YouTube transcript (sRvrXL83N-c) — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:09You know I thought where we'd start Ali
- 0:11is you know a lot of talk right before
- 0:14you joined about there's world's moving
- 0:17fast
- 0:18>> XAI cursor open AI fighting anthropic
- 0:21you know you guys have done such a great
- 0:23job of stacking you know going from a
- 0:25data business to a lakehouse business to
- 0:26now an AI business just state of the
- 0:28union. Mhm.
- 0:29>> View from the top. What are you what are
- 0:31you seeing? Like frame the landscape for
- 0:33us. Um what are the biggest things that
- 0:35you were thinking about? And you know,
- 0:37I've got a bunch of questions that we
- 0:38can talk, but I thought we'd just open
- 0:39it up to like what is the biggest thing
- 0:41on your mind as you as you think about
- 0:42AI?
- 0:43>> Yeah, I think that uh you know, I think
- 0:44you guys can chill out. Don't be
- 0:46stressed. You know, I think times are
- 0:48crazy and uh I think it's not warranted
- 0:52basically. And I think the stress uh
- 0:54makes people do stupid things and chase
- 0:56just uh you know whatever happens to be
- 0:58the crazy thing that everybody's talking
- 1:00about on Twitter. Uh I think it makes
- 1:02people have tunnel vision and not work
- 1:04on the right stuff.
- 1:05>> Yeah.
- 1:06>> Uh and I think that's what I see with
- 1:07like the current generation. Like every
- 1:09year we have interns coming to data
- 1:10bricks and the interns I do always like
- 1:12a session with them an hour or 90
- 1:14minutes or something they can ask
- 1:15questions and last two years have been
- 1:17just insane. Before they would ask for
- 1:19like good career advice and you would
- 1:20give them good career advice. Now
- 1:22they're like 22 year olds who are like
- 1:24oh my god should I like start start my
- 1:26own company and be a CEO or if I like
- 1:28delay that by six months working on
- 1:29something have I ruined my career and
- 1:31life is over and you know AGI is going
- 1:33to happen and I'm going to miss the boat
- 1:35and like what am I going to do? I'm like
- 1:36so I'm like just trying to tell people
- 1:38like calm down take a deep breath.
- 1:40Things take time.
- 1:41>> Yeah.
- 1:41>> You know so that's what I would say. I
- 1:43would say actually I think also in
- 1:45Silicon Valley if you think about it
- 1:46right now what's happening is I think uh
- 1:49and you might disagree with some of this
- 1:50so feel free to push back you guys can
- 1:51might disagree too you can push back as
- 1:53well uh but there's this quest for super
- 1:55intelligence which I think is
- 1:56unwarranted
- 1:58>> because first of all they're not even
- 2:00defining what super intelligence is but
- 2:02it's this kind of like godlike you know
- 2:03it's like I think people reading kurs
- 2:05well and you know it's take off
- 2:07singularity you know this thing that
- 2:09comes and like you know recursive
- 2:11self-improvement
- 2:12and you know cures all the diseases and
- 2:14GDP jumps by like 10% and unemployment
- 2:17goes to 20% and there's no more jobs and
- 2:21UBI to everyone and so on. No, I think
- 2:22they believe it. I think it's not
- 2:24needed. I think we already have AGI so
- 2:27we already have artificial general
- 2:28intelligence.
- 2:29>> Uh you know um how okay this is always
- 2:33equally fun. How many people think we
- 2:34have AGI already?
- 2:36>> Okay, it's always the same. It's always
- 2:38like 10%. [laughter] Okay. Uh, how many
- 2:40of you think that a lot of people that
- 2:42you interact with are not as smart as
- 2:44the smartest models that you use?
- 2:48>> Okay, [laughter] now let's start all
- 2:49over. How many of you think we don't
- 2:51have AGI yet? [laughter]
- 2:55>> By the way, it always works. It's like,
- 2:57you know, see, it's like the hypnosis is
- 2:59working for some reason. They've gone
- 3:02the whole world to believe we don't have
- 3:03AGI, but it's like you just answered it
- 3:05that you have it, you know,
- 3:07>> but yet nah, no. uh you want to move the
- 3:09goalpost. By the way, I was at the
- 3:11research lab in 2009 at UC Berkeley
- 3:13called AMPLab
- 3:14>> was probably the biggest uh most active
- 3:17kind of important AI lab of its time in
- 3:192009.
- 3:20>> And um you know the you know the god of
- 3:25AI was working in that lab which is
- 3:26Michael Jordan. His name is actually
- 3:27that. So he's like the Michael Jordan of
- 3:29AI. Uh [laughter]
- 3:31and um back then our definition of AGI,
- 3:34artificial general intelligence
- 3:36um you know we've hit that
- 3:39>> like anything we imagined would be AGI
- 3:40we already hit that and those are all
- 3:42the leading AI researchers in United
- 3:43States many of them were working in that
- 3:45lab but I was just I wanted to see like
- 3:47if I'm just full of it. So I went and
- 3:49asked some of those people that were
- 3:50there at the time and I asked them as
- 3:51hey do you agree and they all said yeah
- 3:53according to that definition in 2009 for
- 3:55sure we've hit that but you know and
- 3:57then there's always some you know stupid
- 3:59butt we moved the goalpost or we want to
- 4:01change it or we want to have some other
- 4:02definition or it did or the AI at some
- 4:04there's some example that you know it
- 4:06couldn't count the number of RS in
- 4:07strawberry or something so therefore we
- 4:09don't have AGI um we already have AGI
- 4:12okay it's already smarter than many of
- 4:14the people that you interact with that
- 4:15is general intelligence it is artificial
- 4:17it's not exactly a human it's not the
- 4:19way human brain works so we already have
- 4:21that so in some sense uh you know
- 4:24blowing a lot of money on GPUs and data
- 4:26centers and all of that kind of stuff is
- 4:28not really needed
- 4:29>> okay then there is at the same time so
- 4:31you ask for the state of the union on
- 4:33the other hand you have like the MIT
- 4:34tech report that says that 95% of the
- 4:36PC's are failing right
- 4:38>> uh it's kind of right directionally I
- 4:39don't know if the 95% might be wrong
- 4:41maybe it's just 75% who knows
- 4:43>> u but if you go inside of an enterprise
- 4:45and or inside of an organization you go
- 4:46into any and you look at how they're
- 4:48using stuff. The reality is that there's
- 4:52no like lots of agentic co-workers
- 4:54running around doing all the work, you
- 4:56know, blending with humans. That's not
- 4:58happening. Okay? It's just humans
- 5:01shuffling TPS reports.
- 5:03>> Okay? It's like office the QA the movie
- 5:05is office the movie the office space the
- 5:07movie is still like how the world runs.
- 5:10>> Yeah.
