Sarah Knafo sur France Info : Quelle neutralité sur le service public ! — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00It's 6:39 PM and we're going to welcome
- 0:02our first guest of the evening right
- 0:05now. She just returned from the summer
- 0:07university of Reconquête, Éric
- 0:08Zemmour's party, where she serves as
- 0:10number two. Good evening, Sarah Knafo.
- 0:12Good evening.
- 0:12Welcome to the set. Thank you for being
- 0:15with us. Tonight, we'll watch a short
- 0:16piece on the summer university, and
- 0:18then we have plenty of questions for
- 0:19you.
- 0:20Perfect.
- 0:23A political comeback when everything
- 0:26looks like a departure; Reconquête is
- 0:28at 0.7%. In the last legislative
- 0:31elections, no deputies or senators in
- 0:33Parliament, only one MEP after an
- 0:35internal implosion with the departure
- 0:37of Marion Maréchal-Le Pen. So, we
- 0:39asked the activists present why they
- 0:41still persist in adhering to this party
- 0:44. When there is a big ditch like this
- 0:47that you have to cross, you take
- 0:49momentum, you jump, and then you move
- 0:50forward. 1%, 1.7, 8, 10, that doesn't
- 0:53mean anything.
- 0:54Éric Zemmour's loyalists stayed, they
- 0:56will stay because there is a
- 0:58fundamental movement here, and we can
- 1:00really feel it.
- 1:00For me, it is essential that he allies
- 1:02himself with others.
- 1:04A brief crowd walk for party president
- 1:06Éric Zemmour, who refused to grant us
- 1:08an interview. So we tried a question on
- 1:11the fly.
- 1:12Mr. Zemmour, what future for the party
- 1:14after you? There will, alas, be no "
- 1:17after." Reconquête officially claims
- 1:19100,000 members and supporters in
- 1:21France, 7,000 in the Vaucluse, but its
- 1:23political weight has never seemed so
- 1:25light. So, reconquest yes, but above
- 1:28all from the far-right electorate to
- 1:30avoid disappearing.
- 1:31find
- 1:33So we have plenty of questions to ask
- 1:35you. We're going to talk about
- 1:36Reconquête, we're going to talk about
- 1:38the day's current events; first, why do
- 1:39you refuse to answer journalists '
- 1:40questions?
- 1:41We'll say a word about the report.
- 1:43First thing, it's fortunate that we
- 1:44have real French people to
- 1:46counterbalance the public service
- 1:47commentary a bit because, regarding the
- 1:49twilight commentary, frankly, we've
- 1:51seen more neutral. As for the people
- 1:52who answered you, I think that is what
- 1:54is truly interesting in this report.
- 1:56Indeed, there is a fundamental movement
- 1:58, meaning French people who are
- 2:00increasingly a majority in agreeing
- 2:02with us on our themes, on our themes on
- 2:04the economy, on school, against wokeism
- 2:06. That is growing more and more. You
- 2:08speak of the legislative score; you are
- 2:10perfectly right. You did indeed get 0.7
- 2:12%.
- 2:13You've already said it; if you want, we
- 2:14can repeat it several times.
- 2:15No, because—no, but you are calling
- 2:16our subject into question. So what
- 2:17exactly are you calling into question?
- 2:19Here is the whole commentary if you
- 2:20like. Fortunately, there were French
- 2:21people who expressed themselves. As for
- 2:22the legislative results, we can sum it
- 2:24up in one word: a phenomenon called
- 2:25tactical voting occurred. Meaning that
- 2:27people all believed—and there were
- 2:29many of us, surely you on this set as
- 2:31well—that Jordan Bardella was going
- 2:33to win. Consequently, our voters went
- 2:35to vote for him, thinking they were
- 2:36participating in a popular momentum. We
- 2:38believed in it, we hoped for it. I
- 2:39myself hoped for it. That phenomenon
- 2:41happened. Now, if you look at political
- 2:43life, we have seen many parties that
- 2:45started out very weak. I remind you
- 2:47that we have been in existence for 2
- 2:48years. Reconquête is a 2-year-old
- 2:50child, if you will, that is currently
- 2:51growing. We have seen many parties that
- 2:53started very low. I’ll give you an
- 2:54example. Meloni in Italy four years ago
- 2:56was at 2%. Today, she is the Prime
- 2:58Minister of Italy.
