The Complete Guide to Socialism vs Capitalism (Myths Explained) — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00The new book, It's Okay to Be Angry
- 0:02About Capitalism.
- 0:03>> People eagerly find fault with
- 0:05capitalism.
- 0:06>> If capitalism works, if this is the best
- 0:08we got, why does it seem to give such a
- 0:12raw deal?
- 0:13>> A raw deal. Is that what we get? I hear
- 0:16that often
- 0:17>> in capitalist society. The people who
- 0:19work the hardest make the least amount
- 0:20of money.
- 0:21>> We can either have extreme wealth
- 0:24inequality or we can have a fair
- 0:27economy. Many people are upset about
- 0:29America's big differences in wealth and
- 0:32they say socialism would just be better.
- 0:35Socialism is the way forward.
- 0:40>> It's time to take a closer look at the
- 0:42socialism these people want.
- 0:45>> THIS IS WAR.
- 0:47>> WE ARE COMMITTED TO transforming our
- 0:48society into [music] one based on
- 0:50freedom, equality, and solidarity. The
- 0:53belief that socialism will bring that is
- 0:56why it's now as popular as capitalism
- 0:58among young people.
- 1:02Another big reason is oddly this
- 1:0490year-old linguist Nome Chsky.
- 1:09Students study his work in class and
- 1:11colleges pay him up to $30,000 to speak.
- 1:14>> Thanks very much.
- 1:16>> Yet for generations, Chsky misled
- 1:18students by calling capitalism a
- 1:20grotesque catastrophe.
- 1:23>> [cheering]
- 1:24>> I thought the fall of Soviet communism
- 1:26would put an end to such nonsense.
- 1:28Surely everyone would now see the
- 1:31catastrophe is socialism. [cheering]
- 1:34But no, socialism has come back strong.
- 1:37So in this video, we'll bust five myths
- 1:39about socialism and even more myths
- 1:42about capitalism. We start with
- 1:44socialism and the claim that that wasn't
- 1:47real socialism.
- 1:51the Soviet Union. This was about as
- 1:53remote from socialism as you can
- 1:55imagine.
- 1:55>> It's absurd to say that the Soviet Union
- 1:58was remote from socialism.
- 2:00>> Economist Ben Powell reminds us that
- 2:02when the Soviets made private business
- 2:04illegal,
- 2:05>> that's about as close as the world ever
- 2:07saw to the pure socialist end of the
- 2:09spectrum.
- 2:09>> But whenever socialism fails, people
- 2:11always say that wasn't real socialism.
- 2:14It doesn't prove anything about
- 2:16socialism in other countries. Working
- 2:18people have to be in control of
- 2:20production. The Soviet Union is the
- 2:21exact opposite of that. Working people
- 2:23had no control over anything.
- 2:25>> But that's the problem. That is what
- 2:27socialism inevitably delivers.
- 2:30>> Socialism means abolishing private
- 2:32property in the major things that go
- 2:34into production and replacing it with
- 2:36some form of collective ownership. In
- 2:38practice, this means state ownership and
- 2:41control. And the Soviet Union had an
- 2:43abundance of that. Of [music]
- 2:46course, the Soviet Union is now gone.
- 2:49So, some say there is no true socialist
- 2:52country that exists today. But there is.
- 2:54Look at Venezuela. Just eating is a
- 2:57luxury.
- 2:58>> When I say socialism created hardship
- 3:00there, people trash me in my own social
- 3:03media. Read a book. Venezuela is not
- 3:06socialist. Think a bit. I'll do better
- 3:09than that. I'll listen to the politician
- 3:11who wrecked Venezuela.
- 3:15Because capitalism is tyranny, Hugo
- 3:18Chavez said his government must take
- 3:20over businesses.
- 3:28>> That's socialism. The socialists turned
- 3:30the richest country in Latin America,
- 3:33the nation with the biggest oil reserves
- 3:35in the world, into the poorest country.
- 3:38>> But it's not clear that that crisis has
- 3:40anything to do with their socialist
- 3:41policies.