- 5:10>> This the reality. This is just the
- 5:12truth. Like
- 5:13>> even inside AI companies, that's how
- 5:14they run them. It's like they they like
- 5:15to think but they're hiring salespeople
- 5:17from old school companies and they're
- 5:18running things in old school ways and I
- 5:20don't see like that futuristic thing.
- 5:22>> So then what's going on? We have AGI but
- 5:24on the other hand uh none of this is
- 5:27working and no company is using it. What
- 5:29the hell is going on?
- 5:30>> Uh I think it's very simple. Um, if you
- 5:33don't get all the context that exists
- 5:34inside of these organizations and how
- 5:36humans work and everything, all the
- 5:37context we have in our heads, if you
- 5:39don't get that to the models and the
- 5:41agents, they're going to do lots of
- 5:43stupid mistakes and they're useless. And
- 5:44that's what's happening right now. The
- 5:46models just don't have or the agents
- 5:48don't have the context that humans have
- 5:50inside of organizations. Therefore,
- 5:52they're useless. They do stupid mistakes
- 5:53because they don't know all the stuff
- 5:54that we know. Mhm.
- 5:55>> You know, inside of every company,
- 5:57there's always like this one guy or this
- 5:59one gal
- 6:00>> who's like, "Oh, go ask John or Jane."
- 6:02Like she knows everything, you know, and
- 6:04everybody's like tapping on that
- 6:05person's, you know, and that's the one
- 6:06person you can't lose in the company. If
- 6:07you lose that person, the whole company
- 6:08collapses.
- 6:09>> Yeah.
- 6:10>> That one person has that one person
- 6:11exists in every department, in every
- 6:13company, in every organization. And that
- 6:15one person has all the context in their
- 6:16head.
- 6:17>> And that person what they have in their
- 6:19head is not inside of the model.
- 6:20>> So therefore, the model can't operate.
- 6:22it just doesn't know a lot of the stuff
- 6:24that's sort of usually John or Jane in
- 6:27that company have been there for 10
- 6:28years 15 years 20 years sometimes 30 40
- 6:30years um you need to get that
- 6:32transferred to the AI if you don't the
- 6:35AI doesn't matter if you get super
- 6:36intelligence and you can solve really
- 6:38difficult you know math questions um uh
- 6:42you know and if you can get that context
- 6:44into the AI we already have AGI and they
- 6:46can already crack the problem so my uh
- 6:49urge to you guys would be uh you If you
- 6:52want to have impact in the world, figure
- 6:54out how to get that context into the AIS
- 6:57uh inside of an like take an
- 6:59organization, how do you transform how
- 7:01old school business is happening and how
- 7:03do you get those processes into the
- 7:05agents then you will have massive impact
- 7:07because AGI is already here.
- 7:08>> Yeah,
- 7:08>> right. That's my state of the unit.
- 7:10>> AGI is already here.
- 7:11>> You got to download the brain
- 7:13>> into the silicon,
- 7:14>> get the carbon to talk to the silicon.
- 7:16>> Yes.
- 7:16>> You know what? Actually, we were just
- 7:17talking about this.
- 7:18>> And by the way, queue up your your like
- 7:19push backs. I'm very curious to hear.
- 7:22>> I'm sure a majority disagrees. How many
- 7:23disagree with this?
- 7:26>> Oh, not that many. I was hoping. Okay,
- 7:28I'm going to be more provocative. Okay,
- 7:30we need more push back. Okay, so you
- 7:32know, before we before we go into AI,
- 7:34you know, there's a shadow of AI.
- 7:36>> Uhhuh.
- 7:36>> Software is dead.
- 7:37>> Mhm.
- 7:38>> Software has been dead for a while.
- 7:39We've had this
- 7:40>> four times. It happens. Every time it
- 7:42happens, it bounces back.
- 7:43>> Yeah.
- 7:44>> Some macro reason,
- 7:46Brexit, taper tantrum, inflation. This
- 7:48time it's AI and the question that class
- 7:51is asking is should we be loading up on
- 7:53on software stocks. So, so is software
- 7:56dead? Is this a buy the dip situation?
- 7:59>> Uhhuh.
- 8:00>> And you know I can't think of a better
- 8:01person to ask because depending on the
- 8:03day you ask there's like software you
- 8:05know we AI company software company
- 8:07speak about that is software.
- 8:08>> I think you know better you're an
- 8:09investor I'm not an investor also I
- 8:11don't give financial advice. Uh but
- 8:14[laughter]
- 8:16having said that, if all software is
- 8:17dead, then isn't OpenAI entropic dead?
- 8:20>> They're just software companies with a
- 8:21bunch of researchers writing software.
- 8:24>> So those companies would be dead, too,
- 8:26right? So they shouldn't have trillion
- 8:28dollar valuations. SpaceX might make
- 8:29sense because they make rockets, but
- 8:31everybody else should be dead. Um,
- 8:33Nvidia should be dead because they just
- 8:35have really smart people who create chip
- 8:38designs, humans that use some software
- 8:40to create chip designs and then they
- 8:42ship them over the internet probably
- 8:43over to TSMC which is a real company
- 8:46creating actual chips. But then Nvidia
- 8:48would be dead as well. So the world's
- 8:49most valuable company should be dead as
- 8:51well cuz software is dead, right? So
- 8:53software obviously isn't dead and it's
- 8:54not going to be dead and Nvidia and Open
- 8:56AAI and Entropic are not going to be
- 8:57dead companies uh, you know, because of
- 9:00whatever SAS apocalypse or whatever we
- 9:01want to call it.
- 9:03Yeah.
- 9:03>> Um but um I do think two things are
- 9:06true. I think that um two uh big changes
- 9:11have happened which is one is barriers
- 9:13to entry
- 9:14>> uh have significantly gone down and then
- 9:16switching costs have significantly gone
- 9:18down. So let's talk about those. Um
- 9:21barriers to entry because it's easier
- 9:22than ever to write software.
- 9:24>> Mh.
- 9:25>> Um so that's like a new weapon.
- 9:27>> Yeah. anyone can produce software uh
- 9:30very cheaply
- 9:31>> almost at zero cost. It's not quite zero
- 9:32cost and it will never be zero cost but
- 9:34much much cheaper than before
- 9:35>> but that weapon is available to
- 9:37everyone.
- 9:37>> Mhm.
- 9:38>> So also the people that create software
- 9:39now also have that weapon. It's not like
- 9:41>> only some some new players have that
- 9:44everyone now.
- 9:45>> Mhm.
- 9:45>> So including data bricks like we're a
- 9:46software company but we also have that
- 9:48weapon and it's an awesome weapon using
- 9:49Have you used that weapon and
- 9:51substituted any of your core software
- 9:53expenses like your CRM, your IT help
- 9:55desk, your office of the CFO software?
- 9:58>> No, I think that's stupid. Uh, also I
- 9:59think switching costs are lowered
- 10:01because it's easier to switch between
- 10:02UIs.
