Nvidia's Jensen Huang Scandal & Anthropic's IPO Deflates to $1.4 Trillion — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Welcome back to the Market Maker
- 0:02podcast. And for two straight years, the
- 0:05institutional playbook was pretty
- 0:06simple. The S&P 500 was essentially
- 0:09Nvidia in an oversized trench coat where
- 0:13Jensen Wang went global liquidity would
- 0:16follow until the day we're recording
- 0:18this, that was yesterday. Last week,
- 0:21Wall Street stared straight into the
- 0:23macro abyss. The NASDAQ 100 took a
- 0:25historic 6.4% 4% single day beating
- 0:28wiping out I love this stat Pier $2.3
- 0:31trillion dollars in market cap as
- 0:34post-election jitters and data center
- 0:36skeptimism triggered maximum panic but
- 0:39yesterday brought a violent counter
- 0:41punch the S&P 500 actually rallied 2.4%
- 0:444% its best session since April and chip
- 0:47indices jumped 7%. Yet in the middle of
- 0:50all the green there was a glaring red
- 0:53anomaly and that was Nvidia. Uh they
- 0:56were down heavy at one point I think
- 0:58like 8 9%. They fell 4.3 at the close.
- 1:02That kind of divergence has happened
- 1:04exactly just three times since 2001.
- 1:08And I love this. I saw a journalist
- 1:10saying this. The umbilical cord between
- 1:14the market and its undisputed king has
- 1:17been snapped. And the catalyst isn't a
- 1:20missed earnings print. It's an espionage
- 1:23scandal. An affair indeed. Admitted by
- 1:27Jensen Huang, an FBI inquiry and an
- 1:30Imperial CEO presiding over a board with
- 1:32no chairman and no clear successor.
- 1:36Meanwhile, on the software side, we've
- 1:38had Dario and Ananthropic walking
- 1:40directly into the storm. Their IPO road
- 1:43show kicks off this week. Whispered
- 1:45valuations have deflated from $2
- 1:48trillion down to the latest we've heard
- 1:51in the FT just an hour ago from
- 1:53recording. It was 1.4. I heard some
- 1:55rumors talking about 1.1 earlier in the
- 1:58week. their defense obviously dropping a
- 2:01new methos fable model doesn't hurt on
- 2:04the eve of the tour uh to engineer the
- 2:07optics and defend against open AI with
- 2:09Goldman Sachs the lead left also pumping
- 2:12some impressive revenue forecasts that
- 2:15they think for the AI giant so is the AI
- 2:18trade maturing or is the circular
- 2:20financing machine surely firing showing
- 2:23some cracks we're going to break down
- 2:25the decoupling the boardroom crisis and
- 2:27the trillion dollar road shows So,
- 2:29appears caught your debate.
- 2:31The uh the ball bear case.
- 2:34>> Oh, yeah.
- 2:35>> I mean, listeners shouldn't even need to
- 2:37know who side I'm picking.
- 2:40>> Uh I'm the I'm the perma hyperscaler.
- 2:44So, there's no holding this back.
- 2:46>> It was so Stephen sent me a message. I
- 2:49think there was it's got to be the the
- 2:51funniest I it's it's obviously I'm I'm
- 2:54I'm going with the piss taking side of
- 2:56things here, but there was a comment on
- 2:58I think it was on YouTube and it was
- 3:00like cuz yeah we we dropped the poll,
- 3:02right? Who are you with me or Steven?
- 3:04And they replied
- 3:06um it's like the Messi Ronaldo debate,
- 3:10you know, you can't you you can't choose
- 3:13is was their uh was their
- 3:16theme. I think were they talking about
- 3:18our arguments or uh or or ourselves? I'm
- 3:21sure
- 3:22>> your stature maybe. But uh yeah, I'm the
- 3:24Messi of those two. That's for sure.
- 3:26>> I thought I thought it was a slam dunk.
- 3:27I thought there's no Messi running out
- 3:28of debate here. Messi is the goat,
- 3:30right?
- 3:31>> Yeah, but clearly [laughter]
- 3:34>> going to get some comments on that.
- 3:36[laughter]
- 3:38Um but talking about goats or maybe
- 3:41fallen goats, goats chopped out at the
- 3:44knees. Yeah, Jensen's had a bit of a
- 3:46shocker, hasn't he?
- 3:47>> Well, he he has this week. You know, by
- 3:49the time this hits people's ears two
- 3:51weeks down the line, I'm sure it would
- 3:53just be a forgotten blip.
- 3:55>> What affair. Well, there is one there is
- 3:59one way this could I mean, you know, I
- 4:03Yeah, I think you're right. What you're
- 4:05implying is this is just going to be
- 4:06like yesterday's news pretty quickly and
- 4:09and he's, you know, lines being thrown
- 4:12out. too big to or too big to fire is is
- 4:16the latest, isn't it? Which is
- 4:17absolutely true. Unless
- 4:21it does go
- 4:24if the FBI who are investigating this,
- 4:26of course, and there's obviously a few
- 4:28different angles, but one of them is
- 4:29that this this woman was a spy uh
- 4:32working for the Chinese. If that turns
- 4:35out to be true and it turns out he was I
- 4:41would assume inadvertently
- 4:43uh passing information then that's
- 4:46that's that is a real problem. uh and
- 4:50the problem being compounded by the
- 4:54incredibly unusual structure of the
- 4:57board and um he's the Nvidia, they're
- 5:01the only
- 5:03company in the S&P 100,
- 5:06right? So that's the 100 biggest
- 5:07companies by market cap in the US.
