The Plane That's 38% Nose — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00This is the X59, NASA's latest Xplane and the newest creation from Loheed Martin's Secretive
- 0:05Skunk Works in Palmdale, California. The same facility that produced the SR71, F-17 Nighthawk,
- 0:12P-38, F-35, and F-22. This plane is designed to do one thing. Make supersonic boom so quiet
- 0:19that a supersonic transport could fly over a city and barely disturb a mouse. With the
- 0:25insane experience in a house at Skunkworks, this plane became a Frankenstein monster.
- 0:30Pieced together with parts and lessons from F-16s, T38s, and even an old F-17 Nighthawk,
- 0:36resulting in one of the most aerodynamically interesting Xplanes in recent memory. But can
- 0:41it really accomplish its mission? This is the insane engineering of the X59 Quest.
- 0:51The X59 is littered with interesting design choices, but its key feature is right here.
- 0:56This weird nose. From tip to nose wheel, it takes up over half the plane. The pilot can't even see
- 1:02out of the cockpit, and the center of gravity is 3/4 down the plane where the wings curve deep
- 1:07into the slim waisted fuse lo. All these sharp twisting features are the result of a decade of
- 1:12aerospace research on how to slice through the air in an entirely new way. one that the X59
- 1:18hopes will bring back supersonic flight. Because ever since the Concord last flew, commercial air
- 1:24travel has been subsonic and actually slowing down yearbyear. Part of the reason for that, arguably
- 1:30the main reason, is the lack of suitable routes for supersonic passenger planes. The Conqueror
- 1:35flew only a few select flights over the Atlantic where it sonic boom couldn't bother anyone.
- 1:41If we can quieten the booms, more routes would open and drive money into the development of
- 1:46supersonic passenger planes. The X59's unique design choices are all in pursuit of this goal.
- 1:52But let's start by explaining why it's impossible to be both supersonic and silent. This is a
- 1:58plane flying at 200 m/s, the speed of a regular airliner. Like any object pushing through the air,
- 2:05it generates pressure waves. They spread out in all directions at the speed of sound. Most forces
- 2:11transmit this way. You just don't notice the delay between pushing a table and seeing it move because
- 2:16the speed of sound in a solid is so high. Aircraft just fly fast enough that it starts to matter. Now
- 2:22watch as the plane speeds up. The pressure waves traveling ahead of it don't get very far before
- 2:26the plane catches up with them, causing them to stack up and increase in pressure. And that's
- 2:32how a shock wave is born. This causes a sudden disruption of the air flowing over the plane
- 2:37and sharply increases the drag it experiences. In fact, the drag coefficient of a regular airliner
- 2:43will double or triple at this air speed with a corresponding increase in the forces acting on
- 2:48its airframe too. These were enough to tear apart the first aircraft traveling at these speeds. And
- 2:53it was so difficult to get past them that pilots coined the term sound barrier to describe it. And
- 2:59it's even worse when not all parts of the plane go supersonic at the same time. Here's the profile of
- 3:05a regular wing. Air flowing over the leading edge speeds up as it follows the curve. That
- 3:10can push it past Mach 1, even if the rest of the plane is slightly subsonic. Air transitioning from
- 3:15subsonic to supersonic and back to subsonic again doesn't follow the wing surface smoothly, causing
- 3:21it to separate into turbulent flow that violently shakes the wing. This is called MAC buffeting. The
- 3:26aerodynamic center of the plane, the average point where lift is generated, also shifts to the rear.
- 3:32This effect, called Mac tuck, tends to pull the rear up, causing the whole plane to pitch down.
