YT YouTube2Text

YouTube2Text → Transcripts → How People Got Jacked From 1900 To Today

How People Got Jacked From 1900 To Today — Transcript

by The Jeff Nippard Podcast · 30,741 words · 4,640 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Open in transcriber Summarize with AI Download SRT/VTT

Full transcript

0:00So, at the very birth of our modern
0:02fitness industry, you have a genetically
0:04blessed bodybuilder willingly selling
0:06something to his client base around the
0:08world that he knows doesn't truly match
0:12up.
0:12>> Wow. And this is so fascinating. I feel
0:14like most people know of Eugene Sandow
0:17as like the father of all this stuff
0:19that we're doing, right? Like he was
0:20like the first jacked guy, like the
0:22first ripped guy, right? And even the
0:24Mr. Olympia trophy to this day is named
0:26after him. I don't know how many people
0:29know him as a hustster if guys were able
0:31to look like that back then with the
0:33equipment that you described. What is
0:36all of this science actually for? Like
0:38what is it doing?
0:40>> Yeah. As a historian, I really do want
0:42your honest opinion on the social media
0:46era of fitness.
0:48>> Everything is wonderful. My captors are
0:50treating me very well.
0:53>> Connor Hefernan, thanks for coming on
0:54the podcast, man.
0:55>> Yeah. No, listen. It's a real pleasure.
0:56Thank you.
0:57>> So your area of research is really
0:59interesting. Could you just tell us a
1:01little bit about your PhD and what kind
1:03of work you do?
1:04>> I study the desire to look better naked.
1:07>> All right.
1:08>> That's it in one. So I study the history
1:09of fitness, the history of strength, the
1:10history of aesthetics for one of a
1:12better phrase. So my PhD and everything
1:14to this present day has been looking at
1:16how do men and women women lift weights?
1:18How long have they lifted weights for?
1:20How has that changed over time? And then
1:22how does that differ depending on if
1:23you're in the US or in Ireland or in
1:25Britain or in India? And a lot of the
1:27times you come back to kind of core
1:28fundamentals, which is what makes it
1:30quite interesting and fun.
1:32>> Okay, cool. Yeah, I I feel like it's
1:33such a unique area because like I I've
1:36spoke with so many people whose PhD is
1:38in fitness, but it's generally in like
1:40the science or medical side and not the
1:42history side. So is your is your area
1:45actually like under the history
1:46department or is it more still under
1:48like the kinesiology department? So
1:50historians don't respect me, but I
1:52respect I like me and that's the thing
1:53because I'm not doing French Revolution,
1:55right? So I'm in both. So when I taught
1:57in Texas and University of Texas Stack
2:00Center has a history and museum of
2:01fitness, I was in kinesiology and then
2:04if I'm in Ireland or England, I'm in a a
2:06history department or a sports
2:08department. So I'm kind of a mongrel who
2:09moves in between all those things, which
2:11makes sense because fitness bleeds into
2:14all of these different areas. So I think
2:16that's what makes it
2:18well makes me less respectable. Fair
2:20enough. Um, no, your your work is is
2:22super cool, like from from what I've
2:24seen. And you've published several
2:25books, too, right? Yeah. And it's all on
2:27this history of physical culture.
2:30>> Yeah. And this is where I say things
2:32start to look the same. So, my last
2:33book, When Fitness Went Global, looked
2:35at the 1800s and how did things like
2:37gymnastics become popular, dumbbells,
2:39barbells, how did people begin using the
2:41same workout system? So if you were in,
2:43you know, Boston, when did you start
2:45using the same workout system as someone
2:47in Dublin or someone in South Africa or
2:49someone in Chile? When did fitness
2:52become the same or kind of at least
2:54broadly similar? And then tangentally
2:56connected to that is what did that mean
2:58for people? So my next book project is
3:00looking at Olympic lifting for women in
3:02America in the 20th century and looking
3:04at what did it mean for a Judy Glenny or
3:07a Karen Marshall, two pioneering Olympic
3:09weightlifterss to do that sport. what
3:11did it mean for them themselves to build
3:12their bodies, to win medals, to break
3:14barriers. So, I'm interested in both the
3:16kind of personal story, but then the
3:18kind of broader structure of how we've
3:20gotten to this point in the fitness
3:21industry.
3:22>> So, how did you get into this kind of
3:24thing? Like, were you someone who was
3:25more interested in history and then you
3:28started to explore the fitness side of
3:29that or are you someone who was into
3:31bodybuilding and then you wanted to
3:32figure out the history of bodybuilding?
3:34>> I'm going to offend exercise scientists
3:36in Ireland here. So when I got into
3:38fitness, I was really interested in what
3:39you'd say is like evidence-based
3:41fitness, right?
3:42>> But there was no real popular sports
3:44science or exercise science people. And
3:46because I was doing a history degree at
3:48the time, I was like, well, if I can't
3:49get into the science side of it, I'll
3:51get into the history side of it. So my
3:52evidence-based practice as it was was
3:55looking at books from the 1910s, 20s,
3:5830s, 40s, 50s, 60s, all the way up to
3:59the present day and saying, "Right,
4:01well, how did they work out in 1960s
4:03America? Oh, I'm going to do a Vinscar 8
4:05by8 program. see what that looks like.
4:07Okay, now I want to build weight. I'm
4:08going to do 20 rep squats and go mad.
4:10So, I would go back into the history to
4:12inform my own training and my own
4:14nutrition
4:15>> because the time where I was in fitness,
4:18it was either kind of Joe Weider
4:19magazines, you know, like Muslim
4:20fitness, flex, men's health, things like
4:22that, or the big guy at the gym. Yeah.
4:25>> And the big guy at the gym was great.
4:26The magazines maybe not so great. And
4:28then I realized that I could just go
4:30back in time.
4:31>> So, that's what I did before I realized
4:33exercise science was a thing. That's
4:35really really interesting. See, it
4:37actually hasn't for me it hasn't been
4:38until recently that I've started to
4:40really look back and dig into this
4:41stuff. So, I would consider myself still
4:43like a newbie as far as the history side
4:46of this goes, which is actually exciting
4:48because I feel like there's so much for
4:49me to learn now. Um, so I recently did a
4:53video where I went back and looked at
4:55what I thought were the best physiques
4:56from each decade over the last hundred
4:59years. And what I found was the
5:01physiques from like the early 1900s and
5:04even late 1800s were incredible. Like I
5:08think a lot of people would be surprised
5:10at the level of muscular development
5:12that you saw back then because when you
5:14look at other sports like basketball for
5:16example, there is a night and day
5:18difference between what basketball
5:20players played like in the early 1900s
5:22versus what they play like now. It
5:24almost looks like a completely different
5:25game. But when you look at bodybuilders,
5:29especially in the natural realm, the
5:31guys in the early 1900s
5:34can hold their weight against some
5:36really good natural bodybuilders today.
5:38I feel like that's quite unique.
5:40>> Yeah. And I think, you know, I was in
5:41the Canadian Hall of Fame for ice hockey
5:43yesterday and like looking at the masks
5:45from like the 1970s versus now like
5:47sports evolve and when you look at say
5:49Eugene Sandeo who's the first modern
5:51physique star, Arnold Schwarzenegger has
5:53a statue of Sandeo in one of his many
5:54homes. You can see like they're lean,
5:56they're muscular, they're athletic,
5:58they're very strong. Someone like Arthur
6:00Saxon who did a bent press record that
6:01lasted, you know, for a century. They're
6:03very extraordinary for one of a better
6:06phrase. But I think what people need to
6:08remember is when you look back at those
6:09physiques, they're the freaks. And I
6:11mean, you know, right, and I mean that
6:12from like a place of love and respect
6:14for them, but they're the people who
6:15would really be outstanding in any
6:18generation. The things that are
6:20different is the exercises that they
6:22use, the equipment that they had access
6:23to, and then what you need to do is look
6:25at the broader base. So when you look at
6:27Eugen Sande, you could say, "Oh my god,
6:29you know, like I'd love to look like
6:31that guy."
6:32>> But Sande would look be that guy in the
6:341950s, the 1980s, the 2020s,
6:36>> it's the broader base, I think, which
6:38has changed so much. So the basketball
6:40analogy is actually spot on,
6:41>> but we're looking at the the individual
6:44superstars, whereas the average man or
6:46woman was quite slender, uh quite
6:48scrawny, sometimes realistically,
6:50carrying a lot of body fat, depending on
6:51who they were, and not particularly
6:53strong in in comparison to our modern
6:55>> very true
6:56>> standards. So when you look at how
6:58fitness has evolved, we've always had
6:59the freaks or the super responders or
7:02whatever you want to call them, but the
7:03the base
7:04>> Yeah.
7:05>> has risen so much in terms of people's
7:07strength, their expectations of
7:09strength, their physiques. So it's so
7:11inspiring, I think, to look at those
7:12physiques from the past, but then it's
7:14so heartening to see how more people
7:17have become bigger and stronger over
7:19time as things have evolved. That's
7:21actually a really good point because
7:22like yeah if we were to time travel and
7:23go back to like 1900 there would be like
7:25one Eugene Sandow whereas now with
7:28respect to him there are thousands if
7:31not millions of physiques like that
7:33across the globe. Right. So I I I
7:35actually agree with your point that like
7:37the yeah the
7:38>> the average physical culture enthusiast
7:41in 2026 is a lot more jacked than the
7:45average enthusiast would have been in
7:471900. Right. just because we have more
7:49information now essentially. Is that
7:50what you you'd say the difference is
7:51>> more information but just access to
7:53things. So if you think about the
7:55equipment, right? So if I'm Eugen Sando,
7:57it's you know 1870s Belgium where he
7:59would have trained under a man named
8:01Professor Aia. I'm lifting with probably
8:03fixed barbells. So you know I would have
8:05my 90 lb barbell then my next barbell
8:08would be 110 pounds and 150 pounds and
8:11180 pounds maybe if I'm lucky. It was
8:13hard for them to adjust the weights. So
8:14I have relatively fixed weights, kettle
8:16bells, dumbbells and some early machines
8:19kind of pulleys and different things but
8:20nothing like what we'd have today.
8:22>> So the equipment that we have you know
8:24now in like a planet fitness which is
8:26often you know reviled
8:28>> is light years ahead of what you would
8:30have had in the 1870s or 1880s. So the
8:32equipment has changed and but then it is
8:34knowledge of training protocols, it's
8:36access to nutrition, it's access to that
8:39knowledge itself. So there's so many
8:41reasons how and why things have changed,
8:42but also just standards have changed,
8:44right?
8:44>> So now we have set standards. Like if
8:46you're doing a bodybuilding show, you
8:48know that there's a certain symmetry
8:49that you need to hit, a certain leanness
8:51you need to hit, a certain muscularity
8:52you need to hit. If you're doing
8:53powerlifting or strong man, strong woman
8:55or Olympic lifting, there are certain
8:57standards that you need to meet.
8:59>> A 100 years ago, you didn't really have
9:01strength standards, per se, or physique
9:03standards, per se. They were figuring it
9:05out in real time. So, it's both the kind
9:08of logistics of fitness, but then the
9:10kind of philosophies or ideas around
9:11fitness as well.
9:13>> Yeah, that's really interesting because
9:14like one one thing that that I've heard
9:16and that I think has some legitimacy to
9:18it
9:19>> is that okay, listen, like if guys were
9:22able to look like that back then with
9:24the equipment that you described,
9:28what is all of this science actually
9:30for? Like, what is it doing?
9:34>> Your life is a lie. But I no but I think
9:36I think that like no but I think there
9:37is a kernel of truth to it in the sense
9:39that like
9:40>> these guys were able to build impressive
9:42physiques without any of that. So I
9:45think it is reasonable to question like
9:47what is the actual value of it then?
9:49Like is it is just like exercising and
9:51just like lifting some stuff and like
9:53just doing some hard work actually
9:54enough for the average person if people
9:56were able to look like that?
9:57>> I mean I'm 34 so I'm like you just move
10:00without pain. You're fine. I fair
10:03enough. I understand though where people
10:04are coming from right and there is
10:06obviously always a backlash against
10:07certain things but when you look at and
10:09I will go back to it because it's such
10:10an important point for people to realize
10:12Eugene Sandow you know John Grimmik Mr.
10:15America winner probably one of the best
10:17physiques in my opinion but that's
10:18preference you know Reg Park Arnold all
10:20of these people come from the same
10:22genetic cloth
10:23>> and like that is a really important
10:25thing for people to realize when you
10:26look at pre-steroid physiques and you
10:28say you know I want to look like that I
10:29understand getting inspiration from
10:31those things
10:32>> but these were people who are
10:33hyperresponders like again Sando if you
10:35read his book uh strength and how to
10:37obtain it published in 1897 you'll see
10:39that he his diet advice is everything in
10:42moderation I eat sweets I smoke cigars
10:45you know, I don't really monitor protein
10:47intake. His exercise advice is kind of
10:49like just go figure it out, you know,
10:51you'll be fine
10:53>> because for him that was fine, you know.
10:55And his contemporaries, Arthur Saxon,
10:57George Hacken Schmidt were very vocal
10:59about I was born strong.
11:01>> Yeah.
11:01>> I've always been strong, right?
11:03>> I've never been a weakling. I've always
11:05responded well to lifting weights.
11:06George Hackenmid in the 1940s wrote that
11:09he didn't see the value in training
11:10whatsoever. So he was a wrestler and a
11:13prototype physique star. He said, "Yeah,
11:15my training for wrestling was just
11:16wrestling people. My strength training
11:19was just doing strongman shows. I didn't
11:21train. I don't see the value in it."
11:23>> Yeah.
11:23>> So think think about that. You know what
11:25I mean? Where you have people who are so
11:27>> Yeah.
11:27>> genetically predisposed to muscle
11:29building that they can say, "Nah, your
11:31training doesn't hurt, you know, like
11:33just lift weights. You figure it out.
11:34You'll be fine."
11:35>> Yeah. I I think like uh one of the like
11:39one of the things someone could say
11:40though would be like okay like yeah we
11:43acknowledge that like genetics are a
11:45huge thing like that's true but like has
11:49science-based training actually raised
11:51the standard of what's actually
11:52achievable by much right
11:54>> and I think the answer is yes but the
11:58problem is it's been raised to an extent
12:00that the natural physiques now people
12:02just don't believe they're natural
12:03anymore right so they basic so people
12:05have basically online especially set the
12:07bar at whatever physique in the 1930s
12:10was the best is the best physique of all
12:12time. That's as good as you can get
12:13naturally. But if you were to actually
12:15look at the top natural pros today, like
12:16a Brian Dosta, right?
12:19>> They look way better than anybody looked
12:21in the 1930s, the problem is people
12:23don't believe that he's natural, right?
12:25So that that becomes that becomes a
12:27problem, right? Um so there there so
12:29there's that. And then I think the other
12:30thing is I think people still kind of
12:32like misconstrue what the purpose of
12:35science in fitness is. Um, and a lot of
12:38this is due to to social media and
12:40creators and this sort of thing where
12:41it's often marketed as this thing that
12:45will help you achieve optimal like if
12:48you're not doing this you won't be able
12:50to build a good physique or much less
12:52your best physique right whereas I think
12:54in reality what the science of fitness
12:55is trying to do is figure out what works
12:59what the key principles are and what
13:01things don't work and that you don't
13:03need to waste your time on right so it
13:04becomes much more of an efficiency thing
13:06rather than an optimization thing. But
13:08what tends to you know click on social
13:10media are the optimization things which
13:13does exist like some studies do try to
13:14figure out which is a little bit better
13:16than this other thing and oh can you get
13:18that extra 5% or whatever
13:20>> but so much of it is just trying to
13:23identify key fundamental principles and
13:25I think going back to what you said
13:27about sandout right in his book like
13:29sure he had some of those key
13:31fundamental principles like for one he
13:32had the genetics he was training at all
13:35>> he was chilled he probably didn't have a
13:36lot of stress right Or maybe not. I
13:38don't know. You You might know better
13:39than
13:39>> people diseases. We're quite bad.
13:40>> Okay. Fair enough. Okay. Either way,
13:42good genetics and training at all. Okay.
13:45The reason I said that is you said like,
13:46"H, smoke a little bit. Not a big deal.
13:48You can yada yada." Like he seemed like
13:51just based on that writing, more of a
13:52chill guy. But here's the interesting
13:54thing. What what I found, and I think it
13:56was Sand, you can correct me if I'm
13:57wrong, but one of his key principles was
14:00make sure that you really thoroughly
14:02chew your food. Okay? which is like,
14:05okay, I mean, not a terrible idea. Like,
14:08we don't want anybody to choke. Maybe
14:09it'll improve digestion a tiny bit, but
14:11like I wouldn't put that anywhere near
14:16>> the base of the pyramid, right? It's
14:17like we're talking about caloric intake,
14:20protein,
14:20>> chewing 15 times,
14:21>> right? Chewing 15. Right. Right. So, I
14:23think that like what the science has
14:25done over the last century is help us
14:28identify that okay, caloric intake is
14:30really important, protein intake is
14:32really important. How many times you
14:33chew your food, not super important, not
14:36not as important. Whereas, I think when
14:38you look back in history, you can see
14:40all of these things that people made a
14:41big fuss about that science essentially
14:43like showed was not actually a key
14:45player.
14:46>> Yeah.
14:46>> And there's three things going on when
14:48you say that, which I which I and I love
14:50I love this type of questioning. The
14:52first is when you look at people's
14:55disillusionment with you know science
14:57space lifting or natty or not or all
14:59these things online we have to
15:01acknowledge that fitness has always been
15:02full of shysters okay so Eugene Sando
15:04world's most perfect well specimen he
15:07sold dumbbells and we have some of them
15:08on the table there and he would tell
15:10people I built my body through heavy
15:12weight lifting but you don't need to do
15:14that because I and sand out at the time
15:16and say my scientific yes he would use
15:18that term system of physical culture
15:20means you do never you never have to
15:21lift a heavyweight.
15:22>> Interesting.
15:23>> He sold 5 pound dumbbells. He'd say if
15:25you squeeze the dumbbell as hard as you
15:27could, so you'd concentrate because
15:28you're squeezing. Okay.
15:29>> You could develop my physique and his
15:31books and his magazines and I have the
15:33instruction manual there would have
15:35illustrations of Sand's body and you
15:37could track your measurements against
15:38Sande. So, it's all very scientific. In
15:41the early 1900s,
15:41>> Grab that if you can. I want to see what
15:43this looks like.
15:44So, so what I'm holding right now is
15:47something I've never held before, but
15:49it's it's a dumbbell that has springs
15:51running through the middle.
