Sarah Paine: The Iran War and the Future of American Power | Interview — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00They have no idea what to do. Don't
- 0:02blame just Donald Trump because he's
- 0:04just one person. You have a superpower.
- 0:06You know what it is? It's shutting
- 0:08Hormuz and hostaging the whole world
- 0:10economy. It's going to be ugly. They've
- 0:11been destroying um oil infrastructure
- 0:14all over the Middle East, wrecked a
- 0:16number of US bases. And then he's going
- 0:18to throw some more bombs on on Iran. It
- 0:21won't make a difference. The collateral
- 0:23damage is mindblowing.
- 0:26It's global. Uh there are a lot of
- 0:28children who have been taken down in
- 0:29this war. All the children of Gaza. I
- 0:32think we're going to see nuclear
- 0:34proliferation as a result of the Ukraine
- 0:36war. Can't be a global power unless you
- 0:39have friends. We've lost our privileged
- 0:41position and Europe is going to become
- 0:43stronger. The problem is uh there are
- 0:46these faright basically fascist
- 0:49movements. All it's not just the United
- 0:51States. Europe has it as well. Bombing
- 0:54Iran is incapable of achieving that
- 0:56objective. I mean, you may want that
- 0:58objective, but it's not feasible.
- 1:03US is into a war with Iran. So, does it
- 1:06know how to get out?
- 1:09>> No. Next question.
- 1:12No, it's going to be Iran that decides
- 1:15under what terms ships are going to go
- 1:16through Hormuz. And what's interesting
- 1:18is that wasn't even a question before
- 1:21this war,
- 1:23right? And there was the
- 1:26agreement that was negotiated by the EU
- 1:29and the permanent members, all of them
- 1:32of the UN Security Council. So that
- 1:34includes us uh with the Obama
- 1:36administration. Everyone agreed to it,
- 1:38including Iran. And whatever's coming
- 1:40out now is just so inferior to that. And
- 1:42Trump dumped that one in his first
- 1:44administration. Said he was going to get
- 1:46something better. And the something
- 1:48better was this war. Okay,
- 1:52what a mess. It's called a pivotal error
- 1:56and it's causing inflation globally and
- 1:59uh what is it? We got shortages of
- 2:01fertilizer that has implications to not
- 2:03only prices but also whether people
- 2:05starve if they don't get enough
- 2:06fertilizer. And who knew what helium,
- 2:08right? Apparently you need helium to
- 2:10make computer chips.
- 2:12And these things weren't in question
- 2:15before this war.
- 2:17And what do you suppose the value of the
- 2:19object is for Iran in all of this?
- 2:22Right? We've talked about value of the
- 2:23object. How high do you suppose it is
- 2:25for them?
- 2:26>> Does US have an real iron strategy?
- 2:31>> No, there's no strategy
- 2:32>> or just a list of punishments.
- 2:34>> They have no idea what to do. You can
- 2:36watch it. Trump his tweets are
- 2:38hilarious. Oh, we're going to put fees
- 2:40on ships. No. Oh, no. We're not going to
- 2:42put
- 2:42>> So, this is only the list of
- 2:43punishments.
- 2:45I mean, and then he's going to throw
- 2:46some more bombs on on Iran. It won't
- 2:48make a difference and the war will keep
- 2:50going on. And then they say, "Oh, the
- 2:52war's over. The war never ended." When
- 2:54you're throwing when you're bombing each
- 2:57other, you're not having a ceasefire,
- 2:59right? Cease fire means no one's firing
- 3:01anything. If you're firing things, that
- 3:03means closed the stray to hormos, right?
- 3:07>> Who knows what the twisted logic is, but
- 3:09here's the the the incontrovertible
- 3:11story. Ships cannot freely go through
- 3:14the straight of Hormuz, right? And no
- 3:18one knows under what circumstances they
- 3:20will get sunk
- 3:22and or how much they have to pay Iran to
- 3:26get through, whether they will get
- 3:28through or won't get through. So maybe
- 3:31some ships do get through. Uh it's not
- 3:34um you're talking at massive cost. This
- 3:36is not uh the free flow of trade
- 3:38anymore. It's done. The question is uh
- 3:44uh under what terms Iran would agree not
- 3:48to stop sinking ships in and hormuz
- 3:53because they can easily do it right
- 3:55mines things from the shore
- 3:59and then um they're spreading the pain
- 4:01all over the Middle East by uh saying
- 4:05hey we can wreck anything you have there
- 4:07and now the United States is talking
- 4:08about moving things further out of the
- 4:10Middle East because we can't protect
- 4:11them.