- 3:37If you're already in a dive, this deepens it, something that affected the P38 and required
- 3:43the addition of a dive flap to save pilots who found themselves in high-speed dives. The X59,
- 3:48of course, is built to handle this. It has delta wings that can survive aerodynamic forces without
- 3:54much structural support. They are highly swept, effectively reducing the velocity of the air
- 3:59perpendicular to the leading edge. In fact, the sweep angle is deliberately chosen to be steep
- 4:04enough that the entire wing can hide inside the shock cone generated at the nose. Inside the cone,
- 4:10the wings act as if they were in regular subsonic air flow, avoiding the formation of shock waves
- 4:15over their surfaces and becoming dramatically more efficient. The wing profile is different,
- 4:20too. Compared to a regular wing, it is very thin and symmetrical from top to bottom. Air flowing
- 4:26over the wing doesn't accelerate as much, so it's harder to form shock waves and separate
- 4:30into turbulent flow. The shock waves above and below the wing are balanced, too, reducing mock
- 4:35buffeting. The downside to this profile is that it doesn't produce lift unless it enters the air at
- 4:41an angle, unlike a regular wing. But you can see that the X59's wings are installed with a natural
- 4:47angle already. To maintain control, the X59 uses all moving stabilators instead of elevants in
- 4:53the tail. If the whole control surface tilts into the airflow, there's nothing behind the turbulent
- 4:58wake. So control is retained at supersonic speeds. It adds a supersonic trim. That is,
- 5:04it tilts the nose up to counter the rearward shift in its center of lift caused by Mac Tuck. Normally
- 5:10doing so adds drag, but the canards in the nose are angled in a way to passively move the center
- 5:15of lift back to the front. So, the amount of trim the X59 needs is cleverly reduced. Now,
- 5:21the X59 accelerates past Mach 1. It is going supersonic, outrunning its own pressure waves as
- 5:28they get dragged behind it in a narrowing shock cone. The X59's design speed is Mach 1.4, which
- 5:34is 413 m/s in the cold air at 15 km altitude. At this speed, its pressure waves are pressed into
- 5:41a 45° cone, an unavoidable aspect of breaking the sound barrier that makes it impossible to
- 5:47fly silently. If you were standing on the ground with one of these planes speeding overhead, you'd
- 5:52see it move past silently. Then, after delay, you'd hear a distinct bang bang. This double
- 5:58boom sweeps over the landscape, and it can be strong enough to shake buildings or break windows.
- 6:03The reason it's so powerful is because the shock waves from a supersonic aircraft merge as they
- 6:09spread away from the aircraft, adding up their energy until there's two peaks in an N-shaped
- 6:14wave. This Nwave weakens as it travels down, but enough energy is gathered in each peak to produce
- 6:20a loud double boom at ground level. Quest goal is not to eliminate supersonic booms, but to alter
- 6:26them in a way that they are no longer disruptive to the people on the ground. There's two parts
- 6:31to it. weakening the shock waves so they become quieter and then shaping them so they don't become
- 6:37a powerful n-wave. The first part relies heavily on the Witcom area rule discovered by Richard
- 6:43Wickcom in 1952 while experimenting with wind tunnels. It basically states that abrupt changes
- 6:49in the cross-sectional area of a plane from nose to tail are what create the strongest shock waves.
- 6:55A fuselage like a straight cylinder would have a constant cross-section until the air flow
- 6:59reaches the wings which suddenly adds a lot of cross-sectional area. In the earliest supersonic
- 7:05planes, this was the source of a very strong shock wave which resulted in immense drag. If
- 7:10instead the fuse latch narrowed at the point where the wings were attached, the change in
- 7:14cross-sectional area would be less abrupt and the shock waves would be weakened. Planes which
- 7:19follow the Wickcom area rule typically have a coke bottle fuselage with a narrow waist and smooth
- 7:25curves. Modern aircraft analyze every change in cross-sectional area to follow the Wickcom rule
- 7:31from the cockpit bubble to the rudder placement. But the X59 applies the area rule differently. It
- 7:37is trying to generate the weakest shock waves by having the smoothest transitions possible between
- 7:42its thick and thin sections. That's why the nose is so long and why the cockpit blends seamlessly
- 7:47with the fuselage. And because of this, the pilot has to rely entirely on the cameras and screens of
- 7:53its external vision system to fly the plane. At the point where the wings are the widest,
- 7:58the fuselage is also the narrowest. The engine looks like it sticks out,
- 8:02but the airflow sees it as a hollow tube rather than an obstacle, so it doesn't actually change
- 8:07the cross-sectional area as much as you would expect. In the rear, the tail is short with
- 8:12the rudder bridging the gap between the wings and the stabilators. Thanks to these features,
- 8:17the only strong shock waves that are generated are near the canards and the engine intake. The intake
- 8:22has a special bump called a divertless supersonic inlet that solves two problems with high-speed
- 8:27flight. You can see these on the most advanced fighter jet, the F-35. As air travels along the
- 8:33length of the body, air begins to form a layer of slowmoving turbulent air called a boundary layer.
