YouTube2Text

lance07.mov — Transcript

by TheDosPelotas · 2,336 words · 348 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00think that's the best assumption well uh
  2. 0:03is it your testimony that you didn't
  3. 0:04know in connection with your
  4. 0:05participation in the 99 and 2000 to Def
  5. 0:08France races that there was no test
  6. 0:11being administered for the presence of
  7. 0:13epo well if the question is did I read a
  8. 0:17public announcement that the OT test is
  9. 0:19ready to go and will be implemented in
  10. 0:2099 or 2000 that didn't they didn't say
  11. 0:24that so okay I'm not trying to apply
  12. 0:27anything by this I'm just trying to find
  13. 0:28out this your State of Mind perspective
  14. 0:30to what she knows being tested for
  15. 0:31that's all um well what's yeah you know
  16. 0:34I think it would be fair to say that in
  17. 0:362000 for example they didn't have the
  18. 0:39EPO test
  19. 0:40perfected so
  20. 0:42perhaps athletes could have taken EPO
  21. 0:46and gotten away with
  22. 0:48it what was great for
  23. 0:51us was that we were formerly
  24. 0:53investigated in France and all of our
  25. 0:54samples were
  26. 0:56seized at a time when you could have
  27. 0:59taken even because they didn't have the
  28. 1:00test ready but all of the samples were
  29. 1:03seized and tested with this method and
  30. 1:06were clean okay what what samples would
  31. 1:09these have been from the 2000 tour okay
  32. 1:12when were They seized I don't know
  33. 1:14whenever the judge wanted them okay
  34. 1:17which we again override overrode the
  35. 1:19uci's decision and said no give them
  36. 1:22nothing to
  37. 1:23hide okay where were the samples
  38. 1:26maintained at the time they were I have
  39. 1:27no
  40. 1:28idea okay in
  41. 1:30Europe do you know where could be more
  42. 1:32specific do you know who maintained them
  43. 1:35no
  44. 1:36idea do you know if there's any um of
  45. 1:40those samples
  46. 1:42left we know Herman hasn't eaten them
  47. 1:45sure not this morning anyway God
  48. 1:49Almighty hope that's on the record that
  49. 1:51would definitely be on if I if I heard
  50. 1:53it that mic heard itead
  51. 2:00no I I don't I don't know stop giving
  52. 2:02the witness signals through through
  53. 2:04bodily
  54. 2:05functions I don't know if if uh if there
  55. 2:08I have no idea I mean do you know if
  56. 2:10there's anything left from those samples
  57. 2:11for examp I have no idea okay um what
  58. 2:14about the 99 samples um that were
  59. 2:17reported in the L story uh I'm going to
  60. 2:19ask you some questions about that first
  61. 2:22uh obviously you've had an opportunity
  62. 2:23to review the story and the writing that
  63. 2:26was I read the story but well you you
  64. 2:29certainly had translated for you haven't
  65. 2:30you the entire story yeah no I mean
  66. 2:36you you surely didn't appear on TV and
  67. 2:38talk about it and never actually read
  68. 2:39the whole thing of course okay
  69. 2:44um all right well fair
  70. 2:47enough um do you know whether or not the
  71. 2:50samples which have been identified as
  72. 2:52yours mhm are in fact yours I have no
  73. 2:56idea I I I I can only believe that they
  74. 3:00either are not mine or have been
  75. 3:02manipulated because when I pissed in the
  76. 3:05bottle as I told you earlier having
  77. 3:07never taken performance Hing drugs when
  78. 3:09I pissed in the bottle there was not EO
  79. 3:10in that piss or
  80. 3:13urine and as the article
  81. 3:16said the accused cannot defend
  82. 3:20himself so I have a clear conscience
  83. 3:22going on TV without reading the article
  84. 3:25okay because the first paragraph says oh
  85. 3:27by the way he cannot defend himself
  86. 3:33well I guess there's a third possibility
  87. 3:34which is the test is just wrong
  88. 3:36right I'm not a scientist I don't know I
