Prince Harry loses case against the Daily Mail | BBC News — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Harry,
- 0:01>> it's the best result I think the Daily
- 0:03Mail could have imagined. It's a
- 0:05complete and catastrophic uh defeat for
- 0:09Prince Harry and the other claimments.
- 0:11>> It's a huge huge loss on both sides.
- 0:13There were no winners from a financial
- 0:14basis.
- 0:15>> The court isn't deciding whether people
- 0:17feel agrieved. Clearly, they do. Uh it's
- 0:20deciding whether there's evidence, not
- 0:23merely suspicion. But he certainly
- 0:26doesn't subscribe to the traditional
- 0:28royal mantra of never complain, never
- 0:30explain.
- 0:32>> So, Prince Harry has lost his latest
- 0:34legal case against the media, taking on
- 0:37the publishers of the Daily Mail and
- 0:39Mail on Sunday. We will look at the
- 0:41background behind the verdict, what it
- 0:43means for Prince Harry, and the ongoing
- 0:46tensions between the Sussex's and the
- 0:48royal family. First, what actually
- 0:51happened today? Well, our correspondent
- 0:53Helena Wilkinson is outside the court
- 0:54for us. And Helena, tell us about the
- 0:57verdict.
- 1:01>> Yes. So, a trial took place here,
- 1:03Matthew, at the high court earlier this
- 1:05year. The claimants in the case, seven
- 1:08claimants, high-profile claimments,
- 1:10including Prince Harry, Sir Elton John,
- 1:13his husband David Furnish, and Elizabeth
- 1:17Hurley among the claimants. and they
- 1:19took Associated Newspapers Limited, the
- 1:22publishers of the Daily Mail and the
- 1:24Mail on Sunday to court. They were suing
- 1:26them for a breach of privacy. Uh the
- 1:30judgment today handed down by the judge,
- 1:32Mr. Justice Nicholan. Uh and he
- 1:34dismissed their cases and all seven uh
- 1:38complainants lost their high court case
- 1:41against uh the publisher of the Daily
- 1:44Mail. So they failed to prove the
- 1:46allegations and all seven of them lost
- 1:49the case.
- 1:51>> Well, this is a case that stems back
- 1:53more than 20 years. Articles like these
- 1:56targeting some of his former girlfriends
- 1:58were at the core of Prince Harry's
- 2:00claims that reporters working for the
- 2:03Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday used
- 2:04unlawful methods for getting information
- 2:07for those stories. And it wasn't just
- 2:09Harry. As Helena was saying, his fellow
- 2:12plaintiffs included a number of
- 2:13well-known figures including Sir Elton
- 2:15John, Sir Simon Hughes, Liz Hurley,
- 2:17Sadie Frost, and Baroness Dorene
- 2:20Lawrence. They claimed the paper used
- 2:22phone tapping, intercepted voicemails,
- 2:25and obtained personal information
- 2:27through deception, something the paper
- 2:29has always, always denied. Well, as we
- 2:32heard, the judge didn't think the
- 2:34plaintiffs had enough evidence to prove
- 2:36those claims. Well, Helena, tell us more
- 2:39then about the details. It was a monthsl
- 2:41long trial, wasn't it, with emotional
- 2:44testimony.
- 2:48Yes, it was. And Prince Harry himself
- 2:50flew in from the US to give evidence
- 2:52over a couple of hours uh during the
- 2:54case. He became emotional towards the
- 2:57end of his evidence. He put forward as
- 2:59part of his claim 14 newspaper articles
- 3:03which he alleged uh the information
- 3:05within them he said was gathered by
- 3:08unlawful methods and it was then that
- 3:11private information he said that ended
- 3:13up in newspapers. Uh the other claimants
- 3:16uh many of them also gave evidence as
- 3:18well during the case. A very expensive
- 3:21long-running case that actually goes
- 3:23back four years. That's when the case uh
- 3:26first came to the four. Uh in his
- 3:29ruling, Mr. Justice Nicklin today said
- 3:31that the allegations were serious and
- 3:34required more convincing evidence before
- 3:37being proven, but the claimants had
- 3:39failed to do that. And he also said that
- 3:42uh in particular to do with one of
- 3:45Prince Harry's claims that there might
- 3:46have been suspicions. He might have been
- 3:48suspicious about how that information
- 3:51got into a newspaper, but that simply
- 3:53wasn't enough to prove the case.
- 3:55>> And Hannah, he lost today, but this
- 3:58isn't the first legal action Prince
- 4:00Harry has brought against the media. So,
- 4:02remind us about how those other cases
- 4:04have gone.
- 4:07>> Yes. Two other big court battles he has
- 4:09had before. In 2023,
- 4:12Prince Harry won 13 15 claims in the
- 4:15case against Mirror Greek newspapers of
- 4:18unlawfully gathering information for
- 4:21stories published about him. And he also
- 4:24settled out of court uh just hours
- 4:27before the trial was due to take place
- 4:29with the publisher of the Sun newspaper.
