327. 11:40customization and the extra work
  328. 11:41involved? Well, the truthful answer is
  329. 11:43that at this stage we don't know what
  330. 11:44the costs will be. This therapy isn't
  331. 11:46yet FDA approved and it's not available
  332. 11:48to the general public, but we do have
  333. 11:50reason to be hopeful. With this
  334. 11:52breakthrough will come further
  335. 11:53innovation and it's a really exciting
  336. 11:55path forward, particularly if we see
  337. 11:56positive results from the other cancer
  338. 11:59vaccines that are in the pipeline. And
  339. 12:00it's not just cancer vaccines where
  340. 12:02we're getting these amazing results.
  341. 12:04Recently there was a fantastic result
  342. 12:05published about pancreatic cancer and
  343. 12:07I'll go through the results in this
  344. 12:09video here. And I've put the full
  345. 12:10write-up of this video, so the
  346. 12:12transcript and every study that I've
  347. 12:13cited over at drstanfield.com. Link is
  348. 12:16in the pinned comment. And if you want
  349. 12:17early access to videos like this, as
  350. 12:19well as access to the Discord server,
  351. 12:21make sure to check out Patreon or join
  352. 12:23as a channel member.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of This Vaccine Just Changed Cancer Forever by Dr Brad Stanfield, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,307 words across 352 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.