- 4:12>> US killed Iran's supreme leader first
- 4:16day. So,
- 4:17>> what did they actually change?
- 4:19>> Well, hold on. It was more than that.
- 4:21Uh, so apparently Israel did the hit,
- 4:23but we combined the intelligence. I
- 4:25don't know the story, but so it kills
- 4:27the Supreme Leader. The current leader,
- 4:30his son, apparently suffered real
- 4:32wounds. His wife's dead. It's a
- 4:35sister-in-law and someone's a child.
- 4:37He's lost numerous family members and
- 4:40Iran has a revenge culture. It's just
- 4:42part of their culture which is if
- 4:44someone does unto you, you do exactly
- 4:47you do the same thing back, right? So,
- 4:50okay. And um they have long memories.
- 4:53So, uh boy, if it if since we've decided
- 4:56we can assassinate family family members
- 4:59down to small children,
- 5:01uh all of that's on the table probably.
- 5:04So by doing this
- 5:07uh who would do this? You're endangering
- 5:09all of your own children, your
- 5:11grandchildren's lives forever
- 5:14for having done this. And what does it
- 5:17solve? It's there was no question about
- 5:20uh the things going through the straight
- 5:22of Hormuz before this thing. And now
- 5:24we've told the Iranians, you have a
- 5:26superpower. You know what it is? It's
- 5:28shutting Hormuz and hostaging the whole
- 5:30whole world economy. They're never going
- 5:33to forget this.
- 5:34>> Nations spend fortunes protecting their
- 5:36secrets. Yet, most of us leave our own
- 5:39wide open.
- 5:40>> Right now, your address and phone number
- 5:43are probably for sale online everywhere.
- 5:46>> I Matt Kavitzki. You may know me as the
- 5:48host of this podcast, but I'm also a
- 5:51lawyer who helped implement GDPR in
- 5:54Poland. That's why protecting personal
- 5:56data matters to me. Data brokers trade
- 5:59this information and it can fuel AI
- 6:02scam, identity theft, even stalking.
- 6:05That's why this episode is sponsored by
- 6:07Incogn. I have been using the family
- 6:10unlimited plan which allows you to share
- 6:12your account with four additional family
- 6:15members. Here is our dashboard. Incogn
- 6:18sends removal requests to data brokers
- 6:21and follows up when they don't respond.
- 6:24We can see which requests are in
- 6:27progress, which are completed. Data can
- 6:30reappear. So, incogn.com/titw
- 6:41and use code titw for 60% of an annual
- 6:45plan. Two tools available exclusively on
- 6:48unlimited plans are the exposure scanner
- 6:52and the risk assessment. The exposure
- 6:54scanner finds when your personal
- 6:56information is exposed online so you can
- 6:59request custom removals. Risk assessment
- 7:01gives you a monthly privacy report with
- 7:04practical recommendations of how to
- 7:06protect your privacy. Again, visit
- 7:09incogn.com/tatw
- 7:11and use code TATW for 60% of an annual
- 7:15plan. Now, back to Sara.
- 7:18>> Does killing the man at the top ever
- 7:21kill the system?
- 7:22>> Uh, I don't believe so. And there's u
- 7:25there's another thing. So, if you're in
- 7:27a leader, so you haven't the other side
- 7:31has an an unlimited objective against
- 7:33you. They're going to personally kill
- 7:34you and all family members. Also, they
- 7:37aren't going to adhere to any deals
- 7:39because we've watched and from both
- 7:41sides cheat on deals. That's part of the
- 7:42problem. Um, so you can't ever assume
- 7:46they're not going to try to assassinate
- 7:48you, right? So, what is it going to make
- 7:50you do? You're going to play every card
- 7:52you have.
