Pick One Idea and Go Deep — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:01[music]
- 0:09>> Hi, I'm John and I'm a partner at YC. I
- 0:12often meet founders who have lots of
- 0:14ideas about what to work on and can't
- 0:16decide between them.
- 0:17Sometimes they're working on multiple
- 0:19things.
- 0:20Often they'll say that they're waiting
- 0:22to find the best idea before fully
- 0:24committing, but it's extremely hard to
- 0:26make meaningful progress on a startup
- 0:29without committing to a single idea.
- 0:32So in this video, I'm going to give you
- 0:35a rubric for how to stop overthinking,
- 0:37pick an idea, commit to it, and then
- 0:41figure out fast whether it's actually
- 0:43working. The most important piece of
- 0:45advice I'd give to founders struggling
- 0:47to pick a startup idea is
- 0:49don't overthink it. Overthinking a
- 0:51startup in the earliest days can take
- 0:54many forms, but here a couple of the
- 0:56most common failure modes I see. The
- 0:58first is thinking that you need to find
- 1:00the perfect idea. In some ways, this is
- 1:03an understandable impulse.
- 1:05Startups are hard, so shouldn't you
- 1:07figure out the best idea before
- 1:09committing? The problem with this
- 1:10approach is that it's impossible to
- 1:12figure out the perfect idea in the
- 1:15abstract. You can only figure out what
- 1:17you should be working on by making
- 1:19contact with reality and getting
- 1:22feedback from customers. The second
- 1:24overthink is am I the perfect founder
- 1:27for this?
- 1:28It's true that founder market fit
- 1:29matters. A non-technical founder likely
- 1:32won't be the right person to come up
- 1:34with a killer dev tool startup idea, for
- 1:36example. But often founders, especially
- 1:39second-time founders, weaponize this
- 1:41line against themselves. They convince
- 1:44themselves that they need a decade of
- 1:46domain experience before they can start.
- 1:48The truth is, you don't. If you pick an
- 1:51idea you're curious about, go extremely
- 1:53deep,
- 1:55and most importantly talk to customers.
- 1:57It's often possible to develop
- 1:59extraordinary knowledge in a short
- 2:01amount of time. We see incredible
- 2:03examples of this all the time at YC.
- 2:06Take Blake Scholl, the CEO of Boom
- 2:09Supersonic. Blake spent his early career
- 2:12working on ad tech at companies like
- 2:14Amazon and Groupon before deciding to
- 2:17work on commercializing supersonic
- 2:20flight. Lots of people probably thought
- 2:22he was crazy.
- 2:23But now Boom is a billion-dollar
- 2:25company. So don't let the question of
- 2:27whether you're allowed to work on
- 2:29something stop you from starting. Once
- 2:31you've stopped overthinking your ideas,
- 2:34it's important to commit to just one.
- 2:37Often, I meet founders who are working
- 2:39on multiple ideas at once because they
- 2:41believe that this is the best way to
- 2:43figure out which one will actually work.
- 2:45There are a couple problems with this
- 2:46approach. The most serious is that it
- 2:49tends to produce bad data. If you don't
- 2:52actually go deep on an idea, but instead
- 2:55juggle it with several others, you won't
- 2:57get good signal about whether what
- 3:00you're doing actually works. And if you
- 3:02don't get good signal, then you could
- 3:04either prematurely talk yourself out of
- 3:06a good idea or convince yourself that a
- 3:09bad one is worth continuing. The
- 3:11solution to this
- 3:13is to go in depth first. If you're
- 3:15trying to decide between several ideas,
- 3:17all of which look equally attractive,
- 3:20pick one idea and go deep on it. What do
- 3:22I mean by going deep?
- 3:24The first thing is that you should burn
- 3:26the other boats. That is, you should
- 3:28explicitly foreclose your other startup
- 3:31idea options. Stop working on them. Tell
- 3:34any customers that you've pivoted and
- 3:36work with single-minded focus on the
- 3:39idea you've chosen. One way to think
- 3:41about going deep is that it should feel
- 3:43like wearing a new skin.
