YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → Stało Się! Wojsko Ruszyło! + Atak Na Samolot FlyDubai To Prowokacja?! - Analiza Ator

Stało Się! Wojsko Ruszyło! + Atak Na Samolot FlyDubai To Prowokacja?! - Analiza Ator — Transcript

by wideoprezentacje · 14,310 words · 2,175 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00Good morning, everyone. I warmly
0:01welcome you to today’s podcast: eight
0:04topics. The whole thing, as usual, will
0:06be divided into two parts. Part one is
0:08a brief teaser of each of these topics,
0:10so that you know what to expect in
0:12today's material. And part two is a
0:18comprehensive discussion of each topic,
0:20so you have something to listen to in
0:21the coming day and stay well-informed.
0:26And I will say this right away. The
0:34headline topic will be number two,
0:35because late at night, after the editor
0:38went to bed, I realized there is an
0:40even stronger topic—namely, a
0:41provocation so poorly stitched together
0:43, where absolutely nothing adds up. I
0:52don’t know what surprises me more:
0:54that someone pulled off this
0:55provocation so brazenly. Or who? Israel
1:00—well, the Mossad carried it out. Or
1:08the fact that no media outlet noticed
1:10it, including the so-called alternative
1:12ones; while mainstream media might have
1:14noticed but are afraid to speak out for
1:16fear of repercussions from owners,
1:18owners of owners, or perhaps
1:19advertisers, it is shocking that none
1:21of the "truth-seekers" caught it.
1:33Ladies and gentlemen, suffice it to say
1:35that the man who allegedly prevented a
1:37plane hijacking—a plane that later
1:39had a layover, where they spent a lot
1:41of time in the airport zone—Listen,
1:43he didn't even change his clothes. All
1:53of this so that, right after landing in
1:55Tel Aviv, he could attend a press
1:56conference with Mr. Netanyahu in his
1:58original bloody undershirt and original
2:00bloody socks. The idea that this isn't
2:08a setup—that he simply didn't change
2:10because he likes sitting in bloody
2:11socks—is even less credible. It reeks
2:19even more of a setup, for miles, than
2:21the situation a long time ago, a few
2:23years back, in a certain town where the
2:25bad guys committed crimes. That part
2:30isn’t surprising, because the bad
2:32guys often commit crimes, but usually,
2:34criminals hide the bodies; why would
2:36they flaunt their crime? But here,
2:40please—the criminals left the bodies
2:42out in the open. They just left them
2:45lying in the street. Strange, right?
2:48Even stranger is that the town was
2:50later recaptured by the good guys. And
2:53do you know what the good guys did?
2:55These were the bodies of their fellow
2:57citizens, their own kin. What do the
3:00good guys do when they enter a town and
3:02see bodies? Do they respectfully
3:07collect them from the street so they
3:09aren’t scattered, so rats don't eat
3:11them, so dogs don't desecrate them? No.
3:16They call international politicians to
3:18come with international media to take a
3:20look. And do you know what is the
3:24strangest part of all this? Days, even
3:28though there were stray rats everywhere
3:30that normally feed on corpses, they
3:32didn't touch these particular bodies.
3:35So ladies and gentlemen, an incredible
3:37story. Incredible, one from a few years
3:40ago, and this one is even more
3:41incredible. That is why it will land in
3:45first place, because I think it is even
3:47more incredible than the fact that the
3:48troops have moved. So ladies and
3:52gentlemen, first a teaser, and then a
3:54comprehensive discussion of these eight
3:55, because today there will be eight
3:57topics. Topic number 1. A foiled attack
4:04on a Fly Dubai flight to Israel, which
4:05has so much information chaos and makes
4:07so little sense that if I hadn't seen
4:09the footage, I wouldn't have believed
4:10something like that even happened. And
4:16so I wonder if it isn't a provocation
4:18by Israeli services, because I will say
4:20it straight, I am convinced that it is
4:22a media provocation by the Israeli
4:24services. And all this so that
4:28Netanyahu has a distraction and can
4:30again unite Israelis around the flag.
4:35This is actually being talked about
4:37officially in Israel, that the guy, hm,
4:42sacrificed the lives of a large number
4:44of his own citizens, fellow countrymen,
4:46people of his own nationality, in order
4:48to have a pretext to unleash an armed
4:50conflict. And there was more and more
4:53talk there that the Israelis would
4:55forcibly remove this Netanyahu from
4:56office. And here you go, an attack on a
4:58plane and it's no longer being talked
5:00about. But no, that is a pure
5:02coincidence. It's just that God took
5:04such good care of Netanyahu that He
5:06sent this, it's a miracle. A somewhat
5:09unholy miracle, because it is suffering
5:11after all, but a miracle, because it is
5:13impossible for Israeli services to be
5:15behind it. Or maybe it is possible
5:18after all? Topic number 2 is also
5:26extremely important. It has already
5:28become certain. The troops have moved,
5:32and that, ladies and gentlemen, is
5:33unfortunately not good news. Quite the
5:36opposite. Topic number three. Gazeta
5:41Wyborcza decided that a sign calling
5:43for sexual intercourse with the UPA, an
5:46"F-U" sign, is anti-Ukrainian. So we
5:52have once again a situation where
5:53someone is telling us that UPA, Bandera
5:55, Banderaism, and Ukraine are all the
5:57same thing, that if someone doesn't
5:59like the UPA, it's as if they didn't
6:01like Ukrainians. Well, what will happen
6:04next? Because I, for example, once
6:10signed an anti-Nazi manifesto and took
6:12part in activities aimed at countering
6:20neo-Nazism. That was at the turn of the
6:2390s and 2000s. I hope it doesn't turn
6:27out now that I didn't like Ukraine back
6:29then at the turn of the 90s and 2000s.
6:32I, ladies and gentlemen, to this day
6:34have nothing against Ukraine. I don't
6:38like bandits, I don't like criminals, I
6:40don't like bribe-takers, I don't like
6:42murderers, I don't like Bandera
6:43supporters, I don't like the corrupt
6:45government of Ukraine, I don't like
6:47demanding Ukrainian politicians, and
6:49all those who profit from this war. As
6:54for the Ukrainians themselves, I have
6:56no negative emotions. So, ladies and
6:59gentlemen, what comes next? Someone,
7:01for example, I don't know, geez, there
7:03is this association, "Never Again." Its
7:09goal is to remind people of German
7:10crimes during World War II and to
7:12remind them that Nazism is evil, lest
7:14it turn out that they are some kind of
7:16Germanophobes. Well, it seems to me,
7:21however, that one should not equate the
7:23criminal ideology of the UPA with
7:24Ukraine. And if we do equate them—
7:29that the UPA, Bandera, Banderism, and
7:31Ukraine are the same thing—then all
7:33Ukrainians should be immediately
7:35expelled from Poland, because, ladies
7:37and gentlemen, Banderism and the UPA
7:39are a criminal, totalitarian system
7:41directed against us Poles, so I
7:43wouldn't go in the direction Gazeta
7:44Wyborcza is taking. Not every Ukrainian
7:48is a Banderite. However, those who are
7:51Banderites, regardless of their
7:53nationality, should be kicked out of
7:55Poland. As I understand it, the people
7:59working at Gazeta Wyborcza are
8:01Banderites; regardless of their
8:02nationality, they should be expelled. A
8:06large portion have second passports.
8:09You are welcome to leave. FlyDubai
8:12flies to Tel Aviv. Be my guest. Topic
8:16number three. Marcin Romanowski has
8:18received a letter of safe conduct. He
8:21cannot be arrested or temporarily
8:23detained. He received it from a Polish
8:26court. This is an incredible failure
8:28for the Tusk government, because now he
8:30will come to Poland and his trial will
8:32begin. Mr. Romanowski is Ziobro's
8:37right-hand man, accused of some pretty
8:39serious scams in the context of the
8:41Justice Fund and the whole disgusting
8:43affair that was happening in connection
8:45with this Justice Fund, where money
8:47that was supposed to go to crime
8:49victims, for instance, ended up in the
8:51foundation of a certain priest, who,
8:53among other things, built in the
8:54complex—this is an open secret—a
8:56television studio so that a former PiS
8:58councilor, now a PiS MP. Could film his
9:04podcasts there. I know, because he
9:06bragged to me about it. So, well, it's
9:14a disgusting affair. And now look,
9:15Romanowski will return to Poland and
9:17will be answering for himself entirely
9:19while at liberty. Nothing can be done
9:21to him. Is there any chance his trial
9:24will end before the end of, before the
9:262027 elections? None whatsoever. What
9:31will happen in 2027? Civic Platform
9:33will lose power. I meant the Civic
9:35Coalition. Who will come to power? Well
9:37, among others, PiS. What will happen
9:39then? Well, Mr. Romanowski’s
9:42principal, Mr. Ziobro, will return to
9:45Poland to go from an exile wanted by
9:47arrest warrants to becoming Minister of
9:49Justice and simultaneously Prosecutor
9:51General. Since the prosecutor's office
9:55is a strictly hierarchical institution,
9:57Prosecutor General Ziobro will issue an
9:59order to, the one who supervises the
10:05prosecutor handling the investigation
10:07into Mr. Ziobro, to withdraw any and
10:09all charges against Mr. Ziobro. Mr.
10:12Ziobro will be completely innocent.
10:15Because until you are convicted, you
10:17are innocent, and there won't be a case
10:18, so he will be innocent. Mr. Ziobro
10:21will probably get some compensation for
10:23the time he spent sitting abroad. And
10:27if, in the meantime, another prosecutor
10:29withdraws the indictment against Mr.
10:31Romanowski from court and dismisses it,
10:33and then Mr. Romanowski gets
10:35compensation. And that, ladies and
10:40gentlemen, is how it is in the PoPis,
10:42or now KoPis state, because the Civic
10:44Platform changed its name from PO to KO
10:46; it's just that for you, if you look
10:48at someone the wrong way, you can go to
10:50jail for it, and heaven forbid if you
10:52lose your temper and yell at someone on
10:54a bus, your nerves might be shot.
11:00Ladies and gentlemen, politicians pull
11:02stunts for which a normal person would
11:04be locked up and never get out, yet
11:05they still play the victim and, dear
11:07friends, will be getting compensation
11:09in a moment. Topic number 5, extremely
11:20important, which in the context of all
11:22this has somehow completely escaped
11:24notice. Inflation has taken off. So,
11:29ladies and gentlemen, my series of
11:30materials aimed at helping you prepare
11:32for the crisis. How should I put this
11:38nicely, well, two months ago when I was
11:40starting this series, I was the only
11:42one who saw that the crisis was coming.
11:45Now, it seems to me that it can be seen
11:47with the naked eye. Uh, fuel is lacking
11:51, gas is expensive, in a moment it will
11:54be ten bucks, and the European Union is
11:56ordering us to limit demand for
11:58electricity and gas. I don't believe
12:03they will make gas, no, I don't believe
12:05they will make gas and electricity five
12:07times more expensive because it
12:08wouldn't pass before the elections.
12:11Therefore, welcome to rationing. Uh,
12:16another country, another European
12:18country is already starting to talk
12:20about fuel rationing, preparing
12:21restrictions such as, for example,
12:23maximum speed limits on roads, and that
12:25it will be implemented any moment now.
