Richard Nixon Used DOJ Official To Track Watergate Investigation | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Sleep Number. Proven, quality sleep.
- 0:06Proven, quality sleep. >>> WHEN THE SENATE ASKED FORMER
- 0:08>>> WHEN THE SENATE ASKED FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY FOR THE
- 0:09FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY FOR THE NAMES OF PEOPLE HE CONFIDED IN
- 0:10NAMES OF PEOPLE HE CONFIDED IN ABOUT THE PRESIDENT ASKING HIM
- 0:11ABOUT THE PRESIDENT ASKING HIM AS HEAD OF THE FBI TO LIFT THE
- 0:13AS HEAD OF THE FBI TO LIFT THE CLOUD OF THE RUSSIA
- 0:15CLOUD OF THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, THE LIST THAT
- 0:16INVESTIGATION, THE LIST THAT JAMES COMEY GAVE THE SENATE WAS
- 0:17JAMES COMEY GAVE THE SENATE WAS NOT A LONG ONE.
- 0:20NOT A LONG ONE. >> WHO ARE THOSE SENIOR LEADERS
- 0:23>> WHO ARE THOSE SENIOR LEADERS AT THE FBI THAT YOU SHARED THESE
- 0:24AT THE FBI THAT YOU SHARED THESE CONVERSATIONS WITH?
- 0:25CONVERSATIONS WITH? >> AS I SAID, IN RESPONSE TO
- 0:27>> AS I SAID, IN RESPONSE TO SENATOR FEINSTEIN’S QUESTION,
- 0:28SENATOR FEINSTEIN’S QUESTION, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, MY CHIEF OF
- 0:30DEPUTY DIRECTOR, MY CHIEF OF STAFF, GENERAL COUNSEL, THE
- 0:32STAFF, GENERAL COUNSEL, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR’S CHIEF COUNSEL,
- 0:34DEPUTY DIRECTOR’S CHIEF COUNSEL, AND THEN MORE OFTEN THAN NOT,
- 0:35AND THEN MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, THE NUMBER THREE PERSON AT THE
- 0:37THE NUMBER THREE PERSON AT THE FBI, WHO IS THE ASSOCIATE DEPUTY
- 0:38FBI, WHO IS THE ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AND QUITE OFTEN THE
- 0:39DIRECTOR, AND QUITE OFTEN THE HEAD OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY
- 0:40HEAD OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY BRANCH.
- 0:42BRANCH. >> SIX PEOPLE IN JAMES COMEY’S
- 0:43>> SIX PEOPLE IN JAMES COMEY’S INNER CIRCLE.
- 0:45INNER CIRCLE. ALL BUT ONE OF THEM ARE NOW GONE
- 0:47ALL BUT ONE OF THEM ARE NOW GONE FROM THE FBI.
- 0:48FROM THE FBI. THE PERSON HE LISTED THIRD, FBI
- 0:50THE PERSON HE LISTED THIRD, FBI GENERAL COUNSEL -- FBI GENERAL
- 0:51GENERAL COUNSEL -- FBI GENERAL COUNSEL JIM BAKER, HE LEFT THE
- 0:53COUNSEL JIM BAKER, HE LEFT THE FBI IN MAY OF THIS YEAR.
- 0:55FBI IN MAY OF THIS YEAR. MR. BAKER SAID AT THE TIME HE
- 0:56MR. BAKER SAID AT THE TIME HE WAS GOING TO JOIN THE BROOKINGS
- 0:59WAS GOING TO JOIN THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION, AND HE PLANNED TO
- 1:00INSTITUTION, AND HE PLANNED TO WRITE FOR THEIR HIGH PROFILE
- 1:02WRITE FOR THEIR HIGH PROFILE LEGAL WEBSITE ON NATIONAL
- 1:03LEGAL WEBSITE ON NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES.
- 1:04SECURITY ISSUES. THEIR WEBSITE IS CALLED LAWFARE.
- 1:07THEIR WEBSITE IS CALLED LAWFARE. THIS WEEK, IN WHAT I THINK IS
- 1:09THIS WEEK, IN WHAT I THINK IS JIM BAKER ARTICLE NUMBER SIX FOR
- 1:12JIM BAKER ARTICLE NUMBER SIX FOR LAWFARE, HE HAS MORE OR LESS
- 1:14LAWFARE, HE HAS MORE OR LESS BLOWN UP THE INTERNET, AT LEAST
- 1:17BLOWN UP THE INTERNET, AT LEAST MY PERSONAL SOCIAL MEDIA FEED IS
- 1:19MY PERSONAL SOCIAL MEDIA FEED IS NOW USELESS FOR ANYTHING OTHER
- 1:20NOW USELESS FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THIS STORY.
