How the Media Became a Propaganda Machine | Sharyl Attkisson — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00Sheryl, thanks for joining us. Really
- 0:01appreciate it.
- 0:02Great to be here. Thanks, Sean.
- 0:05So,
- 0:06I just
- 0:08I got to get your take on how
- 0:10these riots in LA are being covered.
- 0:34Because
- 0:35the last
- 0:37several years plus
- 0:40have not been good for media trust. And
- 0:44you've worked, you know, at place like
- 0:46CBS. You've been around. You obviously
- 0:49have the show now, very successful.
- 0:51When you see the coverage, the way it is
- 0:54now
- 0:55where they continue after everything
- 0:57that we've seen, the the Russia hoax,
- 0:59we're going to get into a lot of the
- 1:00health care stuff that we dealt with
- 1:02with COVID. Um but just I I can't
- 1:05believe that folks in the media don't at
- 1:08some point say, "All right, we we've got
- 1:10to be a little bit more straight." And I
- 1:12keep hearing about peaceful protest.
- 1:14We're watching cars get burned. We're
- 1:15watching reporters' stuff get burned and
- 1:17smashed. And yet
- 1:19like there's no sense of like shame.
- 1:24Well, the industry, my industry as you
- 1:26know has changed dramatically in the
- 1:27course of the last 20 years. I like to
- 1:30say as I've written that any form of
- 1:32communication that can be co-opted by
- 1:34propagandists has been. And that of
- 1:37course includes the news media which has
- 1:38undergone this radical transformation.
- 1:41So, I think you have people reporting
- 1:43who are no longer if they ever were, I
- 1:46think we we used to do a pretty good job
- 1:48at being neutral observers of facts and
- 1:50things like that. And that's just not
- 1:52the case anymore at many news
- 1:53organizations. I think reporters are
- 1:55rewarded for taking a particular
- 1:58viewpoint. When I left CBS ahead of my
- 2:00contract, part of that was because many
- 2:03of us felt like, not just me, we were
- 2:05being told to take a certain viewpoint
- 2:07in a story ahead of even gathering the
- 2:09facts or even researching the story. And
- 2:13when the facts didn't come out the way
- 2:14certain supervisors wanted them to come
- 2:16out, they either wanted you to change
- 2:18the story in a way that was dishonest
- 2:20sometimes or they didn't want to air the
- 2:22story at all if you insisted on being
- 2:24factually accurate. So, I know there's
- 2:26got to be an element of that going on at
- 2:28news organizations.
- 2:30And it's funny cuz that's actually was
- 2:32exactly how what I was going to ask you
- 2:33next. Like, so if you're a reporter out
- 2:35there
- 2:36and you're writing about mostly peaceful
- 2:37protest, is that because you, the
- 2:40reporter, do you think
- 2:42believes in that narrative or do you
- 2:44think that you're either pleasing your
- 2:45boss at headquarters or corporate or
- 2:49they're telling you to do that?
- 2:51Well, it could be either one.
- 2:53Um, certainly they reporters are being
- 2:55dictated to in some instances how they
- 2:58should term things as if it's the
- 3:00responsible thing to do. Be sure and
- 3:03point out mostly peaceful or they may be
- 3:05told that from a certain supervisors in
- 3:08New York, for example, and they don't
- 3:09really have a choice if that's the
- 3:10direction they've been given unless they
- 3:12want to quit or just simply say as I
- 3:14tried to do occasionally, that's not
- 3:16factually accurate. You need to try to
- 3:18make your case. Um, but then you're
- 3:20likely to be pulled from the story if
- 3:21somebody really wants a particular
- 3:23narrative out and you're not going to
- 3:24fulfill it. So,
- 3:26that's the problem with today's news
- 3:27coverage.
- 3:29There was this clip that I played
- 3:31earlier in the week. I want to play it
- 3:32for you from an ABC News affiliate about
- 3:35what was happening there and I want to
- 3:36just show it to you and and get you to
- 3:37react. Take a look.