12:29You will see, it will be as usual in
12:31one country. First they test it, it
12:34passes, and then they will apply it to
12:36other countries. I will just remind you
12:40that yesterday another video from this
12:42cycle about preparing for the crisis
12:43was released. I invite you to watch it
12:48there on the cards, it will also be in
12:50the annotations at the end of this
12:51material. Topic number 6. According to
13:00new data from the Centers for Disease
13:02Control and Prevention, or CDC for
13:04short, the number of young teenagers
13:05identifying as LGBT has dropped sharply
13:08in recent years; there was a perfect
13:10correlation with this phenomenon since
13:12Trump cut off programs in United States
13:14schools considered to be promoting LGBT
13:16. So, ladies and gentlemen, it looks
13:24like hard numerical data show, after
13:26all, that LGBT is a cultural matter.
13:30Ladies and gentlemen, it fell by about
13:3630%or 40%there. That is, that is a lot,
13:39right? They cut off classes that were
13:46accused of promoting LGBT-ism, and the
13:48number of LGBT teenagers fell by about
13:5030-40%, roughly in that range, so maybe
13:52at some point it is a cultural
13:54phenomenon. Interesting, interesting. I
14:01have to ask Waldek, that
14:02thought-criminal, that thought-gatherer
14:04, for us to record a piece on this
14:05together, because it’s interesting.
14:07But for now, I’ll discuss it myself.
14:10Topic number 7. Trump offered to sell
14:13United States weaponry to China, which
14:15is curious in that both countries are
14:17preparing for armed conflict. This is a
14:20topic that dropped off the last podcast
14:22, it will be here today. And topic
14:24number eight. More and more homeless
14:25people in Germany. You can already see
14:29them in almost every big city, just
14:30lying on the street. Germans are
14:35furious because arrivals from other
14:36continents get houses and apartments
14:38for free, while Germans sleep on the
14:40streets. Interestingly, folks, it’s
14:43somewhat like that here too. Uh, after
14:47all, arrivals—well, not necessarily
14:49from other continents, rather, uh, from
14:51the same continent, but, uh, but still,
14:54uh, they get—they got a roof over
14:56their heads for absolutely nothing. And
14:59at the same time, we Poles—I mean,
15:01not everyone, but there were plenty of
15:03homeless Poles who slept on the street.
15:07It’s just that here, they weren't as
15:09visible. That is one thing. Here, they
15:12are simply incredibly visible. That is
15:17a very important point. And the second
15:21point is that well, Germans are not
15:27that used to the sight of these
15:29homeless people. There, it was always
15:33calm, always clean, tidy, and there was
15:36always prosperity. And now, for them,
15:40it’s all very strongly linked
15:42together, so to speak. All right,
15:53ladies and gentlemen, that was the
15:55teaser. Now we will move on to a
15:56comprehensive discussion of each of
15:58these topics. So, ladies and gentlemen,
16:02we will start with a case that is so
16:04incredibly inconsistent that the
16:06official version is obviously not the
16:08true one. Despite everything, no one,
16:13ladies and gentlemen, has challenged
16:15this, uh, official version, even though
16:17it’s plain to see that it’s simply
16:19impossible. Yes. Damn it, can you
16:24imagine that a man would prefer to
16:26travel in blood-stained socks and a
16:27blood-stained shirt flying, even though
16:35he has a stopover and they offer him a
16:37change of clothes so he looks better at
16:39a press conference with the Prime
16:40Minister, and this is not done just to
16:42put on a show or make a scene. Ladies
16:49and gentlemen, let me remind you, the
16:51guy even showed his bloody socks. But,
16:55ladies and gentlemen, before we get to
16:58that, let’s discuss exactly how the
17:00whole situation looks. It concerns,
17:07ladies and gentlemen, a FlyDubai flight
17:10from Dubai to Tel Aviv, which first
17:12landed safely in Saudi Arabia, and then
17:14, in Saudi Arabia, they had plenty,
17:16plenty of time to wash up, to change
17:18clothes, because they were even taken
17:20to get food. Uh, well, and then they
17:29headed on toward, uh, toward Tel Aviv,
17:31right? And then one gentleman stated
17:34that he wouldn't change clothes. But
17:35what is this about? Listen, maybe we
17:38should read the topic first and then
17:40discuss it. Listen, there was a
17:44thwarted attack on a Fly Dubai flight
17:46to Israel that has so much conflicting
17:48information and makes so little sense
17:50that if I hadn't seen the video, I
17:51wouldn't believe it. I'm wondering if
17:55this isn't a provocation by the Israeli
17:57services. You could orchestrate an
17:59Israeli intelligence provocation. Of
18:01course, almost everyone on board was
18:03Israeli. So, what's the problem with
18:07gathering over 100 Israeli agents to
18:09make up almost all the passengers on
18:11the plane? No problem at all. And the
18:16only thing we see in the video is
18:19passengers clapping. clapping because
18:22once they landed in Tel Aviv, they were
18:24cheering and happy to have arrived in
18:26Tel Aviv. That is the only thing we see
18:28in the video. Everything else we know
18:35from the media—media that reports via
18:37news agencies mostly controlled by
18:38Israel or people with Israeli passports
18:40who are friends of Netanyahu. The
18:47version. What we were told at the
18:51beginning was that a Fly Dubai flight
18:52from Dubai to Tel Aviv sent out signals
19:03SOS signals, saying it needed help. And
19:08mind you, one of those signals was that
19:12it had been hijacked. The plane
19:16suddenly descended, and then changed
19:21its flight path. And information
19:24immediately appeared in the public
19:26sphere that the plane had been hijacked
19:28. Because that would track, right? The
19:35plane suddenly drops altitude, then
19:37turns, changing direction, while
19:39simultaneously sending Mayday and SOS
19:41signals—among others, because there
19:43were several—including a message
19:45indicating a hostile takeover of the
19:46aircraft, meaning a hijacking. I mean,
19:54that's a classic aircraft hijacking,
19:56right? Then, immediately, the so-called
20:09no, the disinformation spreaders—they
20:11really are spreaders of disinformation,
20:14yet they call themselves "
20:15disinformation fighters." Yeah, because
20:19you know, we live in a world where, for
20:21example, if you founded a Virgin's
20:23Union, it would be run by a pimp cartel
20:25. So, these "disinformation fighters"
20:30claimed that anyone who said the plane
20:32was hijacked was pushing fake news.
20:36Fake news, because it wasn't...it
20:38wasn't hijacked. Look, it's flying
20:40normally toward the airport. Everything
20:42is just fine. Everything checks out.
20:45Yes. Then the news broke after reports
20:50appeared circulated by major news
20:59agencies, claiming that something did
21:01happen and that a hijacking was in
21:02progress but failed. Information
21:11appeared that one pilot had attacked
21:12another passenger. Ugh. One pilot
21:17attacked the other pilot, and once
21:19again, informational chaos. Some
21:22agencies reported that the co-pilot
21:24attacked the pilot, that is, the
21:26captain. Others, other agencies
21:30reported that the pilot, that is, the
21:32captain, attacked the co-pilot. Either
21:36way, so to speak, it’s pretty intense
21:41. Yes, one pilot attacked the other
21:44pilot. There is no information on
21:46whether the attacked pilot survived,
21:48which is also very interesting. No one
21:50is asking about the health condition of
21:51the pilot who was attacked. No one is
21:53asking about the health condition of
21:55the pilot who was the attacker, either.
21:58That’s usually a fairly important
22:00piece of information, right? If only in
22:03the context of whether they can be
22:04questioned. Yet here, that information
22:09isn't provided voluntarily. Nobody is
22:11asking about it. But it gets even
22:13stranger, ladies and gentlemen. The
22:21attack must have been very effective,
22:23if only for the reason that the man who
22:25later foiled the attempt—we’ll get
22:27to that—is covered in blood, and not
22:29only is he splattered with it, but his
22:31socks are soaked in it, despite the
22:33fact that he wasn't walking in socks,
22:34but in shoes. So what does that mean?
22:42You know, there must have been quite a
22:44few centimeters of blood there. No,
22:49seriously, shoes have rubber soles, so
22:52for the liquid to get inside, there
22:58would have to be a fairly high level of
23:00that liquid, right? I remind you, a
23:04person only has about 5 liters of blood
23:06in them, and an airplane cockpit is
23:08quite large, so that is physically
23:10impossible. By the way, you know what
23:13I'm getting at, I still remember from
23:19forensics, even though I only had two
23:22semesters of it, so I just barely
23:24scratched the surface, right? Because I
23:26was studying to be a lawyer, not a
23:28criminologist. There is such a concept
23:34as a puddle of that red stuff. Yes, I'm
23:37using slang here to avoid annoying the
23:39algorithm. There is a concept of a
23:42puddle of that red stuff, but it's
23:44usually not a deep puddle. Unless the
23:47space is very small and it slopes down,
23:49creating a basin or a bowl. That
23:52doesn't happen in a cockpit. However,
23:54there are mats in the cockpit, and it
23:56all soaks in very quickly. What am I
23:58getting at? The guy could have had his
24:01shoes in that stuff. The guy could have
24:04—the guy could, of course, have
24:06stepped in it and then tracked it
24:07around, leaving marks. Yes. M. But the
24:14fact that there was enough of that red
24:15physiological fluid, which every human
24:17has about 5 lit—we’re talking about
24:19an adult—well, physically there
24:21couldn't have been that much on the
24:22floor so that, so that he literally...
24:29That would...How much would it have to
24:31be? An inch, or like 2-3 cm, for it to
24:37be above the sole, for it to get inside
24:39? No, but really folks, this is
24:43interesting, isn't it? It really is
24:45interesting, but let's move on, ladies
24:53and gentlemen. One pilot attacked the
24:57other pilot. It looks like he succeeded
25:01, since he managed to lower the flight
25:02altitude. Let's say this drop in
25:06altitude could have been caused by a
25:08struggle, right? They were struggling
25:10in there. One fell onto the controls,
25:12the other started to dive, right? But
25:19then the plane turned, so it looks like
25:21the attacker managed to harm the first
25:23pilot, incapacitated him, and took
25:25control of the stick. Because that turn
25:31, it was so smooth, so smooth. At this
25:42moment, folks, a brave passenger steps
25:44in, just a random passenger, who
25:46managed to enter the cockpit, overpower
25:48the attacker, and then, listen to this,
25:50thanks to watching a show about
25:52airplanes, he brought the plane out,
26:08brought the plane out of that, out of
26:17that dive, even though it wasn't diving
26:19anymore, because the second pilot, who
26:21had already defeated the first one, had
26:23stabilized the flight, but he
26:24stabilized it again, and literally, in
26:26Onet it's written, listen, based on,
26:33based on an Israeli agency after a
26:35meeting with, after meeting with
26:39Netanyahu, that he, listen, prevented
26:46all of this because, watch out, he
26:48watched a show. Then, then we'll watch
26:54a series, a flight series. Do you
26:57understand? Pretty intense, right? I
27:01don't understand at all, folks, why
27:06people bother getting pilot licenses.
27:08It makes no sense. Best to just watch a
27:11flight series? Of course, I'm joking
27:14around, but I hope you get my point. No
27:17, no, no, you can't learn to fly a
27:20plane by watching a series. Otherwise,
27:24everyone would do it and there wouldn't
27:26be expensive courses. they wouldn't
27:32take expensive courses that take months
27:39or even years to complete. No, why
27:41would they? Just watch a series, right?
