YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → Strzelanina w Krakowie i Teorie Konspiracyjne! Dlaczego Sąsiedzi Nic Nie Słyszeli? - Analiza Ator

Strzelanina w Krakowie i Teorie Konspiracyjne! Dlaczego Sąsiedzi Nic Nie Słyszeli? - Analiza Ator — Transcript

by wideoprezentacje · 11,052 words · 2,053 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
0:03I bow in the green glow.
0:13When something happens that shocks
0:14public opinion, and the official version
0:16of events presented by the government is
0:19completely unbelievable, conspiracy
0:20theories emerge, and it's 100 percent
0:22the government's fault, because it is
0:24unwilling, unable, or—worse still—
0:26unable (because someone is preventing it
0:28) to present a credible version of
0:30events to the public.
0:43This happened, for example, in 2023 with
0:45the mysterious passing of Mr. Grzegorz
0:48Borys, a soldier who likely saw too much
0:50.
0:56And immediately afterward, something
0:58happened that, according to public
0:59opinion, doesn't quite add up.
1:08Mr. Grzegorz Borys allegedly took the
1:10lives of his young son and his dog, then
1:12fled his home and spent many days and
1:14nights hiding from pursuers, leading
1:16them by the nose and out into the open.
1:28He wandered far from home, only to
1:30return a few days later, very close to
1:32his home, and take his own life.
1:42And these kinds of situations, when
1:44someone takes the life of their family
1:46and, crucially, almost always their pets
1:48, and then does very strange things,
1:50people search for them, there's a
1:52manhunt, and in the end, they never
1:54survive, which is very important.
2:01Sometimes as a result of
2:03self-destruction, sometimes as a result
2:05of
2:07being stopped by the authorities.
2:12We've had quite a few of these
2:14situations over the past few years, and
2:15each time, there's been some mystery
2:17surrounding them.
2:29It's no wonder that in the case of the
2:31shooting in Krakow or the attack in
2:33Krakow, when the official version of
2:35events doesn't quite add up, and the
2:37authorities and, above all, politicians
2:39clearly manipulate the facts to suit
2:41their thesis, trying to force the
2:43attacker to be a right-winger, despite
2:45the clear evidence that he was, in fact
2:47, a leftist, numerous conspiracy
2:48theories emerge.
2:59Because, ladies and gentlemen, the story
3:01politicians tell us roughly boils down
3:04to this: There's a disturbed boy.
3:09So disturbed that absolutely no one
3:11notices.
3:16His family doesn't see it, his friends
3:18don't see it, his loved ones don't see
3:20it, the psychologists and psychiatrists
3:22who qualified him for firearms and
3:24offensive military tactics training
3:26courses don't see it.
3:36All signs point to him holding very
3:38left-wing views.
3:41He liked to pose with the LGBT flag, he
3:43liked to marry the Pope.
3:48Clearly, his social media posts
3:50suggested he identified with the left,
3:52even with communism.
3:56And
4:05this man lived in...And suddenly, he
4:07decided to travel many kilometers to his
4:09hometown just to take the lives of his
4:11father, his mother, and his sister, whom
4:14, importantly, he loved very much.
4:23Shortly before this incident, he had
4:25been in contact with his loved ones,
4:26including his grandmother, and
4:28everything indicated that they were one
4:30big, loving family.
4:32There was no motive on his part to take
4:34the lives of his loved ones.
4:39Interestingly, he also took the lives of
4:41two cats, so, as is typical in these
4:43types of stories, the topic of taking
4:45the lives of pets appears.
4:49Because no, he traveled all those miles
4:52.
4:54Some would say it was to take the gun
4:56with him.
4:57No, no.
5:00It turns out the AR-15 he was shooting
5:02with was his, registered to him, and
5:04legally stored in his apartment in
5:06Krakow.
5:11He went to his family's apartment only
5:13to execute his loved ones while they
5:14slept.
5:18And he did it without anyone hearing.
5:29Then he headed
5:41back to Krakow to commit a disgusting
5:43attack on the lives of bystanders, be
5:45neutralized by two heroic police
5:47officers, be put on an operating table,
5:49and pass away.
5:58Thanks to that, the services, the
5:59prosecutor's office, and the police
6:04had a reason to dismiss the
6:05investigation without investigating
6:07something very important.
6:10What the hell kind of motive did this
6:11man have?
6:14Because the motive to commit the attack
6:16is one thing.
6:19But the motive to take the life of his
6:21sister, whom he loved very much, is
6:23another.
6:25The motive to take the life of his
6:27father, with whom he was very close;
6:29they used to go to the same shooting
6:31club together is another.
6:34Taking the life of his mother, to whom
6:36he was incredibly attached, is fourth.
6:40And doing it to cats is fifth.
6:44And this motive would have to be
6:45investigated if the perpetrator had
6:47survived, but since he didn't,
6:54it won't be determined because it
6:55doesn't have to be.
6:57The case will soon be dismissed, as in
6:59every other case of this type, including
7:01the death of Grzegorz Borys.
7:05We won't know the truth.
7:09Not only because someone won't want us
7:11to know, but simply because no one will
7:13be forced to officially establish it,
7:15and the case doesn't quite make sense.
7:19Two examples.
7:21Example number one: the silencer.
7:25As soon as we were told there
7:31was a hypothesis that the perpetrator
7:33had taken what was most precious to his
7:35family and two cats, the question arose
7:37: how on earth had no one heard that?
7:46An additional question arose, however,
7:48why on the recording of the police
7:50entering the apartment, the police could
7:52clearly be heard saying to someone, "
7:54Show your hands," at least twice, even
7:56when no one else was alive.
8:01So who was supposed to reveal the lives
8:03of these ghosts?
8:05Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I'd say it's
8:07very strange and unusual.
8:33>> Police!
8:42Please come out!
8:48Police!
8:50Please come out!
8:53Please come out!
10:11What's even more
10:13>> interesting is the issue of that
10:14silencer.
10:20People started asking questions on
10:21Saturday about how the hell no one heard
10:23anything.
10:27Questions about the silencer began, and
10:29the information was that there was no
10:31silencer.
10:35As late as Monday, information from
10:36official sources appeared at the press
10:38conference of the prosecutor in charge
10:40of the case that the silencer had not
10:42been found anywhere.
10:49So, at this point, not only conspiracy
10:51theorists but also people on the surface
10:53of the internet, who don't shy away from
10:55any such theories, started asking a very
10:57important question.
11:01Damn, how is that possible?
11:04Three people, two bullets per person, is
11:07six people, two cats.
11:11It's much harder to hit a cat than a
11:13human, so in practice, a dozen bullets
11:15must have hit various objects in a small
11:17room, including the walls.
11:21Among other things, the bang must have
11:23been incredible.
11:25And what, no one heard it? That's
11:26impossible. And on Monday, the
11:28prosecutor said at a press conference
11:30that there definitely wasn't a silencer
11:32, so people are saying, "That's bloody
11:34impossible." And you know what's
11:35happening, ladies and gentlemen?
11:38On Tuesday, the Attorney General said
11:40the silencer was found.
11:43Don't believe it?
11:47Ladies and gentlemen, Wirtualna Polska,
11:49an article from today, November 10th, by
11:51Paulina Ciesielska, who accessed the
11:53attacker's computer.
11:57Żurek revealed who he was reading about
11:59.
11:59Investigators found a silencer in the
12:01car of the perpetrator of the Krakow
12:03attack.
12:05We'll address the second part of that
12:07article in a moment.
12:09First, that silencer.
12:17>> Where are you hiding, ladies and
12:18gentlemen?
12:20This is a story straight out of a
12:22bedtime story, and it's not for the
12:24faint of heart.
12:27It's Saturday, there's no silencer.
12:29It's Sunday, there's no silencer.
12:33It's Monday, after the perpetrator's car
12:35has been thoroughly searched multiple
12:37times.
12:39There's no muffler, and a muffler,
12:41ladies and gentlemen, for an Aer 15,
12:44isn't that small a thing, it's a huge
12:46beast.
12:49You can't hide that, ladies and
12:50gentlemen, in the tissue box.
12:54It's a big deal, right?
12:56So, ladies and gentlemen, the police
12:58search the car on Saturday.
13:01There's no muffler. There's no muffler
13:03on Sunday.
13:05On Monday, there's official information
13:07that the search has been completed.
13:10There's no muffler. The prosecutor says
13:13this, and a very serious public concern
13:15arises. So how on earth, if there was no
13:17muffler anywhere, did no one hear
13:19anything?
13:21Suddenly, a muffler was found in a car
13:23that had been searched for three days,
13:25and the searches were concluded without
13:27finding the muffler.
13:31Interestingly, there's no information
13:33that the search of the muffler, the
13:35search of the car, concluded on Monday,
13:37was then resumed on Tuesday.
13:41Because how they found the muffler, I
13:43don't know, but without resuming the
13:45search, and they found it when it was
13:47needed, ladies and gentlemen.
13:50Well, ladies and gentlemen, it's
13:52probably no wonder that conspiracy
13:54theories are emerging in this context.
14:04Another, even more interesting, issue is
14:06Minister Kierwiński, who, even before
14:08the official briefing with the Prime
14:10Minister, decided to play politics with
14:12the corpses of both the perpetrator's
14:14family and those murdered in Krakow and
14:16incite the so-called right, saying that
14:18, as he put it, everything points to
14:19this man being interested in far-right
14:21ideology, that he was influenced by this
14:24far-right ideology.
