The AI Takeover Has Completely Backfired — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00AI was supposed to replace all software
- 0:02engineers.
- 0:03>> Nobody has to program.
- 0:04>> There are no programmers in 5 years.
- 0:06>> are going to have an AI that can
- 0:08effectively be a sort of mid-level
- 0:11engineer that you have at your company
- 0:13that can write code.
- 0:14>> We're not adding any more software
- 0:15engineers next year.
- 0:16>> That is why companies had multiple
- 0:17layoffs, right? So why then are software
- 0:20engineering job postings climbing again?
- 0:23Why is Anthropic offering its software
- 0:25engineers $750,000
- 0:28a year annually? Their CEO had predicted
- 0:30in 2025 that AI will write all code
- 0:33within a year. When it comes to AI, the
- 0:35numbers have never added up. Companies
- 0:37worldwide are projected to spend $2.7
- 0:40trillion
- 0:41on AI in 2026 alone. And how much of
- 0:44this money are companies actually making
- 0:46back? 56% of CEOs reported zero benefits
- 0:50from implementing AI in productivity and
- 0:52revenue. And the problems are piling up.
- 0:54Companies [snorts] are rehiring people
- 0:56they laid off, burning through a lot of
- 0:58revenue in terms of AI tokens, and
- 1:01facing lawsuits. So the claim that AI
- 1:03will replace all software engineers has
- 1:05officially failed. In this video, we're
- 1:07going to investigate four things: why
- 1:09companies went through the cycle of
- 1:10layoffs and rehiring, why CEOs keep
- 1:13making such extreme predictions, the big
- 1:16problem with AI-generated code, and the
- 1:18skills you need to stand out as a
- 1:19software engineer in this AI era.
- 1:22Let's jump right into it. To understand
- 1:24why companies started laying people off,
- 1:26we need to separate two timelines that
- 1:28get mashed up together. The rise of AI
- 1:30coding tools and post-pandemic tech
- 1:33correction. If we go back in time, 2018
- 1:35was the first time AI had kind of
- 1:38started coding. Microsoft introduced
- 1:40IntelliCode. It used machine learning to
- 1:42rank autocomplete suggestions based on
- 1:45the context of your code. [music] In
- 1:462019, DeepTabNine used GPT-2. This
- 1:49predicted code across multiple
- 1:51programming languages. These tools
- 1:53helped developers type and code faster.
- 1:56The first major shift came in June 2021.
- 1:59This [snorts] was when GitHub launched
- 2:01Copilot as an AI programming partner. It
- 2:05could suggest entire lines of code and
- 2:07functions, but a developer still had to
- 2:10choose the problem, view and test the
- 2:12code, and then deploy it. Then ChatGPT
- 2:14launched in November 2022. Suddenly,
- 2:17anybody could write code with plain
- 2:20[music] English. But just 5 days later,
- 2:22Stack Overflow temporarily banned
- 2:24ChatGPT-generated coding answers.
- 2:27Why? Because many answers looked very
- 2:30convincing but were completely wrong. AI
- 2:32was able to suddenly imitate the most
- 2:34important part of programming, which was
- 2:37just generating code,
- 2:39but it wasn't essentially producing the
- 2:41right code. However, this was not what
- 2:44caused most of the layoffs in that time.
- 2:46Tech companies had hired aggressively
- 2:48during the pandemic. This was because
- 2:50interest rates were low and the demand
- 2:52of online products had exploded. So when
- 2:55the interest rates rose again and growth
- 2:57slowed down, companies had to cut these
- 2:59people off that they had mass hired. In
- 3:01America, there were 233,000
- 3:04job positions cut off in 2023.
- 3:07However, AI was explicitly cited for
- 3:10only about 4,200 of them. AI was part of
- 3:14the story but definitely not the main
- 3:15cause behind this first wave of layoffs.
- 3:18Then in March 2024, Cognition introduced
- 3:21Devin, the first AI software engineer.
- 3:24Devin successfully resolved only 13% of
- 3:27coding issues, which was impressive but
- 3:29nowhere near replacing a real software
- 3:32engineer. But executives saw this and
- 3:35immediately made this assumption that
- 3:38because software engineers could write
- 3:40code fast because of AI, we would need
- 3:43lesser software engineers and lesser
- 3:45investment. But all that AI had
- 3:47automated was code generation, which is
- 3:49not the only role of a software
- 3:51engineer. AI had not automated system
- 3:53architecture, security, debugging,
- 3:56production, ownership, and
- 3:57responsibility when something breaks. So
- 4:00So was never AI replace software
- 4:01engineers. The cycle was companies over
- 4:04hired, then they cut costs, so they had
- 4:06to cut people. They assumed AI would
- 4:08close the gap, but they started rehiring
- 4:11when unautomated work started piling up.
- 4:13And that brings us to the next question.