- 5:09They're the only one that doesn't have a
- 5:10chairman.
- 5:12And then on top of that, yeah, you've
- 5:14obviously got this situation where the
- 5:17the directors on the board, well,
- 5:18they've been on that board for like
- 5:22since the '9s. Um, the average tenure, I
- 5:25think if you cross go across the whole
- 5:27board, the average tenure is 15 years.
- 5:29That's double the usual average across
- 5:33the rest of the S&P 500. So, it's a bit
- 5:35unusual. and he's, you know, he he's
- 5:37he's got quite a flat sort of um I would
- 5:40say management structure and so he's got
- 5:4260 people that directly reporting to
- 5:45him. Um so he Yeah. In terms of that
- 5:48business and operating that business, he
- 5:50is too big to fire unless he gets
- 5:53arrested.
- 5:55>> Yeah. So yeah, what I mean one of the
- 5:58ways I'd read it is that
- 6:00>> you talk about keyman risk and I was
- 6:02looking at how much of Nvidia does he
- 6:04own because you would assume kind of
- 6:06like Zuckerberg, Elon, others you go
- 6:09right something super meaningful
- 6:11>> and they have super voting shares and
- 6:13all these sorts of things meaning that
- 6:15they get diluted they still have overall
- 6:17control. He's actually the opposite owns
- 6:203.6% 6% stake worth a measily
- 6:25$150 billion dollars. He's been short
- 6:27changed there. Uh I would say
- 6:30>> but I guess it's so that's one thing. So
- 6:33he actually is even though he's he's
- 6:35kind of outsized in his role in terms of
- 6:37his personality but because he is the
- 6:40pinup boy
- 6:41>> of this whole thing. And third point of
- 6:44terminology I really
- 6:46>> kind of I quite enjoyed reading this
- 6:48morning on the commute was
- 6:50>> Nvidia has acted as a de facto central
- 6:54bank of AI.
- 6:55>> Yeah.
- 6:55>> And I thought that was great in the fact
- 6:58that it's directly financing customers
- 7:00extending loans including Mega Speed uh
- 7:03I think two years ago which is this
- 7:05Chinese firm. They've taken equity
- 7:07stakes in other firms. They're
- 7:09backstopping data center leases. So that
- 7:12whole thing about too big to fire, I
- 7:15mean that came out of you've always got
- 7:17to have context here. Who is saying
- 7:19these things and it's Sequoa's Sha
- 7:23Maguire who I'm sure you've got your
- 7:25little table of investors in the early
- 7:28days of a lot of these firms. I'm sure
- 7:30Sequoa's got their, you know, a little
- 7:33bit of capital capital on the table here
- 7:35with some exposure.
- 7:37So
- 7:38is that the thing though? Is it because
- 7:41you know the setup of the company could
- 7:43go on and survive without him. However,
- 7:47this isn't just an Nvidia story. Now,
- 7:49Nvidia is the center of a universe that
- 7:53is driving our economic universe,
- 7:55>> right?
- 7:55>> And so therefore, he's almost
- 7:57irreplaceable from a technological
- 7:59leadership standpoint.
- 8:01>> Yeah.
- 8:02>> Uh his capacity to navigate Washington
- 8:04diplomacy.
- 8:06I guess that's going to be the
- 8:07interesting one to watch. And how close
- 8:09is he now
- 8:10>> to this stuff?
- 8:12>> Yeah.
- 8:12>> But Trump is still around, by the way.
- 8:15>> And Trump wasn't exactly being super
- 8:17skeptical of some of Jensen's
- 8:20activities. Yeah. No comment. But they
- 8:24are they are too big to fail. Like
- 8:25forget Jensen for a second. They are too
- 8:27big to fail the business. It is so
- 8:31it's got its fingers in every single
- 8:33little pie of this AI boom. It's the
- 8:37absolute foundation of the whole thing.
- 8:40And if you remove the foundation,
- 8:43obviously the whole thing collapses. So
- 8:45that and and that's not just the AI
- 8:47boom, right? That that's the de facto
- 8:49economic growth story right now. So it's
- 8:52too big to fail. Um I think yeah, you
- 8:55mentioned that Jensen's role in that
- 8:58kind of being the sort of diplomatic.
- 9:01It's almost like the go-between between
- 9:03the Chinese and the US to be honest.
- 9:05um you know he's got to be yanked out of
- 9:08that sort of type of role immediately.
- 9:11So this will have a negative impact you
- 9:14know on obviously on the man himself but
- 9:18I would say on the company I'm just
- 9:19looking now terms of negative impact on
- 9:22the company uh it's down 5 a half% today
- 9:25when we started this podcast which was
- 9:28about what 3 4 minutes ago it was down
- 9:324%. So, it's now down five and a half.
- 9:35>> They've heard that we've gone live, so
- 9:37they quick.
- 9:39>> There's I'll point it out now. I do love
- 9:41a bit of technicals, but there is a
- 9:43monster technical support level in
- 9:46Nvidia's share price, which is the March
- 9:4830th low. It's the low of 2026.
- 9:51Um, and that was that's down at 165.
- 9:55We're trading 169, just broken down
- 9:57below 170. 165 is massive, huge level.
- 10:03Um, so yeah, we've we've obviously had a
- 10:05really really really steep reversal, a
- 10:08second big step to the downside after
- 10:10the one that we had obviously back in
- 10:12the last week.
- 10:14>> Well, look, let's talk about the context
- 10:16of this week and last week.
