The Man Who Called the Last Two Crashes Says Your House Price Won’t Recover After This One — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Fred, you have famously predicted the
- 0:02last
- 0:03two house price crashes. Um
- 0:06very famously in
- 0:08your amazing book Boom Bust, but also in
- 0:11the power in the land and some of your
- 0:13other books. And you have been accurate,
- 0:16extremely accurate. Some would say the
- 0:19only accurate forecaster of these booms.
- 0:22Now the economic indicators are telling
- 0:25us that we are entering the next house
- 0:29price bust. It's It's everything all the
- 0:33the number of mortgages, the lending.
- 0:35We're about to enter into a horrendous
- 0:38recession. Once again, caused by that
- 0:42speculation in house prices and other
- 0:44monopoly assets.
- 0:46But we know everybody's talked about
- 0:49that, but what
- 0:51is it going to recover? If people are
- 0:54going to make money and make investment
- 0:56decisions, all this kind of stuff. When
- 0:59is this recovery? And will the recovery
- 1:03be the same as the recovery you've
- 1:06predicted in our other
- 1:08boom bust scenarios?
- 1:11>> No.
- 1:12This time
- 1:14it's different in a
- 1:16historic manner.
- 1:19The only comparable
- 1:21period
- 1:23with the current times is the two
- 1:26last
- 1:28economic revolutions. The first one was
- 1:32the agricultural revolution and the
- 1:34second one was the industrial
- 1:37revolution.
- 1:39What those revolutions did was to shift
- 1:43the
- 1:44source and repository of
- 1:49the nation's net income, the rents,
- 1:55away from how things had been
- 1:57distributed previously to
- 2:00match the new realities.
- 2:03So, with the Industrial Revolution,
- 2:06the value of the rents was shifted from
- 2:10farmland to urban land.
- 2:14We are now in a period when the value of
- 2:18urban land is being shifted to a new
- 2:22sphere.
- 2:24Well, where is that sphere?
- 2:27Well, it's where
- 2:29the
- 2:30cash-rich investors are speculating
- 2:34uh heavily, dangerously, and
- 2:38the sphere is
- 2:41the concept is the metaverse.
- 2:44We're now entering the digital
- 2:46revolution.
- 2:49The rents will be shifted from urban
- 2:52locations to
- 2:54those locations that accommodate the
- 2:57digital technologies
- 3:00where the big bucks will be made in the
- 3:02future.
- 3:04So, one consequence of that is that
- 3:07house prices will not recover
- 3:11uh as they have done at the end of
- 3:13previous cycles.
- 3:15They will go down and uh
- 3:18they will stay down in a in real terms.
- 3:24Real prices, real values.
- 3:28Instead, if you want to speculate in the
- 3:32capital gains from rents,
- 3:35you have to speculate in
- 3:37data centers
- 3:40and those locations
- 3:42and in the
- 3:45natural assets that generate the biggest
- 3:49returns on rents.
- 3:51The where are they from?
- 3:53Well,
- 3:55uh
- 3:57they are
- 3:59there are two sources, and they are both
- 4:03highways.
- 4:06The
- 4:08things that make our phones so useful is
- 4:12the data that we collect, which comes
- 4:15from
- 4:19the near-Earth orbit satellites
- 4:22that
- 4:23collect the data from Earth and then
- 4:26transmit them back
- 4:28to our phones.
- 4:31Those That highway
- 4:34is
- 4:35extraordinarily
- 4:36valuable and will become more so in the
- 4:39future.
- 4:40The other highway is the ocean floor.
- 4:44>> Mhm.
- 4:45>> The
- 4:45The cables that connect continents that
- 4:49brings the data
- 4:51from the other side of the world to my
- 4:54PC in my in my office at home.
- 4:58These are generating
- 5:02huge rents.