27:46But folks, it gets even more
27:48interesting, because you know, a guy
27:50walks in, who's like a commando, and
27:51overpowers a guy who just
27:53cold-bloodedly killed another guy. He
28:01gets his feet dirty in blood, of which
28:03there shouldn't be enough to get them
28:04dirty, because he doesn't have dirty
28:06shoes. He has dirty socks covered in
28:09blood. He specifically shows this at a
28:11press conference with Netanyahu. He
28:16overpowers him, levels out the plane,
28:18even though it was already leveled,
28:19thanks to watching a flight series. And
28:23furthermore, folks, it turns out
28:24there's a second pair of pilots on the
28:26plane. Not just one pilot, but a second
28:28pair of pilots, do you get it? A whole
28:31pair of pilots is sitting there, and
28:33again, the agencies are divided. Some
28:37agencies say that Emirates, that the
28:39Fly Dubai airline always keeps a second
28:46one in the passenger cabin, I mean, the
28:49first version. The very first version
28:54was that Fly Dubai airlines simply have
28:56backup, backup pilots in the passenger
28:58cabin. Seriously, that was the first
29:03version. I remind you that these
29:06versions are provided by mainstream
29:08media, but they are spread by agencies
29:10linked to Israel, right? Well, and so
29:14the information went out that, well,
29:16after all, there was, there was a
29:18second, there was a second pair of
29:20pilots. So that second pair of pilots
29:22took the controls and flew the plane.
29:25Where did it fly? We'll talk about that
29:26in a moment. But there was a second
29:28pair of pilots and it arrived. Well,
29:30then questions arose: where did that
29:32second pair of pilots come from? Well,
29:37because Fly Dubai is so concerned about
29:39passenger safety that there is always a
29:41second pair of pilots. The journalists
29:46started digging, like, seriously. So
29:52they changed from the "we always have a
29:54second pair of pilots" version. They
29:58switched to "a second pair of pilots
30:00just happened to be there." So, ladies
30:12and gentlemen, what an incredible
30:14stroke of luck. First, they had a
30:16Commando on board who acquired the
30:18ability to fly because he watched a TV
30:20series. Uh, then of course, by chance,
30:27uh, then by chance, uh, they had a pair
30:29of pilots on board who found themselves
30:31there by accident after it was
30:32determined that the claim that a second
30:34pair of pilots is kept in the cockpit
30:36on purpose, well, that is rather
30:43impossible. But ladies and gentlemen,
30:45what is the most interesting thing in
30:47all of this? How this Mr. Commando got
30:52into the cockpit, because in all of
30:54this, the most, the most improbable
30:56thing, ladies and gentlemen, is that
30:58Mr. Commando got into the cockpit. Why?
31:06Well, because I remind you that after
31:08September 11th, when the hijackers, who
31:10were on board among the passengers,
31:19stormed the cockpit, terrorized the
31:21pilots, then neutralized them and hit
31:23those towers on September 11th,
31:30supposedly learning to pilot planes
31:32from a computer game. Microsoft Flight
31:35Simulator, that's also good, ladies and
31:40gentlemen, also good. I will remind you
31:42that this was, whew, a quarter of a
31:46century ago. Back then, that Microsoft
31:49simulator was not as advanced as it is
31:51now. There were no VR goggles either.
31:55Flight simulators based on that game
31:57were not as developed. Because now,
32:00maybe it would even be possible,
32:01especially since they weren't planning
32:03to land, right? However, back then, I
32:13would say it was highly improbable,
32:15though still more likely than that this
32:17Israeli, who by complete coincidence is
32:19some tough commando, learned to fly
32:21from a TV series. From a computer game
32:27is still a bit more likely than from a
32:29TV series. Nevertheless, both seem to
32:32be quite highly improbable. But ladies
32:35and gentlemen, let's get back to it.
32:37After that September 11th, what was
32:39done? Well, practically armored doors
32:41to the cockpit. Well, yes. Uh, this is
32:49precisely so that no passenger enters
32:51the cockpit, overpowers the pilot, and
32:53forces them to do something terrible,
32:55or leads to the pilot being neutralized
32:57so a passenger can take the controls
32:59and, for example, crash into a tower.
33:09That’s why they made these doors
33:10practically armored, which, mind you,
33:12can only be opened from the inside.
33:24Meaning even a flight attendant or any
33:26other cabin crew member cannot open the
33:28cockpit door. So how on earth did a
33:36completely non-random Israeli who
33:37happened to be there manage to open it?
33:42Don't ask me, ladies and gentlemen,
33:43because I'll tell you it's practically
33:45impossible. No one really asked about
33:49it specifically, but reports have
33:50emerged. Although these reports don’t
33:55have any, uh, uh, uh, they don't, uh,
34:04they don't have any more official
34:09character, because, mind you,
34:11officially, no one says how on earth he
34:13got in there. I remind you, he
34:17officially had no way to physically get
34:19in there. He really had no physical
34:21possibility of getting in there. Simply
34:25put, uh, those doors are damnably
34:27barricaded. Unless, ladies and
34:35gentlemen, he just happened to have
34:37some kind of charge to burn through an
34:39armored door, but even then, most
34:45likely, even if he did, it wouldn't
34:47have worked. These doors simply have to
34:48be opened from the inside, otherwise
34:50you won't get in. I remind you that Mr.
34:53Good Guy was overpowered, and Mr. Bad
34:55Guy was sitting at the controls. So,
35:09information has appeared—unofficial,
35:11of course—that as a result of a
35:12scuffle, a situation must have occurred
35:14where those doors were opened. Well,
35:22that becomes a problem, ladies and
35:23gentlemen, because they specifically
35:25designed the door opening mechanism so
35:27it couldn't be opened that easily by
35:29accident. There were safety measures in
35:34place. I remember, because I discussed
35:36this topic quite thoroughly in one of
35:41my podcasts a few years ago. Generally,
35:44it's about the issue of what happens if
35:46a pilot has a heart attack? Or a stroke
35:50, or for some other reason becomes
35:52unable to work. Well, then no one can
35:57get into the cockpit. Yes. I remember
36:00how I was brought back down to earth.
36:02There is still a co-pilot, after all.
36:05And what happens if the co-pilot is in
36:07the restroom when the first one has a
36:09heart attack? Well, then everyone dies.
36:12And then I was told to shut up. Uh, so
36:16I realized quite clearly that the
36:18problem exists. It is very serious.
36:24Because if you get such a crude answer
36:25meant to discredit you because you
36:27asked an uncomfortable question, that
36:29means you asked a very good question
36:30that the other side simply He doesn't
36:36have the answer, or doesn't want to
36:38answer, because the correct answer
36:39simply doesn't exist, no. So that can't
36:44be opened that easily either. And now,
36:48someone might say that maybe, you know,
36:50with a dying hand, the defeated pilot
36:52Dobrol reached out and opened it. Well
37:00yes, but I remind you that pilot Zall
37:01managed to sit at the controls and
37:03change the plane's flight path. So, do
37:11you believe that even if pilot Dobrol,
37:14in his final reflex, opened that door,
37:21pilot Zall wouldn't have closed it back
37:23up? Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I think
37:37that's basically it no way in hell. Oh
37:54regarding this whole situation, whether
37:56we are dealing with, or rather, there
37:58is some unresolved information that
38:00seems to be, well, completely
38:11completely impossible to, uh,
38:12completely impossible to have happened,
38:14that the guy got in there. Then, ladies
38:23and gentlemen, what happens, then
38:25ladies and gentlemen, when people
38:27started asking too many questions about
38:29that pilot, how on earth he opened that
38:31door, when the door, you know, it
38:33doesn't just swing wide open, the lock
38:35just releases. Uh, and also, the lock
38:41is right there by the door. Just by the
38:45way, so that downed pilot, that downed
38:50pilot Dobrol would have had to get up
38:52and walk to the door. Which is
38:55completely impossible. As this
38:58situation came up a bit more, suddenly
39:00a classic appeared. A classic, meaning
39:04a change of subject. Information
39:06appeared that one of the pilots was
39:07Russian, and the other Ukrainian. And
39:10that the Ukrainian killed the Russian.
39:16So, ladies and gentlemen, once the
39:17information was provided that we were
39:19dealing with a situation where one man
39:21was Ukrainian, and the other, the
39:23attacker was Ukrainian, and the man
39:25defending himself, who was killed, was
39:27Russian. Well, ladies and gentlemen,
39:33only then did the campaign start, right
39:35? And it started so very, very strongly
39:38that, here you go, this is what's
39:39happening. Look here at what, what kind
39:41of things are happening. God, how, how
39:43can you do that and everything. Yeah,
39:45well, that's obvious, right? And this
39:57discussion completely covered up, uh,
39:59covered up the whole discussion about
40:01how the hell the man who defeated that,
40:02uh, defeated that attacker after
40:04entering the cockpit, how the hell did
40:06he get into that cockpit? Like this
40:16discussion completely this discussion
40:20completely died down. And when this
40:23discussion completely died down, the
40:25information that the attacker was
40:26Ukrainian was debunked, and it turned
40:28out he was Omani. So, a completely, a
40:38completely, like there, well, an
40:42interesting situation, right? Uh,
40:45however, as for the nationality of the
40:47attacked pilot, pilot Dobrol, that was
40:49no longer brought up. So, as I am
40:52recording this, he is still a Russian,
40:54but you aren't allowed to say that a
40:56Russian gave his life and so on,
40:58because, let me remind you, they don't
41:00allow it. Yes, although currently the
41:02bad guy is an Omani. And the topic
41:06isn't being explored. Next, ladies and
41:12gentlemen, as if by some magic miracle,
41:14perhaps through teleportation or using
41:16a spell to pass through doors, this
41:18Israeli commando in plain clothes
41:19entered the cockpit, where the pilot
41:21Dobrol was already lying, bled out, and
41:23several times over, because there must
41:25have been so much gore that he even got
41:27his socks stained. Let me remind you
41:33that he was wearing shoes, and shoes
41:35with rubber soles at that. He
41:38incapacitated the pilot from Walla, who
41:42was a Ukrainian at first, then became
41:44an Omani. Thanks to the fact that he
41:50watched a TV series, he knew how to fly
41:52, so he brought the plane back on the
41:54right course. He opened the door. It
42:02turned out that there was a completely
42:04different pair of pilots on the plane,
42:06first routinely, then accidentally, and
42:08they, pay attention, didn't continue
42:10the flight to Tel Aviv, but landed in
42:12Saudi Arabia instead. In Saudi Arabia,
42:20they had plenty of time to get medical
42:22help, psychological help, and to be
42:23cared for with a meal. But as you can
42:31see for yourselves from the article in
42:33The Telegraph, for instance, which Onet
42:35cites, the Israeli commando. The
42:49Israeli commando didn't have time to
42:51change, all so that as soon as he
42:53reached Tel Aviv, in Israel, he held a
42:55joint press conference with Mr.
42:56Netanyahu, who really needed such a
42:58joint press conference, where he
43:00presented blood-stained pants he hadn't
43:02changed and a blood-stained shirt he
43:03hadn't changed. And pay attention, he
43:14took off his shoes to show that he had
43:16blood-stained socks. And these, ladies
43:22and gentlemen, are still on the X
43:24profile of the Prime Minister of Israel
43:26. And these photos are also, I cite,
43:30shown by Onet, ladies and gentlemen. I
43:35won't show them because YouTube's
43:36guidelines don't really like the sight
43:38of blood, but I'll post them on my
43:40Facebook profile soon because they are,
43:42so to speak, open-source. I mean, not
43:46open source, in any case, there is
43:48permission to use them. There is
43:50permission to use them, which is also
43:52very interesting, right? An Israeli is
43:54giving them out for free, so you can
43:56see he cares about them spreading. So,
43:58ladies and gentlemen, an incredible
44:00story. And all in the context that
44:04literally two days ago they wanted to
44:06remove Netanyahu in Israel, because it
44:08came out that he was informed by many
44:10different services, including Israel's
44:12internal services, about what the
44:14Palestinians were planning in 2023,
44:16specifically Hamas. And he allowed
44:24Hamas to act, thereby allowing Hamas to
44:26finish off a large number of Israelis.
