Jeffrey Sachs: Disastrous NATO Summit: Toward Nuclear War with Russia — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Welcome back. We have the great pleasure
- 0:01of being joined today by Professor
- 0:03Jeffrey Saxs. So, thank you very much
- 0:05for joining in.
- 0:07>> Of course. Great. Always great to be
- 0:08with you, Glenn. Thank you.
- 0:10>> So, the NATO summit in Anchor uh is over
- 0:14now and um well, it's been let's say
- 0:17interesting that is uh the militarism uh
- 0:20and also the hostility against NATO's
- 0:22enemies was seemingly dialed up and even
- 0:25within NATO there were great tensions.
- 0:28Trump, which is also known as Mark Rut's
- 0:32daddy, turned out to be quite a deadbeat
- 0:34dad. He's very abusive against his uh
- 0:37well so-called allies in Europe. Uh
- 0:40again, quite incredible to watch. Uh I
- 0:42want to get your take though. What was
- 0:44what did you take away from this uh NATO
- 0:47summit?
- 0:49I think basically the NATO
- 0:52alliance as it were is
- 0:56mostly in disarray. This is uh not a a
- 1:01serious group. Uh not seriously
- 1:05strategizing.
- 1:07It was two days of Trumpisms. Uh he's
- 1:11absolutely mentally uh unstable. It's we
- 1:16can normalize it. We can laugh about it.
- 1:19We can uh say that it's a a tactic.
- 1:24He's a he's really uh something uh awful
- 1:29and everyone plays along with it. So you
- 1:32watch two days that are quite bizarre.
- 1:34Uh he says that Spain is awful. We
- 1:38should cut off all trade with Spain.
- 1:40Spain's response is we have very nice
- 1:43relations with the United States. All is
- 1:45well. We had a charming chat. Uh the
- 1:48United States president says
- 1:51basically Greenland needs to be ours.
- 1:54Okay, that's fine. Uh
- 1:58uh no, it won't be.
- 2:01This is not really an alliance right
- 2:03now. And these are not meetings of
- 2:05serious people. I'm sorry to say. Of
- 2:10course, a lot of the talk was about
- 2:14military spending, and it's a club to
- 2:17encourage everybody to spend more,
- 2:19especially on US weaponry uh and to talk
- 2:23about war.
- 2:25But there used to be a time when uh
- 2:28great issues were discussed in a serious
- 2:30way. Uh and that time is long over. The
- 2:36United States is uh basically
- 2:39uh without leadership. It flails around.
- 2:44Trump, as I said, is
- 2:48is obviously the emperor without
- 2:50clothes. Uh and um
- 2:55I would say that it this is just bizarre
- 2:58life. Every day is something bizarre.
- 3:02And that's maybe Trump's survival
- 3:04tactic. Every day crowds out the day
- 3:07before. Uh and now we're on to the
- 3:11renewed uh fighting in uh with Iran. Uh
- 3:17and the the NATO meeting uh will soon be
- 3:22forgotten. That's that's my basic take.
- 3:25But it's not harmless. It's uh a whole
- 3:29western world that is pretty much a
- 3:32drift without strategy, quite nasty, uh
- 3:37engaged in a lot of the deadly war. Uh
- 3:41without anyone uh seemingly aware of the
- 3:45real risks of all of this, uh these
- 3:49people distinguish themselves by and
- 3:51large as being fools.
- 3:53>> Yeah. for the US president refers to the
- 3:56Iranian negotiators as scum. It's quite
- 3:59extraordinary that this has become the
- 4:02the new normal, if you will. But als but
- 4:05also the rhetoric against Yeah. Sorry.
- 4:06Go ahead.
- 4:07>> I was just going to say that the fact
- 4:09that this is normalized
- 4:11that we shrug and well that's just Trump
- 4:17is not an adequate response to this. We
- 4:22are in hot wars. They're extremely
- 4:25dangerous. People are being killed in
- 4:28large numbers. Life is not a joke, but
- 4:32it's treated as a shrug or a joke, and
- 4:36it is not. So, it's on the one side
- 4:40quite serious, but the serious point is
- 4:44that nothing serious is actually
- 4:46discussed by these people. Nothing
- 4:49honest, nothing serious. Uh and uh that
- 4:52is shocking in a world at war.