- 2:59Uh.
- 2:59So, if you start low, well, we would
- 3:01have liked to succeed on the first try
- 3:03like everyone else. But it teaches us
- 3:05humility; it teaches us to know the
- 3:07French people better. I’m still going
- 3:09to give you some figures that I don’t
- 3:10think you’ll like, but which exist
- 3:12and show that you aren't really growing
- 3:14. You are actually shrinking since four
- 3:16of your five elected officials in the
- 3:19European Parliament have left you, and
- 3:21last week, your only senator, Stéphane
- 3:24Ravier, left you as well. So, we are
- 3:26looking at a hemorrhage here, not
- 3:27growth.
- 3:28Well, you already said that in your
- 3:29segment, so we can start over if you
- 3:31want. What is growing, if you will, is
- 3:34the weight we have on the ideas of this
- 3:36country. I think no one, not even you,
- 3:38not even public service,
- 3:39Why is everyone leaving you then, if
- 3:41you are so powerful?
- 3:42Did you see what happened during the
- 3:43legislative elections? People believed
- 3:45Jordan Bardella was going to win. Some
- 3:47thought to themselves,
- 3:48you already said that yourself, too.
- 3:49Very well. And so now, I will even add
- 3:51to what I said earlier. Some thought
- 3:53that if they left the ship now, they
- 3:54might get a ministerial position.
- 3:57Unfortunately for them, it didn't go as
- 3:59planned, and those petty ambitions
- 4:00So, Stan Ravier left because he hopes
- 4:02to join the government, or did I dream
- 4:05that question up?
- 4:06I also spoke about Ste last week. The
- 4:07latest one. Do you want me to answer
- 4:09chronologically? Should I answer
- 4:10everything at once, all the questions?
- 4:12Answer the questions I'm asking. Well,
- 4:13if you don't interrupt me, maybe I
- 4:14could even finish.
- 4:15Go ahead, go ahead.
- 4:16So the question was about...
- 4:18So some left precisely because they
- 4:19imagined they would be able to become
- 4:21ministers. Now, I would like us to look
- 4:24at this with a little more perspective
- 4:26and not just over the last three months
- 4:28. I would like us to analyze the
- 4:29situation of Reconquête from a broader
- 4:31horizon. If you want, if I look at the
- 4:33situation of France in 10 years, I
- 4:35don't think people will remember that
- 4:36Reconquête got a low score in an
- 4:38election in June 2024. I think they
- 4:40will remember instead that Reconquête
- 4:42stood with those who warned the French
- 4:43people.
- 4:44All right. Well, that's speculation.
- 4:45We'll talk about that again in 10 years
- 4:47. Today, we are here to talk about
- 4:48today. That is what is most important,
- 4:50if you like; it is the history of
- 4:51France. It is what awaits us. It is the
- 4:52future of our children. Maybe that
- 4:53doesn't excite you here. What interests
- 4:55us is the present, because in 10 years,
- 4:57I don't think anyone can really say
- 4:59what will happen more than what
- 5:00happened 3 days ago. I think what is
- 5:02interesting is the country we will
- 5:04leave to our children, and for me, if
- 5:05you want, I won't be ashamed in 10
- 5:06years of having belonged to this party
- 5:08and even having created it alongside
- 5:09Éric Zemmour. I won't be ashamed of
- 5:11having stayed, even if we have known
- 5:13defeats. I won't be ashamed of
- 5:15continuing to fight because I think we
- 5:16are on the side of those who became
- 5:18aware of the dangers threatening our
- 5:20people and that we are part of those
- 5:21who are precisely trying to fight
- 5:23against that. I think that in 10 years,
- 5:25it won't be for us to be ashamed, but
- 5:26for many other people, many other
- 5:28people who let our country die, you see
- 5:30, who let the country sink to where it
- 5:31is today. Do you have questions to ask?
- 5:34I wanted to know your take on the
- 5:35appointment of Michel Barnier.