15:53>> And so I guess he would just tell you to
15:55just literally like squeeze the handle
15:56of the dumbbell.
15:57>> And you would know that you're
15:58concentrating because when you squeeze
16:00the dumbbell, the spring grips go down.
16:01So if the spring grips are fully
16:03compressed, you're you're concentrating
16:05enough. And you would do your bicep
16:07curls, you do some lunges, you do some
16:08overhead presses with the dumbbells
16:10while squeeze the whole time.
16:12>> Don't let up. And this would build your
16:15sand out physique. Okay,
16:16>> that's insane. Okay, so for context,
16:18this dumbbell weighs probably about five
16:20pounds, maybe less.
16:21>> Yeah. And you're a strong guy, so you
16:22have all the spring grips in there. We
16:24were talking off air, you know, you
16:25would start off maybe three spring grips
16:27and then progressive overload.
16:28Obviously, you would add another and
16:29another, and you've now hit your
16:31strength standard for 1900s.
16:33>> Insane. So I mean like the reality is
16:35like there is there are very few people
16:38on the planet for whom this would be a
16:40sufficient enough stimulus for any
16:43muscle
16:44>> anything this is like a water bottle in
16:47my hand right
16:47>> and Sandown knew that and this is the
16:50key thing okay so he built his body
16:51using heavy barbells dumbbells kettle
16:53bells but he knew when he was selling
16:55these in the 1900s right people don't
16:57have access to that equipment first and
16:58foremost people are scared because heavy
17:01weight training is not the norm you know
17:03for a lot of people still not the norm
17:04where they don't want to p push
17:05themselves in terms of lifting heavier
17:07weights. So he said, "Well, you know,
17:08there's doctors saying that lifting
17:09heavy weights is dangerous. So I'm going
17:11to sell these." Oh, and also I'm selling
17:13these around the world. You could buy a
17:16sando dumb dumbbell like this in India,
17:18in South Africa, in Chile, in China, in
17:21Japan, in Europe, all over the world.
17:23But if I'm selling equipment all over
17:25the world, it needs to be light, right?
17:27So you have someone like Sande who said,
17:29"When I was measured by Dudley Allen
17:31Sergeant, a Harvard physical
17:32educationalist, he said I had the
17:34world's most perfectly developed body.
17:36using my patented premium blend,
17:40proprietary blend of fitness, I'm going
17:42to get you there faster,
17:44you know, easier and efficiently using
17:47my system. So, at the very birth of our
17:50modern fitness industry, you have a
17:52genetically blessed, you know,
17:54bodybuilder
17:56willingly selling something to his
17:58client base around the world that he
18:00knows doesn't truly match up. And now
18:03people then were very deconditioned like
18:06they were obviously had a much better
18:07like cardiovascular base in terms of
18:09they walked a lot more etc. But any sort
18:12of intervention would produce some
18:14stimulus, right? So the dumbbells,
18:16people say, "Oh, this looks great." You
18:18know, I feel much healthier. But you'd
18:19see their physiques because they'd be
18:21submitting photos to muscle magazines in
18:22the early 1900s and it wouldn't change a
18:24lot, you know, from year to year. But I
18:26think it's important for people to know
18:27that context of disillusionment because
18:29that repeats. You know, when you look at
18:32Joe Weider and Bob Hoffman and people
18:34who start selling supplements in 1950s
18:35and 1960s, they're using images of
18:38bodybuilders and weightlifters who have
18:40taken steroids, but they're saying, "No,
18:41no, no, no. He gained 20 pounds of
18:43muscle using my weight gain powder,
18:46>> you know, and it just the psycher
18:47piece." So, I understand why people get
18:49disillusioned. Yeah.
18:50>> Because there's a it's embedded. There's
18:52a history of disillusionment for some,
18:54not all. So I think that's an important
18:55piece. The second piece is people need
18:59to understand breath and depth when it
19:00comes to science.
19:02>> There has never been a point in human
19:03history where people have been this
19:04strong
19:05>> and that is just undeniable. And you can
19:07talk about genetic freaks etc.
19:09>> Both on an absolute scale and in terms
19:11of the average person like like you will
19:13walk into any LA Fitness, Good Life,
19:15what what have you and like see people
19:17squatting three plates, four plates per
19:19side. Like even 10 years ago when I was
19:23doing it, I would be the strongest guy
19:25in the gym doing 225 two maybe 315
19:28pounds. Like now
19:30>> there are like 12, 13 year olds doing
19:33that. You know, it's pretty insane.
19:35>> My generation 2, three, four.
19:36>> What's my strength standard? Two plate
19:38bench, three plate squad, four play
19:39deadlift. Two, three, four. High
19:41schoolers now are hitting that.
19:42>> But it's like frogs in a pot. You know
19:44where you you put the frogs in the
19:45boiling. I don't actually do this. It's
19:46a good metaphor. Frogs are in a pot. You
19:48start boiling the water. They don't
19:50realize until it's too late that they're
19:51being boiled to death. Again, it's a
19:52metaphor. It's not something that I do.
19:54Profess. But, you know, people don't
19:56realize how imperceptively strength
19:58standards have changed both at an
20:00absolute level. So, you know, a halfthor
20:02deadlift for example, but also like an
20:04LA, you know, a good life where you go
20:06in and there's people on the platform.
20:08So, people I think miss that. And then
20:09the final piece is more people are
20:12lifting weights. They're being exposed
20:13to weight training than ever before. So
20:15if we just think about the catchment of
20:18fitness. So if you're in high school
20:19now, chances are you're exposed to
20:21weight training in some way, shape or
20:22form because fitness has become more
20:24popular. You know, your parents or your
20:25grandparents or sibling may be
20:27introducing you to weightlifting or
20:28bodybuilding at an earlier age. So the
20:30general catchment area has increased.
20:32There's more access to gyms. There's
20:34more access to information. So when you
20:35look at, you know, a world natural
20:37bodybuilding competition and you see the
20:38winner, it's like, well, there's no way
20:40he's natural. It's like, well, no, there
20:41is because there's more people being
20:43exposed to it. And it's like, you know,
20:45the Bulgarian weightlifting system in
20:47the 1990s, they would say for every one
20:48athlete on the platform, there's 10,000
20:50bodies. Now, again, a metaphor, pro, not
20:52killing weightlifters. But, you know,
20:54for that one person to win a gold medal,
20:57we literally put 10,000 athletes into
20:59the meat grinder and we just see who
21:01comes out at the end.
21:02>> Yeah.
21:02>> And that's what's happening as well. So
21:04I understand the disillusionment, the
21:07disenfranchisement, the suspicion
21:09because some people are genuinely
21:10continuing that long history and
21:11tradition dating back to Sandow.
21:13>> But we also need to understand that the
21:15base the floor has increased and because
21:17that's increased there there are more
21:19people reaching previously, you know,
21:22unthinkable levels of leanness or
21:23muscularity
21:25>> in the same ecosphere that some people
21:27are the liver king, you know. So, it's
21:28truth. It is tricky and and ever since
21:31steroids got introduced,
21:34>> we will never know who it is. Like, it's
21:36it's an unanswerable question, which is
21:38why like
21:39>> as of late, I don't even I'm not even
21:42entertaining it anymore because like no
21:45one can know with any level of certainty
21:47unless they literally fail a drug test
21:49or admit to using steroids who is and
21:51who isn't. Right. So, prior to Yeah. So,
21:54prior to 19 prior to 19 what 40 45
21:58something like this, we can know with
21:59like
22:00>> virtually 100% certainty that no one was
22:03on steroids because testosterone hadn't
22:04been isolated until the mid-30s or
22:06something. Um, but after that,
22:09>> it's always going to be an open
22:10question. Like you you can never know
22:12for certain, right? Um, so it's it's
22:14probably just not even worth looking at.
22:15But I I do agree with you that like um
22:19when you look at the pool like it's it's
22:21it's just math. Like there are going to
22:23be some absolute freaks out there. And
22:26then
22:27>> even even if you were to take some of
22:29those guys in the 20s and 30s and like
22:31>> put them under some good lighting, diet
22:33them down a little bit, give them a peak
22:35week,
22:36>> they're like 90% of the internet would
22:38say they're not natty too in today's
22:40setting, right? Give them a good camera,
22:41good lighting, teach them to pose a
22:43little bit better, shred them down.
22:45>> They're going to look not natty. If you
22:47look at Bobby Pandor, who's a 1890s
22:50physical culturist, not as famous as
22:51Sando, but was kind of seen by like the
22:53sickos, you know, as a Sando equivalent.
22:56Again, good lighting, like insanely
22:57shredded. Yeah.
22:58>> Like, so you could play around with
23:00that. But also like people need to
23:01realize, so even
23:03>> Bob Peoples, one of my favorite strength
23:04athletes of all time, 1940s, he I think
23:07he pulled like 700 lb in a deadlift.
23:09When he trained for that, he had a
23:10wooden barbell on his Tennessee farm.
23:13There were wooden baskets on either end
23:15of the barbell. He would go to the
23:16quarry, get a rock, put it into his
23:18barbell. He then pulled on a barbell
23:21which had no slack whatsoever, was using
23:24oneinch plates and was probably about 5
23:25to six feet in diameter. Pulled 700 lb.
23:29>> Put that in our modern gym environment.
23:33And again, he's pulling, you know,
23:35probably,000 pound like, you know, we
23:37can't obviously extrapolate, but like if
23:39he could do that, then what would he do
23:40now?
23:40>> Yeah. So again, this is where the kind
23:42of comparison points can sometimes get a
23:44bit squirly because it's like, well,
23:45that's that's the only thing that I can
23:47achieve. It's like, well, no, because
23:48you exist in a different world
23:51>> to them. Both in terms of the training
23:53that you can do, the access to
23:54knowledge, but also like our equipment
23:56is easier.
23:57>> Yeah.
23:58>> You like if I if I have a deadlift bar,
23:59it's not easy pulling like four or 500
24:01lb on deadlift bar,
24:03>> but it's made to move, right?
24:05>> Like there's slack. It's going to move
24:06with me. There's little rings that I can
24:08put my fingers on for standardization.
24:10So, it's lovely to have comparisons. I
24:13think it's wonderful for people to look
24:14at the past because that's what I do
24:15obviously for a living.
24:17>> But we always need context. And the
24:18internet isn't great on nuance or
24:21context. I don't know if you know this,
24:22but the internet isn't great on nuance
24:24nuance or context.
24:25>> Yeah, this this is why I want to do the
24:26podcast, right? Because we can get into
24:27some of this stuff at at length. Um, was
24:30was Sandal rich? Did he get rich off of
24:32this this freaking thing?
24:33>> He was the world's first modern physique
24:35star, but also the world's most
24:36successful and profitable fitness
24:39entrepreneur. Wow.
24:40>> Before you'd say Arnold Schwarzenegger.
24:41So Sandow was the first modern fitness
24:45industry in and of himself. You look at
24:47Sando, he sold books, he sold magazines,
24:49he did tours around the world, he did
24:50medical speaking tours. In 1907, he
24:53opened up a curative institute of
24:54physical culture in London where you
24:56would come to him to be cured of
24:58illnesses and diseases including cancer
25:00with a 99% success rate.
25:02>> Oh no,
25:03>> that's not true. But he told people it
25:04was a 99% success rate. and he even had
25:07doctors working for him in that center.
25:09He sold supplements. He sold children's
25:11toys. He sold children's corsets. He was
25:13in one of the first uh films ever
25:15recorded by Thomas Edison in the late
25:171890s. So, he was incredibly wealthy,
25:20incredibly rich. Now, he lost all of it
25:22in the first world war. You can feel bad
25:24for him, but he was also very ligious.
25:26He sued many of his rivals into poverty
25:30because he was a ruthless like he did so
25:32much for the general value of fitness.
25:35You know, he was arguably fitness's
25:37first leading light, but he was also
25:39like a stone cold capitalist as well.
25:41So, he was incredibly wealthy. He owned
25:43multiple properties. His name was known
25:45around the world, but he was ruthless in
25:48terms of protecting that image.
25:50>> Wow. And this is so fascinating because
25:52like that is such a an interesting
25:56figure. Yet, I feel like his legacy is
25:58is overall positive. I mean, I feel like
26:00I feel like most people know of Eugene
26:02Sandow as like the father of all this
26:05stuff that we're doing, right? Like he
26:06was like the first jacked guy, like the
26:08first ripped guy, right? And even the
26:10Mr. Olympia trophy to this day is named
26:12after him. I don't know how many people
26:15know him as a Huster, which he was. I
26:18mean, like claiming to like be able to
26:19cure cancer and like knowingly selling
26:23bunk training gear, like
26:26>> pretty bad. It's quite terrible.
26:30>> It's ying and yang, right? There's all
26:31the positives, but then there's the
26:33negatives as well because I think he was
26:35given access
26:36>> in a way that no one had been given
26:38access before. And he he did believe in
26:40the value of fitness for people. He
26:42tried to bring his own training system
26:44into schools. He tried to bring into the
26:46military. He tried to get Britain to
26:48have its own kind of Ministry of Health
26:49before that was really a widespread or
26:51popular idea. So there was so much of
26:54value to Sandra. But he's also, you
26:57know, a businessman, right? You know,
26:58and you know, to quote Jay-Z, I'm not a
27:00businessman. I'm a businessman, you
27:02know. So Sandow is trying to do that.
27:04And I think
27:05>> we we shouldn't, you know, it's hate the
27:07sin, not the sinner. So I think Sande
27:09was able to do that because people
27:10wanted him
27:11>> to be able to do that. And when you look
27:13at, you know, his curative institute of
27:14physical culture, it was such a new
27:17idea.
27:18>> And doctors weren't taught the value of
27:20exercising. They weren't taught the
27:21value of nutrition at that point. Sand
27:23would give medical talks to doctors
27:25about how to build a physique like this.
27:26He would strip down afterwards. They
27:28would look at his body, you know, check
27:29his heart rate, check the muscle
27:31density, etc. So there was a real value
27:34in this. So if you have the medical
27:36profession like literally coming to you
27:38and saying teach us, I could understand
27:40the ways in which you would see yourself
27:42as someone who could answer these
27:44things. So I think the balancing of all
27:46of the good he did and even the Mr.
27:48Olympia Trophy that's modeled on
27:50Sandow's bodybuilding show from 1901,
27:52>> you know. So, the longevity is there.
27:54The influence is there. But you take the
27:56other side of it because that's fitness.
27:58It's good and bad. It's altruistic and
28:01capitalist. It's helping people while
28:02also taking something from their
28:04pockets. Not in the round, but I think
28:06we need to be
28:07>> open to all all the avenues of fitness
28:09whether we like them or not. And Sandai
28:11is a really good example of that because
28:12he was really great for fitness. Yeah,
28:15>> he was an ass, but he was really great
28:16for fitness at the same time.
28:18>> True. Yeah, it's incredible. I mean,
28:20like just just to circle back to this
28:21one more time, like I think an
28:23underappreciated thing that science does
28:26and has done is that if you were to take
28:28this freaking thing, I mean, there are
28:30there are shake weights that exist. So,
28:32I guess people do fall for this, but
28:33like if you were to plop this on social
28:35media,
28:36>> 99% of the fitness industry would be
28:39like, "This is complete bullshit." Like
28:41even even if I was to take this and and
28:43be like, "Guys, got this new thing. It's
28:45called a 5B dumbbell with springs in it
28:47and this is how I built this right now
28:50for
28:52um Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um this is how I
28:54built my physique. This is how you're
28:55going to build your physique." People
28:57are going to say,
28:58>> "I know that's not true because you need
28:59to train close to failure." Like most
29:01people are going to know that at this
29:02point and like that weight is way too
29:03light and that is complete And
29:05why do we know that now? Well, it's
29:07because of the evolution of the
29:08knowledge base over time. It's because
29:10of scientific development
29:12>> and connected to that which is something
29:13again social media nuance context but
29:16like most exercise scientists or like
29:19evidence-based practitioners lift and
29:20right that's actually a really important
29:22thing to to talk about because if you
29:24look at maybe some of the origins of
29:26modern evidence-based practice you could
29:28look at Thomas Delarm who helped
29:29popularized the 3x10 method he was a
29:32early exercise scientist who trained
29:34using Bob Hoffman's weightlifting
29:36courses in the 1930s in the 1940s he's
29:38working with US veterans, a lot of them
29:41who've damaged their knees and their
29:42their spines through parachuting,
29:44through jumping out of planes. So, he
29:46used the weightlifting methods that he
29:48learned from Bob Hoffman to rebuild
29:51soldiers, you know, their leg muscles in
29:53particular and increased their
29:54hypertrophy, etc. because he married and
29:56Jan Todd and Terry Todd have a great
29:58article on this, but he married his
30:00personal observations, you know, his N
30:01of one for a better phrase with the kind
30:04of scientific method. And there are very
30:06rarely people who are pushing science
30:09who aren't also lifters, right? And I
30:11think it's because sometimes people
30:12like, oh, you know, we have the hardcore
30:14side over here, the train hard side and
30:15the science side. Like I don't really
30:18see that
30:19>> in reality because what I see is a lot
30:21of people who kind of come to science
30:24after lifting.
30:25>> Yeah.
30:26>> Rather than come to lifting after
30:27science. Now there's some famous
30:28examples of people who have done that.
30:29But in the round, it's people who know,
30:32you know, and if you look at a lot of
30:33evidence-based uh people, sounds like
30:35I'm I'm shilling big evidence here, but
30:37anyway, but most of them aren't like
30:39don't train hard.
30:40>> Yeah.
30:40>> Most of them aren't like don't squat or
30:42like, you know, or they're like, oh, you
30:43know, we need to do a certain way that's
30:45completely counterintuitive to what has
30:47been done for the last 30, 40, 50 years.
30:49You don't really see that because there
30:52is a marrying of personal experience
30:54with science. And that's why people can
30:57say, "Well, that doesn't work cuz I know
30:58that doesn't work cuz if I go to a gym
31:00and I just lift a 5B dumbbell for the
31:02rest of my life, I'm going to stagnate
31:03pretty quickly."