- 3:42>> That's myth two. Venezuela's failure has
- 3:45little to do with socialism and a lot to
- 3:47do with poor governance. Some of
- 3:49Chavez's programs could have been
- 3:50sustainable if he pursued a sound
- 3:53economic policy.
- 3:55>> Yeah, some of his policies could be
- 3:56sustainable if he had a sound economic
- 3:58policy called capitalism.
- 4:00>> Why does it have to be capitalism?
- 4:01Oliver is saying if he just managed it
- 4:04better. It's a story about epic
- 4:06mismanagement. Or here's how El Jazer
- 4:08puts it. Economic policies have failed
- 4:11to adjust to reality. That's the nature
- 4:13of socialism is for their economic
- 4:14policies to fail to adjust to reality
- 4:17because economic reality is evolving
- 4:19every day. It's millions of
- 4:21decentralized entrepreneurs and
- 4:22consumers who are making fine-tuning
- 4:24adjustments to this
- 4:25>> in our capitalist society. When CO hit,
- 4:28>> what did we start seeing? Millions of
- 4:30entrepreneurs adjusting without
- 4:31government orders of how to deliver
- 4:33their products and services.
- 4:35>> Servers have switched roles to delivery
- 4:36drivers while bartenders have turned
- 4:38into sales reps. restaurants, installed
- 4:40the heat lamps, expanded patios, did
- 4:43delivery.
- 4:44>> Although reporters complained about the
- 4:46absence of federal direction, no central
- 4:49authority could possibly direct all
- 4:51these individual adjustments in
- 4:53thousands of different places. In fact,
- 4:56federal direction would have prevented
- 4:58all that.
- 4:58>> In a market economy, the great thing is
- 5:01everybody's little adjustments gets
- 5:03tested and we get to see what works.
- 5:05Blockbuster video. [music]
- 5:07>> Blockbuster was great, but then people
- 5:09were offered something better. TV shows
- 5:11and movies at your command. By contrast,
- 5:14>> in a socialist economy, you get a
- 5:16one-sizefits-all adjustment, and you
- 5:18miss out on this learning process where
- 5:20some entrepreneurs copy others when they
- 5:22see things successful, and they stop
- 5:24doing it when it's not.
- 5:25>> For example, East Germany's socialist
- 5:27planners pushed these Trabons.
- 5:30>> They said the cars were great.
- 5:34But it was a terrible car, hard to drive
- 5:38and it spewed pollution.
- 5:40>> Even when West Germans were building
- 5:41Volkswagons, BMWs and Porsches,
- 5:46East Germans were stuck with Trabants.
- 5:48>> In a socialist economy, every one of the
- 5:51minor adjustments needs to be commanded.
- 5:53One mind who has to know all of those
- 5:54teeny adjustments, communicate it down,
- 5:56and get everybody to do the right thing.
- 5:59That's impossible. No government
- 6:01department can manage millions of
- 6:03individual decisions in prices. When
- 6:05they try, shortages occur and money
- 6:08loses value.
- 6:10>> If you work the whole month, you can buy
- 6:13one a hamburger.
- 6:14>> Here's another excuse for Venezuela's
- 6:17failure.
- 6:17>> Oil prices plummeted in 2014 and Maduro
- 6:20failed to adjust.
- 6:21>> Vox made this video called the collapse
- 6:24of Venezuela explained. In the whole
- 6:27video, they never mention socialism
- 6:29once. They blame falling oil prices.
- 6:32>> The oil price is a complete distraction.
- 6:34There's plenty of countries around the
- 6:36world that depend on oil revenue. When
- 6:38oil prices went down, they people there
- 6:40didn't start losing weight. That just
- 6:42happened in Venezuela.
- 6:43>> Some people respond to my videos by
- 6:45saying, "People in Venezuela and Cuba
- 6:48struggle not because of socialism, but
- 6:51because of our sanctions and embargo.
- 6:54They certainly don't help the people,
- 6:56but it's an afterthought as a reason for
- 6:58their suffering.
