How To Get Free Backlinks in 2026 (Methods That Actually Work) — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00This link building thread was going
- 0:01viral on the SEO subreddit last month.
- 0:04There is a lot of good stuff in it if
- 0:06you are looking to build backlinks
- 0:08without spending money, without paying
- 0:10for the links. The post is, "How are you
- 0:13guys building backlinks after Google
- 0:15officially said random and low-quality
- 0:17backlinks are useless. If I want real
- 0:19authentic links, I have to pay. I'm
- 0:21stuck with a backlink building." By user
- 0:24zealous ideal sky 632. "I'm an SEO
- 0:28analyst and one of the main
- 0:30responsibilities is backlink building.
- 0:32Recently after reading Google's official
- 0:34guidance that low-quality unrelated
- 0:36backlinks, like random blog submissions,
- 0:39directory submissions, bookmark sites,
- 0:41etc. don't provide value anymore, I
- 0:44completely stopped building those kinds
- 0:46of links. Now I'm stuck. Whenever I try
- 0:49to build genuine relevant backlinks,
- 0:51almost every website owner asks for
- 0:53payment. Very few are willing to link
- 0:56for free. So I'm confused. If I build
- 0:59random backlinks, it feels like a waste
- 1:01of time. If I focus on high-quality
- 1:03relevant backlinks, most opportunities
- 1:05are paid. How are you all handling this
- 1:08in 2026?" So this thread got so many
- 1:11comments, so many votes, I had to dig
- 1:14through so many awful AI comments, and
- 1:17actually a lot of my favorite comments
- 1:19were buried at the bottom because they
- 1:21were posted later. So I'm reading a
- 1:22bunch of comments, my favorite ones,
- 1:24some of them will be out of order in
- 1:26which they appeared cuz I went through
- 1:28everything for you and then I organized
- 1:30it by my favorites. The top one was from
- 1:33aromatic pineapple, who said, "For a
- 1:35LockTech client of mine whose target
- 1:38audience was hospitals, I took a
- 1:40research-first approach." And this is
- 1:42actually going to be a recurring theme
- 1:45in this thread, is what this person is
- 1:47sharing. So this person says, "I ran
- 1:49surveys, analyzed multiple research
- 1:51papers, interviewed hospital staff, and
- 1:54studied publicly available data. Based
- 1:56on all of that, I prepared a detailed
- 1:58article on how hospitals lose revenue. I
- 2:01shared it with a friend who works at a
- 2:03leading newspaper in South India. He
- 2:05liked it and published it in the
- 2:06technology column. After that, Medical
- 2:08Buyer Nirmitee and several other
- 2:11industry publications picked it up and
- 2:13republished it. We got free mentions and
- 2:15a high-quality backlinks from a leading
- 2:17newspaper without any outreach budget.
- 2:20This is what I would suggest. Create
- 2:21something unique and worth reading.
- 2:23Publish original research, reveal
- 2:25surprising statistics, present insights
- 2:28people haven't seen before. Then
- 2:29proactively reach out to relevant
- 2:31publications. Research with original
- 2:33data gets picked up naturally is what I
- 2:36observed. And it doesn't even have to be
- 2:38your data. This is from commenter
- 2:40valuable_win,
- 2:42who said, "First grab all the easy
- 2:44backlinks like local citations and
- 2:46social media profiles for your business.
- 2:48This is called foundational backlinks,
- 2:50by the way. Then next take some time to
- 2:52understand what your audience wants.
- 2:54Start developing content for those
- 2:56things. Try to reverse engineer it by
- 2:59asking what a website would link to in
- 3:01my industry or what you would link to in
- 3:03an article. Data stories are great. You
- 3:05don't even need to use your own data.
- 3:08Plenty of free data sources like Yelp
- 3:10Trends and government census data to
- 3:13help get you started. Here's an example.
