The Future Of SEO Is Scary — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Someone who helps Fortune 500 brands
- 0:02rank inside ChatGPT and Claude just sat
- 0:04down with Sequoia and said something
- 0:06that should terrify every marketer
- 0:08watching this. He said the internet as
- 0:10we know it could be dead within 3 years.
- 0:13That humans are about to stop browsing
- 0:15websites entirely. That agents are going
- 0:17to replace consumers as the people
- 0:19walking through the front door of every
- 0:21business on Earth. And the data he's
- 0:23showing backs it up. But here's what
- 0:25nobody's in the comments is talking
- 0:26about. Yeah? Are you upset about it? You
- 0:28keep wanting to be seen. There's one
- 0:30category of business, one that is
- 0:32structurally immune to what he's
- 0:34describing. And Google has quietly
- 0:36launched a product that confirms they
- 0:38know it, too. I've been working in this
- 0:40category for 10 years. Let me show you
- 0:42what I see.
- 0:43>> We've now reached a point in marketing
- 0:45where if your marketing team is not
- 0:46using agents,
- 0:48and in particular profound agents, to do
- 0:50marketing, then you are failing.
- 0:53>> Hm.
- 0:53>> It's gone from a nice-to-have to a
- 0:55must-have. And I think the big
- 0:56misconception with using agents to build
- 0:58marketing is that it's just a way to
- 1:01automate
- 1:02the work that we've been doing in the
- 1:03>> until now.
- 1:04>> Yeah. Um well, thanks for having me on,
- 1:06Sonia. Um
- 1:08>> [snorts]
- 1:08>> I mean, I think
- 1:10you know, what we're
- 1:12what we're witnessing is the biggest
- 1:14platform shift in the history of
- 1:15marketing
- 1:16as the world turns from blue link
- 1:20search, like predetermined blue link
- 1:21search, to probabilistic AI responses.
- 1:25Um
- 1:26and it's and it's more than that as
- 1:28well. It's not just kind of a case of do
- 1:30you show up when
- 1:32someone asks ChatGPT about your
- 1:35category? Um it's you know, what does
- 1:38ChatGPT say?
- 1:39Or how does Claude, you know, recommend
- 1:42your software, for example, if you're
- 1:44talking about coding tools? Um
- 1:46It's it's it's the these models are
- 1:48really replacing, you know, it's the
- 1:50agents and superintelligence is
- 1:52replacing the role of the consumer. It's
- 1:55not so much that the front door of the
- 1:58internet has changed. It's actually the
- 2:00person that's going through the door has
- 2:01changed. It's gone from being a consumer
- 2:03that is
- 2:05using a list of blue links to
- 2:08discover your website and click into it
- 2:10to an agent is now using, you know, a
- 2:12similar index and discovering your brand
- 2:15products and services and then coming
- 2:16back through the door and, you know,
- 2:19maintaining that relationship with the
- 2:20consumer.
- 2:21>> So, it's interesting. So, the point he's
- 2:23making is something that I've heard from
- 2:25a lot of other people, including Sundar
- 2:27Pichai, the CEO of Google himself. The
- 2:30way he phrased this when asked about the
- 2:32future of Google Search is that he sees
- 2:34Google Search becoming an agentic
- 2:37manager, where you would go to Google,
- 2:39you'd type in what you're searching for,
- 2:41what you're interested in learning, and
- 2:42then instead of Google's algorithm
- 2:45giving you links or an AI overview
- 2:47giving you an answer, instead Google
- 2:49will dispatch a series of AI agents to
- 2:52go find exactly what you want. This is
- 2:54exactly what he's saying. Marketers are
- 2:57continuing to pattern match to the
- 2:59latest platform shift. This is not what
- 3:02we're talking about. The channel itself
- 3:04isn't changing, the user is. Where we
- 3:07used to think about writing so that we
- 3:09could rank on Google Search, and then
- 3:12once you're ranked, optimizing for the
- 3:14humans. That's now not very important.
- 3:17Most everything is writing to rank on
- 3:20Google Search and to be recommended by
- 3:22AI, and then that's kind of it.