- 6:59>> In Cuba,
- 7:00>> they drive around 1950s US cars, but we
- 7:02don't have a blockade on them. There's
- 7:04no US Navy destroyers preventing Kia,
- 7:07Fiat, or whoever else around the world
- 7:09from sending them cars. The reason for
- 7:10their suffering is they have an economic
- 7:12system that can't deliver.
- 7:14>> Here's myth number three. Socialism does
- 7:16bring good things. if it's democratic
- 7:19socialism.
- 7:20>> The examples of failed socialism that
- 7:22critics use are not socialist
- 7:23democracies but authoritarian states.
- 7:26>> Democratic socialists denounce [music]
- 7:28all that. The key word for them,
- 7:29democratic. They believe that both the
- 7:32government and the economy should be run
- 7:33by the people by [music] way of the
- 7:35ballot box.
- 7:37[screaming]
- 7:40>> But Venezuela's socialist was elected.
- 7:46They can start off democratically
- 7:48elected and then once they centralize
- 7:50control over the economy, it becomes
- 7:52impossible to democratically unelect
- 7:55them. Now Maduro rules while ordering
- 7:58state employees to vote for him or they
- 8:00lose their job.
- 8:00>> Maduro blatantly buying votes.
- 8:03>> They put food aid stations next to
- 8:05polling places and you get rewarded with
- 8:07rations if you vote correctly. Now
- 8:09democracy there is a sham.
- 8:11>> It always becomes authoritarian. Always.
- 8:13Everywhere you try socialism, that's
- 8:15what you get.
- 8:16>> Why?
- 8:16>> It's hard to exercise political freedom
- 8:19if you don't have economic freedoms. If
- 8:20you're dependent upon the state for your
- 8:22livelihood, you lose your ability to use
- 8:24your voice to oppose them because you
- 8:26can be punished.
- 8:27>> But unfortunately, people don't realize
- 8:29that when they're promoting democratic
- 8:31socialism.
- 8:32>> Democratic [music] socialism is your
- 8:34kids public school.
- 8:35>> It's the researchers and scientists paid
- 8:37with our taxes.
- 8:38>> It's our interstate [music] highway
- 8:39system.
- 8:40>> We're not purely capitalist. There are
- 8:41some industries that are
- 8:43governmentowned, operated, and
- 8:44controlled, socialized, if you will.
- 8:46It's no accident that when you look at
- 8:48these and think about things that are
- 8:50inefficiently done and underperforming,
- 8:52our public education, our congested
- 8:54streets, these socialized industries
- 8:57don't work well.
- 8:57>> But what about Norway? It's as socialist
- 9:00as they come.
- 9:01>> Instead of Cuba or China, think [music]
- 9:04Sweden.
- 9:05>> Myth four, socialism does work well in
- 9:08Scandinavia. But Scandinavian countries
- 9:11are not socialist.
- 9:12>> Sweden isn't socialist. Volvo is a
- 9:14private company. Go to restaurants,
- 9:16hotels. They're privately owned. Markets
- 9:18organized the vast majority of of
- 9:20Swedish economic activity.
- 9:22>> But Sweden did have a period in the
- 9:241970s and 1980s when we had something
- 9:27that resembled socialism, a big
- 9:29government that taxed and spend heavily.
- 9:31There were waiting lines to get health
- 9:33care. People couldn't get the pension
- 9:35that they depended on for the future. At
- 9:38that point, the the Swedish population
- 9:39just said, "Enough. We we can't do
- 9:41this."
- 9:41>> So Sweden cut taxes and cut government
- 9:44spending.
- 9:46They privatized trains, sold state-owned
- 9:49businesses.
- 9:50>> When I talk about democratic socialism,
- 9:53I'm looking at countries like Denmark.
- 9:54>> When American politicians wrongly called
- 9:57Scandinavia socialists, Denmark's prime
- 10:00minister came to America to refute them.
- 10:02>> Denmark is far from a socialist planned
- 10:05economy. Denmark is a market economy.
- 10:08>> In fact, Denmark today ranks higher in
- 10:11economic freedom than the US
- 10:13>> with much freedom to pursue your dreams
- 10:15and live your life.
