YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → I Made $158,400 In One Month (Trading SMC Traps)

I Made $158,400 In One Month (Trading SMC Traps) — Transcript

by Waqar Asim · 5,498 words · 780 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00I made $158,400
0:03in a single calendar month trading
0:05against Smart Money Concepts. So, out of
0:07the public signals, you know, the live
0:09callouts that I've been doing for the
0:10last 3 years, giving the before, the
0:12entry and stop loss, the during, the
0:14full commentary of the trade, and then
0:15the after, exactly how to manage the
0:17position, when to go break even, and
0:18when to take a partial, and when to
0:20close out the trade. for years now,
0:21showing you how an advanced trader, as
0:23I've been trading for 11 years now,
0:25navigates intraday and intraession
0:26trading, scalping with high win rate and
0:28high risk-to-reward. So, by the end of
0:30this video, you're going to see an
0:31entire one month walkthrough of trading
0:33against SMC, my personal favorite setup,
0:36and all of the proof and transparency of
0:38every single trade taken live. So,
0:40ladies and gents, welcome to this mega
0:41masterclass. 16 live call [music] outs,
0:4416 public signals, an entire one month
0:46walkthrough and doing against the masses
0:48that is SMC Concepts. So, let's walk
0:51through price action of my favorite
0:52trade of the month. So, this month I
0:54took 22 trades between EU and GU. You
0:56see my win rate. You see the amount I
0:57made. But this trade that I'm going to
0:59show you now was my favorite of the
1:00month. Why? Because it was so easy, so
1:02clear, and most importantly, it relied
1:04on my favorite things, which is traps
1:05and manipulations. I don't follow smart
1:07money concepts. I don't follow market
1:08structure. I don't follow trend. I don't
1:09follow all of these things. I take
1:10pieces of them of what's relevant. But I
1:12also know in the markets, the reality is
1:14strategies get crowded, which leads to
1:16alpha decay. These are not my words.
1:18This is actually literature that has
1:19been studied that you can find and also
1:21every single quant trader, every single
1:22hedge fund manager, every single real
1:24institutional trader that I know that
1:26I've spoken to on the podcast. They
1:27fully concern themselves with crowded
1:30strategy deployments, alpha decay, how
1:32much money they can pass through an
1:33edge. Why? Because crowded and alpha
1:35decay is real. Liquidity exists in the
1:37markets. So if everybody in the world is
1:39trading a Fibonacci level, it will not
1:41work. If everybody's trading the same
1:42supply area, it will not work because
1:44there's not enough liquidity. If
1:46everybody's selling at the same place,
1:47who's going to be the buyer of those
1:49sell positions? Logically, for every
1:51buyer, you need a seller. So, it cannot
1:53be everybody crowded one way. So,
1:54utilizing this, I've started to
1:56understand market impact is the favorite
1:57thing that I need to focus on. And I
1:59look at market impact around POIs. I
2:01look around market impact around supply
2:03and demand and market impact around
2:05smart money concepts because these areas
2:06are highly concentrated. There's a lot
2:08of people acting in a short window and
2:10once that gets induced and manipulated
2:12leads to a strong market impact that I
2:14can trade. That's my strategy. So, what
2:16I noticed over here, by the way, the
2:17trade that I'm going to show you is
2:18actually the trade from the 9th of
2:20September. It made me $48,000 and it was
2:23a public signal number 79. And you can
2:25see actually the full walk through here.
2:27Beautiful playing to perfection. TP1
2:29hits locking in 1 to three risk reward,
2:30which means 1.5R cuz I took 50% volume.
2:33TP2 at 1 to 10 locking in 5%. Why?
2:36Because of 50% volume. Trade total plus
2:386.5%. Public signals reaching this. And
2:40you can see the full targets. But that's
2:42the after. And then we also have the
2:43during where I hit TP1. You can see the
2:46date and time stamp of everything on the
2:48trade log on the upload itself. And most
2:50importantly, not just the during where I
2:51hit TP1, but the before. So you can see
2:53at 619 I'm taking the trade myself. You
2:55can see my Metatrader entry 620. You can
2:57see the position that I'm posting. And
2:59I'm saying enter here green line. You
3:01can see the full analysis down to M1 of
3:03the entry, stop-loss, and take profit
3:05areas, smart money traps, and targets.