- 7:54It's going to be ugly. They've been
- 7:55destroying um oil infrastructure all
- 7:57over the Middle East. Uh they've
- 8:00apparently wrecked a number of US bases.
- 8:04Uh the United States um has monitoring
- 8:09facilities and radars and things uh to
- 8:14keep track of what's going on and
- 8:16they've destroyed loads of these things.
- 8:18Oh yeah, and then we've just been
- 8:19incredibly wasteful on how we're using
- 8:21the Patriot missiles because we're oh so
- 8:24arrogant. This is Major Hegth who's
- 8:26running the department of the beardless
- 8:28department of war that's going to make
- 8:29America great again. And now he's going
- 8:31to measure testosterone levels to see if
- 8:33that's the problem. Who knows? But um so
- 8:37you got him
- 8:39uh thinking, how is this? It's it's made
- 8:43our situation so much worse. And there's
- 8:47big ships can indeed close narrow seas.
- 8:50They cannot open them. So he thinks he's
- 8:52going to open the straight of Hormuz.
- 8:54What are you going to do? Convoy? You're
- 8:55going to lose a lot of ships on convoys.
- 8:57Go study the Battle of Atlantic. A lot
- 8:58of merchant shipping and convoy ships
- 9:00went down. It wasn't We did win the
- 9:03Battle of Atlantic, but it wasn't cheap
- 9:04and it went on a long time.
- 9:06>> What would victory over Iran actually
- 9:09mean?
- 9:12Well, I think what they thought was that
- 9:16uh you want them to stop doing what you
- 9:19consider to be a malign things of
- 9:22destabilizing parts of uh the Middle
- 9:24East and uh wanting to uh destroy
- 9:28Israel. But uh bombing Iran is incapable
- 9:32of achieving that objective. I mean you
- 9:34may want that objective but it's not
- 9:36feasible. There are certain things in
- 9:39this world. You may want them all. You
- 9:41may we may want everyone to be
- 9:43billionaires. It's not feasible.
- 9:45So, uh, wanting Iran not to hate you,
- 9:50uh, that's probably not feasible. And if
- 9:52you bomb them, they probably are, it's
- 9:54not going to be they're going to hate
- 9:55you less, they're probably going to hate
- 9:56you more. So, it's choosing a militarily
- 10:01uh, well, just an unfeasible objective.
- 10:04And uh the collateral damage is
- 10:07mindblowing.
- 10:09It's global. And this is entirely the
- 10:11fault of the Republican party of the
- 10:14United States. And I haven't been
- 10:15partisan in my life. I've never seen uh
- 10:19Americans be this incompetent in my
- 10:21entire life where uh it's the
- 10:25Republicans own the judiciary, the
- 10:27legislative branch, and the White House,
- 10:30and Trump wants to put in incompetent
- 10:33appointees, and they could have denied
- 10:35him these people like Hegathth, who is
- 10:37historically not qualified for the job.
- 10:40Put him in anyway, and then you get
- 10:42these consequences. They own it. Is the
- 10:44West romantizing
- 10:46a democratic Iran?
- 10:48>> No. No, don't. The West isn't
- 10:50romanticizing anything. I think
- 10:52Europeans are looking at this and
- 10:53they're appalled. This is one of the
- 10:56stupidest things the United States has
- 10:57ever come up with.
- 10:58>> Would the regime's collapse bring
- 11:00democracy or chaos?
- 11:02>> Probably chaos. But no, no, it's a
- 11:06democracy.
- 11:07Again, you know, in Poland, it's the
- 11:09work of centuries.
- 11:11It takes a it takes habits of mind,
- 11:14right, of how you treat each other, how
- 11:16you settle differences. Do you settle
- 11:18differences by killing someone really
- 11:19fast? Can Iran ever trust a deal with us
- 11:23again?
- 11:25>> Uh, I don't think anyone trusts anything
- 11:27with this administration. We don't
- 11:28enforce the laws of the land in our own
- 11:30country, let alone things with other
- 11:31people. I mean, we're violating the
- 11:34terms of our constitution. It's
- 11:37incredible what's going on. We have
- 11:40It's mind-blowing the the uh the rules
- 11:42that are being broken. And again, the
- 11:45Republican Party of the United States
- 11:47owns this.
