YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → STAŁO SIĘ! Cyrk pod Trybunałem był tylko zasłoną dymną! Przed chwilą klepnęli DRUK 3003.

STAŁO SIĘ! Cyrk pod Trybunałem był tylko zasłoną dymną! Przed chwilą klepnęli DRUK 3003. — Transcript

by Suwerenny PL · 2,521 words · 442 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00My dear friends, the worst has happened
0:02. Literally just a moment ago. I waited
0:04until the very last second. I didn't
0:06want to make this video earlier. I had
0:08to have 100%proof that they really did
0:10it. Literally just a moment ago, today
0:13at 5:28 PM.
0:15>> Which of the deputies is in favor of
0:17adopting the entire draft law from
0:20document number 3251 along with the
0:22accepted amendments? Please raise your
0:24hand and press the button. Who is
0:26against? Who abstained? Thank you.
0:30443 deputies voted. 240 in favor, 202
0:34against. One person abstained. The Sejm
0:36has passed the act on restrictive
0:38measures.
0:41>> This coalition that is currently ruling
0:43, the ruling coalition, pushed through
0:45the Sejm in the third reading the most,
0:47I repeat, the most terrifying law of
0:48recent years.
0:52Government bill document number 3003.
0:56240 deputies.
1:00voted in favor, raised their hands for
1:02regulations that many had been warning
1:04against just a few hours ago.
1:10And now you know what all this confusion
1:12about the Constitutional Tribunal is for
1:14, all those smoke screens, because while
1:16we are focused on the Constitutional
1:18Tribunal, they are pushing through
1:19things that affect every Pole.
1:24Attention, this affects every Pole.
1:28PiS voters, Confederation voters,
1:30Platform voters, the Left, PSL, everyone
1:33, literally everyone.
1:39Those who don't realize it yet,
1:40seriously imagine such a scenario, that
1:42there will be a real problem, just so
1:44you don't think I'm making things up.
1:47Document number 3003
1:51is today's vote.
1:53This is exactly vote number 89 at the
1:5568th sitting of the Sejm.
1:59Here we have the results.
2:02443 voted, 240 in favor, 202 against,
2:10one abstained, 17 did not vote.
2:13I always wonder what they do during the
2:15time they aren't voting. No, lazy people
2:18.
2:18Some call them lazy good-for-nothings.
2:21Look.
2:24Look and admire these people whom we
2:26voted for in the elections.
2:30I mean, I didn't vote for them and
2:31neither did you.
2:33Look what happened here.
2:35As for the coalition, I won't even
2:37mention it, everyone in favor except for
2:39those three lazy ones; as for PiS.
2:42Alright, they voted against.
2:44Rozwój Plus against.
2:47PSL obviously in favor, the Left in
2:49favor, Confederation against, one in the
2:51center broke ranks, it doesn't matter,
2:54Poland 2050 obviously in favor,
2:56Democracy against, Confederation of the
2:58Polish Crown against.
3:01My dear friends, have mercy, damn it,
3:03seriously.
3:05It is beyond human comprehension.
3:08I wonder how it is, because look, they
3:10really don't have their own opinion.
3:13Seriously, in the Civic Coalition, does
3:15no one see a problem with this? Really?
3:19Your families, your loved ones, friends
3:21, you don't care?
3:23Do you really have to vote the way Tusk
3:24tells you? This is just unbelievable.
3:26Following this line of thinking, why do
3:28we need deputies? Just put some nameless
3:30people there. What for? It doesn’t
3:32matter anyway, since the boss will tell
3:33us whether to vote for or against it.
3:35And the fact that PiS voted against it,
3:37well, you know how that goes. You know
3:39how it is. Here you have the entire bill
3:41.
3:43Over 200 pages. Unbelievable. I’m going
3:46to show you everything right here. The
3:48ins and outs. What is this about?
3:50Imagine you wake up in the morning.
3:54You’ve made your coffee, tea, breakfast
3:56, and you’ve left calmly for work,
3:58school, or maybe to the bakery.
4:02At the same time, literally at the same
4:04time, you stop being the owner of your
4:06house, apartment, or, for example, your
4:08company, or anything that belonged to
4:10you.