3:06But most importantly, I gave it ahead of
3:08time because 45 minutes before that, I
3:10was saying I'm looking for sells in this
3:12area. I'm just looking for confirmation,
3:14giving the ideation stalking for an
3:16entry and then showing the entry itself,
3:18my entry, the public signal entry, the
3:20timestamps of everything. And then you
3:21can see it play out. TP1 over here. I
3:23monitored it. I logged it. I took it
3:25myself. And then TP number two over
3:27here, the proof and transparency. By the
3:29way, it's not just me. We see it every
3:30time in the comment section. Mari,
3:32you're the freaking goat, man. I was 1%
3:34down on phase one evaluation and now
3:36this person has got phase one complete.
3:37A lot of people taking these trades
3:39alongside me. You can see another person
3:41over here caught the exact same trade.
3:42You can see the MetaTrader. You have so
3:44many people catching these trades
3:45because these signals are getting so
3:47many views. This one having 61,000 views
3:49for TP2, 87,000 views for TP1 and also
3:53the original signal getting $66,000. So
3:56approaching 200,000 views of people
3:58witnessing this trade and it was my
4:00favorite trade that made me money. As
4:02you can see over here, the live call
4:03out, the proof of everything. Now, let's
4:05break it down very quickly. In case
4:06you're not aware, for the last three
4:07years, I've been publicly sharing my
4:09trades, giving the before, the during,
4:11and the after with a full commentary,
4:13explanation, and a walkthrough on my
4:15trade management and psychology through
4:17the entire process. I'm standing here
4:19with a three-year auditable performance
4:21of 95 trades and 99.45%
4:24gain, closing in on that magical 100%
4:27gain that each one of you can go and
4:29check and verify by yourself. And
4:30through this three-year process, I
4:32learned a lot of lessons that I want to
4:33share with you. One thing that I noted
4:35was 60% of my profit was actually coming
4:38from one setup. And here's what
4:39surprised me. It wasn't that it was
4:40winning more often. In fact, it had an
4:42ordinary win rate of around 45%. The
4:45risk-to-reward was pretty average at 1
4:47to 3.7 on average, but I was getting
4:50paid 50% more on this setup than I was
4:53on my other types of setups. In 2023,
4:5538% of my trades were actually following
4:57this trade model and system. However, in
5:002026, 95% of my trades, my trading
5:03success this year was around this trade
5:05model, which means over the years, I was
5:07trimming the fat on my ineffective
5:09setups. I was focusing on which one was
5:11putting money in my bank account. I'm
5:13going to be sharing it all with you. The
5:14specific confluence that I focus on to
5:16find my trading success, the full thing,
5:18not just a concept, not just a glimpse,
5:20a full entire strategy walkthrough of my
5:23most effective setup. Seats for this
5:25live workshop are going to be limited
5:27because I'm going to be doing Q&A. I
5:29want participation. I want a dialogue
5:30where I want you to submit your chart. I
5:32want to go through your questions and
5:34doubts. So if you want to reserve your
5:35place as seats are limited, I encourage
5:37you pause the video, click the link in
5:38the description, save your spot, and
5:40then jump back into today's video. So
5:41the main thing for me to notice, as I
5:43was mentioning earlier, I want to focus
5:44on premium. So in a bearish market, I
5:47want to focus above the 50%. How do I do
5:49that? I pull a Fibonacci from the low to
5:51the high like this, and I put a box
5:53above the 50%. above that 50% I'm okay
5:56to sell. But that's going to be a pretty
5:57broad zone because that 50% is
6:00representing hundreds of pips almost 300
6:02pips. So what I actually look at is more
6:04details. I understand how is the seller
6:06in control. And we see that we had a
6:08bullish markets prior. We made higher
6:10lows and higher highs. The final higher
6:12high up here. Then we had this area over
6:13here that could have made a higher high.