- 3:45You should become an almost
- 3:46unrecognizable version of yourself. This
- 3:50could mean changing your company's name,
- 3:52your emails, your website, and even your
- 3:55internal narrative about why you're
- 3:57building a startup in the first place.
- 3:58For example, I worked with a startup
- 4:01called GovDash that helps customers win
- 4:03government contracts. They pivoted at
- 4:06least five times before finding this
- 4:08idea. And each time they explored
- 4:10something new, they changed their
- 4:12company name and how they talked about
- 4:14their mission. At one point, I forgot
- 4:17how to get in touch with them because
- 4:18they changed their email addresses with
- 4:20each pivot. By truly becoming domain
- 4:23experts in government procurement, their
- 4:25fifth idea worked so well that they
- 4:27could barely keep up with demand. They
- 4:29recently raised a Series B to scale the
- 4:32business and meet that demand. Once
- 4:34you've decided to fully commit to an
- 4:36idea and go deep, how do you know if
- 4:38you're actually doing it well?
- 4:40The high watermark I use to help
- 4:42founders answer this question is could
- 4:44you actually run your customer's
- 4:46business? Say you want to build voice
- 4:48customer service agents for cleaning
- 4:50services. The question isn't just
- 4:52whether you've talked to 20 owners. The
- 4:54question is if I dropped you into a
- 4:56cleaning business tomorrow, would you
- 4:59know how to run it? Do you know what
- 5:02their daily crises are? Do you know
- 5:04whether answering the phone is a top
- 5:06five problem?
- 5:08Do you know how much business they lose
- 5:10when a call goes unanswered and what
- 5:12they would actually pay to never lose
- 5:14another one? These are the kinds of
- 5:16questions you need to be able to answer
- 5:18with very high confidence.
- 5:20Another way to think about this is could
- 5:22you teach a class on the problem you're
- 5:24solving? Are you one of the most
- 5:26informed people in the world on the
- 5:28subject? Getting to this level will
- 5:30involve lots of conversations with
- 5:32customers and sometimes even literally
- 5:35doing the job yourself.
- 5:37But don't obsess over needing to talk to
- 5:39hundreds of customers before writing
- 5:41code.
- 5:42The goal is to do both at the same time
- 5:45in a tight loop. Deep understanding of
- 5:48customer needs, then product delivery,
- 5:50then deeper understanding of customer
- 5:52needs,
- 5:53then better product delivery. Real
- 5:55customers using your product produces
- 5:57concrete data that will complement your
- 6:00abstract knowledge, giving you a sense
- 6:02of whether what you're building is
- 6:04actually working. Once you're going deep
- 6:07on an idea, there's several ways to
- 6:09validate whether it's worth continuing
- 6:11to work on. The most obvious one is pull
- 6:14from customers, but there's several
- 6:16other qualities of good ideas in the AI
- 6:18era that you should look out for as you
- 6:21go. The first is that the idea sits at
- 6:24the edge of what models can do today.
- 6:27This might mean that your product barely
- 6:29works on today's frontier models, but
- 6:31will clearly improve as they get better.
- 6:34You should understand the bottlenecks
- 6:36impeding your product's performance
- 6:38intimately. If a particular bottleneck
- 6:41doesn't clear the way you hoped,
- 6:43solving that might become the company.
- 6:46This is a version of Paul Graham's
- 6:47well-known quote that you should live in
- 6:49the future and then build what's
- 6:51missing. The second quality of a good
- 6:53idea is that it should verticalize. By
- 6:56this I mean that it should ultimately
- 6:58sell an outcome.
- 6:59For example, providing insurance or
- 7:01medical care rather than just software.
