Neil deGrasse Tyson BEST Arguments Against God — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Neil, do you you're an agnostic, right?
- 0:04>> That's that word comes closest to
- 0:06describing my circumstances. Yes.
- 0:08>> Uh,
- 0:08>> have you really looked into Jesus Christ
- 0:10and if he um if he is the true God?
- 0:14>> Yes, I have. Yes. So, I I I look more
- 0:17broadly and I take a step back and I
- 0:19look at the world's religions and I look
- 0:20at the world's gods that have been
- 0:23praised throughout the history of our
- 0:25species. And that number is huge. It's
- 0:28almost an unlimited scroll. Where I find
- 0:31myself returning is uh to 1755
- 0:35in uh Portugal, Lisbon. Tens of
- 0:39thousands of people were killed in the
- 0:41church
- 0:43during this uh this case. Then because
- 0:46the epicenter was offshore,
- 0:49it wasn't just the earthquake. There was
- 0:51a tsunami that followed that basically
- 0:54wiped Lisbon from the map. something
- 0:56like 80,000 people died. There is a God.
- 1:00That God is either not all powerful
- 1:04or not all good because many innocent
- 1:08people died or maybe 80,000 people were
- 1:11all criminals. But were the children
- 1:12criminals? Were the you know the women
- 1:15and children who were just trying to you
- 1:17know keep the household. So there's no
- 1:20good answer to that other than the the
- 1:22the repeated one which is God works in
- 1:25mysterious ways. Well, that means you
- 1:27don't really understand God. And if you
- 1:29don't understand God, why do you believe
- 1:30you understand him if something nice
- 1:32happens? Oh, that's God working
- 1:34miracles. No, if you don't understand
- 1:35God, are you going to cherrypick how and
- 1:37when and where you claim to understand
- 1:39the motives? So I step back and I see
- 1:41this and all I can say is I remain
- 1:46unconvinced
- 1:47that there is any kind of divine power
- 1:50at work anywhere in the universe based
- 1:53on what I see.
- 1:54>> Why does religion have such a persistent
- 1:56hold on human thought despite all that
- 1:59we know of science?
- 2:00>> Uh
- 2:02yeah, I think there are several ways one
- 2:04can address that question. Consider not
- 2:07long ago when so much of the western
- 2:12world was the state was the religion and
- 2:17we have actually moved quite a distance
- 2:19from that compared with 200 years ago,
- 2:23300 years ago, 400 years ago, the era,
- 2:25the Inquisition and this sort of thing.
- 2:27And so so to say that it has such a
- 2:31grip, it has a fraction of the grip that
- 2:34it once did on the operations of human
- 2:37conduct and of society. So the real
- 2:40question is if implicit in that is given
- 2:43what we know of science,
- 2:45why would religion still have any grip
- 2:48at all? Not does why does it still have
- 2:50a big grip? Because it's not a big grip
- 2:52when you look um in the in the developed
- 2:55world. So in fact most of Europe are
- 2:58just they're a you know the whole
- 2:59countries where religion has essentially
- 3:01disappeared entirely and the countries
- 3:04are not the countries are not full of
- 3:06violence and you know it's just the
- 3:09assumption that you have to be religious
- 3:10to be moral is a false one. It's
- 3:12empirically false because you just look
- 3:14around in places where that's the case.
- 3:17So um
- 3:22so so that's one fact and pull away from
- 3:26that a little. There's plenty of what
- 3:29goes on in religious texts that has
- 3:32tremendous value to how to think about
- 3:34life and how to treat one another. Uh in
- 3:38fact uh Jefferson created what was
- 3:41essentially what you can think of as the
- 3:42Jeff Thomas Jefferson the Jefferson
- 3:44Bible. I don't know if you ever heard of
- 3:46this. He went through the Bible
- 3:49and I think both the Old and the New
- 3:52Testaments and he crossed off everything
- 3:54that was sort of mythical, magical,
- 3:56uh things that clearly violated known
- 3:59laws of nature and kept the rest and
- 4:02said here is the the stuff of the Bible
- 4:06that will should have value to any
- 4:08modern person going forward. If you look
- 4:11at people who are religious today who
- 4:14are not in conflict with science, they
- 4:17have viewed their religious texts as a
- 4:20spiritual
- 4:22something that gives them spiritual
- 4:23support, not as a science textbook. the
- 4:26the inter the conflict in society is
- 4:29when you have those who are still
- 4:30religious who want to use the religious
- 4:33text as their access point to
- 4:36understanding the natural world and
- 4:39persistent efforts of the past to make
- 4:43that happen have just simply failed that
- 4:46the the Bible does not work as a science
- 4:49textbook in fact Galileo knew this and
- 4:52he himself was a religious man he's
- 4:55famously quoted as saying the Bible
- 4:58tells you how to go to heaven, not how
- 5:00the heavens go.