31:04>> Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. No, I think I
31:05think that's true. I think there is this
31:06false dichotomy where people think like,
31:08oh, on the one hand, you have people who
31:09like have learned in the trenches from
31:12people over the decades, and then on the
31:13other hand, you have people who only
31:14want to look at the scientific
31:15literature, and they're just looking at
31:17numbers and data. And it's like, in the
31:18real world, I think most people use some
31:21combination of both, whether knowingly
31:23or not. Like many of my training
31:26decisions are informed by what my
31:28coaches have told me, what their coach
31:30has told them, what's been handed down
31:31and then a lot of it is also informed by
31:34the scientific evidence, especially when
31:36it comes to like the key principles of
31:37what re I really need to focus focus on,
31:40right? Um, so yeah, I I don't know. I
31:42think it's like a
31:43>> I I I do think it's a another example of
31:46just like black and white thinking. Um
31:48>> because you look at someone like you
31:49know Mike Menser who's in vogue now
31:51again or even like Dorian Yates you know
31:52who's kind of a disciple of Menser and
31:55Arthur Jones like Mike Menser was
31:57talking about like rest periods pushing
31:59to failure he was talking about maximum
32:00efficiency minimum effective dose Dorian
32:03Yates like he called his system like
32:04blood and guts you know if you look at
32:06that DV but then when you talk to him or
32:08or you listen to him or you go to any of
32:10his seminars a lot of it is like okay so
32:11we need to get the most effective you
32:13know like the most effective set blah
32:14blah but people just see Dorian in the
32:16Birmingham underground gym screaming and
32:19lift. It's like,
32:20>> no, he was actually a really thoughtful
32:22like dude in terms of how he set this up
32:24because there isn't a strict split.
32:27>> Yeah. No, agree. And and so much of it
32:29is just optics and vibes. So, it's like
32:32you could look at a branch war training
32:34with like,
32:36>> you know, full sweat in in like the most
32:39rugged gym you've ever seen in Texas
32:41and, you know, he's just throwing the
32:44weight around. the plates are clanging.
32:46He could in and sometimes does stop with
32:50like at least five, six reps in reserve,
32:52which again I think is totally fine, but
32:54like it's just weight being thrown and
32:55then it's racked. You know what I mean?
32:57And like people will perceive that as
32:59like the hardest possible training
33:02because of the environment, because of
33:05the optics and the aesthetics of it.
33:06Whereas, if you see someone who is using
33:08like good technique in a polished gym
33:11and they don't have the rugged look,
33:12like maybe they look a little bit more
33:14like a nerd and they have the glasses
33:15on, like they're even if they go to zero
33:19RI and like on an objective level are
33:21training harder than he was on that set.
33:23Again, I'm not saying Branchart Warren
33:24didn't train hard. He obviously freaking
33:26did. But I'm sure there was an example
33:28where he didn't push a set all the way
33:30to failure, right? I've seen them. Um,
33:31and the person with the glasses in the
33:34pristine training environment is going
33:36to be perceived as training less hard.
33:38Um, so I think I don't know.
33:40>> But no,
33:40>> I think I think that's a lot of what
33:41drives those those kind of like
33:45identifiers
33:47>> are just simply the way the person looks
33:50and where they're lifting,
33:51>> right? And like Diamond Gym has come
33:53about, you know, a lot in the last year
33:55and it seems like a really nice
33:56community of people in sense of looking
33:58out for each other. But it's funny
33:59because people like that's hardcore
34:00training. Like clearly they're pushing
34:02themselves. It's like but like what are
34:04they doing? It's like progressive
34:05overload, you know, coming back again
34:07and again, you know, like maybe not
34:08managing rest what I've seen from some
34:10things they say.
34:11>> Like the basic tenants are there. So
34:13then what is okay, well then they're
34:14shouting a lot. There's a lot of
34:15grunting, you know, there's a lot of
34:16like macho male energy going on. Again,
34:18I actually really love the ethos that
34:20they have there.
34:21>> But it's like, okay, but then if I'm in
34:23clinical scientific, you know, gym,
34:26etc., M
34:26>> but I'm going all out with perfect form.
34:29It's like oh actually we're still
34:30sharing the same basic
34:31>> true
34:32>> tenants
34:32>> but just the backdrop has changed
34:34because again there's like different
34:35avenues in fitness and a really funny
34:37example because you mentioned Branch
34:39Warren and I'm legally obliged to say he
34:41fell off a horse in the generation Iron
34:43movie which is the funniest thing in the
34:44world. He's like I've never been injured
34:46and then he gets kicked off a horse. But
34:48I was in um Metrflex uh in Dallas where
34:51Branch and Ronnie Coleman trained and
34:53the owner there like it was such a
34:54wonderful experience. But they were
34:56talking about you know when Ronnie
34:58Coleman retired and Dorian or not Dorian
35:00Yates um Jay Cutler kind of takes the
35:01mantle but then Jay Cutler gets
35:03overthrown by Phil Heath and they'd say
35:05like we would look at Phil Heath
35:06training and we say he doesn't train
35:08hard, you know, he's not pushing
35:09himself. He's just using machines. But
35:11then the owner is really perceptive.
35:12He's like you know for all that we
35:13thought that that wasn't real training.
35:15Do you know what we called him? I was
35:16like no what? He goes Mr. Olympia do
35:18>> like so these are the things where it's
35:20like okay it's not what I do it's not
35:22how I train
35:24>> but when I look at the results or if I
35:26look at the basic tenants they're kind
35:27of the same so I think the beautiful
35:29thing about fitness is there's different
35:31>> tribes that you can join you can be in
35:32the hardcore gym spit and sawdust gym
35:34the ultra you know Equinox ultra posh
35:36you know uh looks gym
35:39>> like the basic tenants are the basic
35:40tenants regardless of how you get up the
35:42mountain top
35:43>> yeah okay so so let's go back through
35:45and and kind of maybe we can start at
35:47when this whole thing started and then
35:49I'd like for you to describe how the
35:51training style has changed over time.
35:54Okay. So, I'm going to kind of break
35:55this up into different eras. So, I know
35:57a big part of your work is identifying
36:00when physical culture and bodybuilding
36:02and fitness as we know it now kind of
36:05originated, right? Um, and from what I
36:07understand, it seems to be like
36:09something around like the late 1800s. Is
36:10that right? Yeah. Okay. What did what
36:13did bodybuilding and and training look
36:16like in the late 1800s?
36:18>> I told you five pound dumbbell. No. So
36:21five pound dumbbell is part of it. And
36:22genuinely when you look at exercise
36:24equipment in the 1880s, 1890s, early
36:261900s, it's a lot of people selling some
36:28variation of this dumbbell. Wow.
36:30>> Selling pulleys. So like early like
36:32cable machines front of our phrase kind
36:34of more like um a resistance band, you
36:36know, and you could hook it into your
36:37door frame and you could do pulling
36:39exercises. And then also strand pullers.
36:42So again, spring grips again. And you
36:43kind of there's a handle on each side
36:45and there's long springs and you pull
36:46them apart, right? Yes.
36:47>> Like old school. And then calisthenics
36:49and gymnastics. They were really big
36:51back then. You had early weightlifting
36:53culture. So the first international
36:55weightlifting competition is in London
36:57in the 1890s. Weightliftings at the
36:59Olympic Games in 1896. So there's
37:01smaller crowds, especially in Austria
37:03and Germany, who are lifting weights. So
37:05lifting heavy weights, heavy barbells,
37:07heavy dumbbells, heavy kettle bells. But
37:09again, the way they even loaded
37:11>> machinery was very different. So
37:13obviously we have um plate loaded
37:15equipment now. So you have a barbell,
37:17you put on 45 lbs, 35 lb, 10 pounds. See
37:19how I'm converting from kilos cuz I'm
37:21European.
37:22>> Ah
37:22>> yeah, there you go. Skill, right? But
37:24back then you would have globe
37:26equipment. So you'd have these big round
37:28look like soccer balls at the end of the
37:30barbell and you would use sand or shot
37:33or different like small grains that you
37:35would put into the globes to make them
37:37heavier. Gotcha.
37:38>> So the equipment that they would be
37:40training with was very different. And
37:41even how they express strength, mainly
37:44one-handed lifts. Yeah.
37:45>> So for I'm training in the 1890s, 1900s
37:48in a strength gym, it's more one hand
37:50press, bent press. Um it's mainly like
37:53even sometimes a one-handed squat and
37:55then you do your double-handed. So you
37:56do a barbell or a dumbbell. So it's
37:59quite rudimentary in in that period. And
38:01in terms of sets and reps and
38:03progression, it's not that like oft like
38:06like you know you said vibes like
38:07sometimes it is vibes like you have some
38:09weightlifting coaches. Ysef Salai in
38:11London for example ran a gym in PullM
38:13Street. There was a very famous uh
38:15Russian doctor/weight training coach
38:17whose name I'm not going to butcher
38:19began with K and an in I. That's about
38:20it.
38:21>> Yeah, as they do.
38:22>> As they do as they want. So there were
38:24some weightlifting coaches Seabbert in
38:26Germany as well but there wasn't really
38:28systems yet. There was more figuring it
38:30out as you went. along, but a lot of
38:31one-handed kind of bent stuff, you know,
38:34bent press or rotational work, that was
38:36kind of the strength standards alongside
38:38>> five dumbbells
38:39>> and like So, but I feel like this hadn't
38:42broken out into like any kind of
38:44mainstream awareness, right? Because if
38:46people were buying this, but then you
38:47had the I guess athletes and and
38:50wrestlers and gymnasts doing the
38:52actually effective training like that's
38:54what they were doing, but as I
38:56understand it, they were probably a
38:57pretty small group of people, right?
38:59Okay. And and and this is what you look
39:00at when you look at like I don't know
39:02Family Guy or a cartoon depiction of
39:05what old school lifter must Yeah. Yeah.
39:09And you have the big the round bulbous
39:11dumbbells and and that's actually what
39:13it was like. Huh.
39:13>> Yeah. Yeah. For sure. And it's not until
39:16>> really the 1920s 1930s that you start to
39:18see more systemized training.
39:20>> Okay.
39:20>> So 1939 for example is the first Mr.
39:23America show which is the first
39:24mainstream bodybuilding show in America.
39:26But in the 1920s, 1930s around the
39:28world, you start to see weightlifting
39:30becoming a more standardized sport.
39:31Okay. In the
39:32>> early describe describe weightlifting,
39:33is that with the barbell and the the
39:35snatch and the clean and jerk? Is it the
39:37same lifts or
39:38>> Yes, with with the small little
39:39asterisks. Little asterisk. No, but this
39:41is a great question because
39:42weightlifting is at the Olympics in
39:431896, 1904, and then I think again it's
39:46scheduled for 19 uh4 and 198 world war
39:50gets in the way of that. But before the
39:52first world war, 1914 to 1918,
39:55weightlifting is a mess, you know. So if
39:57I'm doing a competition in France, I'm
39:59using different rules to Germany. I'm
40:00using different rules to Italy and
40:02Britain. It's in the 1920s that a new
40:05weightlifting federation is founded. And
40:06they say that there's three lifts.
40:07>> Okay?
40:08>> There's the overhead press which has now
40:10been eliminated. It was eliminated in
40:121974. So military press, press overhead,
40:14you take it from the ground, you press
40:15it overhead. Okay? the clean and jerk,
40:17which people know, you know, you snatch
40:19it up to your clavicle and then you push
40:20overhead. And then the snatch, which is
40:22bringing the bar overhead without it
40:23touching your body.
40:24>> Yeah. Yeah.
40:25>> So, when weightlifting becomes a
40:27standardized sport, there's three lifts.
40:29Our holy trifecta,
40:30>> h I can say that because I'm Irish. Our
40:32holy trifecta, father, son, etc.,
40:35>> that's when people begin to take it more
40:36seriously because now it's in the
40:38Olympics, we have international
40:39competitions, and we're all using the
40:41same lifts. So in the 1920s,
40:43weightlifting is
40:44>> kind of your starting point in any
40:47strength-based or physique- based
40:48activity. So like when I got into
40:50lifting, bodybuilding was the most
40:52popular paradigm.
40:53>> If it was 10 years after that, it would
40:54have been powerlifting.
40:55>> Now I don't know, hierox, I don't know
40:57what kids do, you know, whatever. But in
40:59the 20s and 30s, you did Olympic
41:01weightlifting for everything.
41:02>> So even when bodybuilding shows began to
41:04come around, a lot of those early
41:06bodybuilders were Olympic
41:07weightlifterss. And even in the
41:08bodybuilding competitions, you would
41:09have to do an Olympic lift to show that
41:11you were really athletic because it was
41:13functional and physique. So when you're
41:15asking about the breakout and the
41:16systems, it's like the 1920s, 1930s when
41:18weightlifting becomes a sport in its own
41:20right. And bodybuilding starting to
41:22become a sport in its own right.
41:23Powerlifting isn't until the 1960s. And
41:26that changes the game as well in terms
41:27of training and equipment, etc. But like
41:29the 20s and 30s, that's kind of a key
41:32point when we start to see physiques,
41:34but also the systems that build them
41:36really evolve.
41:38>> Interesting. And back then, like in the
41:4120s, let's just say, when Olympic
41:42weightlifting started happening, like
41:44were were they lifting barbells like we
41:46as we know them today with like the
41:48loadable plates and this kind of thing.
41:50>> I love these questions. I just got to
41:51geek out. It's wonderful. Yes. Because
41:54in the early 1900s, you have a man
41:56called Alan Calvert. We actually have
41:57some of his books here. the truth about
41:58weightlifting. He had a company called
42:00Milo barbell. And he started off, and
42:03you can see the picture here, selling
42:05globe dumbbells and globe barbells, but
42:08over time the Milo company started to
42:10sell, you know, kind of plate loaded
42:12equipment. Sometimes it was still in the
42:14globe. So, you know, you'd have to
42:15unhook the globe and slide the plates
42:17on. But by the 20s and 30s, you're
42:19getting plate loaded barbells. Now,
42:21they're not really rotating. They're
42:23often 1-in plates, you know, so it's a
42:25more slender barbell, etc. Mhm.
42:27>> That changes in the 1930s when you have
42:29Bob Hoffman who creates York barbell.
42:31York barbell still exists obviously
42:33today. He starts to massproduce kind of
42:36more modern Olympic weightlifting
42:37equipment across the North America. In
42:40England you have PullM Sports doing
42:41something very similar and Thomas Inch
42:43before him. But the equipment is
42:45starting to look more
42:46>> recognizable to what we have today. And
42:48obviously Alica will come around in the
42:5050s and 60s and completely change the
42:51game.
42:52>> But it's starting to look more
42:53recognizable. And because you can load
42:55plates on, it's easier to get stronger
42:58>> because, you know, I'm not going to have
42:59to, okay, give me the, you know, the bag
43:01of sand. I'm going to pour it in. Are we
43:03at, you know, 220? No, it's 215. Okay,
43:05pour more in. It's standardized. So I,
43:07and if I can standardize my weights, I
43:10can start to plan in advance, you know.
43:12So, okay, we're starting off, you know,
43:14140 pounds. Okay, in six weeks time, I
43:16need to get to 170. You can start to
43:19work backwards because it's easier to
43:20standardize everything. So that's where
43:22the equipment is the same, not the same,
43:24but you know, more recognizable for us
43:26in 2026,
43:27>> but the systems begin to evolve around
43:29it as well.
43:30>> Okay. So it has been about a hundred
43:31years that we've had the barbell with
43:33plates on it.
43:34>> Yeah, give or take. That's a good
43:35metric.
43:35>> Um, now one of the other things I want
43:38to talk to you about is like what kind
43:39of exercises would they do? So you did
43:40talk about, you know, they were doing
43:41the they were doing the overhead press.
43:42Okay. Classic. Clean. I don't know many
43:45bodybuilders who do cleans anymore. That
43:46seems to be niche down in the in the
43:48Olympic side. um clean and jerk or sorry
43:51I said clean snatch mo bodybuilders are
43:54not doing snatch sometimes they'll do
43:55snatch grip shrugs or like snatch grip
43:58but like they're not doing the snatch
43:59they're not doing the clean and jerk um
44:01so what other like was that basically it
44:04because like I just pulled this book out
44:06and I'm seeing an image here of a gentle
44:09>> doing what's called the bent press now I
44:10have I have seen this but only because I
44:13have seen books like this I don't see
44:14anybody doing this exercise where you're
44:16like
44:17>> bent over to one died.
44:19>> Martine's license, the strongman did it
44:21for a little bit.
44:22>> Uh, true, true, true.
44:25>> In bodybuilding, no. Jesus.
44:26>> Yeah. In bodybuilding, I'm seeing zero.
44:28Zero. Literally zero.
44:29>> Um, so like, okay, let's let's think
44:32about like, okay, the 20s was, you know,
44:34a lot of Olympic lifting and this kind
44:36of thing. And then obviously a lot of 5B
44:37dumbbell junk probably still. Um, and
44:40then in the 30s, who who is who are a
44:42few people who like break out as like
44:44big bodybuilders? There are there a few
44:46names tip a tongue, but they're not
44:47coming to me right So John Grimick is
44:49John Grimick is who I was thinking
44:50about.
44:50>> He's the most famous and just an
44:52incredible physique but again an Olympic
44:53weightlifter you know. So he went to the
44:56Olympics with the US weightlifting team.
44:57So he cleaned he did snatches but then
44:59he would do bodybuilding exercises. But
45:01it's right, you're right to ask me about
45:03the bodybuilding exercises because Jeff,
45:05if nothing else comes of this, please,
45:08for the love of God, if I never again in
45:10my life see why did Bronze era lifters
45:12have such flat chest and then their
45:13response like, well, they thought big
45:14chests were feminine or, you know, they
45:16they didn't have bench presses. Okay, in
45:19the 1890s, 1900s, they didn't have a
45:20bench press. If you look even at a vid,
45:22there's a video online of Reg Park,
45:24Arnold Schwarzenegger's, you know, kind
45:26of idol doing a 500 pound bench press.
45:28He's lying flat on a bench. People
45:32deadlift the bar up to him so that he
45:34can then do his bench press. The squat
45:36st or the bench stands are very rare.
45:40>> Okay, if we look at the 1930s, they're
45:42doing a pullover and press a lot of the
45:43time. So, you're on the ground as
45:44pullover and floor press. But even you
45:46think about the like the back squat,
45:48people are squatting in the 20s and 30s,
45:50but squatting with a flat foot. Yeah,
45:52>> you you know what I'm about to talk
45:54about. Before the 1920s, when you
45:56squatted, it would be on your tippy
45:57toes. You'd probably be holding five,
45:59I'm not like fixated on them, but five
46:01pound dumbbells at your sides or you
46:02might have a light dumbbell or a barbell
46:04across your back, but you'd be squatting
46:06up on your tippy toes.
46:07>> Why? Why on your tippy toes?
46:08>> Because this is the convention from
46:09gymnastics and calisthenics. And they
46:11didn't have squat stands. So, a lot of
46:13early exercises were, well, what are the
46:16gymnasts doing?