- 10:03>> Mhm.
- 10:03>> Like, you know, humans get locked into
- 10:05software. They get, you know, I don't
- 10:06know if you're Are you How many use
- 10:08Android?
- 10:09>> Oh, no one. Okay. Wow. How many use
- 10:12>> you guys?
- 10:12>> Okay. Wow. Okay. All right.
- 10:16Um, you don't want to switch to Android.
- 10:18Why? You don't know the UI. You don't
- 10:20know how to use it, right? It's like a
- 10:22different UI. You would have to also
- 10:23transfer all your data, your phone
- 10:25contacts, all that. It's too much
- 10:27inertia switching cost. That's a
- 10:28switching cost, right? But if in the
- 10:30future you're just talking to an agent,
- 10:32that switching cost gets eliminated
- 10:33because you're just talking to an agent.
- 10:34So, who cares if the agent is
- 10:36instrumenting your Android or your
- 10:38iPhone or your Gmail or Outlook or your
- 10:41Salesforce or the competitor or whatever
- 10:43it is. So, that's like the switching
- 10:44costs coming down as well. M
- 10:46>> um so yeah I think it's going to be more
- 10:48competition
- 10:49>> um so I think software companies will
- 10:51have to run more efficiently
- 10:53>> uh that I think is going to happen
- 10:55>> um but software is not the only moat
- 10:57there's a good book you should read it's
- 10:59called the seven powers how many have
- 11:00read the seven powers
- 11:02>> okay bunch of people here okay yeah so
- 11:03there's like there are moes that are not
- 11:05just software right I mean like
- 11:07economies of scale if you can do things
- 11:09at scale better than anyone else uh so
- 11:11that you can afford crazy fixed costs
- 11:14cuz you're advertising them way because
- 11:16of your scale you know Amazon AWS
- 11:20um you know uh then that's a moat
- 11:23>> uh if you have a brand like Ferrari or
- 11:25Rolex you know that's a that's a moat
- 11:28people writing cheap software can't just
- 11:30come replace that brand people care
- 11:31about that brand
- 11:33>> uh trust you know like I'm the only one
- 11:35providing you can trust my company we
- 11:38don't get hacked we have like really
- 11:39secure software we have special
- 11:41certification maybe we have patents that
- 11:43remains a moat that you cannot break
- 11:45that that easily. So um all these remain
- 11:49uh there's a bunch of other ones
- 11:50switching costs on so um data is a big
- 11:53moat. If you have special data that no
- 11:55one else has
- 11:56>> um that only you have
- 11:58>> that's a moat doesn't matter if they can
- 11:59write cheap software. So so I think it's
- 12:02the answer is in between.
- 12:04>> Yeah.
- 12:04>> The way I say it is if if a company has
- 12:07uh been around for 10 years and they
- 12:09have not innovated if their software
- 12:10looks the same as 10 years ago but the
- 12:12revenue has been going up
- 12:13>> Yeah. they should be worried. Yeah.
- 12:15>> Because they have not been innovating
- 12:16and it's probably easier for a company
- 12:18that starts today to then with you know
- 12:21barriers of entry being lower write
- 12:23software quickly that's much better than
- 12:25that company because that company hasn't
- 12:26done anything for 10 years.
- 12:27>> Yeah.
- 12:28>> They should be really afraid.
- 12:29>> Yeah.
- 12:29>> Uh and probably they don't have the
- 12:31innovation muscle anymore because they,
- 12:33you know, they're not innovating. So
- 12:35obviously they're not they don't have
- 12:36innovators. Um those kind of companies
- 12:38are going to be wiped out.
- 12:39>> Yeah. But there's going to be other
- 12:40companies that have been innovating the
- 12:42last 10 years and they're software
- 12:43companies or companies that now get
- 12:45their together because they're nervous
- 12:47>> and they'll be fine too.
- 12:49>> Perfect.
- 12:49>> So what do you think? You're an
- 12:50investor.
- 12:51>> I mean I think um there's a grade
- 12:53exactly as you said like if I was to
- 12:54give the grades to types of software
- 12:57companies I would say if you have got a
- 12:59lot of data like you said if you've got
- 13:01you know some cyber like you're like in
- 13:04some core loop you're probably most
- 13:05robust and immune from it. Somewhere in
- 13:08the middle is all the workflow software
- 13:09like which has not innovated. The UX
- 13:11still looks same and you're like
- 13:12scrunching down on your shoulder and
- 13:13typing I met Ali Goatsy today. These are
- 13:15the notes like that stuff's probably
- 13:17gone.
- 13:17>> Yeah.
- 13:18>> If you you were exactly you said no
- 13:20innovation you were a part of the old
- 13:23habit.
- 13:23>> But any one of those they have customers
- 13:25they have data. If they build great AI
- 13:28and start innovating they can keep the
- 13:30keep keep on going. They might have to
- 13:32change their pricing structure and their
- 13:33cost basis but they'll be fine. Uh in
- 13:35fact they have a lot of advantages
- 13:37against incumbents. They have data, they
- 13:39have customers and they have some scale.
- 13:41So they have some economies of scale
- 13:42going
- 13:43>> but they do have to get their together
- 13:45and that's you know easier said than
- 13:46done.
- 13:47>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'll um flash a chart.
- 13:50Have you guys seen this uh chart from
- 13:52Ethan Malik? He talks about AI is very
- 13:55good at some things. He calls it the
- 13:57jagged frontier.
- 13:59this is customer support. Software
- 14:02engineering uh would be like this would
- 14:04be the frontier of like maybe software
- 14:05engineering, maybe this is customer
- 14:06support or whatever. But then there's a
- 14:08lot of stuff that's like terrible at
- 14:10like like this scale or this scale or
- 14:12and so on. And you know you Ali, you see
- 14:16a lot of
- 14:17>> we're here man
- 14:19already.
- 14:19>> We're over there.
- 14:20>> We're here. We're here.
- 14:22>> Um
- 14:22>> they kind of admitted to it.
- 14:23>> That's right. That's right. That's
- 14:25right.
- 14:25>> Reluctantly.
- 14:26>> Yeah.
- 14:26>> Yeah. So, you know, you you've got what,
- 14:29like 6,000 7,000 customers? Those are
- 14:3110,000 customers.
- 14:32>> No, we have probably 20,000 customers.
- 14:34>> 20,000 customers. Sorry.
- 14:35>> Plus, yeah.
- 14:36>> As you see this and you have that's a
- 14:38very good sample of the entire universe
- 14:39of what's happening. So, in that sample
- 14:41of 20,000 customers,
- 14:43>> what are what are areas where AI is like
- 14:45hitting home runs and like working as
- 14:48advertised?
- 14:49>> Yep.
- 14:49>> And what are areas where the frontier is
- 14:52still uh rough and it's not working? The
- 14:54PC's are failing.