- 4:57>> Yeah. And uh well the European leaders
- 4:59they continue to call for deeper strikes
- 5:02into Russia with well their own weapons
- 5:05based on their own intelligence and
- 5:06targeting. And the the objective is
- 5:09apparently to force the Russians to the
- 5:12negotiation table. But this is by
- 5:14European leaders who still after 4 and a
- 5:16half years still boycott the diplomacy.
- 5:19So, it is it's quite strange and no one
- 5:22seemingly can call them out because
- 5:24nobody wants to be seen as being, you
- 5:26know, pro-Russian by referring to
- 5:28objective reality. But now we see the
- 5:30American side as well. Marco Rubio
- 5:32argued that um attacking Russia will
- 5:35help to advance peace. Trump made a
- 5:37casual reference to a s um imposing a
- 5:41nofly zone and also of course they will
- 5:43now allow uh well the licensing of um
- 5:47Patriot missiles to be manufactured in
- 5:49Ukraine.
- 5:51Is the US now getting into this war
- 5:54again or deeper into this war? Because
- 5:56uh this is very different than the
- 5:58rhetoric we saw from Trump after his uh
- 6:01well taking over power uh the second
- 6:03time.
- 6:05Trump campaigned
- 6:07on the basis of the end of these useless
- 6:10wars. But the American wars are driven
- 6:15by the militaryindustrial
- 6:17digital complex. I think it's important
- 6:20to add digital now because uh big tech
- 6:24is absolutely a party and a profit
- 6:28center of these wars. And um when Trump
- 6:33uh would take any kind of move to uh
- 6:38find a diplomatic uh solution uh most of
- 6:44the US political class, most of
- 6:46Washington uh in both houses of Congress
- 6:50uh and throughout the uh the Pentagon,
- 6:53maybe not the generals so much, but uh
- 6:56uh a lot of former generals who are now
- 7:00in the uh military contracting uh
- 7:04companies uh they strongly objected and
- 7:07then Trump would change course because
- 7:09he's a a weak and bullish man to to
- 7:12begin with and he does not have a
- 7:15strategy
- 7:18and he does not understand
- 7:21the job that he has almost at all. So, I
- 7:25would say Glenn that uh you could say
- 7:28that there was a a change of rhetoric
- 7:31because Trump thought it's just fine. Uh
- 7:35that the war is escalating. Yes, Trump
- 7:39said whether it's meaningful or not that
- 7:42uh
- 7:44Ukraine will be able to uh produce
- 7:48Patriot missile systems and so forth.
- 7:53But the truth is that rhetoric never
- 7:55went away in Washington. Uh Trump seemed
- 7:59to be
- 8:02trying to chart a slightly different
- 8:06course, but it was always ineffectual.
- 8:09It it was always bouncing around back to
- 8:12sanctions and deadlines and uh and
- 8:15threats to Russia. So this latest round
- 8:19is not some kind of decisive turn of US
- 8:24policy. Basically
- 8:28the US government and I would say uh the
- 8:31governments of the major countries are
- 8:33driven by a
- 8:37profit center war machine. Uh this is
- 8:43the dominant part of US politics. Uh, it
- 8:46would take a strong president with a
- 8:49clear vision and a capacity to talk to
- 8:54the American people other than in
- 8:58idiotic posts on True Social to be able
- 9:01to make a change because the president
- 9:05would have to talk over this powerful
- 9:07lobby. Trump can't do that. He doesn't
- 9:11have much interest in doing it. Silicon
- 9:14Valley uh especially led by the likes of
- 9:18Palunteer, but almost all of big tech
- 9:22right now is uh making a lot of money
- 9:26putting its new models to work in these
- 9:29wars. Uh they like these wars because
- 9:33they also get to test their weapon
- 9:35systems. They get to upgrade the
- 9:37systems. They get big military contracts
- 9:41and so forth. So
- 9:44what happened in the last couple of days
- 9:46is I would say par for the course. uh
- 9:50and the fact that Trump failed to uh end
- 9:56the war as he promised he would. The war
- 9:59in Ukraine with the phone call and
- 10:01within 24 hours is a sign of uh the
- 10:05underlying
- 10:07uh dynamics of US politics on the one
- 10:10side and the sheer incompetence,
- 10:14ignorance and foolishness of this man on
- 10:16the other side. He can't really do
- 10:19anything that reaches a level of
- 10:22strategy as opposed to uh hourly
- 10:26tactics. Tactics he can do hour to hour,
- 10:29though not consistently, but strategy
- 10:32he's unable to do.