- 8:39If this air is allowed to enter the engine, it not only lowers performance, it can also damage
- 8:44the engine. As the turbine rotates, it will pass through the slow boundary air on one side and then
- 8:50the fast free stream air on the other. This means the force on the turbine blade changes for each
- 8:56and every rotation, causing cyclical bending, a recipe for fatigue failure. Planes like the F-16
- 9:03feature a boundary layer diverter that separates the inlet from the fuselage with a small gap,
- 9:09but this design increases drag. Later variants of the F-16 tested the DSI, a divertless supersonic
- 9:16inlet, essentially a large bump that creates a region of compression that pushes the boundary
- 9:21layer away from the inlet while lowering drag. The test flight demonstrated it could meet performance
- 9:27requirements, ushering in its introduction to the F-35. The final product reduces weight by 30% and
- 9:34lowers production and maintenance costs. The X59 takes it to the next level by moving it onto its
- 9:40back, so the shock wave it produces is directed up and away from the ground. The next step in
- 9:46Quest design is to shape the sonic boom. If the main wings did all of the lifting, there'd be a
- 9:51single strong shock wave centered on them. With the canards, large stabils, and little fins on the
- 9:57rudder, the sources of lift are distributed along the plane's length, resulting in multiple smaller
- 10:02shock waves precisely spaced out from each other. The X59's unconventional layout helps it move all
- 10:08of these shock waves far enough apart that they don't merge as they travel down to the ground.
- 10:14Instead of adding up into a single N-wave, they stay separate and weak all the way to the ground
- 10:19where they're heard as a longer, softer thump rather than a short boom. The objective here is to
- 10:25reduce the volume of a sonic boom down to 75 dB. That's like a door slamming shut across the street
- 10:32or a small truck passing you on the highway. To get to this point, the X59 was put through
- 10:37a rigorous regime of computer simulations and wind tunnel tests. Every bump and curve was mapped out
- 10:43and its effects on the air flow calculated by the advanced supercomputing division at the AS
- 10:49research center. Scale models of the X59 were placed into wind tunnels at NASA's Langley,
- 10:54Loheed Skunk Works, and even Jax's test facility in Tokyo. All of this makes the X59
- 11:00a unique design, but it's not the first plane to try to shape its own sonic booms. The most
- 11:06recent is this NASA F-15B that collaborated with Gulfream Aerospace on the quiet spike project. A
- 11:13multi-stage 7.3 m extendable spike was installed on its nose, adding 38% to the jet's length that
- 11:20helped split the shock cone at the front of the plane into three smaller shock waves. Before that,
- 11:25the same F-15B tail number 836 was used to trial an ugly duckling F5E fitted with the much longer
- 11:32nose and modified fuselage to measure whether it could reduce the intensity of its sonic boom in
- 11:38flight. It did so by one/3. The X59 program is the most serious attempt at designing a plane
- 11:44purpose-built for reducing sonic booms. Loheed Martin Skunk Works got a quarter of a billion
- 11:49dollar contract to build it. Parts from existing planes were used wherever possible to save
- 11:54time and reduce costs, which is why it got the landing gear of a Falcon, the engine of a Hornet,
- 12:00the cockpit canopy of a T38 Talon, the control stick of a Nighthawk, and even components from a
- 12:05U2 spy plane. After 5 years in the workshop, the X59 rolled out in 2023. The X59 was unveiled to
- 12:13the public on the 12th of January 2024, but its first cautious flight only happened on October
- 12:192025. In 2026, it is still being put through its paces. It reached an altitude of 6 km in April,
- 12:26then went supersonic for the first time in June 2026. A week later, it reached its design speed
- 12:33of Mach 1.4 at an altitude of 15 km. The next step is to fly over Edward's Air Force Base while