- 11:49>> It's entirely their fault.
- 11:51>> The question is,
- 11:52>> don't blame just Donald Trump because
- 11:54he's just one person even though he
- 11:56comes with a really um pernitious
- 11:58family.
- 11:59>> The question is also if the US can trust
- 12:02deal with the Iran.
- 12:03>> No, I don't think so. But see what what
- 12:06the Obama it was the EU the five
- 12:09permanent members of the of the UN that
- 12:11means Russia, China and the United
- 12:13States were all on board along with
- 12:14England and France uh EU and Iran with
- 12:18the Obama uh deal and what that one had
- 12:22all sorts of things Iran needed to do
- 12:25and then it had inspections and it was
- 12:28going to reduce sanctions in tandem with
- 12:31the inspections going well and did it
- 12:34solve Iran? No. But compared to what's
- 12:38going on now, it was a bargain. And
- 12:40understand, it's what's feasible and
- 12:43what's not. It's really important. All
- 12:45right. Here's another concept. Situation
- 12:47versus um a problem. A problem you can
- 12:50solve. A situation uh lacks a feasible
- 12:54solution. So if there is no feasible
- 12:56solution, you need to manage it. And so
- 12:58the United States is trying to treat a
- 13:00country of 90 million people, which is
- 13:02Iran, like a something you can solve.
- 13:05You can't. You have to manage it. And
- 13:07China is even more so at 1.4 billion.
- 13:09Don't try solving China. It won't work.
- 13:11Well,
- 13:12>> Iran's process collapse and its leader
- 13:15is dead. Yet the regime still stands. So
- 13:17what actually holds it up?
- 13:20>> I don't know. I'm not an expert on Iran,
- 13:22but uh presumably the current theocracy
- 13:25that's there has got a very robust um
- 13:28connections with intelligence and army
- 13:30and and we've seen them. They they shoot
- 13:32anyone who gets in their way. It's a
- 13:34reprehensible regime, but um it's
- 13:38clearly uh quite well entrenched in
- 13:40power.
- 13:41>> What's about Israel? What seats the
- 13:44limits of this war? I I mean that isn't
- 13:48that the problem with Israel would like
- 13:50to have people trying to
- 13:54it's had neighbors who historically want
- 13:56to erase it right and not allow it to
- 13:59exist as a state and Israelis for
- 14:02excellent reasons find that intolerable
- 14:05but again changing what other people
- 14:07think uh it's a question of whether
- 14:09Israel's military means actually change
- 14:13what they think or they make them think
- 14:15it even more deeply.
- 14:16Does Israel think this war is finished?
- 14:20>> I have no idea about Israel, what Israel
- 14:22thinks. Truly, I have no expertise on
- 14:25Israel whatsoever. But um the ru the war
- 14:27is boomeranging because it never used to
- 14:30be in the United States a US uh a
- 14:33support for Israel was just
- 14:34unquestioning for decades and decades
- 14:36and decades. Now it's very much
- 14:38questioned. This is uh this is new.
- 14:42>> Watching who gets bump and who doesn't.
- 14:44Well, it's it has to do with killing all
- 14:46sorts of uh there are a lot of children
- 14:49who've been taken down in this war. All
- 14:52the children of Gaza and trying to do um
- 14:55an ethnic cleanse in Gaza. It's awful.
- 14:59>> Who wouldn't every country want
- 15:02a nuclear weapon?
- 15:04>> I I think we're going to see nuclear
- 15:06proliferation as a result of the Ukraine
- 15:08war. And uh yeah, that if you have one,
- 15:12people like North Korea, people aren't
- 15:14invading North Korea even though it's a
- 15:17smaller place cuz they have a nuclear
- 15:19weapon. It's like why would you invade
- 15:20there? It's called leave them alone. Let
- 15:22them live their own miserable lives.
- 15:23They want to be miserable. Have fun. Go
- 15:25enjoy being North Korean.
- 15:27>> US defense Europe, Japan, Korea, Taiwan,
- 15:33Israel, and the Gulf at once. So what's
- 15:39happened on the day two wars start
- 15:42together?