46:17>> Okay, let's just load that in some way,
46:19shape, or form. You're right. When you
46:21talk about, you know, flipping it over
46:22where it's perpendicular to you onto
46:23your back. Milo Steinborn, a German
46:26immigrant to the US, helped to
46:27popularize that in the 20s and 30s where
46:29you would be standing and the barbell is
46:31standing directly beside you and then
46:33through physics and look, you would flip
46:35the barbell onto your back, but Milo
46:38squatted flatfooted so with your feet on
46:40the ground. Okay.
46:41>> And this is like, you know, that scene
46:42in Back to the Future where Marty hears
46:46like or is it Mark Barry here's Marty
46:48playing like the rock and roll music?
46:50Your kids are going to love it, right?
46:52But like that's kind of when Milo
46:54Steinborn squats flat foot, it's like,
46:55"Oh my god,
46:56>> we can now do this heavy. We can now
46:58lift heavy."
47:00>> So this back squat helps to bring a lot
47:02of breakout stars. And it's funny, a
47:05huge breakout star in the 1930s, isn't a
47:07bodybuilder by today's metrics, but it's
47:10a guy called JC Heis. So JC Heis is the
47:13original Goad plus 20 rep squat person.
47:17>> Explain what GoMad is, just in case
47:19they're not affiliated. So, if someone
47:20has never done the worst type of dirty
47:22bulking, uh, the gallon of milk a day.
47:24>> Gallon of milk a day. G O M A D.
47:26>> Yeah. Goat. In addition to what you're
47:28usually eating.
47:28>> Have you ever done goat?
47:29>> I did go. I did go. Yeah.
47:31>> I should do goat again.
47:32>> You shouldn't do gad.
47:34>> That's like a What kind of milk were you
47:36doing? Were you doing
47:37>> milk%? This isn't like a maha thing, but
47:40we we tend to do whole milk in Ireland.
47:42>> Really?
47:42>> Whole milk for Gomead?
47:44>> Yeah. Yeah.
47:44>> Oh, whole milk is nasty.
47:46>> That's why I say you do it one and done.
47:47That's why
47:48>> it's one and done. But
47:49>> it was fun though.
47:50>> It was fun while it lasted. I'm now 10
47:52years older than when that happened.
47:53>> So, but you have someone there's a
47:55fitness writer in the 1930s, Mark Bry,
47:57and he says the main ideal is huskiness.
48:00>> Wait, he did go in the 1930s.
48:02>> Yeah. Yeah.
48:03>> A gallon of milk a day in the 30s.
48:05>> He was a farm boy.
48:06>> Wow. I did not know that.
48:08>> So Mark Barry says, "Listen, don't mind
48:10about looking scrawny or lean. You want
48:12to look husky. So you want to look big
48:14and you know, etc." So he'd say, you
48:16know, eat to excess and do 20 rep
48:18squats.
48:19>> So JC Heis eats to excess, does 20 rep
48:22squats, sends photographs of himself, he
48:24gains 40 pounds in a month, sends
48:26photographs of himself to Mark Barry,
48:27and he becomes like the poster boy for a
48:30type of bodybuilding in that era because
48:33you don't have bodybuilding shows yet.
48:34So it's like, look how strong I am, look
48:35how big I am. So, he's a breakout star
48:37in the 1930s and gets lots and lots of
48:40men and boys to do heavy 20 rep squats
48:44and the gallon of milk a day challenge.
48:46And then you have more conventionally
48:49aesthetic people like John Grimick who
48:52are doing deadlifts and even how they
48:53deadlifted back then is very different
48:55to how we do it now. Squats, you know,
48:57the Olympic lifts were kind of his core
48:58pieces and you're starting to see some
49:00specialization like bicep curls, tricep
49:02extensions, stuff like that.
49:04>> Okay. I was just about to ask about
49:05that. What what was different about the
49:06deadlifts back then?
49:07>> There's different ways of deadlifting as
49:09we know now.
49:10>> Sumo versus conventional is that it
49:12>> you know without the I won't go into
49:14remember when sumo had like the weird
49:15sexual undertones to it like pum
49:18no so nothing like that. Um so there was
49:20different ways to deadlift. So there was
49:22the English style deadlifting where you
49:24would keep your heels together and your
49:26po toes pointed out and then you would
49:28pull your deadlift. Yeah.
49:29>> Okay. Okay. Ooh.
49:30>> For no reason other than Well, this
49:32makes it harder.
49:33>> Yeah. I was going to say.
49:35stability and balance would be a
49:36challenge.
49:37>> Yeah. So it's like, oh, this is stricter
49:38form. So this clearly, you know, in the
49:40same way that people say, well, a
49:41military press can't have any body
49:42English.
49:43>> So some countries would say you can, you
49:44know, you can kind of bend backwards and
49:46push with the English style deadlift,
49:48the heels together, toes pointed out.
49:50You didn't really have sumo yet. That's
49:52more a consequence of powerlifting
49:53becoming sure.
49:54>> But you would have kind of snatch grip
49:56deadlifts. You would have the English
49:57style deadlifts. You would have people
50:00deadlifting with a very rounded back.
50:02Like if you look at a stiff leg deadlift
50:04from the 1920s, 1930s, the legs are
50:06perfectly straight, obviously
50:07stifflegged, but the back is completely
50:09rounded.
50:10>> Interesting.
50:10>> And they're being told, you know,
50:11sometimes stand on a box so you can
50:13really extend accentuate the back
50:15completely rounding under load.
50:17>> I mean, cool. I mean, it's what people
50:19would call a Jefferson curl these days,
50:21right? I don't know. Yeah, it's actually
50:22like
50:23>> quite popular even for people. seen
50:25people standing on a box as you're
50:26describing with the the spine completely
50:29flexed completely bent over and uh yeah
50:32they're just curling and uncurling the
50:33spine and if as long as you're not a lot
50:35of people freak out about this and think
50:36it's dangerous but you know it does work
50:38as long as you don't go heavier than
50:39what you can handle and you know start
50:40light but
50:41>> this is the beginner program so on the
50:43on the plane over here I was looking at
50:45a workout program from the 1930s and it
50:46was like okay do your deadlift uh do
50:48your stiff-legged deadlift do a military
50:50press and then do a row like a bent over
50:52row
50:52>> just one workout
50:53>> yeah and do this deadlift leg deadlift
50:55military press row.
50:57>> It's not bad. It's not bad.
50:58>> Not terrible. Yeah. No. Yeah.
51:00>> But there's like do 15 reps, you know,
51:02with the stiff leged deadlift bent over.
51:04I'm like
51:05>> I don't think a beginner needs to
51:07>> True. True.
51:08>> fully round their back under load. Maybe
51:10maybe I'm a glassback. Maybe I'm getting
51:11it wrong, but maybe not.
51:14>> No, I would agree with that. It also I
51:15mean I don't know. I'm sure that's just
51:16one workout. And I a pet peeve of mine
51:18is when people like judge
51:21the value of a program off of one
51:24workout. It happens to me all the time.
51:25Like I'll post one leg workout and
51:26they'll be like, "You didn't do leg
51:28extensions. Why not?" It's like, "Dude,
51:30I do my legs twice a week." Like what
51:31are we talking about? You're not looking
51:32at the whole program.
51:34>> More than once in my life.
51:35>> Yeah. But nonetheless, I mean, yeah, it
51:37does feel a little odd. Like it's okay
51:40there for the leg work. We've got a lot
51:42of posterior emphasis there, right? A
51:44lot of hamstring and glute. And then um
51:46with the then there's the overhead
51:48press. Okay, we got some shoulders and
51:50triceps. That's pretty cool. We got some
51:51bent row. We got some back and biceps.
51:54Um
51:54>> not not like I said for a full body
51:56workout is honestly not too terrible. I
51:58would like a a horizontal press would
52:00probably complete it, you know, but you
52:01said they they weren't around yet.
52:03>> You could do a pullover and press. We
52:04were doing a factory floor press.
52:05Sometimes you get into a wrestler's
52:06bridge and then you'd pull the barbell
52:08over your head and you'd push up.
52:10>> Wow. Okay. Okay.
52:11>> Built different.
52:12>> Yeah. For real, man. Wow. Incredible.
52:14Okay. I I can see why this like
52:16nostalgia for some of these eras are
52:18starting to to come back around. Um I I
52:20I think it's really cool. All right, so
52:231930s. Now before we go forward, you
52:25hear people put these um
52:28>> terms on the different eras. So you'll
52:30hear like the bronze age, the silver
52:32age, or no, sorry, not age, not the
52:34bronze age, the bronze era, the silver
52:35era, the golden era. Yeah. Yeah. Um and
52:39then I guess the modern era, right? Are
52:40those kind of the four that you'd hear?
52:42bronze, silver, bronze, silver, golden,
52:44mass monster sometimes.
52:45>> Mass monster era, right? And then and
52:47then modern era.
52:48>> So when let's demarcate those like what
52:50do people consider the bronze era from
52:52when
52:53>> it's funny like and it's a really useful
52:55way of grouping people. I think
52:57sometimes we just need to be careful
52:58about what that says. You know, when you
53:00said bronze age, you're like, "Oh,
53:01they're, you know, prehistoric, premier
53:03modern." It's like, so it's just a thing
53:04for people to keep in mind. But bronze
53:06era, you'd have like up to probably
53:081918, you know. So 1800 to 1890 to 1918.
53:12Silver era, you're probably talking,
53:13like 1918 to 1939,
53:181950 at a bush. Golden era is like 1950s
53:21to 1970s.
53:231970s, 1980s somehow falls through the
53:25cracks, which is bizarre to me because
53:26that's when you start to get
53:27bodybuilders getting leaner. We could
53:29call it the shredded ass era because
53:30that's when they start to get striated
53:32glutes on stage. Mass monster would be
53:34kind of late ' 80s.
53:35>> Think you could say to the modern age
53:37like I'm not sure what you call the
53:38modern age because you have open versus
53:40classic versus true
53:41>> like the mult the multiverse era like
53:44I'm not really sure. It's not bad.
53:45>> Yeah. Patent pending. Um but they're
53:48kind of the rough timelines that people
53:49use. I think the the key thing for
53:51people to remember about doing the eras
53:54is some of these eras didn't have sports
53:56like you know so the bronze era well we
53:58had weightlifting but we didn't have
53:59bodybuilding right
54:00>> the silver era where we had
54:02weightlifting and bodybuilding we didn't
54:03have powerlifting you know the golden
54:06era okay we have all of them now but now
54:08we have the Mr. Olympia, which we didn't
54:09have in previous eras, you know, the
54:10mass monster. Well, bodybuilding has
54:12become this
54:13>> like monolithic sport all by itself. So,
54:15how are you going to distinguish
54:16yourself on stage?
54:17>> Muscle and leanness. So, obviously there
54:18would be a m, you know, so it's
54:20important again context and nuance.
54:22Jeez, I'll get this tattooed on my head
54:23at some point, but there are things to
54:25consider when we compare
54:27>> across time. And just because I know
54:29people might get pedantic about this,
54:30we're talking about like bronze, silver,
54:32and golden eras in the context of like
54:34fitness culture because I know then
54:35there's a bronze age which is like a
54:37whole other and then there's film
54:40but this is just Yeah, exactly.
54:41>> Half naked men and women. It's not
54:43>> okay. Um, so we made it up to like the
54:461930sish.
54:48Um, we talked about some of the workouts
54:50there. Um, so let's go into like let's
54:52exit the bronze era now and go into kind
54:54of the silver era. So we're looking at
54:55like around the 40s to 60s give or take.
54:59>> So So what did training start to look
55:01like then and who are some of like the
55:03key figures who help push things
55:04forward?
55:05>> So at a athlete level you start to see
55:07more bodybuilding exercises coming
55:09around. You still have Olympic
55:10weightlifting. You know the US in
55:12particular has a golden age of Olympic
55:13weightlifting in the 40s and 50s where
55:15it's winning gold medals left, right,
55:16and center. But you start see people
55:18doing bodybuilding style training like
55:20and it's sets and reps. It's pushing
55:22hypertrophy, but it's kind of like a
55:24power building a lot of times how I'd
55:26define it, but the power bit might be
55:27different. So, it might be start with
55:29your clean and jerk, your snatch, you
55:30know, your overhead press and then go
55:32into your specialization. Now, you'd
55:34have some people like there's a Canadian
55:36weightlifter, I think he is, uh, Lewis
55:38Abdale, who just specializes on the big
55:40lifts. He's like, I'll do nothing but
55:42squats for three months. I'll do nothing
55:43but presses for three months. Um, but
55:46then you'll have people like Jack Lane,
55:47you know, Steve Reeves, uh, Marvin Ader,
55:50and other people who are going to be
55:51doing bodybuilding style training with
55:54the Olympic lift sometimes thrown in.
55:56>> Now, they can start to do that because
55:58bodybuilding is starting to slowly break
56:00away from weightlifting. So, the Mr.
56:03America show, which in North America is
56:04still like the show in the 40s and 50s,
56:07as I mentioned, you might have a
56:08personality round, which people are
56:10like, "Oh, that's so awful." I'm like,
56:12"Maybe we can probably do it.
56:15that could come back
56:16>> just like a quick litmus test, you know,
56:17>> wait a personality round. What would
56:19that look like? Would they just ask them
56:21like uh beauty pageant style questions?
56:23Really
56:23>> because the Mr. America show was modeled
56:25on the Miss America competition. If you
56:27win this show, you are the perfect
56:29embodiment of
56:30>> America. So, you need to be strong,
56:32muscular, athletic, but you need to have
56:34that personality
56:36>> to carry that off as well. So they'd
56:38interview people, ask them about their
56:39education, their worldviews, their
56:41philosophies. And
56:43>> I'm sure that go over really well in
56:44modern bodybuilding.
56:45>> Well, just, you know, like when a NFL
56:47player gets concussed, like your bells
56:48ring, they're like, you know, who is the
56:50president? Where are you right now? Like
56:52even the simple questions.
56:53>> I mean, like with with the introduction
56:55of trend into mainstream bodybuilding
56:57alone. Like I feel like that would make
56:59that an absolute disaster. But I would
57:01fully support bringing back a
57:03personality
57:03>> rep
57:05just to see what happens. So you'd have
57:07personality, athletic feats. So which I
57:09loved about that is you could do an
57:11Olympic lift in front of the judges or
57:13you could tell them about one of the
57:15titles you'd won as an athlete.
57:16>> Which I love. It's like, yeah, I'm NCAA,
57:18you know, blah blah.
57:19>> I benched 405 in high school.
57:21>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. For sure. Right. But
57:22you can't you My girlfriend goes to
57:24another school. You wouldn't know her.
57:26Like we never met.
57:27>> Yeah. And there's like no internet to
57:28verify. No cameras. No. No video cameras
57:30probably, right? No. No video cameras.
57:31>> Well, there's video early video cameras,
57:33but like there's no way of verifying it.
57:34Like even you know the guy who did
57:36Bickram yoga and he told everyone that
57:37he won an Olympic gold in weightlifting
57:39for India. So I was watching the Bickram
57:41documentary on Netflix and they
57:42mentioned this and I was like that's not
57:43true.
57:44>> Wow.
57:44>> So you could just say things right.
57:45>> You could just say things. Yeah. You
57:47actually oddly enough again another full
57:48circle moment like you can just say
57:50things again now and and if and if no
57:52one believes you just AI it
57:55much
57:55>> easier. Um so I've actually won six
57:57Olympic uh medals in weightlifting. Bob
57:59slay shot.
58:00>> Yeah. We'll put the receipts up right
58:01here.
58:01>> It's all there. Yeah. Right here. Click
58:03and subscribe. Um, but then you
58:05obviously had the physique style, you
58:06know, the physique uh rounds as well.
58:09So, weightlifting still in bodybuilding,
58:10but it's beginning to become diminished.
58:12And people are starting to say, "Well,
58:13how did I win most muscular, best legs,
58:16best chest, best arms, and lose because
58:18he snatches 315 and I snatch 220? Is
58:22this not a physique show? Is this not
58:24So, bodybuilding is beginning to slowly
58:26walk away from weightlifting." And
58:28because of that, people are starting to
58:30specialize on their bodies more. So they
58:32are doing some form of gymnastics still.
58:34Gymnastics has always been a really and
58:36bodyweight exercises has always been a
58:38really important part of bodybuilding
58:39training which kind of fell away I would
58:40say in the last few years. Sometimes
58:42there would be high reps you know they
58:44would have sets and rep schemes and
58:46they're starting to have machines in the
58:48silver era as well which is helping.
58:50Now, sometimes it's terrible. Like,
58:52there's a really funny early leg press
58:54machine, which is basically a wooden uh
58:57platform, not even platform, like box
58:59that's chained to a wall and then you're
59:02going to load on the far side of it the
59:04plates. So, it's trying to fall against
59:06you as you're trying to push it back
59:08against the wall. Incredible ingenuity.
59:11Never do that. Like,
59:13I have plaster boards ever in my house.
59:15If I did that, like just half the wall
59:16would fall on top of me. So, you know,
59:18but you're starting to see that physique
59:20specialization as the Olympic
59:21weightlifterss are becoming bigger and
59:23stronger, etc. And some are crossing the
59:25divide. Like Tommy Kono,
59:27>> the best Olympic weightlifter America
59:29has ever produced. After a weightlifting
59:31competition, he would do bodybuilding
59:33training for 12 or or 24 weeks because
59:35he'd say that's a nice kind of tonic to
59:37what he's doing. So, he won Mr. Universe
59:39shows as well as winning gold medals in
59:41weightlifting because he just did both
59:44because that was the norm in the silver
59:46era. Okay. Now, at the beginning, you
59:49had mentioned um you know the history of
59:53of physical culture with men and women.
59:55So, so far we've we've focused almost
59:57exclusively on the male.
59:58>> Yeah.
1:00:01>> Um so, like when when did or was it from
1:00:04the beginning? Like when when do women
1:00:05start to like get into this or were they
1:00:07from day one? What were some examples
1:00:09there?
1:00:10>> So, there were obviously a lot of
1:00:11barriers uh to women in training and
1:00:13even with those barriers or you did have
1:00:15some breakout stars. So in the 1890s,
1:00:17early 1900s, you had Katie Sanduina, who
1:00:19was a strong woman kind of
1:00:20extraordinaire. And what's really funny,
1:00:22especially in like the modern age of
1:00:24women's fitness, is Katie Sanduina in
1:00:26the 1900s got really good press because
1:00:28they were like, "She's so feminine and
1:00:30she's strong." Kind of similar uh
1:00:33discourses and debates that we'd have
1:00:35now. So you have Katie Sanduina,
1:00:36Manurva, and other strong
1:00:38>> Oh, yeah. Manurva I've seen. Yeah. Yeah.
1:00:40She she was kind of like a some kind of
1:00:41stage performer or something like that.
