The Interrogation of Stephanie Lazarus — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00The detectives created a ruse, inviting
- 0:02Stephanie to come in and advise them on
- 0:04a case involving stolen art. Knowing
- 0:06they were dealing with one of their own,
- 0:08they rehearsed and prepared for the
- 0:09interview more than anything they had
- 0:11done before. Their plan of attack was to
- 0:13keep the conversation as casual as
- 0:15possible for as long as possible and
- 0:17carefully waited for the key moments to
- 0:19initiate the confrontation.
- 0:20Stephanie, I don't know if you know my
- 0:21partner. Hey, great. Hi, sir. Nice to
- 0:23meet you. Nice to see you guys. How's it
- 0:24going? Milling around. Uh, well, have a
- 0:28seat.
- 0:30I don't want to talk about this in the
- 0:31squadron because I don't know who people
- 0:32are listening. And if we go to my side,
- 0:35everybody's always wondering what
- 0:36everybody else is doing. No problem.
- 0:37Okay.
- 0:38The first thing the detectives do is set
- 0:39up a compatible tone with a suspect. She
- 0:42has just stepped foot inside an
- 0:43interrogation room, and the detectives
- 0:45negate the negative implications of such
- 0:47an environment through a friendly
- 0:48disposition. Consultative meetings, such
- 0:51as seeking advice over an art theft, can
- 0:53take place anywhere, and the last place
- 0:55detectives would choose to spend more
- 0:57time in would be an interrogation room.
- 0:59The reason they give the suspect for
- 1:00meeting in such an unusual location is
- 1:03to not spread rumors or innuendo. Yet,
- 1:05the real reason is that all firearms
- 1:07have to be checked in before entering
- 1:09the area, and they needed the suspect to
- 1:11give up her gun without alerting
- 1:12suspicion.
- 1:14But, uh, like we're talking about being
- 1:16busy and stuff, we've been assigned a
- 1:17case that we've been looking at. Okay,
- 1:19it's a new case and revealing the case.
- 1:21There's some notes uh to see as far as
- 1:24your name being mentioned. Okay.
- 1:26Do you know John Ruten?
- 1:27Try and imagine for one moment that you
- 1:29savagely murdered a love rival in a
- 1:31jealous rage. Over two decades had
- 1:33passed since the act. Then all of a
- 1:35sudden, you're brought to an
- 1:36interrogation room and sat directly
- 1:38opposite two senior investigators who
- 1:40bring up the name of the man you
- 1:42committed first-degree homicide for.
- 1:44John Brutin.
- 1:47John Rutton.
- 1:48Rutton.
- 1:49The investigators already knew how to
- 1:51say John Rutton's name correctly. The
- 1:53mispronunciation was a simple strategy
- 1:55to see how the suspect would react.
- 1:57Setting aside the element of the murder,
- 1:59John Rutton was the second longest
- 2:01relationship in Stephanie's life. And a
- 2:03psychiatrist later stated that this
- 2:04pause was four times as long as it
- 2:06should have been. She was already being
- 2:08deceptive by acting as if she hadn't
- 2:10thought about that name for so long,
- 2:12giving reason for her prolonged
- 2:13reflection, when in reality, the name
- 2:15John Rutton was engraved in her memory.
- 2:17And even when slightly mispronounced, it
- 2:19would have most likely taken
- 2:20milliseconds for her to realize exactly
- 2:22who the detectives were referring to.
- 2:25Oh, yeah. I went to school with him.
- 2:26You did?
- 2:26Yeah.
- 2:27How long did you know him?
- 2:28Gosh, I went to school in um let's see,
- 2:31went to UCLA 1978.
- 2:34They started and um you know met him at
- 2:39school at the dorms.
- 2:40Mhm.
- 2:41Um
- 2:42she says she met him in the dorms yet
- 2:44left out the fact that they had dated
- 2:46for 4 years and went on numerous
- 2:48holidays together even though she wasn't
- 2:50asked directly. A truthful subject would
- 2:52most often volunteer this information
- 2:54without having to be pressed for it.
- 2:56Were you guys friends? Close friends?
- 2:58Yeah, we're very close friends. I mean I
- 3:00mean what's this all about?
- 3:01Well, it's regarding it's a case we're
- 3:03working on. And it involves John and in
- 3:05there some of the statements we we
- 3:07reviewed uh you know there's notes and
- 3:09stuff that that he knew you and stuff.
