YouTube2Text

Safeguarding Adolescents in London (SAIL) Talking Heads Series w/ Abi Billinghurst — Transcript

by London Innovation & Improvement Alliance (LIIA) · 1,192 words · 81 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:14Hello, I'm Abi. I am the founder and chief exe.  Abianda is a charity that works with girls and
  2. 0:21young women who are affected by criminal  exploitation and violence that's typically
  3. 0:25associated with gangs and county lines. and  we've been delivering services across London
  4. 0:30and working nationally for over 10 years. I'm very  pleased to be talking to you about the concept of
  5. 0:36participation is protection and how we safeguard  in partnership with girls and young women who are
  6. 0:43affected by criminal exploitation and violence.  So when safeguarding girls and young women who are
  7. 0:50impacted by criminal exploitation and violence,  there is a very real and understandable tension
  8. 0:56at play. On one hand, we have a duty to protect,  to act, to intervene, to prevent serious harm
  9. 1:03wherever possible. And in high-risk, volatile  contexts, protection quite understandably takes
  10. 1:09priority. But at Abiandza, we are also deeply  aware that when protection is prioritized without
  11. 1:17participation, safeguarding can unintentionally  replicate the very dynamics of control, coercion,
  12. 1:24and powerlessness that young women are already  experiencing. Dr. Camille uh Warrington is someone
  13. 1:31who speaks uh extensively on that topic. So the  question for us is not whether protection matters.
  14. 1:38Of course it absolutely does. The question is how  we hold protection rights and participation rights
  15. 1:46together, especially when the risks are complex,  networked, and urgent. Girls and young women
  16. 1:53affected by criminal exploitation and violence are  not living single issue lives. They're navigating
  17. 2:00layered harm across relationships, families,  communities, systems, structures, and places,
  18. 2:06often under constant surveillance, threat, or  pressure. And we know that this harm is not
  19. 2:14experienced evenly. It's frequently exacerbated by  intersectionality by the way gender, race, class,
  20. 2:23care experience, immigration status, disability,  and poverty intersect in young women's lives.
  21. 2:29And certainly at Abiandza, we see many girls,  particularly black and global majority girls,
  22. 2:34um where this means increased visibility to  systems of control and often criminalization, and
  23. 2:42sometimes reduced access to care, protection, and  belief. And these intersecting identities shape
  24. 2:48how on one hand risk is perceived, how behavior  is interpreted, and how safeguarding responses um
  25. 2:54are applied. and they also shape whether a young  woman is seen as vulnerable, culpable, or simply
  26. 3:00overlooked altogether. Um, and if you haven't  yet, please do refer to Janine Davis's work on
  27. 3:05safeguarding child protection and adultification  bias. So, in this context, safeguarding decisions
  28. 3:12don't land in a vacuum. They land inside  unequal systems and power dynamics and
  29. 3:18inside relationships that can either deepen harm  or begin to um interrupt it. And this is why
  30. 3:24Abiander's safeguarding approach is deliberately  relational. We work from the principle that we
  31. 3:30cannot safeguard young women effectively if she is  not present and involved in the conversation. Not
  32. 3:36because participation is comfortable or an easy  option. Far from it. But because safeguarding
  33. 3:42that happens without her, we think is far more  likely to break trust, to trigger disengagement,
  34. 3:49and to collapse potentially under pressure. When  safeguarding becomes something that's done to her
  35. 3:55rather than done with her, it becomes another  system to survive rather than a relationship
  36. 4:01that can hold her and actually allow her to  experience what power holding and decision
  37. 4:07making might feel like in systems and structures.  Our works underpinned by really four really
  38. 4:13important pillars um of practice participatory,  contextual, ecological and solution focused. So
  39. 4:22a participatory approach is not about consultation  after decisions have already been made. It's about
  40. 4:28actively creating and protecting a space for  her voice to shape decisions even in high-risk
  41. 4:35moments. This might mean slowing down processes  which can feel counterintuitive. Um it might
