YouTube2Text

How the Media Became a Propaganda Machine | Sharyl Attkisson — Transcript

by Sean Spicer · 3,106 words · 466 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00Sheryl, thanks for joining us. Really
  2. 0:01appreciate it.
  3. 0:02Great to be here. Thanks, Sean.
  4. 0:05So,
  5. 0:06I just
  6. 0:08I got to get your take on how
  7. 0:10these riots in LA are being covered.
  8. 0:34Because
  9. 0:35the last
  10. 0:37several years plus
  11. 0:40have not been good for media trust. And
  12. 0:44you've worked, you know, at place like
  13. 0:46CBS. You've been around. You obviously
  14. 0:49have the show now, very successful.
  15. 0:51When you see the coverage, the way it is
  16. 0:54now
  17. 0:55where they continue after everything
  18. 0:57that we've seen, the the Russia hoax,
  19. 0:59we're going to get into a lot of the
  20. 1:00health care stuff that we dealt with
  21. 1:02with COVID. Um but just I I can't
  22. 1:05believe that folks in the media don't at
  23. 1:08some point say, "All right, we we've got
  24. 1:10to be a little bit more straight." And I
  25. 1:12keep hearing about peaceful protest.
  26. 1:14We're watching cars get burned. We're
  27. 1:15watching reporters' stuff get burned and
  28. 1:17smashed. And yet
  29. 1:19like there's no sense of like shame.
  30. 1:24Well, the industry, my industry as you
  31. 1:26know has changed dramatically in the
  32. 1:27course of the last 20 years. I like to
  33. 1:30say as I've written that any form of
  34. 1:32communication that can be co-opted by
  35. 1:34propagandists has been. And that of
  36. 1:37course includes the news media which has
  37. 1:38undergone this radical transformation.
  38. 1:41So, I think you have people reporting
  39. 1:43who are no longer if they ever were, I
  40. 1:46think we we used to do a pretty good job
  41. 1:48at being neutral observers of facts and
  42. 1:50things like that. And that's just not
  43. 1:52the case anymore at many news
  44. 1:53organizations. I think reporters are
  45. 1:55rewarded for taking a particular
  46. 1:58viewpoint. When I left CBS ahead of my
  47. 2:00contract, part of that was because many
  48. 2:03of us felt like, not just me, we were
  49. 2:05being told to take a certain viewpoint
  50. 2:07in a story ahead of even gathering the
  51. 2:09facts or even researching the story. And
  52. 2:13when the facts didn't come out the way
  53. 2:14certain supervisors wanted them to come
  54. 2:16out, they either wanted you to change
  55. 2:18the story in a way that was dishonest
  56. 2:20sometimes or they didn't want to air the
  57. 2:22story at all if you insisted on being
  58. 2:24factually accurate. So, I know there's
  59. 2:26got to be an element of that going on at
  60. 2:28news organizations.
  61. 2:30And it's funny cuz that's actually was
  62. 2:32exactly how what I was going to ask you
  63. 2:33next. Like, so if you're a reporter out
  64. 2:35there
  65. 2:36and you're writing about mostly peaceful
  66. 2:37protest, is that because you, the
  67. 2:40reporter, do you think
  68. 2:42believes in that narrative or do you
  69. 2:44think that you're either pleasing your
  70. 2:45boss at headquarters or corporate or
  71. 2:49they're telling you to do that?
  72. 2:51Well, it could be either one.
  73. 2:53Um, certainly they reporters are being
  74. 2:55dictated to in some instances how they
  75. 2:58should term things as if it's the
  76. 3:00responsible thing to do. Be sure and
  77. 3:03point out mostly peaceful or they may be
  78. 3:05told that from a certain supervisors in
  79. 3:08New York, for example, and they don't
  80. 3:09really have a choice if that's the
  81. 3:10direction they've been given unless they
  82. 3:12want to quit or just simply say as I
  83. 3:14tried to do occasionally, that's not
  84. 3:16factually accurate. You need to try to
  85. 3:18make your case. Um, but then you're
  86. 3:20likely to be pulled from the story if
  87. 3:21somebody really wants a particular
  88. 3:23narrative out and you're not going to
  89. 3:24fulfill it. So,
  90. 3:26that's the problem with today's news
  91. 3:27coverage.