- 5:04So on that scale, the the the conflict
- 5:07comes about when that subset of the
- 5:10religious community feels threatened by
- 5:12scientific discoveries that are
- 5:15different from how they interpret what
- 5:17should the natural world should be in
- 5:19the Bible. I I think it's that point
- 5:21where you get to the concept of the god
- 5:22of the gaps the the you go we do not
- 5:26understand this you know science takes
- 5:29us so far but we don't understand
- 5:31anything beyond that therefore that's
- 5:33God
- 5:34>> the stuff that we don't get that's God
- 5:36and the trouble with that is the moment
- 5:38that you actually go no we do understand
- 5:40that now is people are going well did
- 5:42God just go away then
- 5:45and and it goes back you know nice
- 5:47simple things like the rainbow
- 5:49the point where you go, "Wo, the rainbow
- 5:51actually, it's it's an optical effect.
- 5:52It's not something magic that gets put
- 5:54up in the sky to memorialize the flood."
- 5:57>> Plus, did you know that everyone sees a
- 5:59unique rainbow?
- 6:00>> No.
- 6:01>> That's right. Um, the rainbow is an
- 6:04optical effect for the person who sees
- 6:06it. So, if you stand 10 feet to my left,
- 6:09you see an actual a different rainbow
- 6:11than I see. It's a remarkable uh fun
- 6:13fact about rainbows. My my my my
- 6:16favorite fun fact about rainbows is the
- 6:19fact that they were originally believed
- 6:20to have six color bands, but that Newton
- 6:24added added indigo and violet.
- 6:27>> Newton liked he liked
- 6:28>> because he liked his seven
- 6:29>> the number seven. He had the mystical
- 6:30feeling for the number seven. Throws in
- 6:33indigo that no one else sees.
- 6:34>> Nobody I mean hands up here who actually
- 6:37goes
- 6:38>> indigo violet. There's the indigo. You
- 6:40don't. You just go
- 6:42>> purple.
- 6:43>> Yeah, exactly. go back purple. But
- 6:47>> another thing about the rainbow, because
- 6:49each rainbow is unique to the viewer, it
- 6:51can only be a rainbow that is exactly
- 6:55face on to you. You've never seen a
- 6:57rainbow that was like at an oblique
- 6:59angle. Think about it. They're exactly
- 7:02hemispherical in front of you. That's
- 7:04why you can never get to the base of the
- 7:06rainbow,
- 7:08cuz that would mean your perspective on
- 7:10it would change. That's what makes it a
- 7:12good place to hide the gold. Okay,
- 7:16in case you didn't know. All right.
- 7:20>> Now, when you talk about these things,
- 7:23somebody in the audience must come up, I
- 7:25assume, and say, "Well,
- 7:28>> oh, we only understand 4% of this
- 7:30stuff."
- 7:31>> Yeah, that's great. So, how how is that
- 7:34different from Bill O'Reilly saying,
- 7:35"Well, in that case, the rest of it's
- 7:36gone. We You guys are just You're just
- 7:39expounding beliefs here. You've got no
- 7:41evidence
- 7:43>> for the 96%.
- 7:44>> The difference is we do understand the
- 7:47tides. The tides are part of the 4% we
- 7:49understand. So Bill O'Reilly is giving a
- 7:52list of things that are fully
- 7:53understood. If he had given a list of
- 7:56things that are not understood, okay,
- 7:58that would be a different reaction and
- 8:01it would be less susceptible to comedic
- 8:04mockery
- 8:06than saying tides come in and out. You
- 8:08can't explain that. He's like, "Yes, we
- 8:10can. We've known that one for the last
- 8:11couple hundred years. Give me a better
- 8:14example." So, if he said, "There's dark
- 8:16matter and there this dark energy
- 8:20forcing an expansion of the universe
- 8:23so fast that it's accelerating." You
- 8:24can't explain that, right? We can't
- 8:27explain that. Okay.
