SpaceX Went Public - A Disaster Waiting to Happen — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00If you give me $500, would you invest
- 0:01into SpaceX? I I I think I would, yeah.
- 0:03>> No, I wouldn't that.
- 0:04>> You would not.
- 0:05>> No, but I hope my index funds aren't
- 0:07automatically doing it.
- 0:07>> Hi, welcome to another episode of
- 0:09ColdFusion. SpaceX is an incredible
- 0:12company with impressive achievements. It
- 0:14brought the price of space launches down
- 0:16by 85%. Objectively, that is
- 0:18astonishing. The company also made
- 0:21reusable rockets reality. Many critics
- 0:23said that was impossible. If you love
- 0:24your engineering and physics, yep, great
- 0:26[music] company. But now, there's a
- 0:28massive problem. Recently, something has
- 0:31gone terribly wrong with the company.
- 0:32It's no longer what most people think it
- 0:34is. Let me ask you a question. What type
- 0:37of company do you think SpaceX is? You
- 0:39might say a rocket cargo company that
- 0:41operates satellite communications. For
- 0:43those who are more optimistic, you could
- 0:45say that SpaceX is an exploration
- 0:47company who will take humanity to the
- 0:49moon and beyond. Well, according to
- 0:51their own S-1 filing, the documents a
- 0:53company needs to file before it goes
- 0:54public on the stock market, both of
- 0:56those answers are wrong.
- 0:58Generally, S-1 filings list the industry
- 1:00category that a company is under. For
- 1:02example, the industry code 3760 is for
- 1:05spacecraft, 3182 is for defense and
- 1:08aeronautical. Other companies like
- 1:10Virgin Galactic, Boeing, etc., all file
- 1:13under these categories. But for SpaceX,
- 1:15they filed under the industry code of
- 1:177370.
- 1:19That's computer programming and data
- 1:21processing. Oh, it looks like SpaceX is
- 1:24officially filing to be an AI data
- 1:26center company. That already raises an
- 1:28eyebrow, but it's worse than that. To
- 1:30understand how, you first need to
- 1:32understand what a TAM is. TAM stands for
- 1:34total addressable market. It's the
- 1:36maximum revenue opportunity available
- 1:38for a product or service if you achieved
- 1:40100% market share. It basically
- 1:42represents to your investors what the
- 1:44market for your product is.
- 1:46Looking at the prospectus, SpaceX's
- 1:48[music] TAM is 28.5 trillion,
- 1:50approximately the size of the GDP of the
- 1:52United States. Okay, that's pretty high,
- 1:54but that's not the bizarre part. The
- 1:55strangest part is only 15% of this
- 1:58market is space and communications, and
- 2:00it's written right here in front of your
- 2:02face in plain text on page 11.
- 2:05So, 85% of the company is essentially
- 2:08just a wrapper for yet another LLM and
- 2:11data center business [music]
- 2:12like Anthropic or OpenAI. I know some of
- 2:15you guys have commented [music] that
- 2:16you're getting sick of hearing about AI,
- 2:18but this isn't funny anymore. It's
- 2:20getting really serious.
- 2:21When SpaceX went [music] public, it was
- 2:23the largest launch of any company in the
- 2:26history of financial markets, [music]
- 2:28larger than Amazon, Google, Alibaba, and
- 2:31even Saudi Aramco.
- 2:33In the first few hours of trading,
- 2:35SpaceX [music] blasted past a valuation
- 2:37of $2.3 trillion,
- 2:39instantly becoming the seventh most
- 2:41valuable company and worth approximately
- 2:43the same as the country of Canada.
- 2:45For some people, this seemed like a sign
- 2:47of strength, but for others, it was
- 2:48terrifying, the signs of an overheated
- 2:51market. But, that's not all.
- 2:54The story of the SpaceX IPO is telling
- 2:57us something if we listen closely. It
- 2:58shines a light on the state of the
- 3:00current financial markets. A corporation
- 3:03is hiding an AI company losing a billion
- 3:05dollars a month inside [music] the brand
- 3:06of a perfectly healthy rocket company
- 3:08just so investors fund it. Let me say
- 3:11that again. In 2026, a corporation can
- 3:14disguise an AI company losing almost a
- 3:16billion dollars a month inside of a
- 3:17perfectly healthy rocket company, sell
- 3:19it to investors, and get away with it.
- 3:22>> You know, your expectation is not going
- 3:23to be a good investment in that
- 3:25>> That's the part that I'm trying to
- 3:26understand. I found that that it just
- 3:28it's never
- 3:29been a great bet to bet against Elon.
