YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → New Evidence Completely Upends Cornell 7 Case | Ep. 1873

New Evidence Completely Upends Cornell 7 Case | Ep. 1873 — Transcript

by Matt Walsh · 8,847 words · 1,549 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00There is new evidence in the form of
0:01text messages suggesting that the
0:03Cornell seven, the male Cornell students
0:06who were accused of heinous crimes in a
0:08now infamous lawsuit,
0:10two years after the fact and had their
0:11lives destroyed in the process,
0:13were the victims of a false narrative,
0:15uh, a hoax that originated with the
0:17accusers' sorority sisters who were
0:19desperate to protect the reputation of
0:21their sorority.
0:23And we're going to talk about the
0:24evidence in a moment and
0:25what it means for the case and and for
0:27the rule of law in this country. But
0:29first,
0:30on the subject of how the system is
0:32stacked against male defendants in cases
0:34like this,
0:35there was a moment during Russell
0:36Brand's sentencing, uh, earlier this
0:39week that we didn't talk about
0:40when we discussed the case,
0:42which really should be getting a lot
0:44more attention. It's the perfect
0:45illustration of how the legal system,
0:47both in the UK and the US,
0:50has become a total farce where kangaroo
0:52courts are operating
0:54right out in the open,
0:55particularly when when they want to send
0:57a conservative to prison, they will
0:59simply forget about basic principles of
1:02due process and fairness. And instead,
1:05they'll berate you
1:07for even attempting to defend yourself
1:09against their onslaught of allegations.
1:12So this is just this is footage of the
1:14judge Justice Benathan
1:17with his, uh, his, uh, nice little wig
1:20and everything right before he sentenced
1:21Russell Brand.
1:23And listen to what this guy says.
1:27>> Finally, before passing sentence,
1:30I pause to pay tribute to the
1:31determination and bravery of all the
1:34women whose evidence I have been
1:37recounting.
1:38I do not increase your punishment
1:41because of it,
1:43but all those women had to face being
1:45confronted and being told they'd lied or
1:48twisted the truth
1:49and or they'd agreed to your sexual
1:52demands.
1:53That was all done because of you
1:55on your instructions.
1:58I also commend the Metropolitan Police
2:01for their hard work in gathering
2:02evidence and taking great care of all
2:05the women who testified.
2:10>> And I I actually appreciate there's a
2:12charm in the fact that they still do the
2:13wig and the robes and all that kind of
2:15stuff.
2:16Uh or I would appreciate it more, but
2:18then at the same time these are all woke
2:20lunatics.
2:22So you're woke lunatics, but you're
2:23hanging on to the wig and it just
2:25doesn't it doesn't choose one of the
2:27other.
2:28Um now I don't think I've ever heard of
2:29a judge lecturing a defendant for
2:32presenting a defense, but that's exactly
2:34what just happened here. He's attacking
2:35Russell Brand for telling his lawyers to
2:37cross-examine
2:39the women who were accusing him of
2:41serious horrific crimes.
2:44We're supposed to feel bad that these
2:45women had to answer questions on the
2:47witness stand
2:49where their credibility was called into
2:50question
2:51as if they're somehow being
2:52re-victimized again or whatever.
2:55So in other words, he's telling Russell
2:56Brand
2:57that he, Russell Brand, should have just
2:59pled guilty.
3:01How dare he point out that there's zero
3:03evidence whatsoever aside from these
3:05women's claims to corroborate any of the
3:07charges. How dare he point out that
3:09these alleged crimes all occurred nearly
3:11two decades ago
3:13and none of these women told the police
3:14at the time. How dare he point out that
3:16the supposedly incriminating text
3:17messages sent by Russell Brand, which
3:19were introduced into evidence, were
3:20simply recounted from memory by his
3:22accuser because the phone company lost
3:24the text messages since it all happened
3:26so long ago.
3:27How dare his lawyers observe that the
3:29main accuser consented to degenerate
3:31sexual activity with Brand on multiple
3:33occasions 17 years ago and therefore we
3:36really have no idea
3:37or no way of knowing whether she's
3:39telling the truth about one specific sex
3:41act that occurred as part of a larger
3:43sexual encounter that she did consent
3:46to.
3:47He should have just accepted his fate
3:49the moment the British government
3:50decided to destroy him for
3:52becoming a conservative.
3:54That's what the judge is saying.
3:56Now keep in mind the jury acquitted
3:57Russell Brand on several of the charges
3:59that were brought against him, so the
4:00cross-examinations
4:02were obviously in part successful.
4:05What happened is that the jury dismissed
4:06the charges where the women's story
4:08changed
4:09or where where the you know she didn't
4:10report it at the time or where the
4:12details were hazy but they convicted
4:14Brand on the charges where the women
4:16mostly kept their story straight or told
4:18other people at the time about what had
4:20supposedly happened.
4:22So basically in every case the
4:23convictions were based solely on the
4:25women's testimony.
4:26Just a question of whether the woman
4:28repeated her claim to other people and
4:30kept it consistent or not.
4:32But if the judge had his way Brand would
4:34have simply pleaded guilty to all the
4:36charges
4:37and accepted a much longer sentence.
4:40The judge thinks that would be
4:41appropriate to spare these brave women
4:43who he he wants to pay tribute to.
4:46Now perhaps he wanted Brand to present
4:48evidence of his own guilt
4:50do the prosecutions work for them and
4:52then plead for a longer sentence.
4:56That was apparently the expectation.
4:59At least the judge claims he didn't
5:00increase Brand's sentence because he
5:01exercised his right to defend himself.
5:04So that's something.
5:05Begrudgingly he won't tack on five years
5:08to the sentence because the concept of
5:10cross-examination exists.
5:12What a magnanimous gesture.
5:15Now of course if cross-examination was
5:16not a factor in sentencing then there's
5:19no reason for the judge to mention it at
5:20all. The mere fact he said this as we
5:22all know is a pretty clear indication
5:23that he harbors resentment for Russell
5:25Brand for daring to defend himself.
5:28And there's no way he didn't sentence
5:29him to a longer sentence because of it.
5:32After all as we established earlier this
5:33week Brand got a much harsher sentence
5:36than murderers and child predators.
5:38You can kill somebody in Britain and get
5:40five years in prison.
5:42The judge will make excuses for you
5:43saying you momentarily lost control
5:46especially if you're a Muslim or a woman
5:47or identify as trans.
5:49Meanwhile Russell Brand got 10 years
5:52plus a lecture from the judge about how
5:54he's a horrible person for even
5:55attempting to defend himself.
5:58So the foundational legal principle that
6:00a defendant is allowed to defend himself
6:02it's right there in the name actually.
6:04Defendant
6:06was held against Russell Brand.
