The great free will debate | Bill Nye, Michio Kaku, Robert Sapolsky, Steven Pinker & more — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00- Well, you ask one of the deepest philosophical questions of physics. The question of free will.
- 0:05- For billions of years on this planet, there was life, but no free will.
- 0:10Physics hasn't changed, but now we have free will.
- 0:13- The brains are automatic, but people are free.
- 0:15- Our ability to choose is often confused.
- 0:19- Human choices will not be predictable in any simple way.
- 0:24- In reality, I don't think there's any free will at all.
- 0:39DANIEL DENNETT: For billions of years on this planet there was life, but no free will. Physics hasn't changed,
- 0:46but now we have free will. The difference is not in physics. It has to do with, ultimately,
- 0:54with biology. Particularly evolutionary biology. What has happened over those billions of years,
- 1:00is that greater and greater competences have been designed and have evolved.
- 1:07And the competence of a dolphin, or of a chimpanzee, the cognitive competence,
- 1:13the sort of mental competence, is hugely superior to the competence of a lobster, or a starfish. But
- 1:22ours dwarfs the competence of a dolphin or a chimpanzee, perhaps to an even greater extent.
- 1:30And there's an entirely naturalistic story to say, to tell about how we came to have that competence,
- 1:36or those competences. And it's that, "Can do." It's that power that we have which is natural,
- 1:44but it's that power which sets us aside from every other species. And the key to it is that we
- 1:52don't just act for reasons. We represent our reasons
- 1:56to ourselves and to others. The business of asking somebody, "Why did you do that?"
- 2:04And the person being able to answer, it is the key to responsibility. And in fact, the word,
- 2:11"responsibility," sort of wears its meaning on its sleeve. We are responsible because we can respond
- 2:19to challenges to our reasons. Why? Because we don't just act for reasons,
- 2:25we act for reasons that we consciously represent to ourselves. And this is what gives us the power
- 2:32and the obligation to think ahead, to anticipate, to see the consequences of our action.
- 2:39To be able to evaluate those consequences in the light of what other people tell us.
- 2:43To share our wisdom with each other. No other species can do anything like it.
- 2:48And it's because we can share our wisdom that we have a special responsibility.
- 2:54That's what makes us free in a way that no bird is free, for instance. There's a very sharp
- 3:02limit to the depth that we as conscious agents can probe our own activities. This sort of superficial
- 3:14access that we have to what's going on, that's what consciousness is. Now, when I say,
- 3:21who's this, "we," who's got this access? That's itself part of the illusion because there isn't
- 3:28a, sort of, boss part of the brain that's sitting there with this limited access. That itself
- 3:36is part of the illusion. What it is, is a bunch of different subsystems, which have
- 3:43varying access to varying things and that conspire in a sort of competitive way to
- 3:51execute whatever projects it is that they're, in their, sort of, mindless way executing.
- 3:56STEVEN PINKER: I don't believe there's such a thing as free will in the sense of a ghost in
- 4:02the machine, a spirit, or soul that somehow reads the TV screen of the senses and pushes buttons
- 4:10and pulls levers of behavior. There's no sense that we can make of that. I think we are...our
- 4:17behavior is the product of physical processes in the brain. On the other hand, when you
- 4:23have a brain that consists of a hundred billion neurons, connected by a hundred trillion synapses,
- 4:29there is a vast amount of complexity. That means that human choices will not be predictable in any
- 4:36simple way from the stimuli that have impinged on it beforehand. We also know that that brain
- 4:44is set up so that there are at least two kinds of behavior. There's what happens when
- 4:49I shine a light in your eye and your iris contracts, or I hit your knee with a hammer
- 4:53and your leg jerks upward. We also know that there's a part of the brain that does things like
- 5:00choose what to have for dinner, whether to order chocolate, or vanilla ice cream.
- 5:04How to move the next chess piece. Whether to pick up the paper, or put it down. That
- 5:10is very different from your iris closing when I shine a light in your eye. It's that second
- 5:16kind of behavior, one that engages vast amounts of the brain, particularly the frontal lobes,
- 5:22that incorporates an enormous amount of information in the causation of the behavior,
- 5:28that has some mental model of the world, that can predict the consequences of possible behavior
- 5:35and select them on the basis of those consequences. All of those things carve
- 5:41out the realm of behavior that we call free will. Which it is useful to distinguish from
- 5:48brute involuntary reflexes, but which doesn't necessarily have to involve some mysterious soul.
- 5:54ROBERT SAPOLSKY: The polite thing that I've sort of said for decades, is that, well, if there's
- 6:00free will, it's in all the boring places and those places were getting more and more cramped.