- 3:32>> I I'll I'll [music] grant you all that.
- 3:34>> If you again, look at the S1, the TAM,
- 3:36the total addressable market is defined
- 3:38at 28.5 trillion.
- 3:4185% of that TAM
- 3:44>> [music]
- 3:44>> is in AI. So, even if everything you say
- 3:47about SpaceX and Starlink [music] is
- 3:49true, the entire company is being bet on
- 3:53AI in in terms of of its future, not on
- 3:56space and and not on Starlink.
- 4:00Those are his words, not mine.
- 4:02>> It's a mess, and in this episode, it's
- 4:04going [music] to be a wild ride. And a
- 4:05disclaimer, none of this is financial
- 4:07advice. If you want to buy the stock,
- 4:10buy it. If you don't, don't. But let's
- 4:12get into it.
- 4:15>> You are watching ColdFusion TV.
- 4:18>> There's a lot of excitement about what's
- 4:20going to happen.
- 4:20>> Everything they can possibly do to
- 4:22guarantee a pop is being done.
- 4:24>> This is going to become the largest
- 4:26company on the planet.
- 4:28>> For over two decades, SpaceX earned its
- 4:30dominance the hard and old-fashioned
- 4:32way. Three catastrophic early failures,
- 4:35a near bankruptcy that Musk described as
- 4:37existential, a methodically driven slow
- 4:39rise, and finally, a near monopoly on
- 4:42orbital launches.
- 4:43In a company full of moonshots, if we
- 4:45isolate Starlink, it's the only thing
- 4:47that actually makes money. The Starlink
- 4:49internet service has a constellation of
- 4:51over 9,000 satellites [music] and
- 4:52generated 11.4 billion in revenue and
- 4:554.4 billion in operating profit in 2025.
- 4:58But the rest of the company is another
- 5:00story, and trust me, we'll get to that.
- 5:02And from here, the controversy begins.
- 5:08When people talk about the broader
- 5:09market, they're referring to the S&P
- 5:11500. It includes all the big names like
- 5:13Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon.
- 5:16SpaceX had hoped to fast-track its way
- 5:18into the S&P 500 immediately upon
- 5:21listing. This was essentially changing
- 5:22the rules. They were essentially forcing
- 5:25the general public to buy the stock.
- 5:27Fast-tracking its way into the index
- 5:28would have forced every 401k and even
- 5:30pension funds to buy the stock. This
- 5:32isn't just American citizens we're
- 5:34talking about, but investment funds of
- 5:36everyday people all around the world.
- 5:38Roughly 14 billion of automatic passive
- 5:41fund inflows going straight [music] into
- 5:42SpaceX. It would have been a massive
- 5:44wealth transfer, but thankfully, the
- 5:46index committee said no.
- 5:48Why?
- 5:49SpaceX was just too risky. To join the
- 5:52S&P, a company first must be profitable
- 5:54in its most recent four quarters. SpaceX
- 5:57didn't meet the mark. Despite posting 18
- 5:59billion in revenue in 2025, which was a
- 6:0233% year-over-year increase, it lost 5
- 6:05billion for the same [music] year. So,
- 6:07the S&P 500 refused to play ball, and
- 6:09now that $14 billion in passive funds is
- 6:11off the table. But, the Nasdaq, [music]
- 6:13they said yes. So, there still will be
- 6:15some passive funding.
- 6:16>> And because SpaceX will be fast-tracked
- 6:18onto the Nasdaq index, major funds will
- 6:21be forced to buy some shares.
- 6:23>> A lot of Australian investors will be
- 6:26exposed to SpaceX whether they want to
- 6:28be or not.
- 6:32>> SpaceX spent years dismissing the public
- 6:34markets. Elon Musk had watched what
- 6:36quarterly earnings obsession did to
- 6:38Tesla.
- 6:39For a company that measures success in
- 6:41orbital mechanics and decades,
- 6:43impressing shareholders in a 90-day
- 6:44cycle seemed like a poor fit.
- 6:47In fiscal year 2023, SpaceX's CapEx was
- 6:50manageable at 42% of revenue. And in
- 6:532024, SpaceX was even profitable,
- 6:56clearing about 791 million in net
- 6:58income. For an expense-heavy rocket
- 7:00company, that is remarkable. So, what
- 7:03changed? Two letters, AI. In February of
- 7:072026, SpaceX merged with xAI. Now, the
- 7:11company's performance was in shambles.