6:09And the other foundational legal
6:10principle of beyond a reasonable doubt
6:13was suspended entirely in order to get
6:15Russell Brand into a prison cell.
6:17As we discussed earlier, you know,
6:20you may believe that he's guilty because
6:23in your mind he, you know, seems like
6:25the kind of guy who would do something
6:28like what he's accused of doing. You may
6:30subjectively determine that in in the
6:32game of he said, she said,
6:34you tend to believe the she instead of
6:36the he.
6:38That's your opinion.
6:39I don't agree with it, but you can have
6:41whatever opinion you want.
6:43But in no universe,
6:45at least not in this one, and especially
6:47not in the West where we're supposed to
6:48have a fair and sophisticated judicial
6:50system,
6:52can it be claimed that this subjective
6:54opinion about the credibility of the
6:56accusers and the presumed moral failings
6:58of the defendant
7:00amounts to guilt beyond a reasonable
7:03doubt.
7:04You may think Russell Brand is guilty,
7:06but there are a number of extremely
7:08plausible scenarios that explain away
7:12all of the evidence against him,
7:14what meager evidence there ever was.
7:16And the prosecution did not disprove any
7:19of those scenarios.
7:20And yes, all the defense needs to do
7:23in theory is establish that there are
7:25plausible scenarios where the defendant
7:28is not guilty.
7:30And it's up to the prosecution to
7:31actively demonstrate that no such
7:34scenario exists.
7:36They didn't.
7:38You know, if the defense can go can say,
7:40well, you claim I did this, but I also
7:42could have just did this could have
7:43happened over here. Here's another thing
7:45that also fits the evidence. Can you
7:46dispute And if the prosecution says,
7:48well, yeah, that could have happened
7:49too, who knows,
7:51then it's not guilty. It has to be not
7:53guilty.
7:55And the plausible scenario in all these
7:56accusations is that it was consensual in
7:58the moment, that the woman regretted it
8:00later, changed her mind, and decided
8:02that she was going to destroy Russell
8:03Brand. That is the very plausible, very
8:06possible scenario that exists in all of
8:09these cases, and the prosecution did
8:11absolutely nothing
8:13to disprove uh disprove that. They
8:16didn't come within a mile of beyond a
8:17reasonable doubt, in other words.
8:20So the standard was simply dis
8:21disregarded in his case. And if it can
8:23be disregarded in his case,
8:25it can be disregarded in your case.
8:29Whether you live in the US or the UK, a
8:30precedent has been set.
8:33And for good measure, his online
8:34presence is also being erased by the big
8:36tech platforms, Meta, the uh company
8:38that owns Facebook and Instagram,
8:40has already unpersoned Russell Brand. Uh
8:43they've deleted his Instagram account
8:45and prevented anyone from seeing his
8:47profile
8:48like he never existed,
8:50which as far as I know is not standard
8:53procedure if somebody gets convicted of
8:54a crime.
8:55Is this what it does does Meta do this
8:58for anybody? If you get convicted of a
9:00crime, they just take your account down?
9:04I'm pretty sure if I checked, I could
9:05find like a million examples where they
9:08didn't do that.
9:10But especially as the left regains
9:11power, this is going to become much more
9:13common. The censorship of 2020 is going
9:16to pale in comparison to what they're
9:17doing right now.
9:19So this is a travesty of justice.
9:20Really, it was a political hit job. It's
9:22it's emblematic
9:24of the justice that you will receive in
9:26any western country if you're accused of
9:28a serious crime and you don't belong to
9:30one of the left's preferred demographic
9:32groups.
9:33Your guilt is assumed from the outset.
9:36Any attempt to defend yourself is seen
9:38as further evidence of your guilt.
9:42And even as you uncover evidence that
9:44disproves the allegations against you,
9:46even as you conclusively demonstrate
9:47that you're innocent,
9:50which again is not the standard for
9:51defendants, you don't have to
9:52conclusively demonstrate that you're
9:53innocent, but even if you do that,
9:56these people will not yield.
9:58They're not going to admit they made a
9:59mistake.
10:01Instead, they'll double down in their
10:02efforts to destroy you and if possible,
10:04they'll use the opportunity to enact
10:05systemic change to empower themselves
10:07and disenfranchise their enemies. That's
10:10exactly what's happening in the ongoing
10:11saga of the Cornell seven, which has
10:14gone even further off the rails
10:17since we last talked about the case. As
10:18you may recall, an adult woman
10:20voluntarily engaged in group sexual
10:22activity
10:23a Cornell frat house where everybody was
10:25under the influence of drugs and
10:27alcohol. Everybody was was behaving in a
10:29disgusting, barbaric manner.
10:31Uh after the fact, she repeatedly states
10:34in writing that nothing illegal
10:36happened,
10:37that she felt empowered by the whole
10:39experience.
10:40Then she gets disinvited from the
10:42fraternity's Halloween party,
10:44which to a sorority girl is the ultimate
10:46offense,
10:48you know, because a Halloween party
10:49Halloween is like Christmas, New Year's,
10:51uh your birthday all rolled into one.
10:54And so she decided that she was actually
10:56a victim. She starts sending texts that
10:58are designed to entrap the men. She goes
11:00to the police who quickly determine that
11:02even if all of her allegations were
11:03true, still no crime had occurred. And
11:05then two years later, she gets a strip
11:07mall lawyer to file a bombshell lawsuit
11:10complete with complete with tons of
11:12lurid and totally unverified claims
11:14where she changes her version of events
11:15once again, this time to directly accuse
11:18the men of serious criminal conduct,
11:20which she had never done before.
11:22So that's the outline of the story. None
11:24of those facts are in dispute.
11:26The appropriate response given this
11:28evidence,
11:29before we even get into the new stuff,
11:31is to simply ignore this woman because
11:33she has no credibility whatsoever.
11:34Actually, the best response,
11:36even based on what we already know,
11:38would be to charge her with a crime for
11:40making false accusations
11:42and then after she's convicted, put her
11:44in prison.
11:46Yeah, but that's never going to happen
11:47because in the modern justice system,
11:48there's essentially no penalty, no
11:50disincentive at all for falsely accusing
11:52men of sexual assault. The only thing
11:54stopping a woman
11:56from accusing a man of sexual assault
11:58falsely is her own soul.
12:01But if she doesn't have one, then all
12:03bets are off.
12:04So instead, Cornell has descended into a
12:06level of hysteria that rivals the Salem
12:09witch trials, except in reverse now
12:10because this time the witches are doing
12:12the burning.
12:13Now they're citing a bogus survey about
12:15how a third of women at Cornell have
12:17supposedly quote experienced
12:19non-consensual sexual contact involving
12:22force or incapacitation.