  42. 4:42mean explaining decisions transparently, seeking  consent from her wherever possible and supporting
  43. 4:49her to understand not just what's happening but  also why is it happening and these moments build
  44. 4:55something critical relationship and trust. A  contextual approach recognizes that harm doesn't
  45. 5:01sit neatly within individuals in their remediate  environment. risk and harm is produced through
  46. 5:08environments, relationships, systems, structures,  networks, many of which she has little control
  47. 5:15over. And again, if you're not familiar, please  do look at the work by Professor Carlen Furman and
  48. 5:21her team in the contextual safeguarding network  at Durham University. An ecological lens allows us
  49. 5:27to see how safeguarding action in one area of her  life can actually escalate risk in another and why
  50. 5:34decisions must be made with a deep understanding  of her wider world. And being solution focused
  51. 5:40means we ask not what is the problem but what  helps. What changes does she want to see in her
  52. 5:46life? What increases safety now? What works and  what doesn't work in keeping her engaged? and what
  53. 5:54strengthens her ability to navigate risk beyond  our involvement because we cannot be involved in
  54. 5:59her life every hour of the day. Central to all  of this is a deliberate shift away from what we
  55. 6:06call a deficit model which focuses on behavior  compliance and control and where she can often
  56. 6:14become the problem. Instead, we work from a  strengths and competence-based position where
  57. 6:19her expertise is valued and central. We ask,  for example, how she survived, what strategies,
  58. 6:28strategies, and skills is she already deploying to  get navigate harm and trauma. What knowledge does
  59. 6:34she hold about people, places, and timings that no  system holds about her life? Charlie Cross, a much
  60. 6:44valued member of the Abiandanda team, articulates  wonderfully how a young woman's insight allows
  61. 6:51safeguarding to move beyond paper plans and  procedures and into something far more protective,
  62. 6:57a relationship that's grounded in trust, realism,  and respect. In practice, this often means
  63. 7:04sitting with risk a little longer than can feel  comfortable. It means pausing instead of reacting
  64. 7:10and it means risk assessing our own actions asking  whether they will strengthen safety or fracture
  65. 7:17trust and increase danger. We use participatory  tools such as contextual safety planning,
  66. 7:25relationship and location mapping all on the basis  of her expertise and also the deconstruction of
  67. 7:31exploitative narratives not just to manage risk  but to deepen understanding and critical thinking
  68. 7:38together. And when we must act without consent  because sometimes we must when serious harm is
  69. 7:44present, we do so transparently wherever possible.  We explain what's happening, what may come next,
  70. 7:51and how she can remain informed and involved.  Because even when protection must take precedence,
  71. 7:58relationship still matters. This is not  soft safeguarding. Again, Charlie's words,
  72. 8:05it's careful, ethical, and defensible safeguarding  because when safeguarding is experienced as
  73. 8:11control, young women generally disengage.  But when it is experienced as a relationship,
  74. 8:18there's a much greater chance that they stay.  And it is relationships, not surveillance,
  75. 8:25not compliance, not control, that keep young  women safer, more connected, and more able to
  76. 8:31imagine a different future for themselves.  At Abiander, we don't see participation as
  77. 8:36an optional extra. It's in our DNA. We see it as  the mechanism through which safeguarding works.
  78. 8:43That's why we say participation is protection.  So if you'd like to learn a bit more about
  79. 8:50Abiand's safeguarding approach, specialist  training, and systems change work, including
  80. 8:54our work on criminal exploitation, contextual  safeguarding, and participatory practice,
  81. 8:59you can explore our resources and expertise at  abiander.com. It's been lovely to talk to you.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Safeguarding Adolescents in London (SAIL) Talking Heads Series w/ Abi Billinghurst by London Innovation & Improvement Alliance (LIIA), generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,192 words across 81 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.