- 10:16>> Finally, myth five, socialism is
- 10:19completely different from fascism when a
- 10:22congressman said
- 10:23>> the potential is out there for another
- 10:26Hitler socialist like Hitler to come
- 10:28along.
- 10:29>> Another congressman said he was wrong.
- 10:31>> It's the Nazis that's terrible, not the
- 10:33socialists. They were Nazis who killed
- 10:34Jews. And I get offended when you
- 10:36compare socialist to Nazis. They were
- 10:38fascists.
- 10:39>> It's true that fascism and socialism
- 10:42aren't exactly the same, but they do
- 10:44have a lot in common.
- 10:45>> They both replace market decision-making
- 10:47with command and control. While
- 10:49socialism abolishes private property and
- 10:51replaces it with state ownership.
- 10:53Fascism leaves private ownership in
- 10:55nominal terms at least, but replaces
- 10:57decision-m with state control and
- 10:59orders. As an average person living your
- 11:02life, whether under socialism or
- 11:03fascism, you lose your autonomy, your
- 11:06control over your own future. Only under
- 11:09capitalism do you have the freedom to
- 11:11say no. Entrepreneurs offer you their
- 11:14services. They offer you employment. You
- 11:17can say no and choose a better path for
- 11:20yourself. You don't get that same type
- 11:21of choice when someone else is planning
- 11:23the economy.
- 11:24>> Powell and another economist wrote a
- 11:26book about socialist countries. We went
- 11:28to socialism 2018, [music]
- 11:31the biggest gathering of young
- 11:33socialists, and they pointed out lots of
- 11:35problems in the United States. Problems
- 11:37with migration, with war, with policing.
- 11:41The problems they were identifying were
- 11:42the product of bad government that the
- 11:44US is giving them, not capitalism.
- 11:46>> Socialism appeals because it promises
- 11:49fairness and equality.
- 11:51>> Resources should be allocated to those
- 11:54who need them. They hear the preaching
- 11:56of socialism about equality, but they
- 11:59don't look on what it actually delivers.
- 12:01The history of humanity is of poverty,
- 12:04starvation, early death. This was true
- 12:07throughout our history until very
- 12:09recently. In the last 20 years, we've
- 12:12seen more humans escape extreme poverty
- 12:14than any other time in human history.
- 12:16And that's because of markets,
- 12:18>> right? Free markets, capitalism, that's
- 12:21what makes us richer. But everywhere
- 12:24people trash capitalism.
- 12:26>> No system has redistributed wealth from
- 12:29the poor to the rich as effectively as
- 12:31our own.
- 12:32>> I call it slavery by another name.
- 12:34>> We covered the biggest myths about
- 12:36socialism. Now we'll bust seven myths
- 12:39about capitalism.
- 12:40>> No one ever makes a billion dollars. You
- 12:43take a billion dollars.
- 12:46>> That's myth one. Capitalists get rich by
- 12:49taking money from others.
- 12:51>> Jeff Bezos has what? $100 billion. Yeah,
- 12:54his wealth is making a lot of people
- 12:56poor.
- 12:56>> People assume that because they think
- 12:58>> we have a finite amount of money,
- 13:00>> a finite amount. So when they win, you
- 13:04lose. But that's not true because
- 13:07entrepreneurs create new wealth.
- 13:09Research shows that when they got rich,
- 13:12they only kept 2.2%
- 13:15of the additional wealth they generated
- 13:16for the economy.
- 13:18>> Economist Dan Mitchell. In other words,
- 13:20the rest of us captured almost 98% of
- 13:23the benefits.
- 13:24>> Today, Apple is going to reinvent the
- 13:27phone.
- 13:28>> Yes, Steve Jobs kept billions.
- 13:32But by creating Apple, he gave us more.
- 13:35So many new jobs. And he added billions
- 13:38to our economy. All by creating tech
- 13:41[music] that makes our lives better. I
- 13:43hope that we get a hundred new super
- 13:45billionaires because that means that
- 13:48there's a hundred new people who have
- 13:50figured out ways to make the rest of our
- 13:52lives better off.