- 7:04In the AI era, the cost of producing
- 7:07software is going to zero. So, the
- 7:09things that actually become valuable
- 7:11aren't just software for X. They're
- 7:14customer trust, licenses, regulatory
- 7:18permission, and outcome ownership. So,
- 7:20if you want to get into the insurance
- 7:22space, don't build software for
- 7:24insurance companies, just be the
- 7:26insurer. Similarly, rather than selling
- 7:29back office software for banks, just be
- 7:31the bank. One example of this is Corgi
- 7:34Insurance, an AI-powered commercial
- 7:36insurance company from YC's Summer 24
- 7:39batch. They They not content with being
- 7:41a tech-enabled broker or even a managing
- 7:44general agent because that was just
- 7:46owning a part of the solution. Instead,
- 7:49they set an ambitious goal of owning
- 7:51everything from underwriting to
- 7:53providing customer service, the entire
- 7:55commercial insurance stack, and even
- 7:57took the unprecedented step of acquiring
- 8:00an insurance carrier during their YC
- 8:03batch to make it happen. Being the
- 8:04full-stack insurance company allows
- 8:07Corgi to underwrite any insurance line
- 8:09in any vertical with a fraction of the
- 8:12head count of traditional carriers.
- 8:15They can offer far better pricing, much
- 8:17faster turnaround, and own all of the
- 8:20economics. That brings me to the third
- 8:22quality of a good idea.
- 8:24It should be the most ambitious version
- 8:26of itself. It may seem unintuitive, but
- 8:29the cost of pursuing a wildly ambitious
- 8:32startup idea and the cost of pursuing a
- 8:34modest one are roughly the same.
- 8:37They're both extremely hard. They both
- 8:39place extreme demands on your time. So,
- 8:42aim at the version that, if it works,
- 8:45rewrites a sector of the economy.
- 8:48Because that's also the version that
- 8:49protects you from competitors, attracts
- 8:52the best talent, and has a moat worth
- 8:54building. This could mean building and
- 8:56selling into the most regulated
- 8:58industries, like legal, healthcare, or
- 9:01financial services, or taking on very
- 9:04large incumbents, like a $10 billion
- 9:07legacy SaaS company, or building hard
- 9:09tech, like robotics for space assembly.
- 9:12Now, what if you do all of this and the
- 9:15idea fails? The good news is that you'll
- 9:18be in a dramatically better position
- 9:20than where you started. First, you have
- 9:23unambiguous customer data. You know
- 9:26whether there's actually a hair on fire
- 9:27problem in this space or whether you
- 9:30just talked yourself into thinking there
- 9:31was. You'll have real conviction to base
- 9:35a pivot on
- 9:36and a better sense of how to execute
- 9:38going forward. But more importantly, you
- 9:41will often come away from the process
- 9:43with a new idea that will actually work.
- 9:46When most founders begin, they're
- 9:47solving surface-level pain points. The
- 9:50real opportunities are almost always the
- 9:53deeper structural problems. In other
- 9:55words, going deep isn't primarily a
- 9:57process for validating the idea you
- 9:59started with.
- 10:01It's a way to find the better idea
- 10:02underneath. This almost always happens,
- 10:05especially if you're at the forefront of
- 10:07what models can do today. You'll notice
- 10:10the bottlenecks, the gaps, the dev tools
- 10:13nobody's built. And one of those could
- 10:16turn out to be the actual company.
- 10:18Here's what I want you to take away from
- 10:20this video. First, stop trying to find
- 10:22the perfect idea.
- 10:24Just pick one. Then, burn the other
- 10:26boats.
- 10:27Learn everything you can about the
- 10:28customer and try to execute for them. In
- 10:31the early idea fog, where you can only
- 10:34see 10 ft in front of you, the
- 10:36temptation is to take a few cautious
- 10:38steps in every direction. Sample a
- 10:40little here, a little there, stay close
- 10:43to home. The problem is that gives you
- 10:45almost no information. What actually
- 10:47works is to commit to one direction and
- 10:50walk fast. You're not guaranteed to end
- 10:53up in the right place, but you generate
- 10:55much more information per unit of time.
- 10:58And when you're walking, you might
- 11:00arrive at a better destination,
- 11:02one you couldn't have seen from the
- 11:04start. The worst failure mode isn't
- 11:07being wrong. It's not making a decision.
- 11:10Spinning your wheels,
- 11:12dabbling between ideas and never going
- 11:14deep enough on any one of them to learn
- 11:16anything. So, pick one and go deep.
- 11:19Thanks for watching.
- 11:21>> [music]
- 11:27[music]
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Pick One Idea and Go Deep by Y Combinator, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,849 words across 298 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.