- 3:24>> That's so fascinating. Okay, so your
- 3:26your point is, you know, ChatGPT may be
- 3:28the new front door, but the thing that's
- 3:29important for marketers is, you know,
- 3:31you now have an agent walking through
- 3:32that door and making a big part of that
- 3:35buying decision for you.
- 3:36>> Yeah, it's this I think that's the
- 3:38that's the fundamental difference. It's
- 3:40that the internet has remained the same.
- 3:42It's just who is using the internet.
- 3:44When you ask ChatGPT a question or
- 3:46Gemini a question,
- 3:48what you're essentially doing is asking
- 3:50an agent to go and crawl the internet on
- 3:53your behalf.
- 3:53>> Mhm.
- 3:54>> And that is an agent that's going to
- 3:56visit all of those websites that you
- 3:58used to visit. And it's an agent that's
- 4:00going to determine if that's useful or
- 4:02this is useful and
- 4:04remix all of that information into an
- 4:06answer that it spits out to you as uh
- 4:09you know, here you go.
- 4:11>> Yeah.
- 4:12What do you think is the biggest
- 4:14misconception people have about what it
- 4:16takes to
- 4:17to show up well for this new agentic
- 4:19paradigm?
- 4:20>> I think the biggest misconception is
- 4:21that it's just SEO.
- 4:23>> Mhm.
- 4:24>> You know, there there's
- 4:26a reason why that misconception exists
- 4:28because yeah, of course, you still you
- 4:30know, in in any world of marketing
- 4:34and discovery, there is an impetus on a
- 4:37brand or you know, the yeah, you said we
- 4:38work with this is close to 12% of the
- 4:40Fortune 500 now. Their marketing teams
- 4:42use profound.
- 4:44And in any world, the solution to a
- 4:46problem is to create content, distribute
- 4:49content on your own own channels or you
- 4:52know, earned media or social channels
- 4:53etc. So, they're very similar levers to
- 4:56what we've seen with SEO and yes,
- 4:58ranking on the index still matters. It's
- 5:00just that
- 5:02the human consumer is no longer using
- 5:05the web.
- 5:06And you are building content that may
- 5:08quite literally never be consumed
- 5:12by a human.
- 5:13>> So, I can agree with what he's saying.
- 5:15It's interesting because he almost
- 5:16immediately went against himself. He
- 5:18said it's not just SEO, but then he went
- 5:21to talk about how ranking on Google
- 5:24which is obviously SEO is still very
- 5:26important. The difference he's talking
- 5:28about is what I literally just said that
- 5:31instead of writing content to rank on
- 5:33Google and then convert humans, it's
- 5:36writing content to rank on Google and
- 5:38then talk to AI agents. For enterprise,
- 5:41absolutely, there's a lot there. If we
- 5:44think about local search, that
- 5:46discipline is basically already there,
- 5:48right? We know that pretty much every AI
- 5:51agent is using the Google Business
- 5:54Profile as the center of a business
- 5:57entity. Uh Chat GPT uses Bing for
- 5:59business, but it's basically the same
- 6:01thing. You can actually even copy them
- 6:02over. So, when we think about like doing
- 6:05that for an AI agent in the local space,
- 6:08it's really I don't know, GBPO?
- 6:11So, the misconception here isn't local
- 6:13marketers thinking that it's just SEO.
- 6:17It's enterprise marketers thinking that
- 6:19their playbook transfers one-to-one.
- 6:22>> And I think the fundamental difference
- 6:24between SEO and this new world is that
- 6:27in SEO you were building content
- 6:30that was designed to be, you know,
- 6:32picked up by an algorithm,
- 6:34but fundamentally consumed by a human.
- 6:37Whereas in this new world, you are
- 6:38building content that is, frankly,
- 6:40designed entirely to be both discovered
- 6:43and then consumed by an agent.
- 6:46>> He's not wrong. And honestly, for local,
- 6:49we've been in the situation for many,
- 6:51many years, right? In local search, what
- 6:54we're focused on doing is ranking the
- 6:55GBP farther and farther away from the
- 6:58searcher's location, okay?
