YouTube2Text

I Asked DNI Tulsi Gabbard About The CIA's 'Operation Mockingbird' Her Honest Answer SHOCKS Internet… — Transcript

by Benny Johnson · 2,424 words · 394 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00And we cannot conduct covert operations
  2. 0:02if a committee puts out a report which
  3. 0:04refers to an activity which leaves out
  4. 0:06the name of a country or individual
  5. 0:07concerned but gives enough evidence for
  6. 0:10any amateur sleuth to identify it beyond
  7. 0:13a shadow of a doubt in times for its
  8. 0:15identification to be carried with the
  9. 0:17news stories of the report itself.
  10. 0:19>> That is the but you believe you're
  11. 0:21consistent with the statutes but there
  12. 0:22isn't any statute that prohibits your
  13. 0:25interception of domestic communications.
  14. 0:26>> I believe that's correct.
  15. 0:30What's up, guys? Spenny. One of the
  16. 0:31things that make my skin crawl every
  17. 0:33couple of months is a new compilation of
  18. 0:36news anchors using the exact same
  19. 0:38terminology, saying the exact same
  20. 0:40script about the exact same thing. You
  21. 0:43can put compilations together like this
  22. 0:44and it really creeps you out.
  23. 0:46>> Russian collusion.
  24. 0:47>> Trump Russian sort of collusion.
  25. 0:48>> Trump Russian possible collusion. Trump
  26. 0:50Russian metal collusion. Trump Russian
  27. 0:52possible collusion.
  28. 0:53>> Trump Russian potentially collusion.
  29. 0:54Trump Russia possible collusion. Trump
  30. 0:56Russian possible collusion. Trump,
  31. 0:58Russian blood, collusion. Trump, Russia,
  32. 1:00Russian collusion. Trump, Russia,
  33. 1:02possible collusion. Russian hacked our
  34. 1:04election. Here comes a big change
  35. 1:06because all of a sudden Trump Russian
  36. 1:09possible collusion. Russian Russian
  37. 1:11collusion. Russian possible collusion.
  38. 1:14Russian possible collusion. Trump with
  39. 1:15the Russians. Collusion.
  40. 1:17>> Collusion with the Russians. Trump.
  41. 1:19Russia. Possible collusion. Trump.
  42. 1:20Russia. Possible collusion. Prove
  43. 1:22collusion.
  44. 1:23>> Prove collusion.
  45. 1:25>> Look at them clapping. It's like they've
  46. 1:27been trained.
  47. 1:28>> Absolutely.
  48. 1:29>> Ladies and gentlemen, uh the reason why
  49. 1:31it's so creepy to me is because now
  50. 1:35we're learning that Operation
  51. 1:38Mockingbird, which is of course the old
  52. 1:42CIA plot to control all of American
  53. 1:45media is actually alive and well based
  54. 1:48on an interview that we just wrapped
  55. 1:49with Tulsi Gabbard. Now, we've had
  56. 1:51little sprinklings of this here and
  57. 1:53there. For instance, James O'Keefe
  58. 1:54caught in a CIA officer undercover
  59. 1:57talking about how they're going to put
  60. 1:59Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones out of
  61. 2:01jail because they refuse to repeat the
  62. 2:04established talking points. And we have
  63. 2:06Tucker Carlson many times over
  64. 2:09explaining that he's been pressured to
  65. 2:11repeat the established talking points.
  66. 2:13What is this? Well, it's part of
  67. 2:15Operation Mockingbird. This is a
  68. 2:17operation that's well documented here.
  69. 2:19You hear the CIA, for instance, reading
  70. 2:22room,
  71. 2:23hundreds of pages of the CIA pressuring
  72. 2:28or forcing reporters to write specific
  73. 2:32narratives. In some instances, according
  74. 2:35to these documents that are publicly
  75. 2:36available, imagine what's not publicly
  76. 2:38available. The CIA placed their own
  77. 2:41agents as reporters
  78. 2:44inside of newsrooms
  79. 2:46in order to literally be CIA vehicles
  80. 2:49and assets
  81. 2:52for what Americans are thinking. CIA's
  82. 2:53Operation Mockingbird was a supposed
  83. 2:55clandestine operation meant to
  84. 2:56manipulate the American media. Some
  85. 2:58believe it's still active today.
  86. 3:01Let's read.
  87. 3:03Uh, in 1977, journalist Carl Bernstein
  88. 3:05published an article in the Rolling
  89. 3:06Stone serious allegation that hundreds
  90. 3:08of American journalists worked for the
  91. 3:11intelligence agency, the CIA.
