YouTube2Text

The great free will debate | Bill Nye, Michio Kaku, Robert Sapolsky, Steven Pinker & more — Transcript

by Big Think · 2,846 words · 181 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00- Well, you ask one of the deepest philosophical  questions of physics. The question of free will.
  2. 0:05- For billions of years on this planet,  there was life, but no free will.
  3. 0:10Physics hasn't changed, but now we have free will.
  4. 0:13- The brains are automatic, but people are free.
  5. 0:15- Our ability to choose is often confused.
  6. 0:19- Human choices will not be  predictable in any simple way.
  7. 0:24- In reality, I don't think  there's any free will at all.
  8. 0:39DANIEL DENNETT:  For billions of years on this planet there was life, but no free will. Physics hasn't changed,
  9. 0:46but now we have free will. The difference is  not in physics. It has to do with, ultimately,
  10. 0:54with biology. Particularly evolutionary biology.  What has happened over those billions of years,
  11. 1:00is that greater and greater competences  have been designed and have evolved.
  12. 1:07And the competence of a dolphin, or of  a chimpanzee, the cognitive competence,
  13. 1:13the sort of mental competence, is hugely superior  to the competence of a lobster, or a starfish. But
  14. 1:22ours dwarfs the competence of a dolphin or a  chimpanzee, perhaps to an even greater extent.
  15. 1:30And there's an entirely naturalistic story to say,  to tell about how we came to have that competence,
  16. 1:36or those competences. And it's that, "Can do."  It's that power that we have which is natural,
  17. 1:44but it's that power which sets us aside from  every other species. And the key to it is that we
  18. 1:52don't just act for reasons.  We represent our reasons
  19. 1:56to ourselves and to others. The business  of asking somebody, "Why did you do that?"
  20. 2:04And the person being able to answer, it is the  key to responsibility. And in fact, the word,
  21. 2:11"responsibility," sort of wears its meaning on its  sleeve. We are responsible because we can respond
  22. 2:19to challenges to our reasons. Why?  Because we don't just act for reasons,
  23. 2:25we act for reasons that we consciously represent  to ourselves. And this is what gives us the power
  24. 2:32and the obligation to think ahead, to anticipate,  to see the consequences of our action.
  25. 2:39To be able to evaluate those consequences  in the light of what other people tell us.
  26. 2:43To share our wisdom with each other. No  other species can do anything like it.
  27. 2:48And it's because we can share our wisdom  that we have a special responsibility.
  28. 2:54That's what makes us free in a way that no bird  is free, for instance. There's a very sharp
  29. 3:02limit to the depth that we as conscious agents can  probe our own activities. This sort of superficial
  30. 3:14access that we have to what's going on,  that's what consciousness is. Now, when I say,
  31. 3:21who's this, "we," who's got this access? That's  itself part of the illusion because there isn't
  32. 3:28a, sort of, boss part of the brain that's sitting  there with this limited access. That itself
  33. 3:36is part of the illusion. What it is, is a  bunch of different subsystems, which have
  34. 3:43varying access to varying things and that  conspire in a sort of competitive way to
  35. 3:51execute whatever projects it is that they're,  in their, sort of, mindless way executing.
  36. 3:56STEVEN PINKER: I don't believe there's such a  thing as free will in the sense of a ghost in
  37. 4:02the machine, a spirit, or soul that somehow reads  the TV screen of the senses and pushes buttons
  38. 4:10and pulls levers of behavior. There's no sense  that we can make of that. I think we are...our
  39. 4:17behavior is the product of physical processes  in the brain. On the other hand, when you
  40. 4:23have a brain that consists of a hundred billion  neurons, connected by a hundred trillion synapses,
  41. 4:29there is a vast amount of complexity. That means  that human choices will not be predictable in any
  42. 4:36simple way from the stimuli that have impinged  on it beforehand. We also know that that brain
  43. 4:44is set up so that there are at least two  kinds of behavior. There's what happens when
  44. 4:49I shine a light in your eye and your iris  contracts, or I hit your knee with a hammer
  45. 4:53and your leg jerks upward. We also know that  there's a part of the brain that does things like
  46. 5:00choose what to have for dinner, whether  to order chocolate, or vanilla ice cream.