12:25So if that's true, it would make Cornell
12:27University substantially more dangerous
12:29for women than Afghanistan or a Somali
12:33refugee camp.
12:34It would mean that a a quiet Ivy League
12:37campus is actually more dangerous
12:40than the worst third-world hellhole you
12:42can find anywhere on earth.
12:45And if the women at Cornell actually
12:46believed that was true,
12:49they would all withdraw from the school
12:50immediately.
12:52What are you doing paying exorbitant
12:54fees to spend four years in a rape
12:56dungeon?
12:58Why would you ever do that?
13:01But they haven't
13:02withdrawn. In fact, in spite of the fact
13:05that Cornell is more dangerous than a
13:07country run by the Taliban, not only are
13:09women not withdrawing from the school,
13:11they're still getting hammered and going
13:12out to parties,
13:15which is probably not something a woman
13:16would do or even a man would do in
13:18Taliban-controlled territory.
13:22Okay? If you really believe there's a
13:24there's a 30% chance that you could be
13:26sexually assaulted,
13:28or whatever they're saying the statistic
13:29is,
13:31not only are you not leaving the campus,
13:33you're going to parties.
13:35That is a clear indication you don't
13:37believe that.
13:39And no one else does because it's
13:41nonsense.
13:43And it's not true. You know, the survey
13:44conveniently enough has an extremely low
13:46response rate of just 13% along with a
13:48very expansive definition of assault,
13:50which is entirely self-reported. None of
13:52the accusations are verified in any way.
13:55So our society has gone to great lengths
13:57to convince women that they've been
13:58assaulted,
14:00and then researchers come along and ask
14:02them
14:03if they've been assaulted,
14:05and then a lot of them say yes, and
14:06we're supposed to go, wow.
14:08Wow.
14:09How could that have happened?
14:11So it's completely fake and useless as a
14:13statistic. Nevertheless, based in part
14:15on that survey, the Cornell faculty just
14:18voted overwhelmingly to pass the
14:20following resolution. Quote, resolved
14:23that the faculty senate has no
14:24confidence in the ability of the central
14:26administration to effectively address
14:27the ongoing crisis of sexual assault at
14:29Cornell University.
14:31Yes, the ongoing crisis of sexual
14:33assault at Cornell University is so bad
14:36they want the school's entire
14:37administration to be fired.
14:39So here's how one Cornell professor, a
14:41woman who teaches music,
14:43um described the vote. Watch.
14:47>> The majority of the professors said they
14:49do not trust the leadership of President
14:52for the administration. What
14:54does that mean?
14:55>> Yeah, it feels great actually. It feels
14:58like we have sent a really resounding
15:01message, as you say, from the majority
15:04of the faculty that are demanding change
15:06and demanding change now. As many of us
15:08know, this resolution is not actionable.
15:11It's not binding in that the passage of
15:14it doesn't require or mandate
15:16resignations or firings,
15:18but we hope that this inspires that
15:21because we are the teachers, we are the
15:24faculty, we are the people that look
15:26after and shepherd these students who
15:28need us and who can um who can and
15:31should trust us with their voice. Um and
15:34I think [snorts] yes, a 25 point margin
15:37is pretty resounding and I'm really I'm
15:40really thrilled that
15:42there can be hopefully new inroads made
15:44for new leadership to take things into a
15:46new direction.
15:49>> Now notice how this female music
15:50professor does not mention anything
15:52about the actual facts of the alleged
15:54gang rape or how the administration
15:55supposedly mishandled the allegations.
15:57Instead, she talks in very broad
15:58emotional terms
16:00about providing support for the students
16:02and you know, how the resolution feels
16:04good.
16:06And there's a reason for this. At some
16:07level, even the leftist music professors
16:08at Cornell understand that this moral
16:10panic
16:11has no basis whatsoever. It's all
16:13nonsense. And to prove that point,
16:15before we get into the new text messages
16:16that have surfaced in this case,
16:18which further destroyed the official
16:19narrative. We need to spend some time
16:21looking at the video from the Cornell
16:23faculty meeting last month where they
16:25passed this no confidence vote
16:28for Cornell leadership.
16:30Credit where it's due, the journalist
16:31Michael Tracy was the first to report on
16:33these videos. They're truly a remarkable
16:34look into the depravity of leftists,
16:36particularly when they're in the
16:38majority and emboldened, which is
16:40obviously the case on college campuses.
16:42So we'll start with a student who spoke
16:43at the faculty meeting to relay her dire
16:46concerns.
16:48This is some of the most unhinged,
16:49delusional footage you'll ever see.
16:52And keep in mind, she is representative
16:54of about 95%
16:56or so
16:57of students, particularly women at
16:59Cornell.
17:00Watch.
17:03>> During my first week here, I was
17:04horrified by the dangerous fraternity
17:06culture on this campus.
17:08I remember a young woman who was walking
17:10alone in Collegetown.
17:12Her steps were slow and shaky.
17:14She was obviously intoxicated.
17:16I came to realize that this was normal
17:18at Cornell.
17:19Freshmen women, dangerously intoxicated,
17:22trekking 30 minutes back to their dorms
17:24on North Campus past midnight.
17:27And no one stops and helps them.
17:30That same year, the number of
17:31undergraduate women experiencing
17:33nonconsensual sexual contact involving
17:36force or
17:37incapacitation at Cornell rose from 23%
17:40to 35%
17:43And then in my junior fall, I, like many
17:45of you, read a horrific article in the
17:47Sun
17:48detailing how a young woman was
17:50unconsensually drugged and gang raped by
17:53seven men for seven hours.
17:56In the days that followed, this
17:58administration published quiet
17:59statements on their website, not even
18:01bothering to send out a formal email to
18:04the student body.
18:05Many of my professors continued class as
18:08usual, not even mentioning the rape
18:10case, while me and my fellow students
18:13were barely able to go to class.
18:19>> Yes, students were barely able to go to
18:20class over this alleged gang rape that
18:22lasted over seven hours. First of all,
18:25it really needs to be said that leftists
18:26love to use the most incendiary language
18:28they possibly can because they know that
18:30if someone
18:31isn't following the facts closely, then
18:33they'll fill in the blanks with some
18:35insane scenario that doesn't remotely
18:37resemble the truth.
18:39They did this with Trump's criminal
18:41convictions when they said he was a
18:42felon who was convicted of 34 counts or
18:45whatever it is they said.
18:46And they know that if you mention the
18:47actual charges and how all 34 counts are
18:50basically the same fake accounting
18:51charge from a decade ago,
18:54then people will realize it's a farce.
18:56So instead they called Trump a 34-time
18:58convicted felon so that if you weren't
19:00paying attention, you'd assume he
19:01actually committed a real crime.
19:0334 of them, actually.