- 15:43>> Wait a second. So what why did you list
- 15:45all those places? What do they have in
- 15:47common?
- 15:47>> This the list of you know uh the places
- 15:51protected by the United States.
- 15:53>> Okay. Well, um I think the protections
- 15:56haven't been good enough for people in
- 15:58the Middle East, right? I mean, I I
- 16:01think if you're in the United Arab
- 16:04Emirates or Bahrain or Kuwait, you're
- 16:06going this isn't quite enough.
- 16:08>> Which promise does American break first?
- 16:11>> But the Trump breaks all promises.
- 16:14That's what's wrong with him. He doesn't
- 16:16follow any rules. He's profoundly
- 16:19dangerous to the United States. He's
- 16:22also incompetent. And the reason I I'm
- 16:24choosing my words carefully, look at how
- 16:27this world war plays out. It is
- 16:29incompetent.
- 16:31General Mattis and General Kelly, who
- 16:34worked for the first Trump
- 16:35administration, there's no way on this
- 16:37planet that they would have uh uh
- 16:40allowed this war to go on. There would
- 16:42have been some really highprofile
- 16:44resignation or something going on,
- 16:46putting enormous pressure of don't do
- 16:48this.
- 16:49But hey, we got Major Hegsth who doesn't
- 16:52know he's gonna the guy who's good on
- 16:54cutting beards. Which US is the
- 16:59exception? The super power of the last
- 17:04eight years or the quiet republic of the
- 17:09150 years before Americans would have
- 17:12preferred the former. Um but after World
- 17:16War I and World War II, I think the
- 17:18conclusion was that if you don't deal
- 17:20with problems far away, they come get
- 17:22you at home. No, we're having a crisis
- 17:25in democracy in the United States right
- 17:27now where we have a party in power of
- 17:30the Republicans who are trying to change
- 17:33gerrymandering. They're trying to change
- 17:35uh all all the electoral rules and how
- 17:38they're going to count votes to
- 17:39guarantee that they win. Not an actual
- 17:42majority, but whatever gets counted
- 17:45there. And they're trying to rig the the
- 17:47uh elections.
- 17:49And it's
- 17:52uh it's unbelievable what's going on.
- 17:55>> America first was a real move movement.
- 17:58Who were they?
- 18:00>> I don't know. I know about the the
- 18:02America Firsters that I know about
- 18:04because I'm not an American historian.
- 18:06The ones I know about are uh come into
- 18:09play in the 1930s.
- 18:12And that group uh was going back to this
- 18:15isolationist tradition and saying look
- 18:18let's just forget about these other
- 18:19problems and they're playing halfcourt
- 18:22tennis and they're talking about we need
- 18:24to save the US economy in the Great
- 18:26Depression and they think the solution
- 18:28is we do tariffs and of course if you
- 18:31realize well what do you suppose the
- 18:32other side's going to do? You suppose
- 18:33they're going to sit there and just pay
- 18:34the tariffs? No. They're going to do the
- 18:37same thing to you and then you're going
- 18:39to ruin trade globally. Brilliant. Not.
- 18:43It doesn't work. It's a bad strategy.
- 18:46And we're trying it again. It's a bad
- 18:47strategy.
- 18:48>> And what killed it?
- 18:50>> What killed it?
- 18:51>> Yeah.
- 18:52>> Uh the Great Depression and then World
- 18:55War II
- 18:56because uh when you do the tariff war,
- 18:59you're making people desperate globally,
- 19:03right? If they're already desperate
- 19:04because of the depression, you're making
- 19:06the depression worse. So you got people
- 19:07who are much poorer than you are, so
- 19:09they're more desperate. And then they're
- 19:10going to tend. These are hot house
- 19:12conditions for dictators like Hitler to
- 19:13come to power and or the Japanese
- 19:15militarists.