  92. 3:14The operation uh for decades involved
  93. 3:17some of the most prominent news
  94. 3:18organizations in the world, including
  95. 3:19the New York Times, CBS, Time,
  96. 3:23and so on. Bernstein's reporting mostly
  97. 3:25focused on journalists who worked
  98. 3:27abroad, but ominous rumors soon emerged
  99. 3:29that the CIA was a using reporters to
  100. 3:31spread propaganda across America, which
  101. 3:32is of course against the CIA's founding
  102. 3:34charter. They're not allowed to run
  103. 3:37operations domestically. They have to be
  104. 3:38clandestine.
  105. 3:40Of course, that's not true. They are you
  106. 3:44using these reporters to manipulate
  107. 3:46public opinion at home. The program had
  108. 3:49a name, Operation Mockingbird.
  109. 3:52And what we found out is that Operation
  110. 3:54Mockingbird was absolutely real
  111. 3:58and that they had reporters in the
  112. 4:00biggest newsrooms in all of America.
  113. 4:01Reporters, they had CIA intelligence
  114. 4:03officers, assets, CIA agents just
  115. 4:06working hand and glove inside of
  116. 4:08newsrooms writing articles, producing
  117. 4:10the news.
  118. 4:13Operation Mockingbird
  119. 4:17uh uh in the New York Times first
  120. 4:19published the article closer than
  121. 4:21expected relationship between the CIA
  122. 4:23and the press. CIA director shared some
  123. 4:26details of the practice with reporters
  124. 4:28uh and finally had to fess up to
  125. 4:30congressional investigators
  126. 4:33for decades. For decades since World War
  127. 4:37II, when journalists came in close
  128. 4:39contact with CIA officers, obviously in
  129. 4:41uh the war zones, members of the Office
  130. 4:44of Strategic Services, which is the
  131. 4:46predecessor of the CIA,
  132. 4:48would often bump the reporters and get
  133. 4:50them to write what they wanted. In the
  134. 4:531950s and60s, early part of the Cold
  135. 4:55War, the program uh was ramped up
  136. 4:57heavily. We had journalists all over
  137. 4:59Berlin and Vienna uh to help us keep
  138. 5:02track of what was coming and what was
  139. 5:04happening.
  140. 5:05we were just running journalists. The
  141. 5:07program expanded and expanded and
  142. 5:09expanded and as it goes, ladies and
  143. 5:11gentlemen, eventually you just ended up
  144. 5:12having journalists inside of the biggest
  145. 5:14news organizations in America being
  146. 5:16bankrolled by the CIA. They have it all
  147. 5:20dead to rights. This was all exposed in
  148. 5:22the late '7s.
  149. 5:24Bernstein wrote that the program
  150. 5:25composed of accredited staff members of
  151. 5:26news organizations, freelancers,
  152. 5:28editors, publishers, columnists,
  153. 5:29commentators who work for organizations
  154. 5:30like the New York Times, CBS, Time
  155. 5:32magazine, and Newsweek, CIA bankrolled
  156. 5:36foreign press services to provide cover
  157. 5:37for operatives. Oo, baby.
  158. 5:42This is this is wild. After the
  159. 5:44publication, CIA officials told the New
  160. 5:45York Times that the number of
  161. 5:46journalists on the CIA's payroll was
  162. 5:49around 100.
  163. 5:51Okay, so a hundred different journalists
  164. 5:54are being paid directly by the CIA. Look
  165. 5:57at this. This is crazy, man. This is
  166. 6:01wild.
  167. 6:02Nobody's ever asked the CIA about this
  168. 6:05in modern times. Is it still going on?
  169. 6:08Apparently, they stopped it. We asked We
  170. 6:11asked Tulsi Gabbard yesterday. It went
  171. 6:12uh thermonuclear virals been seen by
  172. 6:15millions of people, shared by tens of
  173. 6:18thousands. Pulsey Gabbard confirming
  174. 6:19that Operation Mockingbird is still
  175. 6:21ongoing. What she told me was that yes,
  176. 6:24this is still happening and that we are
  177. 6:29fighting to this day intel operatives
  178. 6:32that are running
  179. 6:34disinformation campaigns through the
  180. 6:35corporate press.
  181. 6:37Ladies and gentlemen, here's my question
  182. 6:38to Tulsi. The media being used as a
  183. 6:41propaganda mechanism. We saw it flatly.