44:33That's it. So, it’s not true that the
44:36services failed. It’s not true that
44:38Netanyahu didn’t know. Netanyahu knew
44:40perfectly well what was coming. And now
44:42the question is, did Netanyahu know?
44:44Well exactly, if Netanyahu knew, then
44:46why didn't Netanyahu prevent it? And a
44:49quite logical option is that, if
44:51Netanyahu knew and didn't prevent it,
44:53it means he wanted Hamas to carry out
44:55this this attack. This means he could
45:00have prevented the deaths of over a
45:06thousand Israelis, but didn't so he
45:07would have a pretext to pacify the Gaza
45:09Strip and murder Palestinians, which
45:11makes him a turbo-criminal. A
45:15turbo-criminal. And the Israelis
45:18themselves were very angry, they wanted
45:20to dismiss him and wanted him to be put
45:22on trial. But now they don't want to
45:26anymore, because now there was an
45:28attack on a plane. So I’ll be honest,
45:39it’s so poorly stitched together that
45:41it really surprises me that no one saw
45:43through it before me. I can only wonder
45:51why. Let's read an article on Onet that
45:55is reprinted from The Telegraph. The
46:00author didn't sign it, or did they? No.
46:02The author didn't sign it. A Fly Dubai
46:06passenger, a Fly Dubai passenger told
46:08how he overpowered the attacker and
46:10took control of the plane. I watched
46:14the show. Oh, excuse me, it says here
46:18it's a team of journalists. Jotan
46:23Confino, Aleksandra Snow, and Lilia
46:25Seboui. It doesn't say who did the
46:30translation. One of the passengers of
46:36the hijacked plane flying to Israel
46:37described how he pulled the attacker
46:39out of the cockpit and took control of
46:41the machine, thus preventing a
46:43potential 9/11-style attack. The man,
46:49wearing a blood-stained shirt, was
46:51hugged by Netanyahu after landing in
47:00Tel Aviv—I think just, yes, hugged
47:02like a bear, yes, like that in Russian
47:04—just after the attack, which took
47:06place over Saudi Arabian airspace. "You
47:10are a hero, you deserve a world medal
47:12of honor," the Israeli prime minister
47:14told him. In my opinion, he rather
47:16deserves an agent of the year or spy of
47:18the year award. Uh, the Fly Dubai plane
47:25flying from Dubai to Tel Aviv dove
47:27sharply on Wednesday morning when the
47:29co-pilot attacked the pilot with a
47:30knife and tried to disable the
47:32machine's control systems. I wonder
47:37where he even brought that blade in,
47:39right? Maybe it's time to finally start
47:41checking pilots and flight attendants
47:43too. Israeli security services told The
47:48Telegraph that the suspicious hijacking
47:49could have been an attempt to crash the
47:51plane into an Israeli city. Yes.
47:56Because he wanted to crash this plane
47:57into an Israeli city, he turned away so
47:59as not to fly to Israel. That's
48:02definitely how it was. A man who, well,
48:09it's like if someone wanted to meet me
48:11and so they hijacked a bus, say, going
48:13from Lodz to Warsaw just to meet me in
48:15Warsaw, and then they turned the plane,
48:17I mean that bus, towards Gdansk, but
48:19all to meet me in Warsaw. He flew to
48:25Gdansk, drove to Gdansk, just to meet
48:27me in Warsaw. He turned, uh, back
48:31towards Dubai. Or he turned towards
48:35Dubai, but only to crash the plane
48:37somewhere in Israel. Yeah, that's how
48:39it was. I'm not making this up. You
48:40have to believe the Israelis. How could
48:43you not believe the Israelis? Hey, hey,
48:45how can you do that? Israeli security
48:48services told The Telegraph that the
48:50suspected hijacking could have been an
48:52attempt to crash the plane into an
48:54Israeli city. It could just as well
48:56have been an attempt. Of course, the
48:58sentence "it could have been" is always
49:00true, because everything could have
49:01been, dear friends. It could just as
49:06well have been an attempt to land the
49:08plane in the desert to sell it to
49:09Bedouins for scrap, because scrap metal
49:11prices are good right now. Granted,
49:17it's totally absurd, but it could have
49:19been. The man who overpowered the
49:24co-pilot, identified as Yaniv, reported
49:27, reported. When I entered the cockpit,
49:34I saw the terrorist at the controls. Uh
49:37, between the two seats, in the pilot's
49:39seat, there was, uh, no one. That’s
49:42quite important, because how he got in
49:43there is being completely overlooked.
49:46He grabbed the terrorist, I grabbed the
49:48terrorist, overpowered him, and above
49:50all, I dragged him outside. Yaniv said
49:55he called on other passengers to help
49:57subdue the alleged attacker, after
49:58which he returned to the cockpit
50:00himself to stabilize the flight. I
50:05jumped back in, grabbed the controls,
50:07and started pulling them. He added,
50:11admitting he knew what to do because he
50:13watched the air disaster series Mayday.
50:18Seriously, he claims he learned how to
50:20fly a plane from the air disaster
50:22series Mayday and everyone just bought
50:24it. Later, another pilot took over the
50:36controls. Is that so? Look, another
50:38pilot. This suggests that he was a
50:40pilot after all. Well, since it was "
50:42another" pilot, that one was a pilot
50:44too. and diverted the plane to Saudi
50:46Arabia. Israel is conducting an
50:49investigation. Netanyahu informed that
50:51the co-pilot has been detained and is
50:52being interrogated. It is suspected
50:56that the attacker is from Oman. Israel
50:59is investigating the matter. How could
51:06he get clearance to operate a flight to
51:08Tel Aviv, considering the lack of
51:09diplomatic relations between Oman and
51:11Israel and the strict Israeli controls
51:13on foreign crews entering Israeli
51:15airspace. How could he? Well, dear
51:21friends, it's getting interesting. Yeah
51:24. And the best part is, dear friends,
51:27the bloody, uh, uh, bloody socks, if I
51:33may put it that way. You should try an
51:37experiment sometime, ladies and
51:39gentlemen. Pour a little water in the
51:42bathroom. Pour out, I don't know, just
51:45pour it out, folks. Even pour out five
51:48liters of water in the bathroom, folks.
51:50I remind you, five liters is as much
51:52blood as a human has inside. And I
51:54don't believe that a person could lose
51:56absolutely all of it. Yes. Distribute
51:59five liters of water, it's not that
52:01much. Well, this mug holds 850 ml, or
52:05maybe 890. So, even six of these mugs.
52:09And step in there wearing shoes, as
52:11they nicely put it, Adidas-class. Uh,
52:15you will see, ladies and gentlemen. Uh,
52:18you will see, ladies and gentlemen, how
52:20much uh, you will see, ladies and
52:24gentlemen, how much of that uh, how
52:28much uh, you will see how much of it,
52:34God, how much whether or not you will
52:41soak your socks. Probably not. It
52:43usually, ladies and gentlemen, sort of
52:45ends at the soles. So, I'll put it this
52:49way. I am convinced that they framed
52:52the guy, and just so there's no doubt.
52:55I am not claiming that this plane
52:56wasn't hijacked. I am not claiming that
52:59the guy didn't overpower the pilot. I
53:01am not questioning any findings. I'm
53:03only asking, how on earth did he have
53:05bloodied socks? Because for that to
53:12happen, the cockpit would literally
53:14have to be swimming in red
53:15physiological fluid, of which every
53:17person has five of those 5 liters
53:19inside them. Second thing, how on earth
53:24did he get into the cockpit and how on
53:30earth did no journalist ask how he
53:32learned to fly a plane from a TV show
53:34about plane crashes. Mayday. Alright,
53:42ladies and gentlemen, topic number 2.
53:50Topic number 2. It has become certain.
53:54The troops have moved. They have moved,
53:58ladies and gentlemen, out of Iraq. I'm
54:01talking about American troops. American
54:04troops have moved from Iraq towards
54:06Jordan, Syria, and the United States.
54:11To put it very colloquially, after
54:13about 23 years, the United States is
54:18ending, I would say a war, but to end a
54:23war you first have to start one.
54:26Officially, it wasn't a war, but a
54:28special military operation—I remind
54:30you—in which we, the Poles,
54:32unfortunately also took part; we were
54:34dragged into it too. Under what
54:36pretenses? I will remind you after 23
54:39years. Well, the Americans are fleeing,
54:41yes, the Americans are fleeing from
54:43Iraq. They didn't manage to find
54:48weapons of mass destruction in these 23
54:50years, but they did steal Iraqi gold
54:52and got their hands on Iraqi oil. I'll
54:59tell you how in a moment, because I
55:01overheard it from Mr. Szewko, whom I
55:02greet very warmly. I acknowledge that
55:05since he says so, it must have been
55:06that way. The rest of the information,
55:08ladies and gentlemen, is sort of my own
55:10. Ladies and gentlemen, the Americans
55:17have cleared out of Iraq. They didn't
55:21clear out like they did from
55:22Afghanistan, meaning not in a panic.
55:24They didn’t leave a ton of equipment,
55:26but rather, let’s say, in a peaceful
55:30and agreed-upon manner. The troops just
55:32moved out. What does this mean? It
55:36means that Iraq will likely be taken
55:38over by Iran very quickly.
55:41Theoretically, Iraq has its own
55:42government, theoretically democratic,
55:44it even has a prime minister. The only
55:49thing is, believing that this prime
55:50minister will hold on after the
55:52Americans have left, well, ladies and
55:54gentlemen, that’s like believing that
55:59I don’t know, that Trump will end the
56:05armed conflict in Ukraine within 24
56:07hours of taking office. Well, obviously
56:11he won’t end it, because the time has
56:13passed and that was well over a year
56:15ago, right? So here it’s clear, well,
56:17it’s clear it won’t work out,
56:19ladies and gentlemen. And it won’t
56:21work out, um, very significantly. Iran,
56:26Iraq, excuse me, Iraq is already being
56:29infiltrated by, um, Iranian militants,
56:31militias. It sounds like that,
56:35militants, militias. It doesn’t sound
56:40threatening. But ladies and gentlemen,
56:43when such a militant group, or if a
56:45group has 200,000 soldiers, which is
56:47roughly around what the Polish army has
56:49, then that sounds more serious, right?
56:54And if a militia has, for example, half
56:57a million soldiers, that is 2.5 times
56:59what the Polish army has, then that
57:01sounds like a force capable of taking
57:03over a given country, right? And it is
57:08certainly capable of destabilizing it
57:10enough to topple the prime minister and
57:16take power. So this is a matter that is
57:23in my opinion, quite evident and, in my
57:25opinion, quite evident and fairly
57:27beyond, like, like debate, right? Iran
57:35is financing these organizations. These
57:38organizations are very well armed,
57:40including American equipment that they
57:42have, as it’s nicely put, acquired
57:44over the years. Therefore, the matter
57:47of taking over, actually taking over,
57:54actually taking control by Iran over
57:59Iraq. I keep pausing because, as a
58:01dyslexic, I don’t want to mess up, I
58:02don’t want to have a slip of the
58:04tongue. Such things happen to me,
58:06unfortunately. So, such a takeover,
58:10such a situation where Iran will hold
58:13actual control over Iraq. Well, that is
58:20a matter of months, at most quarters,
58:21because even if they don't topple the
58:23prime minister, they can topple him at
58:25any moment. Therefore, this prime
58:33minister will have to reckon with them
58:34and will have to do what they want. So,
58:45it is a total defeat for the United
58:47States. A total defeat for the United
58:53States. a complete indication that they
58:58are withdrawing more and more. Why are
59:01they running away? For two reasons.