- 5:04Nobody No government is collecting those
- 5:08rents. Therefore,
- 5:10the
- 5:12tech companies, the tech barons, thank
- 5:15you very much, are collecting
- 5:18that revenue
- 5:19for themselves, which is why the richest
- 5:22people in the world today are sitting in
- 5:24Silicon Valley.
- 5:26They control the
- 5:29digital technologies that are able to
- 5:32capture. They don't own these highways
- 5:36on the ocean floors or
- 5:39the communication channels from the
- 5:42orbital
- 5:45satellites,
- 5:47but because governments don't collect
- 5:50those rents to fund public services,
- 5:54the tech barons collect the rents.
- 5:56>> [clears throat]
- 5:58>> That's where the value is shifting to,
- 6:01away from urban locations.
- 6:04And the other
- 6:06aspect about the urban locations,
- 6:09I'm afraid, is a tragic one.
- 6:12As the humanoids replace humans, wages
- 6:18will continue to slide in real value,
- 6:21which means that people have less to be
- 6:24able to afford to fund shelter
- 6:28and the public services that they
- 6:30personally need in the their
- 6:32communities, so the value of those
- 6:35locations will continue to decline
- 6:37further.
- 6:39Uh
- 6:40as
- 6:41corporations sack
- 6:44employees by the thousand in order to
- 6:48get this cheap technology, the AI
- 6:50technology, so
- 6:53people find themselves unemployed having
- 6:55to take uh
- 6:57accept lower wages on lower-skilled
- 7:00jobs, and that impacts what they can
- 7:04afford to pay for shelter. So,
- 7:08the housing market is one of the sites
- 7:12of the biggest shifts that is now
- 7:15beginning to take place. And
- 7:20we have to reconcile ourselves to it.
- 7:23People who felt that they had
- 7:24accumulated a lot of capital gains for
- 7:27their old age or to pass to their
- 7:30children will be disappointed
- 7:33uh because that is the reality. We are
- 7:37now in a revolution
- 7:40uh
- 7:41unparalleled in the past.
- 7:44In the past, with the agricultural
- 7:47revolution when land was enclosed and
- 7:49people were turfed off by the the land
- 7:52barons that came into existence,
- 7:55people could migrate and create new
- 7:58lives
- 7:59uh on other continents even.
- 8:01And similarly so even with the beginning
- 8:05of the Industrial Revolution, there was
- 8:07plenty of uh uh underused land in
- 8:11Americas and in Australia and New
- 8:14Zealand where people could migrate to.
- 8:17Which then left uh
- 8:20the opportunity for house prices to
- 8:22start rising both
- 8:24from in the communities they left and
- 8:28uh in the places where they migrated to.
- 8:32But that's no no longer the case. Now
- 8:35there is nowhere no safe haven to turn
- 8:38to.
- 8:39Uh
- 8:41we are stuck
- 8:43and the prices of
- 8:45homes will in real terms will continue
- 8:49to decline
- 8:51uh
- 8:51and
- 8:52governments will just aggravate that
- 8:54process. I'm sorry to be so pessimistic,
- 8:57but
- 8:58we need to be realistic if we're to
- 9:03somehow force governments to make the
- 9:06changes
- 9:08that rehabilitate our communities,
- 9:11restore the vitality.
- 9:13>> Mhm.
- 9:14>> And at present, as we've seen with the
- 9:17latest
- 9:18British budget that was published this
- 9:20week, uh governments do not have a clue
- 9:24as to the realities or what to do about
- 9:27them. And
- 9:29that that is one of the existential
- 9:33threats against humanity. Political
- 9:36paralysis. They just don't know
- 9:39what's happening
- 9:41and how to deal with it.
- 9:43Uh
- 9:44and only
- 9:45if people
- 9:48confronted with the reality of house
- 9:50prices
- 9:51insist on a new approach, a new clarity
- 9:56about the future
- 9:59which could be great
- 10:01uh if we knew what we were doing and if
- 10:03we took control of that future
- 10:06or it could be really bad. And it's only
- 10:08if people take insist on taking control,
- 10:12will
- 10:13politicians
- 10:15begin to be realistic.