  47. 5:04How to move the next chess piece. Whether  to pick up the paper, or put it down. That
  48. 5:10is very different from your iris closing when  I shine a light in your eye. It's that second
  49. 5:16kind of behavior, one that engages vast amounts  of the brain, particularly the frontal lobes,
  50. 5:22that incorporates an enormous amount of  information in the causation of the behavior,
  51. 5:28that has some mental model of the world, that  can predict the consequences of possible behavior
  52. 5:35and select them on the basis of those  consequences. All of those things carve
  53. 5:41out the realm of behavior that we call free  will. Which it is useful to distinguish from
  54. 5:48brute involuntary reflexes, but which doesn't  necessarily have to involve some mysterious soul.
  55. 5:54ROBERT SAPOLSKY: The polite thing that I've sort  of said for decades, is that, well, if there's
  56. 6:00free will, it's in all the boring places and  those places were getting more and more cramped.
  57. 6:06If you want to insist that today you decided to  floss your teeth starting on your upper teeth,
  58. 6:12rather than your lower teeth, rather than the  other way around, that that was an act of free
  59. 6:17will, whatever, I'll grant that one to you, that's  where the free will is. In reality, I don't think
  60. 6:24there's any free will at all. If you look at the  things that come into account as to whether or not
  61. 6:30someone is going to do the right thing in the next  two seconds amid a temptation to do otherwise,
  62. 6:37and the variables in there reflect everything  from whether they are having gas pains that day,
  63. 6:44because of something unpleasant  they ate that morning that makes us
  64. 6:48more selfish, more impulsive, et cetera, to what  epigenetic effects occurred to them than when they
  65. 6:54were a first trimester fetus. When you look at  the number of things we recognize now that are
  66. 7:01biological organic, where 500  years ago, or five years ago,
  67. 7:06we would have had a harsh moral judgment about it.  And instead we now know, "Oh, that's a biological
  68. 7:12phenomenon." And when we're we gonna get to the  point is recognizing, "Yeah, we're biological
  69. 7:16organisms." This notion of free will, for want of  a less provocative word, is nothing but a myth.
  70. 7:23NYE: Our brains are complicated and they got  this big, or as big as they are organically
  71. 7:30through evolution, with layer being added  upon layer. So our ability to choose
  72. 7:36is often confused. Our ability to make  choices and is often affected by the
  73. 7:43environment, by our experiences and by  biochemistry. The shape of our brain.
  74. 7:48MICHIO KAKU:
  75. 7:54Well, you ask one of the deepest philosophical  questions of physics. The question of free will.
  76. 8:00First of all, there's something called, Newtonian  determinism. Newtonian determinism says that the
  77. 8:05universe is a clock. A gigantic clock that's wound  up at the beginning of time and it's been ticking
  78. 8:10ever since, according to Newton's laws of motion.  So, what you're gonna eat 10 years from now on
  79. 8:16January 1st has already been fixed. It's already  known using Newton's laws of motion. Einstein
  80. 8:23believed in that. Einstein was a determinist. And  some people asked Einstein, "Well, does that mean
  81. 8:28"that a murderer, a horrible mass murderer "isn't  really guilty of his works "'cause it was already
  82. 8:34preordained billions of years ago?" And Einstein  said, "Well, yeah, in some sense, that's true.
  83. 8:41"That even mass murderers were predetermined.  "But," he said, "They should still be placed
  84. 8:47in jail," okay? Heisenberg then comes along and  proposes the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  85. 8:53And says, "Nonsense. "There's uncertainty. "You  don't know where the electron is. "It could be
  86. 8:58here, here, or many places simultaneously." And  this of course, Einstein hated because he said,
  87. 9:04"God doesn't play dice with the universe."  Well, hey, get used to it. Einstein was wrong.
  88. 9:12God does play dice. Every time we look at an  electron, it moves. There's uncertainty with
  89. 9:17regards to the position of the electron. So what  does that mean for free will? It means, in some
  90. 9:22sense, we do have some kind of free will. In the  sense that no one can determine your future events
  91. 9:30given your past history. There's always the  wild card. There's always the possibility
  92. 9:35of uncertainty in whatever we do. So this  means that free will, determining the future?
