NSDC training_2nd gov_Albrain — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:01Three things I will talk in my speech.
- 0:02Number one is on the rebuttal why
- 0:04opposition civilizations was wrong.
- 0:06Secondly, on the rebuttal why opposition
- 0:08establishment of better law was wrong.
- 0:10But thirdly, on the extension on how
- 0:11individual can lead to more balance and
- 0:13peaceful environmental condition on our
- 0:15side of the house. But firstly, on the
- 0:16rebuttal on the civilization side. I
- 0:18think what they aim to be civilization
- 0:20is something that is principally wrong
- 0:22because what we have to understand the
- 0:24background historically, civilization
- 0:26happened through lots of tragedies that
- 0:27exist. After post neolithic
- 0:30during post neolithic revolution even
- 0:32until right now, billions of war exist
- 0:35everywhere and we have seen tragic death
- 0:37of trillions of people who's not
- 0:39supposed to die but should suffer just
- 0:41because of the one people command. Why
- 0:43this is problematic? A, they have to
- 0:45actually only explanation that come from
- 0:47their side about how community shape
- 0:49because people opposition framing is
- 0:50only about because they need protection.
- 0:52We think this war exactly exists because
- 0:53on the sharing of the different
- 0:55interest. When you have fun, others
- 0:57don't share the same interest, you hate
- 0:59them and hate to accept different
- 1:00opinions on them and the only resolution
- 1:02to finish it is to start conflict
- 1:04because discussion musyawarah mufakat
- 1:06does not exactly work and this is likely
- 1:08since human with each of their ego to
- 1:10want to maintain their communal
- 1:11interest, want to show their pride when
- 1:13the other one lose on the debate or lose
- 1:15life when their interest is exactly
- 1:17folded. But B, I think there is lack of
- 1:19definition of what is morally right and
- 1:21what is morally wrong even until after
- 1:23post neolithic revolution because there
- 1:25will always be a problematic actor who's
- 1:27not standing on peace but standing on
- 1:29the evil side which is authoritarianism.
- 1:31They brought development but by lots of
- 1:33sacrificing of accusing people aligned
- 1:35with different ideologies and
- 1:37importantly when they have seen a
- 1:38different skin race and ethnicities,
- 1:40they will attempt to eliminate as what
- 1:42exactly happened to Hutu and Tutsi
- 1:43conflict when there is lots of
- 1:45sacrificing of Tutsis who don't even
- 1:46have a weapon. This is what human don't
- 1:48want like because they actually put a
- 1:50life on sacrificing other people. Humans
- 1:52don't want the ultimate value of this
- 1:54actor when they only saw their families
- 1:55got beaten. When there is lots of
- 1:57campaign saying world peace, but there
- 1:59is less a resolution. Therefore, the
- 2:01trade-off is even if opposition said
- 2:03they will achieve civilization when
- 2:04human become much more established, they
- 2:06achieve it by sacrilegation. But
- 2:07moreover, they failed to maintain even
- 2:10if peace can happen, they failed to
- 2:11maintain the peace right now. Because
- 2:13look, it is still untouched. Status quo,
- 2:15United Nations, lots of sanction already
- 2:17exist, but still lots of terrorists
- 2:19exist out there to terrorize people.
- 2:21Superpower nations like Russia continues
- 2:23to invade Ukraine in comparison to our
- 2:25side. Human before this era don't
- 2:27understand what war is, what better
- 2:29interest life is. What they do is
- 2:30following their natural instinct and
- 2:32communal interest to maintain their
- 2:33species to not exist. They understand
- 2:36more about the fulfillment of life, that
- 2:38is survival and protecting each other,
- 2:40serving your children to how to survive
- 2:42and grow based on their life. When the
- 2:43right now, the violations is much more
- 2:46um radical and pragmatic. The second you
- 2:48on the idea that how opposition says
- 2:50after post this era, they will have
- 2:51better society because of this
- 2:53establishment of law. I think there is a
- 2:54certain problem to begin with. Number
- 2:56one, is that law is actually principally
- 2:58written and that is actually very
- 2:59perfect, but the execution executions of
- 3:02law is so much imperfect. There is
- 3:04tendency of people to violate the law
- 3:06just because they want to satisfy their
- 3:08interest. For example, because they felt
- 3:09it is actually going to benefited them
- 3:11when they corrupt and they can fight the
- 3:12entire family of it even if they
- 3:14sacrifices the
- 3:16fund to actually being allocated to the
- 3:18disaster victim. This is something that
- 3:20is very justified, right? Because there
- 3:21is also gap to actually understand this
- 3:23type of thing. But B, tragically, law is
- 3:26actually very unfair, right? Because it
- 3:27depends on the nation who you live in,
- 3:29the community who you live in. You
- 3:31cannot generalize that law to serving
- 3:32human is actually acceptable in every
- 3:34type of the world because there is
- 3:36prerequisite. For example, in Iran right
- 3:38now, they can simply kill you just
- 3:39because you are a supporting family's
- 3:41movement or in Afghanistan, you can be
- 3:43you can be killed just because you are
- 3:44as you are a woman and you try to seek
- 3:47for a better education. Law is something
- 3:49that is very unstable, especially there
- 3:51is different characterization of it. In
- 3:53comparison, when human don't understand
- 3:55to even establish before it, they don't
- 3:57have capacity to understand which gap of
- 3:59law to actually we can simply violate
- 4:01right now. Because human right now, even
- 4:03if they can settle out, they can use law
- 4:04to actually manipulate other thing,
- 4:06which is to hide their morally bad
- 4:08action. They only know which is right
- 4:10and wrong. People within Neolithic
- 4:12revolution does not know it, right? They
- 4:13actually just know how to live when they
- 4:15are surviving. For example, even if
- 4:17there is rule before, like man and
- 4:18woman, they just going to actually men
- 4:20going to um hunting, and woman can
- 4:23simply like growing the child with love.