- 13:53>> Let's abolish billionaires. This former
- 13:54labor secretary says entrepreneurs like
- 13:57Jeff Bezos would be just as motivated by
- 13:59say a h 100red million or even $50
- 14:02million. Oo, but he misses the most
- 14:06important fact about capitalism. I'm not
- 14:08giving Jeff Bezos any money unless he's
- 14:11selling me something that I value more
- 14:14than that money.
- 14:16>> Billionaires.
- 14:18>> No one deserves to have that much money.
- 14:20>> None of these zillionaires needs that
- 14:22much money.
- 14:23>> If you put a cap on how much money
- 14:25someone can make, are they going to
- 14:26continue innovating? No. Maybe you just
- 14:29decide to take it easy. You retire, you
- 14:32sell a yacht around the world, you're
- 14:33going to start consuming instead of
- 14:36saving and producing. When I say things
- 14:38like that, people call me a complete
- 14:40and tweet, "More money in the
- 14:43richest hands means money sitting in the
- 14:45bank doing nothing."
- 14:48But that's an ignorant view of banks. In
- 14:51reality,
- 14:52>> that money gets lent out,
- 14:54>> which allows other people to build
- 14:56businesses, buy homes, get educated,
- 14:59>> new machinery, tools, factories,
- 15:01equipment, technology. Still, we hear
- 15:04>> the rich getting richer and the poor
- 15:06getting poorer.
- 15:07>> That's myth, too. The truth is that the
- 15:10poor and middle class are getting
- 15:12richer, too.
- 15:13>> The economic pie grows. We are much
- 15:16richer than our grandparents and our
- 15:18grandparents were much richer than their
- 15:20grandparents.
- 15:21>> For thousands of years, the world had
- 15:23almost no wealth creation. Then some
- 15:26countries tried capitalism.
- 15:28>> You can see that per capita GDP is
- 15:30climbing and climbing and climbing.
- 15:32Capitalists helped everyone, including
- 15:35the poor.
- 15:36>> They do by bringing cheaper and better
- 15:37food to my supermarket. They do it by
- 15:40providing better goods and services.
- 15:42>> So high-tech, it could only come from
- 15:43Motorola.
- 15:44>> Look how communications changed. 25
- 15:47years ago, phones looked like this. Then
- 15:49we got the Blackberry, the iPhone.
- 15:51>> Way smarter than any mobile device has
- 15:53ever been.
- 15:54>> Now we have cheap smartphones. When the
- 15:57media say
- 15:57>> the middle class is in decline,
- 15:59>> America's middle class is in decline.
- 16:01>> Well, they're right. But they miss why
- 16:03>> it's shrinking because more and more
- 16:05people are moving into those upper
- 16:07income quentiles.
- 16:09The rich get richer in a capitalist
- 16:11society. But guess what? The rest of us
- 16:13get richer as well.
- 16:15>> The average family today is almost a
- 16:17third richer than 40 years ago because
- 16:20capitalists compete to get our dollars.
- 16:23Of course, this assumes there's
- 16:25competition. But I'm told that's no
- 16:27longer true. In fact, I'm a miserable,
- 16:30selfish pig for not saying that
- 16:32monopolies destroyed the free market.
- 16:35Some Republicans and Democrats say
- 16:38that's why tech companies must be broken
- 16:40up.
- 16:41>> Calling Facebook, Amazon, and Apple all
- 16:43monopolies.
- 16:44>> But are they really monopolies?
- 16:46>> We do have monopolies. The government
- 16:48school system, the postal service,
- 16:51monopolies are almost always a creation
- 16:54of government intervention,
- 16:56>> blocking competition, for example.
- 16:58>> Keeping your phone system the best in
- 17:00the world.
- 17:01>> Government granted Ma Bell a monopoly on
- 17:03phone calls. And in 30 years, their
- 17:06phones went from this to well, just
- 17:09this.
- 17:10>> Always improving. That's the Bell system
- 17:13for you.
- 17:13>> A short phone call cost $17.