- 7:01We're not trying to rank the individual
- 7:02website. Very few people who are
- 7:05searching for a local business will
- 7:07spend significant time on that local
- 7:09business's website. From Google
- 7:11Analytics data, it's like 20 to 30
- 7:13seconds at most. So, for local search,
- 7:16this isn't actually a huge change. We're
- 7:19already building content to rank the GBP
- 7:22so that the GBP can rank farther and
- 7:25farther for more and more different
- 7:26queries, knowing that the likelihood of
- 7:28a human ever reading that content is
- 7:31exceptionally low.
- 7:32>> So, I would imagine humans are less
- 7:35patient than agents. Um I would imagine
- 7:38humans are more prone to
- 7:40emotional biases and being swayed by
- 7:43language than agents. Like, what are the
- 7:45what are the biggest differences between
- 7:47how humans and how agents consume the
- 7:49internet that marketers should keep in
- 7:51mind?
- 7:52>> It's understanding that an agent
- 7:54crawling the web looking for an answer
- 7:56or providing an answer frankly um will
- 7:59discover information differently
- 8:02to a human. And so it
- 8:05uses the index differently to us.
- 8:08In the old world of SEO, you know, 95%
- 8:11of the value was being in that top four
- 8:13blue links.
- 8:14>> Yeah.
- 8:14>> The top five blue links.
- 8:16And that really is a function of our
- 8:18scarce cognitive energy and patience and
- 8:20our
- 8:21our lack of time.
- 8:22>> Yeah.
- 8:23>> Where an agent is using
- 8:26that index, it's you what we've seen is
- 8:28ChatGPT or Gemini or Claude are far more
- 8:31prone to using the long tail of the
- 8:33internet. And the amount of surface area
- 8:35that an agent will use to answer a
- 8:37question
- 8:38is orders of magnitude
- 8:41wider than a human.
- 8:43>> Absolutely. Completely agree with this
- 8:46point that he's making. And when Google
- 8:49started to talk about its Ask Maps
- 8:51feature, which basically integrates
- 8:52Gemini into Google Maps,
- 8:54uh Google started to talk about
- 8:56attribute matching where somebody can
- 8:58ask something very specific to Ask Maps,
- 9:01very similar to what they might type
- 9:02into ChatGPT, and Gemini or ChatGPT, the
- 9:05agent of your choice, is actually going
- 9:07to read all of the reviews about this
- 9:09business on all of the different
- 9:10platforms and look for evidence on those
- 9:13reviews that this business it has done
- 9:15that exact service before that you're
- 9:17asking about. It's going to look on your
- 9:19website to see if you talk about doing
- 9:22that exact service, whereas a human
- 9:24wouldn't. A human might need a water
- 9:26heater replacement, so they type in
- 9:28plumber Phoenix, and they're going to
- 9:31just call the first or second result.
- 9:33But, if you go to ChatGPT and say, "Hey,
- 9:36I have a 50-gallon water heater. It's in
- 9:39the closet. I need it replaced in the
- 9:41next day." Then, the AI agent is going
- 9:44to go and look at a lot more
- 9:46information. And I believe 10 times, 100
- 9:49times the amount of information. Look at
- 9:51reviews. Has this plumber
- 9:54replaced that size of water tank before?
- 9:57Has he done that before in this closet?
- 10:00In this suburb? Is this a specific place
- 10:02he's he's working at before? Whereas a
- 10:05human is just going to tap the call
- 10:06button.
- 10:07>> Like for instance, probably about three
- 10:08or four months ago,
- 10:10I was looking for a shower head
- 10:12for my apartment in New York City, and I
- 10:15used ChatGPT to help me find a new
- 10:17shower head, and it used 65 different
- 10:19web pages to answer that question.
- 10:20>> Wow.
- 10:22I think I probably went through 65 web
- 10:23pages on my own for that query.
- 10:26>> [laughter]
- 10:26>> A very important purchase.