- 6:06If you want to insist that today you decided to floss your teeth starting on your upper teeth,
- 6:12rather than your lower teeth, rather than the other way around, that that was an act of free
- 6:17will, whatever, I'll grant that one to you, that's where the free will is. In reality, I don't think
- 6:24there's any free will at all. If you look at the things that come into account as to whether or not
- 6:30someone is going to do the right thing in the next two seconds amid a temptation to do otherwise,
- 6:37and the variables in there reflect everything from whether they are having gas pains that day,
- 6:44because of something unpleasant they ate that morning that makes us
- 6:48more selfish, more impulsive, et cetera, to what epigenetic effects occurred to them than when they
- 6:54were a first trimester fetus. When you look at the number of things we recognize now that are
- 7:01biological organic, where 500 years ago, or five years ago,
- 7:06we would have had a harsh moral judgment about it. And instead we now know, "Oh, that's a biological
- 7:12phenomenon." And when we're we gonna get to the point is recognizing, "Yeah, we're biological
- 7:16organisms." This notion of free will, for want of a less provocative word, is nothing but a myth.
- 7:23NYE: Our brains are complicated and they got this big, or as big as they are organically
- 7:30through evolution, with layer being added upon layer. So our ability to choose
- 7:36is often confused. Our ability to make choices and is often affected by the
- 7:43environment, by our experiences and by biochemistry. The shape of our brain.
- 7:48MICHIO KAKU:
- 7:54Well, you ask one of the deepest philosophical questions of physics. The question of free will.
- 8:00First of all, there's something called, Newtonian determinism. Newtonian determinism says that the
- 8:05universe is a clock. A gigantic clock that's wound up at the beginning of time and it's been ticking
- 8:10ever since, according to Newton's laws of motion. So, what you're gonna eat 10 years from now on
- 8:16January 1st has already been fixed. It's already known using Newton's laws of motion. Einstein
- 8:23believed in that. Einstein was a determinist. And some people asked Einstein, "Well, does that mean
- 8:28"that a murderer, a horrible mass murderer "isn't really guilty of his works "'cause it was already
- 8:34preordained billions of years ago?" And Einstein said, "Well, yeah, in some sense, that's true.
- 8:41"That even mass murderers were predetermined. "But," he said, "They should still be placed
- 8:47in jail," okay? Heisenberg then comes along and proposes the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
- 8:53And says, "Nonsense. "There's uncertainty. "You don't know where the electron is. "It could be
- 8:58here, here, or many places simultaneously." And this of course, Einstein hated because he said,
- 9:04"God doesn't play dice with the universe." Well, hey, get used to it. Einstein was wrong.
- 9:12God does play dice. Every time we look at an electron, it moves. There's uncertainty with
- 9:17regards to the position of the electron. So what does that mean for free will? It means, in some
- 9:22sense, we do have some kind of free will. In the sense that no one can determine your future events
- 9:30given your past history. There's always the wild card. There's always the possibility
- 9:35of uncertainty in whatever we do. So this means that free will, determining the future?
- 9:41Hey, these are philosophical questions that seem to indicate that we have some kind of free will.
- 9:49JOSCHA BACH: Like consciousness, free will is often misunderstood because we know it
- 9:56by reference. But it's difficult to know it by content, what you really mean by free will. A lot
- 10:01of people will immediately feel that free will is related to whether the universe is deterministic,
- 10:06or probabilistic. And while physics has some ideas about that, which change every now and then,
- 10:13it's not part of our experience. And I don't think it makes a difference if the universe forces you
- 10:17randomly to do things, or deterministically. The important thing seems to me that in free
- 10:23will you are responsible for your actions. And responsibility is a social interface.
- 10:28For instance, if I am told that if I do X I go to prison and this changes my decision to
- 10:37whether or not to do X, I'm obviously responsible for my decision because it was an appeal to my
- 10:42responsibility, in some sense. Or likewise, if I do a certain thing that it causes harm to other
- 10:47people and I don't want that harm to happen, that influences my decision. This is a discourse
- 10:51of decision-making that I would call it's a free will decision. Will is the representation that my
- 10:58nervous system, at any level of its functioning, has raised a motive to an intention. It has
- 11:04committed to a particular kind of goal and it gets integrated into the story of myself. This protocol
- 11:09that I experience as myself in this world. And that was what I experienced as well, as a real
- 11:15decision. And this decision is free in as much as this decision can be influenced by discourse.
- 11:21MICHAEL GAZZANIGA: The essential part of free will that people wanna hold on to is the sense
- 11:25that that therefore makes you responsible for your actions. So, there is the idea of personal
- 11:31responsibility. And I think that's very important. And I don't think that all this mechanistic
- 11:37work on the brain in any way threatens that. You learn that responsibility is to
- 11:41be understood at the social level. The deal, the rules that we work out, living together.
- 11:48So the metaphor I like to use is cars and traffic. We can study cars and all their physical
- 11:54relationships and know exactly how that works. It in no way prepares us to understand traffic
- 11:59when they all get together and start interacting. That's another level of organization and
- 12:03description of these elements interacting. So the same is with brains. That we can understand brains
- 12:11to the nth degree and that's fine and that's what we're doing, but it's not going to, in any way,
- 12:18interfere with the fact that taking responsibility in a social network is done at that level.
- 12:26So, the way I sum it up is that brains are automatic, but people are free
- 12:30because people are gonna be...are joining the social group and in that group are laws to live
- 12:40by. And it's interesting, every social network, whether it's artifactual, internet, or people,
- 12:48that accountability is essential, or the whole thing just falls apart.
