The Cambridge Method: Struggle First, Understand Later — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Everyone tells you just how brilliant
- 0:02Cambridge is for studying maths.
- 0:05Cambridge has some of the best
- 0:06researchers in the world teaching
- 0:08undergraduate students topics that
- 0:09they've spent their whole career
- 0:10studying. But they might be the best at
- 0:12research, but they're definitely not the
- 0:14best at teaching. The Cambridge lectures
- 0:16are fast definition here, a theorem
- 0:18there, and then a proof left as an
- 0:20exercise to the reader. Then they move
- 0:21on, and they expect you to keep up. And
- 0:24not just to cope, but to be the best in
- 0:26the world at it. That's the teaching.
- 0:29That's it. So why do the people who
- 0:31survive that end up running math
- 0:33departments and winning fields medals?
- 0:35Well, Cambridge have a different way of
- 0:36making the best mathematicians and it's
- 0:38not teaching but training. Now, let me
- 0:41be precise because I'm not saying
- 0:43lectures are bad. They're probably world
- 0:45class in their field. Some of them have
- 0:46wrote the thing that they're actually
- 0:48lecturing on. I'm saying the teaching,
- 0:50the actual process of moving information
- 0:52from one brain into another, in my
- 0:54opinion, is barely attempted. And I
- 0:57don't think that's an accident. I think
- 0:58it's kind of the point. Now, if you know
- 1:01anything about master degree, you're
- 1:02already probably objecting to what I'm
- 1:03saying. 12 lectures a week, uh, end of
- 1:06year exams, proofs left as an exercise,
- 1:09that's Warick, that's Imperial, that's
- 1:10Durham, that's every researchheavy math
- 1:13department in the country. And to be
- 1:15fair, you're right. So, let me bit more
- 1:17specific about what makes Cambridge the
- 1:19extreme case rather than just another
- 1:20example of the same type. It's the pace.
- 1:23It's the volume. Material that's a full
- 1:25module elsewhere is often half a module
- 1:27at Cambridge. The math tripos covers
- 1:29more ground faster than pretty much
- 1:31everywhere else in the world and they
- 1:33test you on some of the hardest
- 1:35questions that you've barely been
- 1:36taught. It does it while assessing you
- 1:38exactly once in May at the end. Now, in
- 1:41what way is the teaching bad? Well,
- 1:43there's 10 to 12 lectures a week in the
- 1:45first year. You get a new definition, a
- 1:47new theorem, a proof, next, move on. No
- 1:49worked examples in the sense that you
- 1:51know from Alevel. No, let's do one
- 1:53together. The pace just assumes that
- 1:55you've read the content ahead of time.
- 1:56assumes you go home afterwards and spend
- 1:58eight hours understanding the 55 minutes
- 2:00they just gave you. And if you don't,
- 2:02you're behind by Thursday of week one.
- 2:04Then [music] secondly, nothing you do
- 2:06actually counts. Example sheets aren't
- 2:08assessed. Attendance isn't tracked.
- 2:10There's no coursework other than a bit
- 2:11of catam in the second year. The entire
- 2:14year lands on exams in May, which means
- 2:16the system has no mechanism for noticing
- 2:18you're drowning in the work until it's
- 2:20far too late and there's nothing you can
- 2:22do about it. And then finally,
- 2:24supervisions. Supervisions are the thing
- 2:26that Cambridge sells itself on. It sells
- 2:27it the hardest. And to be fair, it's a
- 2:29lot more contact time than almost any
- 2:31other department in the country office.
- 2:33It's one or two students with an expert
- 2:35in that field for a full hour. And when
- 2:37it's good, it's the best teaching in my
- 2:39opinion in British higher education. But
- 2:41nothing actually controls that variance.