- 7:13>> [music]
- 7:13>> After the merge, the required
- 7:15retrospective accounting attributed to
- 7:17that net loss of 5 billion we talked
- 7:18about in 2025. xAI is the company that's
- 7:21bleeding so much money that it needed
- 7:23the public to fund it. Starlink [music]
- 7:25profits alone weren't nearly enough.
- 7:27>> Career market analysts like Michael
- 7:29McCarthy say investors should be
- 7:30extremely cautious. [music]
- 7:32>> No matter how we cut the numbers, they
- 7:34simply don't add up.
- 7:36>> In 2025, xAI was losing $2 for every
- 7:39dollar earned,
- 7:40>> [clears throat]
- 7:40>> burning through approximately $28
- 7:42million per day, quarterly losses
- 7:44accelerated through the year. By Q1 of
- 7:462026, XAI's capital expenditure alone
- 7:50reached $7.7 billion.
- 7:52That's an annualized pace of 30.8
- 7:54billion, more than double the entire
- 7:56prior year. In that same period,
- 7:58SpaceX's capital expenditure had gone
- 8:00from that manageable 42% of revenue to
- 8:03215% of revenue.
- 8:06Objectively, SpaceX [music]
- 8:07was a great company by itself. There was
- 8:09no need to shove AI into it. Every
- 8:12dollar that XAI burns is a dollar that
- 8:14the rest of the company could have used.
- 8:16>> [music]
- 8:16>> So, to summarize, in one transaction, a
- 8:19focused aerospace business became a
- 8:21conglomerate of rockets, satellites,
- 8:23[music]
- 8:23social media, and a chatbot in the form
- 8:26of Grok. Up next, we'll see some of the
- 8:28bizarre things happening with XAI, and
- 8:30then we'll take a close look at SpaceX's
- 8:32biggest bet, data centers in space.
- 8:35But first, this message is sponsored by
- 8:38Raycon. Finding a gift that's actually
- 8:40useful is the hard part, but Raycon's
- 8:42essential open ear buds are one of those
- 8:44things I can genuinely see getting used
- 8:45every day. [music] I've been using them
- 8:47quite a bit recently on walks, while
- 8:49running errands, and even working from
- 8:50home. What makes them different is the
- 8:52open ear design. They [music] sit just
- 8:54outside your ear canal, so you can
- 8:55listen to music, podcasts, or calls
- 8:58while still hearing what's going on
- 8:59around you. Whether I'm walking through
- 9:01the neighborhood or just getting outside
- 9:03after working on a script the whole day,
- 9:04I don't feel completely disconnected
- 9:06from everything around me. They're also
- 9:08incredibly lightweight, and the flexible
- 9:10multi-angler ear hook means that they
- 9:12stay secure without becoming
- 9:13uncomfortable. Whether I've worn them on
- 9:15long walks, around the house, or during
- 9:17workouts, after a while, you honestly
- 9:19forget you're wearing them. A few
- 9:20features that make this a go-to pair of
- 9:22headphones is the open ear design, the
- 9:24comfortable fit, and the multi-point
- 9:25connection. I can switch between my
- 9:27phone and laptop without having to
- 9:29reconnect anything, and the battery life
- 9:30is also excellent, up to 36 hours with
- 9:33the charging case. I charge them maybe
- 9:35once a week. Raycon now has over 3
- 9:37million customers [music] and the sound
- 9:39quality is right up there with the far
- 9:40more expensive brands. Plus, they come
- 9:42with a 30-day guarantee, so there's
- 9:44really no risk trying them out. I got
- 9:46one of these for Mother's Day, too, and
- 9:48she started using it as well. So, if
- 9:49you're looking for something practical
- 9:51this Father's Day, this is a great
- 9:52option. Upgrade your dad's [music]
- 9:54workout routine. Go to
- 9:55buyraycon.com/coldfusionopen
- 9:58to get 15% off. Thanks to Raycon for
- 10:00supporting Cold Fusion. Now, let's get
- 10:02back to these data centers in space.
- 10:07Since AI is 85% of the company's
- 10:09proposed market, we're forced to look at
- 10:11how xAI is performing in the LLM
- 10:13landscape.
- 10:15So, users switch between ChatGPT,
- 10:17Claude, Gemini, and Grok consistently.
- 10:20Critics argue that AI is essentially a
- 10:23commodity at this point. Nobody talks
- 10:25about Grok being the market leader
- 10:27except for users on the X platform. In
- 10:29fact, according to some estimates, Grok
- 10:31only has 0.4%
- 10:33of enterprise use. In the AI sector,
- 10:36enterprise is where all the money is.