- 10:27>> Yeah. Right. So, I mean, again, he's
- 10:29right. But, if we think about someone
- 10:31who needs a water heater replacement or
- 10:34trucker who's broken down on I-10,
- 10:36they're not asking ChatGPT to compare 65
- 10:39options. They're opening maps, and
- 10:42they're going to hit the first call
- 10:43button. The user behavior that he's
- 10:45describing here very much applies to
- 10:48what we refer to as high-trust research
- 10:51purposes. It does not apply to like an
- 10:54urgent local service. So, what this
- 10:56means, right, is if you're a local
- 10:57service like an LASIK eye surgeon or
- 11:00cosmetic surgeon, then we absolutely in
- 11:03Google Analytics data, we see people
- 11:05spend 10, 15 minutes on websites for
- 11:09those high-trust services. Most local
- 11:12businesses aren't in those spaces. Most
- 11:14local businesses Google Analytics,
- 11:16people are spending less than 20 seconds
- 11:18there.
- 11:19>> And and and if if if so, what what's the
- 11:21root cause?
- 11:22>> Yeah, I mean, we see huge differences
- 11:24between the platforms.
- 11:25>> Okay.
- 11:25>> Um and frankly, you know, as a shameless
- 11:27plug, that's why marketers are using
- 11:31software like profound because what
- 11:33we're able to do is help you understand
- 11:35not just how your brand or product shows
- 11:38up across different platforms. So, you
- 11:40know, okay, do you show up more
- 11:41frequently in Gemini responses or Claude
- 11:43responses or ChatGPT responses?
- 11:45>> Mhm.
- 11:46>> Also, we extract the sentiment and the
- 11:47themes around you know, so when Claude
- 11:49surfaces your brand or product,
- 11:51what are the other things that it says
- 11:52alongside the answer?
- 11:54>> Yeah.
- 11:54>> But then we also get to the root cause.
- 11:56So, we show we expose to marketers,
- 11:59okay, these are the citations and
- 12:01sources that the different models are
- 12:02using
- 12:04to answer questions about your brand,
- 12:06your products, your category, or your
- 12:07competitors.
- 12:08>> Yeah.
- 12:08>> So, once you understand the what and the
- 12:10why,
- 12:11then in profound what you're the next
- 12:14step is you're building and deploying
- 12:15your own agents
- 12:18to sort through all of that data and
- 12:20build a new type of marketing that
- 12:22>> And is the primary root cause that they
- 12:24have, you know, different harnesses is
- 12:26the primary primary root cause that they
- 12:28have different training data mix?
- 12:29Primary root cause some of them, you
- 12:30know,
- 12:31bias for, let's say, Reddit data over,
- 12:34you know, company-owned
- 12:36platforms? Like, what's the root cause
- 12:38for why these platforms are so different
- 12:39in terms of how companies show up?
- 12:41>> Think of them this sounds either very
- 12:43reductive, but think of them as just
- 12:44different
- 12:46and you know, different species.
- 12:48>> Mhm.
- 12:49>> If the, you know,
- 12:50what we've seen is Gemini will lean on
- 12:53YouTube content a ton, which makes sense
- 12:55cuz Google owns YouTube. So, that we see
- 12:57we see
- 12:58you know, YouTube being a huge lever for
- 13:00brands or marketers that want to appear
- 13:02in Gemini responses.
- 13:03>> Mhm.
- 13:04>> Whereas ChatGPT, yeah, we see typically
- 13:06pulls from Reddit if it's consumer or if
- 13:09it's B2B, it will typically pull from
- 13:11LinkedIn. We see as a huge source of
- 13:13truth.
- 13:13>> Mhm.
- 13:14>> Um
- 13:15Claude is
- 13:17Claude has has been changing a lot
- 13:19recently. You know, I think what
- 13:20>> And why is that? I know there's this It
- 13:22seems like between 4.5 and 4.6 even like
- 13:24what it's recommending has changed a
- 13:25lot. Why do you think that is?
- 13:27>> I think Claude has typically or Claude
- 13:30has historically relied more on the
- 13:32pre-trained LLM to answer questions
- 13:35and is now I think they've updated their
- 13:38classifiers or something that's you know
- 13:40basically that the classifier seems to
- 13:42have become a bit more sensitive to you
- 13:44know real-time information. So Claude
- 13:47will use the web more to answer
- 13:48questions is what we're finding.
- 13:50>> Okay.
- 13:51>> But I think you know the the next
- 13:52paradigm here we're so we're so we're
- 13:55such
- 13:56>> [sighs and gasps]
- 13:56>> humans are such creatures of heuristics.