- 2:43Sometimes you get someone who transforms
- 2:45how you think about maths. Sometimes you
- 2:47get a second year PhD student who is, to
- 2:50be fair, amazing at what they're
- 2:51researching, but isn't really up to
- 2:54scratch with considering how a
- 2:5519-year-old learns maths. Most of the
- 2:57time, it's just students desperate not
- 2:59to embarrass themselves that's forcing
- 3:00them to keep up with the course. And
- 3:03even if you get a good supervisor, it's
- 3:051 hour once a fortnight. It's nowhere
- 3:07near enough to carry you through an
- 3:08entire course of something you're
- 3:10struggling with. that hour is the only
- 3:12thing that standing between a really
- 3:14struggling student and a year that they
- 3:16just can't recover from and just nobody
- 3:18actually checks whether it's any good
- 3:19for the student whether they're actually
- 3:21making any progress. So with all this
- 3:24going wrong, why does Cambridge end up
- 3:26with such good mathematicians even
- 3:27though the teaching seems to be
- 3:28absolutely non-existent? Well, from what
- 3:31you'd probably expect and what I did
- 3:33expect when I went here, non-existent
- 3:35teaching should lead to the worst
- 3:36students. However, something happens
- 3:39when you get no help. When nobody
- 3:41explains it to you, then you have to
- 3:43explain it to yourself. And explain
- 3:45something to yourself is not the same
- 3:46activity as being explained to. It's a
- 3:49completely different process and a
- 3:50different result. With good teaching,
- 3:53the kind we're all trained to want and
- 3:54to get from A levels, it hands you a
- 3:57clean path through the material. You
- 3:59follow it, it makes sense, you feel the
- 4:00click. The problem is that by following
- 4:02somebody else's path, you don't actually
- 4:05stray from that path. you don't
- 4:07understand why things work and why they
- 4:09don't work and you don't find alternate
- 4:11paths that might just work. Change the
- 4:14question slightly and the path that you
- 4:15knew and loved completely disappears cuz
- 4:18you never built it. You just walk down a
- 4:19path that somebody else taught you. Now
- 4:21the reason why Cambridge doesn't like
- 4:23teaching is because they don't give you
- 4:24the path. So you work out where that
- 4:27theorem came from. What breaks if you
- 4:28drop a hypothesis, why the proof goes
- 4:30that way and not the obvious way. When
- 4:33you explain it to yourself, you have to
- 4:34critique and understand every single
- 4:36angle to truly understand it. And the
- 4:39way the example sheets work, you can be
- 4:40sat with a question for like 6 hours. In
- 4:43one specific case, I sat with a problem
- 4:44for 4 days at one point contemplating
- 4:47how much gravity will affect me if I
- 4:48jump out of the second story of the
- 4:50library. But the point is, you get
- 4:52absolutely nowhere. You learn everything
- 4:54that doesn't work. And when you finally
- 4:56get there, you truly understand why it
- 4:59does work. That six hours of getting
- 5:02absolutely nowhere is entirely the
- 5:04point. Everything else is just
- 5:05scaffolding to help you build towards
- 5:07the answer. And I'm trying not to be
- 5:09romantic about suffering. I'm not a
- 5:11masochist. But there is a name for it in
- 5:13science. It's called desirable
- 5:14difficulties. But the short version is
- 5:17conditions that make learning feel
- 5:18slower and worse while it's actually
- 5:20happening produce knowledge that lasts
- 5:22longer and transfers to more things.
- 5:26Struggling to understand something
- 5:27before you're told it beats just being
- 5:29told. Failing at a problem before you
- 5:31see the solution always beats just
- 5:34looking at the solution and going, "Ah,
- 5:35that's the answer." Now, on the back of
- 5:37this, there's probably two questions you
- 5:38might ask. One, aren't students failing
- 5:41in school because of bad teaching?
- 5:42Whereas, I've just claimed that bad
- 5:43teaching leads to good students. And
- 5:45secondly, does Cambridge actually
- 5:47produce good mathematicians or they just
- 5:49have such high standards that they
- 5:51already let in good mathematicians and
- 5:53then just take the credit? And to be
- 5:55fair, you're asking the right questions.
- 5:57But the second question actually answers
- 5:59the first. Cambridge does have pretty
- 6:01much the highest requirements to get in.
- 6:03I mark step papers. I I know it is a
- 6:05really hard exam. It's the hardest one A
- 6:07level students have to go through. It
- 6:09really pushes students to think
- 6:10differently and understand the math that
- 6:12they're doing. So yes, Cambridge does
- 6:14admit some of the best. But that's
- 6:15exactly why this method works. Put a few
- 6:17hundred students like that in one place
- 6:19and they start trying to outwork each
- 6:21other. Most of their waking hours go
- 6:23into the course because everyone around
- 6:25them is doing the same. that peer
- 6:27pressure doesn't exist if you don't
- 6:28admit those people in the first place.
- 6:31Does that mean it's selection rather
- 6:32than training? Well, partly yes. I'm not
- 6:35going to pretend otherwise, but I think
- 6:37the honest version is that it's both.