- 10:18>> Yeah,
- 10:18>> because the NASDAQ 100 6.4% one day
- 10:22fall.
- 10:24I mean, that saw the volatility index,
- 10:26the VIX to levels not seen since April
- 10:292025.
- 10:31think people have got a pretty good
- 10:32sense check of that even though there
- 10:34was we were there straight on it saying
- 10:37people are overlooking the data center
- 10:39you know legislation in certain key
- 10:41concentrated areas geographically in the
- 10:44US but now that's become the kind of
- 10:46what's being pinned on as the kind of
- 10:49catalyst if you like what about this
- 10:52reversal and decoupling that we've had
- 10:55you just mentioned Nvidia's down
- 10:57>> they were down yesterday but the NASDAQ
- 10:59had one of his best days in a long time.
- 11:01>> Yeah,
- 11:02>> that's not normally normal when an S&P
- 11:04has uh index weighted components of
- 11:08which Nvidia is one of the largest
- 11:10>> companies in the world.
- 11:11>> So the science or maths being if they
- 11:15fall, everyone falls.
- 11:16>> Yeah.
- 11:17>> And that's been highly correlated, but
- 11:18it wasn't the case and hasn't been in
- 11:20the last few sessions. Why is that?
- 11:22>> Yeah. It's it's you know what is the
- 11:24driving factor of the move? Um and
- 11:26actually if we switch to the S&P versus
- 11:28Nvidia rather than the NASDAQ, um the
- 11:31S&P rally 2%. Which was its best day,
- 11:34one of its best days. What did you say
- 11:35for anyway? For a long time, right? And
- 11:37Nvidia dropped 4.3% on the same day. So
- 11:40actually outside of May 2009, this
- 11:45divergence has almost never happened
- 11:48since Nvidia joined the S&P 500 back in
- 11:502001. So you've you've had a 25 year run
- 11:54where basically
- 11:56the correlation between Nvidia and the
- 11:59index is very strong and positive and
- 12:02it's become ever stronger and more
- 12:04positive as Nvidia has climbed up
- 12:06through the rankings to become the
- 12:08absolute top dog biggest component in
- 12:10the whole index right um so this is a
- 12:14fantastically unusual event because the
- 12:17reason for Nvidia's downside is this
- 12:20very specific story about its CEO and
- 12:23whilst yes that might have implications
- 12:25for right how's the business going to be
- 12:28run um what's Jensen's role at a more
- 12:31diplomatic level um you know is there
- 12:34going to be any sort of consumer
- 12:36backlash against Nvidia well we'll talk
- 12:38about that maybe in a minute no how can
- 12:40you backlash against Nvidia who what
- 12:43consumers buying GPUs no one right so
- 12:46but because of this very unique thing
- 12:48about an individual person This isn't a
- 12:52um this isn't a trade related to AI.
- 12:55Well, actually the reversal of the whole
- 12:57index was a rebound from the big step
- 13:00lower that we had on Friday. So, you got
- 13:02the whole market snapping and rebounding
- 13:04back from the heavy selloff from Friday.
- 13:07So the macro underlying theme is rebound
- 13:11risk on and you've then got a singular
- 13:14negative story that just so happens to
- 13:16be very negatively impacting the biggest
- 13:18company in the index which just for that
- 13:21singular reason is just gone in exactly
- 13:24the opposite direction. So some some
- 13:26stats to support what you're describing
- 13:28there. So Nvidia, well this has probably
- 13:31changed but at last check just under 7%
- 13:33of the S&P 500 and historically whenever
- 13:36Nvidia sheds more than 4% I falls more
- 13:41than 4% the S&P 500 declines by an
- 13:43average of 1.6.
- 13:45That's the normal relationship that it
- 13:47would have.
- 13:48>> But the divergence on Monday of this
- 13:50week the S&P was up 2.35 whereas Nvidia
- 13:54was down 4.3.
- 13:56So is this where that terminology people
- 13:59often talk about which is idiosyncratic
- 14:02>> in this case governance right
- 14:04>> themes yeah
- 14:05>> being that there is an explainable
- 14:07thing. So does this make you feel
- 14:10given the context of the debate you had
- 14:12with Steven and the
- 14:15>> frothliness of the market at the moment
- 14:18with anthropic about to list and all the
- 14:20rest of it and the some of the market
- 14:21pullback we've had. Is this actually a
- 14:24little bit reassuring what's happened
- 14:26with the decoupling?
- 14:28>> Yes, that actually that's an interesting
- 14:30spin on it which I hadn't quite thought
- 14:33about. But you you're right. Um when you
- 14:35got the biggest player of all having a
- 14:38monster selloff and that can't stop the
- 14:41broader market having a really solid
- 14:43strong rebound then that is that is a
- 14:46really good sign of the strength.
- 14:49do I say the durability of the rebound
- 14:53um obviously we'll see I mean the market
- 14:54has been the whole AI trade
- 14:58uh and I would say media
- 15:01driven to a degree the media are so
- 15:05anti- the AI boom it is ridiculous and
- 15:10any any any any negative story it gets
- 15:14ramped and pumped and it's all over the
- 15:16headlines right so obviously this is
- 15:19just another event where they're like,
- 15:20"Oh my god, this is amazing for us." The
- 15:22foder, you know, bang and they're all
- 15:25over Jensen. Um, but the fact that
- 15:27didn't cause another leg lower, I
- 15:31think's a really interesting Yeah.
- 15:33signal about where the market is at with
- 15:35all of this.