  184. 6:44I mean it I think it's the smoking gun
  185. 6:46quite frankly of the Obamagate narrative
  186. 6:49and the Russia gate narrative that it
  187. 6:50was so baked in that the New York Times
  188. 6:51and Washington Post went and ran with
  189. 6:53it. Some would say that that's part of
  190. 6:54Operation Mockingbird. Some would say
  191. 6:56that that's part of what we learned in
  192. 6:58the Church Committee that the intel
  193. 7:00agencies were using media outlets as
  194. 7:03their mouthpieces and that those
  195. 7:05mouthpieces uh would parrot the official
  196. 7:07narrative. And I wanted to ask you uh is
  197. 7:10this operation still going on? Are you
  198. 7:13aware of the intel agencies working
  199. 7:16directly with media outlets in order to
  200. 7:18push uh prescribed narratives that may
  201. 7:22or may not be true? It's it's something
  202. 7:24that we've already had to deal with,
  203. 7:26Benny, within this administration where
  204. 7:28there are people within the intelligence
  205. 7:30community who believe that their will is
  206. 7:33more important than the will of the
  207. 7:35American people uh and will weaponize
  208. 7:38intelligence by leaking it to their
  209. 7:41friends within the mainstream media with
  210. 7:43the intent of undermining President
  211. 7:45Trump's agenda. It is not one that uh uh
  212. 7:49he hasn't already talked about in every
  213. 7:52rally and town hall that he did
  214. 7:54throughout the campaign. I don't even
  215. 7:56know how many there were. But President
  216. 7:59Trump is enacting the very thing he
  217. 8:01promised the American people he would do
  218. 8:03in this election. So people in the
  219. 8:05intelligence community, they may agree,
  220. 8:07they may disagree. That's not uh that's
  221. 8:11not the point here. as intelligence
  222. 8:13professionals uh as people who work in
  223. 8:16the national security space uh in the
  224. 8:18intelligence community, they are
  225. 8:20required to fulfill their mandate to
  226. 8:23their oath to the Constitution of the
  227. 8:25United States uh and to the president of
  228. 8:28the United States who is duly elected by
  229. 8:30the American people. uh those who leak
  230. 8:33intelligence to their friends in the
  231. 8:35mainstream media with the intent of
  232. 8:37undermining the president who was
  233. 8:38elected by the American people. None of
  234. 8:41these intelligence professionals were
  235. 8:43they are subverting the will of the
  236. 8:45people and therefore undermining the
  237. 8:47constitution.
  238. 8:49>> It's wild that you're still having to
  239. 8:51deal with that. Call it what you will,
  240. 8:53but Operation Mockingbird, just
  241. 8:55incredible that they they were just out
  242. 8:56with it that they were using the media
  243. 8:59as government organs to push propaganda
  244. 9:01and it's still still happening today.
  245. 9:04This is why what we're doing is so
  246. 9:06important, Benny, and this is why
  247. 9:07President Trump's uh mandate in this is
  248. 9:10is really critical is uh by exposing the
  249. 9:14truth, by exposing the bad actors uh
  250. 9:18within the intelligence community and in
  251. 9:20the political space who are weaponizing
  252. 9:22intelligence to advance their own
  253. 9:24political interests is so important. uh
  254. 9:27to be able to turn the light on in
  255. 9:28places that have been dark for far too
  256. 9:30long, expose the truth and drive
  257. 9:33accountability. That's the only way that
  258. 9:35we can actually shift this uh and begin
  259. 9:37the work to try to restore trust uh in
  260. 9:40the intelligence community.
  261. 9:42>> This made some uh major news. We're
  262. 9:45proud to have asked. If you look at some
  263. 9:47of the things that John Brennan had been
  264. 9:49saying, he was going on talking about
  265. 9:51how he needs to we need to reestablish
  266. 9:54the control of the media because the
  267. 9:56narrative is getting out of control here
  268. 9:57with Russia gate. Probably the best
  269. 9:59person to comment on this uh in my
  270. 10:02lifetime has been Tucker Carlson who
  271. 10:04when he was speaking with Adam Corolla
  272. 10:06just directly called out operation
  273. 10:08mockingb bird payroll ease on the CNN
  274. 10:12payroll. I know that he's talking about
  275. 10:14Natasha Bertrand here. She's the one who
  276. 10:17uh writes the Hunter Biden laptop
  277. 10:18stories and leaks, the intel about the
  278. 10:21bombing in Iran and so on and so forth.
  279. 10:24Uh this is what's going on. It's still
  280. 10:26actively going on at CNN. Tucker Carlson
  281. 10:29blowing it wide open. And he's been
  282. 10:31doing just the absolute best work on
  283. 10:33this. The rewriting of Watergate scandal
  284. 10:35for instance, understanding that the
  285. 10:37people who broke the Watergate story,
  286. 10:39they're not they're not journalists at
  287. 10:40all. They were operatives from inside of
  288. 10:43the int like the Woodward and Bernstein.
  289. 10:46Like Bob Woodward was a Navy intel
  290. 10:50officer. He was recruited by the CIA. He
  291. 10:52wasn't a reporter. He was he was there
  292. 10:55to take down an administration. Sound
  293. 10:56familiar? Here's Tucker Carlson wrapping
  294. 10:59it all up better than I could. But we're
  295. 11:01proud to contribute to all of this. Um
  296. 11:03and thank you Tulsi for being so honest
  297. 11:05with us.