  92. 3:29There was this clip that I played
  93. 3:31earlier in the week. I want to play it
  94. 3:32for you from an ABC News affiliate about
  95. 3:35what was happening there and I want to
  96. 3:36just show it to you and and get you to
  97. 3:37react. Take a look.
  98. 3:38Large group of people, it could turn
  99. 3:40very volatile if you move law
  100. 3:42enforcement in there in the wrong way
  101. 3:44and turn what is just a bunch of people
  102. 3:46um having fun watching cars burn into um
  103. 3:49a massive confrontation and altercation
  104. 3:52between officers and and uh
  105. 3:55demonstrators.
  106. 3:56Now Now, Sheryl, I I don't know you well
  107. 3:59enough to know exactly what you do for
  108. 4:01fun. Um but I I don't know a ton of
  109. 4:04people who go out for fun to watch cars
  110. 4:07burn in public. So, I I was shocked by
  111. 4:10that narrative. The idea that they were
  112. 4:12saying, "Aside from people watching cars
  113. 4:14burn for fun."
  114. 4:16I don't I don't even understand that. I
  115. 4:18I
  116. 4:19It sounds like it was a live shot and
  117. 4:21maybe he regretted what he said pretty
  118. 4:23quickly after he said it or maybe
  119. 4:25someone told him later
  120. 4:26how crazy that sounded because I don't
  121. 4:28think even you know, whatever side
  122. 4:30you're on on these issues, I don't think
  123. 4:32that makes any sense.
  124. 4:34No.
  125. 4:34Um
  126. 4:35the other big Well, there's a couple big
  127. 4:37stories in the media and I before I get
  128. 4:38to to sort of
  129. 4:40big pharma and health care that I want
  130. 4:42to get you to to weigh in on. Obviously,
  131. 4:44the big one this week that that didn't
  132. 4:45get as much coverage as it probably
  133. 4:46should have is Terry Moran had started
  134. 4:48off the week um over at ABC News going
  135. 4:51on a
  136. 4:5212:06 Saturday night a.m. uh Twitter
  137. 4:56storm
  138. 4:57uh on Stephen Miller talking about that
  139. 4:59he eats hate and such.
  140. 5:01What I found fascinating about the
  141. 5:02story, though, is
  142. 5:04ABC said nothing. They literally said
  143. 5:07nothing all week. To this day, have not
  144. 5:10actually put out a statement or a tweet
  145. 5:12from ABC PR. They commented on Elon
  146. 5:15Musk's uh you know, the tweets that he
  147. 5:18put out. But how does a network like ABC
  148. 5:21get away with not even having to comment
  149. 5:23because
  150. 5:25what I found fascinating is it's not
  151. 5:26just that they didn't put anything out,
  152. 5:28but you would think that other media
  153. 5:30outlets would be calling them saying,
  154. 5:31"Do you have a comment on Terry Moran
  155. 5:33and what he said and whether it adheres
  156. 5:35to ABC news standards?" And yet, here we
  157. 5:38are 7 days later almost and nada.
  158. 5:42Well, I've been traveling, so I'm not up
  159. 5:44to date on all the latest news, but I
  160. 5:46think they did put out a statement and
  161. 5:47they said that they basically fired him
  162. 5:49or decided not to renew.
  163. 5:51What?
  164. 5:52Yeah, but but but here's they didn't put
  165. 5:53out a statement. Brian Stelter from CNN
  166. 5:57said that this is what's happening. It
  167. 5:59wasn't He sort of has a background
  168. 6:01source at ABC. So, you have a a quote
  169. 6:04media personality at CNN
  170. 6:07talking about what's happening, but ABC
  171. 6:09never issued an actual statement or
  172. 6:10anything. Brian Stelter at CNN says what
  173. 6:13ABC's going to do, which I think is a
  174. 6:15pretty weasely way of handling it.
  175. 6:17Well, that is interesting and you know,
  176. 6:19I noticed one thing when I tried to read
  177. 6:21some a little more of the coverage about
  178. 6:23that because
  179. 6:25a lot of news anchors and reporters have
  180. 6:27made similar statements if not worse
  181. 6:29with impunity in recent years. So, I
  182. 6:31wondered what made ABC decide to take
  183. 6:33action.