- 15:36>> Yeah, I did see an interesting stat. I
- 15:38don't have it here, but I read it
- 15:39earlier today and I think it was like a
- 15:41macro
- 15:43Goldman survey or snaps pulse survey
- 15:46that they did and it was looking at
- 15:48actually any of the holders of the index
- 15:50weren't selling in that move. if it was
- 15:52all the retail punters and so forth uh
- 15:56getting out and it it's exactly to that
- 15:59intro and I kind of had the sensational
- 16:01intro a little bit on purpose
- 16:03>> for me you know working in and around
- 16:05the news for so many well two decades
- 16:08now
- 16:10it's funny it's like the invested
- 16:12interest of the size of capital
- 16:15and the influence behind the scenes
- 16:17involved
- 16:18it's a big thing to fail let's call it
- 16:21whereas is what sells papers and
- 16:24generates clicks. I tell you what does.
- 16:26An espionage scandal, an affair by the
- 16:29number one person who represents the
- 16:32poster boy of AI, an FBI inquiry, an
- 16:36Imperial CEO as they're calling him
- 16:38because there is no chair.
- 16:40>> Yeah.
- 16:40>> Um and he has got no clue. It's just
- 16:42it's almost like a script that's been
- 16:44written for journalists to go to town
- 16:46on.
- 16:47>> It's it's a Netflix script.
- 16:51I refuse to believe any other um reason.
- 16:54But look, as I said, people will forget
- 16:56it. Although, as I've as I have said,
- 16:58the share price is down again sharply
- 17:01today. But as long as he doesn't get
- 17:04arrested,
- 17:06and look, that that could happen. I have
- 17:08got no idea, right? We'll see what the
- 17:09FBI dig up. As long as he doesn't get
- 17:12arrested and he's in big uh obviously
- 17:15legal problems. As long as that doesn't
- 17:18happen, I no doubt this will, you know,
- 17:22be a storm in Jensen's teacup and he
- 17:24will rise above it all. Um, I'm not
- 17:27condoning his actions, by the way.
- 17:28That's just life and the way this is
- 17:30going to work. What will happen for the
- 17:32long-term benefit of Nvidia. This, I'm
- 17:35sure, will trigger um, you know, what's
- 17:38going to go on the board meeting, you
- 17:40know, agenda item number one at the next
- 17:43board will be, well, hang on. This has
- 17:45indicated to us that our keyman risk is
- 17:47way too high. We need to start now a
- 17:50process of reducing that key man risk.
- 17:53So I think this can help Nvidia um over
- 17:58the medium term. But yeah, as long as he
- 18:00get doesn't get arrested, this is this
- 18:03is
- 18:04>> maybe Jensen's hedged himself by
- 18:06becoming very close to Trump at this
- 18:09point. I was just having a quick look
- 18:11and legally according to article 2
- 18:13section two of clause one of the US
- 18:15constitution
- 18:17might I add
- 18:19uh he can be pardoned
- 18:22>> well yeah but can he at any point I
- 18:25think presidents have that thing when
- 18:27they leave office
- 18:29>> they do a whole load of pardons don't
- 18:31they not for two years so can he just do
- 18:34an off-the- cuff pardon at any moment
- 18:37>> well it's I think it doesn't shield him
- 18:40from other investigations,
- 18:43>> state civil lawsuits, removal by his own
- 18:45board, all that sort of stuff. But if
- 18:47the FBI investigation to mega speed
- 18:49allegations,
- 18:51>> uh those export control violations they
- 18:54had cuz you know they were saying they
- 18:55were sneaking in the Nvidia chips, which
- 18:58would be in violation of that.
- 19:00>> Um oral espionage leads to potential
- 19:03federal criminal exposure. Trump can
- 19:06issue a full preemptive pardon.
- 19:08Okay,
- 19:11it's kind of cover. He's hedged himself
- 19:12here. He's a clever guy. Trump Trump's
- 19:15not Trump Trump will turn on a dime. If
- 19:18if if there's any sniff that Jensen has
- 19:21been involved in illegal, you know,
- 19:24facilitating the legal smuggling of
- 19:26Nvidia GPUs to China or if there's any
- 19:29hint he's been involved in any kind of
- 19:31espionage scenario, Trump will I don't
- 19:35he won't he will turn on Jensen in a
- 19:38heartbeat. But if Nvidia fails
- 19:42>> Yeah. And the center, the plug gets
- 19:44pulled from the AI bathtub.
- 19:48>> Yeah.
- 19:48>> History will remember Donald Trump as
- 19:52the worst president that led to
- 19:54catastrophic
- 19:56>> loss. Donald's probably he's probably in
- 19:58his bedroom at the moment just buying up
- 20:00Nvidia stock here before he then
- 20:02announces the uh the pardon.
- 20:05Well, look, let's um let's move on and
- 20:08let's talk about some of the other major
- 20:09headlines here because the other
- 20:10interesting one of course is whilst all
- 20:12of this has been going on anthropic.
- 20:15>> Yeah, not the best timing that one would
- 20:17have hoped for. I mean, it feels like
- 20:20they were probably 6 months too late. If
- 20:23they just got this away,
- 20:25>> maybe just ahead of SpaceX or just right
- 20:27the two weeks after,
- 20:29>> they could have absolutely hit top of
- 20:31market. But it looks like compared to
- 20:36the two trillion whispers actually the
- 20:39stat line is that was 5 weeks ago.
- 20:43>> It was early October.
- 20:44>> Wow. Is that trillion still being about
- 20:48>> right
- 20:49>> now? It's gone down to 1.4 to 1.5
- 20:52trillion and now some are saying uh
- 20:55prospective ro show bidders is sat at
- 20:571.1 to 1.3.