- 10:17>> Just to just just to put in a nutshell
- 10:19what you've you've said
- 10:21and see if I've got it understood right.
- 10:24We we live in a world where these
- 10:27economic rents that are created are one
- 10:30big pool. And it they go to the biggest
- 10:33monopoly. At the moment, the biggest
- 10:35monopoly has been the land under our
- 10:37feet.
- 10:38After the industrial where workers
- 10:40lived, where their offices were.
- 10:42Previously, it was the agricultural land
- 10:45that produced our food. That was the
- 10:46biggest monopoly.
- 10:48And now we're entering this new digital
- 10:51age of very smart technology.
- 10:55It's going to move to that technology.
- 10:57And all this massive trillion-dollar
- 11:00speculations
- 11:02is trying to own that monopoly in the
- 11:04future. And the pie is only so big. And
- 11:08that means the money from our house
- 11:11prices, our land values, our business
- 11:13locations is going to move to these huge
- 11:17technology companies that can
- 11:19successfully
- 11:20create
- 11:22a monopoly of some description. Um those
- 11:26monopolies, you can see them fighting
- 11:28out. Musk trying to own this near Earth
- 11:31orbit as you say.
- 11:32Technology companies wanting regulation
- 11:35cuz they want to ban competition of
- 11:38their newly created AI. So you they're
- 11:41all fighting not for productivity, but
- 11:45for this monopoly
- 11:47rent income. And
- 11:50your beautiful solution, of course, is
- 11:52instead of taxing our wages and our
- 11:54investments, you tax that monopoly
- 11:57value,
- 11:58which reduces the cost, the damage they
- 12:01do, and gives us all the public services
- 12:03we want.
- 12:05>> Yeah. If from the beginning, governments
- 12:08had said
- 12:10to those who were
- 12:12at the leading edge of AI technology
- 12:16Well, this is going to be wonderful, a
- 12:18new asset for humanity.
- 12:21But, we've got to do it responsibly.
- 12:24Now, you want to use this spectrum.
- 12:28Without the spectrum, your new
- 12:30technology is worth bugger all.
- 12:34We are going to be collecting the rents
- 12:37of the highways down which you transmit
- 12:40the data.
- 12:43Which means that there will not be a
- 12:45huge boom in prices of tech barons'
- 12:50properties.
- 12:51It will be done incrementally,
- 12:54responsibly.
- 12:56With people keeping control of what's
- 12:58happening.
- 13:00They didn't do that. They just left the
- 13:03tech barons to collect
- 13:05the rents that were
- 13:08going to be gravitating
- 13:10out of
- 13:12human communities into the metaverse
- 13:16communities.
- 13:18That's why we have ended up with these
- 13:21tech guys issuing these terrible
- 13:25warnings about the prospects of AI
- 13:30killing off humanity. They're scaring
- 13:32us.
- 13:33Now, why are they doing that? Why are
- 13:35they saying governments should regulate
- 13:37us?
- 13:38They are transferring responsibility for
- 13:41what they are doing onto others.
- 13:45They're saying governments must regulate
- 13:47us to prevent the possibility of our
- 13:50robots destroying humanity. Well, hang
- 13:53on.
- 13:54It's your technology. You're responsible
- 13:57for what might happen.
- 14:00You will pay the price. But, no, they
- 14:02don't want that because, you see, the
- 14:05only way to take control of the new
- 14:08technology is by controlling
- 14:12the routes through which they transmit
- 14:15the data.
- 14:17How is it controlled? Only if people had
- 14:20to pay
- 14:22uh the rents
- 14:24uh
- 14:26that accumulate on the highways
- 14:30the
- 14:31the the cables crossing the oceans and
- 14:35the
- 14:36uh spectrum highways, will sanity
- 14:40prevail?