- 14:55>> Yeah. Look, it's not AI's fault. I mean,
- 14:57most companies are somewhere here.
- 14:59>> I think we have AGI, but I think most
- 15:01companies, if you look at how much are
- 15:02they, maybe they're having AI is helping
- 15:04me in some tasks. That's what most
- 15:06companies are doing. That's just how it
- 15:08is.
- 15:08>> Mhm.
- 15:08>> And uh it's because that context isn't
- 15:11there in the model.
- 15:13>> So, the model can't do it. Take support,
- 15:15which everybody said, okay, that's going
- 15:16to be dead. Support is like gone. Yeah.
- 15:18>> Right. Support is very hard.
- 15:20>> Support are l literally the things that
- 15:21humans don't know what to do. Like they
- 15:23they get stuck. So, take data bricks.
- 15:24Databix offers support.
- 15:26>> Datab is a company that offers.
- 15:28>> It's a platform, advanced platform where
- 15:30you can do data science, machine
- 15:31learning, you can do advanced things on
- 15:33the platform. These are smart people who
- 15:35make, you know, big salaries. They have
- 15:37education, you know, they have data
- 15:39science education. They're trying to use
- 15:40data bricks and maybe they get stuck.
- 15:42So, their machine learning models
- 15:43doesn't have, you know, the right it's
- 15:46not getting the [clears throat] right F1
- 15:47score or, you know, something like that
- 15:49>> and they're stuck and they tried
- 15:50everything. They call our support.
- 15:53So it's pretty hard to automate that.
- 15:55You can't actually give it to none of
- 15:56the current support automation. We tried
- 15:58them all
- 15:59>> companies all of them immediately even
- 16:01actually when they start talking to us
- 16:03as soon as they know who we are we're
- 16:04like whoa whoa we can't help you like
- 16:06you go do get out of here [laughter] you
- 16:09know uh so uh so yeah most of the world
- 16:12is over here
- 16:13>> but it's because we don't have the
- 16:14context. If the AI could have all the
- 16:16context of how our support engineers at
- 16:18data bricks operate
- 16:19>> then the AI could do it.
- 16:21>> Yeah. it just doesn't have it.
- 16:22>> Yeah. You know, one of the things we
- 16:23used to say at panel is your AI strategy
- 16:25starts at your data strategy. Yes. You
- 16:27got to get the roads paved and have the
- 16:29data flowing and
- 16:31>> is that you know if you were to bucket
- 16:33the best enterprises who are like maybe
- 16:35like starting to head towards the right
- 16:36in your customer base of 20,000
- 16:39>> what is common between the ones who are
- 16:41making it work
- 16:42>> and the Ferraris are flying
- 16:44>> um and and and and ones where I'm I'm
- 16:47guessing it's a context problem for the
- 16:48ones that it's not working and what does
- 16:50it take to get the context working?
- 16:51>> Yeah, it's very hard. It's a human
- 16:53problem like it's not an AI problem. we
- 16:55already have AGI. It's a human problem.
- 16:57I I don't see anyone really doing an
- 16:58excellent job at this.
- 17:00>> You have to kind of rewire all your
- 17:01processes in the organization uh to to
- 17:03be able to do it. This is like well
- 17:05known. I mean my favorite is there's an
- 17:07article actually that I recommend people
- 17:08reading from 1990 uh produced by
- 17:11actually Stanford professor or
- 17:13researcher. Um it's called I think um
- 17:17you know from the dynamo to the
- 17:18computer.
- 17:19>> Okay, check it out. So dynamo to
- 17:21computer and it looks at different uh
- 17:23sort of u technological revolutions and
- 17:26how long it h how long it took for them
- 17:28to have impact on productivity of econ
- 17:30of the economy
- 17:31>> and it's just you know takes just
- 17:34forever like when the PCs came out the
- 17:36joke was the Nobel laureate economist um
- 17:40you know uh um uh Richard Solo said that
- 17:44>> computers or PCs you can find them
- 17:46everywhere except in uh the productivity
- 17:49statistics
- 17:51you know, like it just doesn't show up
- 17:53in the statistics. Um,
- 17:56>> why people were buying PCs and they were
- 17:58using them as typewriters.
- 18:00>> So, they would have people type on PCs
- 18:02but then print out the sheets and then
- 18:04put them in folders and then have
- 18:06assistants that like index them and do
- 18:08things. So, like you didn't see any
- 18:10productivity gains from it.
- 18:11>> And same thing with if you look at the
- 18:13industrial revolution, same thing
- 18:15happened. Uh, you know, we had these
- 18:17steam engines and the steam factories
- 18:20were sort of super dense and they were
- 18:22running like with these, you know, they
- 18:24were called the line uh shafts
- 18:27>> which were like these things that
- 18:28rotate.
- 18:29>> Mhm.
- 18:29>> When the electric engine came, that's a
- 18:31dynamo.
- 18:32>> Uh, it took 40 years before they saw any
- 18:34productivity gains in the in the
- 18:36economy.
- 18:37>> Wow.
- 18:37>> Yeah. Check it out. This is in that
- 18:39article. It took from 1880.
- 18:40>> The diffusion took 40 years. from 1880
- 18:43to 1920 when the electric engine came
- 18:46>> uh to see impact. So what they were
- 18:47doing is they were going to these
- 18:48factories that already were these line
- 18:49shaft factories
- 18:51>> that were these dense factories where
- 18:52you have a steam engine that's rotating
- 18:54this line shaft and it's rotating these
- 18:56belts and then everything is working you
- 18:58have these multiple stories um and all
- 19:01they did is just like the PC they use
- 19:03typewriter they would replace the steam
- 19:04engine with an electric engine
- 19:07>> and that doesn't just like replacing the
- 19:08PC with you don't get any um
- 19:11productivity gains it took till 1920
- 19:14>> but maybe it was 1915 but I'm roughly
- 19:17until they realize we have to change the
- 19:19whole factory floor.
- 19:20>> We have to move the factories out of the
- 19:22cities.
- 19:22>> We have to have like floor plans that
- 19:24are much bigger cuz now we can
- 19:27>> distribute the electricity. Electricity
- 19:29is much more it doesn't you know it's
- 19:31not like the um the torque that has you
- 19:34know inefficiency. Uh we can spread it
- 19:36out. We can have floor pans that are big
- 19:38and we can run different parts of the
- 19:39factory at different rates. Unit drive
- 19:41versus group drive. Um took a very long
- 19:44time.
- 19:44>> Yeah. That's what's going to happen.
- 19:45Same same thing now. Rewiring. I know it
- 19:48because I have 20,000 customers and I
- 19:49talked to them. I was late to this
- 19:50meeting because I was meeting one of the
- 19:52CEOs of one of the big banks and same
- 19:55problem. He has the same problem. All
- 19:57the organizations I work with have the
- 19:58same problem. They're like I'm not
- 20:00seeing any advant like I don't see.