- 10:35Well, uh, [clears throat] Mark Ruted,
- 10:37NATO Secretary General, he seemingly
- 10:39threw NATO's weight behind the US war on
- 10:41Iran by arguing that this, uh, America's
- 10:45decision to go back to war against Iran
- 10:47was totally justified and essentially,
- 10:50yeah, giving his full support. Um, uh,
- 10:53however, it also
- 10:56um sends a very direct signal to the
- 10:59Russians that is that NATO is not
- 11:01talking about peace anymore, only war.
- 11:03And we saw now that uh the the Kremlin
- 11:06spokesperson uh Dimmitri Pescov was
- 11:09arguing that uh well before this summit
- 11:12as well that the that the special
- 11:14military operation uh it has now become
- 11:16a war because of NATO's involvement. Uh
- 11:19there doesn't seem to be much effort
- 11:20anymore to prevent uh this march towards
- 11:24World War II.
- 11:27But I I did want to ask you though, how
- 11:28do you see this statement by the
- 11:30Russians? How will this change? uh um
- 11:34are they simply have they given up on uh
- 11:36the US uh diplomacy? Do they see it as a
- 11:39fraud like in Iran? Or how do you make
- 11:41sense of these uh new developments?
- 11:44>> I don't think anyone in the Russian
- 11:46leadership gives any heed whatsoever to
- 11:51the US or to US diplomacy. I think that
- 11:55they
- 11:57try not to
- 11:59antagonize Trump unnecessarily,
- 12:02but nobody uh in the Russian leadership
- 12:07is expecting Trump in any way to play a
- 12:11a a decisive or even an active role in
- 12:16uh stopping this war. Um that's over. I
- 12:20think they had some hope early on, but I
- 12:24think what's happened proves Putin's
- 12:28famous adage from a 2017 interview when
- 12:32he famously said uh that he had by then
- 12:36worked with several presidents. They
- 12:38come into office with ideas, but then
- 12:41men in dark suits uh and uh blue ties
- 12:45and briefcases come and explain how the
- 12:48world really is to these presidents and
- 12:51you never hear of those ideas again. So
- 12:54Putin had a lot of experience and I've
- 12:57spoken to Russian leaders over the
- 12:59years. They have a lot of experience
- 13:01knowing that presidents come and go. But
- 13:06the US
- 13:07security state, the military industrial
- 13:11digital complex is the the deeper part
- 13:15of American policy. So, I don't think
- 13:17that they ever uh absolutely were uh
- 13:21betting on the US to resolve this
- 13:25conflict, but I think they were hoping
- 13:27that maybe Trump would do something. And
- 13:31I think that they put some effort into
- 13:33that the first year, but by uh already
- 13:36the end of 2025, I think they had really
- 13:39given up on this. And the statements
- 13:41that they're making now are basically
- 13:45again not to uh go out of their way to
- 13:48antagonize Trump, but on the other hand
- 13:51are very clear to say we're basically at
- 13:54war. We don't think diplomacy is going
- 13:57to solve anything. We're going to win
- 14:00this war. And I think Russia has largely
- 14:05already for years, but certainly now uh
- 14:09given up on the west so-called meaning
- 14:13uh the European Union, Britain and uh
- 14:17the United States and Canada and it
- 14:20views its future uh basically as a
- 14:23Eurasian uh future and a future with
- 14:27other parts of the developing world as
- 14:30well.
- 14:31And my view is that that's essentially
- 14:34China's view. Uh it's essentially Iran's
- 14:37view. Uh it's essentially the view of uh
- 14:41most of Eurasia outside of Europe. Um,
- 14:47and this is, I think, where we're
- 14:49heading, which is a a a western world
- 14:53which is dug in to try to protect
- 14:59ancient and disappearing prerogatives
- 15:02and advantages that they don't have
- 15:04anymore. uh and uh the rest of the world
- 15:08uh saying
- 15:11we don't expect anything from you uh
- 15:14except maybe war and we'll meet that uh
- 15:17if necessary. Of course, the disaster in
- 15:20all of this is that uh the war kills
- 15:25vast numbers of Ukrainians. It solves
- 15:28absolutely nothing. And there is no way
- 15:32possible
- 15:34for Russia to be defeated other than uh
- 15:38bringing us to nuclear war because
- 15:40Russia is not going to surrender to uh
- 15:44strikes
- 15:47of uh Western support uh into deep
- 15:51Russia. it's going to escalate and if
- 15:54pushed hard enough and if those strikes
- 15:57were costly enough it will escalate to
- 16:00nuclear war. And so the whole idea of
- 16:04these uh western governments is a kind
- 16:07of profound uh ignorance uh and
- 16:12gratuitousness and recklessness
- 16:15that is astounding. Now, one thing that
- 16:19should give us some
- 16:22perspective and and pause is that all of
- 16:25these governments, Trump, uh, Mcronone,
- 16:29Mertz, uh,
- 16:32all of them are unpopular.