- 12:56DENNETT:
- 12:57Intuition pumps are sometimes called thought experiments. More often, they're called thought
- 13:01experiments. But they're not really formal arguments. Typically, they're stories. They're
- 13:07little fables. In fact, I think they're similar to Aesop's fables in that they they're supposed
- 13:13to have a moral. They're supposed to teach us something. And what they do, is they lead the
- 13:19audience to an intuition, a conclusion, where you sort of pound your fist on the table and you say,
- 13:25"Oh yeah, it's gotta be that way, doesn't it?" And if it achieves that, then it's
- 13:30pumped the intuition that was designed to pump. These are persuasion machines. They're little
- 13:35persuasion machines that philosophers have been using for several thousand years.
- 13:39One of my recent favorites, which I devised to jangle the nerves of neuroscientists who've been
- 13:48going around saying that neuroscience shows that we don't have free will.
- 13:53I think their reasons for saying that are ill-considered and moreover that what they're
- 13:59doing is apt to be mischievous and doing some real harm. So, I concocted a little thought experiment,
- 14:06a little intuition pump to suggest that. So this is the case of the nefarious neurosurgeon,
- 14:13who treats a patient who has obsessive compulsive disorder by inserting a little microchip in his
- 14:22brain, which controls the OCD, the obsessive compulsive disorder. Now, there is such a chip.
- 14:30It's been developed in the Netherlands and it works really quite well. That's science fact,
- 14:36but now here comes science fiction. So the neurosurgeon, after she's operated on the guy,
- 14:43sewed him all up, say, "Okay, your OCD is under control now you'll be happy to learn,
- 14:48but moreover our team here will be monitoring you 24/7 and we're going to be controlling
- 14:56everything you do from now on. You will think you have free will. You'll think you're making
- 15:01your own decisions, but really you won't have free will at all. Free will is an illusion that
- 15:05we will maintain while controlling you. Goodbye, have a nice life." Sends him out the door. Well,
- 15:13he believes her. She has a shiny lab and, you know, lots of degrees and diplomas and all that.
- 15:20So, what does he do? Well, he, thinking he doesn't have free will anymore, he gets a little
- 15:26self-indulgent, a little bit aggressive, little negligent in how he decides what to do. And pretty
- 15:33soon, by indulging some of his worst features, he's got himself in trouble with the law. And he's
- 15:40arrested and he's put on trial. And at the trial he says, "But your honor, I don't have free will.
- 15:48I'm under the control of the team at the neurosurgery clinic." They say,
- 15:53"What's this?" And they call the neurosurgeon to the stand. And say, "Did you tell this man that
- 15:59you are controlling his every move, he didn't have free will?" She says, "Yeah, I did, yeah,
- 16:04but I was just messing with his head. That was just a joke. I didn't think he'd believe me."
- 16:09Now, right there, I think we can stop, take a deep breath and say, well she did something really
- 16:14bad. That was...that was really, she really harmed that man. In fact, her little "joke,"
- 16:23telling him that, actually accomplished non-surgically pretty much what she claimed to
- 16:28accomplish surgically. She disabled him by telling him he didn't have free will. She
- 16:35pretty much turned his free will off and turned him into a morally incompetent person.
- 16:44Now, if we agree that she did a bad thing, if nobody recommends people play jokes like this,
- 16:52what are we to say about the neuroscientists who are telling the public every day, "We've shown in
- 16:57our neuroscience labs that nobody has free will." I think if the neuroscientists recognize that what
- 17:06my imaginary neurosurgeon did was irresponsible, they should think seriously about whether it's
- 17:13irresponsible of them to make these claims about free will. And it's not just a fantasy.
- 17:21Vohs and Schooler, in an important paper, which has been replicated in several different ways,
- 17:27set up an experiment, really to test this with college students, who were
- 17:35given two texts to read. One was a text. They were both from Francis Crick's book, "The
- 17:41Astonishing Hypothesis," and one was not about free will. And the other was about free will. And
- 17:48basically it said, "Free will is an illusion. All your decisions are actually determined by
- 17:56causes that neuroscience is investigating. You don't have free will. That's just an illusion."
- 18:02All right, so there we have two groups. The group that read that passage and the group that read
- 18:06another passage from that book of the same length. After they've read the passage, they are given a
- 18:14puzzle to solve where they can earn some money by solving it. And the experimenters cleverly
- 18:21made the puzzles slightly defective, so there was a way of cheating on the puzzle. That was,
- 18:29oops, inadvertently revealed to the subjects. And guess what? The subjects who'd read the passage
- 18:39where Crick says, "Free will is an illusion," cheated at a much higher rate than the other ones.
- 18:46In other words, just reading that passage did have the effect of making them
- 18:53less concerned about the implications of their actions and they became, as it were, negligent,
- 19:02or worse, in their own decision-making.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The great free will debate | Bill Nye, Michio Kaku, Robert Sapolsky, Steven Pinker & more by Big Think, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,846 words across 181 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.