4:12You worked hard your whole life, and you
4:14lose it.
4:15No one even knocked on your door.
4:17No one even informed you about it.
4:21No mailman brought a registered letter,
4:23there was no court hearing, absolutely
4:25nothing.
4:27You didn’t hear any verdict, yet you
4:29lost everything.
4:30Some conspiracy theory? Absolutely not,
4:33after all, you saw today’s voting
4:35results.
4:36People really don’t realize what this
4:38means.
4:44An entry appears in your home’s land
4:45registry because some dandy, some
4:47minister somewhere in Warsaw in the Sejm
4:49, signed an administrative decision
4:51under his desk or hid behind it so you
4:52wouldn’t see.
4:58And the worst thing about all this is
4:59that you don’t even know about it. I
5:01mean, we don't know about it.
5:03Not until you check it yourself
5:05somewhere in a government bulletin
5:06online.
5:09Do you understand, damn it, you lose
5:11something of yours, no one informs you,
5:13and you only find out if you look it up
5:15yourself.
5:19Specially for you, I dug through 20
5:21pages of the original draft today.
5:28A fresh report from today’s vote, just
5:30to show you point by point exactly what
5:32they just pushed through in the Sejm.
5:37And when you see articles number 4, 24,
5:4525, and 28, all the puzzle pieces of
5:48these last days, months, or even years
5:50will form a whole, a blood-curdling
5:52whole.
5:58And the skeptics will finally understand
6:00why this whole charade, this performance
6:02, was put on at the Constitutional
6:04Tribunal.
6:11Oh, the algorithm really doesn't like it
6:13when I or my colleagues bring these
6:15documents to light to show you, while
6:17the TV stations have, as they say,
6:19bitten their tongues.
6:24They sit quiet, don't know what's going
6:26on, blabber on about nothing, but they
6:28won't say a word about this. Why won't
6:30they say it? Well, because people would
6:32be scared.
6:33That is why, my friends, right at the
6:35start of this video, leave a thumbs up
6:37as your expression of opposition to the
6:39quiet pushing through of what they
6:41passed today, this bill print 300.
6:46If you agree, then react and write a
6:48comment.
6:49This will really help the skeptics learn
6:51, help them see; they’ll be scrolling
6:53through the internet, YouTube, and maybe
6:55they’ll stumble upon it, click, hear it
6:57, and maybe get a little wiser.
7:00For the whole week, seven days, we have
7:01been living—and still are living—with
7:03what’s been happening around the
7:05Constitutional Tribunal.
7:07I was stressed, everyone was stressed;
7:09we couldn’t sleep at night.
7:12Yesterday I spoke to you casually,
7:14openly, and bluntly.
7:19About how much it hurts that such a
7:21serious civil and social uprising was
7:23turned into a circus, a festival, songs
7:25, and revelry that Helmut simply mocked
7:27, mocked, and laughed at.
7:32Let’s ask ourselves a simple question
7:33today.
7:36Why were the government, why was Helmut
7:38in such a rush, why were they so anxious
7:40to act, to paralyze the Constitutional
7:42Tribunal right now?
7:46What for, why did they need all this
7:48commotion, this charade, this cabaret,
7:50these police cordons, this distraction
7:52for the whole of Poland? What do you
7:54think? The answer is right here.
7:57I want to stop for a moment and ask why
7:59the media is silent about document
8:01number 3003; not a single word on TV,
8:03literally not a single word.
8:06Just squabbling and singing on every
8:08channel.
8:10Yet the foundation, I emphasize, the
8:12foundation of law and property.
8:15The most important thing for us, for
8:17every person, Pole, citizen, is total
8:19silence.
8:20Why?
8:24Because the Constitutional Tribunal, my
8:26dear friends, is the only safety valve
8:28in the country, in Poland.
8:35The only institution that could
8:36immediately block such a law and declare
8:38it contradictory to the Polish
8:40Constitution.
8:44That’s what it's about. Now you know
8:46what it’s about.
8:48See how this plan was perfectly executed
8:50.