- 21:00So yeah, there was an FT article out
- 21:03earlier today. What was that giving us
- 21:05in terms of some signals of how this
- 21:07might go?
- 21:08>> Well, so they're so the FT dropped it.
- 21:10They're targeting 1.4 trillion is is the
- 21:13latest number. Um
- 21:18obviously, well, they're looking to
- 21:20raise and this has been so this is a bit
- 21:22more interesting info. They're looking
- 21:23to raise now apparently 64 uh billion
- 21:28which can I can I just pause like you
- 21:30got to love Elon not only for the timing
- 21:35of his IPO
- 21:37absolutely
- 21:40just the timing is genius right and will
- 21:43he now hang on to his you know largest
- 21:46ever IPO on record status
- 21:49um and it looks like it he will right in
- 21:52terms of both the valuation because I
- 21:54think correct me if I'm wrong SpaceX was
- 21:551.75 trillion valuation and he raised
- 21:59$85 billion. So here we're now saying
- 22:02anthropic 1.4 trillion valuation raising
- 22:05$64 billion. So Elon will hang on to his
- 22:09uh his records but um so what they're
- 22:13looking to do is plan Anthropic are
- 22:14looking to to to sell 825 million
- 22:18shares. They've issued a price range
- 22:22which actually remember SpaceX didn't
- 22:25SpaceX didn't even have a range. They
- 22:26said this is the price.
- 22:29Take it or leave it. Uh which is very
- 22:31unusual for an IPO but and and actually
- 22:34yeah it' be interesting if if Anthropic
- 22:36did go earlier a month or two back. I'm
- 22:39sure they would have been in the driving
- 22:41seat. They're the ones with the power
- 22:42and maybe they would have gone with a
- 22:44singular price point. but they've lost
- 22:47the initiative and they're on the back
- 22:49foot and the AI trade has absolutely
- 22:52crumpled and so now they're going the
- 22:54range between 70 and $78.
- 22:57So if they do sell the full $825 million
- 23:00at the top of that range which is $78
- 23:02per share that's where you get your 64
- 23:04billion raise from. So just talk to me
- 23:08then strategically
- 23:10why not delay it? Why not let the let
- 23:15the ripples just kind of settle?
- 23:18>> Is it that it could get worse?
- 23:21>> You have to go now. It's going to look
- 23:23bad if you pull out.
- 23:26>> What am I missing there?
- 23:28>> I think it's it could get worse
- 23:32and
- 23:33you know they need the cash. [laughter]
- 23:35You know, in the end they they don't
- 23:38have the luxury to go, "Oh, it's fine.
- 23:39We'll just wait. Let's give it another
- 23:4112 months.
- 23:42That's not how this game works. These
- 23:45data centers, these GPUs, they ain't
- 23:48cheap, right? And their whole model is
- 23:51to build out this infrastructure and and
- 23:53the capital outlay is just ridiculous.
- 23:57So, they don't have the luxury.
- 23:58Although, I mean, what was surprising
- 24:00when they dropped their S1 was that they
- 24:03had I think it was 100 billion on their
- 24:06balance sheet in cash. So, I mean, so
- 24:09they do have some cash. They could delay
- 24:11it, but yeah, I I just think what
- 24:14happens if you delay it and then 6
- 24:16months later we've got a big massive
- 24:19crash and then they're like, "Ah, damn
- 24:23it. Do we delay it again?" You know,
- 24:24ultimately that runway of cash runs out.
- 24:26So,
- 24:28so I think I think they are right to
- 24:31just plow on and take the hit. And look,
- 24:34to be honest, it's not like they're
- 24:35going to be selling much of the business
- 24:37from a percentage perspective. So whilst
- 24:40the valuation 1.4 trillion let's just
- 24:42say it's that whilst that is a lot less
- 24:45than two they don't I mean do they
- 24:47really is the the valuation is not the
- 24:50most important thing for anthropic right
- 24:53it's just not it's just not the most
- 24:56important thing so therefore I think
- 24:59they're right to just crack on even
- 25:01though they're going to be going in at a
- 25:02bit of a discount to what we were
- 25:04thinking a few weeks back. Yeah, there
- 25:05was a strategist at HSBC chap called Max
- 25:09Ker and he was talking about this
- 25:13talking about sub one trillion
- 25:16or a conservative uh pricing structure
- 25:19might be a healthier route to prevent a
- 25:22broken IPO or a SpaceX style dump in the
- 25:25secondary market to avoid
- 25:27>> as to your point. They're thinking about
- 25:30where are we going to be in 2030 and
- 25:32beyond.
- 25:33>> Yeah.
- 25:34>> Momentary, you know, they're still going
- 25:35to raise tens of billions of dollars to
- 25:37fund the build out, the acquisition of
- 25:41the hardware, compose, whatever they
- 25:42need.
- 25:43>> Yeah.
- 25:44>> Like why get obsessive? Elon's won that
- 25:46race now.
- 25:47>> Yeah.
- 25:48>> Quite clearly. But and look like if you
- 25:50take the Elon SpaceX example where they
- 25:53did go at 1.75 trillion which was a kind
- 25:56of crazy valuation their share price in
- 25:59the secondary market since then has been
- 26:01mega volatile like huge huge swings and
- 26:05ultimately right now is trading about
- 26:0815%
- 26:09it's sorry it's underperformed the S&P
- 26:12by 15% since its June IPO day. So, it's
- 26:18massively underperformed and it is being
- 26:20crazy volatile. Um, which is not a not
- 26:25that Elon cares, but you know, for a lot
- 26:28of businesses that would be really
- 26:30difficult to deal with. Um, from a kind
- 26:33of customer or sorry, shareholder
- 26:34relationship perspective, right? Um,
- 26:37Elon doesn't care. But, um, one thing
- 26:40you mentioned there was does it go for
- 26:42below 1 trillion? Now, there would be a
- 26:44really big problem with that.