1:00:43strong woman performer but also did an
1:00:45Olympic weight or not Olympic
1:00:46weightlifting but a weightlifting
1:00:47competition against a woman called
1:00:48Madame Yoka. So she had I know the name
1:00:50>> Yoka not Yoka Yoka
1:00:53>> where was this in the states?
1:00:54>> Yeah yeah in the states. So in the Stark
1:00:57Center in Texas Jan Todd who is a
1:00:59pioneer in so many different ways has
1:01:01Manurva's uh championship belt and her
1:01:03cup from winning a weightlifting show.
1:01:05Now Manurva Sanduina Madamea Victorine
1:01:08Victorina wonderful names but they're
1:01:11like stage performers. Yeah,
1:01:13>> when you look at women's physical
1:01:14culture, they were always encouraged to
1:01:16do gymnastics and calisthenics for very
1:01:18misogynistic reasons. You know, you will
1:01:20birth healthier children. You know, we
1:01:22want to stop you getting brain fatigue.
1:01:24So, if a woman studied out of context,
1:01:25I'm in trouble here. But if a woman
1:01:27studies too much, it will cause nervous
1:01:28fatigue of the brain. So, she needs to
1:01:30exercise to balance that out. 1890s, no,
1:01:3319th century in many ways.
1:01:35>> When you start see women weight
1:01:36training, there's different periods. So
1:01:38in the 1930s you have and 1940s Pudgy
1:01:41Stockton who I think people may have
1:01:42seen online she was part of that muscle
1:01:45beach generation the first muscle beach
1:01:47generation the west coast of America
1:01:48Pudgy Stockton is lifting Olympic
1:01:50weights she's hosting Olympic
1:01:52weightlifting competitions she has a
1:01:53women's fitness column in strength and
1:01:55health magazine called barbells but it's
1:01:57be lit
1:01:59on the fence as to whether that's
1:02:01misogynistic or not but it's a really
1:02:02good it's good branding right
1:02:04>> but Pudgy Stockton she leaves
1:02:07weightlifting Pudgy Stockton.
1:02:08>> Yeah. So, Abigail Pudgy Stockton. Okay.
1:02:10Pudgy was less of a porative. Her dad
1:02:14used to call she would call herself
1:02:15Pudgy Stockton.
1:02:16>> It was a different time.
1:02:18>> We can't judge.
1:02:18>> Wait, we're in the 1910s now.
1:02:20>> No, this is 1940s. 19
1:02:21>> Oh, 1940s.
1:02:22>> There's a big gap.
1:02:23>> Wait, so Manurva in and company the
1:02:25stage performance this would have been
1:02:271890s
1:02:28>> and then there was a pretty big gap and
1:02:30now we're we're up to the 1940s.
1:02:32>> 1930s, 1940s. You have Pudgy Stockton in
1:02:34America. You have Ivy Russell who's an
1:02:36early powerlifter in England in the
1:02:371930s pulls maybe three or 400 pounds
1:02:40which is incredible in that context but
1:02:42then there's another gap and it's only
1:02:44the 1960s 1970s. So my eventual book on
1:02:47women's Olympic weightlifting in the US
1:02:49it's the 1970s you get women like Judy
1:02:51Glenny Karen Marshall and this first
1:02:54generation of incredible women who go
1:02:55into weightlifting at the same time that
1:02:57women like Jan Todd, Cindy Reinhardt and
1:02:59others are going into powerlifting and
1:03:01the likes of Doris Bario are going into
1:03:03bodybuilding. So like modern women's
1:03:05strength cultures, we can trace them to
1:03:07the 1900s. We can trace into Pudgy in
1:03:09the 1930s and Ivy Russell. It's really
1:03:11the 70s and 80s. That's the that's the
1:03:13key period. So to see it compared
1:03:17against the men's kind of fitness
1:03:19sphere. It is actually right that we now
1:03:22have those celebration, you know, more
1:03:23women in fitness, etc. It's right to
1:03:25celebrate that because it's so recent.
1:03:28It's so new.
1:03:29>> Yeah. Wow. Um, but at the same time, I
1:03:32don't know if people would be surprised
1:03:33to know that like even in the 1890s,
1:03:35like there were women who were like
1:03:37lifting weights. How was this perceived
1:03:39at the time? Because like even today in
1:03:42the big 26, you see men being like,
1:03:45"Hey, you know, get out of the weight
1:03:46room and get into the kitchen, right?"
1:03:49Yeah. So, I mean, like I could only
1:03:50imagine like perhaps it was better,
1:03:53maybe not. I would have guessed that it
1:03:54would have been worse and probably like
1:03:56negatively stigmatized for women to lift
1:03:59weights back then or was it accepted and
1:04:02and the same as men?
1:04:03>> Um, it wasn't negatively stigmatized
1:04:06because they were told that they
1:04:07couldn't do it. So, but say that again.
1:04:09>> It wasn't negatively stigmatized because
1:04:11they just couldn't do it. I'll add
1:04:12nuance and context to this. Women could
1:04:15train and had been training in the 1800s
1:04:17with light pound light dumbbells, light
1:04:19Indian gloves, probably five to six
1:04:21pounds max. And you get people saying in
1:04:24the 1850s and 1860s even, okay, I have
1:04:26my men's Indian clubs. They're like
1:04:28bowling pins that you swing around your
1:04:29body and I have my women's Indian clubs
1:04:31over there. And women shall never do
1:04:33>> Oh, I see.
1:04:33>> men's Indian clubs. When you have strong
1:04:35women like Katie Sanduina, Manurva,
1:04:38Victorine, all of these women,
1:04:40>> they are praised because they're the
1:04:43freaks for one. And I mean that in that
1:04:45kind of stage show, they're lifting
1:04:47cannons. They're lifting bank vaults.
1:04:49They're lifting members of the audience.
1:04:51But because they're so unique, they
1:04:53don't get the kind of stigma. But if a
1:04:55woman was to go into Ysef Salai's, you
1:04:58know, basement gym in London in the
1:05:001900s, they would be told to leave. So
1:05:03for the average woman, there's not even
1:05:05a stigma because there's not even an
1:05:06idea that they can access this.
1:05:08>> In the 1930s, when you have Pudgy and
1:05:10Barbells in 1940s as well promoting the
1:05:13idea of women training,
1:05:15>> there is push back. There's a huge push
1:05:16back. John Far and Dominic Moray. He's
1:05:19lovely thing that says more A's than
1:05:20B's, which is like the best pneumonic
1:05:22you can use to remember someone's name.
1:05:24But they found that people are writing
1:05:25into Strength and Health magazine, which
1:05:27is where Pudgy was writing, saying like
1:05:28why are we giving women a platform like
1:05:31this is ridiculous, you know, this is
1:05:32unfeminine, etc. So there's always been
1:05:34a push back. Now the 70s and 80s again,
1:05:37there's a huge push back. So there's
1:05:39always been a stigma regardless of the
1:05:42era. It's just how could women access it
1:05:46with that stigma in place. So in the
1:05:481940s if you were a woman and wanted to
1:05:50train more often than not your brother,
1:05:52your dad or your partner
1:05:54>> introduced you that still held true in
1:05:56the 70s and 80s, but you now had more
1:05:59gyms who were catering to more people.
1:06:00So you could go in, you might start with
1:06:02machines or Jane Fonda or aerobics, then
1:06:05move into weight training. But there's
1:06:07always been a stigma. The difference is
1:06:09how have women been able to access
1:06:11>> strength training
1:06:13>> in light of that stigma or against that
1:06:15stigma. So it's always been there, but
1:06:17what has differed is how women have been
1:06:18able to kind of ignore it. Well, you
1:06:20can't ignore it because it's a horrible
1:06:21thing, but how they've been able to
1:06:23train regardless of it.
1:06:24>> I see. Okay. And then so in the in the
1:06:281890s, it was basically a no-go unless
1:06:30you were some kind of performer, in
1:06:32which case you get a pass. In the 30s,
1:06:34was it the same sort of thing or was it
1:06:36a little more common to see women in the
1:06:38same places that like gymnasiums and
1:06:40this sort of thing as men were?
1:06:42>> You're starting to see it more. Now,
1:06:43that doesn't mean that it's widespread,
1:06:45but you are starting to see it more.
1:06:46There are some gyms who would do Monday,
1:06:48Wednesday, Friday as men, Tuesday,
1:06:50Thursday, Saturday as women.
1:06:51>> You'd have more women training at home.
1:06:53And this is where Bob Hoffman's really
1:06:54important because he was selling
1:06:56barbells and dumbbells for home use.
1:06:58>> So, you don't need to go to a gym
1:06:59because it'll introduce you, right? you
1:07:00know, to to dumbbells. By the time you
1:07:02get to the 70s and 80s, it is still
1:07:05actually largely facilitated by the men
1:07:07in your life. You know, my coach, a male
1:07:10coach from a sport, my brother, my
1:07:12father, my spouse, like it's really only
1:07:15in like probably the 20110s or the 2000s
1:07:19where women can get into it themselves.
1:07:22You know, when I mean themselves, I mean
1:07:24they don't they don't need to have a man
1:07:26shephering them into that space. They
1:07:28can just go into a gym. they can they
1:07:29know what they need to do. They know
1:07:31it's not going to harm them medically,
1:07:32etc. Yeah.
1:07:33>> So, for a long time, access has been
1:07:35mediated through men first and then they
1:07:38would get into it.
1:07:39>> Gotcha. Okay. Okay. All right. So, I
1:07:41want to keep going through the eras here
1:07:42to see how things evolve. So, we're
1:07:44looking at like in the 30s, um you said
1:07:47it was John Grimick, right? Was kind of
1:07:48like the guy and his physique was pretty
1:07:52incredible. um not as shredded as some
1:07:55of the other guys, but the muscle
1:07:56bellies and the the shape was the best.
1:08:00>> Um and he did a lot of I would guess you
1:08:04could say like
1:08:06basic barbell lifts like you know rows,
1:08:09some curls, this sort of thing,
1:08:11deadlifts, right?
1:08:12>> Yeah. Yeah. Um okay. And then so let's
1:08:16move out of and then so the silver era
1:08:18goes through to like the 50s and 60s,
1:08:20right? So, is there any kind of like
1:08:22like around what time do like we start
1:08:26to see um like Larry Scott come in and
1:08:29then you see the pre the Scott curl or
1:08:31now we call it the preacher curl like
1:08:33did did these exercises kind of start to
1:08:35drip in through this this era between
1:08:36like the 40s and 60s.
1:08:38>> So, the 1950s 1960s is probably where
1:08:41because you're getting more specialized
1:08:42bodybuilding training,
1:08:43>> right? Okay.
1:08:44>> And a key moment in that is the Mr.
1:08:46Olympia show. So, first show is 1965.
1:08:49There are other shows before that that
1:08:51are doing this, but the Olympia is the
1:08:53first one because they say physique
1:08:54only. We don't care about your
1:08:55personality. We don't care about your
1:08:57athleticism. We don't care if you've won
1:08:59a bodybuilding show before. Eventually,
1:09:01the Mr. America kind of because of
1:09:02Grimmik, they'd say, well, once you've
1:09:04won it once, you can't re-enter.
1:09:06>> So, it's like I'm a one-time Mr. America
1:09:08because I can't go back. The Olympia
1:09:10said, we just care who's the best. So,
1:09:11if you've won it once, doesn't matter.
1:09:13You just keep going. But because you
1:09:16move away from athleticism, you move
1:09:18away from personality, it's just the
1:09:20physique. Well, then we're going to put
1:09:22everything into developing the physique.
1:09:25>> Okay. Got it. Got it. And then as we
1:09:27come out of the the 60s, now we're into
1:09:29like the 70s and 80s. Okay. So, you
1:09:32know, this is where this is like the
1:09:33Arnold's era, right? Um and so when I
1:09:36look back at footage from from this
1:09:38time, it resembles quite closely to what
1:09:40you see in gyms today, right? So I feel
1:09:42like by the time you get to the 70s,
1:09:44you're looking at a pretty close
1:09:48approximation of the modern era
1:09:50training, would you say?
1:09:51>> Absolutely. Because you're starting to
1:09:53get machines as well. So the 1960s with
1:09:56the universal gym machines and then the
1:09:58knotless machines with Arthur Jones,
1:10:00they're beginning to come into fitness
1:10:01space as well. Before that, you'd have,
1:10:03you know, lat pull downs, some early leg
1:10:05presses, bent like tea bar rows. And if
1:10:07anyone looks at pumping iron, which is
1:10:09said obviously in Gold's gym in Venice
1:10:10Beach, a lot of that equipment was made
1:10:12by Joe Gold himself because he said,
1:10:15"Well, there's not enough good
1:10:16equipment." So, he would make a lot of
1:10:17the machines with the dumbbells as well.
1:10:19So, it looks so similar, but the
1:10:21machines are quite new, you know, in
1:10:23that context.
1:10:24>> But in terms of how they train, it is
1:10:27largely high reps, high sets. You know,
1:10:29people talk about following like the
1:10:30Arnold method. You know, well, if he's
1:10:32doing this, I'll do this.
1:10:33>> But because people can now specialize in
1:10:35the physique because drugs have
1:10:37obviously entered the game in a major
1:10:38way now. They're they're there in the
1:10:3950s and 60s, but they're really
1:10:41exploding in the 70s and 80s. Physiques
1:10:43are getting bigger. That changes how
1:10:44people can train, how they can recover,
1:10:47expectations of what they should look
1:10:48like on stage. But you do still get
1:10:50differences, right, in the 70s and 80s,
1:10:52which is really interesting. So, you get
1:10:54Arnold, high sets, high reps. You get
1:10:56Sergio Olivier, who you know is like the
1:10:59myth Sergio Olivier. He's the man before
1:11:00Arnold. He would train like a madman.
1:11:03Like he would go around the gym with
1:11:04like no rest whatsoever for two hours.
1:11:06>> Oh wow.
1:11:06>> Um and his training partner at the time,
1:11:08Bob Gadget, his peripheral heart action
1:11:10training. Same thing. It's like
1:11:12basically circuits, but you're pushing
1:11:13yourself physically, you know,
1:11:15throughout the entire process. You'll
1:11:17then get your Mike Mener, Arthur Jones,
1:11:20highintensity training because people
1:11:22are just trying to figure out
1:11:25>> the thing that they need to build their
1:11:27physiques and it's creating a lot of
1:11:29>> like variation in training and you get
1:11:32different training camps and you get
1:11:33different equipment that they're using
1:11:35which is quite fun because the 60s and
1:11:3770s
1:11:38>> it's like a really nice battle of ideas
1:11:40going on in bodybuilding about what's
1:11:42the best system and you're getting more
1:11:44and more people trying different things
1:11:45out. Gotcha. Okay. So then the the
1:11:48Mener, so we've got Arnold and Olivia,
1:11:50like those guys kind of ran this
1:11:54maybe late 60s to early 80s type
1:11:56situation. And um
1:11:58>> you know I I I I know like Arnold would
1:12:01just train super high volume, lots of
1:12:03pump work, like lots of really hard
1:12:04training, like marathon workout,
1:12:05sometimes two a day workouts. Um so that
1:12:08was kind of what training looked like
1:12:09then. But then you come to like the late
1:12:1180s, early 90s and you get the Mike
1:12:13Meners and the Dorian Yates, right? And
1:12:15so this is the era where you see strip
1:12:18all the volume back but you just do a
1:12:20couple really hard allout sets to
1:12:22failure right um and that was kind of
1:12:25like I guess the prevailing approach
1:12:28then or was it still on the margins
1:12:30>> it's a competing philosophy got so the
1:12:32high-intensity training Mike is the
1:12:34first poster child of it but really it's
1:12:36Casey Vattor so if people have seen the
1:12:38Colorado experiment we'll put experiment
1:12:40in air quotes um it's hosted by Arthur
1:12:43Jones and Casey Vattor who's Mr. America
1:12:45Bodybuilding Champion in the mid1 1970s.
1:12:48>> Casey and Arthur claimed that in 28 days
1:12:51he gained 30 to 40 pounds of muscle.
1:12:53Yeah. And you've seen the before and
1:12:54after photos.
1:12:55>> And this is Arthur Jones who creates the
1:12:57knotless machines and then creates a
1:13:00system to use the machines trying to
1:13:02promote his highintensity training,
1:13:03right?
1:13:04>> And you have people looking at Casey
1:13:06Vattor and saying, "Well, I want to
1:13:09>> I want to copy that, including Arnold."
1:13:11So Randy Roach in his book Muscle Smok
1:13:13and Mirrors talks about a two-week
1:13:14experiment that Franco Columbo, who's
1:13:16Arnold's friend and a Mr. Olympia in his
1:13:18own right, and Arnold trained with
1:13:20Arthur Jones because they wanted to see
1:13:22if this would be effective. And Arnold
1:13:25quit after a couple of days because he
1:13:27couldn't handle the intensity.
1:13:29>> Really?
1:13:30>> I find that so shocking because Arnold
1:13:31trains so hard
1:13:34like on his own accord.
1:13:35>> Well, this is the interesting thing,
1:13:36right? Because fitness is obviously
1:13:38specific. So Arnold trains really hard
1:13:40in his system, but you know yourself.
1:13:42Like so a good friend of mine does
1:13:44natural stone lifting. Yeah. The first
1:13:45time he took me stone lifting. It killed
1:13:47me because I'd never done it. You know,
1:13:49I wasn't conditioned for that particular
1:13:50thing.
1:13:51>> So Arnold wasn't conditioned in the
1:13:53sense of doing highintensity training.
1:13:55So he quit. And Arthur Jones is like he,
1:13:58you know, he doesn't train hard. He
1:13:59can't handle it. And Franco survived the
1:14:01experiment and then said, actually this
1:14:02isn't for me. I I prefer my own thing.
1:14:04But you have in the 70s people really
1:14:07testing the highintensity training. It
1:14:09becomes more popular with Mike in the
1:14:11late 70s, early 80s in particular when
1:14:13he gets a perfect score on more than one
1:14:15bodybuilding show. And John Little has a
1:14:18really good biography of Mike Menser
1:14:19called American Odysius.
1:14:21>> So you get more people trying it, but
1:14:23then you also get people like Lee Haney,
1:14:24who's probably the most slept on
1:14:26Olympia.
1:14:27>> Yeah.
1:14:27>> Of all time, who's train don't strain.
1:14:30>> I know. Well, it was stimulate don't
1:14:32annihilate, right? Yeah. Yeah. Did he
1:14:33have train don't strain too? I had never
1:14:35heard that one.