  89. 3:39know that without uh proper procedure
  90. 3:42and protocol
  91. 3:43that you cannot defend yourself okay but
  92. 3:47have you actually looked to see whether
  93. 3:48or not the samples that were identified
  94. 3:50as yours are in fact not yours I don't
  95. 3:52mean the actual urine in it but that the
  96. 3:55the the match between the numbers match
  97. 3:58up with I have not loved do you know if
  98. 4:01anyone's investigating that on your I
  99. 4:05think that the UCI has an independent
  100. 4:08investigation going on perhaps wada has
  101. 4:10one going
  102. 4:11on have you had any contact with anyone
  103. 4:14at wada regarding their investigation if
  104. 4:16any no in the beginning we contacted
  105. 4:18dick pound what did he
  106. 4:20say uh he
  107. 4:23said
  108. 4:26uh this this was quite frankly one of
  109. 4:29the most
  110. 4:30incredible conversations I've ever heard
  111. 4:32but he said listen I don't care if
  112. 4:35proper procedure was followed all that I
  113. 4:37care is that you're
  114. 4:40positive and he went on to say that
  115. 4:43whoever invented the B sample I don't
  116. 4:46what they think this is [ __ ] nobody
  117. 4:47needs the B
  118. 4:49sample this is the man
  119. 4:52who's supposedly pioneered the water
  120. 4:55coat and trumped it all over the world
  121. 4:59you know I said that that's the Saving
  122. 5:01Grace to sport we said well can we just
  123. 5:03read over the water code and he said
  124. 5:04well hang on let me get let me pull it
  125. 5:06up so he had to go to his computer and
  126. 5:09we finally cut him off so don't worry
  127. 5:10about it I think we
  128. 5:12understand that's about the only thing
  129. 5:15on conversation I mean do you do you
  130. 5:17view dick pound as a individual not
  131. 5:20friendly towards
  132. 5:23yourself I don't think Dick's friendly
  133. 5:26to towards most athletes I mean I'm sure
  134. 5:28we all read the NHL comments last week
  135. 5:31yeah um what about UCI do you view the
  136. 5:34the UCI is impartial in these
  137. 5:36Affairs oh yeah
  138. 5:38absolutely um it's been reported neutral
  139. 5:41you mean neutral that's what I mean
  140. 5:42neutral not favoring you or anyone or
  141. 5:44not against you or any right um do you
  142. 5:48think wada has an agenda though with
  143. 5:50respect to you for example no
  144. 5:52I you know I think if you read my open
  145. 5:56letter to Dick pound some time ago it
  146. 5:59wouldn't be hard hard to imagine that
  147. 6:00dick wasn't very happy about
  148. 6:02that um is it is it even possible for
  149. 6:05I'm not going to use you but let's say
  150. 6:07an athlete who who won the Tour to
  151. 6:10France in
  152. 6:1197 uh and let's say they used the 97
  153. 6:15samples instead of the 99 and determined
  154. 6:17from a from an a sample that that
  155. 6:19athlete tested positive for a band
  156. 6:21substance to your knowledge is it
  157. 6:23possible to to withdraw or vacate that
  158. 6:27individual's championship in the toural
  159. 6:29resp they use the a sample or they use
  160. 6:32the B sample let's just say they use the
  161. 6:33a sample and they had the B sample no
  162. 6:36same circumstances I'm just using a
  163. 6:38different athlet I it to your knowledge
  164. 6:40is it possible under tour to France's
  165. 6:41rules to to strip a
  166. 6:44title years after it takes place without
  167. 6:47a confirmation sample correct
  168. 6:49no if there is a confirmation sample
  169. 6:52that's listen that's the system that's
  170. 6:53been in place since the since the
  171. 6:55beginning
  172. 6:56of the doping fight so they've changed
  173. 7:00the rules all of a
  174. 7:02sudden uh if there is a confirmation uh
  175. 7:05of an athlete using a ban substance who
  176. 7:07is a champion uh do you know if there's
  177. 7:10a procedure mechanism in place under the