- 10:37So, that's not a good sign. All right,
- 10:39well, maybe the management team is a
- 10:41star-studded lineup of smart people, so
- 10:43they'll figure it out, right?
- 10:44Well, perhaps not. Musk founded xAI with
- 10:4711 co-founders in 2023. Today, all 11
- 10:51have left. There's zero remaining.
- 10:54Okay, so that's not encouraging, but
- 10:56that's still fine. They can still make
- 10:58money by selling compute to other AI
- 10:59companies. Well, there's some problems
- 11:01there, too. The deals so far don't give
- 11:03an aura of confidence.
- 11:06Google entered a partnership with xAI to
- 11:08lease some GPU compute for $920 million
- 11:10a month. Sounds great, but when you look
- 11:13deeper into the deal, there's a strange
- 11:15smell. Firstly, either party can
- 11:17terminate the contract with 90 days
- 11:19notice. Okay, that's a bit tenuous, but
- 11:21reading further, you learn that Google
- 11:23has a 6% stake in xAI, and there you go.
- 11:27That smell gets stronger. It smells like
- 11:29yet more circular financing with a
- 11:31sprinkle of revenue boosting for the
- 11:33SpaceX IPO season. Okay, so what about
- 11:35Anthropic? Didn't they sign a deal with
- 11:37SpaceX in May of 2026? Yes, but the way
- 11:40that deal came about is hilarious. It
- 11:42turns out that XAI screwed up the design
- 11:45for their first mega data center. For
- 11:46some reason, they built it with three
- 11:48different types of GPUs. This meant that
- 11:51the fastest GPUs, which are sitting
- 11:52there idle, waiting for the slower ones
- 11:54to finish. The result was that AI
- 11:56training only ran at 11% of full
- 11:58capacity according to sources. Seeing
- 12:00that it was useless for training, XAI
- 12:03decided to rent out the data center and
- 12:05move the training of Grok to a new one.
- 12:07So, that's not a great sign in
- 12:08management competence. But okay, that's
- 12:10fine. The company can still make money
- 12:12with a data center in space.
- 12:17SpaceX has filed with the FCC to build a
- 12:19space cloud of up to 1 million
- 12:21satellites. Orbital AI compute is
- 12:24targeted to begin by 2028, but launching
- 12:26a million satellites is a lot. The
- 12:28Starlink network has 9,000 satellites.
- 12:31So, imagine over 100 times that number
- 12:33orbiting the Earth.
- 12:35>> [music]
- 12:36>> Two years ago, I literally moderated a
- 12:38panel on space junk, and I was even on
- 12:40the news talking about it.
- 12:42Although SpaceX's satellites have
- 12:44autonomous avoidance systems,
- 12:45coordinating 9,000 objects and
- 12:48coordinating 1 million objects are two
- 12:50completely different challenges. I truly
- 12:52believe that if we don't want space
- 12:54debris becoming a hot topic in 15 to 20
- 12:56years, sending 1 million satellites into
- 12:58orbit with GPU technology that will be
- 13:01outdated in 3 years just isn't a good
- 13:04idea. Or am I the crazy one here? Maybe
- 13:07there's something I'm missing, but it
- 13:08doesn't look like a financially
- 13:10competitive idea at all. In fact, it
- 13:12seems kind of wasteful.
- 13:14It seems like even in the best case
- 13:15scenario, with every new GPU release
- 13:17from Nvidia, the orbital data center
- 13:19will become less and less competitive
- 13:21over time. In the worst case, if LLM
- 13:24algorithms get vastly more efficient or
- 13:26AI running locally on devices becomes
- 13:28the norm, that seems to me like a huge
- 13:30threat to the central thesis of a space
- 13:32data center.
- 13:33But I do get the basic idea here. On my
- 13:36last episode about data centers, I got
- 13:38so many comments from you guys saying
- 13:39how horrible it is living next to them.
- 13:41Some of your stories were heartbreaking.
- 13:43So yes, I can see people wanting an
- 13:45alternative. But as for actually putting
- 13:47data centers in space, I'm just not so
- 13:48sure personally. So it remains to be
- 13:50seen how well this works out
- 13:52economically.
- 13:54From an engineering point of view,
- 13:55leaving aside the cost of launching that
- 13:57much mass, dissipating the heat
- 13:59radiation from the GPUs will be a
- 14:00challenge. In space, there's no air, no
- 14:03water, and no convection. So radiating
- 14:06heat away becomes very inefficient. But
- 14:08this is their area of expertise, so
- 14:10they've probably got it figured out.