- 3:38Large group of people, it could turn
- 3:40very volatile if you move law
- 3:42enforcement in there in the wrong way
- 3:44and turn what is just a bunch of people
- 3:46um having fun watching cars burn into um
- 3:49a massive confrontation and altercation
- 3:52between officers and and uh
- 3:55demonstrators.
- 3:56Now Now, Sheryl, I I don't know you well
- 3:59enough to know exactly what you do for
- 4:01fun. Um but I I don't know a ton of
- 4:04people who go out for fun to watch cars
- 4:07burn in public. So, I I was shocked by
- 4:10that narrative. The idea that they were
- 4:12saying, "Aside from people watching cars
- 4:14burn for fun."
- 4:16I don't I don't even understand that. I
- 4:18I
- 4:19It sounds like it was a live shot and
- 4:21maybe he regretted what he said pretty
- 4:23quickly after he said it or maybe
- 4:25someone told him later
- 4:26how crazy that sounded because I don't
- 4:28think even you know, whatever side
- 4:30you're on on these issues, I don't think
- 4:32that makes any sense.
- 4:34No.
- 4:34Um
- 4:35the other big Well, there's a couple big
- 4:37stories in the media and I before I get
- 4:38to to sort of
- 4:40big pharma and health care that I want
- 4:42to get you to to weigh in on. Obviously,
- 4:44the big one this week that that didn't
- 4:45get as much coverage as it probably
- 4:46should have is Terry Moran had started
- 4:48off the week um over at ABC News going
- 4:51on a
- 4:5212:06 Saturday night a.m. uh Twitter
- 4:56storm
- 4:57uh on Stephen Miller talking about that
- 4:59he eats hate and such.
- 5:01What I found fascinating about the
- 5:02story, though, is
- 5:04ABC said nothing. They literally said
- 5:07nothing all week. To this day, have not
- 5:10actually put out a statement or a tweet
- 5:12from ABC PR. They commented on Elon
- 5:15Musk's uh you know, the tweets that he
- 5:18put out. But how does a network like ABC
- 5:21get away with not even having to comment
- 5:23because
- 5:25what I found fascinating is it's not
- 5:26just that they didn't put anything out,
- 5:28but you would think that other media
- 5:30outlets would be calling them saying,
- 5:31"Do you have a comment on Terry Moran
- 5:33and what he said and whether it adheres
- 5:35to ABC news standards?" And yet, here we
- 5:38are 7 days later almost and nada.
- 5:42Well, I've been traveling, so I'm not up
- 5:44to date on all the latest news, but I
- 5:46think they did put out a statement and
- 5:47they said that they basically fired him
- 5:49or decided not to renew.
- 5:51What?
- 5:52Yeah, but but but here's they didn't put
- 5:53out a statement. Brian Stelter from CNN
- 5:57said that this is what's happening. It
- 5:59wasn't He sort of has a background
- 6:01source at ABC. So, you have a a quote
- 6:04media personality at CNN
- 6:07talking about what's happening, but ABC
- 6:09never issued an actual statement or
- 6:10anything. Brian Stelter at CNN says what
- 6:13ABC's going to do, which I think is a
- 6:15pretty weasely way of handling it.
- 6:17Well, that is interesting and you know,
- 6:19I noticed one thing when I tried to read
- 6:21some a little more of the coverage about
- 6:23that because
- 6:25a lot of news anchors and reporters have
- 6:27made similar statements if not worse
- 6:29with impunity in recent years. So, I
- 6:31wondered what made ABC decide to take
- 6:33action.