59:07First of all, the midterms are coming
59:09up soon in the United States, because
59:11their parliament doesn't work like ours
59:13where the whole composition changes at
59:15once; instead, they replace part of the
59:17composition, and then they replace the
59:19other part later. I'm purposefully not
59:24saying half, because it's not exactly
59:25split down the middle. It is a part,
59:28yes, but those parts are close to half,
59:31though not exactly a half. Why do they
59:34do it that way? To ensure greater
59:36continuity of power, so it isn't as
59:37chaotic as it is for us, so that it is
59:39more continuous. Is it better or worse?
59:44It is different. It certainly has its
59:46pros, and it certainly has its cons.
59:48Certainly, all the cliques and shady
59:50deals have an easier time surviving
59:52this way, but on the other hand, there
59:54is no chaos. And do we not have cliques
59:57and shady deals here? We have them like
59:59hell. So, there isn't that chaos where
1:00:02one side cuts out the other right after
1:00:04the elections and we start everything
1:00:05from scratch, right? So it is
1:00:10definitely a matter that has its
1:00:11downsides, even though we have those
1:00:13downsides too, and it has its upsides;
1:00:15that's how I would put it nicely. Yes.
1:00:21And it's well known that Trump's
1:00:22electorate, that is the Republican
1:00:24electorate, doesn't like wars. After
1:00:28all, Trump came to power by promising
1:00:30to end armed conflicts and not drag the
1:00:32United States into any new ones. Then
1:00:36he dragged the United States into a
1:00:37conflict with Venezuela, but that one
1:00:39was short. That one was short and, de
1:00:42facto, ended with the colonization of
1:00:44Venezuela. Currently, there is
1:00:49effectively a puppet government in
1:00:50Venezuela that does what the Americans
1:00:52tell it to, and the Americans control
1:00:54the oil trade and make money off it. So
1:00:58here, the Americans are probably, they
1:01:00are probably satisfied, because they
1:01:04made quite a lot of money on it. So
1:01:06they are likely in favor of this one.
1:01:10Um, however, the conflict in Iran, well
1:01:12, regardless of what was said, it was
1:01:14supposed to be a special military
1:01:16operation lasting two or three weeks.
1:01:21In a moment, it will be in its eighth
1:01:23month, ladies and gentlemen. No, it is
1:01:25already in its eighth month, because
1:01:28they started on February 28th, so March
1:01:30, April, May, June, July, August,
1:01:32September, and today, ladies and
1:01:35gentlemen, is October 1st, so it has
1:01:37been going on for eight months. It just
1:01:40can't seem to end. And Trump is now
1:01:43fighting for something that wasn't a
1:01:45problem before this conflict started,
1:01:47namely the throughput of the Strait of
1:01:52Hormuz. Let me remind you that before
1:01:54this conflict, everyone was sailing
1:01:55through there however they pleased. And
1:02:00now they have to do things like
1:02:01smuggling oil tankers and transferring
1:02:03oil outside the reach of the zones. Of
1:02:10missiles, Iranian missiles and drones.
1:02:12I apologize for the expression, but
1:02:14it's pure madness. Yes, so the guy set
1:02:18the region on fire and now he's trying
1:02:20to put out at least one part, and
1:02:21nobody even talks about Iran's
1:02:23denuclearization anymore. Well, which
1:02:27suggests there was never anything there
1:02:29to denuclearize. Because let me remind
1:02:32you, they told us Iran needed two weeks
1:02:34to build a nuclear warhead. Well, if
1:02:39they needed two weeks, then in over
1:02:41half a year they should have succeeded,
1:02:43right? So they were likely lying. They
1:02:45were likely lying. And Trump needs a
1:02:51success like air, so he at least ended
1:02:53that war in Iraq. It is important to
1:02:59say here that Trump announced this as a
1:03:01success. What a shitty success. It's a
1:03:03failure. He is running away with his
1:03:05tail between his legs. Where is the
1:03:06success in that? He reminded everyone
1:03:09who started that war. He reminded them
1:03:13that this war lasted during the time of
1:03:15Hussein Obama, Barack Hussein Obama. He
1:03:17always mentions his middle name, right?
1:03:19Because Hussein, the leader of Iraq had
1:03:21the same name. So you know, Trump is
1:03:24alluding to that famous conspiracy
1:03:26theory that Obama is a Muslim. Although
1:03:31it is one of the stupider conspiracy
1:03:33theories and is almost certainly untrue
1:03:35. Obama has a lot on his conscience and
1:03:39there are a lot of conspiracy theories
1:03:41surrounding him that are almost
1:03:42certainly true. But this one is just
1:03:45stupid and untrue. Maybe that’s why
1:03:47it resonates so well with Mr. Trump's
1:03:49voters. So yes, he reminded everyone
1:03:52during whose time it started and during
1:03:54whose time it continued. He only left
1:03:56out one United States president. During
1:03:59whose time it continued? Himself.
1:04:10Because let’s recall that if this
1:04:12conflict started in 2003 and ended now,
1:04:14it lasted during Trump’s first term,
1:04:16right? And somehow Trump forgot to
1:04:20mention himself. So the first, the
1:04:23first reason is so that Trump could
1:04:24claim a success. That, that is
1:04:28undoubtedly true. And the second issue
1:04:34is that those Iranian-backed militias
1:04:36were already getting strong enough that
1:04:45well, the Americans had to get out of
1:04:47there, because if they hadn't, then
1:04:53these militias, these paramilitary
1:04:55groups, are counting on it. Oh yes,
1:04:58that's softer. Better. These
1:05:05paramilitary groups, numbering hundreds
1:05:07of thousands of fighters plus their
1:05:09support, were attacking American bases
1:05:11in the region more and more sharply and
1:05:12brazenly. Consequently, while they
1:05:22didn't have an air force or heavy
1:05:23artillery, we live in times where you
1:05:25can fire a mortar 20 km away, and if
1:05:27you have a good assisted mortar grenade
1:05:29, even further. So the question is, do
1:05:34you need heavy artillery, if with light
1:05:36portable artillery you can fire as From
1:05:45Otwock to the Sejm of the Republic of
1:05:47Poland, that's an example, you know,
1:05:49Otwock is a totally different city. You
1:05:53can just drop one right in the center
1:05:54of Warsaw. No, well, it's those bases
1:05:59were rather a bit defenseless, weren't
1:06:01they? not to mention drones, because
1:06:03they’d already had drones there for a
1:06:05long time. What's very interesting,
1:06:09they also looked like, how should I put
1:06:11this nicely, it sort of, ladies and
1:06:21gentlemen, looked like, I don't know
1:06:23how to put it, like someone, like
1:06:34someone, ladies and gentlemen, was
1:06:36making it under someone else's license.
1:06:39Well, it looked a bit like like someone
1:06:49, I don't know how to phrase it, like
1:06:51someone was doing a bit too much
1:06:53messing around there, ladies and
1:06:54gentlemen. So, it looked quite, I would
1:06:59say, quite quite quite quite very
1:07:01interesting. Um, well, and they just
1:07:05had to clear out of there, because if
1:07:06they hadn't cleared out, they would've
1:07:08gotten their butts kicked, that's all.
1:07:10And it shows how weak the Americans are
1:07:12. And I remind you, our security is
1:07:16still being based on the Americans.
1:07:23Americans who are weak, Americans who,
1:07:26as the Persian Gulf War shows,
1:07:27currently pose more of a danger to
1:07:29their allies than they provide security
1:07:31. That’s how I’d put it, I’d put
1:07:38it mildly. I remind you, the war
1:07:45between Israel and the United States
1:07:46brought Iranian attacks on all those
1:07:48countries in the region that had
1:07:50American bases. The Americans were
1:07:55supposed to protect countries like the
1:07:57United Arab Emirates, and instead of
1:07:59protecting them, they brought danger
1:08:01upon them. Just on that note, right,
1:08:04that we base our security on the United
1:08:06States. I think we should base it on
1:08:08ourselves. Um, the second interesting
1:08:11thing, um, hmm, um, the second, um,
1:08:21interesting thing, seems very, very
1:08:23important to me, it's the issue related
1:08:25to–I don't know how to put it–um,
1:08:27the weakness, the reluctance to support
1:08:29their their their these um their um
1:08:39their partners, that's probably how I'd
1:08:45put it, those who paid them. Um, well,
1:08:51and the last thing, um, well, hypocrisy
1:08:53, because in the meantime it turned out
1:08:55, I cited a source earlier, that, well,
1:08:57and boom, another conspiracy theory has
1:09:00just become a fact, because let me
1:09:02remind you: back in 2003 there was a
1:09:04conspiracy theory that the Americans
1:09:06weren't going there to protect Europe
1:09:08at all, but were going there for the
1:09:10oil. Well, damn, it turned out to be
1:09:15true. The fact that Hussein didn't have
1:09:27weapons of mass destruction is a pretty
1:09:28obvious issue. For 23 years, the
1:09:32Americans, who controlled that country,
1:09:35didn't even bother to plant them, so
1:09:37that issue, well, seems completely
1:09:39obvious to me. However, now it turns
1:09:44out that there is also the issue that
1:09:46they were simply going there for the
1:09:48oil. I remind you, on one hand we were
1:09:52told they weren't going there for oil
1:09:54at all, not for oil, but on the other
1:09:56hand we were promised that we would
1:09:57earn money from this war because we
1:09:59would have control over oil fields. Us
1:10:02Poles, right? So, we aren't going there
1:10:04for oil, but you will make money on oil
1:10:06, right? It’s a bit like, uh, it’s
1:10:10a bit like saying you enter a bank with
1:10:12a weapon, not for the money, but you
1:10:13will have a share of the money we steal
1:10:15. No, honestly, to call this hypocrisy,
1:10:20ladies and gentlemen, I think that,
1:10:24that's saying nothing at all, right? It
1:10:27seems really, really heavy. It turns
1:10:34out, ladies and gentlemen, that Iraq
1:10:35trades its oil in such a way that the
1:10:37money from this oil goes to an account
1:10:39in the United States and from that
1:10:41account in the United States then, as
1:10:43it was nicely put, are settled the
1:10:50needs of Iran. So it's a bit like, I
1:10:55don't know, a trust fund or something
1:10:57like that. Money from the sale of
1:11:00Iraq's oil. If I said Iran somewhere,
1:11:03it was a slip of the tongue. Money from
1:11:14the sale of oil goes to an account in
1:11:16the United States and Iraq's
1:11:17obligations are settled there, meaning
1:11:19the United States has its hand on Iraqi
1:11:21money. I don't believe they aren't
1:11:27taking a commission for this. I don't
1:11:29believe it. And at any moment I am
1:11:32convinced they can say about a payment:
1:11:34"We won't process this. We won't
1:11:37process this either. It has to be this
1:11:40here, it has to be this there." So, so
1:11:44that's about it. Really heavy, in my
1:11:52opinion, very, very, very heavy. So
1:11:58that's it. The United States is pulling
1:12:00back. They are preparing for a very
1:12:03large armed conflict and that is very
1:12:06visible. Yes, in my opinion, they are
1:12:11preparing on the principle that they
1:12:13will try to wage a resource war against
1:12:15the Chinese, meaning they want to
1:12:16control as large a part of the oil
1:12:18fields as possible, because without oil
1:12:20currently, you cannot wage war. Well,
1:12:26after all, planes run on, fly on
1:12:28aviation fuel, which is made from oil.