6:15It didn't. It failed to make a higher
6:17high and went on to make a lower low
6:19internally. We had a break. We had a
6:21test and a continuation to break
6:24structure. So now I've seen the
6:25liquidation point is around here. I
6:28notice the break test area, the test
6:30liquidity gets induced and forms the
6:33lower low breaking the previous low. So
6:35I found a clean trading range. Now that
6:37clean trading range is my daily high
6:39over here and my daily low. This red
6:41arrow is the impulse and it was
6:43originated from a inducement of the
6:45break test. After the low low, I know
6:47that the trend is likely to continue
6:48bearish from my red box and premium. But
6:50I don't want a 300 pip zone. So I look
6:52at POIs, engineered liquidity, existing
6:55liquidity. So I look for POIs inside
6:57that red box. And I see, okay, we have a
6:59decisional price did not respect it. And
7:01we have the extreme. Price is not in the
7:02decisional, not in the extreme. It's
7:04around. So what do I see? It's taken a
7:05weak POI. Why is this a weak POI? Cuz it
7:08broke internal structure. Low, lower
7:10high, lower low. This broke internal
7:13structure, not external structure.
7:14Therefore, it's a weak POI and I can see
7:16price grabs liquidity of that area and
7:19then starts to give bearish
7:20confirmations and I know that if the
7:22sellers are in control, we've had a
7:24major inducement in premium. Remember,
7:26of my three criteria, POI, existing
7:28liquidity, engineer liquidity, we've
7:30taken existing liquidity in premium. And
7:33if sellers are in control, the target is
7:35internal lows and external lows. So,
7:37this becomes a great long-term position.
7:39From there, when I know the inducement
7:40of control, I can jump down all the way
7:42to the M15. And I basically want to
7:44understand who is in control. How is
7:46that major inducement that we've just
7:47seen presenting control? So we see we
7:49had liquidity over here and it was ran.
7:51We had a mitigation over here. We have a
7:54buildup inducement. Mitigation
7:56mitigation. Sellers control right here.
7:58Mitigation shows sellers control.
8:00Sellers control with that liquidity
8:01cycle. Each one of these leading to an
8:02impulse lower impulse lower impulse
8:04lower. So I can start to see time and
8:06time again we have buildup inducement
8:08mitigation. Build up inducement
8:11mitigation. So we had another liquidity
8:13cycle here showing sellers control. So
8:14if I see sellers control every time
8:16there is an inducement leading to a push
8:18lower mitigation push lower liquidity
8:20cycle push lower liquidity cycle
8:23inducement push lower sellers are
8:25clearly in control. I mark out the last
8:27point of control which is this supply
8:28zone over here. And I see price arrive
8:31and navigate around it. And all I want
8:32to see is all the smart money traps.
8:34This is where people are starting to
8:35hate and not really agree with me. So
8:37let me break it down very quickly. As we
8:39open up on Wednesday the 9th of
8:41September, the day I took the trade and
8:42gave the signal. What do we have prior?
8:44So we have the Asia range. Above the
8:46Asia range, we have the high of previous
8:48day. Now the key detail is what is high
8:49of previous day showing me? If I have
8:51this area of high of previous day, but
8:53in fact we had a manipulation lower.
8:55Notice this detail. We had equal lows.
8:58We had a sweep. We had bullish push out
9:00but no strength. We had a smart money
9:02trap inducement that led to the push
9:04out. Smart money trap inducement is real
9:07control. After that real control, I see
9:09a push out. We form an internal higher
9:11high, but we haven't broken structure
9:12yet. So, this is not a supply zone. This
9:15is just a higher high. Higher high is
9:17not supply. Even though price looks like
9:18it's rejecting, rejecting, rejecting,
9:20not supply, it's liquidity. So, I know
9:22liquidity is above here. I also know we
9:24have this area over here where I have a
9:26buildup Asia high sweep leading to a
9:29bearish push, breaking, and making a
9:31lower low. This is a classic supply
9:33zone. Smart money traders are going to
9:35be waiting for this area as a smart
9:37money trap. Why is it a smart money
9:38trap? Because Asia high gets swept and
9:41price comes into it during Frankfurt and
9:43London. People are going to be selling
9:44but this is a false supply zone smart
9:47money trap. So this is how I notice the
9:49details and then I see this trend line
9:50liquidity presenting this smart money
9:52trap presenting. Why is this a smart
9:54money trap? Because we have market
9:56structure traders thinking perfect. We
9:57have a higher low down here that's made
10:00a higher high. We've come back down made
10:02a higher low into demand. We made
10:03another higher high. People are going to
10:04be buying on this area. Wrong. Smart
10:07money trap. So we have traps of demand
10:09areas, traps of smart money sweeps over
10:11here. The same thing. We've come to the
10:12supply zone. We have a buildup of
10:14liquidity. We have a sweep. We have a
10:16push lower. People are going to be
10:18selling here naturally. And price. What
10:20does it do? It messes around, gives sell
10:22entries, gives sell biases before
10:24inducing. And I can start to see the
10:25real inducement of control. And then
10:27this is where I focus on my M1 for the
10:29entry because I know with the divergence
10:31this was the inducement of the day. Once
10:33I have the inducement of the day I
10:34follow intent. So I start to see number
10:36one we have a bearish push lower
10:38exaggerating equal lows but we have
10:40equal lows sweep push high push high
10:43push high trend line. Who's buying in
10:45these areas? Naturally smart money
10:47traders. So when price comes into this
10:48area and gives a bullish reaction again
10:50who's entering? Naturally smart money
10:52traders. They've seen equal lows.