14:33On Saturday, the Minister was unable or
14:35unwilling to say what evidence there was
14:37to support this.
14:39Probably because there was simply
14:41nothing of the sort.
14:44But the Minister kept insisting that
14:46this man was definitely a right-winger,
14:48despite the fact that, ladies and
14:50gentlemen, all possible circumstantial
14:52evidence pointed to the opposite.
14:56An analysis of his social media profiles
14:58indicated he was a leftist.
15:02He mocked the Pope and posed with an
15:04LGBT flag.
15:08His statements indicated he identified
15:10more with communism than with capitalism
15:12.
15:15But Mr. Kierwiński claimed he was a
15:17right-winger.
15:21So, the media favoring Mr. Kierwiński
15:23started saying he came from a right-wing
15:25family.
15:33But damn, this right-wing family turned
15:34out to be quite left-wing, as evidenced
15:36by an analysis of the works at the
15:38opening of the exhibition of the alleged
15:40perpetrator's beloved sister.
15:49In which, so to speak, even a layman
15:51would find rather left-wing overtones,
15:54such as the LGBT flag.
15:56And I talked about this in our
15:58commentary series. Nevertheless, Mr.
16:00Kierwiński keeps rambling, rambling,
16:02rambling.
16:06And he's increasingly coming across as,
16:08let's say, not very credible.
16:13Because they were already trying to use
16:15the flag with their last remaining
16:16strength.
16:18In the
16:23perpetrator's apartment, a very specific
16:26flag was found.
16:28Here I reached for my notes.
16:31The Gadsden flag, and they tried to
16:33convince us that this was a flag
16:35associated with the right.
16:39Except it's not linked to the right, but
16:41rather generally to rebellion.
16:45Currently, it's mainly linked to the
16:47rebellion of the LGBT community, as I
16:49demonstrated in today's short from 5:00
16:52a.m., showing numerous photos of various
16:54LGBT organizations
17:01painting this flag on top of the rainbow
17:03flag.
17:05So, ladies and gentlemen, I'd say it's a
17:08complete mess.
17:10A complete mess.
17:11The minister is inciting the
17:13right-wingers despite having absolutely
17:15no basis for it.
17:22And even though someone pointed out this
17:24guy's social media a dozen or so minutes
17:26after counterterrorists entered his
17:28apartment, those who shouted at the
17:29corpses to show their hands—well, well,
17:31some people still managed to take
17:33screenshots.
17:41He was probably a gematrist, a Talmudist
17:44, a person interested in occult
17:45knowledge, the occult, an extreme
17:47leftist.
17:50Well, that's what the screenshots
17:52circulating online suggest.
17:56Nothing on the internet suggests any
17:57connection to the right.
18:02But ladies and gentlemen, we succeeded.
18:06We finally managed to connect this man
18:08to the right, only in a way that an
18:10intelligent person, well, well, you
18:12probably wouldn't believe.
18:20And here, ladies and gentlemen, the next
18:22part, ladies and gentlemen, the next
18:24part, sort of like the text I've already
18:26referenced.
18:29Mr. Żurek, Wirtualna Polska, I mean
18:31Wirtualna Polska about Mr. Żurek, right
18:34?
18:35Ms. Paulina Ciesielska, the title of the
18:37article: They got into the attacker's
18:39computer.
18:40Żurek reveals who he was reading about.
18:43Investigators found a muffler in the car
18:45of the perpetrator of the Krakow attack
18:47.
18:50Let me remind you, ladies and gentlemen
18:52, they finished searching the car on
18:53Monday, and on Monday there was a report
18:55that no muffler was found.
19:06But then on Tuesday, as a result of the
19:08search of the same car, which had
19:10already been completed, it was found.
19:16Because if it hadn't been found, it
19:18would have been a terrible narrative
19:19problem, so why didn't anyone hear
19:21anything, right?
19:27But here, despite the previously
19:29completed searches of the car, which
19:30revealed the absence of a muffler, when
19:32they needed to find one in the car, they
19:34found it despite the previously
19:36completed searches.
19:39But here, the story about the muffler
19:41already existed.
19:44Now, ladies and gentlemen, on to him.
19:51Investigators found a muffler in the car
19:53of the perpetrator of the Krakow attack
19:55, and a history of visits to websites
19:56devoted to Anders Breivik was secured on
19:58his computer.
20:03Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek
20:04confirmed in an interview with Radio
20:06Kraków that the prosecutor's office is
20:08investigating the issue of right-wing
20:10extremism. Well, ladies and gentlemen,
20:12how damn convenient.
20:15It's true that on the surface of the
20:16internet, the boy didn't reveal his
20:18right-wing views in any way.
20:22On the surface of the internet, the
20:24young boy obviously emanated far-left
20:26and left-leaning views.
20:32But he was also from a left-leaning
20:34family, but deep down, he was right-wing
20:36.
20:39And we have to believe the government,
20:41which has lied many times, because they
20:43won't show the evidence.
20:46We have to believe the people who lied
20:48so many times. Yes, yes, yes, ladies and
20:51gentlemen. Things really need a good
20:53poop here, you know. It's the same as me
20:55, right?
20:56On the surface, heterosexuality oozes
20:58everywhere, but in reality, if they
21:00searched my computers, they'd probably
21:02find I have a thing for hamsters and
21:04four-leaf clovers.
21:10Well, they can say anything, since they
21:12deleted my social media pages, and also
21:14, and again, be warned: no one knows who
21:16deleted them, no one knows who, and only
21:19they, ladies and gentlemen, have the
21:21computer.
21:25Okay, let's read this article and then
21:27we'll move on to discussing conspiracy
21:28theories. Yes, ladies and gentlemen,
21:30because this is just the introduction.
21:33This is just the introduction, this is
21:35just a prelude to why these conspiracy
21:37theories have emerged.
21:40We're about to read four conspiracy
21:41theories from four different places on
21:43the internet.
21:47The crew after the Krakow attack,
21:48investigating the latest information.
21:50Waldemar Żurek revealed details of the
21:52investigation conducted after the Krakow
21:54attack on Radio Krakow. Authorities
21:56gained access to the attacker's computer
21:58,
22:01which reported activity on websites
22:03devoted to Andreas Breivik, the
22:05Norwegian terrorist responsible for the
22:07massacres on the island of Utøya.
22:10A silencer and nearly 500 rounds of
22:12ammunition were also seized.
22:16Among the evidence, a Godzden flag, a
22:18symbol associated with the far-right
22:20movement in the United States, was also
22:22found in his room, writes Wirtualna
22:24Polska.
22:28"So, ladies and gentlemen, I invite you
22:30to visit my YouTube channel's homepage
22:32for a video presentation.
22:38Go to the Shorts tab there, and you'll
22:40find a Short posted today, November 10,
22:432026, at 5:00 a.m., showing screenshots
22:45of how the Godzden flag has become a de
22:47facto symbol of the LGBT movement and
22:49the rebellion of the LGBT community,
22:51against which they refer to the dominant
22:54heterosexual majority.
22:59Oh, gosh.
23:00I'll take screenshots of this page,
23:02because ladies and gentlemen, it'll
23:04disappear in a moment.
23:07A
23:11significant new finding is the finding
23:13of a silencer in the perpetrator's car.
23:15How did it end up there on Tuesday?" How
23:18on earth was it not found by Monday? I
23:21don't know. Did he teleport there, or
23:22maybe someone brought it? I don't know.
23:25I'd ask Mr. Żurek, but he probably won't
23:28answer.
23:30Żurek pointed out that this fact,
23:32combined with the dozen or so magazines
23:34and nearly 500 rounds of ammunition,
23:36indicates a planned attack.
23:39How so? That he fired without a silencer
23:41?
23:42Well, he fired without a silencer.
23:44That's clearly audible on the recordings
23:46. This is unsuppressed fire. Behind it,
23:49you can see his rifle.
23:51After all, there are photos of his AR-
23:5315 rifle. Or, excuse me, a rifle.
23:56There's no silencer. Who planted that
23:58silencer, if I may ask, and when?
24:01I'm betting that after people started
24:03saying so forcefully, "Hey, but without
24:05a silencer," he couldn't have killed his
24:07family without anyone hearing.
24:09The prosecutor's office is also
24:11investigating the type of ammunition
24:12used in the attack.
24:15They're analyzing whether it was
24:17military-grade ammunition or
24:19semi-jacketed ammunition, which causes
24:20more extensive external injuries.
24:24Interestingly, they're not analyzing who
24:26sold him the ammunition.
24:30As I checked, you can't just walk into a
24:32store and buy that much ammunition,
24:34right?
24:38But I've talked about all of this in our
24:39commentary series, including why no one
24:41asks who the hell trained him.
24:44Preliminary autopsy results from the
24:46victims indicate very serious damage to
24:48internal organs.
24:51The minister admitted that the
24:53perpetrator left no letter or message.
24:57This, ladies and gentlemen, is worth
24:59remembering, because that could change
25:01soon, because people will start asking,
25:03hey, but all these attackers left a
25:05motto, a message, a suicide note, right
25:07?
25:09And why didn't he? So he'll probably be
25:11found soon. Maybe there was no silencer
25:13in the car they searched, and suddenly a
25:15silencer appeared. Well, if the path has
25:17been cleared, a suicide note and a
25:19manifesto could appear soon.