- 5:37Apparently, there is talk of a ministry
- 5:40of immigration, a program, and then
- 5:43statements by Michel Barnier that were
- 5:45quite, how should I say...not radical,
- 5:50but in any case, it was going, a priori
- 5:52, in the direction you defend. Do you
- 5:55think that is good news? Do you have a
- 5:58positive outlook? A follow-up question:
- 6:01for the next election, if in a year
- 6:03there is a sudden dissolution again,
- 6:06will Reconquête present candidates
- 6:09under its own banner everywhere?
- 6:11Thank you for your questions, which are
- 6:13a bit neutral. I will answer the last
- 6:14one first, then move on to what you
- 6:16asked me at the beginning. Yes,
- 6:17Reconquête will be present for the
- 6:19next elections. We hear a lot about
- 6:21proportional representation being
- 6:22implemented. So, I think, at least the
- 6:24first estimates currently give us 26
- 6:26elected officials. It is a work in
- 6:27progress with proportional
- 6:28representation.
- 6:28With proportional representation.
- 6:29Indeed,
- 6:30not quite done yet.
- 6:31I think it will be done, given it is
- 6:32one of Marine Le Pen's conditions for
- 6:34accepting Michel Barnier's nomination.
- 6:35I think it will work, but I don't want
- 6:37to make predictions. I think there will
- 6:38be proportional representation. So yes,
- 6:40we will be present everywhere in France
- 6:41. That is what we are working on. It is
- 6:43exactly what we announced at our summer
- 6:44university: local establishment. Now, I
- 6:46will answer your first question about
- 6:48Michel Barnier. You cited promises he
- 6:50indeed made in 2021. He said he would
- 6:52revisit birthright citizenship. All of
- 6:54that suits me perfectly. The abolition
- 6:56of the AME suits me perfectly. I was
- 6:58saying earlier that we have had a major
- 6:59impact on the battle of ideas. I would
- 7:01like to remind you that in 2021, when
- 7:02Michel Barnier made his promises, we
- 7:04were in the middle of the Republicans'
- 7:05primary, and it is exactly when Éric
- 7:07Zemmour was skyrocketing in the polls.
- 7:09He went from 1%to 18%in the span of two
- 7:11months. And it was at that moment that
- 7:13all the Republicans started aligning
- 7:14themselves. In fact, I remember a
- 7:15France Info segment that talked about
- 7:17the "Zemmour-ization" of the
- 7:19Republicans. France,
- 7:20no, not at all. On the contrary, at the
- 7:21time, it was true. The "Zemmour-ization
- 7:23" of the Republicans. And so, at that
- 7:24moment, Michel Barnier made his
- 7:26campaign promises. What I want to say
- 7:28to the people listening is that we
- 7:30aren't forced to naively believe every
- 7:32campaign promise. We've been through
- 7:34that too many times already. The
- 7:35Republicans have done it to us many
- 7:36times. I think some people here have
- 7:38memories like I do. The Republicans
- 7:40have pulled that trick on us a lot.
- 7:41They promised us a Ministry of National
- 7:43Identity. Has our identity been
- 7:44strengthened? I don't think so. We were
- 7:46promised a clean sweep. Did we get a
- 7:48clean sweep? I don't think so either.
- 7:49So the right has lied a lot and
- 7:51betrayed a lot. I listened carefully to
- 7:53Michel Barnier on the TF1 news, and
- 7:54what I heard from Michel Barnier is
- 7:56that he wouldn't rule out including
- 7:58left-wing ministers in his government.
- 8:00So firstly, it won't be a right-wing
- 8:02government; it will be a centrist
- 8:04government that will govern with the
- 8:06left. Basically, Macronism as before. I
- 8:08heard Michel Barnier tell us he wanted
- 8:10to regulate migration flows with
- 8:12humanity, while the majority of French
- 8:15people want to stop migration flows
- 8:17with firmness. That is not at all what
- 8:20we are proposing. I also heard him tell
- 8:22us he wanted to raise taxes for more
- 8:25fiscal justice, and one sentence later,
- 8:27tell us he was pro-business. So I don't
- 8:29feel like this is the program that will
- 8:31save France. I must admit I don't have
- 8:33much hope for Michel Barnier's
- 8:34government. I'm afraid the French
- 8:36people have too much, because we've
- 8:37already been disappointed far too often
- 8:39. I think that's what makes the French
- 8:41sick of politics. And when we see—I'm
- 8:42really finishing here—when we see
- 8:44that there was an Odoxa poll this
- 8:45summer that I found major, which tells
- 8:47us that 90%of French people are sick of
- 8:49politics, across all parties (I include
- 8:51us in that), it's a challenge for
- 8:52everyone. Everyone should realize the
- 8:54extent of it. 88%of French people tell
- 8:56us that parties are dishonest and don't
- 8:58have any answers to their problems. I
- 9:00think one of the major answers that
- 9:02needs to be given is a revolution of
- 9:04depoliticization. We must depoliticize
- 9:07the economy, depoliticize schools,
- 9:09depoliticize our taxation and our
- 9:11foreign policy, and we must
- 9:12depoliticize culture. A major program
- 9:15that awaits us to respond to this
- 9:16disgust of the French people.