- 1:21THAN THIS STORY. THIS IS THE PIECE HE HAS JUST
- 1:23THIS IS THE PIECE HE HAS JUST WRITTEN.
- 1:23WRITTEN. WHAT THE WATERGATE ROAD MAP
- 1:25WHAT THE WATERGATE ROAD MAP REVEALS ABOUT IMPROPER CONTACT
- 1:27REVEALS ABOUT IMPROPER CONTACT BETWEEN THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE
- 1:29BETWEEN THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
- 1:30JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. THIS IS AN IN-DEPTH HISTORICAL
- 1:32THIS IS AN IN-DEPTH HISTORICAL PIECE ABOUT PRESIDENT RICHARD
- 1:33PIECE ABOUT PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON AND THE TROUBLE HE MADE
- 1:34NIXON AND THE TROUBLE HE MADE FOR HIMSELF WHEN HE LEANED ON
- 1:36FOR HIMSELF WHEN HE LEANED ON OFFICIALS IN HIS OWN JUSTICE
- 1:38OFFICIALS IN HIS OWN JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BOTH TO TRY TO
- 1:39DEPARTMENT BOTH TO TRY TO INFLUENCE THE COURSE OF THE
- 1:40INFLUENCE THE COURSE OF THE WATERGATE INVESTIGATION, BUT
- 1:41WATERGATE INVESTIGATION, BUT ALSO SPECIFICALLY TO GET THEM TO
- 1:44ALSO SPECIFICALLY TO GET THEM TO FEED HIM INFORMATION ON THE
- 1:45FEED HIM INFORMATION ON THE ONGOING CASE.
- 1:48ONGOING CASE. JAMES BAKER, EX-FBI GENERAL
- 1:51JAMES BAKER, EX-FBI GENERAL COUNSEL NOW PROVIDING AN
- 1:53COUNSEL NOW PROVIDING AN IMPRESSIVE HISTORY LESSON ON HOW
- 1:55IMPRESSIVE HISTORY LESSON ON HOW ONE OF THE ARTICLES OF
- 1:56ONE OF THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST NIXON WAS IN
- 1:58IMPEACHMENT AGAINST NIXON WAS IN PART ABOUT HIM OPENING UP A BACK
- 2:00PART ABOUT HIM OPENING UP A BACK CHANNEL OF COMMUNICATION WITH A
- 2:02CHANNEL OF COMMUNICATION WITH A SENIOR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
- 2:03SENIOR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL THAT WAS DESIGNED TO
- 2:04OFFICIAL THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INFORM HIM ABOUT THE INNER WORKS
- 2:06INFORM HIM ABOUT THE INNER WORKS OF THE WATERGATE CASE.
- 2:07OF THE WATERGATE CASE. JOINING US NOW FOR THE INTERVIEW
- 2:08JOINING US NOW FOR THE INTERVIEW IS JAMES BAKER, FORMER GENERAL
- 2:11IS JAMES BAKER, FORMER GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FBI AND CO-AUTHOR
- 2:13COUNSEL OF THE FBI AND CO-AUTHOR WITH SARAH GRANT OF THIS
- 2:15WITH SARAH GRANT OF THIS OF HISTORY.
- 2:18OF HISTORY. MR. BAKER, IT’S REALLY NICE TO
- 2:19MR. BAKER, IT’S REALLY NICE TO HAVE YOU HERE.
- 2:20HAVE YOU HERE. I KNOW YOU DON’T DO THINGS LIKE
- 2:22I KNOW YOU DON’T DO THINGS LIKE THIS OFTEN IF AT ALL.
- 2:23THIS OFTEN IF AT ALL. SO IT’S A REAL HONOR TO HAVE YOU
- 2:25SO IT’S A REAL HONOR TO HAVE YOU ON THE PROGRAM.
- 2:26ON THE PROGRAM. >> THANKS, RACHEL.
- 2:27>> THANKS, RACHEL. FIRST TIME EVER.
- 2:28FIRST TIME EVER. >> I PROMISE IT WILL NOT BE TOO
- 2:29>> I PROMISE IT WILL NOT BE TOO PAINFUL.
- 2:30PAINFUL. >> OKAY.
- 2:30>> OKAY. WE’LL SEE, WE’LL SEE.
- 2:31WE’LL SEE, WE’LL SEE. >> I WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHY YOU
- 2:32>> I WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHY YOU DID THIS.