  184. 6:34And if this is accurate what I read,
  185. 6:37they already had let his contract lapse
  186. 6:40and had not renewed him. They said that
  187. 6:42um in what I read, this basically tipped
  188. 6:45the scale. They decided not to renew
  189. 6:47him, but his contract had already
  190. 6:48lapsed. That's unusual in our in our
  191. 6:50industry. If they're going to keep you,
  192. 6:52they don't let your contract completely
  193. 6:53lapse. And it makes me wonder if Terry
  194. 6:56Moran didn't try to go out in a blaze of
  195. 6:59glory if he sensed that he was not going
  196. 7:01to be renewed at ABC. And you know,
  197. 7:03certainly his his profile raises to some
  198. 7:06degree if he's looking at a book or
  199. 7:07another job if he makes a stink over
  200. 7:10something like he did, which just didn't
  201. 7:12make a lot of sense why he did that.
  202. 7:15It's almost like he's going full Acosta.
  203. 7:16Like I have a feeling that next week he
  204. 7:18announces he's going to be on Substack.
  205. 7:20He's going to have his own podcast and
  206. 7:22he's going to be the real I mean, kind
  207. 7:23of like it was like he was pretending to
  208. 7:25be a journalist for decades and now he's
  209. 7:27going to say I can finally be the
  210. 7:28authentic Terry Moran. Kind of like how
  211. 7:30in a Jim Acosta's going out there on his
  212. 7:32own. Uh I so I I actually I love the
  213. 7:35theory cuz I think that's that's
  214. 7:36interesting. But but um
  215. 7:39Stephen Miller had initially responded
  216. 7:41to Terry Moran and basically said that,
  217. 7:44you know, this was typical of what most
  218. 7:47journalists think. And then Chuck Todd
  219. 7:49came after him and said, "It's so sad
  220. 7:51that this administration has no interest
  221. 7:53to try to bring the country together.
  222. 7:55They intentionally create division is
  223. 7:58how you win short-term and lo- lose
  224. 8:00long-term." Um a patriotic like they're
  225. 8:02basically saying, "Hey, this isn't
  226. 8:05actually
  227. 8:06um
  228. 8:07what
  229. 8:08what
  230. 8:09Chuck Todd's answer was, "Don't don't
  231. 8:11try to group us all into what Terry
  232. 8:13Moran did. It's an isolated incident."
  233. 8:15And Stephen Miller's basically like,
  234. 8:17"No, you're all the same. He just said
  235. 8:19the quiet part out loud." Do you think
  236. 8:21that like
  237. 8:22that Stephen had a point that this isn't
  238. 8:24just Terry Moran. He just got caught at
  239. 8:2612:06 a.m. probably after a couple pops
  240. 8:29saying what he believes. And Chuck got
  241. 8:31very defensive thinking, "Well, it's
  242. 8:32just a one-off. Like we most of us
  243. 8:34aren't like this."
  244. 8:36Well, the attack saying that most of us
  245. 8:38aren't like this was itself sort of in
  246. 8:40the same vein as the original, you know,
  247. 8:43accusation, wasn't it? And I think we
  248. 8:45have plenty of evidence that many in the
  249. 8:47media do feel that way because some of
  250. 8:49them have made no secret of it and as I
  251. 8:51said have expressed these things with
  252. 8:53impunity. I'll even go a step further
  253. 8:55and say we've seen, as I tracked in
  254. 8:58recent years, so much misreporting
  255. 9:00factual errors on one side against
  256. 9:02Donald Trump and those who support him.
  257. 9:05And yet those reporters, there was a
  258. 9:07time I would say 15 years ago when you
  259. 9:09made major media mistakes like that that
  260. 9:12you'd lose your job. And instead
  261. 9:14reporters like Maggie Haberman at The
  262. 9:16New York Times and others, when they
  263. 9:18proved to be conflicted or biased or
  264. 9:20wrong with their anonymous sources,
  265. 9:23are continued to be promoted and given
  266. 9:25headline status. So I I think this is
  267. 9:27more than just a one-off with Terry
  268. 9:30Moran. I think we know that this is
  269. 9:32something that's grown pretty pervasive
  270. 9:34in the mainstream media.
  271. 9:36Uh the other big media story this week
  272. 9:38is the Associated Press
  273. 9:40had was ruled against by the courts. The
  274. 9:43currently now the White House can keep
  275. 9:45them from being in the the Oval Office
  276. 9:47or or Air Force One, but they can they
  277. 9:49have to be allowed into the big rooms,
  278. 9:50the East Room, etc.
  279. 9:52From a from your journalistic
  280. 9:54background, is the White House on the
  281. 9:56right side of this or is the AP?