19:05They do the same thing when they talk
19:06about how thugs like Michael Brown were
19:08unarmed teenagers while admitting the
19:10fact that they were in the process of
19:11violently attacking police officers when
19:13they were shot.
19:15And along the same lines, when leftists
19:16say that the Cornell incident was a gang
19:18rape and that the students are terrified
19:20of walking around campus, they're trying
19:22to get you to imagine a situation where,
19:24you know, women are being snatched off
19:26the streets or something.
19:28They want your brain to fill in the
19:29blanks and conclude that this woman was
19:31kidnapped and somehow held against her
19:34will for seven hours.
19:36But in reality,
19:37if you don't get very high and very
19:40drunk
19:41and then voluntarily and eagerly
19:44participate in an orgy,
19:48then
19:50then you're not going to end up in an
19:51orgy.
19:52Now, that's that's pretty pretty easy to
19:54avoid. It's actually like the easiest
19:56thing in the world to avoid. Did you
19:57know that?
19:59It is so easy for it. There's there's
20:01probably nothing easier than avoiding an
20:03orgy.
20:05That's the kind of thing you have to go
20:06seek out.
20:08Most normal people wouldn't even know
20:10where to go to find one. Okay? So that's
20:13how obscure these things are.
20:16Easiest thing you could go your entire
20:18life and never come across an orgy or
20:21even see evidence of one, much less be
20:23involved in one.
20:27There are no roving gangs of Cornell
20:28rapists lurking behind the school
20:30library waiting to pounce. Um, upstate
20:33New York is not Mogadishu, at least not
20:35yet.
20:36You know, the very left is
20:37hyperventilating about gang rapes are
20:38also busy trying to turn New York into
20:40the kind of place where gang rapes might
20:42really start happening with frequency,
20:43but they haven't happened yet.
20:45But in this case, we know for a fact
20:47because of the accuser's own text
20:48messages that she was not kidnapped or
20:50assaulted in any way.
20:52You know, quite the opposite. She was
20:53proud of what she had done until word
20:55got out and her reputation began to fall
20:57apart. She wrote after the orgy, and I
20:59quote,
21:00I love you, king. At the end of the day,
21:02none of the sexual stuff was illegal,
21:04and honestly, I really like being with
21:05you and Matt. So anything anyone has to
21:08say about the gang bang
21:09is out of their jurisdiction. Insane
21:11slash jaw-dropping. If you have any
21:14regrets or anything you want to talk
21:15about, I'm always here to talk about it
21:16because that was a lot. Everyone's just
21:18jealous of us, but also like everyone
21:20needs to grow up cuz sexuality and sex
21:23and it's changing and stuff like this is
21:26going to become more common.
21:28Now,
21:30again, we just have to leave aside that
21:32these are Ivy
21:34This is an Ivy League student,
21:36supposedly,
21:37and this is how she's
21:39speaking or writing more specifically.
21:43Um,
21:44you know,
21:45there's just with the with the writing
21:47alone, there's no distinction between an
21:49Ivy League student
21:51and
21:53you know, someone who dropped out of
21:54high school or never even went. Like
21:56there's there's no
21:57In fact, the person who dropped out of
21:58high school probably might even be
21:59better when it comes to writing. Now,
22:01not to put too fine a point on it, but
22:05aside from how illegible and illiterate
22:07they are, those texts are not ones that
22:09you send
22:10to someone who just kidnapped you
22:12[snorts] and physically abused you for 7
22:15hours.
22:16She was offering to help them, probably
22:19because she knew that the male students
22:20were far more intoxicated than she was.
22:23She explicitly refers the encounter as a
22:25gang bang. She uses the terms insane and
22:27jaw-dropping to describe not the
22:29gangbang itself,
22:30but to describe anyone who would be
22:32critical of it.
22:34She thinks it's insane and jaw-dropping
22:35that anyone would have a problem with
22:37what what happened.
22:40And then she tries to comfort the man in
22:41case he has any regrets.
22:44Now the very interesting thing with that
22:45full text when you read it is that if
22:47anything, this is the kind of text that
22:49the rapist might send to the person that
22:52was raped.
22:54If anything, this sounds like
22:56like the grooming
22:58going on. You're the one telling them,
23:00oh, if you have any regrets, oh, it's
23:01okay. Everything's fine.
23:04Isn't that what the rapist does?
23:07That makes you seem like the initiator
23:09if not the aggressor.
23:12And you could probably make a better
23:14case for that than the reverse.
23:18There's a
23:19I don't think anyone was raped here, but
23:21the men probably have a better case for
23:23it
23:24than the the woman
23:26based on the text messages she was
23:28sending initially.
23:32Now things only changed when she
23:33discovered and I quote, my reputation is
23:35destroyed and I'm utterly ashamed.
23:38Which, you know, the proper response to
23:40that is like, okay, well, that's your
23:41problem.
23:43Probably shouldn't have behaved like a
23:46You you behaved disgustingly like a
23:48and and so that's why you're
23:50ashamed.
23:53You should be.
23:54Your reputation actually should be
23:55destroyed.
23:57And then weeks later they canceled her
23:59invite to the Halloween party at the
24:00frat and the rest was history.
24:03Let's say you run a small business and
24:04you've been thinking about expanding for
24:06the last couple of years. You've found
24:08the right location. You know there's
24:10demand and you've done the math.
24:12Everything makes sense, but you keep
24:14putting it off because you want to wait
24:16until the timing is absolutely perfect.
24:19You have all the money sitting in the
24:20bank.
24:21Six months later someone else opens a
24:22business in that exact location starts
24:24serving the customers you could have
24:25been serving. Now obviously you
24:27shouldn't make reckless financial but
24:29there's also a cost to waiting around
24:31indefinitely, especially when you
24:33already have a successful business and a
24:35real opportunity to grow it.
24:37This is why Cardiff is worth
24:38considering. Cardiff provides funding
24:40for established small businesses without
24:42the endless paperwork and delays
24:43associated with traditional banks. Their
24:45application takes just 3 minutes and
24:47applying won't impact your personal
24:49credit score
24:51at all. Approval in minutes, funding
24:53same day. Qualified businesses can
24:55receive up to $500,000
24:57in same day funding. And Cardiff has
24:59funded more than $12 billion to American
25:02small businesses. If you've been
25:04operating for at least 1 year, you
25:05generate at least $20,000 in monthly
25:07revenue, you can see what funding
25:09options may be available to you. You
25:11still need to make a smart business
25:12decision. Cardiff simply gives you a way
25:15to pursue an opportunity without
25:16spending weeks waiting for the bank to
25:18get around to your application. Go to
25:20cardiff.co/walsh. That's
25:22cardiff.co/walsh.
