Smarter Literature Review with NotebookLM (with Data Tables) — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Hello everyone. I'm pretty sure a lot of
- 0:02you have been using Notula M for
- 0:04different purposes, but in this video I
- 0:07will be showing you how you can use
- 0:08Notebook M to do better literature
- 0:10review. Let's go.
- 0:14[music]
- 0:20So, as usual, once we go into Nobel, the
- 0:23first thing we need to do is to create a
- 0:24new notebook. Let's create a new one.
- 0:27And you just drag all your sources in.
- 0:29Imagine I have all these seven articles
- 0:31about self uh regulated learning. So I'm
- 0:33going to put a title here.
- 0:34Self-regulated
- 0:36learning. Okay. What happened is Noah M
- 0:40will try to understand or summarize all
- 0:43these sources that we have identified.
- 0:45You can see everything is about
- 0:46self-regulated learning here. Now in
- 0:48literature view there are few things
- 0:50that we can do with um Noel M. Uh if you
- 0:53see the studio part here you have a few
- 0:55things but uh we only need to focus on
- 0:57two main uh studio tools. One is called
- 1:00report. If you click report here
- 1:03uh the default is briefing dog study
- 1:06guide and blog post but in our case
- 1:08because we want to do literature review
- 1:10we can wait until uh no bulim run is uh
- 1:14suggested format for us. We can go to
- 1:16literature review here or if you don't
- 1:19see this what you can do is click create
- 1:22your own and then you put in your uh
- 1:25instruction here for example uh
- 1:28literature review of the articles right
- 1:33focusing on you can kind of give your uh
- 1:36instruction here or the prompt here
- 1:38before you click generate I'm going to
- 1:40use the one suggested here you can see
- 1:42the suggested one synthesize the
- 1:44provided academic papers into
- 1:46comprehensive uh literature review
- 1:48because this one is suggested by uh
- 1:50Gemini on its own. You can see it's
- 1:52related to self-regulated learning SRR
- 1:55in Malaysian context. Okay, you can even
- 1:57say adopt a formal academic tone to
- 2:00provide scholarly overview. If you need
- 2:02this, you can just wait for uh GBI to
- 2:05suggest. So I'm going to click generate
- 2:07now. [snorts] So by [clears throat] now
- 2:10in the studio section, you will see the
- 2:11report is being generated. So while
- 2:13waiting for that to happen, I will show
- 2:15you another one called data table. Why
- 2:18do we need to use data table? You know
- 2:20the typical thing that we normally do in
- 2:22literature review or systematic
- 2:24literature review is to have an overview
- 2:26of what we have, right? And one of the
- 2:28best ways to do this is to of course put
- 2:31it in a table format or some people call
- 2:33it the matrix, the table matrix, right?
- 2:35by compartmentalizing
- 2:37all these uh key areas or key components
- 2:40of the literature of the or the
- 2:42articles. Right? So what you can do is
- 2:44click this one but don't click the data
- 2:48uh data table immediately. Click these
- 2:50uh the p pencil icon or the pen. Click
- 2:53on it and then you will see this uh
- 2:55language and of course you need to
- 2:57describe the table that you want. So I
- 2:59will put a make a table
- 3:03uh reviewing these articles
- 3:06according to this column. So you can say
- 3:11maybe you need authors title, maybe you
- 3:15also need to know the method,
- 3:18right? Maybe you need to know the key
- 3:20findings or you can also put
- 3:21implications and lastly maybe research
- 3:26uh gap. All right. So, just put the
- 3:28columns that you need here. All these
- 3:31columns will kind of help you to
- 3:34strategize the um the table format. Just
- 3:37click generate.
- 3:39Wait for it to happen. Uh usually it's
- 3:42very fast. If you click the data table
- 3:44directly, what happened was uh Gemini or
- 3:47no m will decide for you. All right?
- 3:49We'll decide on your behalf. I think
- 3:51sometimes better for us to set the
- 3:53structure right so that we don't um you
- 3:56know get things that we don't want.