- 3:10Oh yeah. I mean we good friends um lived
- 3:14in the dorms for I lived in the dorms
- 3:16for 2 years. Um
- 3:18you guys lived in the same dorms?
- 3:19Yeah.
- 3:20Oh okay.
- 3:20Yeah. Dyra.
- 3:21Okay. Were you guys just friends or
- 3:23anything else or?
- 3:24Yeah we were we were good friends.
- 3:27Yeah. Was there any relationship or
- 3:29anything that developed between you
- 3:30guys?
- 3:31Yeah. I mean we dated.
- 3:33Uh-huh.
- 3:33You know, um I mean is what's this all
- 3:36about?
- 3:37Well, it's relating to uh his wife.
- 3:41It's unfortunate that Stephanie's face
- 3:42wasn't captured at this moment because
- 3:44she would have no doubt been immediately
- 3:46struck by the psychological reaction
- 3:48known as fight or flight. Her brain
- 3:50would have just triggered the influx of
- 3:51a specific cocktail of hormones in order
- 3:54to prepare her to either stay and deal
- 3:56with a threat or try and run away to
- 3:58safety. Stephanie chooses to fight.
- 4:01Okay. Okay. Did you know her?
- 4:04Not really. I mean, I knew that he got
- 4:05married years ago.
- 4:07Uh-huh. Did you ever meet her?
- 4:09God, I don't know. Um,
- 4:11do you know who she was or anything?
- 4:13Well, I Let me think. God, it's been a
- 4:16long time ago. Um
- 4:19Um,
- 4:20you know, I may have met her. Um, jeez.
- 4:24The words gosh, God, G are exclamatory
- 4:28remarks used to express surprise or
- 4:30strong emotion. You will see them used
- 4:32continuously throughout this
- 4:33interrogation, which is the suspect
- 4:35trying to insinuate a vague memory due
- 4:38to a lack of contemplation on the
- 4:39subject matter. She's trying to emit the
- 4:41impression that she would have had no
- 4:43reason to give any further thought to
- 4:44Jon or anything related to Jon since
- 4:47they stopped seeing each other over two
- 4:48decades ago.
- 4:50No.
- 4:51Yeah. Uh well, let me see. Let me ask
- 4:53you. You said you you dated John. How
- 4:55long did you guys date?
- 4:58I mean, what are you guys is this
- 5:01something?
- 5:01As we know, Stephanie is a cop and has
- 5:04been for 25 years. She will be wise to
- 5:06the fact that acting oblivious to the
- 5:08unusual development of the situation
- 5:10will be a glaring red flag in the eyes
- 5:12of the investigators. It's been shown
- 5:13time and again on this channel. Guilty
- 5:15suspects will often try and act naive to
- 5:18a blatant confrontation as a means to
- 5:20avoiding it altogether. Whereas truthful
- 5:22subjects will address the confrontation
- 5:24and either refute it or if it's subtle
- 5:26want immediate clarification and
- 5:28transparency as to what was being
- 5:30insinuated. I mean, you said that I was
- 5:32going to interview somebody about art
- 5:33and how you guys are.
- 5:34Here's I mean,
- 5:36Stephanie, here's the situation is
- 5:37basically we, you know, we knew that
- 5:40this when we saw this in the in in this
- 5:43chrono that maybe, you know, there was
- 5:44some relationship there. That's what the
- 5:45chronos seem to indicate.
- 5:46The detective now subtly avoids the
- 5:48question altogether, but instead offers
- 5:50a deceptively reassuring response to the
- 5:52suspect. He makes a very sharp switch
- 5:54from the investigative subject matter to
- 5:56the previous topic of workplace rumors.
- 5:58He brings her focus back to the false
- 6:00perception of them being on her side.
- 6:02Stephanie had just asked what was going
- 6:04on. And now he essentially replies with,
- 6:07"We are your friends. We're doing you a
- 6:09favor."
- 6:09And we didn't want to come up to you at
- 6:12your desk and ask those kinds of
- 6:13questions or do anything. You know how
- 6:15up there people can see what's going on
- 6:16if you go into an interview room or
- 6:18people are in there getting supplies. So
- 6:20we wanted to privac
- 6:31someone, you know, we don't want the
- 6:32rumor mill or gossip or any of that kind
- 6:33of stuff.