- 2:33DID THIS. YOU HAVE WRITTEN THIS PIECE.
- 2:34YOU HAVE WRITTEN THIS PIECE. IT HAS RECEIVED A LOT OF
- 2:35IT HAS RECEIVED A LOT OF ATTENTION, NOT ONLY FOR THE
- 2:38ATTENTION, NOT ONLY FOR THE HISTORICAL ANALOGY THAT PEOPLE
- 2:40HISTORICAL ANALOGY THAT PEOPLE ARE DRAWING TO OUR CURRENT
- 2:42ARE DRAWING TO OUR CURRENT SITUATION, BUT ALSO BECAUSE YOU
- 2:43SITUATION, BUT ALSO BECAUSE YOU WROTE IT.
- 2:44WROTE IT. CAN YOU JUST TELL ME WHAT IT IS
- 2:45CAN YOU JUST TELL ME WHAT IT IS ABOUT THIS PART OF HISTORY THAT
- 2:47ABOUT THIS PART OF HISTORY THAT INTERESTS YOU SO MUCH.
- 2:48INTERESTS YOU SO MUCH. >> SURE.
- 2:49>> SURE. A COUPLE OF THINGS.
- 2:50A COUPLE OF THINGS. WHEN I FIRST I DIDN’T REALLY
- 2:52WHEN I FIRST I DIDN’T REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE ROAD MAP VERY
- 2:54KNOW ABOUT THE ROAD MAP VERY MUCH BEFORE.
- 2:55MUCH BEFORE. AND WHEN IT WAS RECENTLY
- 2:56AND WHEN IT WAS RECENTLY RELEASED BY THE DISTRICT COURT
- 2:57RELEASED BY THE DISTRICT COURT IN WASHINGTON, D.C., I’D LOOKED
- 2:58IN WASHINGTON, D.C., I’D LOOKED AT IT.
- 2:59AT IT. I HEARD ABOUT IT.
- 3:00I HEARD ABOUT IT. I TOOK A LOOK AT IT AND STARTED
- 3:02I TOOK A LOOK AT IT AND STARTED READING IT.
- 3:02READING IT. AND I SAW ALL THESE REFERENCES
- 3:05AND I SAW ALL THESE REFERENCES TO HENRY PETERSEN.
- 3:05TO HENRY PETERSEN. I HAD WORKED IN THE CRIMINAL
- 3:07I HAD WORKED IN THE CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR MANY
- 3:08DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR MANY YEARS AND KNEW WHO HENRY
- 3:10YEARS AND KNEW WHO HENRY PETERSEN WAS, AND HE IS A
- 3:12PETERSEN WAS, AND HE IS A REVERED FIGURE THERE.
- 3:13REVERED FIGURE THERE. THAT SORT OF LEAPT OFF THE PAGE
- 3:15THAT SORT OF LEAPT OFF THE PAGE AT ME.
- 3:16AT ME. WHAT’S ALL THIS ABOUT?
- 3:18WHAT’S ALL THIS ABOUT? THE ROAD MAP ITSELF IS VERY
- 3:20THE ROAD MAP ITSELF IS VERY SPARSE IN TERMS OF THE
- 3:21SPARSE IN TERMS OF THE INFORMATION IT PROVIDES, BUT IT
- 3:23INFORMATION IT PROVIDES, BUT IT CITES TWO ADDITIONAL UNDERLYING
- 3:25CITES TWO ADDITIONAL UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS THAT I STARTED DIGGING
- 3:27DOCUMENTS THAT I STARTED DIGGING INTO, LIKE GRAND JURY
- 3:28INTO, LIKE GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS AND SOME OTHER
- 3:29TRANSCRIPTS AND SOME OTHER DOCUMENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
- 3:30DOCUMENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AS I STARTED TO READ THOSE, I
- 3:32AS I STARTED TO READ THOSE, I REALLY JUST WAS WHAT IN THE
- 3:33REALLY JUST WAS WHAT IN THE WORLD IS THIS ALL ABOUT?
- 3:35WORLD IS THIS ALL ABOUT? THE NUMBER OF INTERACTIONS THAT
- 3:37THE NUMBER OF INTERACTIONS THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
- 3:38THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HAD DIRECTLY WITH MR.
