LO_Angelina Kallita Caumen_Stella Gracia School_Makassar — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:01Push and pull in centers to gorge
- 0:02audience fame for their own favorite
- 0:04athletes or cursing in another rival
- 0:05league is exactly what makes sports
- 0:07alive in the first place. What is debate
- 0:09is bad is discussing the trend of how we
- 0:11cheered athletes and sports on a broad
- 0:13manner. That's the same. What is hate
- 0:15watching? We think hate watching is the
- 0:17dislike and rivalry. We think team
- 0:19government's stance is quite correct on
- 0:21hate watching. But we'd like to stress
- 0:23it is on a speech not the act of
- 0:25bullying or physically harming on other
- 0:27athletes themselves. We think it comes
- 0:30not only from the enjoyment of watching
- 0:31someone fail, but also from the
- 0:33legitimate expression that you want to
- 0:35see your own athletes literally succeed
- 0:37within other people. This is also how we
- 0:39try to increase on the competitiveness
- 0:41and also the rivalry within sports
- 0:43communities. The kind of enjoyment that
- 0:44we have. That is to say, notice this is
- 0:47a narrative motion. We're going to prove
- 0:49the rise of hate watching does not harm
- 0:50that much. As long as people enjoy doing
- 0:52this and there's no extreme harms in
- 0:55their checks and balances, we think it's
- 0:57quite legitimate. Why don't check and
- 0:59bounces which defeats the government's
- 1:00own claim on toxic culture and also why
- 1:02athletes are vulnerable in the first
- 1:03place. Three things. First, the sports
- 1:05community is full of diverse amounts of
- 1:07people. Moderate fans will try to call
- 1:09it an extreme fans who try to bully
- 1:12other people or other athletes and other
- 1:14leagues. That is to say, there's checks
- 1:15and balances. Second, fans who are
- 1:17indeed professional, who already have a
- 1:20extreme control within the sports
- 1:22community, who try to endorse or try to
- 1:24buy merchandise within their own um
- 1:26athletes who do shape on a community's
- 1:28own perceptions do not want to their own
- 1:31athletes reputation to be ruined within
- 1:33other leagues. The very case is because
- 1:35they realize the harms that it causes to
- 1:37their own athletes, the punishment that
- 1:39their athletes will also face. But third
- 1:41of all, agencies already protect
- 1:43athletes from these kinds of hate
- 1:45comments. Athletes also already know how
- 1:48to cope with people who spread on these
- 1:50hate comments against them. So we think
- 1:52the most vulnerable people here are the
- 1:53people who are never able to have the
- 1:56chance to literally express their own
- 1:59hate speech in legitimate ways. These
- 2:01are the people that teen government is
- 2:03going to offhand try to lock out from
- 2:06the sports community.
- 2:08>> [snorts]
- 2:08>> First argument that the thesis of this
- 2:11argument says it is within the people's
- 2:13own preferences to actively express
- 2:15their dislikes or likes within the
- 2:17sports community in it of itself. Why do
- 2:19we not root for someone we actually
- 2:22like? We think that sometimes we hate
- 2:24that other opposition team in
- 2:25semi-finals simply because we are losing
- 2:28and they are winning. We think it's
- 2:29quite legitimate itself because it is in
- 2:31the forms of your own emotions.
- 2:33Sometimes the leisure of hate speech is
- 2:36quite legitimate in two ways. First, it
- 2:39comes from competition because it comes
- 2:41in sports where you literally try to
- 2:43compete with other athletes. Not only in
- 2:45terms of your own athletes ability but
- 2:47also in your athletes ability to endorse
- 2:49and market to other fans. Fans are quite
- 2:51dedicated to one athlete. They try to
- 2:53have hate speech to one another league
- 2:56because in is in a way to show
- 2:58themselves the way they try to support
- 2:59their own athletes and also the way they
- 3:01try to increase the competitiveness
- 3:03within other leagues to also engage
- 3:05within their community. But second of
- 3:06all what I want to stress on the
- 3:09frustration of sports itself. Sometimes
- 3:11people use this kind of hate watching as
- 3:14a coping mechanism. Some people may not
- 3:16learn how to be politable or how to be
- 3:19polite. That's to say these are the
- 3:20people that team government is literally
- 3:23locking out. These are people who come
- 3:24from different backgrounds. Perhaps
- 3:26these people who are quite poor. These
- 3:28people who are never able to literally
- 3:30express themselves in a polite way in
- 3:33ways that they never they will never be
- 3:35able to in team government. That's to
- 3:37say we try to respect that. We try to
- 3:39platform every single different
- 3:40background in the sports community in
- 3:43our side of the house. The principle
- 3:45that we're running in this debate is
- 3:46direct harm. When do we think that this
- 3:50kind of action is too extreme or too
- 3:51wrong? People get to freely do whatever
- 3:53they want so long as does not
- 3:55continuously harm or physically harm
- 3:58other people. So when you try to throw
- 3:59stones to other athletes, we think that
- 4:01already crosses a line especially during
- 4:03their own tournament where they try to
- 4:04be much more competitive. What we trying
- 4:07to engage here is a competitiveness, the
- 4:09ability of people to engage with one
- 4:11another and try to comment with one
- 4:12another, try to engage and just simply
- 4:14have fun in sports people. We think that
- 4:16that is what we trying to run on. What
- 4:18gives the government team the right to
- 4:20judge other people to express
- 4:21themselves? This is the question that I
- 4:23want to ask to against their own team.