1:12:33Tanks run on diesel fuel, which is made
1:12:35from oil. If the Americans control
1:12:39almost all oil deposits, then simply
1:12:50the Chinese won't be able to defend
1:12:52themselves. Yes, as much as they have
1:12:54in reserves, that's how much they will
1:12:56be able to fight, and then no more. And
1:12:59in my opinion, that's the direction
1:13:01it's heading. Alright, ladies and
1:13:03gentlemen, next topic. And the next
1:13:05topic is that Wyborcza decided that the
1:13:07sign "F***UPA" is anti-Ukrainian. And
1:13:15basically, this is yet another maneuver
1:13:17of this kind, aimed at telling us Poles
1:13:19that we aren't allowed to dislike the
1:13:21UPA, aren't allowed to oppose the UPA,
1:13:22and that we must accept the UPA,
1:13:24because that's where this is heading.
1:13:31Remember, some time ago there was the
1:13:33issue with the monument honoring the
1:13:40fallen UPA members, right? Someone on
1:13:46Polish soil in 2019 illegally erected a
1:13:48monument in their honor. Excuse me, in
1:13:57the 90s, back in the 90s, and in 2019
1:13:59they expanded it. Well, someone
1:14:04spray-painted that monument, and the
1:14:06Polish police stated they were
1:14:08conducting an investigation into the
1:14:09desecration of a monument based on
1:14:11national identity. This is the same
1:14:16monument that Mr. Braun later smashed
1:14:18with a hammer. Which is interesting
1:14:23because nobody has filed any charges
1:14:25against Mr. Braun for it, so it looks
1:14:27like a purely political issue. Because
1:14:31they wanted to drag an ordinary Pole to
1:14:33court and hurt him for using spray
1:14:34paint. Mr. Braun, they don't file
1:14:37charges against Mr. Braun. In my
1:14:39opinion, for a very simple reason: they
1:14:41know perfectly well that the majority
1:14:42of society thinks Mr. Braun did the
1:14:44right thing. God forbid, I am not
1:14:46condoning it. God forbid, I am not
1:14:47condoning it. I don't want to end up
1:14:49like Ms. Najka. By the way, I did an
1:14:50interview with Ms. Naja. Very
1:14:52interesting. I'll be releasing it soon,
1:14:54maybe even today at 2:00 PM. And, and,
1:15:01and they know that if they charged Mr.
1:15:03Braun for it, he would gain support
1:15:05from it, and quite a lot too, right? So
1:15:19, I really don't like this. Equating
1:15:25Ukrainians with the UPA is dishonest,
1:15:27unfair, wrong, and harmful to both us
1:15:29Poles and the Ukrainians. Let's start
1:15:35with the Ukrainians. If we acknowledge
1:15:40that a sign calling for anal sex with
1:15:42the UPA is anti-Ukrainian and insults
1:15:49Ukrainians, that means we accept that
1:15:51every Ukrainian is a Banderite. Well,
1:15:55that is not true. And it's a truth that
1:15:58hurts Ukrainians, and in my opinion,
1:16:00hurts them very deeply. Uh, and given
1:16:04that most of us Poles categorically do
1:16:06not accept the UPA—categorically—if
1:16:09we, as Poles, believe that every
1:16:11Ukrainian is a Banderite, we will be
1:16:13hostile toward every Ukrainian. So it
1:16:16is simply unfair to those people.
1:16:20Gazeta Wyborcza is behaving in an
1:16:22extremely vile way at this moment. But
1:16:26there is also a second issue, namely
1:16:28the vileness toward us Poles, which,
1:16:30because of my nationality, interests me
1:16:32much more, of course. This is an
1:16:37attempt to force us Poles to accept the
1:16:46UPA, so that we sort of get used to the
1:16:48fact that, well, the UPA exists and we
1:16:50have to accept them. Furthermore, it is
1:16:56an attempt to teach us that any
1:16:58opposition to the UPA will be treated
1:17:00like opposition to Ukrainians and will
1:17:02be punished as a nationality-based hate
1:17:03crime, meaning several years in prison.
1:17:08It is simply disgusting. And then
1:17:15Gazeta Wyborcza wonders why their reach
1:17:17is dropping so drastically that they
1:17:19have to lay people off. Because well,
1:17:27due to falling sales, they have less
1:17:29and less reach in print, right? And due
1:17:33to the shrinking reach online, they
1:17:35have less and less advertising revenue.
1:17:37And this is very important. Well, Tusk
1:17:39has been governing for almost three
1:17:41years now. One could have pretended
1:17:45that Wyborcza's financial problems were
1:17:51a PiS issue. And that PiS doesn't like
1:17:53Wyborcza. PiS trash-talks Wyborcza, I
1:17:55mean Agora, their publisher. Yes, but
1:17:58PiS doesn't like Wyborcza, so they are
1:18:00trashing Agora, their publisher, just
1:18:02so that they collapse. Well, I’d like
1:18:05to remind you that Tusk has been ruling
1:18:07for 3 years, and Gazeta Wyborcza is
1:18:09still failing, so it is definitely not
1:18:11PiS's fault. It is definitely
1:18:15Wyborcza's fault and Wyborcza has to
1:18:21just deal with it, damn it. So people
1:18:24don't read them, because they because
1:18:30they don't like them. And why don't
1:18:31they like them? Well, among other
1:18:34things, for such things. It's hard to
1:18:36like someone who creates such
1:18:38disgusting content. Let's move on to
1:18:41the next topic. And the next topic is
1:18:54Marcin Romanowski received a letter of
1:18:56safe conduct. He cannot be arrested or
1:18:59temporarily detained. We will see how
1:19:06the appeal goes, because this was
1:19:08decided by a court, and the court's
1:19:09decision is subject to a complaint to a
1:19:11higher instance. To a higher instance.
1:19:20And the higher instance may overturn
1:19:22the lower court's decision. However,
1:19:25two things are interesting. The first
1:19:27thing, how much the Tuskists panicked,
1:19:35and it seems that if they had good
1:19:36intentions, they shouldn't have
1:19:38panicked politically. And the second
1:19:44thing, well, this is what I already
1:19:46hinted at a bit, namely how terribly
1:19:48this reflects on our justice system,
1:19:50because you'll see that Romanowski will
1:19:51come here to Poland now. And he will
1:19:57play the role of a great victim
1:19:59persecuted by Tusk. Not a single hair
1:20:02will fall from his head, even if he is
1:20:04convicted. Considering how Tusk and
1:20:09Żurek reacted, with almost hysteria, I
1:20:11dare say he might not even be convicted
1:20:13, even though in my opinion he is
1:20:15guilty as hell, but that is my private
1:20:17opinion. A person is innocent until
1:20:21proven guilty before a fair,
1:20:23independent court. And that must be
1:20:26final and binding. So he might not be
1:20:30convicted at all. What is it roughly
1:20:32about? Well, Mr. Romanowski I'll check,
1:20:37because I keep getting him mixed up
1:20:38with Rymanowski. One is a journalist,
1:20:40the other is Romanowski. Marcin
1:20:42Romanowski. Mr. Marcin Romanowski, well
1:20:48According to the media, according to
1:20:50media allegations, and according to
1:20:52what the prosecutor's office claims, he
1:20:54is involved in many scandals, including
1:20:56those—dear viewers—related to the
1:20:58Justice Fund, which was supposed to be
1:21:00money for crime victims, but was—
1:21:02according to media reports, let’s
1:21:04emphasize, because no one has proven
1:21:06anything to anyone yet, because the "
1:21:07Tuskists" are struggling so much with
1:21:09it that nothing is coming of it. It was
1:21:14basically a private piggy bank for
1:21:16Ziobro’s people, right? So what
1:21:19happens now? Well, now Mr. Romanowski:
1:21:24if the second instance court decides
1:21:26that the safe conduct letter is indeed
1:21:28a good idea—since the prosecution
1:21:30immediately filed an appeal and went
1:21:32into a frenzy—then if the court
1:21:34agrees, Mr. Romanowski will come to
1:21:36Poland, be formally charged, and his
1:21:38trial will begin. His trial will begin,
1:21:48except he will be defending himself
1:21:50from a position of freedom. He cannot
1:21:52be placed under temporary arrest or
1:21:54detained. Why is this so bad for the "
1:21:58Tuskists"? If the "Tuskists," as they
1:22:04claim, have such strong evidence
1:22:06against Mr. Romanowski, then this trial
1:22:07should be the best thing that could
1:22:09possibly happen to them. They could
1:22:14easily finish this trial by February or
1:22:19March. Dear viewers, since the
1:22:24prosecutor's office has been dragging
1:22:26this case on for so long, surely the
1:22:28indictment is already written, or even
1:22:30if it isn't, it could be written over a
1:22:32weekend—or, since prosecutors don't
1:22:34work weekends, within five working days
1:22:36. Yes. So what's the problem? What is
1:22:40the problem, ladies and gentlemen? What
1:22:42kind of problem is that? It is no
1:22:43problem at all. I remind you that
1:22:48before the 2023 elections, left-wing
1:22:50politicians claimed that these
1:22:51indictments were already written, which
1:22:53was interesting because who would have
1:22:55written them? After all, only a
1:22:58prosecutor can write such indictments.
1:23:01So who was supposed to write them? But
1:23:03ladies and gentlemen, it is clear that
1:23:08it was not only an admission of
1:23:12something very unconstitutional, but
1:23:14also untrue. No, but if they wanted to,
1:23:19Mr. Romanowski could come, be charged,
1:23:24and an indictment could be sent to
1:23:25court in a week. Given the gravity of
1:23:31the case, the trial could start in two
1:23:33or three weeks, holding three or four
1:23:35hearings a month. The case is quite
1:23:39straightforward. It could be over by
1:23:43February. You might tell me it's
1:23:45impossible. I remind you that they are
1:23:47doing exactly that to Mr. Braun. Mr.
1:23:49Braun has two, three, or four hearings
1:23:51a month. So why can't they do the same
1:23:54with Romanowski? If they have such
1:24:04solid dirt on Mr. Romanowski, what
1:24:05stops them from holding a show trial?
1:24:08Trial open to the media. That wouldn't
1:24:11be anything extraordinary. Let me
1:24:13remind you that in Poland, trials are
1:24:15generally public. Keeping them secret
1:24:19is what's extraordinary. Therefore, no
1:24:23one should have any complaints about
1:24:24them being open, none at all. Yes, so
1:24:32what's the point and present very
1:24:38strong evidence so that everyone would
1:24:40know, that everyone would know that Mr.
1:24:42Romanowski is, pardon my language,
1:24:47guilty as hell. Guilty as hell and
1:24:56that's it. And let it, and let it,
1:25:03pardon my language, let it go viral
1:25:08online. However, for some reason, damn
1:25:14it, they don't want to, and in my
1:25:15opinion, it's because they're afraid
1:25:17that it will end like it did with Mr.
1:25:19Braun, where Mr. Braun's trial gave
1:25:21more supporters to Mr. Braun than than
1:25:26to him, than than to the Tuskists. Mr.
1:25:32Braun's trial definitely serves Mr.
1:25:34Braun well, and I believe that's why
1:25:36they haven't put Mr. Braun on trial yet
1:25:38, at least for the destruction of that
1:25:40monument, because they think it would
1:25:41help him even more. So, so it's weak.
1:25:45Yes, so it's weak. However, from a
1:25:47common-sense perspective, Mr.