25:22And his death in the hospital makes it
25:24difficult to fully determine his motives
25:26.
25:28Żurek noted, however, that the evidence
25:30collected in the first few days of the
25:31proceedings supports the thesis of
25:33right-wing extremism.
25:35Hmm.
25:37But how?
25:39Which was first publicly presented by
25:41Minister of Internal Affairs Marcin
25:43Kierwiński. Look at the complete
25:45reversal.
25:47From Kierwa liar to Kierwa hero.
25:49He was the first to say it.
25:54If we connect the dots and we have this
25:56flag, which some people associate with a
25:58rock band's album.
26:02Not all of us have such a flag at home,
26:05possess so many weapons, and
26:06simultaneously watch Breivik's exploits
26:08on our computers, said on Radio Żurek.
26:14Paulina Ciesielska: "Ladies and
26:15gentlemen, I'll take it all and screen
26:17it all, because it literally, ladies and
26:19gentlemen, doesn't make sense, and it
26:21doesn't hold up very, very well.
26:26So, ladies and gentlemen, wherever it
26:28appears, wherever the official version
26:30clearly doesn't make sense, there are
26:32conspiracy theories.
26:36And conspiracy theories,
26:42conspiracy theories, ladies and
26:44gentlemen, I emphasize that this is not
26:46true, these are just conspiracy theories
26:48.
26:49Sometimes they are confirmed, sometimes
26:52they are not."
26:56And I remind you that we are in Green
26:58Glow, where we discuss various
26:59conspiracy theories for purely
27:01entertainment purposes, right?
27:05This is quite important, ladies and
27:07gentlemen.
27:11This is quite important.
27:14So what, ladies and gentlemen?
27:17Now we will discuss these four
27:18conspiracy theories and discuss them
27:23quite seriously, we will discuss them
27:25quite thoroughly.
27:34But before we begin, ladies and
27:36gentlemen, let's recall what is most
27:38important in this series.
27:42Ladies and gentlemen, Green Glow is an
27:44entertainment series in which, for
27:46purely entertainment purposes, we summon
27:48various conspiracy theories from the
27:50depths of the internet, in order to
27:51subject them to logical analysis for
27:53purely entertainment purposes.
27:59Just because I cite a conspiracy theory
28:01does not mean that I believe in it, nor
28:03does it mean that I disseminate, promote
28:05, or lend credence to it.
28:07I'm simply presenting it exactly as it
28:09appears in the sources, for the sake of
28:11purely entertainment purposes, to
28:13subject it to logical analysis.
28:21I'm very clear that just because
28:23something is logical doesn't mean it's
28:25automatically true, and it also works
28:26the other way around: just because
28:28something is completely illogical
28:30doesn't mean it's automatically untrue,
28:32but just because something is completely
28:33pointless doesn't mean our politicians
28:35won't do it.
28:48Today's post is part of the "not Sunday
28:50" rule, which states that if the Sunday
28:52post gets 5,000 likes by midnight on
28:54Tuesday, you'll receive a second
28:55additional post from that same series.
29:02And as I'm watching, just as I'm
29:04starting to record this post, the Sunday
29:06post
29:10has
29:1313,000 likes, so there are still a few
29:15hours left until midnight.
29:19You have a real chance of reaching
29:2115,000, and then the second conspiracy
29:23theory would be on Thursday, so I'll add
29:25a link to this theory from Sunday,
29:27titled "One of Them Reveals the Hidden
29:28Truth About the Krakow Shooting."
29:34It's worth watching if anyone hasn't.
29:36Very powerful material, very powerful.
29:42And it's worth giving it a thumbs up, if
29:44only to keep it going, but also to get
29:4615,000 likes and get the second green
29:48light this week on Thursday.
29:53I sincerely thank everyone who will put
29:55up with the fact that ads will be
29:56displayed on this material.
29:58This stems from a very simple fact:
30:04Every creator wants their content to go
30:06viral, but every creator also wants to
30:08be able to create as much as possible.
30:11And to be able to create as much as
30:13possible, you need to have money for it
30:15.
30:16Unfortunately, YouTube's theories that
30:18say YouTube pays for views, comments, or
30:20shares are untrue.
30:23These are very important for the content
30:25to go viral, which is very important,
30:27but YouTube pays for ads.
30:29And these are the ones that the viewer
30:31will watch from beginning to end, or, to
30:33put it briefly, skip ahead.
30:37So, ladies and gentlemen?
30:41Uh-huh.
30:45Uh-huh.
30:48Uh-huh.
30:57We're going, we're going, ladies and
30:59gentlemen, with a discussion of theories
31:01.
31:04The first theory we'll be discussing
31:06today has been made public online in
31:08many places, including, ladies and
31:10gentlemen, by Mr. Grzegorz GPS Świderski
31:12.
31:17We'll read this theory.
31:19I emphasize, I didn't invent these
31:20theories; I've merely compiled four
31:22theories, which we'll read for purely
31:24entertainment purposes.
31:28A conspiracy hypothesis.
31:31The security services murdered the
31:33attacker's family and then blackmailed
31:35him into committing the massacre in
31:37Krakow.
31:46If, the day after the massacre, the
31:48media and the state already have a
31:49ready-made narrative that Michał
31:51Oksiński murdered his family, then we
31:53should start by challenging it, because
31:55if this murder was more sophisticated,
31:57it must have been aided by a
31:58disinformation campaign.
32:13This is a hypothesis that can be
32:15subjected to forensic analysis.
32:20It's not impossible, given the facts
32:22we've learned so far.
32:28The services cultivate many such
32:30attackers to use at the right moment.
32:37Oksiński was chosen for this task
32:38because they were able to incite
32:44him.
32:47They murder his family to show them
32:48they're not to be trifled with, and then
32:50threaten to kill him too.
32:57But if he commits the massacre and
32:59escapes safely, they'll help him hide,
33:01because they'll bring him somewhere in
33:02Guatemala and provide him with
33:04conditions for a peaceful life in hiding
33:06.
33:12That's why the attacker dons protective
33:14equipment to increase his chances of
33:16survival and escape.
33:18The bodies of his father, mother, and
33:20sister were found in the perpetrator's
33:22home.
33:24All had gunshot wounds.
33:28None of the neighbors heard the shots or
33:29the commotion.
33:33All of this happened quietly.
33:36Professional services can do this
33:38without revealing anything.
33:41That, ladies and gentlemen, is perhaps
33:43the most important thing in all of this
33:45.
33:49Because above all, God bless the souls
33:51of all those who died.
33:54I pray for all who died, including for
33:56the perpetrator's forgiveness.
34:01And I pray for those who are now
34:02fighting for their health.
34:04But ladies and gentlemen, let me be
34:06blunt.
34:07I have no experience with firearms. I am
34:10, so to speak, a pacifist.
34:13However, I have many friends who have a
34:15lot of experience with firearms. For
34:17example, I know many police officers and
34:19soldiers.
34:21And also people who do, let's call it,
34:23police work.
34:31Everyone says there's no damn physical
34:33possibility of shooting a father, mother
34:35, sister, and two cats without everyone
34:37moving if one person does it, without
34:44anyone moving.
34:46And according to the official version of
34:48events, the
34:54perpetrator, meaning the victims, the
34:56victims in the perpetrator's home were
34:58shot in their pajamas, in their sleeping
35:00clothes—as the prosecutor so politely
35:02put it, in their beds.
35:06Well, ladies and gentlemen, it was an
35:08apartment with several rooms.
35:10They didn't all live in one room, they
35:12didn't all sleep in one bed. Parents are
35:15one thing, sister is another.
35:19Regardless of who started this mad raid
35:21, the
35:26other would wake up in the other room,
35:28right?
35:31If he started with his sister, the
35:33father and mother would have to wake up
35:34.
35:35If he started with his father and mother
35:36, the sister would have to wake up.
35:40Meanwhile, they were all exhausted in
35:42their sleep.
35:44Have you ever tried to catch a cat?
35:47How can you avoid getting caught?
35:51If he started with the cats, the whole
35:53family would definitely be aroused.
35:57Right?
35:58If he started with the cats, the family
36:00would definitely be aroused.
36:03And if he started with the family, the
36:05cats would see what was happening and
36:06would definitely start running away.
36:08Well, ladies and gentlemen, catching a
36:10cat is difficult, and catching it by
36:12chance in a small room, man.
36:16That's impossible for one person.
36:19However, a situation where the police
36:21quietly enter at night
36:25, oh well, that's already plausible.
36:28And now this isn't the only conspiracy
36:30theory hypothesis of this kind appearing
36:32online.
36:35The second version is that, because in
36:37this version, Mr. Grzegorz is spinning a
36:39theory that originated on the darknet,
36:41let's not delve into it.
36:45That the services rejected and
36:47exterminated those two loved ones, those
36:49three loved ones, and the two cats.
36:54And then they told the perpetrator that
36:55if you commit a massacre, we'll let you
36:57live.
37:00Frankly, this version is not very
37:02credible.
37:13Remember, Michał loved his father, he
37:15was close to him, they trained together
37:17.
37:19He loved his mother, he was close to her
37:21.
37:22He loved his sister very much, he was
37:24close to her.
37:28This also suggests that he probably
37:29didn't kill them himself, but it
37:31suggests that this conspiracy theory
37:33simply doesn't hold water.
37:36Why?
37:37Imagine this.
37:39You're a young man, twenty-four years
37:41old, give or take.