- 3:41STATES HAD DIRECTLY WITH MR. PETERSEN, WHO AT THE TIME AS YOU
- 3:42PETERSEN, WHO AT THE TIME AS YOU SAID EARLIER WAS RUNNING -- THIS
- 3:44SAID EARLIER WAS RUNNING -- THIS IS BEFORE THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
- 3:45IS BEFORE THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR WAS APPOINTED, HENRY PETERSEN
- 3:47WAS APPOINTED, HENRY PETERSEN WAS IN CHARGE OF EFFECTIVELY
- 3:49WAS IN CHARGE OF EFFECTIVELY RUNNING THE WATERGATE
- 3:50RUNNING THE WATERGATE INVESTIGATION, SUPERVISING IT.
- 3:51INVESTIGATION, SUPERVISING IT. AND SO THERE IS ALL THESE
- 3:53AND SO THERE IS ALL THESE CONTACTS.
- 3:53CONTACTS. THERE IS ALL THESE INTERACTIONS.
- 3:54THERE IS ALL THESE INTERACTIONS. THERE IS ALL THESE DISCUSSIONS
- 3:56THERE IS ALL THESE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PRESIDENT AS YOU
- 3:57WITH THE PRESIDENT AS YOU OUTLINED THE PRESIDENT MAKES
- 3:58OUTLINED THE PRESIDENT MAKES THESE COMMENTS ABOUT JOHN DEAN
- 4:04THESE COMMENTS ABOUT JOHN DEAN AND -- ABOUT EHRLICHMAN AND
- 4:07AND -- ABOUT EHRLICHMAN AND HALDEMAN, I’M SORRY, ABOUT HOW
- 4:08HALDEMAN, I’M SORRY, ABOUT HOW THESE ARE FINE UPSTANDING GUYS
- 4:09THESE ARE FINE UPSTANDING GUYS WHEN PETERSEN AND THEN ATTORNEY
- 4:13WHEN PETERSEN AND THEN ATTORNEY GENERAL GO IN TO SEE HIM AND SAY
- 4:15GENERAL GO IN TO SEE HIM AND SAY LOOK, WE’VE GOT A PROBLEM.
- 4:16LOOK, WE’VE GOT A PROBLEM. WE’RE REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT
- 4:17WE’RE REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THESE GUYS AND WE THINK YOU
- 4:18THESE GUYS AND WE THINK YOU SHOULD FIRE THEM.
- 4:19SHOULD FIRE THEM. AND THE PRESIDENT HAD A REACTION
- 4:20AND THE PRESIDENT HAD A REACTION THAT WAS KIND OF SURPRISING TO
- 4:21THAT WAS KIND OF SURPRISING TO ME.
- 4:22ME. BUT AS I DUG INTO IT MORE, IT
- 4:24BUT AS I DUG INTO IT MORE, IT WAS THE VOLUME OF THE -- IT WAS
- 4:26WAS THE VOLUME OF THE -- IT WAS THE NUMBER OF INTERACTIONS, THE
- 4:28THE NUMBER OF INTERACTIONS, THE NATURE OF THE SCOPE THAT REALLY
- 4:30NATURE OF THE SCOPE THAT REALLY SURPRISED ME.
- 4:31SURPRISED ME. I WAS JUST SURPRISED BY IT AND
- 4:33I WAS JUST SURPRISED BY IT AND INTRIGUED.
- 4:33INTRIGUED. AND I GUESS THE OTHER THING, AS
- 4:35AND I GUESS THE OTHER THING, AS YOU SAID EARLIER, THIS WAS
- 4:37YOU SAID EARLIER, THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT I WAS UNAWARE OF
- 4:39SOMETHING THAT I WAS UNAWARE OF BEFORE MYSELF.
- 4:40BEFORE MYSELF. AND HAVING WORKED IN THE JUSTICE
- 4:42AND HAVING WORKED IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FOR MANY YEARS.
- 4:43DEPARTMENT FOR MANY YEARS. I THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING THAT
- 4:45I THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING THAT MIGHT BE USEFUL TO FOLKS STILL
- 4:47MIGHT BE USEFUL TO FOLKS STILL IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO BE
- 4:48IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO BE AWARE OF, TO HAVE SOME KNOWLEDGE
- 4:50AWARE OF, TO HAVE SOME KNOWLEDGE ABOUT.
- 4:51ABOUT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I
- 4:52ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I STRUGGLED WITH ALL THE TIME --
- 4:53STRUGGLED WITH ALL THE TIME -- NOT ALL THE TIME, BUT FREQUENTLY
- 4:55NOT ALL THE TIME, BUT FREQUENTLY WAS HAVING TO CONFRONT NOVEL
- 4:59WAS HAVING TO CONFRONT NOVEL COMPLICATE
- 5:00COMPLICATE COMPLICATED, CHALLENGING
- 5:01COMPLICATED, CHALLENGING PROBLEMS THAT THERE WAS NO BOOK
- 5:02PROBLEMS THAT THERE WAS NO BOOK TO GO TO LOOK UP AN ANSWER.