25:23Real growth, fast funding. Cardiff,
25:26borrow better.
25:28Apparently, there are only two
25:29acceptable opinions when it comes to
25:30college. Either everyone must attend
25:32regardless of the cost
25:34or every college is completely useless
25:36and no one should ever go to any of
25:38them. As usual, both sides are avoiding
25:40the most important question. Is the
25:41education you're getting at a particular
25:43institution actually worth it?
25:45A lot of higher education deserves the
25:46criticism it receives and then some, but
25:48Grand Canyon University offers something
25:50different. GCU has more than 100 online
25:53undergraduate degrees, giving students
25:54the flexibility to begin college or
25:56return and finish without putting the
25:58rest of their lives on hold. And
26:00affordability isn't just a slogan. In
26:02addition to federal grants and aid,
26:03GCU's online students received nearly
26:05$200 million in institutional
26:08scholarships in 2025 alone. What I
26:11respect about GCU is that it combines
26:13practical career preparation with the
26:15free market system, a welcoming
26:17Christian worldview, and free and open
26:18discourse.
26:19It's easy to say higher education is
26:21outdated, irrelevant, but at Grand
26:23Canyon University, they don't settle for
26:25the status quo. They shatter it. GCU's
26:27accredited MBA program is 100% online
26:30and is designed to shape leaders through
26:32servant leadership. GCU can help you
26:35take your passion and scale your
26:36business to serve your community. This
26:38is purpose-driven education. Take
26:40action, find your purpose. Grand Canyon
26:42University. Visit gcu.edu.
26:47Now the other extraordinary part of that
26:48clip is that the student says that she
26:50was horrified to see drunk women walking
26:53around the campus of Cornell past
26:55midnight
26:56without anyone stopping to help them.
26:59Although it's not remotely clear what
27:01help these women needed exactly.
27:04Do they think all female students need
27:05an armed escort or else the non-existent
27:07roving Cornell rape gangs are going to
27:09descend on them?
27:11How paternalistic do we need to be
27:13in order to meet the demands of these
27:14feminist nutcases?
27:16Do women need chaperones whenever they
27:18go out in public?
27:20I mean,
27:22if that's what you're advocating, if
27:23you're advocating to bring bring back
27:24the patriarchy and women can't be
27:26trusted to walk around at night alone
27:28and can't be trusted to exercise their
27:30own agency, um if that's what you're
27:33advocating, then come out and say it.
27:36Yeah, but I would say that if a woman
27:37goes out and get and decides to get
27:39drunk
27:40and then has to walk home,
27:43how's that anyone else's problem
27:45or anyone else's fault?
27:47If a random guy's walking by, why is
27:49that a problem he has to solve?
27:51You went out to a party, got drunk, and
27:53now you got to walk home. I got to solve
27:54that problem for you? Why? I got my own
27:56problems.
27:57The woman in the clip
27:59saw a female drunkard stumbling around
28:01at midnight
28:03who there's no indication, by the way,
28:04that she even tried to help. Did you try
28:06to help her?
28:07So she's watching this scene and just
28:09sitting there, someone should help her.
28:11This is disgusting that no one is
28:13helping that woman that I'm also not
28:14helping.
28:17But she immediately determined that the
28:18drunk woman's behavior is the fault of
28:21every man on campus.
28:24And by the way, this is not an
28:25incidental point, the proliferation of
28:28false accusations just make it all the
28:30more certain
28:31that no man will ever should ever stop
28:35to help a drunk college girl, whatever
28:39help even means here.
28:41Okay, if he escorts her home or gives
28:43her a ride in his car,
28:45God forbid, worst decision of all, he
28:47has just set himself up so that the
28:49drunk lady can wake up tomorrow or next
28:51year or 30 years from now
28:54and accuse him of assault.
28:57And then he goes to jail for 10 years.
29:01You know, and suddenly this act of
29:02helping becomes after the fact, you
29:04know, kidnapping and rape. So
29:07no, there will be no helping.
29:09I would caution any man I I would my own
29:11sons if they were in college, I would
29:12say that no, do not help. Do not help.
29:16Sorry, we don't live in that world
29:17anymore.
29:18You got drunk and you're a woman, you
29:19got to walk home. I guess you're
29:21walking.
29:22Your dorm is an hour away. I guess, you
29:24know, well, good luck.
29:26You got to get some cardio tonight
29:28because nope, no one is helping.
29:32Now you might be tempted to dismiss this
29:33footage because it's just some dumb
29:35student, but the Cornell faculty was
29:37even worse.
29:39Watch.
29:40>> Thank you. My name is Julia Chang. I'm
29:42an associate professor and director of
29:44undergraduate studies in the Department
29:46of Romance Studies. I am also the posse
29:4814 mentor for the College of Arts and
29:51Sciences.
29:52This semester I worked exclusively with
29:54first year first semester students who
29:57are absolutely terrified. They feel
29:59unsafe and they are shocked that this
30:02case happened in 2024 and that there
30:05wasn't an urgency when that happened. We
30:07[clears throat] need to reckon with the
30:08facts that trust is completely eroded on
30:11this campus between students and
30:13administration.
30:14>> And we also want to ask
30:16someone like
30:19Uh
30:20I really want to pursue this. Is rape
30:23a less destructive expressive activity
30:26than protesting against genocide?
30:44>> I recognize the passion around this
30:46issue and the emotional issue with Gaza,
30:48but look, these are two separate areas
30:50here.
30:54So the a question so idiotic that it
30:56just left this guy speechless. The
30:57president of Cornell couldn't couldn't
30:59believe what he was hearing.
31:01In case you couldn't hear it, the
31:02question which came from a professor in
31:03Asian Studies was, and I quote,
31:05maybe I'm dumb.
31:08Well,
31:08you said it,
31:10not me. But I really want an answer to
31:11this. Is rape a less destructive
31:14expressive activity
31:16than protesting against genocide?
31:20Well,
31:22the answer to that question is, first of
31:23all, the first part of the question is
31:25really easy. Yeah, you're dumb.
31:27Okay, you're hopelessly stupid. We can
31:29cover that.
31:30Um that's not much of that's that's not
31:32that's not a that's not a trick
31:33question. That's not going to stump
31:34anyone.
31:35Um and in fact, you're a disgrace to the
31:37entire country, not just Cornell. And it
31:39is a disgrace that you are a professor
31:41who's responsible for educating students
31:42when you're that stupid.
31:44Even putting aside the fact that she was
31:46trying the point she was trying to make,
31:47the question itself is incoherent. It's
31:49gibberish.
31:51It's a non sequitur.
31:53No one talks like this. If If you're
31:54going to do a gotcha question, the words
31:55have to get to gel together in a kind of
31:57way that makes sense. People are
31:59supposed to hear a gotcha question and
32:00go, oh,
32:02she really got him.