37:46Several masked secret service men
37:47entered your apartment.
37:52They wreaked havoc on you, exterminated
37:54your parents, sister, cats, and then
37:56they tell you to commit a massacre in
37:58the Krakow market square, and you'll
38:00live.
38:02And what?
38:04And you say yes, yes, yes, my will to
38:06live is so strong that I'll do what you
38:08, who murdered my family, want me to,
38:10right?
38:12Hell, probably not.
38:15Hell, probably not.
38:20It would have ended with him attacking
38:22them and getting shot too.
38:26There's a second, more likely version.
38:31Namely, that they entered his house,
38:33turned the guns on
38:40him and his family.
38:44They told them not to move, and he told
38:46them to go and do what he ultimately did
38:48.
38:52Go and do it.
38:55If you do it the way we want, they will
38:57live.
39:01They will live.
39:07And I don't believe that anyone, after
39:08they killed three loving family members
39:10and two animals,
39:21would want to follow these people's
39:22orders, then I don't believe it.
39:30However, the fact that someone was
39:31blackmailed into believing that if they
39:33did this, they would let them live—
39:35that's the reality, that's already
39:36happening, it's very likely that this
39:38could indeed be the case, that they
39:40forced him to act with this blackmail.
39:49Also note that every political
39:54murderer, so to speak, leaves a
39:56manifesto. He didn't leave one.
40:03In my opinion, Mr. Żurek's statement,
40:05which Lavirualna Polska quoted, is an
40:07oversight indicating a lack of
40:09professionalism in the propaganda
40:10message.
40:13I think I'll find out soon, I think
40:15they'll find this manifesto soon.
40:19I think they will find it soon.
40:24And certainly, since they've already
40:26found a muffler in a car that was
40:28searched earlier, and the muffler wasn't
40:30there before, and suddenly it appeared,
40:32I think they'll go in the same direction
40:33and find this manifesto in the same car
40:35, well, maybe somewhere on the internet
40:37.
40:40Perhaps somewhere on the internet, but
40:41that's rather unlikely.
40:47So, dear friends, please note that yes,
40:49he didn't leave a suicide note, so he
40:51wasn't suicidal.
40:53He didn't leave a manifesto, so he
40:55wasn't acting for political reasons.
40:58So why the hell did he do it?
41:00There's no motive.
41:01No manifesto, no political motives.
41:05No suicide note, no desire to log out of
41:07life.
41:09Besides, ladies and gentlemen, if he
41:11were so disturbed that he wanted to log
41:13out of life, I'm now putting myself at
41:15great risk. God forbid, they'll try to
41:17do something to me for this,
41:20but please note that he clearly wanted
41:21to live.
41:25In the video of his neutralization, we
41:27clearly see that as he lies on the
41:29ground, already subdued, he raises his
41:31hands, right?
41:34He surrendered, ladies and gentlemen.
41:36And to be clear, I'm not saying, God
41:38forbid, that the policeman who
41:39neutralized him did anything wrong. I
41:41was the first in Poland to say that the
41:43policeman who neutralized him should
41:45receive a medal.
41:47One policeman was already lying on the
41:49ground, unconscious. The second one knew
41:51he was about to lose consciousness.
41:54Completely disabling him was a
42:00rational action, if only to prevent the
42:02man from starting to murder again.
42:06It was a rational action.
42:09I emphasize, rational.
42:12It stemmed from the fact that one
42:14officer was already unconscious, while
42:16the other knew he was about to lose
42:17consciousness.
42:21And how were they supposed to know,
42:23those officers, that the perpetrator
42:24wouldn't get up and start murdering
42:26again?
42:29So I was the first to say that
42:35those officers deserve a medal.
42:37Just like everyone else, they said, wow
42:40, execution, you'll see, they'll get
42:42some kind of sentence.
42:44However, ladies and gentlemen, I'm
42:46telling you straight, he deserves
42:53it, ladies and gentlemen, he tried to
42:55surrender.
43:11So, ladies and gentlemen, how many
43:12suicides do you know who try to
43:14surrender?
43:17Because there is such a thing as a
43:18police officer taking away your most
43:20precious possession.
43:22It's quite common in the United States
43:24and even has a name.
43:25I won't name it, so as not to call it an
43:27algorithm, right?
43:30But there is such a thing—there's even a
43:32name for it, right?
43:34So, first of all, where's the suicide
43:36note? And secondly, if he surrendered,
43:38he wanted to live.
43:42If he'd murdered his own family first,
43:43he wouldn't have wanted to live.
43:48If someone had murdered his family, he
43:53wouldn't have wanted to live, but he
43:54wanted to live.
43:56So it's much more likely,
44:03much more likely, that he thought he'd
44:05have someone to come home to, that he
44:07might get a life sentence or something.
44:11Let me remind you that in our country,
44:13even a life sentence doesn't mean life
44:15imprisonment, because you can apply for
44:17parole.
44:24And he'll have someone to live for,
44:25because these people will survive.
44:28That's apropos, ladies and gentlemen, to
44:30the version presented by this gentleman
44:32.
44:38The bodies of his father, mother, and
44:40sister were found in the perpetrator's
44:42home. They all suffered gunshot wounds.
44:45None of the neighbors heard the shots or
44:47the argument.
44:48It was all done quietly, professionally
44:50.
44:53The services will be there, the services
44:55can do it so it doesn't get out.
44:58And indeed, if a number of people
45:00entered, they terrorized those people,
45:02right?
45:05They ordered them, they could even have
45:07ordered them to change into sleeping
45:09clothes, they could have ordered them to
45:11bed, and the moment the man left, he
45:13went off to do those terrible things,
45:14which, of course, we completely condemn
45:16.
45:19Well, it could have been that his family
45:21was executed at that very moment.
45:24The attacker was wearing tactical gear
45:26and a protective vest.
45:28This indicates that
45:32his attack was not suicidal.
45:34He hoped to escape after the massacre.
45:36Yes.
45:38Unfortunately, yes, this indicates that
45:40.
45:43As long as such an explanation is
45:45possible, we cannot dismiss it.
45:48Investigators should accept all relevant
45:50hypotheses.
45:51In this case, the investigators could
45:53also be the perpetrators, so we should
45:55be the ones to explain it.
45:58Worse, ladies and gentlemen, in this
46:00case, the investigators 'principals
46:05are interested in exploiting this for
46:07purely political purposes.
46:09How do we know they are interested?
46:11Because they have been exploiting it
46:12from the very first hours.
46:18The bodies of the attacker's family, the
46:20bodies of the attacker's victims, both
46:22at home and in Krakow, right?
46:30They hadn't even fully cooled off,
46:33and Kierwiński was already saying that
46:35everything points to them being
46:37far-rightists, that he was guided by
46:38far-right ideology.
46:40This was exploited from the start for
46:42political purposes. And now imagine what
46:45would happen, purely hypothetical,
46:48purely theoretical, hypothetical
46:50situation.
46:52Imagine, ladies and gentlemen, suddenly
46:54learning that someone had framed him, in
46:56the sense that someone had forced him to
46:58do this.
47:03Threatening, perhaps if not, they would
47:05murder his family, and then they would
47:07murder him anyway. Of course, this would
47:09in no way, in no way, prove that these
47:11were Polish secret services. After all,
47:13it could have been a whole host of other
47:15services.
47:17Poland is heavily infiltrated by very
47:19different services, right?
47:26So this doesn't suggest at all—it
47:28doesn't even occur to me that these
47:29could be Polish secret services.
47:32It absolutely doesn't even occur to me.
47:34Or that it might have been commissioned
47:36by Polish politicians. It absolutely
47:37never even occurred to me.
47:43But if it turned out that it was some
47:45other service, and that this boy simply
47:47did this terrible thing, for which he
47:48will of course burn in hell, if he
47:50survived, he would be imprisoned, but
47:52because some service was operating in
47:53Poland, and they were operating in
47:55Poland because the Polish services
47:56weren't keeping an eye on them, and
47:58that's why this could have happened.
48:04Well, politically, it would be very
48:06damaging, wouldn't it?
48:18Besides, we see how it is.
48:21From the very first moments,
48:28from the very first moments, Mr. Żurek
48:30is using this—sorry, Mr. Kierwiński is
48:33using this politically to incite the
48:35right wing.
48:39We'll soon find out he was on President
48:41Nawrocki's Facebook groups, you'll see.
48:49That kind of thing, right?
48:51You'll see, things like this will soon
48:53appear, so to speak.
48:59From the very beginning, it's been used
49:01with lightning-fast political force, and
49:03despite the fact
49:06that subsequent facts completely
49:08contradicted it, it's
49:11as if the old Soviet principle applies
49:14here: if the facts contradict the
49:15hypothesis, so much the worse for the
49:18facts, right?
49:20Finally, a final argument was developed
49:22, titled "Well, we have it from computer
49:24analysis," because no one can refute it
49:26, because no one else but them has
49:28access to that computer.
49:32Dark as hell.
49:37Ladies and gentlemen, this next
49:44theory is even darker.
49:47It appears on the Globalna Info portal,
49:49and
49:55the title of this theory is "Operation
49:57Lajkonik" or "The Krakow Attack Was a
50:00False Flag."
50:04I emphasize that these are only
50:06conspiracy theories. I don't invent them
50:08, I don't spread them for purely
50:10entertainment purposes; I cite them for
50:12logical analysis.