- 3:15We recently pulled data from the census
- 3:18about pests, think mice, and correlated
- 3:20that with population to get a home
- 3:22infestation score. We then ranked it by
- 3:25state and sent the report to local
- 3:27papers. Got a dozen or so free links
- 3:29from that for our home insulation
- 3:31client. This next post, you could tell
- 3:34that the poster used AI as an assistant
- 3:37to write it, but I still think that this
- 3:39post has unique data. So, I decided to
- 3:42include it anyway. As in like I actually
- 3:44think it's somebody with a unique
- 3:45experience who just used AI to help them
- 3:47write it. So, this person bestpoint8381
- 3:51said, "What I did instead of outreach,
- 3:53scrape an entire French sector, run a
- 3:56scripted audit on every site, publish
- 3:58the distribution. No survey, no
- 4:00interviews, nobody to email. 2,141
- 4:04training providers, then 3,111
- 4:07law firms, then 5,568
- 4:10home services companies, then 5,706
- 4:14tourism businesses. Roughly two days of
- 4:16work per sector once the scraper
- 4:18existed. Anyone writing about that
- 4:20sector needs a number to cite, and there
- 4:22isn't one, so they use mine. Same
- 4:25mechanism inside AI answers. A stat with
- 4:28a sample size and a date gets quoted.
- 4:31The requirements are lower than people
- 4:32assume. Public data, one metric people
- 4:35argue about. That's really smart. One
- 4:37metric that people argue about. Find
- 4:39something that people argue about
- 4:41because that shows that they care. And
- 4:42an honest methodology section that says
- 4:45what you did not measure. Mine excludes
- 4:47measured visibility entirely and says
- 4:50so, and that paragraph is a reason
- 4:52people trust the rest of the numbers.
- 4:54So, be transparent. Nobody has audited
- 4:56your niche at n equals 3,000. That gap
- 5:00is your link asset." Yeah, I like that
- 5:02post, too. This next one is from SEO
- 5:03Pub. SEO Pub, Mike Friedman, he's been
- 5:06on the podcast before. He's really
- 5:07great. He said, "Directories are not
- 5:10random." So, directories, I think of
- 5:12directories as foundational backlinks.
- 5:14If you're a real business, you probably
- 5:16are going to put yourself in a lot of
- 5:17relevant directories. You're going to
- 5:19try to find relevant directories. And
- 5:20I've seen this many, many times. So,
- 5:23with this new business that I'm funding,
- 5:25we used boostbenchmark.com. That's my
- 5:27affiliate link for a list of directories
- 5:29that I really like. We used that, put
- 5:31ourselves in all the directories on that
- 5:33list, and then our rankings improved
- 5:35immediately. They improved immediately
- 5:37because these are relevant, indexed, not
- 5:40small, random BS. It's the type of
- 5:42places that an actual business would put
- 5:45themselves. So, directories are not
- 5:47random. Then, SEO Pub says, "If you want
- 5:50to consistently build links, you are
- 5:52probably going to have to pay for them,
- 5:53no big deal, or creating linkable assets
- 5:56are another good method. With AI these
- 5:59days, it is so easy to build quizzes,
- 6:01tools, or other interactive elements on
- 6:03a site." Actually, I have a great
- 6:05episode on this, episode 1037 of this
- 6:08podcast, how one simple website got
- 6:11384,000
- 6:13backlinks, linkable assets explained.
- 6:15And basically, I share all these
- 6:17examples of viral linkable assets that
- 6:20were so successful, no link building
- 6:23budget could recreate that. And then, I
- 6:25share a formula that you can use to
- 6:27ideate your own linkable assets. So, I
- 6:30highly recommend that episode. This
- 6:32comment is from Old Occasion 9380,
- 6:35who said, "Start close to home. Do your
- 6:38firm's partners, vendors, and customers
- 6:40already link to them to highlight the
- 6:42relationship? Are there awards or
- 6:44badging programs you could initiate that
- 6:47would encourage linking? Could be as
- 6:48simple as naming the best uses {slash}
- 6:51applications of your product and
- 6:53showcasing them, giving the winners HTML
- 6:55badges to showcase their award? Does
- 6:58your client have some information that's
- 7:00relevant in their local community where
- 7:02they could offer Q&A content to a
- 7:04newspaper, like Ask the Gardener with a
- 7:07site? These, along with the quote and
- 7:09content ideas above, work well for both
- 7:12SEO and AI citations." I want to add
- 7:14goodwill link building, doing good
- 7:16things for people and then asking for
- 7:18the link for the companies and
- 7:20organizations you do good things for.