- 20:02They're all like AI is amazing. It's
- 20:03coming. It's like I need it. I need to
- 20:05do that. But they're like I don't see
- 20:06any productivity gains in my
- 20:07organization. You know what the hell am
- 20:09I doing wrong?
- 20:10>> And I tell them we have AGI and they're
- 20:11like what?
- 20:12>> Like that is not true. Like we don't see
- 20:15anything.
- 20:15>> It's a very tough problem because you're
- 20:17like, "Hey, I got the brain, but I got
- 20:18to rebuild the human body."
- 20:20>> Yeah.
- 20:20>> The hands, the legs.
- 20:21>> Yeah. Let me give you the body.
- 20:23>> Yeah. Let me give you an example from
- 20:24data bricks.
- 20:25>> So, databicks helps you get data from
- 20:27all the different systems like
- 20:28Salesforce, workday, and so on. Collect
- 20:30them in one place,
- 20:31>> secure it, and then do AI on it. Like
- 20:34you can do predictions, you can build
- 20:35predictive models. That's what database.
- 20:37>> So, we built connectors to all these
- 20:38systems.
- 20:39>> These connectors are it would take us
- 20:41three quarters to build a production
- 20:43connector. We're good at this what we do
- 20:44for a living. We build these connectors
- 20:46like we can build the connector from
- 20:47data bricks to Salesforce production
- 20:48ready.
- 20:49>> It would take us three quarters so 9
- 20:51months to do that
- 20:53>> shipped secure
- 20:54>> nice with its own. That's like that's
- 20:55what we did.
- 20:56>> So you know as uh you know uh the LLMs
- 21:00got faster and faster and faster I
- 21:01started sort of experimenting with this
- 21:02myself and I was like oh I could write a
- 21:04connector in two days. So I went to the
- 21:06team that builds this and um and I was
- 21:09like hey I can do this in two days. How
- 21:11come it takes you guys three quarters?
- 21:12They're like, "Okay, great point. Let us
- 21:14come back to you." So, they went and
- 21:16they thought about it and they came back
- 21:17in two weeks and they said, "Okay,
- 21:19you're right. Uh, it's but you're also
- 21:22not right." We looked at it and yeah,
- 21:25this AI is useful. We can compress it
- 21:27down from 3/4 by one and a half month.
- 21:29So, we can get it from 9 months to 7 and
- 21:311/2 months.
- 21:32>> That's it.
- 21:33>> That's it. I'm like, well, I can do it
- 21:35in two days. And like no no no no
- 21:36offense to you but you know this is
- 21:38production code and it really actually
- 21:40works and you know we have like customer
- 21:43feedback and you know it's like secure
- 21:46and you know you wrote some toy God
- 21:48knows what that I mean no offense you're
- 21:50great but you know let us let us
- 21:52>> that's a missing link.
- 21:53>> Uh so I was like a man this is kind of
- 21:55depressing but yeah I'll take the one
- 21:56and a half month improvement and you
- 21:57know maybe it's something but maybe I'm
- 21:58just stupid and I don't get it.
- 22:00>> Yeah.
- 22:00>> Then I found another guy in the company.
- 22:02We went to him and we sort of said,
- 22:03"Hey, can you look at this problem?" And
- 22:05he's very first principal. He's a very
- 22:07smart guy and he doesn't care about all
- 22:09this like you know fluff. He's like he
- 22:11cuts through the fluff and he cut
- 22:12through the fluff and he worked with a
- 22:15team and he came back and they said,
- 22:17"Hey, after looking at the problem we
- 22:19can do seven connectors in one quarter."
- 22:21>> Boom.
- 22:22>> Yeah.
- 22:22>> Let's go. What is the difference?
- 22:24>> So what's the difference? Okay. So what
- 22:25he did is he he went from first
- 22:26principles with some team members and
- 22:28they looked at it and they said okay
- 22:30first quarter they're just sending our
- 22:32very expensive very smart Stanford
- 22:34educated product managers out to the
- 22:37customers to talk to the customers and
- 22:39collect feedback what exactly is your
- 22:40requirements how do you use Salesforce
- 22:42and so on that takes a full quarter at
- 22:44the end of that quarter our amazing
- 22:46smart uh product managers come back with
- 22:48like a 60 70 80 page super nice report
- 22:51on exactly all the requirements
- 22:52>> okay so you're blocked for a whole
- 22:54quarter so for sure You can't doll's law
- 22:56you can't compress it below below that
- 22:59>> then codew writing starts but we have to
- 23:01test this stuff so testing requires you
- 23:02to set up Salesforce workday Netswuite
- 23:04but those are not software by data
- 23:06bricks so we're not very good at that
- 23:07that takes a very long time and it's
- 23:08hard to find people to do that data
- 23:10bricks so that again is like a process
- 23:12that takes a long time for us to stand
- 23:14up and it's very errorprone so we
- 23:15couldn't do that either um and then we
- 23:18have one person for each connector
- 23:21>> they go on vacation they get sick you
- 23:23know so on so all of So what he did is
- 23:25he just from first principles looked at
- 23:26it and said we're going to just rewire
- 23:28all of this. And lots of people didn't
- 23:29like this. They were unhappy about it.
- 23:30But he said that u you know the product
- 23:34requirements instead of one quarter
- 23:36we're just going to take one week and
- 23:37quickly write down whatever we have. We
- 23:39might get things wrong but because the
- 23:40software is so fast to write we can
- 23:42rewrite it again.
- 23:43>> Right?
- 23:43>> So let's iterate faster. Uh the standing
- 23:46up the Salesforce instances let's
- 23:48outsource that to firms that can do that
- 23:50for us and we can just pay them a lot
- 23:51and they do it in parallel. So we can
- 23:53shrink that as well. And then one person
- 23:55per connector. Let's change it. Let's
- 23:56have seven people, seven connectors, and
- 23:58then they all work on all the connectors
- 23:59together. So we don't have what's
- 24:01called, you know, bus factor one.
- 24:03>> If someone is hit by a bus,
- 24:04>> the whole project is not stopped. Right.
- 24:06>> Right. Uh so um so yeah so got it all
- 24:10done into one quarter and seven seven
- 24:12connectors shipped and you know so but
- 24:16this had nothing to do with uh like
- 24:18really it didn't have anything to do
- 24:19with AI or AGI or smarter models or
- 24:22super intelligence or gi gigantic like
- 24:25you can have the next like GPT7 or OPU 6
- 24:29would not have helped us
- 24:31>> u do this better we needed to do those
- 24:33make those changes
- 24:34>> and that's like a human refactoring
- 24:36problem and process change and um so
- 24:38this is what the whole world is going
- 24:39through. So%
- 24:41>> that's what you need to do well if you
- 24:42want to if you want to succeed. Some are
- 24:43doing it better, others are not.