1:25:49Romanowski is returning from exile. Any
1:25:51one of us would be sitting in detention
1:25:53until the end of the trial in such a
1:25:55case. Mr. Romanowski will be walking
1:25:58around as a free man. With people, with
1:26:04people, sorry for stammering, honest
1:26:07people. And then, when PiS comes back
1:26:10to power, they will even pay him
1:26:11compensation. And if he is convicted,
1:26:15if, I emphasize, if he is convicted,
1:26:17then the case will later, the case will
1:26:23later, he will be pardoned by Mr. Duda,
1:26:31excuse me, now by Mr. Nawrocki, and if
1:26:33they don't manage to convict him, they
1:26:35will just withdraw the case from court
1:26:37and that's it. Though it seems that the
1:26:41"smiling" camp doesn't have a
1:26:42presidential candidate, so it's more
1:26:44like it's more like, either way, Mr.
1:26:52Romanowski would be pardoned, so for
1:26:55them, for the Tuskists, it should be
1:26:57better, right? At least they could put
1:27:02him on trial and show all the evidence
1:27:04they have. So they should be happy. For
1:27:07some reason, they’ve fallen into a
1:27:09panic. The only thing that comes to my
1:27:11mind is that they don't have the
1:27:13evidence at all. Next topic. And the
1:27:25next topic is that inflation has
1:27:27started. In the meantime, I had a
1:27:31computer breakdown. Unfortunately, dear
1:27:35folks, because of that, all, damn it,
1:27:37all those pages closed on me, but I
1:27:39found it, dear folks, so it wouldn't
1:27:41look like it was me. A strong jump.
1:27:45Inflation surprised everyone. Manuel.
1:27:48Robert Kędzierski. Well, I'll only say
1:27:50this: whoever it surprised, it
1:27:52surprised, and it didn't surprise those
1:27:54who have been saying for a long time
1:27:55that it would rise. For example, it
1:27:57didn't surprise me. But it is a fact.
1:27:59Dear folks, the GUS has published new
1:28:01inflation data. The index clearly rose
1:28:06from 3.4%a month ago to 4%, meaning we
1:28:09have a 0.6%monthly inflation increase.
1:28:14That is a very high figure, very high.
1:28:17Well, it will certainly rise even more
1:28:19in December, and it will keep growing
1:28:21until then. Well, ladies and gentlemen,
1:28:23fuel prices are influencing all of this
1:28:25. Everything is becoming more expensive
1:28:27due to fuel prices. Experts agree that
1:28:29high fuel prices are primarily to blame
1:28:30for this trend reversal. The Statistics
1:28:36Poland office released the latest data
1:28:38on price increases for September 2026.
1:28:42Consumer inflation stood at 4%
1:28:44year-on-year, which is a clear
1:28:46acceleration. Economists expected this
1:28:52scenario, pointing to rising fuel and
1:28:54food costs. Exactly what I was saying
1:29:00many, many, many weeks ago when I
1:29:02noticed the crisis coming. Fuel prices,
1:29:05food prices, and it’s going to get
1:29:07worse. The statistics office published
1:29:09this and so on and so forth. Well,
1:29:11inflation has taken off. I will spare
1:29:13you and myself the economic jargon,
1:29:15although I am personally interested in
1:29:17it, but I’m interested in these kinds
1:29:19of things. However, generally, the
1:29:22numbers and so on and so forth, that is
1:29:24not interesting, ladies and gentlemen.
1:29:26What is important is this. It is
1:29:28important that real inflation is much
1:29:30higher than the inflation reported by
1:29:32the GUS. Because the inflation reported
1:29:36by the GUS includes what is called an
1:29:38inflation basket, which contains
1:29:40various products that you don’t
1:29:41usually buy. Of course, you have food,
1:29:45fuel, and other such things, but you
1:29:48also have, for example, railway
1:29:49carriages or luxury limousines. How
1:29:53often do you buy a railway carriage? To
1:29:56be honest with you, I have never in my
1:29:57life bought a railway carriage. You
1:29:59know, it might sound strange, but I
1:30:01really have never in my life bought a
1:30:03railway carriage. And honestly, the
1:30:06fact that railway carriages get more
1:30:08expensive doesn’t make it harder for
1:30:09me to make ends meet. Although,
1:30:15paradoxically, even if the price of oil
1:30:17rises, it doesn't affect me that much
1:30:19for a simple reason: because I don't
1:30:21drive much. But, for example, when
1:30:25heating costs rise, that does hurt.
1:30:29When food costs rise, that does hurt.
1:30:33Especially since I try not to skimp on
1:30:35food so that I don't have to spend
1:30:37money on a doctor later, right?
1:30:40Especially for the most wonderful
1:30:42little being. For that reason, how to
1:30:50put it nicely, well, I spend a bit on
1:30:52that food, because right now, damn, a
1:30:54chicken raised without antibiotics, one
1:30:56such bird costs a ton of money, right?
1:31:04So that’s it. So we are dealing with
1:31:07a situation where, for example, food
1:31:10has gone up by 10%, and fuel has gone
1:31:15up by about 30 to 40%. but train cars
1:31:19got cheaper, luxury limousines got
1:31:21cheaper, something else got cheaper, so
1:31:23all in all that gives a 4%weighted
1:31:25average. No, but the thing is, you know
1:31:30, I don't buy a luxury limousine either
1:31:32. I don't know about you, but I drive a
1:31:37so-called average car. And I don't need
1:31:42to own a Mercedes S-Class, nor do I
1:31:44need to own a Rolls-Royce. Honestly, if
1:31:47I could afford a Rolls-Royce, I'd
1:31:49rather buy an apartment to rent out for
1:31:51that kind of money, damn it, instead of
1:31:53a car, right? But such things, ladies
1:31:56and gentlemen, sometimes happen to be
1:31:58in the inflation basket. I remember
1:32:01back in the PiS era. Once I met...I
1:32:06actually have this, ladies and
1:32:07gentlemen, this quirk. I don't know if
1:32:11it's because of that, maybe I'll just
1:32:13say it plainly, ladies and gentlemen, I
1:32:15often happen to run into politicians at
1:32:17a Lidl parking lot. And I wonder if
1:32:27it's this specific Lidl, that
1:32:28politicians often roam around there, or
1:32:32if politicians just often shop at Lidl
1:32:34in general, or, or, or I don't know.
1:32:40Anyway, ladies and gentlemen, there is
1:32:42this one Lidl where I've met
1:32:43politicians in the parking lot several
1:32:45times, and a few times there were
1:32:47various interesting conversations, so
1:32:49to speak. Once, ladies and gentlemen, I
1:32:53heard from a politician that I should
1:32:55get a real job. I cracked up so hard,
1:33:02that it was, well, simply incredible. I
1:33:05just couldn't stop laughing. The best
1:33:07part is that the politician probably
1:33:09didn't understand why I was laughing.
1:33:10But also, ladies and gentlemen, I once
1:33:12had a brief exchange of words—this
1:33:14was still in the PiS era—with a
1:33:16certain deputy minister of finance. I
1:33:18won't specify which one; there are
1:33:20always tons of those deputy ministers
1:33:22everywhere. A great many, God forbid
1:33:24I'm not disparaging, just a great many.
1:33:26Whether Tusk is in charge, or
1:33:27Kaczyński, or Morawiecki, there are
1:33:29always a hell of a lot of these deputy
1:33:30ministers. So there were plenty of
1:33:32deputy finance ministers too, and this
1:33:34one was actually cool, nice, he came
1:33:36over to talk. It turns out he watches
1:33:40me. I don't know how he reconciled
1:33:44watching me with my general "level hard
1:33:46" bashing of PiS back when they were in
1:33:48power. But I have always criticized
1:33:52whoever happens to be doing something,
1:33:54right? Because I don't criticize people
1:33:56, I don't attack personally, I just
1:33:58address what someone is doing. If PiS
1:34:01is ruling, I criticize PiS; if Civic
1:34:03Platform is currently ruling, I
1:34:05criticize the Platform, because it's
1:34:07the Platform doing something, right?
1:34:09It’s like, I don't know, a food
1:34:10critic, let's call him Książo. And he
1:34:14went around criticizing restaurants
1:34:15that are currently closed. No, you
1:34:17criticize, sometimes you praise,
1:34:19sometimes you reprimand, but that's
1:34:21what food criticism is. The same way I
1:34:24carry out political criticism of those
1:34:26who are currently in power. He was
1:34:28actually quite, I’d say, nice,
1:34:30friendly, and well-mannered. He came
1:34:32over to chat and introduced himself,
1:34:34actually. Not that it was anything
1:34:35interesting. Politicians usually have
1:34:37their heads up their own asses,
1:34:38thinking everyone knows them and is
1:34:40obligated to know who they are and what
1:34:42their names are. I’ve had funny
1:34:46situations like that in my life a few
1:34:48times, where some guy walks up and acts
1:34:50like I perfectly know who he is, when I
1:34:52have no clue. So I ask, and instead of
1:34:56saying who he is, he gets all indignant
1:34:58. Well, it’s happened in different
1:34:59ways. But he was polite, he came over,
1:35:01introduced himself, and said who he was
1:35:02. So we talked for a bit. I asked, hey,
1:35:06damn, when are they going to beat this
1:35:08inflation, because these were the times
1:35:10of record PiS-era inflation, right? I
1:35:14said, damn, this is ridiculous, I was
1:35:17just leaving Lidl and said: "Sir, look,
1:35:19I just spent a grand on groceries.""And
1:35:23I can fit all that food into three bags
1:35:25.""Sure, they’re big, sure, they’re
1:35:27bulging, sure, they’re heavy, but I
1:35:29spent a thousand." And he says: "Well
1:35:32yes, food is indeed more expensive, but
1:35:34Mr. Krzysztof, look, S-Class Mercedes
1:35:37prices have gone down." I just look at
1:35:40him. Sir, but I don't have an S-Class
1:35:45Mercedes. "Exactly, so maybe you'd want
1:35:47to buy one.""But I don't want to buy
1:35:49one, I’m buying groceries.""Well, you
1:35:51know, that’s the basket.""Some things
1:35:53get more expensive, others get cheaper.
1:35:55""All in all, it looks like this and so
1:35:57on and so forth.""Man, damn, but how
1:35:59many of us are buying S-Class Mercedes?
1:36:01""And how many of us are buying, damn,
1:36:03a baguette?" Yeah. And I think he
1:36:09realized what I meant, but didn't quite
1:36:11want to admit it, so to speak. And it's
1:36:17the same thing here. That 4%inflation,
1:36:19it's really only on paper. In what
1:36:22matters most—fuel, food costs,
1:36:24heating costs—we already have double
1:36:26digits, and it's going to get worse,
1:36:28ladies and gentlemen. It’s going to
1:36:30get worse, because all this nonsense
1:36:32with unblocking the Strait of Hormuz—
1:36:34just read up on how that "unblocking"
1:36:36of the Strait of Hormuz actually looks.
