They did it... — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00So, I've been working on a project
- 0:01recently that made me rethink how all of
- 0:04software is going to be built. I was
- 0:06setting up a new PC and I needed to read
- 0:09a PDF. And the first thing that I did
- 0:11was try to open it, of course, but
- 0:14Windows doesn't have a good built-in PDF
- 0:16reader. And so, reluctantly, I had to go
- 0:20to Adobe Acrobat. Now, I know there's a
- 0:22few other alternatives out there, but
- 0:23Acrobat is kind of the standard. So, I
- 0:26went to download it. I installed it and
- 0:28I hated every second of it. It's
- 0:30bloated. It comes with a bunch of
- 0:31features I don't need. It's trying to
- 0:34push other products. It's even trying to
- 0:36get me to log in. And all the while I'm
- 0:39sitting here and all I'm trying to do is
- 0:41read, maybe edit a PDF. This is really
- 0:43simple stuff. In that moment, rather
- 0:46than suffer with this piece of software,
- 0:48I decided to make my own. And I know
- 0:50this sounds really basic like okay a PDF
- 0:53reader very basic software but it
- 0:55actually has massive implications that I
- 0:58want to talk about in this video because
- 1:00then I started building other pieces of
- 1:01software that I need and not only that
- 1:03there are other developers out there who
- 1:05are building entire software suites like
- 1:08somebody literally cloned the entire
- 1:10Adobe suite including Premiere and After
- 1:13Effects. And so I feel like we're
- 1:14getting into this world where consumers
- 1:17are going to be building their own
- 1:19software. And there are a few things
- 1:20that needed to come together all at the
- 1:22same time to make this happen. And over
- 1:25the last month, I am now convinced they
- 1:28have. Number one, the models had to get
- 1:31good enough. And I'm going to get back
- 1:32to that in a second. Number two, they
- 1:34had to be cheap enough. If you're having
- 1:36to burn tens of millions of tokens to
- 1:40build a piece of software that you can
- 1:41go buy for 10, 20, $30, why would you do
- 1:44it? And then three, it had to be easy
- 1:46enough. And the models wrapped in agents
- 1:49have become so autonomous that it very
- 1:51much is that easy. So this has been
- 1:53growing over the last few months. the
- 1:55models have gotten so good and Opus 5.5
- 1:59was kind of the peak, the turning point
- 2:02at which I can just tell it to make a
- 2:05piece of software or to clone a piece of
- 2:07software and it would go off and do so.
- 2:10And it wasn't just the model quality
- 2:12that allowed it to do that. It was also
- 2:13the fact that the price of the tokens
- 2:16and the cost to complete the task had
- 2:20dropped tremendously. And so there's
- 2:23this calculus going on at all times. How
- 2:27much does it cost to build a custom
- 2:30piece of software for what you need and
- 2:32to maintain it versus how much does it
- 2:34cost to buy a piece of software often
- 2:37times in a subscription model. So you're
- 2:40paying this ongoing fee for it. And I
- 2:42think we've hit this critical point in
- 2:44which the cost of tokens to build and
- 2:47maintain a piece of software is now less
- 2:49expensive than simply buying it. And the
- 2:52cool thing is when you're building it
- 2:54yourself, you get the exact features you
- 2:56need. Even if the feature wouldn't have
- 2:59applied or been attractive to anybody
- 3:02else, it doesn't matter. You build it
- 3:04for yourself. So the models have now
- 3:06gotten to the point where they're good
- 3:07enough. I mean, let me give you a few
- 3:10examples. So I've been doing model
- 3:12testing for a couple years now. It
- 3:15started way back where I just said,
- 3:16"Okay, make the game snake in Python."
- 3:20And that was like dead simple. And the
- 3:22models just kept getting better where
- 3:24that snake game was too easy. So I moved
- 3:27on to harder things. And one of those
- 3:29kind of more well-known harder things
- 3:31was build a Rubik's cube simulation. And
- 3:34the models got so good at that. And so I
- 3:37had to come up with these new tests to
- 3:40test the latest models on. And what I
- 3:42decided to do was just simply rebuild
- 3:45software from the ground up. and I would
- 3:47point it at Microsoft Excel. One of the
- 3:50most complex pieces of software on the
- 3:53planet, one of the most used pieces of
- 3:56software on the planet. I would just say
- 3:58a simple prompt, go clone Excel and it
- 4:01would do pretty well for a while. When
- 4:04we were on like GPT5 model and prior to
- 4:06Fable coming out, they would be able to
- 4:08get pretty close. there would be a lot
- 4:10of rough edges and it wouldn't be
- 4:12feature complete but you know it would
- 4:15look like Microsoft Excel and then these
- 4:17latest generation of models dropped and
- 4:19it would just simply clone Excel like
- 4:21end to end not over multiple days
- 4:23either. I mean I'm talking about within
- 4:25a matter of 90 minutes or maybe a couple
- 4:28hours it would fully clone Excel every
- 4:31feature every piece of functionality. I
- 4:33would make it browserbased and in fact
- 4:35I'll go ahead and drop my latest version
- 4:37down below so you can play with it. But
- 4:38the point is it was able to build it.