- 4:25So why do we think expression is
- 4:27important? We think it's important in
- 4:28two things. First expression literally
- 4:30lets people to have different kinds of
- 4:33expressing their own ways and the
- 4:35variety of ways of how we feel because
- 4:37the different ways of how we try to
- 4:38support these kinds of sports is quite
- 4:40subjective. We try to um welcome every
- 4:43single people who do these things in
- 4:45different ways. Second of all,
- 4:46suppressing expression leads to a
- 4:48simmering frustration. When people are
- 4:50unable to literally lash out, they
- 4:52result which will break when they're
- 4:55unable to control it. That's to say
- 4:56extreme viewers who are already extreme
- 4:58in the status quo are likely to double
- 5:00down when they are not even given a
- 5:02place in the first place to literally
- 5:04express their own self. We think while
- 5:07their own incidents like physically
- 5:08harming other athletes may happen less
- 5:10in team government site, we think the
- 5:12severity like the physical harm
- 5:14literally is going to be much more
- 5:16severe in their side of the house
- 5:17because they're suppressing their own
- 5:18hate within other leagues and other
- 5:21athletes. Even if that were not true,
- 5:22I'm going to explain the kinds of
- 5:24comparative and the incentives that team
- 5:26government literally failed to express
- 5:28in their side of the house. So within
- 5:30the comparative in team government is a
- 5:32world where people incapable of
- 5:34literally hate. What is not a world
- 5:36where people incapable of hate but what
- 5:38stops them from literally hate watching.
- 5:41It's a world where people feel are being
- 5:43continuously censored or being
- 5:44continuously judged or feel like they
- 5:46can't able to express themsel especially
- 5:48in the digital community. We think that
- 5:50in a lot of these cases people are going
- 5:52to lash out more. People are unable to
- 5:55find a place where they're able to
- 5:57express themselves quite legitimately
- 5:58and feel like they belong to a community
- 6:00within these sports leagues. That is to
- 6:02say, team government tries to eliminate
- 6:05every single kind of hate watching and
- 6:07tries to increasingly moderate that kind
- 6:09of hate watching. In team opposition,
- 6:11you don't need to sacrifice good speech
- 6:13for a complete hate speech because you
- 6:15have both an outside who try to platform
- 6:18on every single thing. I'm going to
- 6:20rebut on a few of their own comments.
- 6:21They said how their own rivalry is a
- 6:24necessity that sometimes this kind of
- 6:27rivalry is welcome but only as a
- 6:29necessity. We think that already
- 6:31eliminates the own meaning of sports
- 6:33community themselves because sports
- 6:34communities are fundamentally
- 6:36competitive. It's the one that increases
- 6:38the feel for other people to engage and
- 6:40literally just have fun within the
- 6:42sports to have the freedom to express
- 6:44your own self. They literally limit that
- 6:46in every single way. just see on every
- 6:48single analysis of our own arguments.
- 6:51But also secondly, second secondly, we
- 6:53think there's no a priority rational to
- 6:55be polite in sports or literally to be
- 6:58polite in everything because human
- 6:59beings are fundamentally quite
- 7:01emotional, right? within that in sports
- 7:03especially the quite competitiveness
- 7:05when I see someone that I literally hate
- 7:08or perhaps an athlete that I don't like
- 7:10I can to have I am quite legitimate to
- 7:13have hate watching because we think it's
- 7:15quite legitimate for you to express your
- 7:17own self and clear on what comparative
- 7:20team government is trying to offer they
- 7:22don't really have a comparative at all
- 7:24we think in our side of the house people
- 7:26feel much more comfortable to literally
- 7:28share or express their own opinions to
- 7:31literally just to have fun in the sports
- 7:34communities. That's to say, we try to
- 7:36platform on every single side where
- 7:38people people try uh to promote more on
- 7:41hate speech or perhaps try to be
- 7:43politely critiquing on other athletes
- 7:45who promote every single thing. That's
- 7:47to say, how do you weigh this? Even if
- 7:49team government manages to concede on
- 7:51the likelihood that yes perhaps this
- 7:53kind of hate speech hate watching is
- 7:55going to be quite extreme. We will tell
- 7:58you that at least in our side of the
- 7:59house we get to we get to give the
- 8:02chance for people to express themselves
- 8:03as individuals the ability for them to
- 8:05choose on choice because we think that
- 8:08that is the most important thing
- 8:09especially in a competitive community
- 8:11where all of you want to have fun. We're
- 8:13very proud to propose
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of LO_Angelina Kallita Caumen_Stella Gracia School_Makassar by ✨ARTIE✨, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 1,628 words across 243 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.