50:16We've largely debunked that first theory
50:18—literally, a false flag.
50:24Operations under a foreign flag, a
50:26covert operation conducted to mislead,
50:28to create the impression that a given
50:30group, nation, state, and so on, is
50:32supposedly responsible for certain
50:34actions.
50:37Well, that would be somewhat accurate,
50:39ladies and gentlemen, because it's
50:41clearly obvious, and unfortunately, the
50:43obviousness here is so obvious, so
50:45blatant, that they're trying to create
50:47the impression that people with
50:49right-wing views are responsible for
50:50this tragedy.
50:54This is already getting very interesting
50:56.
50:58Ladies and gentlemen, a coordinated
51:00campaign by trolls from a group of
51:01trolls affiliated with the Civic
51:03Coalition has already appeared.
51:12They're suddenly blaming people with
51:14right-wing
51:17views for saying, "Oh, you have
51:19right-wing views, you're expressing your
51:21right-wing views, so it's your fault,
51:23that he did it because of you."
51:26And you'll see in a moment, because
51:27these Żurek supporters, Żurek supporters
51:30, and Kierwinia supporters are
51:31exceptionally ruthless.
51:34I could find out, damn it, that he liked
51:36one of my fan pages.
51:40How can I debunk that? And besides, even
51:42when he liked my fan page—well, excuse
51:44me—Tusk has photos with a pedophile.
51:47And on top of that, she also made
51:49pedophilic videos featuring her own
51:50child.
51:54By the way, if anyone wanted to say that
51:56if someone likes someone else's fan page
51:57, then the person who owns the page that
51:59was liked
52:03is guilty.
52:05Well, ladies and gentlemen, a person who
52:07runs a fan page has significantly less
52:09in common with someone who liked it than
52:11a political party leader has with a
52:12member of a political party with whom he
52:14has a photo.
52:19And who harmed very young people.
52:25And just to be clear, God forbid, I'm
52:27not saying Tusk is guilty of pedophilia
52:29.
52:34But just in case Tusk decides to connect
52:36someone completely innocent with this
52:38person based on such blunt associations
52:40, let me remind you: Tusk, you have a
52:42photo with a pedophile.
52:58The operation is intended to create the
53:00impression that it was carried out by
53:02those it aims to discredit, and
53:04unfortunately, that's very likely.
53:08While I'm not claiming, God forbid, that
53:10Tuskists are behind this attack or
53:12anything like that, and even here, that
53:14thought never even crossed my mind, this
53:20tragedy is clearly being exploited
53:22politically by Tusk to smear right-wing
53:24circles.
53:25All that's missing is for them to
53:27immediately claim that Nawrocki is to
53:29blame because he was part of some group
53:31led by Mr. Nawrocki.
53:34The name derives from the military
53:35operation False Flag Colors, an
53:37operation carried out in foreign
53:39national colors.
53:43False Flag operations are not limited to
53:45wartime operations but can also occur in
53:48peacetime.
53:52Often, the goal is to blame someone else
53:54, for example, a hostile state,
53:56organization, or ethnic group.
53:59In this case, it would be a political
54:01group.
54:02The plan
54:07to impose a state of emergency in Poland
54:09was carefully planned, with the
54:11political shockwaves in mind.
54:15The media is quick to report the
54:17perpetrator's identity, even the
54:23number of weapons his father owns. It's
54:25also interesting how the media found out
54:27.
54:27There must have been a leak from the
54:29registry. And who controls the registry
54:31? Politicians, of course.
54:34When MP Litewka was murdered in April of
54:36this year, there was silence about the
54:38perpetrator and his family, and nothing
54:40was said about him for a long time.
54:46The perpetrator, a young man, although a
54:48leftist, anti-fascist, and a fan of
54:50rezuns, was most likely a victim of mind
54:53control.
54:55As a reminder, I'm just reading this
54:57theory. I'm not claiming it's true.
55:02However, even he wouldn't be able to
55:04shoot accurately with a sniper rifle
55:05without extensive training.
55:10It's not a sniper rifle, it's an assault
55:12rifle, but he did shoot it while driving
55:14a moving car.
55:20At random people while driving at high
55:22speed through the narrow streets of
55:24Krakow's market square, full of natural
55:26obstacles.
55:29Such things only happen in action movies
55:31.
55:34There was supposed to be someone here,
55:36someone else, probably a trained sniper
55:38who suddenly vanished into the public's
55:40brain fog.
55:43I emphasize that I only read these
55:45theories; I don't identify with them.
55:51The parents and sister of the nominated
55:53perpetrator were quickly liquidated to
55:54avoid witnesses.
56:01Instead of using an ambulance, which had
56:03the appropriate emergency equipment, the
56:05medical services provided aid on the
56:07street in full view of onlookers,
56:08forgetting about something as basic as
56:10protecting the victims from hypothermia
56:12.
56:15That's a fact.
56:18Although in this case, it may be that
56:20they didn't want to move him because
56:21they believed that moving him would harm
56:23him and there was less chance he would
56:25survive if they moved him.
56:28However, there's another issue, ladies
56:30and gentlemen, the weapon wasn't secured
56:33.
56:34It's already clear that they were
56:36dealing with both the perpetrator and
56:38his victims
56:42, victims
56:46, victims
56:49, victims
56:53, police officers, right? Because they
56:55were victims too, because he shot them,
56:57right?
56:58Fortunately, they survived, but only
57:00thanks to the doctors, right?
57:04And Giwara was lying on the ground.
57:08Just so she could have been secured. Why
57:10didn't anyone secure it?
57:12Someone could have picked it up and
57:14started shooting.
57:17I don't know,
57:19just so there would be time for a
57:21photoshoot
58:06with
58:08that
58:12gun.
58:27It's very, ...
58:40Time will tell where this leads us.
58:45When the media and politicians keep
58:47their eyes wide open, we, thinking Poles
58:50, can then see more about
58:58and draw the right conclusions.
59:00This is terribly ungrammatical, so I've
59:02reworked it a bit.
59:06Are the decisions surrounding the events
59:08in Warsaw and Krakow a cold political
59:10calculation?
59:15A narrative is growing that the actions
59:17taken by Donald Tusk and Marcin
59:18Kierwiński were not a coincidence or
59:20solely out of concern for security.
59:26The pretext of a terrorist threat may be
59:28used as a convenient tool to block the
59:30Independence March.
59:33It's already clear that this won't
59:35happen.
59:36The Independence March will go ahead as
59:37normal.
59:38At least, that's what's being said for
59:40now. Let's hope nothing disrupts it,
59:42right?
59:44The removal of protesters from the
59:46Constitutional Tribunal and the
59:47introduction of a general ban on
59:49demonstrations.
59:54There are voices suggesting a connection
59:56between these actions and the tragedy in
59:58Krakow, where the red herrings may be
1:00:00intended to distract attention from the
1:00:01situation in the capital.
1:00:10In this interpretation, the introduction
1:00:12of a state of heightened alert under the
1:00:14guise of a threat to the service serves
1:00:16to block the demonstrations and prevent
1:00:18the smooth conduct of the upcoming
1:00:19elections.
1:00:28The way these events are presented by
1:00:29the government and its allies, including
1:00:31TVN, fits perfectly into this management
1:00:33style.
1:00:39Highlighting the perpetrator, appeals
1:00:41for restraint, and the weapon used—an AR
1:00:44-15 rifle with a breakaway bolt for the
1:00:46HK 416. Exactly, on the one hand,
1:00:48they're appealing against political
1:00:50exploitation, and on the other, they're
1:00:53exploiting it politically themselves.
1:00:58This is exceptionally despicable,
1:01:00because they're exploiting it
1:01:01politically, and they can.
1:01:04But if you try to counter by saying that
1:01:06, well, it's not true, exactly, that
1:01:08flag isn't right-wing at all.
1:01:12This flag often appears on the LGBT flag
1:01:15.
1:01:17On the unnamed flag, on the rainbow flag
1:01:19.
1:01:20Oh, you're playing politics on corpses.
1:01:23You're not allowed.
1:01:28They are using brazen social engineering
1:01:30, absolutely brazen, to ensure, ladies
1:01:32and gentlemen, that only they are
1:01:34allowed to speak on this topic, so that
1:01:36they can engage in what is technically
1:01:38called narrative control—that they can
1:01:40speak, no one else is.
1:02:02Produced domestically and mass-sent to
1:02:04Ukraine, which may now be returning to
1:02:05us, they can serve to calm public
1:02:07sentiment.
1:02:16Combining these facts and executions, a
1:02:18picture emerges of the government's
1:02:19defense mechanism, aimed at fully taking
1:02:21control of events in the country.
1:02:29But let's ask ourselves a key question:
1:02:31who is responsible for all this?
1:02:35Why were police forces from other
1:02:37regions of Poland brought to Warsaw?
1:02:43Leaving local communities behind,
1:02:44because there were protests in Warsaw,
1:02:46so they needed them.
1:02:55Where is the real narrative about the
1:02:57safety of residents of other cities in
1:02:58all of this?
1:03:00Has defending and occupying interests
1:03:02surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal
1:03:04become more important to the government
1:03:06than the safety of ordinary people?
1:03:10This doesn't determine the origins and
1:03:12motivations, but look, even the author
1:03:14of this theory says it doesn't determine
1:03:16the origins and motivations, but for now
1:03:18, we have some context to explain.