- 6:34And if this is accurate what I read,
- 6:37they already had let his contract lapse
- 6:40and had not renewed him. They said that
- 6:42um in what I read, this basically tipped
- 6:45the scale. They decided not to renew
- 6:47him, but his contract had already
- 6:48lapsed. That's unusual in our in our
- 6:50industry. If they're going to keep you,
- 6:52they don't let your contract completely
- 6:53lapse. And it makes me wonder if Terry
- 6:56Moran didn't try to go out in a blaze of
- 6:59glory if he sensed that he was not going
- 7:01to be renewed at ABC. And you know,
- 7:03certainly his his profile raises to some
- 7:06degree if he's looking at a book or
- 7:07another job if he makes a stink over
- 7:10something like he did, which just didn't
- 7:12make a lot of sense why he did that.
- 7:15It's almost like he's going full Acosta.
- 7:16Like I have a feeling that next week he
- 7:18announces he's going to be on Substack.
- 7:20He's going to have his own podcast and
- 7:22he's going to be the real I mean, kind
- 7:23of like it was like he was pretending to
- 7:25be a journalist for decades and now he's
- 7:27going to say I can finally be the
- 7:28authentic Terry Moran. Kind of like how
- 7:30in a Jim Acosta's going out there on his
- 7:32own. Uh I so I I actually I love the
- 7:35theory cuz I think that's that's
- 7:36interesting. But but um
- 7:39Stephen Miller had initially responded
- 7:41to Terry Moran and basically said that,
- 7:44you know, this was typical of what most
- 7:47journalists think. And then Chuck Todd
- 7:49came after him and said, "It's so sad
- 7:51that this administration has no interest
- 7:53to try to bring the country together.
- 7:55They intentionally create division is
- 7:58how you win short-term and lo- lose
- 8:00long-term." Um a patriotic like they're
- 8:02basically saying, "Hey, this isn't
- 8:05actually
- 8:06um
- 8:07what
- 8:08what
- 8:09Chuck Todd's answer was, "Don't don't
- 8:11try to group us all into what Terry
- 8:13Moran did. It's an isolated incident."
- 8:15And Stephen Miller's basically like,
- 8:17"No, you're all the same. He just said
- 8:19the quiet part out loud." Do you think
- 8:21that like
- 8:22that Stephen had a point that this isn't
- 8:24just Terry Moran. He just got caught at
- 8:2612:06 a.m. probably after a couple pops
- 8:29saying what he believes. And Chuck got
- 8:31very defensive thinking, "Well, it's
- 8:32just a one-off. Like we most of us
- 8:34aren't like this."
- 8:36Well, the attack saying that most of us
- 8:38aren't like this was itself sort of in
- 8:40the same vein as the original, you know,
- 8:43accusation, wasn't it? And I think we
- 8:45have plenty of evidence that many in the
- 8:47media do feel that way because some of
- 8:49them have made no secret of it and as I
- 8:51said have expressed these things with
- 8:53impunity. I'll even go a step further
- 8:55and say we've seen, as I tracked in
- 8:58recent years, so much misreporting
- 9:00factual errors on one side against
- 9:02Donald Trump and those who support him.
- 9:05And yet those reporters, there was a
- 9:07time I would say 15 years ago when you
- 9:09made major media mistakes like that that
- 9:12you'd lose your job. And instead
- 9:14reporters like Maggie Haberman at The
- 9:16New York Times and others, when they
- 9:18proved to be conflicted or biased or
- 9:20wrong with their anonymous sources,
- 9:23are continued to be promoted and given
- 9:25headline status. So I I think this is
- 9:27more than just a one-off with Terry
- 9:30Moran. I think we know that this is
- 9:32something that's grown pretty pervasive
- 9:34in the mainstream media.
- 9:36Uh the other big media story this week
- 9:38is the Associated Press
- 9:40had was ruled against by the courts. The
- 9:43currently now the White House can keep
- 9:45them from being in the the Oval Office
- 9:47or or Air Force One, but they can they
- 9:49have to be allowed into the big rooms,
- 9:50the East Room, etc.
- 9:52From a from your journalistic
- 9:54background, is the White House on the
- 9:56right side of this or is the AP?