- 4:31and they paid a substantial uh damages
- 4:35and apologized to the Duke of Sussex as
- 4:37well in a longunning legal battle over
- 4:40claims of unlawful intrusion into his
- 4:43life. Important uh to just go back to
- 4:46the case today that Associated
- 4:48Newspapers Limited have put out a
- 4:50statement in response. They have said
- 4:53that the judgment today it is a
- 4:56magnificent vindication of the Daily
- 4:58Mail's journalism and they go on to say
- 5:00as the judgment clearly shows every
- 5:03single article was legitimately sourced.
- 5:06>> So Helena is this the last of these
- 5:09cases brought by the Duke of Sussex.
- 5:13>> It's a good question. We are not aware
- 5:15of any further cases where Prince Harry
- 5:18is intending to take on any other
- 5:21newspaper group. As I mentioned, he has
- 5:23had success uh previously with some
- 5:26newspaper groups. Today, no success. He
- 5:28has failed. He's lost his case. Uh so,
- 5:31we're not aware of any. So, this
- 5:33potentially could be the last time uh we
- 5:35see him take on such a court case.
- 5:38>> Back to you in a moment, but Prince
- 5:39Harry happens to be in London today,
- 5:41starting a week of engagements at a
- 5:43number of his UK charities. Well, his
- 5:46first engagement came at exactly the
- 5:48same time as that verdict was being read
- 5:50out, an event for the Invictus Games,
- 5:52his charity for military injured
- 5:54veterans. How do we remove barriers? How
- 5:58do we create systems that don't just
- 6:00respond to injury, but enable people to
- 6:02thrive afterwards?
- 6:04How do we ensure that recovery isn't
- 6:06defined by a program with an end date,
- 6:09but by a lifetime of opportunity? But
- 6:13whilst he's here in the UK, there's been
- 6:15some confusion about where he's actually
- 6:17staying. Early on Monday morning, the
- 6:19Duke of Sussex official spokesperson
- 6:22said Harry would be staying at
- 6:24Buckingham Palace. Minutes later, the
- 6:26palace said that wasn't true. An offer
- 6:29that was on the table for Harry to stay
- 6:31had expired on Friday. The palace said
- 6:34they needed more time for a guest to
- 6:37actually stay. So, let's go back to
- 6:39Helena. What is actually going on here
- 6:41and where is Harry now staying?
- 6:45>> Well, he arrived in the UK yesterday. It
- 6:48was a bit of a messy, complicated back
- 6:50and forth between his team and the
- 6:52palace as well in terms of where he was
- 6:55going to be staying. As you mentioned,
- 6:57uh the initial plan was he said he
- 6:59agreed or his team said they agreed that
- 7:01he would stay uh at the royal residence.
- 7:04very quickly. Uh the palace said that
- 7:06was not possible because he hadn't met
- 7:08the deadline. Uh we know he's staying on
- 7:11private premises, not at Buckingham
- 7:13Palace. Uh contrary to what his team had
- 7:16initially said. Uh we know when Prince
- 7:19Harry has come to the UK on previous
- 7:21trips. Uh he has uh checked into hotels
- 7:24and also stayed with friends.
- 7:26>> And what about Megan and the children?
- 7:29They aren't here, are they?
- 7:33They're not at the moment. The initial
- 7:35plan was for uh all of them to come to
- 7:38the UK at the start. So to join uh
- 7:41Prince Harry yesterday when he arrived.
- 7:43They are not in the UK at the moment.
- 7:45That decision came after uh Prince Harry
- 7:48was told that uh he would not receive
- 7:51publicly funded police protection while
- 7:54he was in the UK. Prince Harry has
- 7:56always said he wants to bring his wife,
- 7:59the Duchess of Sussex, and their two
- 8:00children to the UK. Uh so he's not here,
- 8:04they're not here rather in London. Uh
- 8:06there is a question as to whether they
- 8:08might join Prince Harry when he travels
- 8:10up to the Midlands later this week, but
- 8:12that's yet to be confirmed.
- 8:14>> Helena, a final thought. Where does this
- 8:17leave the relationship between the
- 8:19Sussex's and the Palace now?
- 8:24Well, I think Matthew, if you look at
- 8:25that very messy back and forth uh even
- 8:29before Prince Harry arrived in the UK,
- 8:32uh you get the sense that on both sides
- 8:35there is an element of distrust between
- 8:37the two sides and also it appears a bit
- 8:41of a lack of communication with them. Uh
- 8:44we don't know yet if Prince Harry will
- 8:46meet his father, the king, during the
- 8:48trip. It had been um expected that he
- 8:51might do, but that has yet to be
- 8:53confirmed. If that does take place, it
- 8:55may be that that is a private meeting,
- 8:58but it still seems based on what we've
- 9:00seen just over the last couple of days,
- 9:03uh that relationship relationships
- 9:06between them, uh the two sides remain
- 9:09strained.
- 9:10>> Helena Wilkerson, thanks for taking us
- 9:12through all of that. And that is all you
- 9:14need to know about Prince Harry's legal
- 9:16loss and the state of the relationship
- 9:18with the royal family.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Prince Harry loses case against the Daily Mail | BBC News by BBC News, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,502 words across 226 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.