- 4:25That is something that is principally
- 4:26just exist in Neolithic revolution. But
- 4:29moving on to the extension on how
- 4:30individual can adapt to more balanced
- 4:31and peaceful environmental condition.
- 4:33What does human run right now? They are
- 4:35contributing directly to climate change.
- 4:37They run such a massive
- 4:38commercialization of industries, and
- 4:40therefore destroy the harmony within it.
- 4:42The problem is when they try to build
- 4:44those thing, they want to exploit the
- 4:45environment just to ensure that they
- 4:46will maximize this lots of incentive and
- 4:48benefit and money. But it is
- 4:50problematic, because they improve this
- 4:52by making environmentally damage. They
- 4:54left other creatures should move their
- 4:56home and basic place this creatures
- 4:57should get actually only available to
- 4:59this creatures. They killed other
- 5:01creatures just because they felt like
- 5:03this is actually they are the special
- 5:04creatures, they are the image of God
- 5:06itself. But secondly, even if right now
- 5:08human are also attempt to stop those
- 5:10thing. Exactly, we have Kyoto Protocol,
- 5:12Paris Agreement to show that they can
- 5:14run out from this problem by agreement.
- 5:15But agreement cannot exactly work,
- 5:17because there is still the one who is
- 5:19evil and dangerous out there. There is
- 5:21violations of rules, the conscription of
- 5:23each nation to actually sign this.
- 5:25Humans are actually very inconsistent
- 5:27within this rule. Government never
- 5:28realize Opposition never realizes that
- 5:30human are inconsistencies when they
- 5:32actually felt like
- 5:33it is benefited for them that they can
- 5:35actually follow the rules. But if it is
- 5:37not benefited, they can actually violate
- 5:38the rule even if it actually sac- means
- 5:40by sacrificing other people's life. But
- 5:42thirdly, it is likely to happen, since
- 5:44human is the solely and the only one who
- 5:46is smart right now within this planet
- 5:47right now with this massive
- 5:49civilization. They are the only one
- 5:50who's smart to operate all these
- 5:51incentive and there are imbalances of
- 5:53power between any living creatures who
- 5:55live in this world. Understand right now
- 5:57that in comparison the pre-neolithic
- 5:59lives with all creators living within
- 6:01their own communities just based on
- 6:02themselves and based on what the
- 6:03classification of what their genes looks
- 6:05like, they are only all humans and even
- 6:08animal was classified as an animal. They
- 6:10live in a perfect symbiosis with the
- 6:12other one and live with the
- 6:13survivability from not exploiting the
- 6:15environment. They only kill one bear,
- 6:18only kill one bear to feed the entire
- 6:19families in comparison to what
- 6:21government exactly frame to do is that
- 6:23they built a massive agricultural and
- 6:25farming land and produce massive stock
- 6:27life just to being killed and eat and
- 6:29they repeat the same cycles again and
- 6:30again. Why this is actually better in
- 6:32our side of the house? Number one is
- 6:33that they don't exploiting the
- 6:35environment overly, over use these types
- 6:37of thing because they live on their hunt
- 6:39and equal with what they should consume
- 6:41because what they
- 6:43uh get on the hunt exactly what is that
- 6:45they can actually
- 6:47get. That being said, they understand
- 6:48the meaningful of the life more because
- 6:50they respect how they nature work
- 6:52because you know to restore the entire
- 6:54environment there need a time of period
- 6:56when human can actually live. In
- 6:57comparison to right now when they want
- 6:58to restore, the damage is already there
- 7:00because there is a massive corruption of
- 7:02the environment right now. But secondly,
- 7:04on the principle of utilitarianism, even
- 7:06if there is threat of predators like
- 7:07lion, they protect each other from those
- 7:09attack. There is morally justified
- 7:11because that is the real law. After
- 7:12neolithic revolution, one, human lives
- 7:15with their communities but it is divided
- 7:16to
- 7:17until right now with different ideas and
- 7:19different belief. They hurt each other
- 7:21through war and don't even care even if
- 7:22they kill human, they have justification
- 7:24of it just because they said that this
- 7:25human was actually very unfair to me.
- 7:27They kill people, they take the lives of
- 7:29the people that actually uh become the
- 7:31contributor for the entire family. But
- 7:32B, even if human develop better system
- 7:34as what they characterize in law to
- 7:36comparison, we have law of jungle system
- 7:38hukum rimba. The problem is on how they
- 7:40get the sanction because the
- 7:41implementation was broken. They punish
- 7:44people without a bargaining power, but
- 7:45they give generosity to people in power
- 7:48even if these people are wrong morally.
- 7:50This is important because without these
- 7:52presents, human was folder in tears just
- 7:54to see that they have been treated
- 7:56unfairly by the by this broken system
- 7:58and they can see that all the
- 8:00environment was better on them. The
- 8:01trade off is one based on the law. We
- 8:03have proven why the establishment of law
- 8:05is better on our side. Secondly, on the
- 8:07civilization, we have proven that why
- 8:08opposition civilization was achieved
- 8:10through a better thing. But thirdly, on
- 8:12comparison, we think we already proven
- 8:13the counterfactual why then life
- 8:16pre-neolithic was already good. For that
- 8:18reason, we declare we win this debate.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of NSDC training_2nd gov_Albrain by KDF East Nusa Tenggara, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,760 words across 275 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.