- 14:12That being said, there are some other
- 14:14things to consider though. They are as
- 14:16follows.
- 14:17Cosmic rays and protons can cause bit
- 14:19flipping in memory, resulting in errors
- 14:21in calculations, and that's not great
- 14:23for some of the most densely packed
- 14:25transistor technology in existence. And
- 14:27also, energetic solar particles can
- 14:29destroy unshielded GPUs. Van Allen belt
- 14:32electrons degrade solar panels over
- 14:34time. And most devastating of all, solar
- 14:36flares can cause massive radiation
- 14:37sparks, resulting in the potential loss
- 14:39of the GPUs. To fix this, each satellite
- 14:43must require heavy radiation shielding
- 14:45and possibly redundant systems. Without
- 14:47it, the data center performance will
- 14:49inevitably degrade over time. All of
- 14:50this add mass and cost.
- 14:53But what do I know? Obviously, I'm not
- 14:55sure what the future holds. So we'll
- 14:56have to wait and see if this risky long
- 14:58shot plays out. So, if orbital data
- 15:01centers don't end up working, in the
- 15:02prospectus, they're still talk of
- 15:04asteroid mining and Mars colonies. So
- 15:06that's got to be worth a lot of money,
- 15:07right?
- 15:08Well, even so, SpaceX only believes that
- 15:11it's a subset of 15% of their market.
- 15:13Remember, 85% is AI. So when you think
- 15:17about it, the company themselves don't
- 15:18really believe that. It's a bit of a
- 15:20shame that AI is now 85% of SpaceX's
- 15:23addressable market. This is essentially
- 15:25what investors are buying according to
- 15:27their own filings.
- 15:28>> [music]
- 15:28>> So, what will happen to the stock?
- 15:30Well, nobody really knows, but the
- 15:32general consensus is that it's going to
- 15:33rocket up as it launches. Then there'll
- 15:35be a slow grind downwards.
- 15:39SpaceX
- 15:39>> [music]
- 15:39>> was a genuine, world-class aerospace
- 15:42company with a profitable satellite
- 15:43internet business that had no
- 15:45competition. If these were normal days,
- 15:47they would have IPO'd on the basis of
- 15:48steady growth. They would have zero
- 15:50competition, so they could have jacked
- 15:52up their prices as much as they wanted.
- 15:54That should have been enough for
- 15:55investors. But everyone caught the AI
- 15:57bug, and now, for some reason, AI has to
- 16:00be 85% of their business.
- 16:02xAI is essentially a Trojan horse
- 16:05because in the prospectus, you have to
- 16:06scroll through 11 pages of rockets and
- 16:08talk of reaching the stars before you
- 16:10get to the financial details that reveal
- 16:12that the whole plan [music] is to float
- 16:13an AI company. Investors seem none the
- 16:16wiser.
- 16:17>> I heard last time they checked, it was
- 16:19like 200 something. They're probably
- 16:21going to go over to $500.
- 16:22>> 10 million?
- 16:23>> Hundreds of thousands of dollars.
- 16:25>> 35?
- 16:26>> Really? What is he selling? He's selling
- 16:28real estate on [music] Mars.
- 16:30>> The S&P 500 thankfully said no to this,
- 16:33but the Nasdaq said yes. So, look, who
- 16:35knows? I could be completely wrong. A
- 16:37rabbit could be pulled out of a hat, and
- 16:39SpaceX could rise to a hundred trillion
- 16:41dollar valuation in five years. But as
- 16:43for right now, it seems very [music]
- 16:45risky, and there's also a bad financial
- 16:47smell. Anyway, I'm done talking about
- 16:49it. I'm just going to get the popcorn.
- 16:51Right. So, thanks for watching. What do
- 16:53you guys think about the SpaceX IPO? Do
- 16:55you think things are going to go great
- 16:56and it's going to make a lot of money,
- 16:57or do you think it's just a quick,
- 16:59[music] panicked cash grab off the back
- 17:00of the AI boom? Let me know your
- 17:02thoughts in the comment section below.
- 17:04Feel free to subscribe if you liked it.
- 17:05[music] My name is Dagogo. You've been
- 17:07watching ColdFusion, and I'll catch you
- 17:09again soon for another episode. Cheers,
- 17:10[music] guys. Have a good one.
- 17:18>> [music]
- 17:23[music]
- 17:31[music]
- 17:41>> Cold fusion.
- 17:43It's me thinking.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of SpaceX Went Public - A Disaster Waiting to Happen by ColdFusion, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,177 words across 511 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.