1:03:24The inscription, translated, "members of
1:03:26a non-Ukrainian legion that will come to
1:03:28Ukraine to repel the Russian invasion.
1:03:33I love the flag with the pirate motif.
1:03:39As the author of the post wrote, the
1:03:41person commenting on this post could
1:03:43have had Ukrainian roots.
1:03:46No, it's known that he didn't have
1:03:48Ukrainian roots. That's already
1:03:50confirmed. He didn't have Ukrainian
1:03:51roots.
1:03:55This refutes it; this theory has been
1:03:57refuted, and it was refuted not by
1:03:59Kierwe and his ilk, but by independent,
1:04:01normal people.
1:04:05He didn't, no, he didn't have Ukrainian
1:04:07roots.
1:04:11This is purely a matter of logistics,
1:04:12ladies and gentlemen.
1:04:14That's
1:04:20how
1:04:24I see
1:04:31it, because this theory has been refuted
1:04:33.
1:04:42So I won't read theories that have
1:04:43already been refuted, right?
1:04:47Poland has been largely disarmed by the
1:04:49free transfer of our military resources
1:04:51in the form of equipment to Ukraine.
1:04:58At a time when World War III for global
1:05:00hegemony is being fought between the US
1:05:02and China, our homeland has been robbed
1:05:04of the ability to respond militarily to
1:05:06hostile attempts against our country.
1:05:12This puts Poland in a very vulnerable
1:05:14position, which hostile services, lodges
1:05:16, and states are well aware of.
1:05:20Foreign troops are stationed on our
1:05:21homeland's territory.
1:05:24I'm thinking, for example, of US
1:05:25soldiers, but they are allied. After all
1:05:28, we are in an alliance with the US,
1:05:30called NATO.
1:05:34Do you think this situation guarantees
1:05:36our security?
1:05:39It seems to me that in the current
1:05:41situation, there is no such thing as a
1:05:42guarantee, at most, an increased
1:05:44probability.
1:05:45Or is it quite the opposite?
1:05:48Is a false flag operation, for example,
1:05:50carried out by US soldiers from Polish
1:05:52territory at the behest of the Pentagon
1:05:54, a real threat or fiction?
1:05:57In my opinion, fiction, considering that
1:05:59the Americans want to end the war in
1:06:01Ukraine. I don't believe the Americans
1:06:03would pull off such a false flag
1:06:05operation. Not now. In 2022? Yes. In
1:06:092023? Yes. Now? No. I don't believe it.
1:06:20Oh.
1:06:27Then, ladies and gentlemen, there are
1:06:29political manifestos.
1:06:31Let me not read political manifestos;
1:06:33this will be an entertainment series,
1:06:35and we won't be playing political
1:06:39manifestos
1:06:41here.
1:06:43Yes, but there is, ladies and gentlemen
1:06:45, a second theory on the same website,
1:06:47somewhat contradicting the first one.
1:06:50Even quite strongly contradicting the
1:06:51first one.
1:06:53Again, global news. Operation
1:06:59What happened behind the scenes of media
1:07:01psychological operations?
1:07:07Have you ever wondered how easily it is
1:07:08possible to change the lives of an
1:07:10entire society?
1:07:13How quickly people can forget something
1:07:15that only yesterday they considered the
1:07:17most important problem in the world?
1:07:20Of course. As an internet creator
1:07:22commenting on reality, I encounter it
1:07:24all the time.
1:07:26Ladies and gentlemen, not long ago, the
1:07:28number one topic was the attack on the
1:07:30Constitutional Tribunal.
1:07:32Now it's no longer discussed at all.
1:07:34Before the attack on the Constitutional
1:07:35Tribunal, the number one topic was the
1:07:37protests in Western Europe, especially
1:07:39the sacking of Paris. Now, no one cares
1:07:42. Two or three days, there's no topic,
1:07:44because something new has emerged.
1:07:49How little it sometimes takes for
1:07:51someone we hated to suddenly become
1:07:52likeable, and an institution we
1:07:54perceived and condemned to begin to be
1:07:56associated with heroism.
1:08:00For some time now, I've been observing
1:08:02these mechanisms with increasing
1:08:04interest.
1:08:05I'm not talking about one person, a
1:08:07specific political party, television
1:08:09station, or event. I'm talking about
1:08:11something much broader.
1:08:16The way collective consciousness is
1:08:18shaped.
1:08:20Yes, that's all I'm talking about:
1:08:22propaganda.
1:08:26Persuasion, social engineering, image
1:08:29creation,
1:08:34attention management, and influencing
1:08:36people's decisions, opinions, thinking,
1:08:39sympathy, and attention.
1:08:43Let's face it, there are mechanisms of
1:08:45influence whose effectiveness is
1:08:46confirmed by decades of scientific
1:08:48research, and they operate regardless of
1:08:50whether we're aware of them.
1:08:54Take the events in Krakow.
1:08:57This is relevant now.
1:08:59Two police officers are injured
1:09:03during a dangerous intervention.
1:09:05Information about their health, witness
1:09:07accounts, comments, and expressions of
1:09:09solidarity are emerging.
1:09:13Krystyna Stanowski is launching a
1:09:15fundraiser, and the public is donating a
1:09:17huge amount of money.
1:09:34>> And I don't intend to question the
1:09:35purpose of this help.
1:09:37Everyone has the right to support
1:09:38whomever they want.
1:09:41I also don't intend to rob police
1:09:42officers of their courage simply because
1:09:44undertaking dangerous interventions is
1:09:46part of their professional duties and
1:09:48oath, even at the risk of their lives.
1:09:52Duty doesn't exclude heroism.
1:09:54I'm interested in something entirely
1:09:56different.
1:09:57My attention is drawn in a completely
1:09:59different direction.
1:10:01Remember the protests before the
1:10:03Constitutional Tribunal, the street
1:10:05demonstrations, and periods of intense
1:10:07social conflict.
1:10:10For some in society, the police were a
1:10:12symbol of oppression, brutality, and the
1:10:14execution of controversial orders.
1:10:17There was no shortage of insults
1:10:19directed at officers online.
1:10:21It's basically a theater.
1:10:23Now we see a different story.
1:10:26Police officers are portrayed as brave
1:10:28people, sacrificing their health and
1:10:29lives for the safety of others.
1:10:33Does one image necessarily exclude the
1:10:35other?
1:10:36No. A police officer can behave
1:10:38inappropriately during a demonstration.
1:10:42Another can demonstrate exceptional
1:10:43courage during an intervention.
1:10:50Both events may be true, but the way the
1:10:52media portrays specific events
1:10:53influences which associations become
1:10:55most readily available in our memories
1:10:57at any given moment.
1:11:02Because, look, even hooligans, who can't
1:11:05stand the police, see their limits and
1:11:11applaud officers who, if they
1:11:15could, would have drowned them in a
1:11:16spoonful of water yesterday.
1:11:19And all it took was one event.
1:11:22Just one event, one theater, and
1:11:24everything changes.
1:11:26Thoughts, attention, sympathies, image,
1:11:29everything. And this is where the real
1:11:31story begins.
1:11:36In 1972, Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw
1:11:39published a study on the phenomenon
1:11:41known as agenda setting, the
1:11:42establishment of a hierarchy of topics
1:11:44in public debate.
1:11:51Researchers showed that the media play a
1:11:53significant role in shaping which issues
1:11:55audiences consider most important.
1:12:00Of course, this doesn't mean the media
1:12:02have absolute control over human thought
1:12:03.
1:12:08It means that the frequency and manner
1:12:10of exposing information can influence
1:12:12our sense of its importance.
1:12:16And now, think back to the beginning of
1:12:192022. For two years, the world was
1:12:21gripped by the COVID-19 pandemic, daily
1:12:23infection statistics.
1:12:32And then the war began, and no one cared
1:12:34anymore.
1:12:36Deaths, press conferences, vaccinations
1:12:39, restrictions, masks, hospitals,
1:12:41experts, discussions about new variants
1:12:44of the virus, fear, panic, empty streets
1:12:46.
1:12:50The topic dominated television, radio,
1:12:52news portals, and the conversations of
1:12:54millions until February 24, 2022. Russia
1:12:57launched a full-scale invasion of
1:12:59Ukraine, and almost overnight, the
1:13:01dominant topic of news coverage changed
1:13:03.
1:13:08Instead of daily pandemic reports,
1:13:10bombings, refugees, sanctions, warfare,
1:13:13politicians' speeches, and fears and
1:13:15concerns about Europe's security took
1:13:17center stage.
1:13:21The pandemic wasn't over in 2020, nor
1:13:23was it over on February 24. As recently
1:13:26as March 9, 2022, the World Health
1:13:28Organization was emphasizing that the
1:13:31pandemic was still ongoing.
1:13:37The formal end of the international
1:13:39public health emergency was only
1:13:40announced in May 2023, yet there was a
1:13:42sudden shift in priorities in the media
1:13:44landscape.
1:13:48And with it, public attention.
1:13:51Why?
1:13:52Because a new, massive event emerged
1:13:54that demanded immediate attention.
1:14:00We can't experience every threat with
1:14:02the same intensity for long.
1:14:08And when a new, massive event occurs,
1:14:10previous problems can be pushed to the
1:14:12background, even though they still exist
1:14:14.
1:14:17And here we come to one of the most
1:14:19important points of my reflections.
1:14:23Just because something stops being
1:14:24talked about doesn't mean it's gone.