- 14:41Think about what might have happened
- 14:43with
- 14:46uh the new generation that's now
- 14:49effectively lost. They spend all their
- 14:51time gawking at their phones
- 14:55uh and they're they are beginning to
- 14:58lose their minds. There's an erosion of
- 15:01their capacity to think critically.
- 15:06If the parents had to pay the full rents
- 15:11uh that were being used
- 15:14by their kids on their smartphones, they
- 15:18would clamp down on it. They would say,
- 15:20"We can't afford you to spend 8 hours
- 15:23gawking at the telephone because we're
- 15:26paying the uh the rents that are
- 15:28clocking up every minute." Oh, so now
- 15:32the children's
- 15:34time spent on their phones would be
- 15:36controlled by responsible parental
- 15:39behavior.
- 15:41But that's not happened
- 15:43because
- 15:45the rents are being
- 15:48accumulated by the
- 15:51the tech barons and there is no ultimate
- 15:56responsibility
- 15:58which they the tech industry is trying
- 16:01to shift onto others as a way of
- 16:04avoiding any discussion on how sanity
- 16:08can be brought to prevail in the AI
- 16:12industry.
- 16:14So it's a con, this "We want governments
- 16:17to regulate us." It's their way of
- 16:19shifting the debate away from themselves
- 16:23and onto the regulations, which
- 16:25ultimately don't work. Uh and if they
- 16:28don't if if they if there are failures,
- 16:31we we blame the government, not the tech
- 16:33barons.
- 16:35>> Mhm.
- 16:36One of the things we were discussing
- 16:37earlier was
- 16:39the the new AI engines, not the public
- 16:43ones we get to use chat GPT and tropic
- 16:46and that. But the the the darker AI
- 16:50engines of Palantir.
- 16:53Um they are starting to be able to
- 16:56understand and manipulate humans.
- 16:59Governments are paying a fortune for
- 17:00them. Militaries are using them to
- 17:02predict, you know, battlefield behavior
- 17:05and social behavior.
- 17:08If we if we took the rents of that, how
- 17:11do we control that asymmetry of
- 17:14information between powerful and
- 17:17unpowerful people?
- 17:19>> Well,
- 17:20ultimately, the only way we're going to
- 17:22get the shift in the way governments
- 17:24raise their revenue is if
- 17:27we we we redefine the that concept of
- 17:31personal responsibility.
- 17:34Put personal and social responsibility.
- 17:38And at the moment in our society,
- 17:41we are a completely irresponsible
- 17:45society.
- 17:46It's an inhuman society.
- 17:49When I watch the television news on how
- 17:53the barbarians in Krem- in the Kremlin
- 17:56are sending drones to smash
- 18:00uh
- 18:01family apartments, this is not human
- 18:04behavior.
- 18:06Uh
- 18:06how did we get to this state of affairs?
- 18:10We need to re-
- 18:14re-understand
- 18:16the nature of personal
- 18:19and social responsibilities.
- 18:21Once we start talking in those terms, we
- 18:25now are able to evaluate
- 18:28uh
- 18:29what is acceptable.
- 18:31At the moment, we're accepting
- 18:34uh the prospect of using
- 18:37uh
- 18:38hu- robots to kill people in place of
- 18:41soldiers, so that soldiers don't die on
- 18:44the battlefield. Let's send the robots
- 18:46in doing it. And we're accepting that.
- 18:49But this is it inhuman.
- 18:52So, there needs to be a global
- 18:55revolution in what it means to be human
- 18:58being. Mhm. It's astonishing, but
- 19:02it really boils down to
- 19:05that fundamental issue. What does it
- 19:07mean to be human?
- 19:10And if we can arrive at a agreement on
- 19:14what it means to be human, which means
- 19:17being res- but held accountable for our
- 19:20behavior,
- 19:22then
- 19:23everything changes.
- 19:25Uh
- 19:26and the kind of stuff that you just
- 19:29referred to would not be tolerated.
- 19:31>> Mhm.
- 19:32>> It would be outlawed on a global scale,
- 19:35and those who abused the power of this
- 19:39technology would just be ostracized.