- 24:46>> Hamilton Helmer actually talks about
- 24:47this quite a bit actually. So for all of
- 24:49you who are picking assignment
- 24:52option one and want to be investors,
- 24:54Hamilton Helmer's uh book is a must
- 24:56readad on process power. We were
- 24:58debating this um before this if Ali you
- 25:00had uh $100 to invest across what Jensen
- 25:04calls the five layer stack energy chips
- 25:07infra model and apps
- 25:11where does value acrue if you were to
- 25:13put a 100 bucks in the in in the index
- 25:15of energy and chips and in so on uh with
- 25:18let's say a long-term time frame where
- 25:21does where would you put it how would
- 25:23you allocate the $100 um and why
- 25:26>> I'm a computer scientist I'm not an
- 25:27investor. I don't give financial advice,
- 25:30>> but
- 25:30>> but you're allocating,
- 25:32>> you know, you're you're
- 25:33>> $500.
- 25:33>> Yeah, you are allocating money data
- 25:35bricks time, right? Data bricks is
- 25:36across three of these.
- 25:37>> Yeah. I would just say look, it's
- 25:39obvious that the applications are going
- 25:40to be the winners,
- 25:41>> right?
- 25:42>> So, I would put put it in the top. Uh
- 25:44it's kind of like uh and I'll give you
- 25:46some some guesses that you know, but who
- 25:48knows actually it's very hard to
- 25:50predict. So you would have to kind of
- 25:52have a I would go early stage and I
- 25:55would have a seed strategy and I would
- 25:56invest in many many startups and I would
- 25:58get most of them wrong but a few would
- 26:00actually make it and they would be the
- 26:01next Google or whatever. Um but you know
- 26:05in 1990 like when I did my PhD
- 26:09um in the early 2000
- 26:11>> um I was in the networking field.
- 26:14Networking was like the cool thing to
- 26:15do. It was the advanced thing cuz the
- 26:16internet was like you want to work on it
- 26:18like the internet was the big thing at
- 26:20the time and you want to the coolest
- 26:22thing on the internet was
- 26:24>> uh networking
- 26:25>> and the hardest problem like the
- 26:28smartest math brains were working on at
- 26:30the time. We all knew what the future
- 26:31would look like.
- 26:32>> The future everybody knew what the most
- 26:34important problem everyone's going to
- 26:35work on is the what's called the
- 26:36multiccast problem
- 26:38>> which is yeah see [laughter]
- 26:40>> it's problematic that no one knows what
- 26:42that is today. We were we were clearly
- 26:44wrong. So multiccast is, you know, you
- 26:46want to broadcast from one source, let's
- 26:49say a soccer game or a football game or
- 26:51basketball game to the whole world
- 26:52because everybody wants to watch it at
- 26:53the same time.
- 26:54>> We didn't know how to solve that
- 26:55efficiently. So all of the smartest
- 26:57brains in the world were trying to work
- 26:58on this problem and bandwidth was scarce
- 27:01>> while we were doing this. And by the
- 27:02way, we actually, you know, had pretty
- 27:04good problems and I started a company on
- 27:05this
- 27:06>> uh and we had great solution.
- 27:09Unfortunately, the cost of bandwidth
- 27:11just plummeted and they just deployed so
- 27:13much fiber that no one this problem was
- 27:15not a problem ever.
- 27:16>> So, no one needed to buy this software.
- 27:18So, it was complete waste of time. Uh
- 27:20and at that time we thought the hardest
- 27:22problems the most interesting things to
- 27:23work on are Cisco routers, routing, BGP,
- 27:26border gateway protocol, internet
- 27:28protocol like you know queuing theory,
- 27:30quality of service, these kind of
- 27:31things. Those are like the most
- 27:32interesting things you can because we
- 27:33had tunnel vision on the internet
- 27:36>> and the what is the internet? Well, at
- 27:38the time it was the internet protocols
- 27:39and those things. No apps really
- 27:41existed, right?
- 27:42>> So, we were all focused on that. And
- 27:44today, everybody's focused, I would say,
- 27:46on
- 27:46>> I think like, you know, well, I think
- 27:48chips and you know, I think
- 27:49infrastructure,
- 27:51>> yeah, I think people are really right
- 27:52now the hot new thing is like Nvidia,
- 27:54OpenAI, Anthropic, Deep Mind, these are
- 27:56the things everybody's focused on. AGI,
- 27:58super intelligence. That's
- 28:00>> what I said at the beginning. But, uh,
- 28:02on the internet, there were like really
- 28:04weird things. Yeah.
- 28:05>> That took off. The really weird things
- 28:07that took off were like taxi business,
- 28:10you know, which is Uber.
- 28:12>> Uber. Yeah.
- 28:12>> Uh or selling books, which is the lamest
- 28:15thing ever, but that became Amazon,
- 28:18which became AWS.
- 28:19>> Yeah.
- 28:20>> You know, uh or uh renting your bedroom
- 28:23to people like, you know, that's Airbnb.
- 28:26Uh and or um sending people short text,
- 28:31>> right,
- 28:31>> which became Twitter,
- 28:32>> right?
- 28:32>> You know, right? uh these are like and
- 28:35if you said them in those words in 2000
- 28:37to people people would say you're out of
- 28:38your mind like you're insane you're full
- 28:40of it uh but that's those were the great
- 28:42ideas of the time those are the ones
- 28:43that came so I think it's the same thing
- 28:44here
- 28:45>> right
- 28:45>> uh to throw a few of them out there um I
- 28:48think healthcare is like 17% of US GDP
- 28:52>> um you know
- 28:54>> we we we all still unfortunately will
- 28:57die and we all care about our health and
- 28:59the health of our loved ones I think
- 29:02there's a huge we have, you know, uh the
- 29:05propensity to pay for this. Like we'd
- 29:07pay anything to be able to save lives or
- 29:09of our loved ones or our own lives or
- 29:12our own health issues. Uh and it's not
- 29:14particularly well done today. Surprise
- 29:16surprise, you know, healthcare is not
- 29:18like awesome. Uh so imagine a company
- 29:20that has seen a million patients
- 29:22>> like I have seen 100 million patients
- 29:25with your kind of genetic composition
- 29:26and the kind of issues that you might
- 29:28have in the future and I can help you
- 29:30>> but what are you willing to pay for me
- 29:32to help you with that? That could be a
- 29:34company that's trillions of dollars
- 29:35worth,
- 29:35>> right?
- 29:36>> Um to take something out of left field
- 29:38that I think people think is really, you
- 29:41know, not interesting and not but take
- 29:43education.
- 29:44>> Education actually in in VC space the
- 29:47consensus has always been education is
- 29:48like a terrible investment, right? Isn't
- 29:50that like VC people say always like
- 29:51never invest in education?