1:14:27And just because something is talked
1:14:29about constantly doesn't automatically
1:14:31mean it's the most important issue in
1:14:32our lives.
1:14:37In 1973, Amos Tversky and Daniel
1:14:39Kahneman described a mechanism known as
1:14:41the availability heuristic.
1:14:46It largely
1:14:52relies on the fact that people, when
1:14:54assessing the frequency or probability
1:14:56of events, are often guided by the ease
1:14:58with which they can recall examples of
1:15:00them from memory.
1:15:04In other words, if you spend several
1:15:06weeks watching news about plane crashes
1:15:08, you might start to overestimate the
1:15:10risk of air travel.
1:15:15If you constantly see crime reports, you
1:15:17might feel the threat is greater than
1:15:19the actual statistics suggest.
1:15:24If the media primarily focuses on the
1:15:26pandemic for a long time, this topic
1:15:28becomes incredibly accessible to you.
1:15:32And when war occurs,
1:15:35images of war begin to dominate memory
1:15:37and conversations.
1:15:41Not because the previous problem has
1:15:43suddenly disappeared, but because the
1:15:45information environment has changed.
1:15:52This phenomenon is crucial because
1:15:54people often confuse the intensity of
1:15:56media exposure with the objective
1:15:57magnitude of the threat.
1:16:03Therefore, it's worth examining not only
1:16:05what the media is reporting but also
1:16:07what they are currently not showing and
1:16:08asking why.
1:16:12Of course, not every story omitted from
1:16:14the news is intentionally hidden.
1:16:20Newsrooms must choose from thousands of
1:16:22events, and major disasters or wars have
1:16:24real news value.
1:16:32But the very choice of topics has
1:16:34consequences for the community and
1:16:36awareness.
1:16:46In 1982, Szanto Lajengar, Mark Peters,
1:16:48and Donald Kinder published experimental
1:16:50research showing that the way topics
1:16:52were presented on television news
1:16:54influenced which issues viewers
1:16:55considered important and the criteria
1:16:57they used to evaluate the president.
1:17:09They called this phenomenon priming.
1:17:12Now consider
1:17:19how powerful its influence can be in an
1:17:21era when people don't watch a single
1:17:23evening newscast but instead receive
1:17:25information throughout the day from
1:17:27television, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube,
1:17:29and online portals.
1:17:35It's no longer just about what you read
1:17:36.
1:17:38It's about what you see 10 times.
1:17:42What your friends comment on, what an
1:17:44influencer repeats, what sparks outrage
1:17:46?
1:17:51What appears in a short video, what an
1:17:53algorithm deems intense enough to show
1:17:55you again.
1:17:57In
1:18:00this way, certain topics begin to
1:18:02dominate others.
1:18:06And not always because they are
1:18:07objectively more important.
1:18:12Sometimes because they are more
1:18:14emotional, more spectacular, more
1:18:16controversial, or easier to tell.
1:18:20Consider Książula.
1:18:23A person comes to a restaurant, tries
1:18:25the food, and forms an opinion. One
1:18:27positive opinion can generate enormous
1:18:29interest in the establishment.
1:18:32There are queues, recordings, comments,
1:18:34and subsequent publications.
1:18:37The product remains the same, but its
1:18:39social significance changes.
1:18:43Just yesterday it was an ordinary kebab
1:18:45, today it's a kebab recommended by
1:18:47Książul.
1:18:50Does that mean people are stupid?
1:18:53No. It means that recommendations,
1:18:55authority, and social proof matter.
1:19:00The problem begins when we start
1:19:01treating someone else's opinion as
1:19:03objective truth.
1:19:04Alfred
1:19:08Korzybski says that the map isn't the
1:19:09territory.
1:19:12Speaking of Książul, something else
1:19:14terrifies me greatly.
1:19:17Because I can quite rationally explain
1:19:19the fact that Książul comes to a
1:19:21restaurant, says it's good, and suddenly
1:19:23lines form.
1:19:25Not just in the way the gentleman who
1:19:26wrote that article did.
1:19:29People simply might not have known that
1:19:30this restaurant existed and that it was
1:19:32good.
1:19:34It doesn't have to be that they go just
1:19:36because they like it, because someone
1:19:37told them it was good.
1:19:40It could be that they simply didn't know
1:19:42beforehand.
1:19:44What's quite terrifying is if a priest
1:19:46comes in and says a restaurant sucks,
1:19:48and people who used to go there and
1:19:50liked it suddenly stop enjoying it.
1:19:55Because in a situation where someone
1:19:56didn't know about the restaurant, heard
1:19:58about it for the first time, and goes to
1:20:00try it out, I think it's okay.
1:20:02Because someone didn't have an opinion
1:20:04and now they can go and form their own
1:20:06opinion, right?
1:20:10But then again, because of issues upon
1:20:12issues
1:20:18upon issues of sheer scale, right?
1:20:21Lines form. If suddenly, I don't know,
1:20:231,000 people want to try a particular
1:20:25restaurant, it's obvious that that
1:20:26restaurant will suddenly start
1:20:28attracting a lot of customers.
1:20:30Worse still, it works the other way
1:20:32around.
1:20:34If someone had an opinion about the
1:20:35restaurant, said it was good, went there
1:20:37, and suddenly changed their opinion
1:20:39even though nothing had changed, just
1:20:41because some outside authority told them
1:20:43it's bad now, and now you won't like it
1:20:45anymore.
1:20:46And someone says," Yes, yes, I don't
1:20:48like it anymore. "
1:20:58And notice, this is how it really works
1:21:00in many, many places.
1:21:02Well, in 2022, we were told to hate
1:21:04Russians, and suddenly people started
1:21:06hating them completely, right?
1:21:10They called them ogres or trolls, ogres
1:21:12or orcs, I think.
1:21:16So there was dehumanization, a
1:21:18dehumanizing element, pure Nazism.
1:21:21And several dozen percent of Polish
1:21:22society fell for it just because
1:21:24politicians and authorities ordered it.
1:21:27Right? And that's interesting, these
1:21:28were very often people who had nothing
1:21:30against Russians before. Suddenly, they
1:21:32started hating them just because they
1:21:34told us to hate them on TV.
1:21:36So they started doing what they told us
1:21:38to do.
1:21:39It's incredible.
1:21:50An opinion about reality isn't reality
1:21:52itself.
1:21:53A food review isn't food.
1:21:55Political commentary isn't fact.
1:21:58An interview with a public figure isn't
1:22:00a complete portrayal of their character
1:22:02, and an emotional report isn't
1:22:03automatically a complete explanation of
1:22:05an event.
1:22:08Meanwhile, people often forget this
1:22:09distinction.
1:22:12They watch one piece and form an opinion
1:22:14. They watch another and change their
1:22:16mind.
1:22:17He watches the third one and begins to
1:22:19think he understood everything from the
1:22:20start.
1:22:23Yet, he may not have received any new
1:22:25information or facts.
1:22:30Only the way the story is told has
1:22:32changed, and here another phenomenon is
1:22:34worth mentioning: framing.
1:22:41The same person can be portrayed as a
1:22:43ruthless entrepreneur or as someone who
1:22:45worked hard their entire life to achieve
1:22:47success.
1:22:50The same politician can be described as
1:22:52a decisive leader or an arrogant
1:22:54autocrat.
1:22:57The same protest can be portrayed as a
1:22:59fight for civil rights or as a
1:23:00disruption of public order.
1:23:04The choice of words, images, and context
1:23:06influences the perception of an event.
1:23:10This doesn't mean that all interventions
1:23:11are equally truthful.
1:23:14It means that the way information is
1:23:16presented can direct attention to
1:23:18specific aspects of reality.
1:23:22Now consider public image whitewashing.
1:23:25Someone spends years building a negative
1:23:27reputation.
1:23:28A scandal occurs. People criticize them
1:23:31. Suddenly, they give a long, emotional
1:23:33interview. They talk about their
1:23:35childhood, family, problems, and
1:23:37difficult experiences.
1:23:40They show up with their dog, and the
1:23:41comments read," I didn't like you, but
1:23:43now I've changed my mind.
1:23:46"And in most cases, it works.
1:23:49I think only Dubiel's stunt with the dog
1:23:51didn't work. Is that a bad thing? Not
1:23:53always.
1:23:54A person should be able to change their
1:23:56opinion when they learn new facts.
1:24:00But it's worth asking whether they
1:24:02actually learned new facts about
1:24:03previous allegations, or simply saw the
1:24:05person in a more sympathetic world.
1:24:10Sympathy isn't proof of honesty.
1:24:12Emotion isn't proof of innocence.
1:24:18And a well-conducted interview doesn't
1:24:20invalidate previous actions, and that's
1:24:22precisely why the ability to convey an
1:24:24emotional impression, to separate
1:24:25emotional impressions from an assessment
1:24:27of the facts, is so crucial.
1:24:33A similar mechanism can be observed in
1:24:34all charity events. Take the Great
1:24:36Orchestra of Christmas Charity (WOŚP).
1:24:38The red heart, the finale, volunteers,
1:24:41auctions, broadcasts, familiar faces.
1:24:45Over the years, a recognizable system of
1:24:47symbols and social rituals has developed
1:24:49.
1:24:51For many people, participating in this
1:24:53campaign is more than just donating
1:24:55money.