- 17:16Ma Bell got away with that because
- 17:19government banned competition. In
- 17:20>> a free market economy, it's impossible
- 17:23to have a monopoly because if somebody
- 17:25manages to get a lot of market share and
- 17:28they try to raise prices, new
- 17:30competitors are going to spring up and
- 17:32they're going to draw away the
- 17:33customers.
- 17:35[music and singing]
- 17:36>> That happened to Blockbuster. It charged
- 17:38late fees. Netflix promised no late
- 17:41fees.
- 17:43>> [music and singing]
- 17:44>> Blockbusters soon went out of business.
- 17:46But people say today's tech companies
- 17:48are uniquely powerful. No one can
- 17:51compete with them.
- 17:52>> I use Duck.Go as my search engine. I
- 17:55don't use Google. But guess what? Even
- 17:57if I used Google and Facebook for 10
- 17:59hours a day, no one's holding a gun to
- 18:02my head. They're they're obviously
- 18:04providing something of value. Heck,
- 18:05they're providing free search engines,
- 18:07free social media. Just 14 years ago,
- 18:10people called MySpace a monopoly. Then
- 18:13Facebook proved them wrong. Our
- 18:15government once called US Steel, Panama,
- 18:17IBM, Internet Explorer, and Kodak
- 18:20monopolies. That's something to consider
- 18:23next time you hear big tech are the
- 18:25robber barons of the 21st century.
- 18:29>> Robberons like Rockefeller and
- 18:31Vanderbilt. And we'll get to them
- 18:33shortly. But first, myth four. Free
- 18:36markets create unsafe workplaces. Only
- 18:39government through agencies like OSHA
- 18:42can stop that. I've had some show me
- 18:44charts showing, oh, look at how
- 18:46workplace fatalities have come down ever
- 18:49since OSHA was created. Well, I actually
- 18:52went to that same data source and I
- 18:54looked at the decades before OSHA was
- 18:56created.
- 18:57>> No wonder the bureaucrats don't show us
- 18:59that. Fatality rates were already going
- 19:02down just as fast. Why?
- 19:04>> As we become richer, we become safer.
- 19:08>> The wealth capitalism creates lets us
- 19:10afford safety devices and build machines
- 19:13to do the most dangerous work.
- 19:16>> In capitalist societies, we have cleaner
- 19:19water, cleaner air, better lifestyles.
- 19:23We need more capitalism because when
- 19:25people get rich, they can afford more
- 19:27safety. But before government protected
- 19:29us, I'm told unfettered capitalism
- 19:32created evil robber barons. Collecting
- 19:35great riches at the expense of [music]
- 19:37workers who toiled often in dangerous
- 19:39conditions for little pay. But little
- 19:41pay compared to what?
- 19:43>> When we look back upon factory life 100
- 19:46years ago, we think, "Oh my god, that's
- 19:47terrible." Because by our standards
- 19:49today, it is terrible. But compared to
- 19:51toiling for 14 hours a day on a farm for
- 19:54half as much money, that stage of our
- 19:57economic development was practically
- 19:59nirvana.
- 20:00>> Still, most people were poor while the
- 20:03robber barons amassed a huge amount of
- 20:05wealth. Folks like John D. Rockefeller,
- 20:07who created the oil industry.
- 20:09>> People still call Rockefeller a robber
- 20:11baron, but he wasn't born rich, and he
- 20:14didn't rob. Rockefeller got rich by
- 20:16inventing ways to deliver oil for less.
- 20:19>> John D. Rockefeller kept lowering the
- 20:21price. That's why he got more market
- 20:23share.
- 20:24>> No one was forced to buy his oil. And
- 20:26although the media implied that people
- 20:28suffered [snorts] to support the fat
- 20:30cats, the entrepreneurs innovations
- 20:33actually made almost everyone better
- 20:35off.
- 20:36>> In the 1800s, the era of the so-called
- 20:38robber barons. We went from agricultural
- 20:42poverty to a country characterized by
- 20:45middle class prosperity.
- 20:46>> Cornelius Vanderbilt was another tycoon.