- 29:53>> What's the last public market company
- 29:55you know?
- 29:56>> Yeah. What's the last trillion dollar
- 29:57education company?
- 29:58>> Not even 100 billion. Yeah.
- 29:59>> Yeah. Yeah. Anything, right? Um so but
- 30:03most people have kids
- 30:04>> and you know more kids are produced and
- 30:07they they do need to go through uh get
- 30:10to get an education whether people
- 30:11believe it or not
- 30:13>> and um uh and people do care actually if
- 30:16the education for their kids are good or
- 30:17not. Elections are won and lost. There's
- 30:20cultural issues on these things like you
- 30:22know of what you you're allowed to teach
- 30:24my kids or not, right? Elections are won
- 30:25and lost on that. Not because it's a
- 30:27stupid topic, because it matters. Like
- 30:28what are you teaching my kids matters
- 30:30and are my
- 30:31>> kids being brainwashed to do the right
- 30:33thing or the wrong thing or are they
- 30:34gonna be do the are they you know well
- 30:36equipped to get the jobs of the future.
- 30:38>> Uh I think if if there's a company that
- 30:40can provide amazing education, right?
- 30:42>> Uh using AI um I think right
- 30:45>> people a lot of people will pay for that
- 30:47and if it's like proven that that does a
- 30:49better job than um than than you know
- 30:53whatever they're getting right now. Um
- 30:55just two flavors of like obvious
- 30:57companies that I think will exist and
- 30:58they could be trillion dollar companies
- 31:00>> if they do it well. They will have data
- 31:01mode.
- 31:02>> Yeah.
- 31:03>> Um they will have economies of scale
- 31:05mode.
- 31:05>> There's like winner takes it all kind of
- 31:08dynamics in those markets at least
- 31:10>> in countries in geos.
- 31:12>> Yeah.
- 31:12>> So uh so I think the value acrews to the
- 31:14top.
- 31:15>> Yeah.
- 31:15>> We can't wait.
- 31:16>> But I'm not an investor.
- 31:17>> Yeah.
- 31:17>> Can't wait for that to happen.
- 31:19>> Would you push back? No, I think I mean,
- 31:20look, I've I've written extensively
- 31:22about this, eagerly waiting for this
- 31:24what I call the blue triangle to uh to
- 31:27invert. Uh I don't know if you've seen
- 31:28this, but basically this is uh all of
- 31:31the money in AI
- 31:32>> Yeah.
- 31:32>> is with one guy.
- 31:34>> Yeah.
- 31:34>> That's why Jensen's so happy all the
- 31:36time as as you know.
- 31:37>> Yeah.
- 31:38>> Um
- 31:40>> these guys are fighting for
- 31:42>> dollars. There's like no money there.
- 31:44There's very little money here. I mean,
- 31:45people are making some money here and
- 31:47>> uh so we'll see. But but that's the bet.
- 31:49the bet is that this thing will look
- 31:50like a more sustainable
- 31:51>> Yeah, it will go that way. I mean% all
- 31:54value in Silicon Valley and in tech and
- 31:56in technology moves up the stack all the
- 31:58time.
- 31:58>> Yeah.
- 31:59>> Like you know you even look at the
- 32:00greatest companies like okay the company
- 32:02that created the PCs IBM was like the
- 32:04greatest market cap and all the value
- 32:05accured there. But then that became
- 32:06commoditized then it became the software
- 32:08on top of it which is like the operating
- 32:09systems and the Microsoft of the world
- 32:11and so on. Then you know here at
- 32:13Stanford actually a while back it was
- 32:15like 20 years ago VMware which is how do
- 32:17you virtualize that software and but
- 32:19that became commoditized and then like
- 32:20you know so it keeps moving up the stack
- 32:22all the time.
- 32:22>> Yeah
- 32:22>> that's how that's that's how it's going
- 32:24to be here too
- 32:25>> 100%. And you know the big one of the
- 32:26forces that is commoditizing this you've
- 32:28spoken about this is open source.
- 32:30>> Open source is uh getting pretty good.
- 32:32>> Yep.
- 32:32>> This blue line is open source.
- 32:34>> The the gap is closing. This is like
- 32:36what three three four months.
- 32:38>> Yeah.
- 32:38>> This gap is now like a month.
- 32:40>> Yeah. And but still people are spending
- 32:43so much money on these frontier models.
- 32:46>> Yeah.
- 32:46>> People cannot wait to get their hands on
- 32:4847 from open from from cloud or 55 from
- 32:52GPT. But
- 32:54>> then there's this whole economy of of
- 32:55very good open source models.
- 32:58>> What what do you make of all this? Like
- 32:59you on one side you've got people
- 33:01earning what 30 billion now or maybe 40
- 33:03billion entropic or
- 33:05>> but on the other side this open source
- 33:06stuff is like nearly free. Obviously
- 33:07you've got to pay the hosting.
- 33:09>> Yeah. How do you think this shakes out?
- 33:11Will will that model layer, the
- 33:13proprietary model layer acrew any value?
- 33:15>> No, I think it's going to be valuable.
- 33:17Yeah.
- 33:17>> And I think people will want it whether
- 33:18it's open source or not. Let's put that
- 33:20aside for a second. I think there will
- 33:21be token factories
- 33:22>> which serve this stuff up. It's just
- 33:24like the cloud,
- 33:25>> right? I don't think like I think we
- 33:27foolish to say you all will have your
- 33:28own little mini data center in your
- 33:30living rooms and you're going to run you
- 33:33know your own PCs and you're going to
- 33:34insert GPU cards that you buy at home
- 33:36and you're going to run this yourself
- 33:37>> or on your phone or MacBook or the edge
- 33:39>> some of them will exist it will come to
- 33:41the edges but I do think there'll be
- 33:42like big yeah
- 33:43>> centralized data centers where this
- 33:45happens
- 33:46>> but we haven't discussed are they
- 33:47running open source models or are they
- 33:48running proprietary models and um and
- 33:52here's a fun fact so moonshot the
- 33:54Chinese company released Kimmy. Yeah. Uh
- 33:562.6.
- 33:57>> Very good model.
- 33:58>> Two days two days ago or two days ago.
- 33:59>> Yeah, Tuesday. Uh yeah, Tuesday. Uh so
- 34:01two days ago they released three days
- 34:03two days ago they released 2.6. In
- 34:05January they released 2.5.
- 34:08>> And here's a fun fact. 2.6 that they
- 34:10released on Tuesday is the best model
- 34:12ever in the history of mankind ever
- 34:14produced. Frontier non-frontier if it
- 34:16just had been released in January.
- 34:18>> Yeah.
- 34:18>> But open source will be here.
- 34:20>> Yeah. And it will apply pricing
- 34:21pressure. And this business of frontier
- 34:24models,
- 34:25>> that core business of providing frontier
- 34:27models is going to be economies of scale
- 34:29game.