- 16:35Uh, the publics in the United States and
- 16:38Europe don't want these wars. They don't
- 16:41want the military escalation. The latest
- 16:45Gallup poll show the Ukrainians want
- 16:47this war to end, even if it means the
- 16:51kinds of concessions that would end the
- 16:54war. This is very clear. So what we have
- 16:58is a class of political leaders that uh
- 17:02operate um in an anacronistic way
- 17:06believing in western dominance and
- 17:09western power not understanding the
- 17:11changes of the world and not uh
- 17:15following or understanding their own
- 17:17public opinion. So there are I suppose
- 17:22three ways that all of this can break in
- 17:25the end. One is that Russia can outright
- 17:28achieve its military objectives. This is
- 17:32certainly quite possible. Uh some would
- 17:37say quite probable. The other is that
- 17:40this escalates to a nuclear war. I think
- 17:44that this is absolutely possible because
- 17:47we are led by the most incompetent
- 17:50people imaginable right now from Trump
- 17:53and Mertz and Mcronone and many others.
- 17:56And the third is that finally these
- 17:59wararmongering
- 18:01governments and wararmongering lobbies
- 18:04are thrown out by publics that are
- 18:06completely disgusted by them. So Mertz's
- 18:11approval rating is at an all-time low
- 18:13for German chancellors. The same with
- 18:15the president Mcronone. Trump's approval
- 18:18rating
- 18:20somehow still is above 35%.
- 18:24uh but it's under 40% and his
- 18:26disapproval rating is around 60%. And we
- 18:30have an election coming up that if it's
- 18:32actually run fairly and counted fairly
- 18:35is still with all of the shenanigans
- 18:38going on and there are many of them and
- 18:41all of the Supreme Court rulings in
- 18:43Trump's favor still likely to put uh the
- 18:47opposition into a majority in at least
- 18:50one of the houses of Congress. So maybe,
- 18:54just maybe, our very weak uh and uh
- 18:58seemingly failing democratic
- 19:01institutions could end up being a check
- 19:04uh on this uh quite miserable political
- 19:07class that we have and that would be the
- 19:10peaceful way out in the end.
- 19:14>> Yeah, I would like to see that. But uh
- 19:16it appears that the worse the war the
- 19:18the war goes uh the more they rely on
- 19:21the war. That is uh when the economies
- 19:23of Europe gets weaker they look towards
- 19:25more militarism for economic and
- 19:27technological development. When uh the
- 19:30our leaders lose support from their
- 19:33public because of the war. They then use
- 19:35the war to crush the scent by
- 19:37essentially dismissing all opposition as
- 19:39being you know some pro Kremlin
- 19:42conspiracy. And also when we see the
- 19:45west fragmenting we hear that you know
- 19:47we essentially get the message that
- 19:48fighting Russia is the new unifying
- 19:50idea. So, it's u I I don't see the
- 19:54course correction just yet, but
- 19:55hopefully
- 19:56>> Glenn, I think all of that is exactly
- 19:58right, of course, except that the public
- 20:02is not being pulled along uh in France
- 20:07with Maria Lean now contesting the
- 20:12presidency next year, that will become
- 20:15France's major political drama, not
- 20:19Ukraine. uh uh in Russia with the IFD uh
- 20:24surging in the polls and saying uh that
- 20:28Germany needs a completely different
- 20:30approach based on diplomacy visa to be
- 20:33Russia that is a potential break and in
- 20:38the United States the overwhelming
- 20:41opposition of the public to Israel and
- 20:46what h happened the genocide in Gaza and
- 20:49now to The war in Iran is also uh
- 20:53potentially
- 20:55uh a change of direction in American
- 20:58politics. I grant you none of this is
- 21:02simple uh because the
- 21:05deep military war machine is extremely
- 21:11powerful in the US and Europe. uh and uh
- 21:14these politicians are basically
- 21:18operating mouthpieces for a much deeper
- 21:23uh set of narrow interests but quite
- 21:27powerful narrow interests. But I think
- 21:29that it is encouraging that the public
- 21:32does not accept this. And um
- 21:37that means that even with all of the
- 21:41absolutely clear resistance of the
- 21:44political class, and you're completely
- 21:46right on it, there's nothing that's
- 21:48changing the dynamics within this group
- 21:51of politicians.