1:14:36>> It was just like not easy, but it's much
1:14:38more moderate in the same time that you
1:14:40know Mike and uh Ray Menser and Arthur
1:14:43Jones still learned a little bit at that
1:14:44point are really hitting that high
1:14:46intensity piece. And then you get like
1:14:48your outliers like Tom Plattz who is
1:14:50just
1:14:51>> doing whatever Tom Plattz does when he
1:14:53squats. But even he was influenced by
1:14:55kind of the Mike Mener approach because
1:14:57he would say, "Well, I would squat once
1:14:59>> a month or once a fortnight because I
1:15:01couldn't recover,
1:15:03>> you know, outside of that." And I would
1:15:04deadlift because that would influ in
1:15:06that would kind of influence my recovery
1:15:08for different exercises. So even someone
1:15:10like Tom Platcore
1:15:12to the bone is also looking at well
1:15:14what's my recovery rate in between, you
1:15:16know? So it's starting to bleed
1:15:17together.
1:15:18>> Okay. So, let's I want to start to think
1:15:20about because this is something people
1:15:22are endlessly fascinated by um training
1:15:25splits.
1:15:26>> So, like I think as as far as I can tell
1:15:29from what you've said so far like from
1:15:31the 1890s through to like the
1:15:3630s4s it seemed like it was mostly like
1:15:38geared toward athletics and like full
1:15:41body stuff.
1:15:41>> Yes.
1:15:42>> When does when do people start doing
1:15:44splits as we know them today? Whether
1:15:45that's like upper body or like body part
1:15:47splits and this kind of thing.
1:15:49>> So my new training program only nine out
1:15:51of the best ever historically informed.
1:15:53That'll be the new thing.
1:15:55>> I'm buying that. I'm buying it.
1:15:56>> I want I want a Connor Hefernon program
1:15:59that's based on
1:16:01>> everything we know about history.
1:16:02>> Yeah. A thousand years went into this
1:16:0310-minute workout.
1:16:04>> Come on, man.
1:16:05>> So you're right. It's mainly full body
1:16:07programs really until the 1950s. Even
1:16:09Steve Reeves, you know, who eventually
1:16:11gets kind of Hercules fame is more full
1:16:13body than anything else. Reg Park is 5
1:16:15by five is mainly his training.
1:16:17>> Five by five. Five sets of five reps.
1:16:18>> Yeah. Across, you know, like your kind
1:16:20of big compound exercises.
1:16:22>> So that that obviously came back around
1:16:23later with starting strength and
1:16:25everything else. Okay. All right.
1:16:26>> Uh what's old is new,
1:16:29>> bro. The more I learn about this stuff,
1:16:31the more I realize that this is just
1:16:33like one big cycle. It it just keep the
1:16:37things just keep coming back around.
1:16:38It's incredible. But anyway, yeah,
1:16:39continue about the splits.
1:16:40>> Yeah. the late Charles Polloquin would
1:16:41say, "If you want to learn something
1:16:42new, read a fitness magazine from 20
1:16:44years ago." Um, which again is quite
1:16:46funny, but the the training split, so
1:16:48it's more the 50s and 60s because
1:16:50there's two things going on. So, it's
1:16:53more machines are coming around. So, now
1:16:55I don't actually need to rely on
1:16:57compound lifts, you know, or even
1:16:58barbells or dumbbells to do my
1:17:00exercises. And then bodybuilding
1:17:01specializing. Now it really comes to the
1:17:03four in the 1960s when bodybuilding is
1:17:06becoming like its own sport and its own
1:17:08culture has its own gyms. So the 50s and
1:17:1160s is when you're starting to see that
1:17:12split 70s obviously it starts to
1:17:14maintain more like what we see today and
1:17:17this era you know from the late 50s to
1:17:19the 1970s you're starting to see
1:17:21bodybuilding coaches. So, as the splits
1:17:23are becoming more refined or more
1:17:26specialized, the exercises are becoming
1:17:29more refined and specialized because if
1:17:30I don't have to do a full body,
1:17:32>> well, damn, I can I can do two hours of
1:17:34legs. So, okay, like I'll do squats, but
1:17:35then what do I do after that? I'll do
1:17:37some hamstring curls. Okay, I'll do leg
1:17:38extensions. I'll do leg press. I'll do
1:17:40squats. I'll you know, they're
1:17:42starting to specialize because they can
1:17:44now because now they have a day, you
1:17:47know, to do shoulder and legs, chest and
1:17:50buys, whatever the case may be.
1:17:52>> Yeah. Okay. Okay. So, do you do you know
1:17:53what the first So, full body is the
1:17:55first, but after full body, do you know
1:17:57what the first split was?
1:17:58>> So, you you would have upper lower. Oh,
1:18:01really? That would be kind of an early
1:18:02one, but then you would also get kind of
1:18:04these smattering ones. So, if you stick
1:18:06with me, you would have kind of, you
1:18:08know, your leg day and then you'd have
1:18:10maybe chest and then you'd have your uh
1:18:12your back and you have your arms. This
1:18:13would come more in the late 50s but like
1:18:16the early iterations would be mainly
1:18:18upper lower and in that upper lower it
1:18:21would still be mainly compound
1:18:22exercises.
1:18:23>> Okay.
1:18:23>> And the reason for that is that the very
1:18:25first splits were largely informed by
1:18:27Olympic weightlifting.
1:18:29>> Right. So I'm going to have my clean and
1:18:30my clean and jerk day. I'm going to have
1:18:32my snatch day. I'm going to have my
1:18:33press day.
1:18:33>> Yes. Okay. Okay. So So then we get to
1:18:36we're jumping around a bit but then we
1:18:37get to the 70s with with splits. Now
1:18:39what was Arnold's split? Because this is
1:18:41something that people still seem to
1:18:43argue about and like a lot of people
1:18:45still say they're following an Arnold
1:18:46split and I'm like was that Arnold
1:18:48split? Like what did Arnold actually do?
1:18:50>> It's funny cuz there was something. It's
1:18:52like the golden 10 or something someone
1:18:54like a couple of years ago someone's
1:18:55like oh that Arnold split the golden
1:18:57something. I was like I have never heard
1:18:58it. I was like when
1:19:00>> you can just make stuff up.
1:19:00>> You can mix it up. I was like okay I
1:19:02guess Arnold did it. Arnold trained like
1:19:05you know you're saying people will judge
1:19:06you by one leg workout.
1:19:08>> Yes. So Arnold has his encyclopedia of
1:19:10modern bodybuilding where he'll talk
1:19:12about beginner, intermediate, advanced.
1:19:14The truth is that all of these people
1:19:15trained a variety of different ways.
1:19:17Like Arnold started off as an Olympic
1:19:19weightlifter. He then did powerlifting.
1:19:21He then moved into bodybuilding.
1:19:23>> In the bodybuilding, he trained a
1:19:24certain way when he was in Europe. And
1:19:26then when he went to Joe Weider in the
1:19:27US, he would train another way. He would
1:19:29be influenced by Reg Parks 5x5, by
1:19:31Olympic weightlifting, by powerlifting.
1:19:33He would trial all of these things. So
1:19:35rather than looking at specific
1:19:37movements, you know, and specific rep
1:19:39rep schemes, I think you look at the
1:19:41foundations of what he did, you know,
1:19:43when he was at his peak. So when he was
1:19:44at his peak, it was high sets, you know,
1:19:46high reps, lots of volume, sometimes two
1:19:49a days.
1:19:49>> Yeah,
1:19:50>> that was kind of the general core.
1:19:52>> And then he would vary that as he went.
1:19:55And what people need to remember is
1:19:57cutting down in Arno's day was not
1:20:00calorie counting. Now it was oftentimes
1:20:02using a keto diet. So, I have a book
1:20:04somewhere there from Arnold's
1:20:05nutritionist called You Can't Flex Fat,
1:20:08which is all about using keto to diet
1:20:10down for competition. So, you would do
1:20:12your ketogenic diet and then you would
1:20:15increase your sets and reps.
1:20:17>> So, that's how you would cut down,
1:20:18right? Is in the gym. You weren't
1:20:19necessarily doing cardio. You weren't
1:20:22necessarily calorie counting, although
1:20:23they were monitoring their foods. You
1:20:26were using your training to reduce. And
1:20:28that's what people did in the 50s and
1:20:2960s and 70s. So when people talk about
1:20:31the Arnold split, it's like, okay, well,
1:20:33was he bulking or cutting? Was he in
1:20:35season, off season? Yes. Because he used
1:20:38that as like a dial to get more shredded
1:20:40over time.
1:20:41>> 1979. Is this an original?
1:20:43>> Yeah. Yeah.
1:20:44>> What a what a cover. Like it's it's so
1:20:46cool.
1:20:47>> It's kind of like, you know, like if
1:20:49someone's an ass, like, you know, if
1:20:50you're in the gym, you're like, "Oh, how
1:20:51do I build a physique?" Like, you're
1:20:52like, "You can't flex fat." You know,
1:20:53like,
1:20:54>> wait, what does you can't flex fat mean?
1:20:56Oh, it just means you it's not
1:20:57functional. Like there's no point in
1:20:58having it. If you're on stage, you need
1:21:00to be lean, right? Like it's not going
1:21:02to impress anyone if you're 200 lb body
1:21:05>> fat. This is just incredible. Wow. So I
1:21:07see a meal plan in here level one. So
1:21:09they break it down by Wow. So ectomorph
1:21:11was around
1:21:13the 1930s. Wow. Ectomorph since Yeah,
1:21:16that's right. was the original of it.
1:21:20>> That is such an odd history if you
1:21:21really look into it with like eugenics
1:21:22and all this kind of stuff. There's some
1:21:24weird overlap there.
1:21:25>> Fitness Jack.
1:21:26>> True, true, true, true, true. That is
1:21:27true.
1:21:28>> That's fine. and the best body. Why
1:21:29would you want to do that?
1:21:30>> Yeah, true. So true. Um, okay. So, when
1:21:33you look at the the diet here, we've got
1:21:34level one breakfast, two eggs, poached
1:21:37preferably, but any style is okay.
1:21:40>> However,
1:21:41>> that's great. A quarter pound of meat,
1:21:44eight ounces of milk, one slice of whole
1:21:47grain toast with butter.
1:21:49>> That's you.
1:21:51>> Then it's just more meat and juice and
1:21:53Wow. I mean,
1:21:55>> listen, it works.
1:21:56>> It's a lot of protein. Yeah, but like
1:21:58other diets from that time, you had
1:21:59Vince Garand's definition diet which was
1:22:01super highfat. You had Rio H. Blair did
1:22:04a water and meat diet to reduce people
1:22:06down. So almost like an early carnivore
1:22:08diet,
1:22:09>> but usually in the 60s and 70s it was
1:22:12strip back your carbs massively.
1:22:14Obviously lower your calories because
1:22:15you've stripped back your carbs and then
1:22:17train almost like circuit training. Use
1:22:20your volume to to
1:22:22>> Yeah.
1:22:22>> reduce your body fat.
1:22:23>> Yeah. And a lot of people still seem to
1:22:25think that's true. not within like the
1:22:27serious fitness space. Like I feel like
1:22:28a lot of my audience wouldn't think high
1:22:30reps to tone is true, but in the
1:22:31mainstream that's still a very prevalent
1:22:33myth. Like if if you want to get ripped,
1:22:36>> do high reps. If you want to bulk, do
1:22:37low reps. In reality, obviously like
1:22:40that the caloric burn difference is
1:22:41basically negligible.
1:22:43And um
1:22:44>> when I discovered that, that genuinely
1:22:46broke my heart cuz I was cycling my
1:22:48calories. I was like, well, it's leg
1:22:49day, so I mean that's that's good for
1:22:50another like 500 calories.
1:22:52realized I was like, "Oh,
1:22:54>> it takes a lot of activity to burn a lot
1:22:55of calories." I'll tell you that. Um,
1:22:57but also, um, we just know with a fairly
1:23:01high degree of confidence that basically
1:23:03all rep ranges build muscle provided
1:23:05they're trained sufficiently close to
1:23:06failure. So, yeah, the rep range thing
1:23:08is just a huge huge myth that has lasted
1:23:11I I guess probably since at least then.
1:23:13>> Oh, yeah. Because and like you could
1:23:14understand during that era why they
1:23:17might think that. Now, I have another
1:23:18book there. It's a Franco Columbo book.
1:23:20It's I think it's called nutrition for
1:23:22bodybuilders or bodybuilders nutrition.
1:23:24That's coming at a similar time. So it's
1:23:26underneath the uh Bernard McFaden thing.
1:23:28It's coming at
1:23:29>> cover, bro.
1:23:30>> Similar time.
1:23:30>> He's got a apple in that little gap
1:23:33between his uh
1:23:34>> his bicep and his elbow.
1:23:36>> But if you flick into that, you'll start
1:23:37to see calories and calories being
1:23:39mentioned. So by the 1980s, you have
1:23:42someone like Rich Kaspari who's
1:23:43literally carrying around like a
1:23:45university textbook with all the calorie
1:23:47breakdowns. So they're starting to
1:23:48follow that. Yeah.
1:23:49>> And I think doing that helped to move
1:23:52people away from, oh, it's just remove
1:23:55carbs. It's just, you know, increase my
1:23:57volume. They're starting to track it a
1:23:59bit more. But to go back to your point
1:24:01about how did Arnold train, you have to
1:24:03ask, well, where where was he in his
1:24:04season, you know, for one of a better
1:24:06phrase.
1:24:07>> Yeah, this is starting to look a lot
1:24:09more scientific. I'm hearing like, you
1:24:11know, vitamin B6 and B12 and vitamin B
1:24:14complex supplements. And I just saw a
1:24:16mention of amenorhea, which is
1:24:18interesting because I'm sure that's
1:24:19something, you know, female bodybuilders
1:24:21have to deal with. We're talking about
1:24:23thyroid medications and all kinds of
1:24:25stuff. So, it's like, yeah, you see the
1:24:28the pickup in the scientific analytical
1:24:30side of things here, even though I did
1:24:32notice there's still a little bit of uh
1:24:35bunk in here as as you
1:24:36>> Well, Franco is an interesting cat
1:24:38because he was a complimentary
1:24:40alternative medicine, isn't that he is
1:24:41in North America? He had a degree in
1:24:43it's either
1:24:44>> osteop osteopathy or chiropractic. I
1:24:47think it might have been osteopathy.
1:24:48>> So he's coming at it from that kind of
1:24:50alternative health lens.
1:24:51>> But more people are beginning to do
1:24:53that. Like even Vince Ganda who's the
1:24:55trainer to the stars in the 60s and 70s,
1:24:57he would have these vast supplement
1:24:59lists of like brewer yeast and iodine
1:25:02tablets and kelp tablets and all these
1:25:03things because he's trying to kind of
1:25:05scientifically, you know, produce an
1:25:07outcome with his athletes. But you're
1:25:09starting to see really from the late '7s
1:25:11on people moving away from kind of urban
1:25:15myth fitness to like, okay, what is my
1:25:18caloric intake for today? What's my
1:25:20caloric burn? Okay, I'm going to have to
1:25:21start being like somewhat serious with
1:25:23my cardio, you know, to if I'm dieting
1:25:25down for competition.
1:25:27>> But before that, it's like high fat,
1:25:29high reps. I'm trying to think now like
1:25:32when when would foods have like when
1:25:35were calor cal calorie content databases
1:25:38when did that become a thing? Like I'm
1:25:40just trying to think like now
1:25:41>> we track using an app or on a
1:25:44spreadsheet or something, right? Like
1:25:46like how or it's on the label obviously,
1:25:48right? But like how how did how would
1:25:50you track like did food labels were food
1:25:53labels around then? And when did when
1:25:55did that start happening? So you have
1:25:57calories and calorie knowledge come
1:25:58around the 1890s early 1990s. Yeah.
1:26:01Yeah. The first calorie tables um in the
1:26:03US at least in North America. It's a man
1:26:05named Atwater who's a government
1:26:06official and he produces these tables.
1:26:09You actually get the first calorie
1:26:10weight loss books in the 1910s 1920s
1:26:13really geared at women
1:26:15>> as opposed to men. Now, in terms of
1:26:17labeling, this is something that becomes
1:26:18more important in the 50s and 60s and
1:26:20oftentimes not because of health, but
1:26:22because of shoddy food
1:26:24>> practices. Um, so, but it's not until
1:26:27the 70s and ' 80s that bodybuilding
1:26:29begins to take on calories, which is so
1:26:31funny because you would think that this
1:26:33would be
1:26:34>> a no-brainer in some ways, but just
1:26:35shows that culturally it wasn't talked
1:26:37about.
1:26:38>> To be honest with you, bodybuilders
1:26:39still haven't fully taken on calories
1:26:41because a lot of bodybuilders would say,
1:26:43"It's just about the foods. Don't count
1:26:44calories. Don't track your workouts.
1:26:45It's all just it's a who's watsy, you
1:26:48know,
1:26:48>> figure it out. It's standard. Yeah, I
1:26:50got that. It's fine.
1:26:51>> Um, but okay. Wow. So, wait. In the
1:26:531920s, they had the idea that like if
1:26:57women in this case wanted to lose
1:26:58weight, they had to restrict calories.
1:27:00Like they understood energy balance and
1:27:02this kind of thing.
1:27:02>> Yeah. And they also understand praying
1:27:03on women's insecurities, which is, you
1:27:05know, there there' be money in them.
1:27:07There are heels. But yeah, they would
1:27:09have these weight loss books, these
1:27:10reducing books. So, women would have
1:27:12their table. So, you know, here's your
1:27:13meal for today. Here's the calories of
1:27:14it. make sure that you hit this caloric
1:27:16total. If you can't eat this, here are
1:27:18some comparable foods. And even if you
1:27:21look at, you know, some of the early
1:27:221900s, they would talk about like
1:27:24protein or nitrogen content. So they
1:27:27would, some people, not all, would say,
1:27:29eat high protein foods or high nitrogen
1:27:32foods. And they would have tables of,
1:27:34you know, 4 ounces of steak is whatever
1:27:37in protein. You know, an egg has this
1:27:39much protein or this much nitrogen. So
1:27:40there's always been a recognition of not
1:27:42always but a lot of time of minerals and
1:27:44vitamins but calories yes marketed to
1:27:46women in the 1920s long gap before you
1:27:49have rich kaspari you know eating
1:27:51breakfast with the the book beside him.