- 7:22And giving anonymous tips to newspapers
- 7:25about the good thing that you did,
- 7:26because newspapers love sharing
- 7:28feel-good stories. I have an entire
- 7:30episode on that from a couple days ago,
- 7:32episode 1155
- 7:35of the podcast, he donated a free roof
- 7:38and got links you can't buy. That is
- 7:40That will give you tons of ideas. I have
- 7:42ideas in that for e-commerce, SaaS, and
- 7:44local services, and you will love that
- 7:46episode. This next comment by Mobile
- 7:49Reveal 8938
- 7:51is on why a lot of people over
- 7:54prioritize backlinks, which they do. You
- 7:57don't need a million backlinks to rank.
- 7:59This is what you need. So, this person
- 8:01says, "I've seen very few comments that
- 8:04mention paid backlinks aren't organic
- 8:06backlinks, and Google/Bing will ignore
- 8:08them at the least de-list sites at the
- 8:11most extreme. It's pretty simple. If you
- 8:13pay for it, it isn't organic. And
- 8:15eventually, the search engines will
- 8:17figure it out, and you are out the money
- 8:19spent. I'd suggest stop trying to game
- 8:21the system. Like a casino, it isn't your
- 8:24system, and it's not even your game. And
- 8:27on top of that, the house always wins in
- 8:29the end." First of all, that is amazing.
- 8:31I really agree with that. Backlinks are
- 8:33important and might have up to 1/3 the
- 8:35weight among ranking signals, but an
- 8:38equal weight goes to the metrics content
- 8:40quality/relevance/uniqueness.
- 8:43Another large percentage is the on-page
- 8:45experience. You might get away with
- 8:47buying backlinks, but if the other
- 8:49ranking factors are so-so, you are
- 8:51probably twisting yourself into a
- 8:53pretzel finding target search queries
- 8:56that show improved ranking. Or, you are
- 8:58using target queries that rely more on
- 9:01local SEO and your Google Business
- 9:03Listing than content-based SEO. I've
- 9:05been in SEO for over 20 years going back
- 9:08to when link farms and article spinning
- 9:10was a real thing. I've seen my white hat
- 9:12turn black after Google updates and had
- 9:15to repair the errors the newly
- 9:17blacklisted tactics created. Today, our
- 9:19SEO work is based on content and page
- 9:22audits, competitor content analysis, and
- 9:24analytics trends. We win organic search
- 9:27more often and get paid more per page.
- 9:29We leverage the other 2/3 of ranking
- 9:32signals. So, the other 2/3 are
- 9:34relevance, as in have a target keyword,
- 9:37put it in your page title, URL slug, H1,
- 9:40beginning of your first sentence, meta
- 9:41description is optional, and behavioral
- 9:43signals. Have page titles people want to
- 9:45click. Give the answer right away so
- 9:47they don't immediately pogo stick and go
- 9:49back to the search results to look for
- 9:51something better. I ran a poll on X
- 9:53recently. I said, "Out of this list,
- 9:56what's the most important Google ranking
- 9:58factor? User signals, relevance, or
- 10:00authority?" The winner of this 157 votes
- 10:03was authority, but my opinion is it's
- 10:06user signals, then relevance, then
- 10:08authority. And I've been saying this for
- 10:10a long time. People really over index on
- 10:12the importance of authority. Authority
- 10:14is important, but if you have a site
- 10:16with a lot of authority and terrible
- 10:17user signals, it's not going to matter
- 10:19and you're going to get de-indexed. Or a
- 10:21page with high relevance can very easily
- 10:24beat a page with high authority and very
- 10:26little relevance. So, I agree with what
- 10:28Mobile Reveal 8938
- 10:31said in the comment. This is from
- 10:33Redditor 7 26378
- 10:36who said, "I rank numbers 1 through 5
- 10:39for 200 plus keywords and never bought a
- 10:41backlink or made an effort with the
- 10:43exception of digital PR/press posts."