  93. 9:41Hey, these are philosophical questions that seem  to indicate that we have some kind of free will.
  94. 9:49JOSCHA BACH: Like consciousness, free will  is often misunderstood because we know it
  95. 9:56by reference. But it's difficult to know it by  content, what you really mean by free will. A lot
  96. 10:01of people will immediately feel that free will is  related to whether the universe is deterministic,
  97. 10:06or probabilistic. And while physics has some  ideas about that, which change every now and then,
  98. 10:13it's not part of our experience. And I don't think  it makes a difference if the universe forces you
  99. 10:17randomly to do things, or deterministically.  The important thing seems to me that in free
  100. 10:23will you are responsible for your actions.  And responsibility is a social interface.
  101. 10:28For instance, if I am told that if I do X I  go to prison and this changes my decision to
  102. 10:37whether or not to do X, I'm obviously responsible  for my decision because it was an appeal to my
  103. 10:42responsibility, in some sense. Or likewise, if I  do a certain thing that it causes harm to other
  104. 10:47people and I don't want that harm to happen,  that influences my decision. This is a discourse
  105. 10:51of decision-making that I would call it's a free  will decision. Will is the representation that my
  106. 10:58nervous system, at any level of its functioning,  has raised a motive to an intention. It has
  107. 11:04committed to a particular kind of goal and it gets  integrated into the story of myself. This protocol
  108. 11:09that I experience as myself in this world. And  that was what I experienced as well, as a real
  109. 11:15decision. And this decision is free in as much  as this decision can be influenced by discourse.
  110. 11:21MICHAEL GAZZANIGA: The essential part of free  will that people wanna hold on to is the sense
  111. 11:25that that therefore makes you responsible for  your actions. So, there is the idea of personal
  112. 11:31responsibility. And I think that's very important.  And I don't think that all this mechanistic
  113. 11:37work on the brain in any way threatens  that. You learn that responsibility is to
  114. 11:41be understood at the social level. The deal,  the rules that we work out, living together.
  115. 11:48So the metaphor I like to use is cars and  traffic. We can study cars and all their physical
  116. 11:54relationships and know exactly how that works.  It in no way prepares us to understand traffic
  117. 11:59when they all get together and start interacting.  That's another level of organization and
  118. 12:03description of these elements interacting. So the  same is with brains. That we can understand brains
  119. 12:11to the nth degree and that's fine and that's what  we're doing, but it's not going to, in any way,
  120. 12:18interfere with the fact that taking responsibility  in a social network is done at that level.
  121. 12:26So, the way I sum it up is that brains  are automatic, but people are free
  122. 12:30because people are gonna be...are joining the  social group and in that group are laws to live
  123. 12:40by. And it's interesting, every social network,  whether it's artifactual, internet, or people,
  124. 12:48that accountability is essential,  or the whole thing just falls apart.
  125. 12:56DENNETT:
  126. 12:57Intuition pumps are sometimes called thought  experiments. More often, they're called thought
  127. 13:01experiments. But they're not really formal  arguments. Typically, they're stories. They're
  128. 13:07little fables. In fact, I think they're similar  to Aesop's fables in that they they're supposed
  129. 13:13to have a moral. They're supposed to teach us  something. And what they do, is they lead the
  130. 13:19audience to an intuition, a conclusion, where you  sort of pound your fist on the table and you say,
  131. 13:25"Oh yeah, it's gotta be that way, doesn't  it?" And if it achieves that, then it's
  132. 13:30pumped the intuition that was designed to pump.  These are persuasion machines. They're little
  133. 13:35persuasion machines that philosophers have  been using for several thousand years.
  134. 13:39One of my recent favorites, which I devised to  jangle the nerves of neuroscientists who've been
  135. 13:48going around saying that neuroscience  shows that we don't have free will.
  136. 13:53I think their reasons for saying that are  ill-considered and moreover that what they're
  137. 13:59doing is apt to be mischievous and doing some real  harm. So, I concocted a little thought experiment,
  138. 14:06a little intuition pump to suggest that. So  this is the case of the nefarious neurosurgeon,
  139. 14:13who treats a patient who has obsessive compulsive  disorder by inserting a little microchip in his
  140. 14:22brain, which controls the OCD, the obsessive  compulsive disorder. Now, there is such a chip.