  178. 7:12tour to France rules to to vacate that
  179. 7:14person's title I have no idea
  180. 7:20okay now um we were talking about W and
  181. 7:24UCI you have made a a a contribution or
  182. 7:28donation to The UCI have you not I have
  183. 7:31yeah would you know when that was
  184. 7:33made some years ago I don't recall
  185. 7:36exactly uh 2000 for
  186. 7:40example I don't
  187. 7:43know was it uh uh was there anything
  188. 7:46that occasioned that that you recall
  189. 7:48like I'm doing it because of X or Y or Z
  190. 7:51I'm doing it to to fund the fight
  191. 7:54against
  192. 7:56doing and what what made you
  193. 8:00what triggered that was there any
  194. 8:01particular
  195. 8:03event the only event or the only uh idea
  196. 8:07is that I'm in support of that
  197. 8:10b just like I've done on other occasions
  198. 8:13why
  199. 8:14UCI why give the money to UC because
  200. 8:17they're our governing body okay how much
  201. 8:19did you give uh I think
  202. 8:2425,000 you say you think do you yeah I'd
  203. 8:27say I think because I'm not 100% sure
  204. 8:29would it be within a range of that
  205. 8:31though if you're I mean it wouldn't be
  206. 8:33like 200,000 or 150,000 no I mean it
  207. 8:36could be 30 or 40 or could be 20 is what
  208. 8:39I'm
  209. 8:40asking it could be I don't think it's
  210. 8:42that but I think it's no more than 30
  211. 8:46was it by personal check I don't
  212. 8:49remember uh did you tell UCI you were
  213. 8:51going to make it before you
  214. 8:54did
  215. 8:56um I don't recall but but I don't think
  216. 9:00so I don't
  217. 9:04know you gave
  218. 9:06$25,000 or approximately $25,000 to the
  219. 9:09UCI but you don't remember if you told
  220. 9:11them beforehand you're sending them a
  221. 9:13check I don't recall had you ever given
  222. 9:16any money to UCI before no have you ever
  223. 9:18given any money since um I have pledged
  224. 9:22money since but I I don't think I've
  225. 9:23done it yet when is your pledge money I
  226. 9:26don't remember between now and then
  227. 9:30no I meant when did you make the
  228. 9:32pledge between now and then I don't
  229. 9:34recall exactly well between now and then
  230. 9:36meaning between the time you gave him
  231. 9:37the
  232. 9:3925 now and then which I guess would be
  233. 9:42tomorrow um okay uh so still a fight I
  234. 9:46believe in okay so make the donation I'm
  235. 9:48not attacking your the fight I'm asking
  236. 9:51and if you have a different suggestion
  237. 9:52on where to donate the money well is
  238. 9:55there any other organization that that
  239. 9:56is involved in anti-doping
  240. 9:59well you have a lot of organizations W
  241. 10:01usada usoc USA cycling pick all those so
  242. 10:05there were other I mean there are there
  243. 10:06at least other organizations you get a
  244. 10:07pick yeah okay what uh do you know what
  245. 10:11UCI did with the money I don't know who
  246. 10:13did you give the money
  247. 10:15to well if you sent a check or a wire I
  248. 10:18don't know who received it but but I
  249. 10:20mean like is it literally like one day
  250. 10:23the UCI guy comes in opens up the mail
  251. 10:25there's a check from you for $25,000 I I
  252. 10:27I don't know I wasn't in the mail room
  253. 10:28okay but did did you let anyone know
  254. 10:30this is coming I told you I don't
  255. 10:33remember okay uh have you spoken to
  256. 10:35anyone at UCI regarding your donation uh
  257. 10:39yeah who I have spoken to Alan
  258. 10:43room uh and
  259. 10:48buan perhaps others you know what
  260. 10:51they've done with the money I just told
  261. 10:54you I don't know okay like they didn't
  262. 10:56buy some specific equipment or something
  263. 10:57with it that you're aware of was an ear
  264. 11:00Mark which part of I don't know do you
  265. 11:02not understand so you have no idea why