- 13:59>> So this is interesting and this is
- 14:01something that we've known and we've
- 14:02honestly been taking advantage of again
- 14:04in the local space. Right? We know that
- 14:07YouTube presents feeds Gemini. We know
- 14:09that reviews on your GBP on Yelp on
- 14:13Trustpilot feed all of these different
- 14:15AI tools. This is one of the reasons
- 14:17that at our local SEO agency we will
- 14:20often produce YouTube videos for every
- 14:23third to every fourth article we
- 14:25publish. One that helps rank on Google
- 14:28but even in a world where Google is
- 14:30going away
- 14:31having a presence on YouTube also helps
- 14:34feed Gemini which is incredibly helpful
- 14:37for the ask maps feature which we see as
- 14:40becoming the future of local search. So
- 14:43again this GBP and model differences
- 14:47this multi-platform play has very
- 14:49similar equivalents for local space.
- 14:52>> Two articles one written by a human like
- 14:54a journalist and the second written by a
- 14:56by AI
- 14:58and it was like 53% of readers voted
- 15:01afterwards but on a blind test that they
- 15:03preferred the AI written content.
- 15:04>> Wow.
- 15:05>> I think slop is a red herring that
- 15:09is going to be quite quickly disproven.
- 15:13You you can you know it's it's it's a
- 15:14really
- 15:15I'm not saying you're suggesting this
- 15:17but I do think that this idea of
- 15:19if it's written by AI equals slop
- 15:23uh is a stupid one.
- 15:25Um
- 15:26I think AI is more than capable of
- 15:28writing high-quality content,
- 15:30high-quality marketing. It's just that
- 15:33the way to think about it is that the
- 15:34consumer is super intelligent now.
- 15:36So, you as a brand
- 15:39or a marketer, you need to tell Claude
- 15:43something it doesn't know.
- 15:44>> Mhm.
- 15:45>> How do you tell a super intelligent
- 15:46being something it doesn't know already
- 15:49when it's been trained on the entire
- 15:50internet?
- 15:51>> Mhm.
- 15:52How do you?
- 15:53>> [laughter]
- 15:53>> What What do you say?
- 15:54>> Have original insight. You know, really
- 15:56humans are this kind of fleshy API
- 16:00between reality and
- 16:02the internet at this point, right?
- 16:04>> agree. And if we're talking about
- 16:06writing content for SEO, writing content
- 16:09for AI systems, what we want to do is
- 16:11take a look at the content that already
- 16:13exists about that topic, and then write
- 16:15something similar to it, but add unique
- 16:18insights, add more information that
- 16:20isn't already on the other results that
- 16:23are ranking nearby. So, every time we're
- 16:25writing content for local SEO, we're
- 16:27always starting our step one is going to
- 16:30be to do research about that exact
- 16:33service we're writing content about. Not
- 16:35just the service, that exact service in
- 16:37that exact city, okay? So, we're going
- 16:39to look at Google's people also ask
- 16:41questions. We're going to look at
- 16:42Reddit. We're going to look at Facebook
- 16:43forms. We're going to look at the
- 16:44competitor websites. We're going to look
- 16:46at other local forms. We're going to
- 16:48find out what are people actually asking
- 16:50about for that service in that local
- 16:53city, and then we're going to write
- 16:54about that. We're going to make sure
- 16:56that is included in our local articles,
- 16:59okay? This point that he's making,
- 17:01original insight, is the moat. Original
- 17:04insight is what gets you cited, what
- 17:06gets you ranked. So, that means the
- 17:09original insight, it's first-party
- 17:12operational truth, right? That means
- 17:14your service area. That means your
- 17:15photos, your reviews, your actual
- 17:17problems you can solve, your properly
- 17:19categorized service list. This is
- 17:21exactly why the system that we use, that
- 17:24we call the core 30, this is exactly why
- 17:26it works. It's not clevered content, it
- 17:29is structured truth that is designed to
- 17:32build this trust with these AI systems
- 17:35that exactly match your website to your
- 17:38GBP, to what people are actually asking
- 17:40about in your area.
- 17:42>> I'd love to chat about
- 17:45dead internet theory.