- 6:34That's fine. I mean,
- 6:35so we we did this just as as a means to
- 6:37try and speak to you in just a
- 6:38confidential place where you, you know,
- 6:40where where your business isn't out
- 6:42there for other people, you know, your
- 6:43division to know about. Whether it be
- 6:45shock or the total reluctance to accept
- 6:47the situation at hand, Stephanie wearily
- 6:49accepts the reassuring response without
- 6:52further inquiry into her initial
- 6:53challenge. She instead falls back into
- 6:55her agenda of having a foggy memory with
- 6:58regard to the incriminating contents.
- 7:00You know, God, that's been a million
- 7:01years ago. I mean, you know, um
- 7:06what year is it now? 2009. I mean, I
- 7:08graduated in ' 82. 82. Yeah. Um,
- 7:13you know, we dated. Um, I dated other
- 7:16guys. I'm sure he dated other girls. Um,
- 7:20well, let me ask you roughly how long
- 7:22would you would you say you guys dated?
- 7:24Oh, jeez. Um,
- 7:27I couldn't even say. I mean,
- 7:29notice how she now goes on to overexlain
- 7:32things that don't require an explanation
- 7:34and weren't even inquired about. It's a
- 7:36clear-cut indication of hyperarousal and
- 7:38a derivative of TMT, also known as
- 7:41terror management theory. The suspect
- 7:43will go off on unrelated tangents as
- 7:45means for gaining momentary relief.
- 7:47Going into detail about trivial things
- 7:49affords her a brief escape from the
- 7:51terrifying reality eventuating before
- 7:53her. This is a very common occurrence in
- 7:55interrogations where the suspect is
- 7:57facing serious charges and psychiatrists
- 8:00believe it to be a subconscious coping
- 8:01mechanism.
- 8:02I started school there in 78. Mhm.
- 8:05I started UCLA set in 1978.
- 8:07I graduated in ' 82. Um I don't even
- 8:11remember what year he graduated if it
- 8:13was a year or two before me.
- 8:15Okay.
- 8:16Um I think he was a little bit older
- 8:17than I was.
- 8:18I mean, you know, I can't remember if he
- 8:20was born, let's say, I'm born in 60,
- 8:221960. I don't know if he was born in 58
- 8:25or 59. I mean, you know, um I mean, I
- 8:27knew his parents. I knew his sister. His
- 8:29brother went to Northridge. Um
- 8:33um you know, sister spent the night at
- 8:35my house before. Obviously, I spent the
- 8:38night at his house before. He probably
- 8:39spent the night at my house before. Um
- 8:42you know, I've you know, I don't
- 8:45Well, correct me if I'm wrong, cuz from
- 8:47what you're telling me is you guys dated
- 8:49while you were in college together,
- 8:50right?
- 8:51Yeah. And probably after college. Um I'm
- 8:54I can't jeez. Um trying to think when I
- 8:57met my husband. And I met my husband in
- 9:00when did I meet Scott? Um,
- 9:03let's see. I was teaching DARE cuz I met
- 9:06Scott when I was teaching DARE up in
- 9:08Oregon. But we had long stopped, you
- 9:11know, dating before that.
- 9:13So, you haven't talked to him for a long
- 9:15time.
- 9:15Oh, I I think I haven't talked to him in
- 9:17a long time. Um, I couldn't even tell
- 9:19you when the last time I talked to him.
- 9:21Um, I met Scott I'm thinking in ' 92,
- 9:25maybe. Um, April of 92. It was
- 9:29Scott being your husband.
- 9:30Yeah. I'm trying to think. I was
- 9:31teaching Dare. Let's see what year is
- 9:34this. This is We'll be married. I got
- 9:37married in 1996. I think I met Scott in
- 9:39'92. Prior to that, I couldn't tell you
- 9:42how long I had talked, you know, talked
- 9:44to John prior to that.
- 9:46But since you since you met your
- 9:48husband, Scott, you hadn't talked to
- 9:49him? I mean, he may have called me uh
- 9:53once or twice before we got married,
- 9:56right?
- 9:56Um, you know, gez, I I lived I moved to
- 10:00see me
- 10:01in 1994 because I lost my house in the
- 10:04earthquake.
- 10:04Oh.