- 5:04TO GO TO LOOK UP AN ANSWER. LIKE HOW DID PEOPLE DEAL WITH
- 5:06LIKE HOW DID PEOPLE DEAL WITH THIS BEFORE?
- 5:06THIS BEFORE? WHAT ARE THE GUIDELINES?
- 5:07WHAT ARE THE GUIDELINES? WHAT ARE THE CASES?
- 5:08WHAT ARE THE CASES? OFTENTIMES THERE WERE NO
- 5:09OFTENTIMES THERE WERE NO GUIDELINES OR CASES OR OTHER
- 5:11GUIDELINES OR CASES OR OTHER THINGS THAT YOU COULD GO TO.
- 5:12THINGS THAT YOU COULD GO TO. WHENEVER THERE IS SOMETHING THAT
- 5:14WHENEVER THERE IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN LOOK AT, SOMETHING TO
- 5:17YOU CAN LOOK AT, SOMETHING TO INFORM DECISION-MAKERS ABOUT
- 5:18INFORM DECISION-MAKERS ABOUT WHAT THE BEST WAY TO GO IS, IT
- 5:20WHAT THE BEST WAY TO GO IS, IT SEEMS LIKE SHOULD IT BE USEFUL
- 5:21SEEMS LIKE SHOULD IT BE USEFUL AND MIGHT BE USEFUL.
- 5:22AND MIGHT BE USEFUL. AND SO I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE
- 5:24AND SO I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE BOTH FOLKS IN
- 5:26HELPFUL TO HAVE BOTH FOLKS IN THE GOVERNMENT HAVE ACCESS TO
- 5:27THE GOVERNMENT HAVE ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION, AND THEN
- 5:28THIS INFORMATION, AND THEN OBVIOUSLY MORE BROADLY THE
- 5:29OBVIOUSLY MORE BROADLY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
- 5:31AMERICAN PEOPLE. I THINK IT’S -- WE, AS MANY
- 5:32I THINK IT’S -- WE, AS MANY PEOPLE HAVE SAID, IF WE DON’T
- 5:34PEOPLE HAVE SAID, IF WE DON’T LEARN FROM HISTORY, WE’RE
- 5:35LEARN FROM HISTORY, WE’RE CONDEMNED TO REPEAT IT.
- 5:36CONDEMNED TO REPEAT IT. SO THIS WAS PIECE OF HISTORY
- 5:37SO THIS WAS PIECE OF HISTORY THAT I PERSONALLY DIDN’T KNOW
- 5:38THAT I PERSONALLY DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT.
- 5:39ABOUT. I THOUGHT IT WAS INTRIGUING AND
- 5:40I THOUGHT IT WAS INTRIGUING AND INTERESTING.
- 5:41INTERESTING. AND AS YOU MENTIONED, SARAH
- 5:42AND AS YOU MENTIONED, SARAH GRANT AND I WROTE THIS UP AND
- 5:43GRANT AND I WROTE THIS UP AND PUT IT OUT THERE.
- 5:46PUT IT OUT THERE. >> ON -- IN TERMS OF LOOKING
- 5:47>> ON -- IN TERMS OF LOOKING BACK AT THIS AND SORT OF SEEING
- 5:50BACK AT THIS AND SORT OF SEEING HOW PEOPLE HAVE DEALT WITH THIS
- 5:51HOW PEOPLE HAVE DEALT WITH THIS BEFORE, WHAT MIGHT BE THE
- 5:52BEFORE, WHAT MIGHT BE THE RELEVANT PRECEDENT OR THE
- 5:54RELEVANT PRECEDENT OR THE LESSONS OF HISTORY HERE,
- 5:55LESSONS OF HISTORY HERE, OBVIOUSLY, THERE IS A LESSON OF
- 5:57OBVIOUSLY, THERE IS A LESSON OF HISTORY HERE IN TERMS OF NIXON.
- 5:58HISTORY HERE IN TERMS OF NIXON. NIXON GETS CAUGHT FOR DOING
- 6:00NIXON GETS CAUGHT FOR DOING THIS.
- 6:00THIS. AS YOU SPELL OUT IN YOUR PIECE,
- 6:02AS YOU SPELL OUT IN YOUR PIECE, ONE OF THE ARTICLES OF
- 6:03ONE OF THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT IS BASED IN PART ON
- 6:05IMPEACHMENT IS BASED IN PART ON HIM HAVING IMPROPER CONTACT WITH
- 6:08HIM HAVING IMPROPER CONTACT WITH THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ABOUT
- 6:10THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ABOUT THIS ONGOING INVESTIGATION.