- 17:47Like,
- 17:48at what point do you think the internet
- 17:49is just primarily being browsed by
- 17:51agents? And at that point,
- 17:53you know, does a company's
- 17:55marketing website matter at all? Does a
- 17:57company's, you know, ranking in the
- 17:59search engine, in the traditional search
- 18:01engines, matter at all? Or should we all
- 18:03just have a read me file for the agents
- 18:05to crawl?
- 18:07>> I mean, at the risk of sounding a little
- 18:08dramatic, I think that we could
- 18:10experience a dead internet outcome in
- 18:12the next 3 years.
- 18:13Um, I do think it's possible. Um, you
- 18:15know, maybe not likely, um, but, you
- 18:17know, what does that mean? It means that
- 18:19in a world where humans just speak to AI
- 18:22to get the responses that they need,
- 18:25the incentive to publish content
- 18:29diminishes
- 18:31to the point of zero.
- 18:32Meaning, you know, we rely, as humans
- 18:34today,
- 18:35>> This is a strange dichotomy from his
- 18:38earlier stance about writing content for
- 18:41the AI systems. Now he's saying there's
- 18:43no benefit to writing content, but if
- 18:45the AI systems are reading it, absorbing
- 18:48it, and providing advice to their users
- 18:50based on the content, you still have the
- 18:53advantage, you still have the incentive
- 18:56to write content, even if it's not for
- 18:58humans.
- 18:58>> and AI rely, we we underestimate just
- 19:02how much we rely on first-party
- 19:05reporting to to feed the information
- 19:08that AI uses to answer questions or to
- 19:10feed the information that appears in a
- 19:11search engine that we rely on every day.
- 19:14And I think in a world where humans no
- 19:16longer click into websites, the majority
- 19:19of the internet is still funded by
- 19:20advertising
- 19:21for a start. So, you know, most
- 19:23publishers rely heavily on advertising
- 19:25revenue
- 19:26to to fuel all of the content that is
- 19:30being more and more consumed by AI.
- 19:32>> Mhm.
- 19:32>> In a world where consumers, humans
- 19:35aren't visiting those web pages anymore,
- 19:38well, what's the you know, what's the
- 19:39point in advertising on a web page that
- 19:41a human isn't visiting?
- 19:42>> Mhm.
- 19:42>> Then their business model breaks, the
- 19:43economics of the internet break, and the
- 19:46incentives to create editorial content
- 19:51are removed.
- 19:52>> Yep.
- 19:52>> And then in that world, you start to ask
- 19:55the question, well, where does AI go to
- 19:57answer these questions?
- 19:59>> To the readme files.
- 20:01>> But then who Why would you publish a
- 20:02readme file?
- 20:05>> Cuz the agent needs to go somewhere to
- 20:06answer a question, right?
- 20:07>> It works if you're a brand or a
- 20:08marketer, but why would you you know,
- 20:10would you publish a blog? What's the
- 20:11point?
- 20:12>> I publish a hi, I'm Sonya the the VC,
- 20:15and these are the companies I've worked
- 20:17with. And in in like as a you know,
- 20:19founders trying to reason through which
- 20:20venture capitalist I work with, I get
- 20:23finds my readme file.
- 20:24>> I think that's correct for
- 20:26>> Yeah.
- 20:28Measured agreement with what he's saying
- 20:29here. The incentive structures are
- 20:31breaking, and this is challenging, it's
- 20:34problematic, it's a problem to figure
- 20:36out. But honestly, the one category that
- 20:39at least for now is essentially
- 20:41structurally immune to this is local
- 20:43service businesses. Because at the end
- 20:45of the query, there still has to be a
- 20:47human with a wrench who can fix the
- 20:51thing, okay? Agents can research, they
- 20:53can compare, they can recommend. As of
- 20:55yet, they can't actually unclog a drain.
- 20:58Now, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic,
- 21:01thinks that's coming in the next 5 to 10
- 21:03years, but that seems soon.
- 21:05Google knows this. That's why they
- 21:07rolled out Ask Maps. Now, Google has
- 21:10publicly described the future of search
- 21:12as basically an agentic search manager.
- 21:16Ask Maps launched as Google's first
- 21:18agentic consumer project for Ask Maps
- 21:21launched as Google's first agentic
- 21:23consumer product for local discovery.