- 26:47So I was looking back at the valuations
- 26:50of Anthropic through its history, very
- 26:54short history given it kind of was
- 26:57founded in 2021.
- 26:59But we do have certain valuation
- 27:01timestamps and that's each time they've
- 27:03raised capital in the private markets,
- 27:06you know, directly from investors. Were
- 27:08able to have a little mark to market at
- 27:10that point. What was the valuation at
- 27:12that raise? And you go back down the
- 27:14list. I'll come on to my main point in a
- 27:16second. There's some very interesting
- 27:18people.
- 27:18>> I know. I just saw the name by the way.
- 27:20>> You are joking. Yeah. So, they did the
- 27:22series A in May 21. The and the first
- 27:25two raises there, series A and series B.
- 27:28These haven't been entirely
- 27:31uh verified in terms of the valuation.
- 27:33So, the estimate series A in May 21 they
- 27:37raised 124 million at a post money
- 27:39valuation of 550 million. Um,
- 27:44uh, Dustin Moskovich is the most famous
- 27:47person people might have heard of that
- 27:49was involved in that series B, April
- 27:512022, they raised $580 million. Can you
- 27:55believe that? Within the first 12 months
- 27:58of their life as a business, they'd
- 28:00already raised $700 million.
- 28:03Um, anyway, that series B was at a 4
- 28:06billion estimated valuation. So, it gone
- 28:088x valuation in 11 months. Who was all
- 28:12over that series B? It's your man Sam
- 28:15Bankman Freed, baby. There he is. The
- 28:18disgraced FTX founder who's now well got
- 28:24his feet up in jail somewhere. Um, he
- 28:26was all over the C the
- 28:28>> What is he in line for then when this
- 28:30thing goes public?
- 28:32>> Well, 4 billion, right? if he'd if he'd
- 28:34have just made it through,
- 28:38God knows what the valuation of of his
- 28:40holding is now, but anyway, um, series C
- 28:43was May 23. I won't go through all of
- 28:44these. I'm actually series C was
- 28:46interesting because that was another
- 28:48well May 23, so 13 months later, but
- 28:51actually the valuation was flat for that
- 28:5412-month period, April 22 through to May
- 28:5723. Sam Bankmanf freed overpaid in 2022.
- 29:01Um, but then anyway, you you go up the
- 29:04list. By the time we get to March 25,
- 29:06we're at a 61.5 billion valuation.
- 29:10September 25, that was just like what, 6
- 29:15months later, it tripled to 183 billion.
- 29:20Um, 2 months after that, November 2025,
- 29:23it's kind of 2 1/2x up again at 350
- 29:27bill. Feb 26, it's at 380 billion. And
- 29:31then the key point here May 2026 series
- 29:34H round where SEOA were involved it
- 29:38actually went at 965 billion valuation.
- 29:42So there's there's nothing worse than
- 29:44what we call a down round. That's where
- 29:47you raise capital at a lower valuation
- 29:50than a previous raise in the past. So
- 29:53you know they are not going to want a
- 29:55down round here. So it's definitely
- 29:57going to need to be north of the 1
- 29:59trillion. And look, they'll get it away
- 30:00at north of a trillion. You know, if
- 30:02they go for 1.4, people are going to buy
- 30:04it. I know. I know the market has puked
- 30:08here and a lot of corners of the market
- 30:10are panicking, but look, you got your
- 30:12mediumterm
- 30:14hats on and and people are going to
- 30:16hoover this up.
- 30:17>> Two two things there. What I do like is
- 30:19that it was the very partner of Seoia
- 30:22who's saying, "Don't worry about Nvidia.
- 30:25Don't worry about it. Not a bubble."
- 30:28[laughter]
- 30:29the same guy is absolutely
- 30:32deep into invid into anthropic being a
- 30:36success here getting in right on the
- 30:38last round
- 30:40>> uh stumping up some serious change. So
- 30:43[laughter] this ain't no bubbles
- 30:44according to uh to Goya which is quite
- 30:47funny. The other thing is uh you
- 30:49mentioned there about the only real
- 30:51anomaly was the flat uh valuation
- 30:53between April 2022 and May 23. Makes
- 30:56sense because that was when Chachi PT
- 30:58went public
- 31:00>> in November of 2022.
- 31:03>> Yes.
- 31:03>> So probably they raised money I'm
- 31:05assuming 6 months after Chachi PT had
- 31:08gone wildly successful on it initial
- 31:10launch.
- 31:10>> Good point. That's exactly right.
- 31:12>> And that would have been why I would
- 31:13have thought.
- 31:14>> Yeah.