- 10:05Um, uh, quite honestly, I probably keep
- 10:08in contact with a few people from the
- 10:11dorms. We we all we all lived on the
- 10:1310th floor. Um, and um,
- 10:18there's
- 10:22about three or four people I keep in
- 10:24contact with. There's probably like six
- 10:25or eight of us that were all really
- 10:27close.
- 10:27Mhm. And who are those people?
- 10:29Oh jeez. Um, Diana Basta,
- 10:33um, people I still keep I I haven't been
- 10:36in contact with her in a long time.
- 10:39Um, I mean, what, you know, what's
- 10:42what's I mean, what's this all about?
- 10:43What I mean?
- 10:44Well, let me ask you that.
- 10:45The suspect challenges the detectives
- 10:47for the second time and once again the
- 10:50question is avoided, but this time in a
- 10:52more confrontational manner as the topic
- 10:54is maintained with no reassurance
- 10:56afforded. The detectives are ramping up
- 10:57the pressure in a very subtle yet highly
- 11:00effective manner.
- 11:00What ended the relationship between you
- 11:02and John?
- 11:04You know, I don't It was kind of a weird
- 11:07relationship. I mean, we we we dated. Um
- 11:10I can't say that he was my boyfriend.
- 11:12And I don't know that he would have
- 11:13considered me his girlfriend. Um, we
- 11:16just we dated, we did things. I played
- 11:18sports in college. He played basketball.
- 11:20His brother played basketball. Um,
- 11:24we just, you know, it just
- 11:27didn't work out. I mean, I don't know
- 11:29what to tell you. It was like I went out
- 11:31with other guys. Um, saw other guys. I
- 11:34went on lots of vacations. Um, you know,
- 11:37and and once you guys split, were you
- 11:39guys still friends or kind of uh you
- 11:42know, problems. Is it
- 11:44friendly? Not friendly?
- 11:46No, I don't think it was not friendly. I
- 11:48mean, we were friendly. Um, uh, I know
- 11:50that
- 11:51we went to Hawaii,
- 11:53um, at one point. Yeah. I mean, I, you
- 11:57know,
- 11:58and you were saying that, um,
- 12:00it's 2009 now.
- 12:01Had you ever met his wife?
- 12:04I may have.
- 12:05Do you know, do you remember her name or
- 12:07anything or
- 12:09um
- 12:12um
- 12:14or what she did for a living or where
- 12:16she worked or anything about her.
- 12:19The suspect was just asked three
- 12:20consecutive questions relating to the
- 12:22victim. She was supposedly in a
- 12:24reflective state during all three of the
- 12:26questions, yet her facial expression
- 12:28completely changed for the third one.
- 12:29This is because she was pretending to be
- 12:31in a state of reflection for the first
- 12:33two questions as she already knew the
- 12:35answers. Whereas for the third question,
- 12:37she actually was in a state of
- 12:38reflection and was genuinely searching
- 12:40her memory for the correct response.
- 12:43Had you ever met his wife?
- 12:45I may have. Do you know do you remember
- 12:47her name or anything or
- 12:50um
- 12:53um
- 12:55the third question is about to be posed
- 12:57and her focus is about to switch from
- 12:59pretending to be thinking to actually
- 13:01thinking
- 13:01for what she did for a living or where
- 13:03she worked or anything about her.
- 13:06Well, I think she I I'm going to say I
- 13:08think she was a nurse. Um
- 13:12man, I can't even remember how he he
- 13:13said he met her. Uh, yeah. I mean, I I
- 13:16Yeah, I mean, it's been so long ago.
- 13:18Well, let me ask you, did you go to
- 13:19their wedding? You know,
- 13:21no, I didn't go to their wedding. Um,
- 13:23no, I don't did not go to their wedding.
- 13:26Um, couldn't even tell you what year we
- 13:28got married. I mean, you know, it's it's
- 13:30been a million years ago. You know,
- 13:32again, I I mean, what you know, I don't
- 13:35understand why you're talking about some
- 13:37guy I dated a million years ago.
- 13:38Well, do you know what happened to his
- 13:40wife?
- 13:40Yeah, I know she got killed. You
- 13:42wouldn't need to be an expert in body
- 13:44language to recognize the unmititigated
- 13:46terror emanating from the suspect's face
- 13:48at this moment. She had just verbalized
- 13:50the victim's tragic demise for the first
- 13:52time in most likely over two decades.