1:27:53>> Interesting. Yeah, I find that I just
1:27:56find that so surprising because it's
1:27:57like, you know, this is this is
1:27:59something that was
1:28:00>> at least on the cusp of being understood
1:28:03a century ago and now today you still
1:28:05have mainstream
1:28:09public figures talking about how, you
1:28:11know, calories are essentially a myth
1:28:13and and all this kind of thing. And it's
1:28:14like what does it what does it take to
1:28:17actually like raise the level of public
1:28:20awareness on these sorts of basic
1:28:22principles
1:28:23>> like and you're right like in one hand
1:28:24we know too much now. So, you know, when
1:28:26people like, "Well, it's not just
1:28:27calories in, calories out. There's
1:28:28hormones." And you're like, "Yeah, no,
1:28:29that's all true." But also, like,
1:28:30>> if you want to know how to lose weight,
1:28:32you ask like a natural bodybuilder,
1:28:34right? Because they're the most
1:28:35successful people at learning how to
1:28:37know whether it's sustainable or
1:28:38long-term, like that's all a different
1:28:40conversation. What do they do, you know?
1:28:42And but then you need to look at your
1:28:43environment. So, we kind of know too
1:28:45much now,
1:28:46>> right?
1:28:46>> In in some respects and then not enough
1:28:48in other respects. Like, okay, at a
1:28:51population level, yes, there's all this
1:28:52nuance. At an individual level, if you
1:28:54wanted to lose weight, I'm you're
1:28:56probably going to recommend some level
1:28:58of awareness around how much you eat and
1:29:02slightly modifying that.
1:29:05>> Yeah. I mean, it was caloric deficit
1:29:07like
1:29:09tiptoeing around like how will this be
1:29:11misconstrued?
1:29:12>> Yeah. No, no, it is that is just basic
1:29:14thermodynamics, man. Um but you know I
1:29:16mean you you are correct to say that
1:29:18like yes on the population level it gets
1:29:20very complex and nuanced when you know
1:29:22you look at like access and food deserts
1:29:25and all these sorts of things are are
1:29:26real concerns and they're valid and yada
1:29:29yada yada fitness.
1:29:30>> Yeah.
1:29:31>> Yeah. But no but then there's also this
1:29:33you know whole thing about hormones and
1:29:35it's like oh yes well hormones can
1:29:36affect your metabolism that impacts the
1:29:39energy outside of the equation. Right.
1:29:40So it still comes back to that basic
1:29:42fundamental principle. Um, but yeah, I
1:29:45just I do find it so interesting that
1:29:47it's like,
1:29:48>> oh man, like you guys had it figured out
1:29:50a hundred years ago and then we had a,
1:29:52you know, 80 years of regression just to
1:29:55like almost get back there again. But I
1:29:56think I think a lot of it does come back
1:29:58to some of these like
1:29:59>> fallacies of people looking at people
1:30:01who have had success and saying
1:30:03therefore I must emulate what that
1:30:04person did if I want their results and
1:30:06not realizing that like there are so
1:30:08many other factors that go into building
1:30:10a physique beyond that. But for all
1:30:12that, there are still like fundamental
1:30:14scientific principles that like no one
1:30:17gets to skip on. Yeah, exactly. Um,
1:30:19>> okay. Anyway, all right. So, that's all
1:30:21good. Let's let's skip ahead to um the
1:30:24the 1990s. So, now we're into like the
1:30:27mass monster era. I I I do believe that
1:30:30like the biggest difference here. Like
1:30:31on once we start getting into like the
1:30:3480s and 90s, what happens and the
1:30:36difference you see in physiques come
1:30:38primarily from a change in drugs. Yeah,
1:30:41that's pretty much it, right?
1:30:42>> More drugs, better drugs, more
1:30:44accessibility, more knowledge about
1:30:46drugs. So, in the 1980s, you have a guy
1:30:48called Dan Duchain
1:30:50>> who publishes the underground steroid
1:30:51handbook. He helps democratize steroid
1:30:53knowledge. And what I mean by that is,
1:30:55you know, I don't have to ask the big
1:30:56guy what he does. I can read the steroid
1:30:59handbook. And Duchain
1:31:01>> for all of the federal charges against
1:31:02him, which is never a sentence you want
1:31:03to start with,
1:31:04>> he is trying to be scientific about drug
1:31:06taking.
1:31:07>> Okay? And you get more knowledge around
1:31:09drugs at a time when more drugs are
1:31:11coming to the market alongside better
1:31:13nutritional not better nutritional
1:31:15practices but stricter nutritional
1:31:16practices. So Dorian Yates for example
1:31:18is obviously taking steroids that people
1:31:20in the 80s didn't have access to.
1:31:22>> But he's also tracking his calories in a
1:31:23way that people in the 1970s didn't. And
1:31:26a really interesting I suppose example
1:31:29of how quickly drugs can change
1:31:30physiques. You look at Arnold's last
1:31:32Olympia win which was some more
1:31:33controversial the 1980 win. And then you
1:31:36look at him in the early 1970s, it's a
1:31:39very different physique in terms of
1:31:40conditioning and how shredded he is. And
1:31:43some of that is obviously his diet has
1:31:44changed, but also he's using different
1:31:47drugs. And the 1990s, it goes into
1:31:50overdrive. You get bans on diuretics
1:31:52because people are collapsing. You get
1:31:53someone like Andreas Monzer who who dies
1:31:55early largely due to an excess of
1:31:58anabolics and different steroids. So the
1:32:01mass monster era training has not
1:32:04necessarily evolved massively.
1:32:06>> The pharmaceuticals have.
1:32:08>> Yeah.
1:32:09>> And also I would say the
1:32:11>> limits to which people are willing to go
1:32:13have arguably maybe changed a little bit
1:32:15because of that because people are now
1:32:16bigger. They're now leaner. So to be
1:32:18bigger and leaner I now need to go even
1:32:20more extreme than that. But it that's
1:32:22kind of the pharmaceutical the second
1:32:24pharmaceutical revolution in
1:32:26bodybuilding is the 1990s.
1:32:28>> Wow. Dan Duchaine, the federal charges
1:32:30was steroid related.
1:32:31>> Yeah. For pedaling drugs. Okay. Um Yeah.
1:32:33He also did a cyclical keto diet which
1:32:35is just insane. It's called the body
1:32:36opus diet.
1:32:37>> Oh yeah.
1:32:38>> Uh oh my god. It's just so complicated,
1:32:40>> man. The more like all all of these
1:32:42names and all these different Yeah.
1:32:44There's just it makes me realize just
1:32:47like
1:32:49>> like just how much there has been out
1:32:51there on how to get jacked and like how
1:32:54many little like debates there are and
1:32:56like different schools and it's like oh
1:32:58man like there is a through line through
1:33:01all of this you know like there actually
1:33:03is but you know people will always just
1:33:06debate endlessly on the margins you know
1:33:08um
1:33:08>> which which is fine because it's fun
1:33:10like it's it's fun it's fun to compare
1:33:12my training to someone else's training
1:33:14talk about one supplement versus
1:33:15another. But as I said like the
1:33:16fundamentals
1:33:18>> like they like they all they all do
1:33:20return. Now the problem is though that
1:33:23my application of the fundamentals
1:33:25>> might need to be very different to your
1:33:27application of the fund and that's where
1:33:29it generates endless debate because
1:33:31someone might do really well on low
1:33:33volume. Yeah,
1:33:34>> but someone else might need like super
1:33:35high volume, you know. So that's where
1:33:37you get these really entrenched camps.
1:33:39>> Yeah.
1:33:40>> Because although we all agree on the
1:33:41fundamentals
1:33:42>> Yeah. I need to focus on the compound
1:33:44lifts and you need to focus on
1:33:46specialization or vice versa. So that's
1:33:48where I think it it becomes just endless
1:33:51talk.
1:33:52>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So so through the mass
1:33:54monster era we see like Dorian Yates
1:33:56obviously who did the the Mike Menser
1:33:58hit high-intensity low volume thing. Um
1:34:01but then we also had Ronnie Coleman come
1:34:02through who did more of a power building
1:34:05but also super high volume training as
1:34:07well. Just brutal training. Um, and then
1:34:11you know you have Jay Cutler who was
1:34:12another really high volume guy as well.
1:34:15And and
1:34:16>> I don't know if I would describe his
1:34:18training as brutal necessarily as
1:34:20Ronny's or Dorian's, but it it felt a
1:34:23little bit more almost like a a call
1:34:25back to um uh
1:34:29who who was it.
1:34:30>> Lehaney. Yeah. Yeah. Um where it it felt
1:34:33a little bit more reserved in a way,
1:34:34like a little more intentional. I
1:34:35wouldn't want to say reserve because Jay
1:34:37obviously trained really hard but it was
1:34:38a little more like intentional a little
1:34:39less like anim animalistic. He he's a
1:34:41bridge between Ronnie and Phil Heath.
1:34:43Yes. For one of a better phrase because
1:34:45Jay's a super interesting dude because
1:34:47if you look at his training philosophy,
1:34:49he would have trained and he talks about
1:34:50this like very heavy on the compound
1:34:52lifts growing up and then he kind of
1:34:54moved away from that. But then he and
1:34:56he'll talk about this, you know, to beat
1:34:57Ronnie Coleman. He began to move back
1:35:00into
1:35:01>> very heavy weights, intense training
1:35:04just to try and overcome Ronnie who's
1:35:05obviously doing like 800 lb squats,
1:35:07deadlifts, like insane. So Jay kind of
1:35:10shifts. He kind of swings. Like he's
1:35:12very interesting in terms of how he
1:35:13swings across his career.
1:35:14>> Yes. Yes. Yes. That actually kind of
1:35:16gets back to what we're saying where
1:35:17it's like people try to
1:35:19>> I don't know if they try to. It ends up
1:35:20happening that people put you in a box.
1:35:22You have this training style, right? So
1:35:24like so right now
1:35:26>> in the zeitgeist my training style is
1:35:28very like machiny, very cable, very
1:35:31optimally, very like tweak oriented and
1:35:33technique oriented. If you were to go
1:35:34back even just four or five years ago, I
1:35:36was a power builder, right? like my my
1:35:38base was, you know, squats, bench press,
1:35:40deadlift, and all this kind of stuff.
1:35:42So, it does kind of depend on, I think,
1:35:43what season all of these people are in
1:35:45because if you train for 10, 20 years,
1:35:48like that's a that's a long time. 20 30
1:35:50years, that's a really long time. So,
1:35:51like you're
1:35:53>> you're going to go through phases of
1:35:55having different focuses during that
1:35:57time, right? That's kind of the secret
1:35:58sauce as well, you know, because a lot
1:36:01of fitness is generated at the beginner,
1:36:03>> you know, and it's kind of like this is
1:36:04what you're doing for the next six weeks
1:36:05or the next 12 weeks and you speak in
1:36:07absolutes because they need to hear
1:36:09>> absolutes. When you're starting off, you
1:36:10don't want to hear, well, how should I
1:36:12train? Well, you know, we can do this
1:36:14and we can do that. You know, it all
1:36:16kind of works, you know. So, just figure
1:36:18it out.
1:36:18>> That's terrible advice.
1:36:19>> Yeah. So, you know, when you have a
1:36:21beginner, you're like, okay, we're doing
1:36:22>> It's true.
1:36:23>> Yeah.
1:36:24>> It's true that Yeah. It kind of all will
1:36:25work. You have to train hard going to
1:36:27inform anybody on that because you know
1:36:29it's it's not specific enough to hear
1:36:32that. Yeah. Exactly.
1:36:33>> And you know you could be five for five
1:36:34anything you know but then when you
1:36:36start to train a little bit longer you
1:36:39know there might be limitations that you
1:36:40need in your training. There might be
1:36:42different goals that you're trying to
1:36:43achieve. There might be outside
1:36:44stressors which we never accept in
1:36:46fitness space that people have a life
1:36:47outside of their six-pack.
1:36:49>> You know training changes and it's meant
1:36:51to change as well because you're
1:36:52becoming more nuanced in training. Like
1:36:55if you were to look at how you train now
1:36:57and you know you compare it to 5 years
1:36:59ago but even if you were to go back to
1:37:00power building right now which you are
1:37:02sorry
1:37:04>> but you would probably be approaching it
1:37:05so differently and people can't see the
1:37:08internal change what happens and I think
1:37:09it's really interesting when you see a
1:37:11beginner starting to figure out like a
1:37:12deadlift and then you see them like five
1:37:14or six years later and even if it looks
1:37:16on the outside's fairly similar you're
1:37:18like their bracing is different they're
1:37:20stacking their like internally they're
1:37:22getting a lot more from that movement
1:37:23Yeah,
1:37:24>> but that's why it's really hard because
1:37:26people just like those like Phil Heath
1:37:28never trained hard. I'm like I mean he
1:37:30trained pretty hard but he's using
1:37:31machines. You just think it should have
1:37:33been Ronnie because we all grew up with
1:37:35Ronnie's training videos or you know you
1:37:37look at someone you say Arnold did this.
1:37:39It's like no but Arnold also did all
1:37:41these other things.
1:37:43>> Yeah. It's it's the thing that's the the
1:37:44key insight is that like people don't
1:37:46have access to the the subjective inside
1:37:49right. So it's like they don't realize
1:37:50that it's like
1:37:52>> I actually got had quite a few injuries
1:37:54I had to work around. So it's like that
1:37:55was it. That was the impetus. It wasn't
1:37:57that Yeah.
1:37:59>> Yeah. Yeah. So it's like, you know, that
1:38:00that that was like, okay, let me find
1:38:03another way that I Oh, luckily, you
1:38:05know, the the best research shows we can
1:38:06still build muscle. You don't have to
1:38:07squat. You don't have to deadlift.
1:38:09There's so many different ways to do it.
1:38:10And so then that brings on like a
1:38:12different training style for me and and
1:38:14you know, in some of the things that I
1:38:15that I show and so on and so forth.
1:38:16doesn't mean that like that is the Jeff
1:38:18Nipper training style, right? I think
1:38:19you can be flexible as long as you
1:38:21understand the core principles.
1:38:22>> And this is something that because when
1:38:23I talk and they do let me talk um to you
1:38:26know exercise scientists or strength
1:38:27strength coaches or conferences and
1:38:29different things, my number one takeaway
1:38:31is to not be dogmatic and I always use
1:38:33the back squat as an example because
1:38:35when I got into training, my knees were
1:38:37not allowed to go over my toes. Do you
1:38:38remember that whole thing?
1:38:40>> And I would squat in front of a wall
1:38:41with the coach and like a you know and
1:38:43he'd be knocking me back. My knees were
1:38:45not allowed to train or go track over my
1:38:46toes because that was dangerous. There
1:38:48was only one way to back squat. It
1:38:50didn't matter if I was six foot and my
1:38:51training partner was 5'6. Knees behind
1:38:53toes no matter what.
1:38:54>> Yeah.
1:38:55>> And then my knees got sore.
1:38:57>> Yeah.
1:38:58>> Really sore because it didn't suit me.
1:38:59And I began to experiment with different
1:39:01types of squatting because we've always
1:39:03had different types. And you know, you
1:39:04said when I was injured, I could do this
1:39:06or this.
1:39:07>> For me, that's where the value of
1:39:08history and science comes together
1:39:10because it's a toolbox, right? Because
1:39:12the body's dumb meat, you know, and it's
1:39:14not like, well, you know, Conor's doing
1:39:16front squats today, but I really wish he
1:39:18had done like a back
1:39:20>> squat. The body is dumb meat.
1:39:22>> Well, you know, in terms like stimulus.
1:39:24>> Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. It doesn't know
1:39:26what what you're thinking. It doesn't
1:39:27know. It doesn't know
1:39:30>> the muscle experiences tension, right?
1:39:32Like it doesn't it doesn't know exactly
1:39:33what exercise you're doing in three
1:39:35dimensions.
1:39:36>> It's not like, damn, I really wish he
1:39:37did hack squats today. Like, I was
1:39:39really looking forward to that. But
1:39:40that's where the tool box comes in
1:39:41handy, right? Because you're like,
1:39:42"Okay, so I'm doing squats today, but
1:39:44I'm going to do front squats because,
1:39:45you know, maybe I'm having some issues
1:39:47with my back or I'm going to do
1:39:48squats because I really want to isolate
1:39:49the VMO or I'm doing this, you know?" So
1:39:51the toolbox becomes important,
1:39:53>> but we often just want the and it's a
1:39:56human it's a human uh a human condition.
1:39:59We want the certainty that there's one
1:40:01way. Yeah.
1:40:02>> There's one way to squat, there's one
1:40:03way to train, there's one way to
1:40:04deadlift, there's one way to eat or you
1:40:06know uh exercise. But the reality is if
1:40:10you're in it for the long haul, and I
1:40:11would hope everyone is in it for the
1:40:12long haul in whatever way, shape, or
1:40:13form that takes, you need to adapt and
1:40:16vary over time.
1:40:18>> And it's hard to That's where we go back
1:40:19to the beginner. We're like, there's
1:40:21four movements you just need to do that,
1:40:23you know, do that for 12 weeks, then
1:40:24you're fine. Now, we're going to do five
1:40:26movements.
1:40:27>> But for the longer you're in your
1:40:28season,
1:40:29>> Yeah.
1:40:30>> the more you need to adapt and dance,
1:40:32you know, and kind of react to what's
1:40:34happening with you.
1:40:35>> Yeah. Exactly. Um, okay. So when let's
1:40:37flash forward to the final era here. So
1:40:39now we're in the modern era. So let's
1:40:40just call that like
1:40:42>> 2010s onward or something. Okay.
1:40:44Whatever. Yeah. The social media era.
1:40:46Let's let's call it the social media
1:40:47era. As a historian, I really do want
1:40:49your honest opinion on the social media
1:40:53era of fitness.
1:40:55>> Everything is wonderful. My captors are
1:40:57treating me very well. No. So let's do
1:41:00pros and cons. Okay. Um pros of social
1:41:03media era. uh for the first time in
1:41:04recorded human history, knowledge around
1:41:06exercise is democratized. So what I mean
1:41:08by that is anyone can now figure out how
1:41:11to train, how to program, how to
1:41:13optimize their training without talking
1:41:15to anyone. Now I would like people to
1:41:17interact because isolation is
1:41:19increasing. But compare that to when I
1:41:21got into lifting in the 90s and early
1:41:222000s. It was really hard to join a gym.
1:41:25Uh, I had to go up to the personal
1:41:27trainer and just rely on them or a Joe
1:41:29Weider magazine or Muscle and Health or
1:41:31Men's Health or the big guy in the gym.
1:41:33>> Yeah.
1:41:34>> My So, I've done two natural
1:41:35bodybuilding shows. My first natural
1:41:37bodybuilding show in the early 2010s in
1:41:38Ireland,
1:41:40>> salmon and broccoli.
1:41:41>> Yeah.
1:41:41>> Six times a day.
1:41:42>> Yeah.
1:41:43>> Right. So much salmon you can eat.