10:54They've seen a sweep. They've seen a
10:55push out. comes back to the demand order
10:57block fair value gap and then goes
10:59again. Why? Because we have this
11:00liquidity that is taken. People are
11:02going to be buying here. I trade against
11:03SMC. Another one here. Look, we have
11:06equal highs over here. We have a sweep.
11:08Smart money trap gets induced then gives
11:10liquidity. So I focus on all the smart
11:12money traps to show me where things are
11:14going to go wrong. And I wait for the
11:15real inducements to show me inducement
11:17of control of this smart money trap.
11:19Build up smart money trap. Real
11:21inducement shows me control. And then we
11:23have this area sweeping, divergence, and
11:26pushing lower, breaking the smart money
11:27trap. This is exactly the area that I
11:29was monitoring before I took the trade.
11:31And this is exactly the price action
11:33I've taken upon once we had that supply
11:35zone, the induction of the day getting
11:37mitigated and giving a bearish reaction.
11:38You can see right here we had equal
11:40highs, we had the sweep, we had the push
11:42out, mitigating divergence, and giving
11:44the push lower engulfing. So that
11:46becomes my exact entry. Once I saw price
11:48mitigating the previous divergence
11:50inducment of the day of a smart money
11:51trap price came into that area gave an
11:53engulfing I enter. We didn't break even
11:55until we shifted below this. Eventually
11:57we get a mitigation divergence and price
11:59tanks lower. Perfect public signal from
12:02entry to TP1 to TP2. Perfectly traded.
12:06So with absolute transparency, let's
12:07walk through all of the account data.
12:09The reason I always do this is so that
12:10you know what you're learning on this
12:12channel is real. It's work. It's not
12:13guru marketing. that has led to real
12:15results for me that I've publicly
12:17shared, but also for my community who
12:19have made over a million dollars in
12:20track earnings this year. And I'm going
12:22to show you the proof of that later on,
12:23too. So, something that every trader
12:25needs to realize is your northstar, your
12:27reality is your positive expectancy,
12:30what you will actually get from your
12:31edge, because you can't cheat your edge.
12:33You can have temporary highs. You can
12:34have temporary underperformance. You can
12:36go on tilt. You can have a lucky period.
12:37But generally speaking, every time you
12:39move away from the average or go down
12:41below the average, you will always end
12:43up back converging towards reality. That
12:45is your positive expectancy. And a
12:47beginner trader, they can get caught up
12:49in temporary performance. They've either
12:50beaten the edge and they're a better
12:52trader than their data shows. And they
12:53start aggressively sizing. They start
12:55chasing bigger lot sizes. They start
12:57chasing more setups and what becomes
12:58good performance through the random
13:00distribution of outcomes. Because as we
13:02know a trader it's not just win win win
13:04loss loss loss if you have a 50% win
13:06rate. It can be win loss win loss win
13:08loss. It can also be loss loss loss loss
13:10win. So we don't know how our wins and
13:12losses will be distributed. But we know
13:14the reality is our northstar is our
13:16positive expectancy. So if you have a
13:18temporary high you can now get
13:19overzealous and then actually whipsaw
13:21from a positive performance to a
13:23negative performance. But all the while
13:25you will always end up at your northstar
13:27which is your positive expectancy. So
13:28when traders start to modify and play
13:30games and try to trade aggressively or
13:32differently to get more payouts or to
13:34get funded faster all of these games and
13:35tricks are only temporary and what you
13:37cannot hide away from which will always
13:39reveal is your reality which is your
13:40edge. This yellow box is the entire
13:42month of September. So we can start to
13:44see we had higher time frame bearish and
13:46we looked for a replication. We already
13:48discussed this in previous videos but
13:49it's very simple. Just following high
13:51time frame trend we can see we had a
13:52bearish impulse in the market. When we
13:54crossed the 50% in premium, we look for
13:56POI existing liquidity or engineered
13:59liquidity. What did we have? We had
14:00existing liquidity of a weak POI in
14:02premium. This is not a decisional. This
14:04is not an extreme. It broke internal
14:06structure. So, we have a lower high that
14:08made a lower low internally but didn't
14:10break external structure. So, it's not a
14:12decisional and it's not an extreme. So,
14:13we have a weak POI that we had an
14:15inducement of in premium that began the
14:18continuation of the trend. So, how do I
14:20know it's time to pull off the gas? is
14:22because we met our target. Our target
14:24was a daily external low and that's
14:26where we were trading the entire month.