- 13:55What did you What did you hear about
- 13:56that?
- 13:57I I saw a poster at work. Um I'm sure I
- 14:01spoke to him about it. Um I think I
- 14:04spoke to another friend of his about it.
- 14:07Um
- 14:08and how did how did you first learn
- 14:09about that?
- 14:11Jeez.
- 14:13Someone could have called me. I could
- 14:15have heard it at work. Um
- 14:18I think at one point there may have been
- 14:19a flyer or something. I know a good
- 14:21friend of his. Um
- 14:22Were you on the job back then when that
- 14:24happened?
- 14:25Yeah, I think so. Yeah, I'm sure I was
- 14:27on the job. That's who I would have
- 14:28heard about it with the flyer. Um he had
- 14:31a good friend Mike
- 14:33Baldrick. Mike.
- 14:37Um
- 14:39um you know,
- 14:40but being that you were kind of you used
- 14:42to see uh John, you know, was it
- 14:46everything okay between you guys? I
- 14:47mean, there was never anything
- 14:48uncomfortable or anything between you
- 14:50and her.
- 14:51Um
- 14:53eight separate witnesses testified that
- 14:55Stephanie had confronted Sherry at the
- 14:57hospital she worked at, while the two of
- 14:58them were reportedly in an intimate
- 15:00relationship with Jon. The confrontation
- 15:02was said to have been highly aggressive
- 15:04and Stephanie had to be escorted off the
- 15:06premises by security. Reports stated
- 15:08that Stephanie was by far the more
- 15:10combative and even made threats against
- 15:12Sherry's life. You know, I don't know. I
- 15:15mean, it's God, it's been so many years.
- 15:16I mean,
- 15:18uncomfortable. I mean,
- 15:22I can't even I can't even remember if we
- 15:24had a conversation. I mean, we may have
- 15:26I may have I may have seen her at his
- 15:29apartment, you know.
- 15:31Jeez, how many years ago is that? I
- 15:33don't even know what year she, you know,
- 15:34got killed.
- 15:35Where was his apartment?
- 15:36Notice her passive disposition as she
- 15:38gives the following truthful response
- 15:41on Rosco.
- 15:42Okay.
- 15:42Yeah, Rosco and um um
- 15:47east or west of Dot. Uh either east or
- 15:50west of Dodto. Do you know where he
- 15:52moved after did he move after he got
- 15:54married? Or do you know or
- 15:55Now notice how her disposition switches
- 15:57from passive to frantic as she once
- 15:59again pretends to have a vague memory.
- 16:06I'm sure he did.
- 16:07Did you know where he was living or
- 16:10somewhere in the valley?
- 16:12Did you ever visit him and his wife?
- 16:15No.
- 16:15No. Never went out, you know, get
- 16:17together, dinners,
- 16:19anything of that nature?
- 16:20No. No. Like I said, his sister used to
- 16:23come over. His sister had had come to my
- 16:26place. I knew his I knew his brother
- 16:28because his brother played basketball at
- 16:29Northridge. Um in fact, I was just
- 16:31coming across some pictures that I just
- 16:33scan
- 16:35uh scanned from um I take a lot of
- 16:38photos.
- 16:39Um like 10,000. And I just did a service
- 16:43where I scanned everything.
- 16:47And uh after his wife died, did did you
- 16:51talk to him again or or anything?
- 16:53Yeah, I mean I did talk to him.
- 16:55Mhm.
- 16:55I talked to him, probably his parents.
- 16:58Um probably some other friends. Um you
- 17:02know,
- 17:03I'm sure I talked to him.
- 17:05Yeah.
- 17:06Um
- 17:06but you you don't you're not sure where
- 17:08he moved to after he got married?
- 17:10No idea. I mean,
- 17:11never went over to to visit him or
- 17:13I don't think I mean I don't think so. I
- 17:15mean um I don't know. I don't I mean I
- 17:19don't think I did. Um I mean I know he
- 17:22lived on Rosco for a long long time. Um
- 17:30and you're right.
- 17:31I mean if you guys are claiming that I'm
- 17:33a suspect then you know I I got a
- 17:35problem with you know with that.
- 17:37Okay.
- 17:37Okay. So you know if you're if you're
- 17:41doing this as an interrogation you're
- 17:42saying hey I'm a suspect. Well, now I
- 17:45got a problem with, you know, now you're
- 17:46accusing me of this. Is that what you're
- 17:49Is that what you're saying?