- 9:17Rokhaya Diallo, a question for Sarah.
- 9:19Yes, yes, yes. You are very, very
- 9:20preoccupied with talking about the
- 9:22future by anticipating things you don't
- 9:24really have any control over. And I
- 9:26have the impression that you are still
- 9:27quite uncomfortable acknowledging the
- 9:28situation as it is for you today. The
- 9:30fact is that even though you are a very
- 9:32, very young party, you benefited from
- 9:34unprecedented exposure when Éric
- 9:36Zemmour formed Reconquête because he
- 9:38had significant media reach. And
- 9:39between what was presented of him in
- 9:412021, before he was a candidate in the
- 9:44presidential election, and what you—
- 9:46well, the stage you are at today—I
- 9:48get the impression that you are more of
- 9:50a think tank than a true political
- 9:52party. You claim to have influence over
- 9:54the other parties. So that is more the
- 9:56work of a think tank, but as a party,
- 9:57there is still quite a significant
- 9:59collapse. Do you not want to draw
- 10:01conclusions from that? Because really,
- 10:02what I see is more of a party that is
- 10:04in decay, you know.
- 10:04And we have less than 2 minutes left to
- 10:06answer this question. I will answer
- 10:07very briefly. First, I thank you for
- 10:08the compliment. Yes, indeed, we have an
- 10:10impact on French intellectual life.
- 10:11To me, it is a harmful impact, but that
- 10:13wasn't intended as a compliment. In any
- 10:15case, it’s not you acknowledge the
- 10:18impact, and I thank you for it because
- 10:20I believe it is necessary. I think that
- 10:22if the Left has one lesson to teach us,
- 10:23it is what it has done since May 68: it
- 10:25waged the cultural battle, it won the
- 10:27cultural battle, and it is thanks to
- 10:29its cultural battle that it then
- 10:30achieved victory at the ballot box. So
- 10:32what you are acknowledging for us is,
- 10:33for me, the first step. We will get to
- 10:35the second, and I am certain that one
- 10:37day we will govern this country.
- 10:38Any reaction to the Abbé Pierre
- 10:40scandal, these new testimonies that
- 10:43were released today with accusations
- 10:45dating back to the 50s? The Church knew
- 10:48, everyone seemingly knew, yet no one
- 10:50said anything. Well, like with all
- 10:52these MeToo topics and these
- 10:53accusations, it is very difficult to
- 10:55give the impression of delivering
- 10:56justice on a TV set. I don’t have the
- 10:58facts; I don’t know if it’s true. I
- 10:59understand that we must
- 11:00You don't know if it's true. You don't
- 11:02know if all these women and all these
- 11:03witnesses are telling the truth.
- 11:04Were you there? Do you know?
- 11:05I am asking you the question.
- 11:07But you know, if you have the
- 11:08information, I will say everything.
- 11:10I have—there is an investigation that
- 11:12was conducted by an organization. There
- 11:14are dozens and dozens of testimonies.
- 11:16So, we will be patient. The progress of
- 11:18civilization is impartial justice in a
- 11:19court of law with a lawyer, people who
- 11:21can defend themselves. I love
- 11:23civilization, so I will wait for the
- 11:24investigation.
- 11:25Thank you very much for having been our
- 11:28guest. Yeah.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Sarah Knafo sur France Info : Quelle neutralité sur le service public ! by Sarah Knafo, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,503 words across 394 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.