- 21:53But what might change it is political
- 21:56defeat uh by outside parties that are
- 22:01tapping into the true public opinion.
- 22:06Uh I know you have to run so let me just
- 22:08ask a very quick brief question that is
- 22:11uh the absence of strategy as you said
- 22:13is quite evident but uh what what do you
- 22:16think are the objectives now of the
- 22:18Americans and versus the Europeans in
- 22:22terms of well their main rival as we saw
- 22:25at the summit which is Russia. Uh what
- 22:28is it that they actually want to achieve
- 22:29here? Is it simply to bring the
- 22:31Americans into the deeper into the war
- 22:33or how are you reading this? Because um
- 22:35it doesn't seem rational to push this
- 22:38hard for a war with the world's largest
- 22:40nuclear power.
- 22:42We should uh of course start from the
- 22:44proposition that since 1945
- 22:48and certainly since 1991 at the supposed
- 22:52end of the Cold War, the deep state uh
- 22:56or militaryindustrial complex intention
- 23:00has been to weaken Russia in any
- 23:04opportunistic way possible to support
- 23:07whatever uh insurgencies on Russia's
- 23:11periphery.
- 23:12to surround Russia in the Black Sea with
- 23:14NATO enlargement to try to create unrest
- 23:18by so-called economic tools, the
- 23:22unilateral sanctions, uh the
- 23:25confiscation of Russia's money and so
- 23:27forth. And I don't think those goals
- 23:30have changed in again uh the basic
- 23:35driver of foreign policy in the United
- 23:38States, the CIA uh and the military
- 23:42contractors and now the palunteers and
- 23:45others uh of the world.
- 23:48They don't count lives. They don't count
- 23:51money. Uh they uh are out to sell their
- 23:55goods. Uh and uh if the US goes broke in
- 23:58the process, that's just fine. We've uh
- 24:01created a class of uh wararmongering
- 24:05billionaires uh that speak publicly
- 24:09about how important these wars of by the
- 24:13western world are. Um
- 24:17so th this is really our uh
- 24:20ongoing situation. uh and uh it is the
- 24:25basic motivation that is either going to
- 24:28drive us to complete disaster which is
- 24:32brewing right now um or to some kind of
- 24:37break in the politics because the public
- 24:42can finally is able to use the tools of
- 24:45democracy to make their views heard.
- 24:49Admittedly, that hasn't happened. And
- 24:52the United States, you know, for decades
- 24:54pleased Western European politics to
- 24:58make sure that no anti-American politics
- 25:02could survive.
- 25:04And um that kind of placing continues
- 25:08until today. But I would say most of our
- 25:12western
- 25:13countries are in political crisis right
- 25:16now because of the divergence of the
- 25:19dominant interests uh class interests of
- 25:23this military militarized state and the
- 25:27broader public opinion which understands
- 25:30that this is this is a disaster. So I
- 25:34think um we we will continue to
- 25:37flounder. Don't expect anything from
- 25:41Trump. Uh anything sensible, any
- 25:44direction that is sustained. Uh he
- 25:49becomes uh
- 25:51more and more incoherent and less and
- 25:53less relevant actually except that he
- 25:56loves to dominate the media and the
- 25:58media love to pay attention to every
- 26:02idiotic utterance of this man.
- 26:05Well, Jeff, thank you so much for taking
- 26:07the time and um yes, I know you have a
- 26:09busy day there in Usbekistan. So, thanks
- 26:11again.
- 26:11>> Yeah, great to be with you. Thanks.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Jeffrey Sachs: Disastrous NATO Summit: Toward Nuclear War with Russia by Glenn Diesen, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,290 words across 499 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.