- 19:16>> So what brought the argument back? Oh,
- 19:20um the argument back I think after it's
- 19:23again this brilliant generation that
- 19:24lived through it and they're analyzing
- 19:26like what happened and it's a conclusion
- 19:30that you know we need to work together
- 19:33and that actually if we make instead of
- 19:37people like now like to talk about as
- 19:39sacrifices like I'm giving things up no
- 19:41making major investments in each other
- 19:44instead of looking at as sacrifices as
- 19:46investments uh we're all going to
- 19:48prosper together it's going to be this
- 19:49massive win-win and it was this is the
- 19:52inner war period. They they set the
- 19:54institutional foundation so it could
- 19:56happen. This brilliant group of people
- 19:59and then the question is do people
- 20:00require searing life experience in order
- 20:03to become wise? Do we require uh Ukraine
- 20:07style warfare on each of our home
- 20:09countries for us to become wise? Well,
- 20:11if that's the case, probably won't
- 20:13survive because we'll get a nuclear war
- 20:14and that'll be it. Has America ever been
- 20:17this divided and still run a foreign
- 20:21policy?
- 20:24>> Well, yeah, but you're talking about uh
- 20:26we've been divided um all sorts of times
- 20:29and we were divided in the McCarthy era.
- 20:31We were divided through the Vietnam War,
- 20:33but what's different is um there were
- 20:35agreement on both parties to play by the
- 20:38electoral rules. and um when you lost an
- 20:42election, you uh congratulated the
- 20:44winner and you said um you know, I'll
- 20:47run the next time. Whereas you have
- 20:49Trump denying he lost the first
- 20:50election. He won't show up at Biden's
- 20:52inauguration. Who does that, right?
- 20:56Americans love to play sports, right?
- 20:58And part of sports is sportsmanship,
- 21:01right? Um so your football team loses,
- 21:03what are you going to do? go run off the
- 21:05the field and go, I don't know, I'll
- 21:08never play again. What is this?
- 21:10>> Who do allies do while America argues
- 21:14with itself?
- 21:16>> What are they doing? They're organizing.
- 21:18They're organizing without the United
- 21:20States. I've told you we're going to
- 21:21lose our privile we've lost our
- 21:23privilege uh position in the
- 21:25international system. And Europe is
- 21:27going to become stronger as it organizes
- 21:30because it has to. It's facing an
- 21:31existential threat with Putin. the guy
- 21:34um is busy destabilizing everybody uh
- 21:37blowing up warehouses and doing all
- 21:39sorts of crazy stuff. Who needs this?
- 21:41>> What's about Europe? Europe talks about
- 21:43strategic autonomy but US general steel
- 21:48command NATO. So it's Europe a power or
- 21:52protectorate a little bit for United
- 21:55States.
- 21:56>> Well, these institutions are in flux. So
- 22:00um that's why I'm telling you to watch
- 22:01elections in the United States. Is this
- 22:02a long-term thing? Is this what the
- 22:04United States is becoming? A malign uh
- 22:07continental power where you've got a
- 22:09grifter class that can u monopolize all
- 22:12the money for themselves and uh do
- 22:15whatever. Is that what the United States
- 22:16is? And oh, by the way, we're killing
- 22:18off our scientific research by fooling
- 22:20around with federal funding on grants
- 22:23and we want to politicize that. Uh the
- 22:25United States was a great power uh a
- 22:29great economic power in large part. It
- 22:31has to do with being at the head of
- 22:32technologies. Well, if you get rid of
- 22:34all your scientists, you won't be at the
- 22:36head of anything. But it we'll see
- 22:38whether these things um continue or not.
- 22:42But currently where the United States is
- 22:44in um on its national suicide. I I quote
- 22:48this guy many times. Uh it's uh Toinby
- 22:52who was a very fine British historian of
- 22:55the west of the 20th century who said
- 22:56civilizations do not die by murder like
- 22:59other people killing them but by
- 23:01suicide. It's all the stupid stuff they
- 23:03do. Well, we're deep into stupid stuff
- 23:05in the United States right now.
- 23:07>> What would Europe have to give up to
- 23:10grow up? Poland is example of growth,
- 23:14but not Europe itself. Well, isn't um
- 23:17the story is that uh the Baltic states,
- 23:23what is it? It's the Baltic Nordic a are
- 23:26some very thoughtful members of Europe.
- 23:29I I also suspect it the Dutch are as
- 23:32well, the Netherlands, uh Poland and uh
- 23:36nuclear weapon.