  282. 9:59Well, I'm mixed on this issue because
  283. 10:01obviously as a journalist, I
  284. 10:03really tread lightly and think the
  285. 10:05government should do anything that
  286. 10:06limits journalists in any way. And if if
  287. 10:10I'm correct on this and Sean, you may
  288. 10:11know more, the fight the White House
  289. 10:14picked with AP was AP refusing to say
  290. 10:16Gulf of America
  291. 10:18when in fact I think there are many more
  292. 10:20substantive and important things to take
  293. 10:23beefs with over at AP which has become,
  294. 10:26you know, practically wholly owned by
  295. 10:28propagandists and those on the left and
  296. 10:30the pharmaceutical industry and so on.
  297. 10:32Um, I'm not sure that was the fight to
  298. 10:34pick over naming, you know, whether
  299. 10:37they're going to use a certain name for
  300. 10:38the Gulf of America. Um, so I'm I'm a
  301. 10:41little mixed on that. I do think we've
  302. 10:44put the administration and Donald Trump
  303. 10:46in particular in the position with so
  304. 10:48much misreporting and false reporting
  305. 10:50and bias that he's in the position of
  306. 10:52feeling as though if he doesn't do
  307. 10:55something there's nobody neutral who's
  308. 10:57going to stand up and do the right
  309. 10:58thing. So, he's taking actions and I
  310. 11:00covered this on my show Full Measure
  311. 11:02that appear to be clamping down free
  312. 11:05press, but even
  313. 11:07Frank Sesno, an analyst at George
  314. 11:09Washington University I interviewed
  315. 11:10said, you know, to the extent that this
  316. 11:13makes some in the media more careful
  317. 11:14about the mistakes they've made when
  318. 11:17Donald Trump is actually coming after
  319. 11:18them and winning some awards and
  320. 11:20settlements, that can be a good thing.
  321. 11:22If it goes too far and makes journalist
  322. 11:25chilled and fearful of doing accurate
  323. 11:27reporting on somebody, obviously that's
  324. 11:29not something I I I to see.
  325. 11:31What first of all, I love your show uh
  326. 11:33full measure. It's so like you the
  327. 11:35topics that you hit and the way that you
  328. 11:36cover them. I I just it's so missing in
  329. 11:39the um
  330. 11:40in the environment in the in the media
  331. 11:42landscape. And I I I love how you choose
  332. 11:44topics and then how you cover them. So,
  333. 11:47when you look at a story like this, what
  334. 11:49would be an example of
  335. 11:51clamping down on on on the First
  336. 11:53Amendment or on the press?
  337. 11:56Well, there's a question as to whether
  338. 11:57if if reporters begin to feel as though
  339. 12:00they have to curry favor with the
  340. 12:02administration in order to get ordinary
  341. 12:05access. Now, Donald Trump is so
  342. 12:07accessible, it's hard to argue that
  343. 12:08you're not getting access if you're kept
  344. 12:10out of a room. But in general, if
  345. 12:12reporters start to feel as though they
  346. 12:13curry favor to get access and that must
  347. 12:15be done or else you and your news news
  348. 12:18organization will be cut off from
  349. 12:20ordinary and routine access. That's
  350. 12:22something that could you know, that
  351. 12:24could be an unintended side effect or
  352. 12:27consequence of going after the media
  353. 12:29understandably for the things that
  354. 12:31they've done wrong. So, I guess I don't
  355. 12:33have a simple answer as to where I stand
  356. 12:36on all these issues, but
  357. 12:38No, no. And I think it's a fair point,
  358. 12:40but I would argue that if you think
  359. 12:41about what um
  360. 12:44what what Biden did by restricting
  361. 12:46conservative media and shutting out
  362. 12:48certain certain outlets versus say Trump
  363. 12:51to your point. I mean, think about how
  364. 12:52much how accessible he is, how many of
  365. 12:54those reporters are, you know, at the
  366. 12:56Marine One or in the Oval Office. I
  367. 12:59mean, you know, you look at the daily um
  368. 13:02pool report. You've got the Huffington
  369. 13:04Post.
  370. 13:06I I would argue that if you think about
  371. 13:07Trump, he's more transparent, more
  372. 13:09accessible than any president in
  373. 13:10history. Whereas Biden did more to
  374. 13:13restrict press access writ large and
  375. 13:16against one ideological side.