  298. 11:06>> What's your take on a a Wolf Blitzer
  299. 11:08type? Because
  300. 11:12Whenever I
  301. 11:13>> just,
  302. 11:15you know, take a close look at his
  303. 11:17history.
  304. 11:18>> Actually,
  305. 11:18>> I'm always like, why would he do this?
  306. 11:21Why would he say a bunch of stuff he
  307. 11:22doesn't believe or he must know is
  308. 11:24untrue? Like, what? He sat there as this
  309. 11:28sort of elder statesman of news and just
  310. 11:32sort of lied right through through COVID
  311. 11:34and and many other subjects. Why would
  312. 11:36he do that? Why would he do it to his
  313. 11:38legacy?
  314. 11:40Um, you know, I worked with Wolf for
  315. 11:42years. Never had a problem with him. Um,
  316. 11:45it was always nice. Uh,
  317. 11:49you know, that no one wants to hear it.
  318. 11:51I'm sure most people won't believe it,
  319. 11:52but I can tell you, having lived it for
  320. 11:54many years, it's true. Uh, the intel
  321. 11:56agencies have a big effect on what is
  322. 11:58broadcast on television and what you see
  323. 12:00on Facebook and Google as well. I mean,
  324. 12:02they're all up and down Facebook and
  325. 12:04Google, as I'm sure you know. And um you
  326. 12:08know there are a lot of anchors who
  327. 12:10including
  328. 12:12people I know well and have worked with
  329. 12:14at different networks. I'm thinking of
  330. 12:16one in particular national security
  331. 12:18reporter who was just a mouthpiece for
  332. 12:20the Pentagon and the CIA and is
  333. 12:23knowingly telling lies on their behalf.
  334. 12:25That's very very common. Very common.
  335. 12:27And I can think of a number of people at
  336. 12:28CNN who I know for a fact are doing that
  337. 12:30exact thing. And so I mean they're
  338. 12:34reading government propaganda from the
  339. 12:36intel agencies knowingly and I'm sure
  340. 12:38they've got some internal rationale that
  341. 12:40allows them to get up in the morning and
  342. 12:42face themselves despite having done
  343. 12:43something that dishonest. But I'm just
  344. 12:45telling you bottom line I know that is a
  345. 12:47that is true. I'm not speculating at
  346. 12:49all. Um, and in particular on the
  347. 12:52national security stuff, there are very
  348. 12:55well-known national security reporters,
  349. 12:57and I'm thinking of one female national
  350. 12:59security reporter in particular, who
  351. 13:02just reads lies from the national
  352. 13:06security state. And it's wildly
  353. 13:09frustrating and it would just make me
  354. 13:11mad. I mean, even if I don't agree with
  355. 13:12the lies, okay, but even if I did agree
  356. 13:14with the lies, I would be offended
  357. 13:16because they're lies. They're lies. Like
  358. 13:19when the you know when CIA and the
  359. 13:21Pentagon were claiming that Bashar
  360. 13:23al-Assad used poison gas against his own
  361. 13:26people. Okay, there was there was no
  362. 13:28evidence that was true. I mean maybe it
  363. 13:30was true. There was no evidence it was
  364. 13:32true. None. Zero. And I called them out
  365. 13:35and they could not provide any evidence.
  366. 13:37And yet every national security and it
  367. 13:39was a big deal. I mean we killed a lot
  368. 13:40of people in response. We sent in
  369. 13:42missiles and killed a lot of people. We
  370. 13:44took human life in response to that
  371. 13:46claim. And it was, as far as I can tell,
  372. 13:49a lie. And every national security
  373. 13:52reporter, every channel repeated it
  374. 13:54uncritically. The B administration blew
  375. 13:56up Nordstream and, you know, created the
  376. 13:59largest act of industrial sabotage in
  377. 14:01history, the largest man-made CO2
  378. 14:03emission in history in environmental
  379. 14:05crime. This is a huge deal this
  380. 14:06happened. And every national security
  381. 14:08reporter just looked right into the
  382. 14:09camera and said, "Well, we think Russia
  383. 14:10did it." Well, they knew Russia didn't
  384. 14:11do it. That's a lie. And they knew it
  385. 14:12was a lie. So, I I just think, and
  386. 14:15again, I'm not speculating. I spent my
  387. 14:17life in this business, so I've seen it.
  388. 14:19People underestimate the degree to which
  389. 14:21the people sitting on the news, possibly
  390. 14:23even Wolf Blitzer, are are repeating
  391. 14:28talking points from the intel agencies
  392. 14:30and doing it on purpose. It's scary,
  393. 14:32man. Really scary.
  394. 14:36[Music]

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of I Asked DNI Tulsi Gabbard About The CIA's 'Operation Mockingbird' Her Honest Answer SHOCKS Internet… by Benny Johnson, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,424 words across 394 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.