14:27We were looking for sells all the way
14:29down until our trend was complete and we
14:32made the lower low. Our trading range is
14:34lower high that goes on to make a lower
14:36low. Then we wait for a retracement and
14:38then a new low to be formed. So once
14:40that new low is formed as it has right
14:41now at the beginning of October, we can
14:43expect price to climb, retrace, price
14:46could keep shooting lower. It could
14:47consolidate a bit and then continue
14:49lower. We don't know what's happening
14:50next. But we know our main objective has
14:52been met. So now it's time to slow
14:54things down because I've deviated away
14:56too far from my edge and I know it's not
14:58going to sustain because price action is
15:00showing me and the data is showing me.
15:02So a few other things to notice is win
15:04rate. How is that calculated? Well, it
15:05could be all of your wins compared to
15:07all of your trades taken that were wins
15:08and losses or it could be all of your
15:10wins compared to every single trade that
15:12you took. So if I've taken nine winning
15:13trades and include my losses. So I've
15:15got 12 nine wins out of 12 trades that
15:17were wins or losses is the 75% win rate
15:20that we are showcasing here. But if I
15:22consider all of my trades taken. So nine
15:24winning trades including my losses
15:26including my break evens, then it's 9
15:27out of 22. So that's around 40% of all
15:30of my trades placed were wins. Or if I
15:32consider how many losses I took, well
15:34then out of all of my 22 trades, only
15:36three of them were losses. So about a
15:3814% loss rate. So it depends how you
15:41read it. But this is important to note
15:42that I'm having a very positive period
15:44because there's only three losses, a lot
15:46of break evens. And you may be
15:47wondering, what does that mean? I'm
15:48going to talk about it in just a moment
15:50because I want to debrief account
15:51metrics to show you how not only I trade
15:53technicals, but how I navigate an
15:55account to get more money out of the
15:57market for the same effort, the same
15:59place trades. And a few other things to
16:01note, New York key time window is vastly
16:03profitable for me. And I made a lot more
16:04money. I made $138,000 selling, but only
16:07$20,000 buying. Well, that's obvious. We
16:09were in a downtrend. And so a few buys
16:11that I took that were hedges or counter
16:12trend plays, they played out. But
16:14naturally, I'm going to have more profit
16:15in the sells because higher time frame
16:17was bearish. But here are some more
16:18interesting stats. Out of EU and GU, the
16:20two things that I'm trading, I made way
16:22more money trading Euro dollar. Even
16:24though I only traded seven times on Euro
16:26Dollar, but of the public signals, there
16:28was 14 trades that I took. And out of
16:30those 14 trades that I took, it had a
16:3236% win rate versus 57. So this is
16:34telling me, this is for me to
16:35understand. The trend was clearer on EU
16:38and it was more effective at selling.
16:39Why is that? Because EU is a clear
16:41downtrend. I was selling the whole way
16:43down from this bearish market we can
16:45see. But GU is a little bit different
16:46because it's not a clear downtrend.
16:48Let's break it down. So, as you can see,
16:50long-term performance in the market is
16:51truly possible. You've seen me do it for
16:53years now. I've been trading for over a
16:54decade and I've shown a three-year track
16:56record performance and you've seen my
16:58this month's performance or live call
16:59lots as regular. I want to show you
17:01above that that is not just my
17:03performance, but the community
17:04performance inside of WWA trading. So,
17:06across all of our Discord messages, all
17:08of our students, over 25,000 citations
17:11within our Discord, which is all
17:12searchable, I'm going to show you
17:14everything. You can see inside of our
17:15community, we've got $1 million cross
17:17this month in tracked earnings, tracked
17:19payouts from our members, and $11
17:21million in funding from our VIP member
17:24community members. Most importantly,
17:26this is the key stats to focus on. How
17:27we shift the curve in your benefits, a
17:30distribution of probabilities. What that
17:32means is in the industry, there is a
17:340.4% 4% chance you will reach a payout.