- 19:42But instead of that happening, what are
- 19:44we seeing now?
- 19:46The president of America
- 19:48is
- 19:49doing deals with the
- 19:51the criminal in the Kremlin
- 19:54uh
- 19:55for oil rents, which he wants to attract
- 19:58into America,
- 19:59which licenses
- 20:02the barbarians in Russia
- 20:04to continue behaving in
- 20:06an irrespons- an inhuman, irresponsible
- 20:10way.
- 20:11In fact, uh one of the president's uh
- 20:14diplomats calls
- 20:16Putin a humanitarian.
- 20:19That's his concept
- 20:21uh of huma- humanism.
- 20:24>> Mhm.
- 20:24>> The barbarian that's using drones to
- 20:28murder,
- 20:29uh, mothers and children in Ukraine.
- 20:34It's
- 20:36we go on about the need to change the
- 20:38fiscal system,
- 20:40but fundamentally, we have to begin to
- 20:43rethink what what it means to be a human
- 20:46being.
- 20:47>> Absolutely.
- 20:50Economic rents,
- 20:52they're available to be privatized.
- 20:55So, on every level, our politicians,
- 20:58um, Trump and others, they can make
- 21:02billions of dollars through this ability
- 21:05to privatize oil
- 21:07mineral wealth or land. But, every
- 21:10strata of us, we we can make a lot of
- 21:13money by getting a hold of these
- 21:15economic rents. If they weren't
- 21:17available, there would be no incentive
- 21:19for people to behave in these despicable
- 21:21manners.
- 21:23So, it's a chicken and egg. How do we
- 21:25get round the problem that the people
- 21:28who do terrible things are rewarded?
- 21:31And the society, if there was no reward,
- 21:35there wouldn't be the incentive for them
- 21:37to do these terrible things.
- 21:39So, how are we going to crack that
- 21:42problem because their wealth stops us
- 21:45from changing the system?
- 21:46>> Well,
- 21:49nothing's going to stop humans producing
- 21:52the net income, the the rents. That's an
- 21:56automatic
- 21:57part of what it means to be human.
- 22:00[snorts]
- 22:01Uh,
- 22:02we now behave in an inhuman way because
- 22:06we've all individually lost control
- 22:10over [clears throat]
- 22:12that energy, the what which is what
- 22:16rents represent, the human energy that
- 22:20we all pull to create the energy to make
- 22:24us what we are.
- 22:26In
- 22:28in the evolutionary period,
- 22:31every individual in what were small
- 22:34communities made sure that there was no
- 22:37cheating.
- 22:38>> Mhm.
- 22:38>> They could intervene personally and say,
- 22:41"Come off it. You're you're not playing
- 22:43by the rules of the game. Stop
- 22:46cheating." And anybody who tried to
- 22:48cheat would be put to shame. But we lost
- 22:52the personal involvement
- 22:55uh
- 22:56once we gravitated to the agricultural
- 23:00revolution, because now we built urban
- 23:03areas and we lost contact with the
- 23:06people who were representing us.
- 23:09We can't blame people back then for not
- 23:12knowing how to control their destiny.
- 23:16Uh and at the beginning of the
- 23:19Industrial Revolution, there wasn't a
- 23:22clear uh understanding of what it would
- 23:25take.
- 23:27If we all understood that we all have a
- 23:32share of this net income, it belongs to
- 23:36all of us. And if we collected this uh
- 23:39all for the public good, and if we held
- 23:42our representatives accountable for
- 23:46their behavior in in a way that we don't
- 23:49do now,
- 23:51uh
- 23:53then things will go wrong. But by
- 23:56coming to understand that each and every
- 23:59one of us has a share in ownership and
- 24:04responsibility for this net income, this
- 24:08rent,
- 24:10and that we are personally involved in
- 24:13how those rents are spent,
- 24:16then we would be very active in making
- 24:19sure that the people we appoint to
- 24:22represent us
- 24:24are held accountable if they misbehave.