- 6:38The system selects the best students and
- 6:40then it forces those best students to
- 6:42develop and really learn as quickly at a
- 6:45scale that nobody would choose to do
- 6:46voluntarily. A lot of people put
- 6:48themselves through quite a lot at
- 6:50Cambridge. A lot of them arrive able to
- 6:51sit with a hard problem for maybe an
- 6:53hour, but when they leave, they're able
- 6:55to sit with a hard problem for like over
- 6:56a week. That's really important because
- 6:58that's what research math is. You sit in
- 7:00front of a problem nobody has ever
- 7:02solved before. There are no lecture
- 7:03notes. There's no supervisor who knows
- 7:05the answer because there is no answer.
- 7:07You just sit with a problem for days and
- 7:09days trying to understand it. And the
- 7:10maths is essentially a three-year
- 7:12rehearsal for exactly that. It isn't
- 7:14badly designed teaching. It's
- 7:16well-designed training that happens to
- 7:18look identical to badly designed
- 7:20teaching from the outside. The people
- 7:21who come out at the end have spent three
- 7:23years building [music] the specific
- 7:24muscle that a researching job requires.
- 7:27Tolerance for not knowing and the habit
- 7:29of sticking with a problem to find out
- 7:31that solution. You can't get that from
- 7:33being spoonfed answers. There is no
- 7:35version of being taught well that also
- 7:36teaches you to work without knowing
- 7:38anything. Okay, so getting on to
- 7:41probably the most important part of this
- 7:42video. You don't need to be at Cambridge
- 7:44to benefit from this system. You can
- 7:46incorporate these habits into your own
- 7:48studies. So before you seek for the
- 7:50solution, sit on it for a while and fail
- 7:53properly. Don't just give up and then
- 7:55look for the answer. [music] You need to
- 7:56give yourself time to make mistakes, try
- 7:58different methods and struggle. That's
- 8:01the important part. 10 minutes, half an
- 8:03hour on paper actually attempting it.
- 8:06The failure is what makes you fully
- 8:07understand. the instinct to go and check
- 8:09the answer as soon as something goes
- 8:11wrong. It's the exact instinct that's
- 8:12just costing you because it feels like
- 8:15efficiency. It feels like you're being
- 8:16super efficient, finding the answer,
- 8:17understanding really quickly, but you're
- 8:19just memorizing their solution. You're
- 8:21not understanding why the solution
- 8:22works. [music]
- 8:23And secondly, bit more of a
- 8:24controversial one. Hold yourself to a
- 8:26very high standard. And I'm not saying
- 8:28do loads and loads and loads of problems
- 8:30just so that you you've done everything
- 8:31and you've you've worked really really
- 8:33hard. I'm saying hold yourself to a high
- 8:35standard when it comes to your
- 8:36understanding. See yourself as a
- 8:38researcher, not just a student. When you
- 8:41start to learn something new, don't just
- 8:43accept it because you've been taught it.
- 8:45Push yourself to develop a deep
- 8:47understanding of why things work and why
- 8:49they don't. That's the entire Cambridge
- 8:52method. It cost you nothing to implement
- 8:54yourself, and nobody has to teach it to
- 8:56you, which is kind of more or less the
- 8:58point of this video. But this is the
- 9:01exact method I used back when I was in
- 9:02Alevel to get the highest grades, 5A
- 9:05starts. I did every module on the
- 9:07further mass and back then the further
- 9:09additional math spec and my school at
- 9:11the time just didn't have anyone who
- 9:13knew the content to be able to teach it
- 9:14to me. So I had to learn it myself and I
- 9:16had to go through this exact method
- 9:18because I just didn't have the
- 9:19solutions. I couldn't look anything up.
- 9:21I just had to struggle with the problem
- 9:23until I understood them and until I got
- 9:25the answers right. So yeah, Cambridge
- 9:28might not have the best teaching, but
- 9:29the Cambridge method of training rather
- 9:31than simply teaching produces not only
- 9:33the best mathematicians in the world,
- 9:35but also some of the best thinkers,
- 9:37people who go on to not just study
- 9:38maths, but maybe philosophy or law. Now,
- 9:42if you're applying for Cambridge or any
- 9:43other university for maths, or even if
- 9:45you're just sitting in first year right
- 9:46now, quietly wondering whether everyone
- 9:48else is finding it as hard as you, they
- 9:50are. It's just nobody wants to say so.
- 9:52Try and implement some of these ideas.
- 9:54See if they can help you level up your
- 9:55math game. see if it helps you with your
- 9:57university maths. And if you've already
- 9:58been through the tripost and have a
- 10:00different view than me, put it in the
- 10:01comments. I'd actually really like to
- 10:02read it. See what you thought of being
- 10:04at Cambridge. But yeah, I'll see you in
- 10:05the next one. Bye.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The Cambridge Method: Struggle First, Understand Later by Ryan Ward, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,128 words across 317 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.