- 8:30I don't think he knows enough physics to
- 8:31be able to tell us what it is we don't
- 8:33understand yet. That would have been a
- 8:35more interesting exchange with the
- 8:36atheist guy. I I forgot his name.
- 8:38forgive me but the guy who who he was
- 8:40interviewing now if he wants to use that
- 8:43as evidence for God but then we just
- 8:46have to come back and say well
- 8:50doesn't mean if you don't understand
- 8:53something and the community of
- 8:55physicists don't understanding
- 8:57understand it that means God did it is
- 8:58that is that how you want to play this
- 9:00game because if it is here's a list of
- 9:03the things in the past that the
- 9:06physicist at the time didn't understand
- 9:08and a talk show you might have conducted
- 9:10200 years ago would have said the
- 9:12planets do retrograde can't understand
- 9:14that must be a god
- 9:17and we'd say you know you're right and
- 9:19then 10 years later we understand it so
- 9:21what do you do so you're if that's how
- 9:24if that's how you want to invoke your
- 9:26evidence for God then god is an ever
- 9:28receding
- 9:29pocket of scientific ignorance that's
- 9:33getting smaller and smaller and smaller
- 9:36as time moves on. So just be ready for
- 9:38that to happen if that's how you want to
- 9:40come at the problem.
- 9:42So that's just simply the god of the
- 9:44gaps argument. It's been around forever.
- 9:48>> So in fact people who want to make
- 9:49arguments
- 9:50>> and by wait and I don't I don't even
- 9:52mind I don't even care if someone wants
- 9:56to say you don't understand that God did
- 9:59it. That doesn't even bother me. What
- 10:01would bother me is if you were so
- 10:04content in that answer
- 10:06that you no longer had curiosity to
- 10:09learn how it happened. If the day you
- 10:11stopped looking because you're content
- 10:13God did it, I don't need you in the lab.
- 10:15You're useless on the frontier of
- 10:18understanding the nature of the world.
- 10:20>> Speaking of Earth, how do you feel about
- 10:21the people that think it's only 6,000
- 10:23years old?
- 10:24>> Uh it's they they if they think that,
- 10:26they think that because that is mandated
- 10:29by their religious philosophy.
- 10:30>> Exactly. uh okay you know I mean just
- 10:34keep it out of the science classroom
- 10:35that that's all I I don't try to confuse
- 10:38that with doing science
- 10:40>> science we have learned science has
- 10:42completely transformed our culture it's
- 10:43doubled our life expectancy it has
- 10:46brought comfort and uh health and
- 10:48well-being and and not only science but
- 10:50the fruits of science the technological
- 10:52fruits of science and of course you need
- 10:54to be good shepherds of this power
- 10:56because in the wrong hands it could be
- 10:59used for evil right this is the great
- 11:01sort of dichomy of great the great of
- 11:04unlocking the secrets of nature.
- 11:06>> So, uh so I don't I'm not going to fight
- 11:09them to tell them the universe is not
- 11:12your way.
- 11:12>> No, no, no, no. My just the science
- 11:14classroom.
- 11:15>> No, no. And and and if you want to put
- 11:17it in a science classroom, understand
- 11:19the ramifications.
- 11:20>> Your country will go bankrupt because
- 11:23you will no longer be in a position to
- 11:25forge the economies of tomorrow that
- 11:27will require uh science and
- 11:29technological innovation. And at least
- 11:30the next question cuz a few people on
- 11:32the lines are asking, "Do you believe in
- 11:33God?" I I'm I'm not convinced if if here
- 11:37here's the thing. If every every time I
- 11:39talk about God with someone who's a
- 11:41believer, God is is is all powerful and
- 11:45all knowing and and and all good, right?
- 11:47The the good is a big part of this.
- 11:50>> And then I look at all the ways earth
- 11:53wants to kill us,
- 11:56>> strike us.
- 11:56>> You know, a tsunami takes out a quarter
- 11:58million people. hurricanes, earthquakes,
- 12:00tornadoes, floods, and and I add all of
- 12:04that up. Either
- 12:08the God is not all powerful
- 12:11or is not all good. But it can't really
- 12:14be both given all the ways the universe
- 12:18wants to kill us. And and and and if
- 12:21Earth is not finished killing you,
- 12:23there's the asteroid that could come in.