- 6:11THIS ONGOING INVESTIGATION. >> RIGHT.
- 6:11>> RIGHT. >> I WONDER, THOUGH, IF IT WAS
- 6:13>> I WONDER, THOUGH, IF IT WAS ALSO IMPROPER FROM THE
- 6:14ALSO IMPROPER FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE JUSTICE
- 6:15PERSPECTIVE OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FOR HENRY PETERSEN,
- 6:17DEPARTMENT FOR HENRY PETERSEN, FOR THIS SENIOR JUSTICE
- 6:18FOR THIS SENIOR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TO BE
- 6:19DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TO BE TALKING TO THE PRESIDENT.
- 6:21TALKING TO THE PRESIDENT. CERTAINLY PETERSEN AT THE TIME
- 6:22CERTAINLY PETERSEN AT THE TIME WAS PILLORIED FOR HAVING DONE
- 6:24WAS PILLORIED FOR HAVING DONE THAT IT DIDN’T NECESSARILY LOOK
- 6:25THAT IT DIDN’T NECESSARILY LOOK GOOD THAT HE HAD BEEN HAVING ALL
- 6:27GOOD THAT HE HAD BEEN HAVING ALL THESE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE
- 6:28THESE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PRESIDENT ABOUT THAT
- 6:30PRESIDENT ABOUT THAT INVESTIGATION.
- 6:30INVESTIGATION. HOW DO YOU VIEW THAT, LOOKING
- 6:32HOW DO YOU VIEW THAT, LOOKING BACK ON IT?
- 6:32BACK ON IT? >> I GUESS A COUPLE OF THINGS.
- 6:34>> I GUESS A COUPLE OF THINGS. ONE IS I’M NOT A WATERGATE
- 6:35ONE IS I’M NOT A WATERGATE HISTORIAN.
- 6:36HISTORIAN. SARAH’S NOT A WATERGATE
- 6:38SARAH’S NOT A WATERGATE HISTORIAN.
- 6:38HISTORIAN. SO WE’RE NOT CAPABLE OF REALLY
- 6:40SO WE’RE NOT CAPABLE OF REALLY MAKING A FULL ACCOUNTING OF
- 6:41MAKING A FULL ACCOUNTING OF EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED HERE.
- 6:42EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED HERE. THAT’S NUMBER ONE.
- 6:43THAT’S NUMBER ONE. I MEAN, LOOK, IT DOES LOOK
- 6:45I MEAN, LOOK, IT DOES LOOK ALARMING WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS,
- 6:47ALARMING WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS, OF THE INTERACTIONS, BUT MR.
- 6:49OF THE INTERACTIONS, BUT MR. PETERSEN DID NOT KNOW ALL THE
- 6:51PETERSEN DID NOT KNOW ALL THE FACTS THAT WE KNOW NOW, RIGHT,
- 6:53FACTS THAT WE KNOW NOW, RIGHT, IN TERMS OF WHAT THE PRESIDENT
- 6:54IN TERMS OF WHAT THE PRESIDENT KNEW AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT WAS
- 6:56KNEW AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT WAS AWARE OF AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT
- 6:57AWARE OF AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT WAS TRYING TO ACHIEVE THROUGH
- 7:00WAS TRYING TO ACHIEVE THROUGH HIS INTERACTIONS WITH HIM.
- 7:02HIS INTERACTIONS WITH HIM. IF YOU TAKE MR. PETERSEN’S
- 7:05IF YOU TAKE MR. PETERSEN’S STATEMENTS AT FACE VALUE, AND HE
- 7:06STATEMENTS AT FACE VALUE, AND HE WAS A MAN OF INTEGRITY FROM
- 7:09WAS A MAN OF INTEGRITY FROM EVERYTHING I UNDERSTAND, SO I
- 7:09EVERYTHING I UNDERSTAND, SO I TAKE THOSE AT FACE VALUE, HE
- 7:11TAKE THOSE AT FACE VALUE, HE SAID LOOK, I WAS THE ASSISTANT
- 7:13SAID LOOK, I WAS THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY IN THE CRIMINAL
- 7:14ATTORNEY IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION.
- 7:15DIVISION. I FELT I HAD AN OBLIGATION TO
- 7:17I FELT I HAD AN OBLIGATION TO INFORM THE PRESIDENT WHAT WAS
- 7:19INFORM THE PRESIDENT WHAT WAS GOING ON.