- 4:40And now if you wanted to use Microsoft
- 4:43Excel, the standalone Microsoft Excel is
- 4:46$180
- 4:48for a single license, but you get a
- 4:51lifetime, which, you know, fine. It's a
- 4:53very valuable piece of software. $180
- 4:56over the lifetime of the piece of
- 4:57software. Or you're going to be paying a
- 4:59subscription, which is, you know,
- 5:01between $7 and $10 per month, and you
- 5:03get Excel and Word and PowerPoint and
- 5:05everything else. But then I spent maybe
- 5:07$10 in tokens to rebuild it with
- 5:11complete feature parody. And now I can
- 5:14take that and open source it and give it
- 5:16to the world for free. And it is
- 5:18becoming more and more apparent that the
- 5:22value of software is approaching zero.
- 5:24the cost of software will be zero
- 5:28because anybody with a $200 a month
- 5:33subscription to Claude or to Chad GPT
- 5:36can simply just build any software they
- 5:38want and release it to the world. And
- 5:39then somebody else can take that base
- 5:42and modify it how they want costing a
- 5:45fraction of what the original buildout
- 5:47costs and everybody just gets exactly
- 5:49what they need. And if this sounds
- 5:51familiar, it's called open source. I
- 5:54really do believe that all software in
- 5:56the future is going to be de facto open-
- 5:58source. And so I'm going to show you
- 5:59some other projects that I made in a
- 6:01minute. But the reason I really think
- 6:03that is because the recent growth and
- 6:06popularity of decompiling software. And
- 6:09if that sounds complicated, it's really
- 6:12not. And I've been building all of this
- 6:14software lately on my new Nvidia RTX
- 6:16Spark machine. It is truly phenomenal
- 6:19and it's become my daily driver laptop.
- 6:21Let me tell you about it. This is the
- 6:23new Microsoft Surface Laptop Ultra and
- 6:26it is unlike other laptops. This is all
- 6:28powered by the Nvidia RTX Spark. Nvidia
- 6:31is now making both the CPU and GPU. It's
- 6:33a Grace CPU, a Blackwell RTX GPU, and it
- 6:38shares up to 128 gigs of unified memory
- 6:42and RTX Spark, which is what's powering
- 6:44it, has CUDA natively, so you have
- 6:47Nvidia software for accelerating AI
- 6:49right on the machine. I've been testing
- 6:51it. I've been running local models. I've
- 6:53been playing Gears of War. I've been
- 6:55video editing and kind of all at the
- 6:58same time. So, the materials that they
- 6:59used to build this laptop feel
- 7:01absolutely premium. And even when I'm
- 7:03running AI and playing games on it, it
- 7:06doesn't get that hot, and I don't really
- 7:07understand how they did that. The fan is
- 7:09relatively quiet. It comes with a 15-in
- 7:12touchscreen, so I can play with my
- 7:13little Rubik's Cube simulation all day
- 7:15long. So, go check out the Nvidia RTX
- 7:17Spark laptops. I'll drop a link down
- 7:19below. And so besides for the software
- 7:21that I was building for myself, I
- 7:23started seeing other people decompile
- 7:25software and probably the most
- 7:27well-known one which I covered in a
- 7:29video is called Artcraft. It is the
- 7:31entire Adobe suite of products,
- 7:34open-source and completely free. Here's
- 7:36PhotoCraft. I mean, look at this. It
- 7:38looks exactly like Photoshop. Here's
- 7:40Vectorcraft for creating vectors. Here's
- 7:43Filmcraft, which is basically Adobe
- 7:45Premiere. Here it is. It looks
- 7:47beautiful. And so what this guy did was
- 7:49simply point his AI at an existing piece
- 7:51of software and said, "Iterate until you
- 7:54clone it." Exactly. And so this was one
- 7:56of the most exciting projects I had seen
- 7:58in a while. Okay, so it's definitely
- 8:00happening now. And I'm going to show you
- 8:01a few pieces of software that I've been
- 8:04building myself. But first, how did we
- 8:06actually get here? So a couple years
- 8:07ago, I made this video called SAS is
- 8:09dead. And it proposed this thesis that
- 8:11all software was going to collapse down
- 8:13into agents. agents just being able to
- 8:15accomplish whatever like the actual
- 8:18application wasn't even needed anymore.
- 8:20And then the other thing is kind of a
- 8:22layer of database like the actual ground
- 8:24truth which needs to be stored in a more
- 8:26traditional database. It can't be done
- 8:28by AI. And so it's going to be those two
- 8:30layers. And that was specifically in the
- 8:32enterprise, but I never really thought
- 8:33that consumers would be able to build
- 8:35their own software. And maybe not they
- 8:38weren't going to be capable to do it,
- 8:40but it wouldn't make sense to do. But
- 8:42then, you know, fast forward to just a
- 8:44few weeks ago and that is not the case
- 8:46anymore. Like the math to build your own
- 8:49software now favors building your own
- 8:51software versus buying. And so, let me
- 8:53show you Folio. This is my PDF reader
- 8:56editor. You can eign with it. You can
- 8:59use AI to ask questions about the PDF.