- 31:15>> Um
- 31:15>> absolutely. Um yeah and then like other
- 31:19stuff like Goldman's who are leading
- 31:20this um lead left on this IPO deal. um
- 31:25they've been trying to reassure markets
- 31:28themselves. Obviously for Goldman's,
- 31:30they're fully invested in getting this
- 31:33IPO successfully away. You know, selling
- 31:36all of these 825
- 31:38million newly issued shares, selling all
- 31:41of them at the highest price, you know,
- 31:43within reason that they can. That's 70
- 31:45to 78 price range. By the way, what
- 31:48happens? Um so they're on the road show
- 31:51now, right? So they're out there talking
- 31:52to investors at the moment and that's
- 31:54the price range 70 to 78. What they'll
- 31:57be asked to do the investors by
- 31:59Goldman's they'll be asked then to
- 32:01submit indicative bids you know in
- 32:04principle if you're interested you know
- 32:06how much would you be interested how
- 32:08many of the 825 million shares would you
- 32:11be interested in buying and at what
- 32:13price. This is then a book building
- 32:15process which enables the investment
- 32:17bank to gauge demand and therefore with
- 32:20that demand data then set a singular IPO
- 32:24price um normally between the range 70
- 32:29to 78. That that's not fixed though. It
- 32:32it could it could end up going above the
- 32:34range or below the range depending on
- 32:36how that demand gauge looks like in that
- 32:39book building process. Right? But
- 32:41Goldman's will want to be getting this
- 32:43away at the top of the range, right? So
- 32:44obviously they're talking their own
- 32:46book. So they're saying ah offropic
- 32:48they're expecting to make $600 billion
- 32:50worth of revenue by annual revenue by
- 32:532030 and that's up more than 130 times
- 32:57from its sales and revenue last year. So
- 33:00they're pumping, you know, really
- 33:02bullish uh projections here on revenue
- 33:05growth.
- 33:05>> Yeah. And in combination with that, the
- 33:07yeah, the spin doctors are working hard
- 33:09on their stage crafting, dropping the I
- 33:13saw the the Mythos and Fable models the
- 33:16day before the road show begins. It's
- 33:19like, oh, by the way, we've just
- 33:20upgraded these uh humanity destroying
- 33:24models even more because destroying
- 33:28planet Earth wasn't enough. We're now
- 33:30going bigger. So, by the way, we do have
- 33:33this uh even though uh there's going to
- 33:35be lots of things around it that we
- 33:37won't have details on, but I guess
- 33:39that's to serve your point. Uh the sales
- 33:42desks, the syndicate bankers, it's this
- 33:45kind of fresh product momentum defense
- 33:48of the uh the valuation multiple against
- 33:52some of these other concerns of tech
- 33:55multiple fatigue and so forth. So, yeah,
- 33:57they are going guns blazing. This is
- 33:59what you pay Goldman's for though,
- 34:00right?
- 34:01>> That's right. But but unfortunately at
- 34:04the end of the day, there are things
- 34:05that are under your control and then
- 34:08there are things that are not. And what
- 34:10is under their control? Well, we can
- 34:12pump out bullish revenue growth
- 34:14expectations. We can, you know, set the
- 34:17price range and like let's have an
- 34:18amazing, you know, investor road show
- 34:21and they can everything in their control
- 34:23obviously they're experts at. What they
- 34:26can't control is the macro market
- 34:28sentiment. What they can't control is
- 34:32Jensen, you know, sleeping with a spy.
- 34:35You know, they can't control those
- 34:36things. And unfortunately, from a timing
- 34:38perspective, it's shocking,
- 34:41but
- 34:42I don't think they have a choice. I
- 34:44think, well, as we know, they are
- 34:46cracking on with the IPO, and I think
- 34:47that is the right call. And maybe as a
- 34:49segue then to conclude the other thing
- 34:52they can't control
- 34:54even though it's a little bit circular
- 34:55in financing and so on and so forth but
- 34:58they can't control competitors and the
- 35:01only competitors in town that can really
- 35:05change move the needle at all are the
- 35:08hyperscalers.
- 35:10>> Yeah. And one of those that I saw that's
- 35:13also come out in the last day or two was
- 35:15Alphabet talking about custom silicon
- 35:18variants, these TPUs. And I know you've
- 35:21talked about TPUs a number of times on
- 35:24the show over probably the last 24
- 35:27months.
- 35:28>> Yeah.
- 35:28>> Talk to me about that. What What is
- 35:30Google's uh product here that they're
- 35:33offering? This is Google is amazing cuz
- 35:36they've got so many little
- 35:39sort of diamonds that they're sat on and
- 35:43I think they just don't it doesn't
- 35:45really get much coverage.
- 35:47Um whether or not you can argue it's not
- 35:50priced into their share price. I'm not
- 35:53I'm not too sure I I would go quite
- 35:56there, but um they've got these things.
- 35:59That's what you remember that Nvidia
- 36:01their chips are called GPUs, right?
- 36:03Well, Google have something called TPUs,
- 36:07which is slightly different but
- 36:08equivalent. Okay, so they they are a
- 36:12straight up competitor to Nvidia at the
- 36:14chip level. Um, we are in a world where
- 36:18Nvidia GPUs are sold out. They're sold
- 36:21out for till like 2029, right? So,
- 36:25Alphabet are sat on this very
- 36:27interesting product. Now, who's going to
- 36:30get first dibs on Alphabet's TPUs?
- 36:33Google obviously. So, this does does
- 36:37give them an incredible sort of moat.
- 36:40And I've spoken in the past about
- 36:42Google's, you know, complete uh they
- 36:44they've got the full vertical stack,
- 36:46right? in that they've got the chips,
- 36:49they're building data centers, um they
- 36:52have the cloud, um which is growing gang
- 36:56busters, and then they've got the
- 36:57frontier models as well in Gemini,
- 36:59right? They they're the only ones at the
- 37:00moment that are occupying all layers of
- 37:03the stack. Now, that'll change cuz all
- 37:06the other big hyperscalers are busy
- 37:09building products in all layers of the
- 37:10stack, right? And who knows, in like 10
- 37:12years time, you're probably just going
- 37:14to have four or five companies that just
- 37:17do everything. Like Nvidia, they're
- 37:19going the other way, right? Yes, they've
- 37:20got the chips, but they're building
- 37:22buying hugging face and, you know,
- 37:24building models themselves now, right?