- 9:59Well, I'm mixed on this issue because
- 10:01obviously as a journalist, I
- 10:03really tread lightly and think the
- 10:05government should do anything that
- 10:06limits journalists in any way. And if if
- 10:10I'm correct on this and Sean, you may
- 10:11know more, the fight the White House
- 10:14picked with AP was AP refusing to say
- 10:16Gulf of America
- 10:18when in fact I think there are many more
- 10:20substantive and important things to take
- 10:23beefs with over at AP which has become,
- 10:26you know, practically wholly owned by
- 10:28propagandists and those on the left and
- 10:30the pharmaceutical industry and so on.
- 10:32Um, I'm not sure that was the fight to
- 10:34pick over naming, you know, whether
- 10:37they're going to use a certain name for
- 10:38the Gulf of America. Um, so I'm I'm a
- 10:41little mixed on that. I do think we've
- 10:44put the administration and Donald Trump
- 10:46in particular in the position with so
- 10:48much misreporting and false reporting
- 10:50and bias that he's in the position of
- 10:52feeling as though if he doesn't do
- 10:55something there's nobody neutral who's
- 10:57going to stand up and do the right
- 10:58thing. So, he's taking actions and I
- 11:00covered this on my show Full Measure
- 11:02that appear to be clamping down free
- 11:05press, but even
- 11:07Frank Sesno, an analyst at George
- 11:09Washington University I interviewed
- 11:10said, you know, to the extent that this
- 11:13makes some in the media more careful
- 11:14about the mistakes they've made when
- 11:17Donald Trump is actually coming after
- 11:18them and winning some awards and
- 11:20settlements, that can be a good thing.
- 11:22If it goes too far and makes journalist
- 11:25chilled and fearful of doing accurate
- 11:27reporting on somebody, obviously that's
- 11:29not something I I I to see.
- 11:31What first of all, I love your show uh
- 11:33full measure. It's so like you the
- 11:35topics that you hit and the way that you
- 11:36cover them. I I just it's so missing in
- 11:39the um
- 11:40in the environment in the in the media
- 11:42landscape. And I I I love how you choose
- 11:44topics and then how you cover them. So,
- 11:47when you look at a story like this, what
- 11:49would be an example of
- 11:51clamping down on on on the First
- 11:53Amendment or on the press?
- 11:56Well, there's a question as to whether
- 11:57if if reporters begin to feel as though
- 12:00they have to curry favor with the
- 12:02administration in order to get ordinary
- 12:05access. Now, Donald Trump is so
- 12:07accessible, it's hard to argue that
- 12:08you're not getting access if you're kept
- 12:10out of a room. But in general, if
- 12:12reporters start to feel as though they
- 12:13curry favor to get access and that must
- 12:15be done or else you and your news news
- 12:18organization will be cut off from
- 12:20ordinary and routine access. That's
- 12:22something that could you know, that
- 12:24could be an unintended side effect or
- 12:27consequence of going after the media
- 12:29understandably for the things that
- 12:31they've done wrong. So, I guess I don't
- 12:33have a simple answer as to where I stand
- 12:36on all these issues, but
- 12:38No, no. And I think it's a fair point,
- 12:40but I would argue that if you think
- 12:41about what um
- 12:44what what Biden did by restricting
- 12:46conservative media and shutting out
- 12:48certain certain outlets versus say Trump
- 12:51to your point. I mean, think about how
- 12:52much how accessible he is, how many of
- 12:54those reporters are, you know, at the
- 12:56Marine One or in the Oval Office. I
- 12:59mean, you know, you look at the daily um
- 13:02pool report. You've got the Huffington
- 13:04Post.
- 13:06I I would argue that if you think about
- 13:07Trump, he's more transparent, more
- 13:09accessible than any president in
- 13:10history. Whereas Biden did more to
- 13:13restrict press access writ large and
- 13:16against one ideological side.