- 21:26The signal to this is that Google is
- 21:27conceding discovery to AI across the
- 21:30board, except they're building their own
- 21:32agent specifically for local because GBP
- 21:35is a data moat that no one else has.
- 21:38Lily Ray did analysis on this and that
- 21:40showed that AI mode sites GBPs more than
- 21:43any other external websites for local
- 21:45queries. That's what I mean when I talk
- 21:47about how the GBP is the center of your
- 21:50business's entity. So, he's right that
- 21:53the internet very likely could break,
- 21:56but what he's missing is that Google
- 21:58already knows where the next moat is and
- 22:01it's the category with a human at the
- 22:03end of every single query. Local. GBP is
- 22:06their data moat. GBPs will keep people
- 22:09and AI systems coming back. The core 30
- 22:13is how you defend it. Now, this isn't
- 22:15the end of local SEO, it's the beginning
- 22:17of local AEO to borrow a silly acronym,
- 22:22but AEO is fundamentally 90-95% the same
- 22:26thing as local SEO. It looks so much
- 22:30like the local SEO that you've already
- 22:31been doing. There's just more at stake
- 22:34because of the podium is getting
- 22:36smaller. So, I want to come back to
- 22:37something he said about the dead
- 22:38internet theory. I've been thinking
- 22:40about this. I filmed that original video
- 22:41a couple days ago and I just couldn't
- 22:43get this out of my head, so I felt
- 22:44compelled to come back and add this. I
- 22:47think he's wrong about what happens
- 22:49next. His argument is that the internet
- 22:51dies because the ad-funded content goes
- 22:53away. Publishers stop publishing,
- 22:55bloggers stop blogging. No humans
- 22:57clicking means no ad revenue means no
- 22:59reason to create. Fine. That part
- 23:01probably does collapse or at least
- 23:03suffers a lot. But look, a huge chunk of
- 23:06the internet is not ad-funded. It's
- 23:08people trying to sell you something.
- 23:10It's people trying to convince you of
- 23:12something. It's brands, it's affiliates,
- 23:13it's consultants posting thought
- 23:15leadership, it's local businesses
- 23:17writing about their services. None of
- 23:19that goes away when the ad tier dies.
- 23:21They're not writing for ad revenue.
- 23:23They're writing to influence. And in a
- 23:25world where LLMs are the new front door,
- 23:28what do you think that group people
- 23:30does? They don't stop publishing. They
- 23:32publish more. They publish specifically
- 23:34to feed the models. They publish to get
- 23:36cited. They publish so their brand shows
- 23:38up when an agent is making a buying or
- 23:41influencing decision on behalf of a
- 23:42customer. So the internet doesn't die.
- 23:45It gets worse than dead. The
- 23:47disinterested content, the hobbyist
- 23:50writing about their niche, the
- 23:51journalist covering something because it
- 23:53matters, the person just sharing what
- 23:55they learned, that's the stuff with the
- 23:57weakest incentive to keep going. That
- 24:00dies first. What survives is content
- 24:03with an agenda attached to it.
- 24:05Commercial content, persuasion content,
- 24:07content written by people who want
- 24:09something from you. And all of that is
- 24:12now feeding the LLMs, which means that
- 24:15the models are being trained and
- 24:16grounded on an internet where every
- 24:18remaining voice has a motive. That's not
- 24:20dead, that's worse than dead. That's a
- 24:23propaganda layer dressed up as an answer
- 24:26engine.
- 24:28Okay, wow. That feels negative to say.
- 24:30Now, if you want to go deeper on where
- 24:32this is all heading, the Google CEO did
- 24:34an interview recently where he walked
- 24:36through exactly this. The agentic search
- 24:38manager, the handoff layer, the role of
- 24:40maps in all of this. I have a full
- 24:42breakdown to that interview linked up
- 24:44top. It's the perfect companion if you
- 24:46thought this was an interesting video.
- 24:48And honestly, the two together give you
- 24:50the complete picture of where search is
- 24:52going in the next 12 months. Watch that
- 24:55next.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The Future Of SEO Is Scary by Caleb Ulku, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,386 words across 715 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.