- 17:50We're trying to figure out what
- 17:51happened, Stephanie.
- 17:53Well, I'm I was, you know, I'm just
- 17:55saying,
- 17:57you know, would I need to get a lawyer
- 17:59if you're accusing me of,
- 18:01you know,
- 18:01you don't have to I mean, you know,
- 18:03you're here of your own free will. I
- 18:04mean,
- 18:05Well, I know, but I mean,
- 18:06you know, you're not you're not under
- 18:06arrest. You can walk out when
- 18:08you can leave whenever you like. Well,
- 18:10you know, I I'm trying to give you some
- 18:11background of, you know, how I knew him
- 18:14and now you're telling me that some
- 18:16somebody's saying that we had this big
- 18:18old fight and I don't even know what
- 18:19you're talking about. Um, you know, and
- 18:21I don't want to, you know, get in
- 18:23trouble for something that I didn't even
- 18:24do or you're saying I did something.
- 18:27Okay,
- 18:28we understand.
- 18:29I mean, how would you guys like it if
- 18:31the tables were turned on you?
- 18:32I understand. No,
- 18:34that's what we're telling you. I mean,
- 18:35you're free to go whenever you want. If
- 18:36if this makes you uncomfortable and you
- 18:37want to
- 18:38now you're starting to make me
- 18:39uncomfortable.
- 18:41The thing is I mean detectives did what
- 18:43they could at that time on the crime
- 18:44scene. Okay. And the burglary thing
- 18:46you're talking about that is an angle
- 18:47that they looked at. I go but now we're
- 18:49looking at everything else on the case
- 18:51cuz nobody was ever arrested on the
- 18:52case.
- 18:53I I don't know that or not.
- 18:56Okay. Now what we'd like to do is
- 19:00obviously you know about all the DNA
- 19:01stuff and things of the nature that you
- 19:03know gets done on cases nowadays. You
- 19:06know, if we asked you for a DNA swab,
- 19:08would you be willing to give us one?
- 19:10Maybe
- 19:11because now now
- 19:14I'm thinking I probably need to talk to
- 19:16a lawyer.
- 19:17Okay.
- 19:18I mean,
- 19:19well,
- 19:20I cuz I know how this stuff works. Okay,
- 19:21don't get me wrong. You're right. I have
- 19:23been doing this a long time and and I
- 19:24wish I had been recording this because
- 19:26because now it sounds like, you know,
- 19:28there's, you know, you're selling these
- 19:31people saying I'm a fighting with her
- 19:32and now it sounds like you're trying to,
- 19:34you know, I've been doing this a long
- 19:36time.
- 19:37Yeah, we know.
- 19:37Okay. And and now it almost sounds like
- 19:39you're trying to pin something on me
- 19:41now. I I got that sense.
- 19:42Well, what it gets to on these on these
- 19:44cases, and you know it as well as I do,
- 19:45our job is to identify and eliminate
- 19:47something.
- 19:47I can't believe this.
- 19:48So, if we ask you to the point to give
- 19:51us a DNA sample, a bugle swab, so we can
- 19:55identify or eliminate you. Would you be
- 19:57willing to do that?
- 19:58Maybe.
- 20:00Cuz I know this. I I I I
- 20:01That's where we're at, too. I mean,
- 20:03because right now from looking at the
- 20:06evidence, it's, you know, it's possible
- 20:08we may have some DNA at the location.
- 20:10That's great.
- 20:11And
- 20:13we're going to do what we can to try to
- 20:15put this thing together. And your name's
- 20:17in the book. These people are pointing
- 20:19at you for whatever reason.
- 20:21I don't know why. That's just crazy. I
- 20:23mean, that's just that's absolutely
- 20:25crazy.
- 20:25And it would be irresponsible on our
- 20:28part not to look at it.
- 20:29I know you guys have to do your job. And
- 20:31I guess I'm going to have to contact
- 20:32somebody. So
- 20:34that's fair.
- 20:34I mean, cuz I know how this stuff works.
- 20:37I mean, I I I I
- 20:40just can't believe it.
- 20:41That's I mean, we we understand that. I
- 20:43mean, if we were in your position, I
- 20:44mean, we would feel the same way.