- 13:19Absolutely. I think you can't argue
- 13:21against the notion that Trump is the
- 13:23most accessible president that we've
- 13:25known certainly in my time. And so it
- 13:28makes it harder, I think, for AP to make
- 13:30the case that boy, if we are limited in
- 13:32certain ways, the the public suffers and
- 13:35we don't have access because there is so
- 13:37much access on a daily basis with this
- 13:40president and his administration.
- 13:42Yeah. All right, before I get into some
- 13:44of the the pharma healthcare maha stuff,
- 13:48there was a hearing today that I mean,
- 13:49excuse me, this week that I didn't hear
- 13:51a word about until I saw you
- 13:55give light to it.
- 13:56And it was a hearing that James Comer
- 13:58had in the Oversight Committee
- 14:01that I didn't even I mean, I literally
- 14:03until I saw Sharyl Attkisson post about
- 14:06it, I was like, I didn't know about
- 14:07this. And it was about 23andMe and
- 14:10potential privacy concerns.
- 14:12And and you wrote in your newsletter, he
- 14:14stressed that 23andMe and all companies
- 14:16handling genetic data must ensure that
- 14:19there's no legal or legal path for
- 14:20adversaries or hostile entities to
- 14:22exploit Americans' DNA. The committee,
- 14:25he said, will consider legislative
- 14:26solutions. And I think to myself, like
- 14:28in the military right now, you are not
- 14:31supposed to use 23andMe because the idea
- 14:34is we don't want our adversaries to have
- 14:36critical data on service members.
- 14:39And I I I was like, this is a big big
- 14:42deal. And it I I think the question to
- 14:44me is, explain why you think uh that
- 14:48this is so important for us to
- 14:49understand.
- 14:51Well, I have to dig into this more.
- 14:52We've covered this issue a bit on my TV
- 14:55show how China has gotten access, its
- 14:58foot in the door to so much that's may
- 15:00seem benign, but ultimately they're
- 15:02gathering grains of rice in their
- 15:04efforts, you know, that span 100 years
- 15:06to collect intelligence and to try to
- 15:08become dominant in so many ways. Um but
- 15:10I think the answer is to why you don't
- 15:13see many in the media picking up on what
- 15:15to the people is an obviously big and
- 15:17important story
- 15:19is this transformation I've spoken about
- 15:21in the media where
- 15:23it used to be that we didn't wait for
- 15:24someone to tell us what the story is. We
- 15:26didn't wait for propagandists or let's
- 15:28say websites and nonprofits and
- 15:30political figures to tell us what the
- 15:33marching orders are for the day. We went
- 15:35out, at least I did as an investigative
- 15:37reporter and I still do. I listen to
- 15:39people. I try to find great issues that
- 15:41matter to people and I'm I'm not taking
- 15:43my cues from what these organized forces
- 15:46would like us to report, but I can tell
- 15:48you many news organizations and many TV
- 15:51shows do exactly that. If this is not
- 15:54going to, for whatever reason, 23andMe
- 15:57or some other story serve a particular
- 15:59interest in the right way and they're
- 16:01not going to put it on the plate of
- 16:03those they contact in the news media
- 16:04every day. It's just not going to make
- 16:06it as into a position of prominence. So,
- 16:09I think those are super important
- 16:10stories and one of the most valuable
- 16:12things we can do is find those stories
- 16:14and still try to report them in a good
- 16:17and accurate way, especially these
- 16:18stories that mean these health stories
- 16:20as you mentioned that mean so much to so
- 16:22many people and impact so many people,
- 16:25but aren't giving getting the due
- 16:26coverage because they're not being put
- 16:29on the plate of the media every day as
- 16:31part of the daily diet.
- 16:37Well, if you enjoyed this content, make
- 16:39sure to like this video, subscribe, and
- 16:41click the notification bell to get more.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of How the Media Became a Propaganda Machine | Sharyl Attkisson by Sean Spicer, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,106 words across 466 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.