8:57First, they had to neutralize the
8:59Constitutional Tribunal, lock it down,
9:01spark a huge crisis and protest at its
9:03gates, throw the crowd some games so
9:05they’d be satisfied, interested, and
9:07looking only in one direction.
9:16And at that very same time, today at
9:185:28 PM, quietly, very quietly, they
9:21sneaked through the vote on document
9:233003 in the Sejm.
9:25At the same time, when people under the
9:27Constitutional Tribunal were singing
9:29Krawczyk’s songs.
9:31Literally, in their rooms, in their
9:33stinking offices, it started to smell.
9:38They closed off the system, my friends,
9:40which gives them—those wretches, those
9:42politicians—direct tools to take over
9:44our assets.
9:47This law will hit citizens exceptionally
9:49hard.
9:51It will strike with tremendous force.
9:53Like a hurricane, it will literally tear
9:55off the roofs.
10:00Some of you might think: "Well, Andrzej
10:02, aren't these laws about restrictive
10:04measures made against terrorists,
10:06foreign agencies, big oligarchs, or some
10:08bad people?"
10:13And what does that have to do with me?
10:16with the average Joe who has a house, an
10:18apartment, or a business.
10:20In document number 3003, there is
10:22article four; I will read it to you now
10:25.
10:29National restrictive measures can be
10:31applied to a natural person, truly
10:33anyone, you know this, whose activities
10:35pose another serious threat to democracy
10:37and the rule of law.
10:43Seriously, such text is in this bill.
10:46Orwell 2.0. Read it for yourselves, my
10:49friends, once more.
10:51A natural person whose activities pose
10:53another serious threat to democracy and
10:55the rule of law.
10:59After all, this is a paragraph that they
11:01, the rulers, can apply to absolutely
11:04anything and anyone, every single
11:05citizen.
11:08literally anything.
11:11Tell me hand on heart, honestly, who,
11:13whom do the politicians currently in
11:15power call a threat to democracy and the
11:17rule of law today—me, you—attention, I
11:20will answer.
11:23Anyone who dares, who has the nerve and
11:25courage to disagree with them.
11:28When you go to a protest at the
11:30Constitutional Tribunal, according to
11:32them, you are then striking at the rule
11:33of law.
11:40When you support some opposition,
11:41politicians from another party, or write
11:43comments online exposing Donald Tusk's
11:45government, in their opinion, in their
11:48new buzzwords, in their new dictionary,
11:50you are a threat to democracy.
11:55I mean, it's written right there. Yes.
12:03Let's move on to the very heart of this
12:05mechanism of theirs, this draft 3003,
12:07because someone will ask me now: "Okay,
12:09Andrzej, they label some person a threat
12:12under article four, but how can they
12:14physically take someone's house,
12:15apartment, or property without a court
12:17verdict, without a bailiff?"
12:26Well, my friends, look at pages 19 and
12:2920 of document 3003.
12:33It is a noose. It has three stages.
12:36Step by step, it cuts us, the citizens,
12:39off from our property.
12:42Let's start with the first stage, that
12:44is article 24, which you won't hear
12:45about on TV, which will never be
12:47mentioned.
12:49paragraph one and paragraph two.
12:53Paragraph one states that in the event
12:55of applying specific national sanctions
12:57, the state may—meaning the rulers can—
12:59establish administration over our assets
13:02.
13:07for the purpose, attention, of seizing
13:09property if they deem it necessary to
13:11protect an important public interest,
13:13the economic interest of the state, or
13:15the security of the state.
13:21So, in summary, before they formally
13:23take our property, they will introduce
13:25government administration into our
13:27businesses, our houses, and apartments.
13:31Sounds mysterious, funny. stupid, but
13:34that's how it will be. And who will
13:35issue such a decision? This is important
13:37. No, not some independent court.
13:40Absolutely not. Total nonsense, as they
13:42say. Read paragraph two of article 24
13:45for yourselves.
13:48I quote: "The decision is issued by the
13:50minister responsible for economy."
13:54against this decision.
13:56Attention, there is no right to a motion
13:59for reconsideration, and the decision
14:01itself is subject to immediate—I
14:03emphasize—immediate execution.