- 7:20GOING ON. I THINK IMPLICIT IN THAT IS HE
- 7:22I THINK IMPLICIT IN THAT IS HE DIDN’T KNOW THE LEVEL OF THE
- 7:23DIDN’T KNOW THE LEVEL OF THE PRESIDENT’S INVOLVEMENT IN THESE
- 7:24PRESIDENT’S INVOLVEMENT IN THESE TYPES OF ACTIVITIES.
- 7:25TYPES OF ACTIVITIES. HE DIDN’T KNOW WHAT WAS IN THE
- 7:26HE DIDN’T KNOW WHAT WAS IN THE PRESIDENT’S MIND AT THE TIME.
- 7:27PRESIDENT’S MIND AT THE TIME. HE DIDN’T KNOW HOW THE PRESIDENT
- 7:28HE DIDN’T KNOW HOW THE PRESIDENT WAS TRYING TO MISUSE HIS
- 7:31WAS TRYING TO MISUSE HIS INTERACTIONS WITH HENRY
- 7:32INTERACTIONS WITH HENRY PETERSEN.
- 7:32PETERSEN. SO I THINK YOU TO SORT OF GIVE
- 7:34SO I THINK YOU TO SORT OF GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.
- 7:35HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. AT THE SAME TIME, THOUGH, AS YOU
- 7:38AT THE SAME TIME, THOUGH, AS YOU HIGHLIGHTED FROM THE PIECE,
- 7:40HIGHLIGHTED FROM THE PIECE, THESE TYPES OF INTERACTIONS ARE
- 7:43THESE TYPES OF INTERACTIONS ARE DANGEROUS FOR EVERYBODY.
- 7:44DANGEROUS FOR EVERYBODY. THEY’RE DANGEROUS FOR THE
- 7:45THEY’RE DANGEROUS FOR THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE THEY CAN LEAD
- 7:46PRESIDENT BECAUSE THEY CAN LEAD DOWN THIS ROAD THAT WE SAW
- 7:49DOWN THIS ROAD THAT WE SAW HAPPENED WITH PRESIDENT NIXON,
- 7:51HAPPENED WITH PRESIDENT NIXON, AND THEY’RE ALSO POTENTIALLY
- 7:53AND THEY’RE ALSO POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF
- 7:55DANGEROUS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FOR THE INTEGRITY OF
- 7:57JUSTICE, FOR THE INTEGRITY OF THE INVESTIGATION.
- 7:57THE INVESTIGATION. AT LEAST ONE TIME SIGNIFICANTLY
- 7:59AT LEAST ONE TIME SIGNIFICANTLY PRESIDENT NIXON SPECIFICALLY
- 8:00PRESIDENT NIXON SPECIFICALLY TOLD HENRY PETERSEN DO NOT
- 8:02TOLD HENRY PETERSEN DO NOT INVESTIGATE ANYTHING HAVING TO
- 8:04INVESTIGATE ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH THE BREAK-IN AT DANIEL
- 8:09DO WITH THE BREAK-IN AT DANIEL ELLSBERG’S PSYCHIATRIST OFFICE
- 8:10ELLSBERG’S PSYCHIATRIST OFFICE WHEN PETERSEN TOLD NIXON THAT
- 8:12WHEN PETERSEN TOLD NIXON THAT DEAN HAD TOLD THE PROSECUTORS
- 8:14DEAN HAD TOLD THE PROSECUTORS ABOUT THAT.
- 8:15ABOUT THAT. PRESIDENT NIXON SAID NO, STAY
- 8:16PRESIDENT NIXON SAID NO, STAY AWAY I FROM THAT.
- 8:17AWAY I FROM THAT. DO NOT INVESTIGATE THAT THAT’S
- 8:19DO NOT INVESTIGATE THAT THAT’S OUTSIDE YOUR MANDATE.
- 8:20OUTSIDE YOUR MANDATE. SO HE WAS ACTUALLY ABLE TO CON
- 8:23SO HE WAS ACTUALLY ABLE TO CON STRICT SIGNIFICANTLY A PART OF
- 8:24STRICT SIGNIFICANTLY A PART OF THE INVESTIGATION.