- 20:46I just can't even believe it. I mean,
- 20:48it's just I mean, I'm shocked. I'm
- 20:51really shocked
- 20:52that somebody would be blame saying that
- 20:54I did this. I mean, we had a fight and
- 20:55so I went and killed her. I mean, come
- 20:57on. Well,
- 20:58that's
- 21:00okay. All right.
- 21:02Well, thanks for giving me the courtesy.
- 21:03I appreciate report.
- 21:04Thanks for your time.
- 21:05Yeah. Thank you.
- 21:06All right, Stephanie. Take care.
- 21:08All right.
- 21:32This is just absolutely crazy.
- 21:34Let me see.
- 21:37This is insane.
- 21:38Okay,
- 21:46give me one sec.
- 21:51Okay,
- 21:53Stephanie, you know you have the right
- 21:54to remain silent. Do you understand?
- 21:55Yes.
- 21:56Anything you say may be used against you
- 21:58in court. Do you understand?
- 21:59Yes.
- 22:00You have the right to the presence of an
- 22:01attorney before and during any question.
- 22:03Do you understand?
- 22:03Yes.
- 22:04If you cannot afford an attorney, one
- 22:06will be appointed for you free of charge
- 22:07before any questioning if you want. Do
- 22:09you understand?
- 22:10Yes.
- 22:10You want to talk to us right now?
- 22:12No.
- 22:14All right. This is crazy. This is abs.
- 22:17I'm like I'm like in shock. I'm totally
- 22:19in shock.
- 22:24Good afternoon. We are back on the
- 22:26record in People versus
- 22:29Lazarus. Shortly before noon, the uh
- 22:33jury announced they have a verdict. We
- 22:35will take the verdict at this time.
- 22:37People of the state of California versus
- 22:39Stephanie Eileene Lazarus. Case number
- 22:42BA 357423.
- 22:46We the jury in the above entitled action
- 22:48find the defendant Stephanie Eileene
- 22:50Lazarus guilty of the crime of murder of
- 22:53Sher Rasmmanson in violation of penal
- 22:56code section 187A a felony as charged in
- 23:00count one of the information. We further
- 23:03find the murder was of the first degree.
- 23:09Your honor, I'm John Rutton.
- 23:13Thank you for the opportunity to speak
- 23:15during this hearing. Um, there are
- 23:17really no words that can describe the
- 23:19loss of Sherry and the whole of of this
- 23:22experience. So, it makes no sense to
- 23:24talk very long. It suffices to say that
- 23:26the Rasmuson family, my family, and
- 23:30Stephanie's family have been thrust into
- 23:32a bizarre world of disbelief and
- 23:34indescribable sadness.
- 23:37Sher Rasmuson had a profound impact on
- 23:39so many people.
- 23:45and I was proud that she agreed to be my
- 23:47wife.
- 23:48It was impossible not to notice Sherry
- 23:50when she entered a room. To me, her
- 23:52physical presence was startling. I can
- 23:55clearly remember the first moment I laid
- 23:57eyes on her. Sherry Rasmmanson was a
- 23:59physical presence and my heart still
- 24:01races when I look at pictures of her.
- 24:03But Sherry was extraordinary, more for
- 24:05who she was than the way she looked. She
- 24:08was a hard worker, a consmate
- 24:10professional, a leader, a diplomat,
- 24:13forgiving, tough, and a kid at heart.
- 24:16Cher's loss, the way she died, and the
- 24:18trial 25 years after her death has had a
- 24:21profound impact on many, many others.
- 24:25The effects are broad and span a
- 24:27generation, creating pain for those
- 24:28whose lives should have never been
- 24:30touched by this tragic event. Again,
- 24:32words are feeble tools for describing
- 24:34these impacts, but there are so many
- 24:37moments and so very many tears. And the
- 24:39fact that Sherry's death occurred
- 24:41because she met and married me brings me
- 24:43to my knees.
- 24:44Stephanie Lazarus was sentenced to 27
- 24:47years to life for the murder of Sher
- 24:49Rasmuson. She is currently being held
- 24:51inside the maximum security unit of the
- 24:53Central California Women's Facility.
- 24:59Any other cars that stand out in your
- 25:00mind?
- 25:10[Music]
- 25:14[ __ ] Yes.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The Interrogation of Stephanie Lazarus by JCS - Criminal Psychology, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,453 words across 734 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.