- 20:49the anti- capitalist media called a
- 20:51robber baron. But he too was no baron.
- 20:54He was born poor. At age 11, he quit
- 20:57school to work on boats.
- 21:00Then he invented ways to make travel
- 21:02cheaper. He cut the New York Hartford
- 21:04fair from $5 to $1. His competitors
- 21:08didn't bother because they were used to
- 21:10friendly politicians giving them
- 21:12subsidies. That's not capitalism. That's
- 21:15corporatism. Only when politicians leave
- 21:18capitalism largely alone does it create
- 21:21wealth. Still, I hear that capitalism
- 21:24just isn't good for us.
- 21:26>> Capitalism is not designed to optimize
- 21:28our well-being.
- 21:29>> Does anyone still believe that cheaper
- 21:31iPhones or more Amazon deliveries of
- 21:33plastic garbage from China are going to
- 21:35make us happy?
- 21:36>> We're not buying iPhones and plastic
- 21:38garbage unless we think it's better for
- 21:40us than the dollars that we have in our
- 21:42bank accounts. Capitalism is the only
- 21:45system that gives people the liberty to
- 21:48make their own choices. I want liberty.
- 21:51>> However, now I'm told
- 21:52>> a robot is probably going to take your
- 21:55job.
- 21:55>> That's our last myth. Capitalism will
- 21:58take away everyone's job.
- 22:00>> 50% of the workforce being completely
- 22:03eliminated, as in no more jobs for them.
- 22:06For years, experts predicted employment
- 22:08will decline, but so far it's never
- 22:11happened. When markets are free, some
- 22:13people do lose jobs, and that's hard on
- 22:16them and their families.
- 22:17>> If I was a typewriter builder 30 years
- 22:20ago, the personal computer probably
- 22:23destroyed my job. If I was a candle
- 22:25maker, electricity destroyed my job.
- 22:29>> It's upsetting when any person loses a
- 22:31job. But overall, capitalism creates
- 22:35millions more jobs. When America began,
- 22:3890% of workers worked on farms. Now
- 22:40fewer than 2% do farm workers found
- 22:44better jobs.
- 22:45>> As long as our economy has the dynamism
- 22:47that free markets allow, we're going to
- 22:49see more job creation and higher income
- 22:52levels. And that's what makes the
- 22:53children and grandchildren of typewriter
- 22:56makers so much better off
- 22:58>> and steering on its own.
- 23:00>> Now truck drivers rightly fear
- 23:02self-driving trucks.
- 23:03>> Would you, Tucker Carlson, be in favor
- 23:05of restrictions to use this sort of
- 23:07technology?
- 23:08>> Are you joking? in a second. In a
- 23:11second. In other words, if I were
- 23:13president, we're not letting driverless
- 23:15trucks on the road. Period.
- 23:16>> Support the coalition of obsolete
- 23:18industries.
- 23:19>> But what would happen if politicians did
- 23:21block innovation? This parody lays it
- 23:24out pretty well.
- 23:25>> I used to have to clean people's
- 23:26toilets, empty them from the alleyway
- 23:28behind the house, and now flushing
- 23:29toilets and plumbing has taken away my
- 23:31job.
- 23:31>> Electricity has taken over my
- 23:33profession.
- 23:33>> Well, that sounds like Tucker being
- 23:35worried about driverless trucks. If we
- 23:37don't stop progress, how will anyone
- 23:38ever have jobs?
- 23:41>> Creative destruction does destroy, but
- 23:44what it creates is so much bigger, so
- 23:47much richer, and so much better for us.
- 23:50>> Better for most everyone, rich and poor.
- 23:53That's capitalism.
- 23:55>> That's something that we should be
- 23:56celebrating. No other system anywhere in
- 23:59the world has ever come close to
- 24:00capitalism's ability to generate mass
- 24:03prosperity.
- 24:06Thanks for watching. To help us defend
- 24:08free markets, please click that button.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The Complete Guide to Socialism vs Capitalism (Myths Explained) by John Stossel, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,840 words across 666 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.