- 12:40surrounded by sensors and microphones, both on the ground and flying alongside it at all altitudes to
- 12:46demonstrate that the low boom concept will work in the real world. Wind tunnel testing doesn't
- 12:51say what weather, winds, clouds, and terrain due to the impact of sonic booms on the ground. So,
- 12:57the data can only be gathered live. Then the big test. The X59 will be flown over several
- 13:03US cities to measure how residents will react to its sonic booms. This community response testing
- 13:09is the most important step in changing flight regulations from a straightup supersonic ban to
- 13:14a 5.3 Pascal ground pressure restriction. If it succeeds, the door may open to a new generation
- 13:20of supersonic passenger flight. But a quieter supersonic boom doesn't solve all the problems.
- 13:26Technology may have progressed, but it's arguably more difficult economically to pull off today,
- 13:31mostly on fuel costs. Supersonic jets need smaller fuselages to cut down on drag and
- 13:37thus can spread the cost of fuel across as many passengers. With fuel costs higher than ever,
- 13:42the next big challenge is getting fuel demands lower. But that's no easy task. The engineers of
- 13:47the X59 chose to use a reliable off-the-shelf military engine, the General Electric F414,
- 13:54the same engine the Super Hornet uses. This was primarily a cost of development choice, but these
- 14:00engines will just not cut it for a commercial application. The Concord was excellent in Super
- 14:06Cruise. Its four Olympus engines turned out to be the most thermodynamically efficient motors
- 14:10of their time, thanks to a complex arrangement of intake ramps that could compress the incoming air,
- 14:16slowing it down while recovering its kinetic energy as pressure rather than wasting it. That
- 14:22way, it could super cruise at Mach 2, but getting up to super cruise required costly
- 14:27afterurners. The Soviets actually beat the Concord into service with the Tupalev Tu44.
- 14:33It was heavier, faster with 42% more powerful engines and canards to help it lift off. But
- 14:39its tragically unlucky career was terminated after 3 years. The X59 inherits features from both. Its
- 14:46delta wings are actually double deltas similar to the Concord with the inner portion at 76° and the
- 14:52outer portion at 68.6°. Its canards also help by generating vortices that spill over onto the main
- 14:59wing at low speed. The next piece of the puzzle is creating an engine that can run efficiently at
- 15:04both subsonic and supersonic speeds. Astromechanic is designing and testing hybrid engines with
- 15:10an electric fan mode at low speed, an efficient turbo fan mode for transonic to supersonic flight,
- 15:16and a ramjet mode to keep it pushing up to Mach 3. A design this advanced is only made possible
- 15:21by recent progress in high powertoweight ratio electric motors, dense batteries,
- 15:26and heatresistant ceramic turbine blades. And just a little side note, my other company, Throttle,
- 15:32actually created these animations for Astrome Mechanica. If you run an engineering company
- 15:37and need help making animations, we can help you out. With engines like these, a supersonic plane
- 15:42could enter a virtuous cycle of needing less fuel to make a trip, which means smaller wings to take
- 15:47off, which leads to less drag and smaller engines, which in turn reduce the fuel needed further,
- 15:52which would also potentially open up options for longer range trans-pacific routes,
- 15:57which could prove extremely valuable. But it's not a done deal. Private companies have
- 16:02attempted to bring back supersonic flight since the Concord ended in 2003. The Aryan Corporation
- 16:08spent between500 million and a billion dollars on its AS2 design, a sort of supersonic business jet,
- 16:14but failed after declaring the effort would take closer to $10 billion. Exos, Virgin Galactic,
- 16:20and Spike Aerospace have all tried and failed. Boom Aerospace is the current contender. They plan
- 16:26to deliver an 80 seat supersonic jet called the Overture, which would super cruise at Mach 1.7.