  266. 11:04you gave $25,000 to UCI at all and you
  267. 11:07don't even know if you called anyone
  268. 11:08before my question finish your question
  269. 11:11have no idea who who you called and just
  270. 11:13you just sent a check for $25,000 to the
  271. 11:16UCI you can't remember why you did it or
  272. 11:17who you talked to or what it was for you
  273. 11:19asked me again what have they done with
  274. 11:22the money and I said I don't know okay
  275. 11:24but you've spoken to two people have
  276. 11:26they discussed with you what they plan
  277. 11:27on doing with the funds in any way or
  278. 11:29what they hope to do with the fund not
  279. 11:30that I
  280. 11:36recall when did you did you ever tell
  281. 11:40the public that you had made that
  282. 11:42donation
  283. 11:45um H buan told them at some point and I
  284. 11:49confirmed
  285. 11:52that was there a reason why you didn't
  286. 11:54publicly announce your donation to UCI
  287. 11:58the same reason that I don't my fight
  288. 12:01against doping is not a public
  289. 12:03fight it's the same reason that before
  290. 12:06the 2003 tour to France which was fairly
  291. 12:08well publicized I sent a private
  292. 12:12email to Mr vergan Mr shenberg Mr
  293. 12:15LeBlanc Daniel Bal everybody involved in
  294. 12:18the tour and cycling he said we have to
  295. 12:20keep up this fight which then became
  296. 12:23public a public email after Danielle
  297. 12:24ball put it in his
  298. 12:26book personally
  299. 12:30now this is going this is going to shock
  300. 12:34you but my style is different than David
  301. 12:38walshes um my Approach has been more of
  302. 12:41an internal one to support clean racing
  303. 12:44to support clean
  304. 12:46sport my idea of the best tactic is not
  305. 12:50to slander and defam everybody and bite
  306. 12:52the hand that feeds you and piss in the
  307. 12:56suit but my fight and my commitment has
  308. 12:59always been
  309. 13:02there were were you concerned at all
  310. 13:05when you made your contribution to the
  311. 13:06UCI that uh other cyclists or members of
  312. 13:10the the cycling public might take it the
  313. 13:12wrong
  314. 13:14way no are you aware of any other
  315. 13:17professional cyclist who's given money
  316. 13:18to UCI I don't know I'm not
  317. 13:23aware personally I think there should be
  318. 13:25I think I think everybody should
  319. 13:27contribute to the fund how does UCI get
  320. 13:29money do you
  321. 13:31know I have no
  322. 13:34idea I honestly I don't
  323. 13:37know that part of I don't know I
  324. 13:39understood believe
  325. 13:41me
  326. 13:50um there's uh been allegations regarding
  327. 13:54what has been alleged to be a positive
  328. 13:57drug test by you um for a steroid or
  329. 14:02cortisone in connection with the wait a
  330. 14:05steroid or cortisone cortisone I'm sorry
  331. 14:07I apologize let because they're
  332. 14:09different I understand I understand
  333. 14:11believe me um one is actually anabolic
  334. 14:14and one is actually catabolic okay okay
  335. 14:16I'm I'm aware of that
  336. 14:20um well let me ask connection with the
  337. 14:23testing done for the tour to France does
  338. 14:24UCI supervise and oversee that
  339. 14:30if you know I don't know I mean uh when
  340. 14:33you step into the RV or the the the room
  341. 14:37where you give the urine sample there is
  342. 14:39a representative from the UCI obviously
  343. 14:42and a representative
  344. 14:45from perhaps the French Ministry of
  345. 14:47sport or somewhere I so there's a
  346. 14:49representative
  347. 14:51there um how how much notification are
  348. 14:56you given for testing

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of lance07.mov by TheDosPelotas, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,336 words across 348 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.