The best way to become good at something might surprise you - David Epstein — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:07Many of you here have probably heard of the 10,000 hours rule.
- 0:10It’s the idea that to become great in anything takes
- 0:1310,000 hours of focused practice.
- 0:15So you’d better get started as early as possible.
- 0:18The poster child for this story is Tiger Woods.
- 0:22His father famously gave him a putter when he was seven months old.
- 0:25Fast forward to the age of 21— he’s the greatest golfer in the world.
- 0:29Quintessential 10,000 hours story.
- 0:31Another is that of the three Polgar sisters,
- 0:33whose father decided to teach them chess in a very technical manner
- 0:36from a very early age.
- 0:38Two of his daughters went on to become grandmaster chess players
- 0:41I got curious: if this 10,000 hours rule is correct,
- 0:43then we should see that elite athletes get a head start
- 0:46in so-called deliberate practice.
- 0:48And in fact, when scientists study elite athletes,
- 0:50they see that they spend more time in deliberate practice.
- 0:53Not a big surprise.
- 0:55When they actually track athletes over the course of their development,
- 0:58the pattern looks like this:
- 0:59the future elites tend to have what scientists call a sampling period,
- 1:03where they try a variety of physical activities.
- 1:05They gain broad general skills and delay specializing
- 1:09until later than peers who plateau at lower levels.
- 1:11That doesn’t really comport with the 10,000 hours rule, does it?
- 1:15So I started to wonder about other domains that we associate
- 1:17with obligatory early specialization, like music.
- 1:21Turns out the pattern is often similar.
- 1:23The exceptional musicians didn’t start spending more time in deliberate practice
- 1:26than the average musicians until their third instrument.
- 1:29They too tended to have a sampling period.
- 1:31Even musicians we think of as famously precocious, like Yo-Yo Ma.
- 1:35So this got me interested in exploring the developmental backgrounds
- 1:38of people whose work I had long admired.
- 1:40Duke Ellington shunned music lessons as a kid
- 1:42to focus on baseball and painting and drawing.
- 1:45Mariam Mirzakhani wasn’t interested in math as a girl,
- 1:47dreamed of becoming a novelist,
- 1:49and went on to become the first and so far only woman to win the Fields Medal,
- 1:53the most prestigious prize in the world in math.
- 1:55Vincent van Gogh had five different careers before flaming out spectacularly,
- 1:59and, in his late 20s,
- 2:00picked up a book called “The Guide to the ABCs of Drawing.”
- 2:04Claude Shannon was an electrical engineer at the University of Michigan
- 2:07who took a philosophy course just to fulfill a requirement.
- 2:10And in it he learned about a near century-old system of logic
- 2:13by which true and false statements could be coded as ones and zeros
- 2:16and solved like math problems.
- 2:18This led to the development of binary code,
- 2:20which underlies all of our digital computers today.
- 2:23Frances Hesselbein took her first professional job at the age of 54,
- 2:27and went on to become the CEO of the Girl Scouts.
- 2:30Here’s an athlete I’ve followed.
- 2:32He tried some tennis, some skiing, wrestling.
- 2:34His mother was actually a tennis coach,
- 2:36but she declined to coach him because he wouldn’t return balls normally.
- 2:39And he kept trying more sports:
- 2:41handball, volleyball, soccer, badminton, skateboarding.
- 2:44So who is this dabbler?
- 2:46This is Roger Federer.
- 2:47Every bit as famous as an adult as Tiger Woods.
- 2:50And yet even tennis enthusiasts don't usually know anything
- 2:54about his developmental story.
- 2:55Why is that?
- 2:56I think it’s partly because the Tiger story is very dramatic,
- 2:59but also because it seems like this tidy narrative
- 3:02that we can extrapolate to anything that we want to be good at in our own lives.
- 3:05But it turns out that in many ways, golf is a uniquely horrible model
- 3:09of almost everything that humans want to learn.
- 3:11Golf is the epitome of what the psychologist Robin Hogarth
- 3:14called a kind learning environment.
- 3:15Next steps and goals are clear; rules that are clear and never change.
- 3:20When you do something, you get feedback that is quick and accurate.
- 3:24Chess, also a kind learning environment.
- 3:26On the other end of the spectrum are wicked learning environments
- 3:29where next steps and goals may not be clear— rules may change.
- 3:33You may or may not get feedback when you do something,
- 3:36it may be delayed, it may be inaccurate.
- 3:38Which one of these sounds like the world we're increasingly living in?
- 3:41So if hyper-specialization isn’t always the trick in a wicked world, what is?
- 3:45That can be difficult to talk about,
- 3:47because sometimes it looks like meandering or zigzagging or keeping a broader view.
- 3:51It can look like getting behind.
- 3:52But if we look at research on technological innovation,
- 3:55it shows that increasingly the most impactful patents are authored
- 3:58by teams that include individuals
- 4:01who have worked across a large number of different technology classes
- 4:04and often merge things from different domains.
- 4:06Someone whose work I've admired, who was sort of on the forefront of this,
- 4:09is a Japanese man named Junpei Yokoi.
- 4:11Yokoi didn't score well in his electronics exams at school,
- 4:14so he had to settle for a low-tier job as a machine maintenance worker
- 4:17at a playing card company in Kyoto.
- 4:19He combined some well-known technology from the calculator industry,
- 4:22with some well-known technology from the credit card industry,
- 4:25and made handheld games.
- 4:26And it turned this playing card company,
- 4:29which was founded in a wooden storefront in the 19th century,
- 4:32into a toy and game operation.
- 4:33You may have heard of it, it’s called Nintendo.
- 4:36His magnum opus was the Game Boy.
- 4:38We probably don't make as many of those people as we could,
- 4:41because we don't tend to incentivize anything that doesn't
- 4:43look like a head start or specialization.
- 4:46And naturally, I think there are as many ways to succeed as there are people,
- 4:50but I think we tend only to incentivize and encourage the Tiger path,
- 4:53when increasingly, in a wicked world, we need people
- 4:56who travel the Roger path as well.
- 4:58Or as the eminent physicist and mathematician and writer
- 5:01Freeman Dyson put it:
- 5:02“For a healthy ecosystem, we need both birds and frogs.
- 5:06Frogs are down in the mud seeing all the granular details.
- 5:09The birds are soaring up above, not seeing those details,
- 5:12but integrating the knowledge of the frogs.”
- 5:14And we need both.
- 5:15The problem, Dyson said, is that we’re telling everyone to become frogs.
- 5:20And I think in a wicked world, that's increasingly shortsighted.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The best way to become good at something might surprise you - David Epstein by TED-Ed, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,057 words across 117 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.