  141. 14:30It's been developed in the Netherlands and it  works really quite well. That's science fact,
  142. 14:36but now here comes science fiction. So the  neurosurgeon, after she's operated on the guy,
  143. 14:43sewed him all up, say, "Okay, your OCD is  under control now you'll be happy to learn,
  144. 14:48but moreover our team here will be monitoring  you 24/7 and we're going to be controlling
  145. 14:56everything you do from now on. You will think  you have free will. You'll think you're making
  146. 15:01your own decisions, but really you won't have  free will at all. Free will is an illusion that
  147. 15:05we will maintain while controlling you. Goodbye,  have a nice life." Sends him out the door. Well,
  148. 15:13he believes her. She has a shiny lab and, you  know, lots of degrees and diplomas and all that.
  149. 15:20So, what does he do? Well, he, thinking he  doesn't have free will anymore, he gets a little
  150. 15:26self-indulgent, a little bit aggressive, little  negligent in how he decides what to do. And pretty
  151. 15:33soon, by indulging some of his worst features,  he's got himself in trouble with the law. And he's
  152. 15:40arrested and he's put on trial. And at the trial  he says, "But your honor, I don't have free will.
  153. 15:48I'm under the control of the team at  the neurosurgery clinic." They say,
  154. 15:53"What's this?" And they call the neurosurgeon to  the stand. And say, "Did you tell this man that
  155. 15:59you are controlling his every move, he didn't  have free will?" She says, "Yeah, I did, yeah,
  156. 16:04but I was just messing with his head. That was  just a joke. I didn't think he'd believe me."
  157. 16:09Now, right there, I think we can stop, take a  deep breath and say, well she did something really
  158. 16:14bad. That was...that was really, she really  harmed that man. In fact, her little "joke,"
  159. 16:23telling him that, actually accomplished  non-surgically pretty much what she claimed to
  160. 16:28accomplish surgically. She disabled him by  telling him he didn't have free will. She
  161. 16:35pretty much turned his free will off and  turned him into a morally incompetent person.
  162. 16:44Now, if we agree that she did a bad thing, if  nobody recommends people play jokes like this,
  163. 16:52what are we to say about the neuroscientists who  are telling the public every day, "We've shown in
  164. 16:57our neuroscience labs that nobody has free will."  I think if the neuroscientists recognize that what
  165. 17:06my imaginary neurosurgeon did was irresponsible,  they should think seriously about whether it's
  166. 17:13irresponsible of them to make these claims  about free will. And it's not just a fantasy.
  167. 17:21Vohs and Schooler, in an important paper, which  has been replicated in several different ways,
  168. 17:27set up an experiment, really to test  this with college students, who were
  169. 17:35given two texts to read. One was a text. They  were both from Francis Crick's book, "The
  170. 17:41Astonishing Hypothesis," and one was not about  free will. And the other was about free will. And
  171. 17:48basically it said, "Free will is an illusion.  All your decisions are actually determined by
  172. 17:56causes that neuroscience is investigating. You  don't have free will. That's just an illusion."
  173. 18:02All right, so there we have two groups. The group  that read that passage and the group that read
  174. 18:06another passage from that book of the same length.  After they've read the passage, they are given a
  175. 18:14puzzle to solve where they can earn some money  by solving it. And the experimenters cleverly
  176. 18:21made the puzzles slightly defective, so there  was a way of cheating on the puzzle. That was,
  177. 18:29oops, inadvertently revealed to the subjects. And  guess what? The subjects who'd read the passage
  178. 18:39where Crick says, "Free will is an illusion,"  cheated at a much higher rate than the other ones.
  179. 18:46In other words, just reading that passage  did have the effect of making them
  180. 18:53less concerned about the implications of their  actions and they became, as it were, negligent,
  181. 19:02or worse, in their own decision-making.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of The great free will debate | Bill Nye, Michio Kaku, Robert Sapolsky, Steven Pinker & more by Big Think, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,846 words across 181 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.