17:36And the second payout is 0.04%.
17:40There is a 0.04% chance you will get a
17:42second payout. This is from public
17:44documents. You can see from the My Forex
17:45Funds prop firm legal case that was
17:48audited and published by the regulator.
17:50This is real stats in the industry. But
17:51inside of our community, not only the
17:53funding and the million dollars in
17:54payout and tracked earnings. You can see
17:56the reports are getting payout number
17:58two or more. Remember in the industry is
18:000.04%. Inside of our community, it's
18:0260%. Remember this is a 6-month
18:05incubator. So within 6 months they go
18:07from zero unprofitable, don't know the
18:09strategy. They reach on average the
18:11first milestone in 99 days to
18:13approximately 3 months you reach your
18:14first funded account, first payout,
18:16first broker profit, whatever that first
18:18milestone is within 3 months. And then
18:21within 6 months, the odds are you are
18:23getting payout number two or more. The
18:24odds are heavily stacked in your favor
18:26if you consider our community and
18:28ecosystem. Why? Because we don't just
18:29give you a pre-recorded course and say,
18:31"Hope you figure it out." We take things
18:33personal which is why we have a whole
18:34ecosystem of technology. We have daily
18:37live streams pre-London and pre- New
18:39York to prepare you for the day ahead.
18:41Every single day, every single key time
18:42window, you are not going in blind. You
18:44are going in ready by understanding the
18:46direction, the traps, exactly what to
18:48look for. Every single day, we're
18:49running webinars and classes to drill
18:51home the theory so that you take the
18:53concepts and can see an application in
18:55price every single day. Multiple times a
18:57week, Q&A calls inside. We have
18:59homeworks, quizzes, daily questions,
19:01daily community interaction, and even
19:03one-on-one coaching, which means someone
19:05literally holds your hand and walks you
19:07through the entire process, understands
19:09your bottlenecks, your pain points,
19:10where you are struggling, what you need
19:12help on, a personalized experience
19:14leading to this industry-leading
19:16results. Which is why in the industry of
19:18trading, we trading have the best Trust
19:21Pilot reviews, third party verified
19:23reviews, industry-leading in the
19:25hundreds of reviews. And each review is
19:27paragraph after paragraph, not just a
19:29quick oneliner. If that sounds something
19:30interesting to you, click the link in
19:32the description and apply. Remember,
19:33because we do one-on-one coaching, we
19:35cannot accept everyone because there's
19:37not enough hours in the day. But my
19:38promise to you is whether we accept you
19:40or we don't, we will leave you better
19:42than we found you with some resources to
19:43help you along the way. But if we do
19:45accept you, then hopefully see you on a
19:46Zoom call very soon. Okay, back into the
19:48video. So, we have a daily time frame
19:50impulse making a higher high. We come
19:52back to the demand area. We have an
19:54internal break of structure. The last
19:55lower high that made a lower low, we
19:56made a high high. After we had the
19:58higher high, we had the retracement back
19:59down into this demand area. We did not
20:01respect the demand. We had a structural
20:03major inducement into the previous area
20:06that led to a break of structure. So we
20:07had a previous lower high that made a
20:09lower low, breaking structure higher. So
20:11when I see we have the structural
20:12inducement that leads to a break of
20:13structure, breaking the previous lower
20:15high that made this lower low. Then we
20:17had a trend shift bullish. Then we had
20:19the higher low. This area did not go on
20:21to make a lower low and continue this
20:23bearish trend we were seeing. It was not
20:24a grab of liquidity to continue lower.
20:26In fact, it made a higher low that fails
20:28to make a lower low and goes on to make
20:30a higher high internally breaking this
20:32and breaking this. We had internal daily
20:34structure broken. And then once we had
20:35that liquidity grab that I was seeing,
20:37this was the entire month that we
20:38traded. So, it's a little bit different.