1:36:41It looks, ladies and gentlemen, like
1:36:43they managed to sneak two or three
1:36:45supertankers through, offloaded them
1:36:47into smaller ones, and that’s why
1:36:48they filled a few orders. Damn, you
1:36:54know, like when I, for example, don't
1:36:56know I'll sneak into the Sejm quietly,
1:37:00just so it's clear, I'm not planning it
1:37:02, yeah, but if I were to sneak into the
1:37:04Sejm, because I have, I don't know, a
1:37:06parliamentary ban for asking the "
1:37:07aggressive mouse" uncomfortable
1:37:09questions. And so I infiltrated the
1:37:13Sejm and managed to ask an
1:37:14uncomfortable question, for example, to
1:37:16the Speaker of the Sejm. Mr. Speaker,
1:37:18when you were taking a dump in the
1:37:20field, did you take toilet paper with
1:37:22you, or did you run around with a dirty
1:37:23ass afterward? Well, that doesn't mean
1:37:25they lifted my parliamentary ban and I
1:37:27can now enter the Sejm normally. No. It
1:37:30means that I managed to get in there
1:37:32somehow, I somehow managed to get in,
1:37:37not entirely legally. Yes. Just so
1:37:41there are no doubts, I'm neither
1:37:42interested in the cleanliness of
1:37:44Czarzasty's ass, nor do I intend to
1:37:46enter the Sejm, legally or illegally. I
1:37:49have better things to do than go to the
1:37:51Polish Sejm. Well, well, well.
1:37:53Seriously? Yes, but that was just an
1:37:55example. So, so that's it. Well, it
1:38:02looks like expensive fuel is here to
1:38:04stay and will likely keep getting more
1:38:06expensive, because take note, and this
1:38:08is something I often talk about, so I
1:38:10will repeat it again very clearly. We
1:38:22are dealing with price gouging. This is
1:38:24something I've been talking about for
1:38:26several years. It looks like this: when
1:38:28the dollar gets more expensive, the
1:38:30price of fuel rises significantly.
1:38:32Because oil is denominated in dollars.
1:38:34So when the dollar rises, the price of
1:38:37fuel rises significantly. Then the
1:38:40dollar drops, and the price of fuel
1:38:42either doesn't drop, or it drops very
1:38:44slowly. It went up by 50 groszy, for
1:38:48example, dropped by 10, then oil goes
1:38:50up, well, the price goes way up again.
1:38:54Then oil gets cheaper, but the fuel
1:38:56price gets only a little cheaper. And
1:38:58this, my dear friends, is price gouging
1:39:00. Right now, a barrel of oil costs
1:39:05about 100 dollars. The dollar dropped
1:39:12again, yet fuel at the stations is more
1:39:14expensive than when oil was 120 dollars
1:39:16a barrel and the dollar was about 7
1:39:18cents, 7 groszy more expensive than now
1:39:21. So, back then oil was more expensive,
1:39:26the dollar was more expensive, but fuel
1:39:28at the stations was cheaper. Well, you
1:39:30know, between 100 and 120, that's a 20%
1:39:32difference. And that is exactly this
1:39:35damn price gouging. Um. There's an
1:39:41upward impulse, and it rises very
1:39:42sharply. There's a downward impulse,
1:39:45and it drops very sharply. With these
1:39:49prices of oil and these dollar rates as
1:39:54they are now, gasoline should cost
1:39:56about 6 dollars. 6 PLN. Gasoline should
1:40:00cost about 6 PLN per liter. And how
1:40:03much does it cost? Over seven. It also
1:40:10depends on which kind. Or 95, 98. An
1:40:14eight now costs well over eight, right?
1:40:17So, that's that. We're just getting
1:40:23ripped off, plain and simple. And the
1:40:24argument, dear friends, my favorite
1:40:26argument: because it's expensive
1:40:27elsewhere, too. Well, it is expensive.
1:40:30So what? Uh, if, uh, my neighbor lets
1:40:35his daughter gorge on sweets, and
1:40:37because of that, she has concentration
1:40:39issues at a young age, gets obese, and
1:40:41faces the risk of diabetes, does that
1:40:43mean I should let my daughter eat
1:40:45unhealthily, so that she has those same
1:40:47problems in adulthood and...is unhappy
1:40:54because of it? I don't think so. Yeah,
1:40:58just because someone is hurting their
1:41:00child, it doesn't mean I should hurt
1:41:02mine. Because based on that logic, you
1:41:05could do anything bad to anyone, since
1:41:07there’s always someone somewhere
1:41:08doing something bad, probably even
1:41:10worse than we can imagine. Yes. So,
1:41:14okay. Well, in Europe, one should
1:41:18probably ask: how is it, dear friends,
1:41:20that such price hiking is happening in
1:41:22concert across the whole of Europe?
1:41:27There are places in the world where
1:41:28fuel is cheap. There are places, dear
1:41:30friends, where fuel costs half as much
1:41:32as in Poland. In fact, there are places
1:41:35in the world where fuel, converted to
1:41:37zlotys, costs just a few dozen groszy.
1:41:40Well, let's say in oil-producing
1:41:42countries; let's not go to such
1:41:44extremes. But take a look at the prices
1:41:48in Belarus and Russia. Take a look,
1:41:51dear friends, at the prices in Asian
1:41:53countries. What's the price in India,
1:41:58what's the price in...what's the price
1:42:00in those...What's the price in China?
1:42:10And here I would ask if we aren't
1:42:12dealing with some kind of price-fixing
1:42:14conspiracy, because Orlen ripping us
1:42:15off on prices is one thing, but their
1:42:17equivalents are also hard at work
1:42:19ripping off customers in their own
1:42:20countries. And the question is, when
1:42:28will someone finally investigate
1:42:30whether this is price-fixing—you know
1:42:32, a conspiracy among giants. Well,
1:42:35that's, I would say. Not exactly great.
1:42:40Moving on to the next topic. Topic
1:42:50number six. According to new data from
1:42:55the CDC, the number of young teenagers
1:42:57identifying as LGBT has dropped sharply
1:43:00in recent years. Perfect correlation
1:43:08since Trump cut off funding for school
1:43:10programs in the US deemed to support
1:43:12LGBT. Dear friends, there has been a
1:43:20dispute for a long time, let's call it.
1:43:24Oh, whether how to put it, whether the
1:43:34issue of LGBT identity is innate or
1:43:36acquired? Some say it's innate, some
1:43:42say it's acquired. And it seems to me
1:43:46that it's both. And now I'm going to
1:43:48annoy everyone. Honestly, I’ve always
1:43:54been, as they nicely put it, a vagina
1:43:56enthusiast, so I’ve never really been
1:43:58the wavering type. Yes, I’ve always,
1:44:04I’ve always been vagina-loving. Yes,
1:44:08there are surely people who are
1:44:09vagina-skeptical, or ladies and
1:44:11gentlemen, penis-loving,
1:44:12penis-skeptical, or generally
1:44:14indifferent to it all. There are surely
1:44:19people who, if I may put it that way,
1:44:21have it, have it innate—or so it
1:44:25seems to me. But I am convinced that
1:44:28some people are a bit wavering, and it
1:44:37seems to me that the environment has a
1:44:38lot to say here, that it really does
1:44:40work in such a way that some will be
1:44:42gay, will be those ladies who love
1:44:44ladies, completely regardless of,
1:44:50completely independent of, of all
1:44:52environmental factors. However, some
1:44:58people don't really know, and then
1:44:59depending on the environment they fall
1:45:01into, that’s the way they will go. If
1:45:08, as I think, if I may say so, and I
1:45:10happen to know many people who, you
1:45:13know, just to be clear, it may also be
1:45:18the case that such a person, who for
1:45:20example decides they are traditionally
1:45:25sexual, might later change in life,
1:45:27right? But, but that’s later. So,
1:45:34ladies and gentlemen, we now have
1:45:36something that, I would say, is nicely
1:45:38put as black and white, where we have
1:45:40statistical data to confirm it. Ladies
1:45:44and gentlemen, the portal is called
1:45:46UnHerd.com. The article title is: The
1:45:50number of young teenagers identifying
1:45:52as LGBT has fallen by more than 1/3. By
1:45:57Shay Ferguson. I will only read a
1:46:00fragment of the article because the
1:46:01rest is behind a paywall. According to
1:46:03new data from the Centers for Disease
1:46:05Control and Prevention, or CDC for
1:46:07short, the number of young teenagers
1:46:09identifying as lesbian, gay, or
1:46:11bisexual has dropped sharply in recent
1:46:13years. The data was interpreted by Jean
1:46:18Twenge, a professor of psychology at
1:46:20San Diego State University. It shows
1:46:25that the number of ninth-grade students
1:46:28in the USA, that is, 14 or 15-year-olds
1:46:30, identifying as LGB, fell from 17%in
1:46:382023 to 11%in 2025. By the way, 17%of
1:46:45students identifying as LGB there,
1:46:47meaning without the T, without trans,
1:46:50that 17%...Let me divide that, it’s
1:46:55almost, it’s about 1/6 or 1/7. I
1:47:00remember from my generation, those
1:47:02kinds of people, they were just
1:47:04individual cases, and there it’s
1:47:06almost 1/5, holy crap. However, in 2023
1:47:14, uh, so it fell from 2023, it was 17,
1:47:17then Trump came along, then Trump said
1:47:19that all schools that continue to
1:47:21support those, let’s say,
1:47:23pro-friendly programs would lose public
1:47:26funding, and it suddenly dropped to 11%
1:47:28in 2025. It’s still a gigantic number
1:47:36, ladies and gentlemen. I would even
1:47:38say that it’s totally gigantic, but
1:47:44definitely smaller. That’s a drop of
1:47:48six percentage points, and this
1:47:49correlation cannot be ignored. During
1:47:53the same period, there was also a
1:47:54decline in other high school age groups
1:47:56. Just as between 2019 and 2023 a sharp
1:48:03rise in the percentage of people
1:48:05identifying as LGB was recorded. When
1:48:08these educational programs started, for
1:48:1811 th-grade students, 16 and 17-
1:48:20year-olds, the number of teenagers
1:48:28identifying as LGB fell from about 18%
1:48:32in 2023 to 15%in 2025, while for 12
1:48:34th-grade students, 17 and 18-year-olds,
1:48:38the number fell from 18%to 16%, so
1:48:46it’s clear that this earlier
1:48:47indoctrination actually worked.
1:48:51According to Twenge, this decline is
1:48:53driven almost exclusively by girls,
1:49:00meaning that girls are—it would mean
1:49:01that girls are more susceptible to
1:49:03suggestions. According to high school
1:49:08girls, the percentage of people
1:49:10identifying as LGB fell, mind you, from
1:49:1327%in 2023 to 22%in 2025, which means,
1:49:16ladies and gentlemen, over a quarter of
1:49:18girls in the States identified as LGB,
1:49:21either lesbian or bisexual. Good, right
1:49:25? In 2015, before they implemented
1:49:30these programs, only about 13%of girls
1:49:33identified as LGB, so they implemented
1:49:35the programs, a sharp rise; they closed
1:49:38the programs, a sharp drop. The largest
1:49:44decline was recorded among girls
1:49:46identifying as bisexual. The number of
1:49:51ninth-grade girls who define themselves
1:49:53this way fell by half, from 26%in 2021
1:50:00to 13%in 2025. Heavy, I’d say, mega,
1:50:04mega heavy, especially in the context
1:50:06that these types of classes are
1:50:08currently being introduced into Polish
1:50:10schools. Well, hard statistical data
1:50:17would show that, and boom, once again,
1:50:19we know who was right. Heavy. Ladies
1:50:27and gentlemen, the last two topics,
1:50:29that is the seventh and eighth. Let me
1:50:31push them to tomorrow. I am very tired,
1:50:37I apologize, but it’s probably
1:50:39starting to show in my voice. I invite
1:50:42you for 2:00 PM. If all goes well, an
1:50:44interview with a wonderful person who
1:50:45has been greatly wronged. Take care,
1:50:47ladies and gentlemen. Best regards. See
1:50:49you later.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Stało Się! Wojsko Ruszyło! + Atak Na Samolot FlyDubai To Prowokacja?! - Analiza Ator by wideoprezentacje, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 14,310 words across 2,175 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.