- 10:46Just a simple comment on how a lot of
- 10:48people over index on the importance of
- 10:51backlinks. Backlinks are important,
- 10:52especially if you're a new site or if
- 10:54you're going after the most competitive
- 10:56terms, but a lot of people don't need to
- 10:58do that. You don't need to go after the
- 11:00most competitive terms. Most people
- 11:02actually overlook the most competitive
- 11:05keywords and don't even know how to
- 11:07optimize for keywords properly in the
- 11:09way that I described a couple minutes
- 11:11ago. Expert quotes, got to mention it.
- 11:14This is from commenter November Sky 18
- 11:17who said, "I'd recommend some sort of
- 11:19digital PR. You actually don't need to
- 11:21pay for it if you sign up for services
- 11:23like HARO or Quoted. Just be really
- 11:26quick in responding and please don't use
- 11:28AI generated answers when pitching
- 11:30journalists unless you want to get
- 11:31banned. You can also use sources sources
- 11:34and connectively, which was previously
- 11:36called featured. And the last comment
- 11:38I'll share is from Gavelist, who said
- 11:41and said this about these low-quality
- 11:43paid backlinks. Not useless. They will
- 11:46actively tank your geo. I audited a
- 11:49company that was doing crappy backlinks
- 11:51from their previous SEO firm. They had a
- 11:53beautiful geo build, whatever that
- 11:55means, but they had a set of about 20
- 11:58paid for backlinks that AI rightfully
- 12:00flagged as misleading, paid for or fake.
- 12:03Their AI visibility should have been
- 12:05over 50% of queries. They were showing
- 12:08up at less than 6%. You'd have to ask
- 12:11their name in the question to AI to have
- 12:13them show up. It's probably more
- 12:15advantageous to the client to actively
- 12:18remove their backlinks if they are crap
- 12:20quality. So, I took this to mean that
- 12:22doing test due diligence on this company
- 12:25with AI, the AI was calling out these
- 12:28suspicious mentions in the form of these
- 12:31paid backlinks. Could also be that this
- 12:33person was just using AI to help do the
- 12:36SEO audit. When I read this the first
- 12:38time, I took it to mean the AI was
- 12:40saying this company is suspicious
- 12:42because of these low-quality looking,
- 12:44spammy-looking backlinks, which you
- 12:46absolutely see. I have seen in the
- 12:49thinking stage Claude saying filtering
- 12:52out SEO spam. So, it's absolutely
- 12:54possible. Anyway, you don't need to pay
- 12:56for backlinks. You want the foundational
- 12:58links, and then there are a million
- 13:01billion cool creative fun ways to get
- 13:04top websites or relevant websites, real
- 13:07websites, real businesses to link to
- 13:09you. And then, optimize for relevance,
- 13:11optimize for behavioral signals, and
- 13:14look for high-intent keywords that
- 13:17competitors aren't targeting. If you
- 13:18want to save years learning how to
- 13:21identify these keywords, and then how to
- 13:23find them, the high-intent keywords that
- 13:25competitors aren't targeting, I have an
- 13:27SEO course on this, Compact Keywords. It
- 13:29shows you how to find searches with real
- 13:32buying intent, where the person on the
- 13:33end of the search is looking to buy
- 13:35something, use something, or make a
- 13:37discovery call. And I show you how to
- 13:39find these searches, target them with
- 13:41conversion-based SEO landing pages,
- 13:43structure your site for these pages, do
- 13:45an SEO technical audit, more strategies
- 13:47for building links, examples in every
- 13:49niche, and so much more. There's so much
- 13:52in this course. If you haven't checked
- 13:53it out yet, check it out. Please, you
- 13:55will really like it. You can get it at
- 13:56compactkeywords.com,
- 13:58and that's everything that I got for you
- 14:00on this episode of the show. This
- 14:01episode 1,160
- 14:04of the podcast, 1,160
- 14:06days in a row doing this show. If you
- 14:08watch this on YouTube, thank you so much
- 14:10for watching. If you listened on Spotify
- 14:12or Apple Podcasts, thank you so much for
- 14:14listening. And I will talk to you again
- 14:16tomorrow. Bye now.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of How To Get Free Backlinks in 2026 (Methods That Actually Work) by Edward Sturm, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 2,454 words across 378 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.