- 4:15If the evidence was never that clear,
- 4:17why did so many CEOs make such extreme
- 4:20predictions? Well, you got to understand
- 4:22that for a CEO, you are not the target
- 4:24audience. Building AI is extremely
- 4:27expensive. As mentioned earlier, there's
- 4:292.7 trillion dollars invested into AI
- 4:32this year. Most of that money came from
- 4:34investors, and that amount is so much
- 4:37greater than the profit made by any of
- 4:40these companies. So the investors expect
- 4:42an explanation on how they'll get a
- 4:45return on that money they spent. So when
- 4:48a CEO says AI will write the code,
- 4:50investors hear lower labor costs, high
- 4:54profit margin, and the ability to
- 4:56produce more code without hiring more
- 4:58people. This prediction became a
- 5:00financial story. This story being yes,
- 5:03AI is expensive today, but tomorrow
- 5:05it'll dramatically reduce costs. But if
- 5:08you listen carefully to the language
- 5:09used by these CEOs, they keep [music]
- 5:11saying AI will replace writing code.
- 5:14They never explicitly really mention
- 5:16that AI will replace all software
- 5:17engineers. Because that's not the same
- 5:19thing. Writing code, again, is not the
- 5:21only thing that a software engineer
- 5:22does. Even if AI comes in and writes 90%
- 5:25of the code, somebody has to come in and
- 5:27decide what to build. They need to
- 5:29design the system, understand business
- 5:31requirements, review the generated code,
- 5:34test it, make sure it's secure, and then
- 5:35ship it. And this is not the first time
- 5:38programming has gone through a major
- 5:39shift like this.
- 5:40>> [music]
- 5:40>> In 1940s, programmers worked directly
- 5:43with machine instructions. In 1947,
- 5:46Kathleen Booth began developing one of
- 5:48the first assembly languages. In 1957,
- 5:51IBM released Fortran. This was the first
- 5:53high-level programming language. So
- 5:55throughout the years, software engineers
- 5:56have moved to a higher level of
- 5:58abstraction. AI assisted coding is just
- 6:00the next step in that progression. But
- 6:02here's the actual problem with AI
- 6:04generated code. First is bloating. AI
- 6:06tends to add a lot of unnecessary
- 6:08functions and methods, even when a few
- 6:11lines of code could solve the problem.
- 6:12For example, here's a simple function
- 6:15that I wrote. It converts a name to a
- 6:17username. Here is the same function
- 6:19generated by AI. Both produce the same
- 6:21result, but the AI code is so bloated
- 6:24and unnecessarily complicated. This also
- 6:26creates technical debt. Teams start
- 6:29become responsible for all of this code
- 6:31that nobody really understands. Second
- 6:33is duplication. Instead of finding and
- 6:35reusing a function that already exists
- 6:37in the code base, AI may simply create
- 6:39another version of it. Third is costs.
- 6:41Without token limits or guardrails, if
- 6:43you're not careful, an AI agent can
- 6:46easily just re-comb the entire
- 6:48repository for a simple change. This can
- 6:50dramatically increase costs. And the
- 6:52last point is subtle bugs. AI can
- 6:55introduce mistakes that might seem
- 6:56common sense to human beings, but
- 6:59>> [music]
- 6:59>> they're not easy to catch in tests. For
- 7:01example, [snorts] they might just handle
- 7:03time in local time instead of UTC. So,
- 7:06the bugs would look harmless in
- 7:08isolation, or you might not even catch
- 7:10them, but they can lead to big problems
- 7:12in production. So, now that you know
- 7:13that AI is not replacing developers,
- 7:16what skills should you focus on to stand
- 7:18out in this AI job market? First, learn
- 7:21system design. It is no longer something
- 7:23only senior engineers are expected to
- 7:24understand. Juniors and even interns
- 7:27should now know the fundamentals. If
- 7:29you're unsure where to begin, I have a
- 7:30video here for you to get started. It
- 7:33covers all the basics of system design.
- 7:35Second, become extremely good at reading
- 7:38and debugging code. You should use AI to
- 7:40generate code, but if somebody asks you
- 7:42how the code works, you should be able
- 7:44to explain it line by line. You should
- 7:46be able to justify why all of it exists
- 7:50and why you made all the decisions that
- 7:52you did. Third, learn how to manage AI
- 7:54tools properly. Give agents only the
- 7:56context they need. Set token and
- 7:58iteration limits. Restrict their
- 7:59permissions and require manual approval
- 8:01before it performs any sensitive tasks.
- 8:04Finally, build projects that are
- 8:05actually useful in the real world.
- 8:08Nobody needs another to-do list app. If
- 8:10you need ideas, I have another video for
- 8:12you on five AI projects that you should
- 8:14pursue to get hired. Whatever you build
- 8:17should solve a real problem. It should
- 8:19save somebody time, reduce a business
- 8:21expense, or have the potential to earn
- 8:23revenue. Because anybody can generate
- 8:25lines of code now, it's all about
- 8:27execution. I hope you found this video
- 8:29helpful. Please give it a thumbs up and
- 8:31subscribe for more.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of The AI Takeover Has Completely Backfired by Anjali Viramgama, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,459 words across 231 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.