1:24:56It's also an expression of solidarity
1:24:58and a sense of belonging. The same
1:24:59applies to huge online campaigns, such
1:25:02as the" Easy Ganga "fundraiser for
1:25:03Cancer Fighters. Incidentally, there
1:25:05were probably some problems with the
1:25:07money later.
1:25:09They demonstrate how effectively people
1:25:11can be mobilized around a specific goal
1:25:13.
1:25:14An emotional story, a live broadcast.
1:25:20Celebrities, a growing count, and a
1:25:22sense of collective action can generate
1:25:24extraordinary engagement.
1:25:30It's great if the result is real help,
1:25:32but let's not forget one thing: a noble
1:25:34goal doesn't stop persuasion mechanisms
1:25:36from working.
1:25:40They still work, but they can serve a
1:25:42purpose.
1:25:44This is an extremely important
1:25:45distinction, because persuasion itself
1:25:47isn't inherently bad.
1:25:50It only becomes a problem when it's
1:25:52based on deception, concealment of
1:25:54information, or deliberately limiting
1:25:56the ability to assess one's own
1:25:57abilities.
1:26:01Why is it worth asking why this
1:26:02particular story garners so much
1:26:04attention?
1:26:07Well, because
1:26:11thousands of people need help every day
1:26:12.
1:26:13Every day someone gets sick, someone
1:26:15loses their health, someone needs money
1:26:17for treatment, but not every tragedy
1:26:19makes the front pages.
1:26:22Not everyone receives the support of
1:26:24celebrities.
1:26:27Not every tragedy becomes a national
1:26:29event, and that's precisely why it's
1:26:30worth remembering that the visibility of
1:26:32suffering isn't a measure of its
1:26:34magnitude.
1:26:37But let's get back to the pandemic and
1:26:38war.
1:26:47This example is particularly important
1:26:49because it highlights something we often
1:26:51overlook.
1:26:52Human attention spans aren't infinite.
1:26:56We can worry about many things, but we
1:26:58can't devote the same amount of time and
1:27:00energy to each.
1:27:05When a new, dramatic event occurs,
1:27:07previous problems often fade into the
1:27:09background, and that's why it's worth
1:27:11asking yourself, what's occupying my
1:27:13attention today?
1:27:16Why this particular one?
1:27:19Is it because it's truly the most
1:27:20important thing in my life?
1:27:25Or because I've seen this topic dozens
1:27:26of times in the past week?
1:27:30Or maybe because everyone around me is
1:27:32talking about it?
1:27:35These are uncomfortable questions
1:27:36because they force us to question our
1:27:38own independence, and yet almost all of
1:27:40us like to think we have our own
1:27:41opinions.
1:27:44And ladies and gentlemen, this is where
1:27:46Form 3003 comes in, something Artur
1:27:48Wojtowicz and I discussed today on the
1:27:51podcast at 4:00 AM.
1:27:53You work from dawn till dusk, dutifully
1:27:55pay all your contributions, and are
1:27:57happy that you have something saved for
1:27:59a rainy day.
1:28:00Wonderful.
1:28:02It's just a shame that in a moment you
1:28:04could cease to own your wallet and
1:28:05become merely its temporary depository.
1:28:10The state, with a smile on its face, is
1:28:12trying to make a copy of the key to your
1:28:14safe and hand it over to officials.
1:28:20Under the guise of pompous slogans about
1:28:23national security and the protection of
1:28:25democracy, the Sejm recently pushed
1:28:27through Form 3003. The result: 240 MPs
1:28:29from the ruling coalition and the Left
1:28:31agreed that it was a brilliant idea to
1:28:33take citizens by the throat.
1:28:38202 opposition politicians voted against
1:28:40it. One abstained.
1:28:43It's important to remember the name of
1:28:44this evil man.
1:28:46Sasin abstained.
1:28:49What exactly have they prepared for us?
1:28:52Regulations that make Orwell's Big
1:28:54Brother seem like a harmless amateur.
1:28:58Under the new law, an ordinary
1:28:59bureaucrat behind a desk, without any
1:29:01ruling from an independent court, will
1:29:03be able to freeze your assets with a
1:29:05single administrative decision.
1:29:07Stryk.
1:29:08The cogs in the machine are turning, and
1:29:10from one day to the next, you have
1:29:12nothing to live on, because the decision
1:29:14is immediately enforceable by the court
1:29:16.
1:29:17Who needs that, since the government
1:29:19knows best?
1:29:20Moreover, ladies and gentlemen, there's
1:29:22no official accountability there.
1:29:25Because even if it were like, okay, they
1:29:27can freeze your assets, but the official
1:29:29,
1:29:36if the official makes
1:29:41a mistake, they destroy that official's
1:29:43life.
1:29:46Just as they destroy your life by
1:29:48deciding to freeze your assets, if they
1:29:50make a mistake, their life is destroyed
1:29:52.
1:29:54The official's assets must be frozen for
1:29:56as many days as your assets were frozen
1:29:58.
1:30:02And just as you struggled to eat, the
1:30:04official must struggle to eat, including
1:30:05the minister.
1:30:11So it's not like the official did it, so
1:30:13we won't bother the minister about it
1:30:14here.
1:30:19No. If the official from the Ministry of
1:30:21Interior and Administration did it, the
1:30:23minister must suffer the same
1:30:24consequences as the official for every
1:30:26single person.
1:30:29Then there will be no abuse.
1:30:32If an official knows that if he's made a
1:30:34mistake, he'll suffer the same fate as
1:30:36his victims, then he'll think twice.
1:30:39But if he knows he's not responsible at
1:30:41all, damn it, he might do it even out of
1:30:43anger.
1:30:44Right?
1:30:45You pissed him off, you didn't open the
1:30:47door for him, you didn't say hello to
1:30:49him at the dumpster, he'll freeze your
1:30:51assets and take revenge on you.
1:31:00What could you be blacklisted for?
1:31:02An open sanctions list.
1:31:06For very flexible-sounding manipulation
1:31:08of information.
1:31:12In practice, this means that anyone with
1:31:14a foul mouth and a penchant for
1:31:15criticizing something unbecoming can be
1:31:17targeted.
1:31:20That is, the government.
1:31:22For example, in this case, Kierwiński
1:31:24and Żurek. Kierwiński, by the way, will
1:31:26decide who to include. For example, EU
1:31:29policy, government actions, issues
1:31:31related to the migration crisis, and
1:31:33many others.
1:31:34If you have your own opinion, prepare
1:31:36for cosmic penalties.
1:31:38The bill envisages imposing fines of up
1:31:40to 20 million złoty on individuals and
1:31:42up to 200 million złoty on companies.
1:31:47This isn't a scare tactic, it's a brutal
1:31:49lashing out at anyone who dares to step
1:31:51out of line and ask uncomfortable
1:31:53questions.
1:31:58If you just thought, screw it, I'll
1:32:00withdraw the cash and bury it in the
1:32:02garden, I have bad news.
1:32:06The bill also drastically tightens the
1:32:08noose around money held outside banks.
1:32:14Sure, you can anonymously buy carrots at
1:32:16your local grocery store or bread at the
1:32:18bakery because the sellers don't have a
1:32:20built-in scanner for government
1:32:21sanctions lists, but try legally paying
1:32:23your electricity bill, renting an
1:32:25apartment, buying something more
1:32:26expensive, or ordering a courier in your
1:32:28own name.
1:32:33Wherever a transaction requires entering
1:32:36personal data, the system will shoot you
1:32:38down in a split second because companies
1:32:40are required to verify their customers.
1:32:44Furthermore, the bill prohibits anyone
1:32:46from accepting money from you, under
1:32:48penalty of millions of złoty in fines
1:32:50for the recipient.
1:32:54And if, during a possible search, those
1:32:56sad gentlemen find your blackheads under
1:32:58your mattress, they will be physically
1:33:00confiscated.
1:33:05We are one step away from a reality
1:33:07where being cut off from oxygen and your
1:33:09life's work is punishable by dissent.
1:33:14The bill from Form 3003 has just gone to
1:33:16the Senate, and then all that's left is
1:33:18the president's desk, which will either
1:33:20sign it or veto it.
1:33:24Or maybe refer it to the Constitutional
1:33:26Tribunal, and that's exactly what we
1:33:28should be focusing on right now:
1:33:30politicians are trying to make us look
1:33:37terrible, but ladies and gentlemen,
1:33:39they're not talking about that at all,
1:33:41because coincidentally, there was an
1:33:42attack just now.
1:33:44And here's my question for you.
1:33:47If a civil servant can ruin your life
1:33:49with a single click of the mouse for an
1:33:51online comment without a trial, what
1:33:53kind of country are we living in?
1:33:56A democratic state of law?
1:34:00Or a private estate where having your
1:34:02own opinions is a luxury that many may
1:34:04soon be unable to afford.
1:34:07Exactly, ladies and gentlemen.
1:34:10Since the material is already an hour
1:34:12and a half long, I'll
1:34:15end it here.
1:34:17Stay tuned, see you soon.
1:34:19The first line of the description is a
1:34:21podcast material based on a letter from
1:34:23one of them from last Sunday.
1:34:26We need a little over 1,000 likes to
1:34:28reach 15,000, and additional material on
1:34:31Thursday. Cheers, see you soon. Bye.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Strzelanina w Krakowie i Teorie Konspiracyjne! Dlaczego Sąsiedzi Nic Nie Słyszeli? - Analiza Ator by wideoprezentacje, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 11,052 words across 2,053 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.