- 24:28We don't do that now because we've just
- 24:31separated
- 24:33ourselves from
- 24:35that stream of value which we now think
- 24:39actually just belongs to those who have
- 24:42who own property rights.
- 24:44>> Mhm.
- 24:44>> So,
- 24:45and during during the last 50 years
- 24:48since Margaret Thatcher,
- 24:51those of us who own homes think, "Oh,
- 24:54these rents in the form of capital gains
- 24:56to our homes belong to us. It's our
- 24:58property." Well, no the bloody hell it's
- 25:01not true.
- 25:04That that those capital gains from the
- 25:06location values is the property of
- 25:10everybody in the community.
- 25:14But we don't understand that, which is
- 25:16why
- 25:19we continue with the absurd politics
- 25:23and economics that we have today.
- 25:26>> Mhm.
- 25:26>> And it's only by coming to
- 25:29terms with the fact that
- 25:31actually we all own rents, we are all
- 25:35responsible for how it's spent,
- 25:38that we need to be involved,
- 25:41uh hold the people who actually spend
- 25:46those rents on our behalf are held
- 25:48accountable for what they do. Only then
- 25:53will we
- 25:54impose the discipline
- 25:57uh that leads to us having the free
- 26:00choices on how to live our lives.
- 26:04So,
- 26:06the conclude One of the conclusions we
- 26:08reach is that
- 26:09a home should be a home for a family
- 26:13providing security and stability for
- 26:17every family in the land, not just for
- 26:19those who happen to be privileged to own
- 26:22the title deeds to the location where
- 26:25their houses are standing.
- 26:31A home is not a financial asset.
- 26:35It is the the
- 26:39habitation, the
- 26:42physical representation of the security
- 26:47and stability
- 26:48that a family needs with children
- 26:50growing up, with
- 26:53grandparents growing old. It should be a
- 26:56a place of security,
- 26:59not financial gain. And if if we can
- 27:04come to terms with the change in viewing
- 27:08this asset
- 27:10as a place
- 27:13for human beings to live in
- 27:15in a secure way, rather than to make
- 27:18money,
- 27:20then we would be free to go and make
- 27:23money in those commercial activities
- 27:27that actually add value to the
- 27:30uh
- 27:30welfare of the community, where we can
- 27:33make profits that are not taxed.
- 27:37Because we are pooling the location
- 27:40values where we choose to live uh into
- 27:44the public purse
- 27:46for the benefit of the whole community.
- 27:49>> Absolutely, Fred. We are We are living
- 27:53in a world of cheats and thieves and one
- 27:56thief is stealing from the other. And
- 28:00the only way we can solve it is by
- 28:02socializing the economic rent, the
- 28:05profits the thieves search for.
- 28:07>> Exactly. Exactly. So, the cheating that
- 28:10began in antiquity, when people didn't
- 28:13understand
- 28:15and they didn't have the knowledge or
- 28:17the institutions
- 28:18to block the cheating, we now have the
- 28:21knowledge and the institutions where we
- 28:24can make sure that with the digital
- 28:27revolution,
- 28:28there will be no more cheating.
- 28:31Because if we allow the cheating to
- 28:34continue into the digital age, it will
- 28:38be the robots knocking on our doors. We
- 28:41will lose our homes, many of us
- 28:44literally.
- 28:45Uh and we only have our ourselves to
- 28:48blame.
- 28:50>> Mhm.
- 28:51Well, on a dark note,
- 28:54let's tell everybody to get active
- 28:57activating the consciousness. Talk to
- 29:00friends, develop a knowledge of these
- 29:05cheaters and AI,
- 29:07and
- 29:09there is a solution to the world's
- 29:11problems.
- 29:12Yep. Thanks for that.
- 29:14>> Thank you, Peter.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The Man Who Called the Last Two Crashes Says Your House Price Won’t Recover After This One by Fred Harrison, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,268 words across 654 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.