- 9:02And if there's any other functionality I
- 9:04want, I can just simply add it in here.
- 9:06And it's lightweight. It's lightning
- 9:08fast. It's completely free. It's open
- 9:10source. I'll drop a link down below so
- 9:11you can get it and use it if you want.
- 9:13You can fork it, make it your own. So,
- 9:16look here. I'll click here and, you
- 9:18know, simple. It's a PDF reader. You can
- 9:21draw on it. You can add notes to it. You
- 9:23can ask questions to it. You can do a
- 9:25whole bunch of cool stuff. And it just
- 9:27works. And I'm not going to pay for this
- 9:29software again. Uh there's no reason to
- 9:31download Adobe Acrobat. And then there
- 9:33was this piece of software I used for a
- 9:35while called One of 10. It allowed me to
- 9:38see how other people's videos were
- 9:39performing. It gave me stats on those
- 9:41videos, stats on different channels. And
- 9:43then they just started adding all this
- 9:45functionality that I never needed. And
- 9:47now they're making me authenticate, give
- 9:49them my information. It started to
- 9:52clutter up YouTube. Like they would take
- 9:54up 30% of the real estate of the screen.
- 9:56They just have a bunch of features that
- 9:58I will never need. So I built my own.
- 10:00This is called Outlier Tracker. And now
- 10:02I can see on each video. It gives me
- 10:05some stats on the video. I can track the
- 10:07video. I can do a channel analysis. It's
- 10:09the exact functionality I needed from
- 10:11one of 10. And now it's mine. And this
- 10:13took like 30 minutes to build. And
- 10:15here's that Excel clone that I
- 10:16mentioned. It is full Excel in the
- 10:18browser. I mean, it works perfectly.
- 10:21It's absolutely beautiful. It has all
- 10:23the functionality, every single piece of
- 10:26functionality that you would ever want.
- 10:28And so, where does this fall short? I
- 10:30think one of the common arguments
- 10:32against individuals, consumers building
- 10:34their own software and also enterprise
- 10:36building their own software is that it's
- 10:38not enough just to build it, you also
- 10:40have to maintain it and you have to
- 10:42think about security and keeping it up
- 10:44to date. And there's a reason for that.
- 10:46there have been increasing amount of
- 10:48hacks. And so if you're building, you
- 10:51know, what people would consider slop
- 10:53software or vibecoded software, maybe
- 10:55it's going to be full of a bunch of
- 10:56holes and you have to maintain the
- 10:59software over time, but I don't know if
- 11:01that's necessarily true. I think AI is
- 11:04writing better and better software and
- 11:06the models getting better means that
- 11:08they will be more hardened and more
- 11:10secure. And there's this graph that you
- 11:12can plot in which the cost of just
- 11:15running an agent all the time constantly
- 11:19updating the software constantly looking
- 11:21for security issues is actually less
- 11:23than buying the software from someone
- 11:24else. But let's say you don't even want
- 11:26to do that. I mean you can go and
- 11:29download an open source piece of
- 11:30software because I guarantee there are a
- 11:32lot of other developers who are just
- 11:34creating software and giving it out for
- 11:36free like Artcraft and they are
- 11:38maintaining it. they are just
- 11:39continuously throwing tokens at it. And
- 11:41as the cost of tokens continues to
- 11:44decrease to basically zero, there's
- 11:48almost like this just desire to build
- 11:51and it's essentially free to build and
- 11:54you can put stuff out there and have
- 11:55people use it and it's exciting and just
- 11:59kind of the love of the craft of
- 12:01building. And so I really do think we're
- 12:03in this renaissance of software where
- 12:05every individual is just going to build
- 12:08the software that they need. Exactly.
- 12:10And the one last thing I want to mention
- 12:13is Omari, which is a new operating
- 12:16system by the guy who created Ruby on
- 12:18Rails. And they have AI embedded in its
- 12:21DNA to the point where you can customize
- 12:24the operating system to be exactly what
- 12:26you want it to be at all times. And
- 12:28that's super exciting to me. I mean, you
- 12:30can more or less do some of that with
- 12:33Windows right now, but to fully
- 12:35customize the operating system at all
- 12:37times, I think it's quite exciting to
- 12:39think maybe there is room for a new
- 12:41operating system. So, I encourage you go
- 12:44check out open- source, try to build a
- 12:46little app for yourself, see how far you
- 12:48get, and then see how far you can go.
- 12:50And one of the best open source models
- 12:51on the planet right now is Deepseek V4.1
- 12:54Flash. I did a full video about that.
- 12:56You should go check that out right
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of They did it... by Matthew Berman, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,480 words across 340 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.