  376. 13:19Absolutely. I think you can't argue
  377. 13:21against the notion that Trump is the
  378. 13:23most accessible president that we've
  379. 13:25known certainly in my time. And so it
  380. 13:28makes it harder, I think, for AP to make
  381. 13:30the case that boy, if we are limited in
  382. 13:32certain ways, the the public suffers and
  383. 13:35we don't have access because there is so
  384. 13:37much access on a daily basis with this
  385. 13:40president and his administration.
  386. 13:42Yeah. All right, before I get into some
  387. 13:44of the the pharma healthcare maha stuff,
  388. 13:48there was a hearing today that I mean,
  389. 13:49excuse me, this week that I didn't hear
  390. 13:51a word about until I saw you
  391. 13:55give light to it.
  392. 13:56And it was a hearing that James Comer
  393. 13:58had in the Oversight Committee
  394. 14:01that I didn't even I mean, I literally
  395. 14:03until I saw Sharyl Attkisson post about
  396. 14:06it, I was like, I didn't know about
  397. 14:07this. And it was about 23andMe and
  398. 14:10potential privacy concerns.
  399. 14:12And and you wrote in your newsletter, he
  400. 14:14stressed that 23andMe and all companies
  401. 14:16handling genetic data must ensure that
  402. 14:19there's no legal or legal path for
  403. 14:20adversaries or hostile entities to
  404. 14:22exploit Americans' DNA. The committee,
  405. 14:25he said, will consider legislative
  406. 14:26solutions. And I think to myself, like
  407. 14:28in the military right now, you are not
  408. 14:31supposed to use 23andMe because the idea
  409. 14:34is we don't want our adversaries to have
  410. 14:36critical data on service members.
  411. 14:39And I I I was like, this is a big big
  412. 14:42deal. And it I I think the question to
  413. 14:44me is, explain why you think uh that
  414. 14:48this is so important for us to
  415. 14:49understand.
  416. 14:51Well, I have to dig into this more.
  417. 14:52We've covered this issue a bit on my TV
  418. 14:55show how China has gotten access, its
  419. 14:58foot in the door to so much that's may
  420. 15:00seem benign, but ultimately they're
  421. 15:02gathering grains of rice in their
  422. 15:04efforts, you know, that span 100 years
  423. 15:06to collect intelligence and to try to
  424. 15:08become dominant in so many ways. Um but
  425. 15:10I think the answer is to why you don't
  426. 15:13see many in the media picking up on what
  427. 15:15to the people is an obviously big and
  428. 15:17important story
  429. 15:19is this transformation I've spoken about
  430. 15:21in the media where
  431. 15:23it used to be that we didn't wait for
  432. 15:24someone to tell us what the story is. We
  433. 15:26didn't wait for propagandists or let's
  434. 15:28say websites and nonprofits and
  435. 15:30political figures to tell us what the
  436. 15:33marching orders are for the day. We went
  437. 15:35out, at least I did as an investigative
  438. 15:37reporter and I still do. I listen to
  439. 15:39people. I try to find great issues that
  440. 15:41matter to people and I'm I'm not taking
  441. 15:43my cues from what these organized forces
  442. 15:46would like us to report, but I can tell
  443. 15:48you many news organizations and many TV
  444. 15:51shows do exactly that. If this is not
  445. 15:54going to, for whatever reason, 23andMe
  446. 15:57or some other story serve a particular
  447. 15:59interest in the right way and they're
  448. 16:01not going to put it on the plate of
  449. 16:03those they contact in the news media
  450. 16:04every day. It's just not going to make
  451. 16:06it as into a position of prominence. So,
  452. 16:09I think those are super important
  453. 16:10stories and one of the most valuable
  454. 16:12things we can do is find those stories
  455. 16:14and still try to report them in a good
  456. 16:17and accurate way, especially these
  457. 16:18stories that mean these health stories
  458. 16:20as you mentioned that mean so much to so
  459. 16:22many people and impact so many people,
  460. 16:25but aren't giving getting the due
  461. 16:26coverage because they're not being put
  462. 16:29on the plate of the media every day as
  463. 16:31part of the daily diet.
  464. 16:37Well, if you enjoyed this content, make
  465. 16:39sure to like this video, subscribe, and
  466. 16:41click the notification bell to get more.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of How the Media Became a Propaganda Machine | Sharyl Attkisson by Sean Spicer, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 3,106 words across 466 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.