32:03We're not supposed to say, can this
32:04woman speak English?
32:06What?
32:07That was the most convoluted way you
32:09could possibly phrase a gotcha question.
32:11Now if you try to analyze what she's
32:12saying, you know, it's supposed to be a
32:14catty way to make the claim that Cornell
32:16treats rapists better than the students
32:18who protested for Gaza on campus a
32:19couple years ago.
32:21Now of course, the fundamental problem
32:22with that reasoning is that the Cornell
32:24Seven didn't actually rape anyone.
32:27Number one.
32:28Meanwhile, the Gaza protesters set up
32:30illegal encampments, assaulted police,
32:32defaced statues and buildings,
32:34um blocked the entrance to the dining
32:37hall and the library. In other words,
32:38they committed obvious, verifiable
32:41crimes documented in plain view of
32:43police officers and everybody else.
32:46So they were not accused of crimes on
32:47the basis of a civil lawsuit filed two
32:49years after the fact based on the
32:50narrative of a woman
32:52who was really repeatedly has repeatedly
32:55changed her story.
32:57Other than that, you know, it's a
32:58perfect analogy.
33:00The female Asian studies professor
33:01really nailed it.
33:03And, you know, not to get sidetracked
33:05here, but
33:07this is the kind of Tourette's syndrome
33:08that leftists, especially leftist
33:10academics have now, of course have had
33:11for a long time.
33:13Anytime you try to talk about any issue,
33:15they'll shout, oh yeah?
33:17Well, is that worse than the genocide in
33:19Gaza?
33:21It doesn't matter I mean, especially on
33:22on on X this happens or you could post
33:24anything.
33:26You could post about, oh I had, you
33:27know, I had a hamburger from Five Guys,
33:29it was good. Oh, well what about the
33:31Can they have five guys in in Gaza?
33:35Invariably, whatever issue you're
33:36discussing uh has nothing to do with
33:38what happened in Gaza, you know,
33:40genocide or not.
33:41Or my favorite, if you care about any
33:43topic or issue, they'll swoop in and
33:45demand to know whether you care more
33:47about that topic
33:49or issue than what's happening in Gaza.
33:53And in my case, I'm happy to say uh
33:54yeah.
33:56Whatever whatever they're saying, oh you
33:57care more about this than Gaza?
33:59Um yeah.
34:01I do. Uh I I do care more about a great
34:04many issues than anything that is
34:06happening or has ever happened or will
34:08ever happen in Gaza.
34:11Cuz I actually don't care about Gaza at
34:12all.
34:14It's not my country, it's not my
34:15problem.
34:17It's not even on my list of my top 500
34:19concerns.
34:20And if you think that sounds cruel or
34:22callous or something,
34:23you you really shouldn't have much
34:25trouble understanding it because I feel
34:26about Gaza exactly as you feel about
34:29literally thousands of atrocities
34:31unfolding on the globe right this
34:33moment.
34:34All of which you are also ignoring.
34:38You don't stop to think about them ever
34:41because they don't concern you.
34:43And that makes a lot of sense.
34:45Anyway,
34:47then there was the female romance
34:48studies professor who reports the the
34:50first-year students are terrified and
34:52feel unsafe,
34:54presumably because their teachers are
34:55telling them that they should feel
34:57terrified and unsafe.
34:59It's one of the many reasons why it's a
35:00bad idea to send your children to these
35:02overwhelmingly left-wing schools,
35:05especially if you're you know,
35:06especially if you have young men,
35:09if you have sons.
35:11That's the worst thing place you can
35:13send send them. These teachers are
35:14mostly hysterical, emotionally
35:16incontinent women, and low testosterone
35:18men,
35:20and they go out of their way to make
35:21their students as unhinged as they are.
35:23It's like watching a cult meeting.
35:26And by the way, although this will shock
35:27absolutely no one, the vast majority of
35:29the faculty members who rejected this
35:30nonsense and voted against this
35:31resolution are in the science and
35:33engineering departments.
35:35So it's the humanities teachers who
35:36contribute nothing to society who are
35:38leading the charge. Their careers are
35:40completely pointless, so they feel a
35:41compulsion to be part of something
35:43greater and change the world and
35:45resist systemic injustice.
35:48And they're willing to invent that
35:49systemic injustice if they have to.
35:51Meanwhile, the scientists for the most
35:53for the most part anyway,
35:55tend to be more interested in actual
35:56problems rather than doing interviews
35:58with the New York Times.
35:59Although there are many exceptions to
36:01that.
36:02And that's the right approach because
36:03the longer this farce drags on, the more
36:05it falls apart.
36:07It's already completely collapsed as a
36:08narrative, but somehow new text messages
36:10keep getting released.
36:11More evidence surfaces to bury the
36:13narrative even further.
36:16This is from the free press reporting on
36:17new text messages that show how the
36:19accuser's sorority
36:21pushed the idea that the woman was
36:22assaulted as a way of protecting the
36:24sorority's reputation.
36:26Quote, text messages between Jane Doe's
36:28sorority sisters paint a picture of a
36:30group of women in crisis mode, having
36:32been made vulnerable by association to
36:34the kind of reputational damage that
36:36would threaten the entire sorority's
36:38status within the small and precarious
36:40ecosystem of Cornell's Greek
36:42life-centric social scene. For Jane Doe,
36:44fact that she has severely transgressed
36:46the norms of her community appears to
36:48come as a surprise and a disappointment.
36:50Within a few days of the incident, she
36:52wrote to one of the men, bro, everyone
36:54knows um I'm incredibly stressed out,
36:58but
36:59uh
37:00everyone knows I'm incredibly stressed
37:01out, two different sentences. From there
37:02her honey is only grows. People are
37:04talking, people are judging, people are
37:06telling a version of the story, her
37:07story that is eclipsing her own account
37:10and that strips her of the mantle of the
37:12adventurous, branding her instead with
37:14the scarlet letter of the Even the
37:16people who care about her have come up
37:18with their own countervailing narrative
37:20to contradict her own, insisting to
37:21anyone who will listen and to Jane
37:23herself that she was the victim of
37:25sexual coercion.
37:27Now that passage is referring to texts
37:28that were unearthed by the New York
37:29Times a few days ago.
37:31Every single one of them is devastating
37:32for this woman's lawsuit and we'll start
37:34with a text that was sent on October
37:3621st, 2024 around 6:00 p.m.
37:39from one of the fraternity members she's
37:40now accusing of rape.
37:42This this is the day after the alleged
37:45assault.
37:46He writes quote,
37:48hey, I just got your number and heard
37:49that I may have said some mean things
37:51when I walked in the room, but I truly
37:52do not know what I said. Want to make
37:54amends with you because I'm not a mean
37:56person. Scotty also said he's sorry and
37:58should have never been in that room.