- 16:32It has raised about $600 million to do it and has been working on it for the past decade when
- 16:38it isn't busy designing gas turbines to power AI data centers. That is instead of a painstakingly
- 16:44designed airframe with a shaped sonic boom like the X59, they're relying on Mac cutoff,
- 16:49a phenomenon where sonic booms don't reach the ground if they start out between Mach 1.1 and Mach
- 16:541.3 at around 10 km altitude. A phenomenon they have tested once and claimed success. Simply put,
- 17:02sonic booms are sound waves that refract when traveling through air of different densities,
- 17:06and they can bend enough to make a U-turn in the air and never reach the ground under specific
- 17:12weather conditions. This means Boom Aerospace would be constantly adjusting its speed, altitude,
- 17:17and flight path while navigating through the atmosphere, looking for those perfect
- 17:22conditions. There's still no guarantee that Boom Aerospace or some other company will succeed.
- 17:28Supersonic jets will always be more expensive than subsonic airliners just because they
- 17:33take more fuel and make more sacrifices to carry each passenger. Rising fuel costs and
- 17:38businesses relying on video calls rather than physical meetings in other countries are also
- 17:42making them less likely. But there are a lot of people who will pay thousands of dollars to
- 17:47save themselves a few hours. And with 5,500 new millionaires being printed every single
- 17:53day around the world, finding a market for these faster planes might not be so difficult. Just to
- 18:00demonstrate how far technology has come since the Concord made its first flight in 1969,
- 18:05this was how big state-of-the-art calculators were at the time. This is the AL-1000 Commodore,
- 18:11manufactured by Casio in Japan in 1968. It's a beautiful piece of computer history.
- 18:17It has just 448 bits of memory from its core memory array which stores data on tiny iron
- 18:23rings. And these high voltage Nixie tubes demanded a fairly complex power supply. I bought this as
- 18:29part of a Nebula series where I put cool objects like the Nokia 3310 and the first generation iPod
- 18:35into a CT scanner and then used the Volutric models to make messmerizing animations. Well,
- 18:41this calculator is both too big and too heavy to fit in the CT scanners we are using. So,
- 18:48uh I I messed up there. But it did kickstart a new obsession for me. Uh the history of old
- 18:54calculators. So, instead, the first episode is about the Curta mechanical calculator,
- 18:59which is an absolutely fascinating little portable calculator that uses gears and rotating levers for
- 19:05calculations. You can watch that episode when it releases on Nebula next month. With the help of
- 19:10Nebula, we hired a new animator with a background in electronic engineering to take the animation
- 19:15technique we developed to make one of these episodes a month. Next month, we'll be going
- 19:20further down this new calculator collecting hobby with the Sharp E8, which launched just 4 years
- 19:25after this gigantic thing and benefited from the new arms race in microchip development. So,
- 19:31subscribe to Nebula if you want to watch me obsess over old calculators for the next few months.
- 19:37A monthly subscription to Nebula is usually $6. But with my link or the QR code on screen right
- 19:42now, you can get an entire year's membership for just $30. Or if you're sick of signing up
- 19:48to new subscription services like I am, we've created a lifetime membership if you'd rather
- 19:52just pay it and forget it. With YouTube policies changing more and more in favor of slop scrolling,
- 19:58every subscriber over Nebula counts where we can focus on the things that really get us excited.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The Plane That's 38% Nose by Real Engineering, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,526 words across 212 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.