- 3:57Okay. All right. See the table is ready
- 4:00now this one. So let me click you will
- 4:02see the table now right. Wonderful. All
- 4:05right. All this table is sorted
- 4:07correctly now. You can see authors and
- 4:10all this and then source ones and you
- 4:13know resource two. Amazing right? And if
- 4:17you like to verify, of course, you can
- 4:19always uh click all this and then verify
- 4:22uh whether it's true. But I have done a
- 4:24few of checking uh you know previously
- 4:27uh for the last few days and I noticed
- 4:29is really accurate in extracting the
- 4:31needed parts. What is probably causing
- 4:34some problem will be if the article did
- 4:37not mention any of this. For example,
- 4:38the article did not mention about
- 4:40research gap. um it will try to decide
- 4:43based on the way the research problem is
- 4:46worded. I think it's still fine because
- 4:48we get um we kind of get the you know
- 4:51bird's eye view of what's happening and
- 4:53it's easier for us to decide which
- 4:55article should we go deeper right so
- 4:58this is really really amazing of course
- 5:01if you need to uh show the prompt you
- 5:03can get the prompt again right let me go
- 5:06back to studio here if I were to do
- 5:09another table I will probably click data
- 5:11table again I will paste the prompt that
- 5:14I have just now and then I will add
- 5:16maybe a reference
- 5:20in APA7 edition. Let's try this, right?
- 5:23Let's try this. It's not really 100%
- 5:25accurate all the time, but when you do
- 5:27this, at least you also get the
- 5:28referencing. All right, so let's
- 5:31generate.
- 5:32While that is being generated, you can
- 5:34see the literature review is already
- 5:36done here, the report just now, and it's
- 5:39done in such a way. Okay? Right. So you
- 5:43can also see the uh the review done for
- 5:46you. Now I wouldn't say is that
- 5:49extensive yet but you get the skeleton,
- 5:51you get the draft and you can quickly
- 5:54you know expand based on your own
- 5:56understanding. Of course we don't have
- 5:57to rely fully on AI. This is just a
- 6:00draft for us to shape our thinking in
- 6:02terms of what we can do with our
- 6:04literature review. So I wouldn't suggest
- 6:06you to just copy blindly. In fact, you
- 6:08should not copy blindly. What you need
- 6:10to do is perhaps see the structure and
- 6:12any part that you feel is lacking, you
- 6:14can prompt further and then you probably
- 6:16add your own words inside. All right. So
- 6:18that is one way. Now even though now you
- 6:21have this function of export to doc let
- 6:24me try to export this to let you see it
- 6:27will export to document and this is how
- 6:29it looks like. Not really clean at the
- 6:31moment but it's good enough to have a
- 6:33Google doc version and then we can do
- 6:34the formatting uh later. All right. Um,
- 6:38of course, let's get back to the new
- 6:40table that we asked just now. You can
- 6:42see that the table is also including the
- 6:46APA uh referencing. But unfortunately,
- 6:49you will see how to put it. Uh there are
- 6:51some error here where you know all the
- 6:53sources seems to be unable to go through
- 6:56everything. All right. Partly because it
- 6:59could not extract some of the references
- 7:01here. So this is something that you have
- 7:03to be careful of when you request
- 7:05something from the paper and the paper
- 7:07doesn't seem to have adequate uh or
- 7:09enough information. It will you know it
- 7:11will not be able to provide accurate
- 7:13ones. If you compare this one just now
- 7:15with the one that I had earlier it's
- 7:17accurate because everything I asked for
- 7:19is there. Okay, that's something for you
- 7:21to pay attention to. But if you would
- 7:23like to export this, I kind of recommend
- 7:26you to also export it as table uh sorry
- 7:29uh sheets right to Google Sheets. If I
- 7:31do this, it will go to Google Sheets. So
- 7:33you can still have a good uh compilation
- 7:36of what you need in this format. Okay,
- 7:39so that's about all for how you can
- 7:41actually do better uh literature review
- 7:44using Notebook LM. Of course, there are
- 7:46other prompting techniques that we can
- 7:47do, but I'm just showing you the key
- 7:50features that you can maximize your
- 7:52literature review process. Uh, if you
- 7:55want to synthesize more and all that,
- 7:56that will require another prompting
- 7:58strategy. But in this video, the focus
- 8:01is more on the existing data table and
- 8:04also report features that you can use
- 8:06for your literature review. Happy
- 8:08trying.
- 8:17>> [music]
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Smarter Literature Review with NotebookLM (with Data Tables) by Chuah Kee Man, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,442 words across 202 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.