- 12:25an asteroid rendered 70% of all life
- 12:29forms extinct back in that's the famous
- 12:32one in 65 million years ago that took
- 12:34out the dinosaurs. So there's so many
- 12:37ways to die not at the hands of someone
- 12:39else who has free will that I I don't
- 12:42know what what is the nature of the god
- 12:45that you're talking about.
- 12:46>> I I I got to like try to like use your
- 12:49logic back at you. But don't we define
- 12:51what what is good and what is bad? So we
- 12:53see a tsunami wipe out a whole bunch of
- 12:55people and we're as human beings going,
- 12:58"Wow, that's bad." Because we define
- 13:00what bad is maybe in God's brain, eyes,
- 13:03whatever the hell that that's not bad.
- 13:05>> Well, but except you defined what God
- 13:07is.
- 13:07>> Oh boy.
- 13:09>> Wow.
- 13:09>> Now you So why why do you have the power
- 13:12to define who and what God is
- 13:14>> but not have the power to define what
- 13:16good is?
- 13:16>> Yeah. My point is we just don't know it
- 13:18all. Not even close.
- 13:20>> Oh, sure. So, so therefore, uh, if
- 13:23you're going to say God actually is good
- 13:26and a quarter million people dying from
- 13:28an earthquake and a tsunami and and
- 13:30other natural disasters,
- 13:32>> um, and God presumably has control over
- 13:34that and God is good, then you have to
- 13:37then say God works in mysterious ways,
- 13:39right? That's that. But people only say
- 13:42that when their understanding of God
- 13:45fails them,
- 13:46>> when it's something bad.
- 13:48>> No, no. They can't understand it. They
- 13:49told God works it in mysterious ways,
- 13:51but somehow in these other ways you did
- 13:53understand him,
- 13:54>> right?
- 13:54>> How are you saying, well, this is the
- 13:56this is the handywork of God. This
- 13:58you're doing God's work. God wants you
- 14:00to do this. Somehow you know God's
- 14:01motives every other way. When but but
- 14:04when a quarter million people get wiped
- 14:05out, God works in mysterious ways. Why
- 14:08do you why why do you even claim to have
- 14:12access to God's mind in some context and
- 14:15not others? Just admit you have no clue.
- 14:18and get on with life. That's how I look
- 14:20at it.
- 14:20>> We just don't have a a clue when it
- 14:22comes down to it.
- 14:23>> Well, I'd like to think that preserving
- 14:25health and longevity, that is a nice
- 14:28operational definition of something
- 14:30that's good,
- 14:30>> right?
- 14:31>> How can you argue why how can you debate
- 14:33something that keeps you alive and
- 14:35healthy? That's got to be a something
- 14:38that's good. I I can't I'm I'm I refuse
- 14:40to allow someone to say, "I'm going to
- 14:43give you cancer, birth defects, and
- 14:45shorten your life and somehow call that
- 14:48good." I I I'm not going there.
- 14:49>> I hear you. I'm not going there.
- 14:52>> In the vast darkness of the cosmos,
- 14:54humanity once looked up and saw mystery.
- 14:56Lightning, eclipses, plagues, the birth
- 14:58of life itself, all seemed like the
- 15:00signature of gods. When we didn't know,
- 15:03we invented answers. This is where
- 15:05religion began. as our first attempt to
- 15:07explain what we could not understand.
- 15:09But there's a pattern. Every time
- 15:10science uncovers the mechanism behind a
- 15:12once mysterious phenomenon, the space
- 15:14where we placed God shrinks. This is
- 15:17what we call the god of the gaps.
- 15:19Wherever our knowledge has holes, some
- 15:21insert the divine as a placeholder. But
- 15:23with each discovery, those gaps close
- 15:25one by one. Thunder is no longer the
- 15:28voice of Zeus. Disease is no longer the
- 15:30punishment of an angry deity. The earth
- 15:32is not the center of the universe and
- 15:34never was. Science does not kill wonder.
- 15:36It expands it. It replaces fear with
- 15:38curiosity, dogma with evidence, faith
- 15:40with understanding. Religion may offer
- 15:43comfort, but science offers answers.
- 15:45Answers that work. Answers we can test,
- 15:47build upon, and use to shape the future.
- 15:50The more we know, the less room there is
- 15:52for gods. And perhaps that is the most
- 15:54profound revelation of all that the
- 15:56universe is not shaped for us but that
- 15:58we have the power to understand it
- 15:59anyway.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Neil deGrasse Tyson BEST Arguments Against God by Space Cay, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,796 words across 416 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.