20:40Why? Because we have demand area down
20:42here. We have a decisional area over
20:44here. So, we have a few points where the
20:46market could do something different. We
20:47know we are in a pullback. Then we
20:49arrive to this demand area. Price could
20:50continue bullish. when we see that
20:52decisional area fail where we see we
20:54grab liquidity and then continue lower
20:56then we say okay we continue bearish to
20:58where to this demand area so those were
21:00the sells that were effective then I
21:01look for buys in this area they don't
21:03play out maybe I took some losses and
21:05then we broke this demand area and I
21:07think okay price has now broken a low if
21:09we have a bearish break of structure
21:10like this that means from here if we've
21:11had a break of structure bearish the
21:13market could continue lower the market
21:15could consolidate before continuing
21:17higher we could start to retrace and
21:19then reject there's a lot of
21:20possibilities And that's where things
21:22were a little bit more confusing because
21:23it was not a simple bearish trend like
21:25EU. That's why this one had less
21:26efficacy in this period. It doesn't mean
21:28I'm worse at GU. It just means this
21:30period didn't suit my trading style or I
21:33didn't read things appropriately because
21:34they weren't as easy to read. But one
21:36thing that has always been true to me,
21:37I've said it many times. It's my
21:38personal psychology. I'm not the best at
21:40buying. Whether it's a bullish market or
21:42bearish markets, it's just not what I'm
21:44skilled at. And I found a few years ago
21:46that majority of my losses, a big
21:48portion, disproportionate amount of my
21:49losses came from buy trades on
21:51Thursdays. So for a good one-year period
21:53a few years ago, I completely stopped
21:55buying on Thursday because I realized
21:57that was an outlier for me. So I studied
21:59my metrics to know how to perform. I've
22:01generally found I'm not as good as
22:02buying that as I'm selling even in a
22:04bullish market. So a full overview of
22:06this month. Remember every single one of
22:08these trades, this is a look inside of
22:09my account. every single execution that
22:11I've personally taken and the money that
22:12I've made. Remember on screen you can
22:14see from the last video I broke it down
22:15in detail my personal my effects book
22:17undeniable proof a track record of my
22:20performance that I publicly shared that
22:21no other guru is doing. For example,
22:23this day over here where I lost $8,000.
22:25We made a video to showcase not just the
22:27highs but also the lows. And most
22:28importantly, every single trade on this
22:31month is a live call out. Public signal
22:33number 78 on the 8th of September all
22:35the way to public signal number 94 on
22:38the 30th of September. So, we have a
22:39three-level audit over here. We have a
22:41my effects book. We have live call outs
22:43that cannot be faked or manipulated. And
22:45then we have a look inside my brokerage
22:46account. The reason I go to these
22:48lengths, by the way, is because a lot of
22:50traders in the industry that show
22:51transparency can be fake because brokers
22:54give marketing accounts to influencers
22:55so that they can just place trades on
22:57the back end after price has already
22:58played and they can show you all of the
23:00profit for the month on their phone with
23:01a live badge because the broker just
23:03simply typed it in and moved it to a
23:05live account. No profit, no real trades.
23:07Even profaser
23:10in the industry gives out marketing
23:12certificates to affiliates and
23:14influencers. Meaning even the QR code
23:16when you scan it, it will show the
23:17profit that they've made. Even though
23:19it's a fake certificate, it's a win for
23:20the influencer because they can sell
23:22more things and it's a win for the prof
23:24because they can say we pay out. But all
23:25the while it's completely unethical and
23:27it's fake because no money is being
23:28made. And even if the profit
23:30certificates is real, we don't know with
23:31that 100k payout how much they spent on
23:33evaluations because I've literally heard
23:35and seen examples of traders spending
23:37six figures to show a five figure
23:39payout, losing money but only showing
23:42the certificate because it looks good
23:43online. So when everything in this
23:45industry can be faked, the only thing
23:46that cannot be faked is a three-level
23:48audit that I'm doing with live callouts.
23:50And in the link in the description, you
23:51can check out my three-year track
23:53record. Remember, this is just one
23:54setup, but I want you to focus on the
23:56long-term performance for the entire
23:58month where I made six figures and also
24:00the three-year track record to show you
24:01reality and transparency. If you want to
24:03trade like this, my biggest advice to
24:04you is to remember as always, a
24:06restricted trader is a profitable
24:07trader.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of I Made $158,400 In One Month (Trading SMC Traps) by Waqar Asim, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 5,498 words across 780 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.