- 8:25THE INVESTIGATION. SO IT’S DAVIS FOR ALL SIDES OF
- 8:27SO IT’S DAVIS FOR ALL SIDES OF THE INVESTIGATION WHICH IS WHY
- 8:29THE INVESTIGATION WHICH IS WHY OVER THE YEARS THERE HAS BEEN A
- 8:30OVER THE YEARS THERE HAS BEEN A HISTORY SINCE WATERGATE, SINCE
- 8:32HISTORY SINCE WATERGATE, SINCE THESE THINGS CAME TO LIGHT OF
- 8:33THESE THINGS CAME TO LIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THE WHITE
- 8:34THE DEPARTMENT AND THE WHITE HOUSE BEING VERY CAUTIOUS ABOUT
- 8:35HOUSE BEING VERY CAUTIOUS ABOUT WHAT THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE
- 8:38WHAT THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE TWO
- 8:39INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE TWO ORGANIZATIONS IS AND HOW THAT’S
- 8:41ORGANIZATIONS IS AND HOW THAT’S REGULATED.
- 8:42REGULATED. ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU’VE GOT AN
- 8:43ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU’VE GOT AN INVESTIGATION GOING ON THAT
- 8:44INVESTIGATION GOING ON THAT TOUCHES THE WHITE HOUSE.
- 8:45TOUCHES THE WHITE HOUSE. >> AS A REGULATED MATTER, AND
- 8:47>> AS A REGULATED MATTER, AND I’M NOT ASKING YOU TO COMMENT ON
- 8:49I’M NOT ASKING YOU TO COMMENT ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
- 8:50THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SPECIFICALLY, I KNOW YOU’RE
- 8:52SPECIFICALLY, I KNOW YOU’RE CONSTRAINED FROM BEING ABLE TO
- 8:53CONSTRAINED FROM BEING ABLE TO DO THAT HERE.
- 8:53DO THAT HERE. BUT AS A MATTER THAT YOU SAY IS
- 8:56BUT AS A MATTER THAT YOU SAY IS REGULATED NOW IN TERMS OF
- 8:57REGULATED NOW IN TERMS OF CONTACTS BETWEEN THE WHITE HOUSE
- 8:58CONTACTS BETWEEN THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, IF
- 9:00AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, IF THERE WERE VIOLATIONS ON THAT,
- 9:01THERE WERE VIOLATIONS ON THAT, IF THERE WERE SOMEBODY AT A HIGH
- 9:02IF THERE WERE SOMEBODY AT A HIGH LEVEL IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
- 9:04LEVEL IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WHO WAS HAVING SECRET
- 9:06WHO WAS HAVING SECRET COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE WHITE
- 9:07COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE WHITE HOUSE ABOUT AN INVESTIGATION
- 9:08HOUSE ABOUT AN INVESTIGATION THAT INVOLVED THE WHITE HOUSE,
- 9:09THAT INVOLVED THE WHITE HOUSE, THAT WOULD BE AGAINST JUSTICE
- 9:11THAT WOULD BE AGAINST JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RULES.
- 9:12DEPARTMENT RULES. THAT’S THE SORT OF THING THAT
- 9:14THAT’S THE SORT OF THING THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT THE INSPECTOR
- 9:15YOU WOULD EXPECT THE INSPECTOR GENERAL TO LOOK INTO IF THERE
- 9:17GENERAL TO LOOK INTO IF THERE WERE CREDIBLE ALLEGATIONS OF
- 9:18WERE CREDIBLE ALLEGATIONS OF THAT.
- 9:19THAT. >> JUST SPEAKING HYPOTHETICALLY
- 9:20>> JUST SPEAKING HYPOTHETICALLY AND GENERICALLY?
- 9:21AND GENERICALLY? >> YES.
- 9:21>> YES. >> POTENTIALLY, YES.
- 9:23>> POTENTIALLY, YES. THE IG COULD LOOK AT THAT.
- 9:24THE IG COULD LOOK AT THAT. THE IG HAS A BROAD SCOPE OF
- 9:27THE IG HAS A BROAD SCOPE OF AUTHORITY AND COULD LOOK AT
- 9:28AUTHORITY AND COULD LOOK AT THAT.
- 9:28THAT. >> JAMES BAKER, FORMER GENERAL
- 9:29>> JAMES BAKER, FORMER GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FBI.
- 9:30COUNSEL OF THE FBI. AGAIN, A MAN WHO DOES NOT DO
- 9:32AGAIN, A MAN WHO DOES NOT DO INTRODUCE LIKE THIS.
- 9:33INTRODUCE LIKE THIS. I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU MAKING
- 9:34I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU MAKING TIME TO BE HERE AND TALKING TO
- 9:36TIME TO BE HERE AND TALKING TO US ABOUT THIS PIECE.
- 9:36US ABOUT THIS PIECE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
- 9:37THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU, RACHEL.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Richard Nixon Used DOJ Official To Track Watergate Investigation | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC by MS NOW, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,618 words across 380 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.