- 23:38>> No, no, I'm talking about people who are
- 23:39thinking deeply about what the security
- 23:41architecture needs to be. in Germany has
- 23:44gotten on board more recently of
- 23:46starting to think whoa uh okay um and
- 23:49thinking what's going to go forward and
- 23:52you have ample people to do this and oh
- 23:54Germany is liberated in the sense that
- 23:58in the 20th century Germany couldn't be
- 24:00at the forefront of foreign policy
- 24:02because of World War II right it wore
- 24:05the crown of infamy well Vladimir Putin
- 24:08has taken the crown of infamy and
- 24:10Russians shall wear it going forward
- 24:12this frees up Germany to take a leading
- 24:14role.
- 24:15>> Why Europe is so addicted to United
- 24:17States? Because you know France has
- 24:19nuclear weapon it made sure and Germany
- 24:22has money it made spent. So why is
- 24:25Europe's defense still made in US
- 24:29>> but wait you're talking about uh the
- 24:30United States uh went uh rogue very
- 24:33recently and so it takes time to change
- 24:37around your investments. It's very
- 24:39recent uh that deciding uh the really
- 24:44crazy decisions have come in the second
- 24:46Trump administration, not the first one.
- 24:48In the first one, there were some they
- 24:50were his cabinet appointments were not
- 24:53univer uniformly incompetent. Now we got
- 24:55a whole bunch of incompetent people in
- 24:57the cabinet who truly don't know what
- 24:59they're doing. It's the rest the
- 25:01Rasputin have taken over the cabinet.
- 25:05Uh, and so it's going to take Europe a
- 25:08time. It'll be over the next decade
- 25:10where you'll see massive changes.
- 25:12>> Could a European
- 25:14army ever agree on whom to fight?
- 25:19>> I have no idea. But I think the story is
- 25:20you don't want to be fighting, but you
- 25:22want to um have uh fine enough air
- 25:25defenses and other things uh in order to
- 25:28protect yourself from Russia, right?
- 25:30China's a long way away. I mean, what
- 25:32China's going to do to you is probably
- 25:33nothing. I mean, you'll be squabbling
- 25:35about things. So, it's Russia military
- 25:37defenses for that. And then you're going
- 25:39to be using non-military instruments of
- 25:42power to deal with others. That's where
- 25:44sanctions are important because if you
- 25:46have someone who just cannot behave, you
- 25:49give them a timeout from the world order
- 25:50and say you can't trade with us on equal
- 25:52terms and then the compounding effects
- 25:56of bad choices ruin them long term. Do
- 26:00you really believe that American
- 26:02soldiers would really die for war? So,
- 26:06>> well actually a lot of American soldiers
- 26:08died to build democracy. That's what
- 26:11they thought. I had the students in my
- 26:13class uh for Afghanistan
- 26:16and Iraq. So, but we aren't there now.
- 26:20And and there was um a an issue with
- 26:25those two countries. They didn't um pass
- 26:28what I call the son-in-law test. And the
- 26:31son-in-law test is if you send your
- 26:33troops to wherever
- 26:35uh will and they want to marry some of
- 26:38the
- 26:38>> local
- 26:39>> troops troops troops if you send them
- 26:41wherever and they're fighting wherever.
- 26:43Well, the people in the country in
- 26:45question welcome them as son-in-laws if
- 26:48they marry their daughters.
- 26:50uh many US servicemen who went to Japan,
- 26:53Korea, Vietnam, they brought back wives,
- 26:57right? All over Europe, you know this, I
- 27:00mean just all kinds of people married,
- 27:02but not in Iraq and not in Afghanistan.
- 27:05So those two places don't fall uh pass
- 27:08the uh in-law test, which is a a problem
- 27:11for of us even being involved there
- 27:13deeply. How does a country like Poland
- 27:17make sure of it
- 27:18>> of the United States? Well, you aren't
- 27:20sure of it. That's the problem right
- 27:22now, isn't it? Uh, no one's sure of it.
- 27:24I'm American and I don't know what's
- 27:26going on in Washington. It seems crazy.
- 27:28I mean, really, we we're arguing about a
- 27:30reflecting pool.
- 27:31>> So, from the another side, should Poland
- 27:35have its own nuclear weapons?