- 34:30>> And you'll have to uh do it at small
- 34:33margins. It's like an Amazon.com book
- 34:36selling business. Yeah.
- 34:37>> That's what it's going to look like in
- 34:38the future. Therefore, there not going
- 34:39to be that many people doing it.
- 34:40>> Yeah.
- 34:41>> It's just like an Amazon.com. And gross
- 34:44margins are going to be tiny and
- 34:46operating margins are going to be small.
- 34:47That's my
- 34:48>> Yeah.
- 34:48>> take.
- 34:49>> Yeah. Yeah. I think so too. Um, three
- 34:52rapidfire questions before we uh wrap.
- 34:55>> Your uh favorite AI product that you use
- 34:57every day.
- 34:58>> I don't know. That's a tough one. Uh um
- 35:01I mean I use all of these.
- 35:02>> Yeah.
- 35:02>> Uh you know I actually like cursor. I
- 35:05know that's like everybody loves cloud
- 35:06code.
- 35:06>> I like the diffs and how how how it
- 35:08works. So like on coding I use like a
- 35:10combo of those.
- 35:11>> I still kind of like it. Yeah.
- 35:12>> Are you still using it after uh Elon
- 35:14owns it?
- 35:15>> No, I stopped. No, of course. Yeah.
- 35:16[laughter]
- 35:18>> Yeah. because you're going to lose
- 35:19access to entropic and open tokens
- 35:21through cursor I presume.
- 35:23>> Yeah. Yeah. Awesome. It's great. Good,
- 35:26good, good, good supporter.
- 35:28>> Um,
- 35:28>> you've been
- 35:29>> the truth is I do use data bricks as
- 35:31gener products. This is the truth
- 35:32>> because you know it just most of my
- 35:35>> inside data bricks most of my decisions
- 35:36are like numerical and quantitive in
- 35:38nature like should we do this? What's
- 35:40the ROI on this? What's the cost on
- 35:41that? What it's going to cost us? What's
- 35:42the So, I need something that can
- 35:44understand numerical data and time
- 35:46series data. So Genie is like really
- 35:48good for that. So that's that's what I
- 35:50honestly go to quite a bit
- 35:51>> quite often.
- 35:52>> Right.
- 35:53>> Um future for data bricks. You've been
- 35:56at this for for 15 years or so. Um what
- 35:59is your vision for the next decade for
- 36:01data bricks?
- 36:02>> Well, I think the cost of software is
- 36:03going down.
- 36:04>> Yeah.
- 36:04>> And so barriers to entry and switching
- 36:07costs are going down. So there is an a
- 36:09SAS apocalypse of sorts, but not all
- 36:11software is going to be dead.
- 36:12>> Yeah. uh we would love to partake in
- 36:14that and
- 36:15>> right
- 36:15>> kill some software
- 36:16>> right
- 36:17>> right right any advice for uh students
- 36:20in the room who are about to uh make
- 36:23career decisions
- 36:24>> yeah I think don't don't be worried
- 36:26about the fear-mongering don't be
- 36:28stressed out take it easy um I think
- 36:32that uh that's those I was very stressed
- 36:34doing my PhD in the early 2000 I thought
- 36:36like the world is ending with the
- 36:37internet and everything and uh you know
- 36:39working on this most important problem
- 36:41that we all knew was the most important
- 36:42problem which was the multiccast problem
- 36:44which none [laughter] of you which none
- 36:46of you have heard of
- 36:48>> uh turn out not to be a problem. Uh but
- 36:51I think one interesting thing is that in
- 36:532000 we had the internet. In 2009 Airbnb
- 36:56was started,
- 36:56>> right?
- 36:57>> Okay. But there's no reason why Airbnb
- 36:59should start in 2009. Airbnb could have
- 37:01started. We I've made this argument to
- 37:02you. Airbnb could have started in 2001.
- 37:04>> Yeah.
- 37:04>> There's nothing like we needed something
- 37:06additional to happen in the world.
- 37:08>> You know, uh Airbnb could have happened
- 37:11and disrupted hotel businesses in 2001.
- 37:13Yet it took 9 years for someone to have
- 37:15that idea,
- 37:16>> right?
- 37:16>> And that that was Brian. And by the way,
- 37:18Brian is not like he sat there and he
- 37:19was taking a Stanford class thinking
- 37:21about like a case study project.
- 37:23>> Uh Brian needed like bed and breakfast,
- 37:25right?
- 37:26>> And like he was like conference or
- 37:27something. Yeah, it [clears throat] was
- 37:28at some conference and he's like why is
- 37:29this so hard? Like can't I just solve
- 37:30this myself? So it took nine years to
- 37:32come up with that good idea. So I think
- 37:34good ideas are very hard to come by
- 37:36actually. I think humans are very bad at
- 37:38coming up with great ideas,
- 37:40>> right?
- 37:40uh and we have like this tunnel vision
- 37:42and we focus on the wrong problems like
- 37:44we did with multiccast in my earlier you
- 37:46know my PhD was really stupid um so uh
- 37:52chill out and take a long-term
- 37:55perspective and uh you know work on the
- 37:58things that you think will have
- 37:59long-term good impact. I think Jeff
- 38:01Bessos did it pretty well uh when he was
- 38:04an investment banker in Wall Street and
- 38:07uh and he said, "Hey, zooming out,
- 38:10what's like the big thing that's
- 38:11happening? It's the internet."
- 38:12>> Yeah.
- 38:12>> And then he said, "Hey, let's just make
- 38:14a secular bet on internet's going
- 38:15there's going to be more and more
- 38:16internet. So, it's going to slowly over
- 38:18time disrupt things."
- 38:19>> So then he said said, "Okay, can we in
- 38:21the long run probably purchasing can
- 38:24move more to the net. Maybe not right
- 38:25now." And then he started with he was
- 38:27very modest and he started with kind of
- 38:29the dumbest thing you could possibly
- 38:30[laughter] no one like the unsexiest
- 38:32thing which was a complete commodity
- 38:33that looks identical and there's no
- 38:35differentiation which is books.
- 38:36>> Yeah.
- 38:37>> And he just started with that
- 38:38>> and he just bet on that secular trend
- 38:40and every year it was more and more
- 38:41right
- 38:42>> and you know and now it's like
- 38:44everything on the planet. It's the
- 38:45everything store. So, kind of think long
- 38:47term like that and don't be swayed by
- 38:49the coolest thing that everybody's like
- 38:51right now um sort of making lots of
- 38:54noise on Twitter on because chances are
- 38:56it's probably something like multiccast.
- 38:59[laughter]
- 38:59Yeah.
- 39:00>> Awesome. Well, thank you so much for
- 39:02staying longer, folks. Thank you all.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of YouTube transcript (sRvrXL83N-c) , generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 8,670 words across 1,325 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.