38:00Then the accuser responds, quote,
38:03I really appreciate the text and I
38:05didn't think in your heart you were a
38:07mean guy or anything. I figured it was a
38:08defense thing because like that was
38:11obviously an insane night and I think
38:13everyone was really confused, drunk,
38:14high, and nervous. I really do still
38:16think highly of sci-fi and I'm not a
38:19person to pretend I don't know people
38:22after any sexual affair no matter the
38:23magnitude. So I do look forward to
38:25seeing y'all around while we're all
38:27obviously denying what happened to
38:29anyone who asks.
38:31I hope that we can joke about all this
38:32in private obviously later down the
38:33line. Also I do remember there were two
38:35Scotties unless I was getting effed
38:38with,
38:39but one of them sat beside me and told
38:40me to take a few minutes before I got up
38:42and I really appreciated his care for my
38:43well-being. Sometimes it's easy to feel
38:45a little
38:46in a heat heated sexual situation. I
38:48appreciated his pausing for me to
38:50collect myself.
38:51If you wouldn't mind telling him, I said
38:53thank you, that would be great.
38:56Then a heart emoji.
38:58Now the male student uh responds that
39:00yes, there were two Scotties present.
39:02Uh she responds quote, I think we all
39:04have a soul bond now cuz very few people
39:07can say they've had an experience like
39:09that.
39:10While it's good to keep it away from the
39:11public, I don't think it's something to
39:12feel ashamed of in private.
39:14Thank God there are two Scotties. That
39:16was literally the trippiest part of the
39:18night.
39:20Shortly afterwards, she uh texts another
39:21male student.
39:23She's now accused of uh she's now
39:24accusing of rape.
39:26She writes quote, it'll be funny in a
39:28couple months. We should smoke again
39:30sometime, but like leave out the extra 5
39:33billion men and ketamine.
39:35Marked it on rice purity, so I'm good.
39:38I've got all the mom lore I need.
39:42I had to look this up, but when she says
39:43marked it on rice purity, she's
39:45referring to an online survey that lists
39:47dozens of different sexual experiences
39:49and people check off the experiences
39:51they've had,
39:52including apparently group sex.
39:54So she's joking about the whole
39:55experience, uh really bragging about it,
39:58saying it was a wild experience that she
40:00can tell her future kids about.
40:02That's the mom lore part of the text.
40:06Now of course, for a lot of reasons you
40:08feel bad for her future kids if any any
40:10ever exist.
40:12This is the kind of thing you just sit
40:13down Well, you can sit at the dinner
40:14table,
40:16tell your kids about the gang bang you
40:17had in in in college.
40:22Um and then a week after the incident at
40:23the frat house, some anonymous comments
40:25are posted on the gossip forum called
40:27Greek Rank. Uh one of the posts reads
40:30are Chi Phi brothers Crips or Bloods
40:32because I hear they have been doing hell
40:34gang banging.
40:35Another posts read re uh read they do
40:38drugs and gang rape to sophomore, report
40:41them.
40:42Okay, supposedly these posts changed the
40:44woman's view of what happened that
40:45night. Of course, since they're
40:46anonymous comments and she just happened
40:48to come across It's entirely possible
40:49that she posted those messages herself.
40:51It's also possible a member of her
40:52sorority wrote them.
40:55You know, we have no idea.
40:57And whoever did write them, it's not
40:59evidence of anything. It's just someone
41:00repeating a rumor they heard.
41:02You know, I could sit here and tell you
41:04about how great PureTalk is or I could
41:06just read a comment from one of their
41:09customers named Deanna. She says, we've
41:12been with PureTalk for several years now
41:13and absolutely love it. Great coverage,
41:15great customer service, great pricing.
41:17Now, if that's not the experience you're
41:19getting from your current wireless
41:20company, it's time to switch. And in
41:22honor of providing great coverage, great
41:24customer service, and great pricing,
41:26PureTalk decided to extend their
41:28unlimited for life offer for just a
41:30little bit longer. Unlimited talk, text,
41:32and unlimited data for just $29.95 a
41:35month for the rest of your life. Again,
41:37this was their top shelf plan, normally
41:39$65 a month, but you lock in at just
41:41$29.95
41:43a month for life. No contract, no
41:45cancellation fees. Go to
41:46puretalk.com/walsh
41:48and make the switch in as little as 10
41:49minutes. Again, that's
41:50puretalk.com/walsh
41:52for unlimited data for life
41:55with PureTalk. Taxes and fees not
41:57included. Some restrictions apply. See
41:58puretalk.com for details.
42:02Then we get to the key message from the
42:03sorority. This is from October 27th. The
42:05accuser's big sister at her sorority,
42:07basically a student mentor,
42:09is asked about the rumors that are
42:11circulating about about the accuser and
42:12she writes, quote,
42:14yeah, shut it down. This is out of
42:16control. Actually disgusting. It's
42:18disgusting that people think this is
42:19funny to talk about when it would have
42:21when it would be rape if it were to
42:22happen.
42:24Some pifi girl started it. She had a
42:26threesome, but that's it.
42:28Per usual, people love to blame women
42:30for being abuse victims or make them out
42:32to be Anyway, blaming the victim,
42:35not the rapist.
42:37We're always blaming the the victim, not
42:38the rapist. Now, reading between the
42:40lines, what this text means is that
42:42while the accuser was downplaying what
42:43happened, suggesting it was a wild and
42:45consensual experience, senior members of
42:47her sorority were becoming frustrated as
42:50the free press reported.
42:52They knew that their damage control
42:54wasn't working. No one was buying their
42:56story that this woman had merely engaged
42:57in a threesome,
42:59and this was reflecting very badly on
43:01the whole sorority.
43:03So the senior sorority member in this
43:04message floats an alternative,
43:07you know, kind of brainstorming. She
43:08suggests that even if the rumors are
43:10correct,
43:11their sorority is still insulated from
43:13responsibility because in that scenario,
43:15quote, it would be rape.
43:18Now she never explains how exactly she'd
43:20come to this conclusion or what facts
43:22would justify this change.
43:24She had no evidence to support the
43:25accusation at all, but she mentions it
43:27in the text thread as a way for the
43:29sorority to reclaim the moral high
43:31ground.
43:32It's a very common impulse, especially
43:33in left-wing circles where victimhood is
43:35the most important currency.
43:37As Kat Rosenfield, the journalist who
43:39wrote the free press article, put it,
43:40quote,
43:41uh it is basic human nature in the face
43:44of shame or regret to want to reframe
43:46what happened in a way that unburdens
43:48you or someone you care about
43:51of those feelings.