- 27:39>> Um, it's not a question of should. I
- 27:42think the story is if trends continue
- 27:44Poland will
- 27:46or Germany will somebody will uh that uh
- 27:49Europe uh will have robust nuclear
- 27:52weapons if things don't sort themselves
- 27:55out for precisely the reasons it's not
- 27:58should it's just if this is the world
- 28:00that we're in and Europe has the
- 28:02technology to do it it's expensive but
- 28:04you have the ability
- 28:05>> Germany's rearming should Poland
- 28:08celebrate or worry
- 28:11>> are you going to need Germany to rearm.
- 28:13What are you going to make it as Poland
- 28:14by yourself? But I think the problem is
- 28:18uh there are these faright basically
- 28:21fascist movements all it's not just the
- 28:23United States. Europe has it as well.
- 28:26It's very important uh that they do not
- 28:29take power and because they'll ruin
- 28:32their own countries.
- 28:33>> Poland spends more of its economy on
- 28:36defense than US does.
- 28:39>> Percentage. Yeah.
- 28:40>> Yeah. So is the student overtaking the
- 28:43teacher?
- 28:43>> Well, Bismar said that fools, idiots,
- 28:46and drunk fools drunkards in the United
- 28:49States. But uh Charles de Gaulle had
- 28:51another comment about the United States.
- 28:53If only we had that anyone with that
- 28:55kind of strategic location. We have
- 28:57these huge oceans. No one can get to it.
- 28:59Isn't that great? Except um our security
- 29:02paradigm only works as long as Mexico
- 29:05and Canada are friends. And why we're
- 29:07being so nasty to them, I will never
- 29:10understand.
- 29:12>> Can America stay a global power if
- 29:14Americans no longer want to pay for
- 29:16this?
- 29:18>> No. But it's also you can't be a global
- 29:20power
- 29:22uh unless you have friends.
- 29:24>> Friends?
- 29:25>> Yeah. You can't be a global power. How
- 29:27are you going to be global? Why is the
- 29:28United States You think the United
- 29:30States is a global power? Well, doesn't
- 29:31it have basing all over the world? And
- 29:34these people quite often invite us to
- 29:36have bases, right? And many of them like
- 29:38in Europe complaining about us
- 29:39threatening to pull people out of bases,
- 29:41right? It's not like complaining like
- 29:43would you would you want Russia to do a
- 29:45base in Poland? How likely would that
- 29:48be? Zero.
- 29:48>> Zero.
- 29:49>> Right? But in the United States, there
- 29:51was a thought of people benefiting from
- 29:53this system. So um Americans
- 29:58uh the United States is a global power
- 30:00to the extent that other people accept
- 30:02it as such and find it to be a winwin.
- 30:05>> So what replaces American leadership if
- 30:08America stepped back. Well, but the
- 30:13greatest generation built a really
- 30:15important set of institutions because
- 30:17after World War II there were hardly any
- 30:19institutions now. And then what has been
- 30:22built since then is very extensive set
- 30:24of institutions where um the medium
- 30:27powers have more than enough ability to
- 30:29use these institutions to organize
- 30:32things the way they want to organize
- 30:34things. And the world is mostly
- 30:36medium-sized powers. So go have at it.
- 30:38Make a better world order. Truman tried
- 30:41to buy Greenland in 1946.
- 30:44>> Oh, what? How did that work? He must
- 30:46have proposed it. And then I'm presuming
- 30:48Denmark said no.
- 30:49>> So why does that island keep tempting
- 30:53Americans?
- 30:54>> Oh, this is just Trump, but he's a
- 30:55continentalist. He wants to have
- 30:56territory. I have no idea. He thinks
- 30:58he's got a mineral deal for his
- 31:00reprehensible family.
- 31:02>> Is the Arctic the next front line?
- 31:04>> I have no idea what they're trying to
- 31:06do. Um, the man is scenile.
- 31:09um and uh he's not fit for office. Look,
- 31:14you've never seen any world leader
- 31:16behave the way he is, who the way he's
- 31:18he's behaving. None of it makes any
- 31:20sense.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Sarah Paine: The Iran War and the Future of American Power | Interview by This Is The World, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 5,048 words across 775 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.