- 37:26But but anyway, obviously, you know, for
- 37:30every um for every player in the game
- 37:35that stumbles, there's a competitor that
- 37:38benefits. And so whilst Nvidia and
- 37:42Jensen, you know, do their thing, well,
- 37:44Alphabet are nicely placed of course
- 37:46from a TPU perspective. They've just
- 37:48launched a couple of new products on
- 37:49that front. TPU8TX,
- 37:52that's for like confidential computing.
- 37:54Um, they paired that up with AMD's CPUs.
- 37:57And then you got something called TPU 8i
- 38:00max uh which is a dual chip module
- 38:03optimized for long context inference uh
- 38:07things like maths and code generation
- 38:09and stuff like that. Right. So um
- 38:12Bloomberg intelligence projects external
- 38:15TPU hardware software revenues are
- 38:18basically Bloomberg are saying that that
- 38:20they're going to cross the $135 billion
- 38:23mark by 2028. So that's Google selling
- 38:25chips. Um, you've got companies like
- 38:29Jump Trading, um, which I'm sure many of
- 38:32our listeners will be familiar with,
- 38:34client of ours. Shout out to Jump. Um,
- 38:37but they've disclosed deploying
- 38:38thousands of these TPUs. And actually,
- 38:41Jump is saying that they're about 30%
- 38:44lower cost versus Nvidia. So, Google
- 38:47have been placing themselves in the
- 38:48market at a cheaper price point. But
- 38:50look, whilst all that sounds good and
- 38:52wow, Google are going to come in and
- 38:54soak up all the market share, there's no
- 38:57market share. It's all sold out. You
- 39:00know what I mean? So, in the in the
- 39:03short to medium term, none of this
- 39:06matters for Nvidia in terms of them
- 39:09selling GPUs unless Jensen gets
- 39:13arrested.
- 39:15Otherwise, fine, Google will crack on.
- 39:18Um, but are they going to properly
- 39:19benefit from this Nvidia wobble?
- 39:23I I don't think you can necessarily
- 39:25connect those two dots. Yeah, I think
- 39:27the
- 39:29looking at politics as a precedence.
- 39:33It's the the it's the big thing until
- 39:36the next big thing comes along and
- 39:38Jensen is the big thing of this week.
- 39:40And just like politicians always do and
- 39:43I think co the postco environment which
- 39:45is very lumpy for many politicians
- 39:48around the globe.
- 39:49>> I think the strategy that yielded
- 39:50probably the best results was just just
- 39:52to stick it out
- 39:55and in time the next concern arises and
- 39:59the previous one is forgotten. And one
- 40:00of the things I was trying to sort of
- 40:02put together is in my head there's
- 40:04always this analogy I have of cops and
- 40:06robbers
- 40:08and the problem that you have when it
- 40:09comes to say in this case what I would
- 40:11say is like you know these frontier labs
- 40:14are like the robbers in the sense of
- 40:16their ability to move at the speed that
- 40:18they can
- 40:20>> and to be at the cutting edge of
- 40:22technology and change
- 40:24>> and adaptation
- 40:26>> to make you know to take advantage of
- 40:28opportunity Whereas regulation moves at
- 40:32the speed of congressional committees,
- 40:34>> right?
- 40:35>> Which is at a snail's pace at best, of
- 40:39which most of it never comes to fruition
- 40:41anyway
- 40:42>> because of the composition changes just
- 40:45like we've had in the midterms where
- 40:47things just get stopped, started,
- 40:49changed, reinvented, and by the time
- 40:51it's come,
- 40:54the robbers are already, you know, round
- 40:55the c round down in the next town. Yeah,
- 40:58[laughter]
- 40:58absolutely. And and anyway, thank God
- 41:02Jens is thinking well, thank God
- 41:04Goldman's are still advising Anthropic
- 41:06to go ahead with their IPO because
- 41:08that'll be the next big story in a
- 41:09couple of weeks time. That is very very
- 41:12true, actually.
- 41:14>> Yeah.
- 41:14>> And then how long have we got to go? I
- 41:16mean, it's thanks just before
- 41:17Thanksgiving, isn't it? So,
- 41:19>> yeah,
- 41:19>> he's just got he's got to hunker down.
- 41:22>> Yeah. Less than two weeks.
- 41:23>> See it out. And look,
- 41:24>> just get get through. By no way am I
- 41:26saying what Jensen did was right.
- 41:29>> Yeah.
- 41:30>> Uh his actual uh thing that he did. By
- 41:35no means am I condoning. But my point
- 41:36being that yeah, let's just see how this
- 41:38plays out and washes out. Is he indeed
- 41:41too big to be fired. Let us know what
- 41:42you think. Drop us a comment. Uh both
- 41:46that and also uh Ronaldo or Messi who is
- 41:50the uh greatest of all time. Let us know
- 41:52in the comments. Uh but cool. Thank you
- 41:54very much, Pier.
- 41:56>> See you next week.
- 41:57>> Pleasure. See you later.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Nvidia's Jensen Huang Scandal & Anthropic's IPO Deflates to $1.4 Trillion by Market Maker Podcast, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 6,706 words across 1,020 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.