43:53Now once the sorority began talking like
43:55this, it's natural to assume that the
43:56idea eventually filtered down to the
43:57accuser.
43:59Her friends and sorority members were
44:00giving her an out,
44:02and then the fraternity, in the eyes of
44:03the accuser,
44:05gave her a reason to take it.
44:07And then comes the critical October 30th
44:08text, the night before the Halloween
44:10party, where the fraternity president
44:12president, after initially saying the
44:13accuser was welcome at the frat house,
44:16disinvites her from the party.
44:19The greatest sin you can commit against
44:21a girl like this,
44:22and she's furious about it.
44:24Quote,
44:25I was uninvited,
44:27but of course it was for me. I knew this
44:29was going to happen. The woman will
44:30always get the short end of the stick.
44:32Y'all aren't my friends. Y'all are
44:33covering your asses.
44:35The fraternity president can go F
44:37himself. I'm done. He is not a friend of
44:38mine.
44:41Now the key thing about this is that
44:44she really wanted to go to a party
44:46with these guys.
44:48So she really wanted to go to a party
44:50with these guys,
44:53who she now says so she was supposedly
44:56like kidnapped and held against her will
44:58and brutally raped for seven hours and
45:00she desperately wants to go to a party
45:01with them and is furious that she can't.
45:06And this is when she goes scorched
45:07earth.
45:08You know, the guy tries to reach out to
45:10her to patch things up on Halloween day.
45:12He even says she's welcome at the party
45:15and she refuses to talk to him. And then
45:17on November 3rd, 2024 for the first time
45:19she sends a text where she suggests that
45:21she was assaulted.
45:23And this is the first time she does
45:24this. Quote, let's be clear that 90% of
45:26what happened that night was not
45:28consensual.
45:30And after that, she goes to the ER and
45:31claims that she was assaulted.
45:33So this is a sequence of events that
45:35obviously does not support any lawsuit
45:38against these Cornell students, much
45:39less criminal charge. It's a farce
45:42that the New York Attorney General
45:43Letitia James was ever appointed to
45:45investigate this case.
45:47And it's no accident that she stepped
45:48aside by the way and appointed a former
45:50federal prosecutor to handle it
45:52one day after the midterm elections.
45:55Not very subtle. This whole case was a
45:57political operation by the Democrat
45:59Party to mobilize female voters ahead of
46:01the midterms.
46:03And before that, to all appearances, it
46:04was a PR operation that was first
46:06suggested by a sorority
46:08that was desperate to control the
46:09narrative about one of its members who
46:11was completely out of control
46:14and destroying their reputation by
46:16extension.
46:18Now it makes you wonder about those
46:19allegations about Russell Brand
46:22and all the other allegations like this
46:24which only surfaced months or even years
46:26after the fact.
46:28You know, a lot of women come to regret
46:29their behavior and when they do
46:32their friends are often very willing to
46:34help them come up with an alternative
46:36explanation.
46:38You know, alternative facts
46:40about what happened.
46:42And if they arrive at this alternative
46:43explanation, the legal system will
46:47go along every step of the way.
46:50The normal rules are inverted.
46:53The accuser is presumed to be correct.
46:57Even if
46:58she's on the record with
47:00one version of events and says it wasn't
47:02right, she can come back years later and
47:04say, actually, I think it was.
47:06Even with no additional evidence,
47:07nothing else, she could just say,
47:09actually, you know what? Actually, yeah,
47:11I think it was.
47:13And the legal system will say, oh, okay.
47:15Whatever you think.
47:18The facts are whatever you happen to
47:20say.
47:21You are God and you can change reality
47:24retroactively based on your own whim.
47:30The defendant is presumed to be guilty
47:31and if he tries to defend himself, the
47:33judge will attack him for it during the
47:34sentencing.
47:36You know, one of the biggest successes
47:37of the Trump administration has been
47:38reforming the Title IX process on
47:40college campuses.
47:42As the Cornell case and the Russell
47:43Brand case both demonstrate,
47:46we need similar reforms
47:48for the legal system at large. Give
47:49defendants the right to cross-examine
47:51accusers about their own history.
47:54The right to publicly identify their
47:55accusers. Enough with the Jane Doe
47:57nonsense.
47:59And above all, we need real consequences
48:01for women who make these false
48:02accusations.
48:04Whatever crime they falsely accused
48:06someone of committing,
48:08that should be an equivalent punishment
48:10for the crime. But whatever whatever
48:12punishment they get should be the
48:13punishment that the men would have
48:15gotten had they been convicted.
48:19Lock them up
48:20and the false allegations will stop.
48:24Start talking about these false accusing
48:25women uh using terms that are
48:28appropriate,
48:29which is these are dangerous people.
48:32Women who make false accusations are
48:34they are dangerous predators. They are a
48:36danger. They are a danger to any man
48:38they come across.
48:42And until then, stay far away from
48:43college campuses like this.
48:47And of course, avoid these kinds of
48:48casual encounters entirely.
48:51Uh
48:52if you're a man.
48:53Or if you're a woman.
48:55It's not worth it.
48:56You know, if they can delete Russell
48:57Brand from the internet
48:59and from free society,
49:02they can do it to you.
49:04They're certainly looking for more lives
49:06to destroy.
49:07And after the hysteria over these cases,
49:09which somehow is still continuing to
49:11this day,
49:12the best decision you can make
49:14is to never give them the opportunity.
49:18That'll do it for the show today and
49:19this week. We'll talk to you on Monday.
49:21Have a great weekend. God speed.
49:27>> [music]
49:30>> Father, I used to feel Christ.
49:34I cannot feel anything here.
49:47>> They take me out of my bed
49:49and they brought me here and they tell
49:51me nothing.
49:52>> What have I done?
49:53>> Article 58
49:54counter revolutionary activity.
49:56>> That is all I know.
49:58>> They have to deal with so many enemies
50:00of the state, all of whom claim their
50:03innocence, who protest, who cry.
50:09>> [panting]
50:13>> There are no answers here
50:16other than the ones they put in your
50:18mouth.
50:18>> They will break.
50:21Today is your opportunity to demonstrate
50:24your loyalty to the people.
50:28>> I'd like to know why I am here.
50:30>> Of course.
50:34But you already know, don't you?
50:36>> Must believe in something greater than
50:39the party.
50:40>> You will remember your duty.
50:42>> I've told you I know nothing.
50:43>> They growl like a feral animal.
50:47>> You stink of failure.
50:49>> You want me to lie.
50:50>> Still a drunk. Damn you!
50:54>> They all break.
50:59>> Maybe.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of New Evidence Completely Upends Cornell 7 Case | Ep. 1873 by Matt Walsh, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 8,847 words across 1,549 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.