14:07They will execute it immediately.
14:11Hold on to your seats now, because the
14:13real shock comes in Article 24,
14:15paragraph 6.
14:21How do you think we will find out, or
14:23how will you find out, that some
14:25minister has established some kind of
14:26management over our property?
14:31Do you think a mailman will bring it by
14:33registered letter directly into your
14:35hands?
14:37Well no, because paragraph 6 provides
14:39for notifying parties by, get this,
14:41publishing the decision in the Public
14:43Information Bulletin, yes, on the
14:45internet.
14:46Alright, moving on.
14:50Someone might say: "Well Andrzej, once
14:52they discover it and I file a complaint
14:54with the administrative court, the court
14:56will surely stay the minister's decision
14:58."
15:00Well, absolutely not, nothing could be
15:02further from the truth. Look at page 20
15:05of the document, Article 24 and Article
15:0724, paragraph 10, look, it states
15:10clearly.
15:12The contested decision remains in force
15:14until the final judgment is rendered.
15:21And what happens to our rights during
15:22all those years before the court issues
15:24a final verdict?
15:29The answer, my friends, is in Article 25
15:32, paragraph 2, which you see now.
15:37It provides for the total loss of the
15:39right to manage, use, and dispose of
15:41property under management.
15:45Get the picture? Do you understand this
15:47?
15:50No court has even touched it yet, hasn't
15:51even considered if a minister is right,
15:53and you have already lost the right to
15:55use and manage your own property.
16:01And only as the third, final cherry on
16:04top, the stage is Article 28, Article 28
16:06, paragraph 1.
16:10Taking over ownership happens by way of
16:12a decision by the minister responsible
16:14for, excuse me, the economy.
16:17See how all this works. See how they
16:19have arranged all these stages for
16:20themselves. Article 4.
16:24They make us a threat to the rule of law
16:26.
16:27Article 24 and 25.
16:31Some minister with one signature takes
16:33away the right to use property.
16:37Article 28.
16:40A minister's administrative decision is
16:42used to strike us from land registers.
16:45Pure, I don't even know what to call it
16:47.
16:49Bolshevism is still a mild version, who
16:51knows. Write in the comments what to
16:53call it.
16:54How to call this?
16:56Name this thing.
16:59See how all these elements, all these
17:01building blocks from this past week,
17:02connect into one whole.
17:06Into such a picture of misery and
17:08despair.
17:12Now you know, now you know why they
17:14attacked the Constitutional Tribunal
17:16with such fury and such neurosis, and
17:18why at the same time they tried to treat
17:20President Karol Nawrocki in such an ugly
17:22way.
17:30Because they knew perfectly well that
17:32when they push through this draft 3000,
17:34sorry, 3, the only wall that will stand
17:36in their way, which will be able to
17:37protect our property, will be the
17:39President, a presidential veto, or an
17:41independent Constitutional Tribunal.
17:47And what? Answer for yourselves what has
17:49happened now, what is happening.
17:55We cannot allow them to take away our
17:57basic, fundamental civil rights in this
17:59way, under media cover, under media
18:01silence, while they’ve staged some kind
18:03of spectacle for us; no, we cannot allow
18:05this.
18:10Do you know what will happen now?
18:12Now it will go to the Senate, they’ll
18:14rubber-stamp it in the Senate, then it
18:16goes to the president, and everything
18:17will be in the president's hands.
18:20And that’s all on this topic. Thank you
18:21all very much. Write comments on what
18:23you think about this. I am very grateful
18:25to you.
18:27You can share this or boost it if you
18:29have an unused limit, because I think
18:31there are some limits on boosting.
18:33Thank you, have a great weekend. I’m
18:35sorry for this kind of news, but what
18:37can I do? I waited until the very last
18:39moment.
18:40I didn't want to make this video before
18:41the vote, but I ended up catching the
18:43vote.
18:44Thank you. Talk to you later. Bye.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of STAŁO SIĘ! Cyrk pod Trybunałem był tylko zasłoną dymną! Przed chwilą klepnęli DRUK 3003. by Suwerenny PL, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,521 words across 442 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.