1:41:45>> Yeah. you know, I did another natural
1:41:47bodybuilding show in it was 2019 or 2020
1:41:49and like I had my calories down to, you
1:41:51know, the nth degree, but I was able to
1:41:54do that myself because the knowledge was
1:41:55so much easier to to get access to. So,
1:41:58social media has increased our
1:42:00individual abilities to empower
1:42:02ourselves in our training.
1:42:04>> Yeah.
1:42:04>> A beginner by look, circumstance, or
1:42:07whatever the case may be can go on a
1:42:08really good run of one to two years
1:42:10where they don't need to mess around.
1:42:11Like I went into the gym, you know, you
1:42:13kind of pick up dumbbell, you're like,
1:42:14I've seen people do this. Whereas now I
1:42:16have students who go into a gym and
1:42:18they're like, okay, so Monday's this,
1:42:19Tuesday's this, Thursday's this.
1:42:20Periodized. Wonderful. So like you can
1:42:23get on the on-ramp a lot quicker.
1:42:25>> Yeah,
1:42:25>> that's amazing. We should not take that
1:42:27for granted because that was not the
1:42:29case. We were always beholden to Sande
1:42:31with his 5B dumbbells. Joe Weider, buy
1:42:34my supplement. It's not steroids, it's a
1:42:36supplement. Here's the workout that
1:42:37Robbie Robinson did. Even though he
1:42:39never did that, I'm just writing, you
1:42:40know, clap drop. Really good.
1:42:42>> Yeah.
1:42:43>> Where social media has, you know, its
1:42:46problems. Obviously, there's the
1:42:48professional wrestling of fitness
1:42:51spaces, you know, the kind of fake
1:42:53feuds, the trying to tear people down,
1:42:55saying something salacious to get eyes
1:42:57on you. You know, if it bleeds, it
1:42:58leads. So, trying to create controversy,
1:43:01trying to create like tension within the
1:43:03fitness industry to drive traffic is a
1:43:05problem. The democratization of fitness
1:43:08has problems with it especially around
1:43:11steroid knowledge. There are a lot more
1:43:12people going on steroids at a much
1:43:14younger age. Now there's personal
1:43:17preferences etc. I accept all that body
1:43:19autonomy. I do get uneasy with how young
1:43:21people are getting on anabolic steroids
1:43:23and the access that they're getting.
1:43:24>> Yeah.
1:43:25>> And because access is or knowledge is
1:43:27democratized
1:43:28>> there are more people claiming expertise
1:43:32than is probably the reality. So if you
1:43:35think of your own journey and how over
1:43:38time you've, you know, become more and
1:43:40more knowledgeable about this, people
1:43:41have seen you grow along this journey.
1:43:43They've seen how you've accepted some
1:43:45things and dropped things that you
1:43:46previously held on to.
1:43:48>> But then there's also someone who's
1:43:50taken steroids for the last six months
1:43:52and is selling you a 12-week program.
1:43:54>> Yeah. And if you're new to the space,
1:43:56you might know, oh, well, this per, you
1:43:57know, like an Eric or Jeff or whoever
1:43:59the case may be, has been around for a
1:44:00long time is, you know, has a certain
1:44:02level of credibility,
1:44:04>> but this guy looks really yucky and I
1:44:06want to look like him.
1:44:07>> That access of knowledge has
1:44:09consequences. And then you look at the
1:44:11amount of people hopping on an stairs at
1:44:13D, you know, using dangerous cycles. I
1:44:15know I sound like a Nancy Reagan ad
1:44:17right now, but it is it is a consequence
1:44:19of social media.
1:44:20>> Yeah. Yeah.
1:44:21>> And so that democratization is a
1:44:22double-edged sword. more people are able
1:44:24to get leaner, bigger, stronger, more
1:44:26comfortable with their bodies, etc.,
1:44:27which is wonderful, but there are more
1:44:29harmful practices being shared more
1:44:31regularly because of that access to
1:44:33information.
1:44:33>> Yeah, totally. I I think um yeah, I
1:44:36think I broadly would agree with the the
1:44:38upside. Um
1:44:40uh I I do think yeah, it's good that the
1:44:43information is available if you want to
1:44:45find it. The problem is like, and this
1:44:47is increasingly the case, a lot of
1:44:49people don't really necessarily go out
1:44:51seeking the information. So maybe 5 to
1:44:5210 years ago, you might go search on
1:44:54YouTube how to bench press or what to
1:44:56eat to get leaner, right? And you would
1:44:58get a video that would be pretty good um
1:45:00most of the timeish or whatever, you
1:45:02know, like at least it was there, right?
1:45:03And if you had any kind of critical
1:45:04thinking, you could kind of weed through
1:45:05that. Um nowadays things are so much
1:45:09more algorithmically generated where
1:45:10what you're getting fed is just a
1:45:12infinite scroll feed and so what is
1:45:15given to you isn't really you know you
1:45:17use the word democratized it's it's not
1:45:19it's not really democratized according
1:45:21to what is most valuable or most
1:45:25correct. It's by what is going to get
1:45:27the most watch time. And so often that
1:45:29does end up being incorrect information
1:45:31because it does drive more division. It
1:45:33drives more conversation. it you you get
1:45:36people like rage baiting and all this
1:45:37kind of stuff, right? So, I think that
1:45:38while it's true that the information is
1:45:40all out there if you want to make an
1:45:41honest effort to find it and that's
1:45:43good, a lot of people nowadays are just
1:45:45getting their information fed to them on
1:45:47the basis of what is going to keep them
1:45:49on the app the longest, which is not a
1:45:50good thing. And that's the key point
1:45:52because when it's Joe Weider or Bob
1:45:54Hoffman or John Balick or anyone who's
1:45:56holding the knowledge in the 70s and 80s
1:45:58with their magazines, they're still
1:45:59fitness people.
1:46:00>> Whereas the algorithm
1:46:02>> like this could all be about Lego. You
1:46:04know what I mean? Like like the
1:46:06algorithm doesn't care, right? It's
1:46:07like, "Oh, more people are watching the
1:46:08Lego content. Okay, happy days. Angry
1:46:10Lego content. There has to be angry Lego
1:46:12content. Angry Lego content. We're going
1:46:14to lead people to that." You're right
1:46:15with fitness. The gatekeeper is an
1:46:17algorithm which is not about fitness.
1:46:20It's about engagement.
1:46:22>> So that that obviously creates like a
1:46:24lot of problems. And it's funny because
1:46:25sometimes I'll watch some of the rage
1:46:26batty stuff and I'll be like, well, I
1:46:28don't know anyone who and then I'll talk
1:46:29to my students and they're hopping from
1:46:31one program to the next. I'm a hardcore
1:46:33trainer, not a science. I'm like,
1:46:35>> what's h but it's because the as you
1:46:37said, the infinite scroll and trying to
1:46:39get
1:46:40>> expertise in that is kind of tricky.
1:46:42>> Yeah, it is. Um Yeah. And then I think
1:46:45another negative that actually ties in
1:46:46with the you know abundance of steroids
1:46:48that we see is is a I would say a very
1:46:52skewed fitness standard. Now I'm curious
1:46:55what you think about this from a
1:46:56historical perspective. Maybe it was
1:46:57always the case that like the people saw
1:46:59the best physique. It was Sandow in in
1:47:02the late 1800s on through it was Arnold
1:47:05in the 70s and like that was the
1:47:06standard. But I feel like I feel like
1:47:08now with social media you are really
1:47:11seeing the gen like a lot like
1:47:14everybody's on social media, right? So
1:47:15it's like you're seeing hundreds if not
1:47:18thousands of incredibly high level
1:47:19physiques and it can lead to the
1:47:21impression that that's actually normal.
1:47:23Right? It's gotten to the point where
1:47:24it's like
1:47:26I'm a pro-natural bodybuilder. I've
1:47:28competed in professional natural
1:47:30bodybuilding shows. I've won Canadian
1:47:32national shows. I've done six
1:47:34competitions. I've done six powerlifting
1:47:35events, like placed gold medals at
1:47:39several events
1:47:40>> on social media. Now, I'm kind of seen
1:47:42as like you this is an achievable look.
1:47:45Like it's it's actually not that
1:47:46impressive for how long he's been
1:47:47lifting. Like, you know, this is like
1:47:50good. You know, this is like standard,
1:47:52right? And it's like, man, these
1:47:54standards have gotten crazy. Even in the
1:47:5510 years that I've been on social media,
1:47:57you know, it's gone from like Jeff is
1:47:59100% fake natty, like his physique is
1:48:02just too good to nowadays being like I
1:48:04definitely get criticized more for being
1:48:06like small and undersized and it's like
1:48:09my FM is 24, bro. Like it's like, you
1:48:11know, so the the standards have gotten
1:48:14very much inflated. Have you do you
1:48:16think that that's true as a historian or
1:48:18>> I've seen people say with Frank Zayn's
1:48:21physique well you can achieve that
1:48:22naturally and like I've like freaks
1:48:24exist you know natural body job but
1:48:25people like oh you know in a couple of
1:48:26years you can I'm like
1:48:28>> Frank Zayn
1:48:30literally like one of the most aesthetic
1:48:32Frank Zayn is achievable naturally in a
1:48:34few years.
1:48:35>> So I I think you're absolutely right.
1:48:37It's the
1:48:38>> ability to not compare in your immediate
1:48:41space
1:48:41>> is really hard. So, you know, you're
1:48:43seeing because the pool is so much
1:48:45bigger and there's more people in
1:48:47weightlifting and there's more people in
1:48:49bodybuilding and powerlifting than ever
1:48:51before. So, the skewing of it is just
1:48:54insane. And it goes back to that thing I
1:48:55was saying when I started out 2, three,
1:48:56four, two bench, three squat, four
1:48:58deadlift. That's your strength
1:48:59standards. You hit that you're, you
1:49:01know, if you go 3, four, five, out of
1:49:03this world.
1:49:03>> And to be clear, those are actually good
1:49:05strength.
1:49:05>> They're good. No, for sure. They're
1:49:06really good strength standards, but like
1:49:08it took me a very long time to hit a 200
1:49:10kilo deadlift. And then I can go online,
1:49:12oh, there's a 16-y old
1:49:13>> I know
1:49:13>> doing it. And like you'll get because
1:49:15you'll get someone like an Ed Cohen who
1:49:16supposedly deadlifted like 160 to 200
1:49:19kilos his first time in a gym, right?
1:49:21>> But he's a beginner at that stage.
1:49:23>> Yeah.
1:49:23>> But so you're always going to be
1:49:24comparing yourself. Social media, it's
1:49:26not just in fitness. Like comparison is
1:49:28a thief of happiness.
1:49:29>> But the the standards have inflated
1:49:32>> to the point of absurdity. Yeah, it
1:49:35>> at at this point. Whether it's strength,
1:49:36whether it's physique, whether it's
1:49:38speed or athleticism, it really has
1:49:40gotten beyond proportion because what
1:49:42you'll have is, you know, I'll chat to
1:49:43my students about this like I just I
1:49:45feel really weak, I feel really strong.
1:49:47And I'm like, who are these people in
1:49:49your gym right now
1:49:51>> who are outlifting you or look better
1:49:53than you? And I'm like, you shouldn't
1:49:54obviously,
1:49:55>> you know, not have ambition.
1:49:58>> Yeah.
1:49:58>> But it does need to be contextualized
1:50:00because the 16-year-old who's
1:50:01deadlifting 200 kilos, he's not in my
1:50:04gym. like I've never interacted with
1:50:06them but now suddenly I feel worse
1:50:07because I'm comparing and that's another
1:50:09consequence of social media because it
1:50:10keeps you engaged on it you know the
1:50:12more
1:50:13>> unsettled you are with your own physique
1:50:15the more likely you are to engage with
1:50:17the algorithm or in dangerous practice
1:50:20>> and the truth is and I'll be a little
1:50:21bit of a you know an annoying academic
1:50:25there's a quote in Tolto's book which is
1:50:28time and patience so the French forces
1:50:30are retreating from Russia and there's
1:50:32one general who's like can we get them
1:50:33now can we get them now can we get them
1:50:34know, and the other general says, "No,
1:50:36time and patience. That's how we're
1:50:37going to defeat them.
1:50:38>> Time and patience would be a pretty good
1:50:40motto in fitness, but because you're
1:50:41like, well, they're
1:50:43>> they're better, you know, they're
1:50:44stronger, they're leaner, they're more I
1:50:45need to get that. I We're in such a
1:50:47rush. And because the pool has gotten
1:50:49bigger, as you said, someone will look
1:50:50at you who's certifiably
1:50:53has won things, you know, like and like
1:50:55you don't, you know, you don't win if
1:50:57you're not at a certain standard and be
1:50:59like, yeah."
1:51:01Like really, like this is where we're at
1:51:03now. But it's Frank Zane, you know, it's
1:51:05it's anyone.
1:51:07>> And it's so difficult, especially now
1:51:08with filters, with synthol and all of
1:51:11these different things going on.
1:51:12>> Yeah.
1:51:12>> Was that always a thing though? Like
1:51:14that was what I I like is that is that a
1:51:16new thing? I know it's it's it seems
1:51:17like it's gotten worse, but like did
1:51:19people always think that like if I work
1:51:21out for 12 weeks, I'm going to be able
1:51:23to get I'm going to be able to look like
1:51:24that. Cuz I remember even like my dad
1:51:26saying that to me like he he bought a
1:51:28magazine in maybe the
1:51:31>> late '7s or something, right? and he he
1:51:34was like get these arm get abs in 12
1:51:36weeks and like he thought it would just
1:51:38just happen you know um so yeah like
1:51:41have the standards kind of always been
1:51:42skewed through time
1:51:44>> yeah if we look at you know Sunday's
1:51:46books or his workout equipment um
1:51:48pamphlets he had a drawn illustration of
1:51:50his body he would say these are my
1:51:52measurements match your measurements to
1:51:55my measurements because I'm certifiably
1:51:57the world's most perfectly developed
1:51:58specimen
1:51:59>> in the 1920s and 1930s you had a lot of
1:52:01people writing about the ideal
1:52:03standards. Now, sometimes they'd say,
1:52:05well, you know, in Greece there's the
1:52:06golden ratio and you need to build your
1:52:08body like this. Or they'd say, well,
1:52:09Steve Reeves body is this. Let's see if
1:52:11can we match your body to this certain
1:52:13standard. So, we have always looked for
1:52:16a standard.
1:52:17>> Now, the difference is now there's no
1:52:20clear voice, you know, like at least
1:52:21when Sando said
1:52:23>> build a body like mine in 12 weeks or 24
1:52:26weeks,
1:52:27>> there was one Sando,
1:52:28>> you know, and other people were like
1:52:30that's the most perfectly developed
1:52:31specimen. Whereas now there's no real
1:52:34like torchbearer for you know listen
1:52:37we've all agreed as a collective fitness
1:52:39community that this is the standard and
1:52:41we'll measure deviations of this.
1:52:43>> So I think that's where it's different
1:52:45now is because it's much more
1:52:48>> chaotic and you can be in a little like
1:52:49silo where you and 20,000 other people
1:52:52think it's this but you know some 50,000
1:52:55over here think it's something
1:52:56completely different. So that's where
1:52:57social media has differed. But like the
1:52:59physique standards, you know, you have
1:53:01the first before and after physique
1:53:03photos in the 1850s.
1:53:04>> Oh wow.
1:53:05>> Do you know what I mean? So like we've
1:53:06always had a standard and we've always
1:53:07tracked it. They were measuring soldiers
1:53:09chests in the 18.
1:53:11>> So we've always looked for a standard.
1:53:12Yeah.
1:53:13>> But now it's just so chaotic.
1:53:16>> Yeah. Sure. I um I had a conversation
1:53:18with a 19-year-old because I'm I'm doing
1:53:20a video about 100 people who've set New
1:53:23Year's resolutions and we're going to
1:53:24see them throughout the whole year. or
1:53:26see how many actually follow through.
1:53:27Okay. Um and and one of them is is, you
1:53:29know, this 19-year-old and uh he wants
1:53:32to get more ripped and jacked and so on
1:53:34so forth, right? Um and he was saying to
1:53:36me like he was like, "Ah, that's this
1:53:38thing, man. Like I don't know what's
1:53:39wrong with my diet, but like he's like I
1:53:41I have the six-pack, right? But like I
1:53:43can only see it if I'm under like I can
1:53:45only see the bottom two under good
1:53:46lighting and if I flex." He's like, "If
1:53:49I just relax, you can only see the top
1:53:51four."
1:53:52>> And I'm like, "Brother, who are you
1:53:53following, my man?" like this is you
1:53:56like
1:53:58>> where do I begin with this, you know?
1:53:59It's just it's just so skewed. And I
1:54:02think that that is it. I think that
1:54:03like, you know, in the infinite scroll,
1:54:04man, like yeah, you're going to get fed
1:54:07the cream of the crop and some of this
1:54:09cream of the crop is not even real.
1:54:10Whether in the sense that they don't
1:54:11look like that now, they only look like
1:54:13that for a very short period of time and
1:54:14they're just infinite posting that um or
1:54:17it's just literally manipulated. Yep.
1:54:19Right. Um, and like Photoshop AI, like
1:54:23you you now it's you can even manipulate
1:54:25stuff with video. Like it's not just
1:54:26like lighting and angles anymore. Like
1:54:28it's it's pretty crazy. Yeah.
1:54:30>> And we've always had that. Like a good
1:54:32friend of mine, Rachel Ozarkskovich, has
1:54:34looked at photoshopping in the 1910s.
1:54:36They take a photo of themselves and they
1:54:38just start to smudge some of the
1:54:40outline, you know? So we've always had
1:54:42>> great
1:54:43>> this desire to embellish but as you say
1:54:46now there's just so much more
1:54:48sophistication with it and they're using
1:54:50some of the techniques from bygon eras
1:54:53photoshop lights angles you know after a
1:54:56Mr. Olympia, Joe Weider would take
1:54:58dozens and dozens and dozens of
1:54:59photographs of someone in different
1:55:00settings, different contexts, and then
1:55:02trickle them out throughout the year so
1:55:04they look good year round.
1:55:05>> But they're doing it in a much different
1:55:07like technology space. And as you say,
1:55:10the way it just skews
1:55:12>> everything and even it's they're not
1:55:14even getting it in fitness anymore
1:55:15because, you know, in TV and film, all
1:55:19the action movie stars are pushing this
1:55:21kind of physique standard as well. And
1:55:23like, God love him. Frank Gillow did a
1:55:25thing with Men's Health where he was
1:55:27like, "I take TRT and people like, "Oh
1:55:30my god, an actor finally admitting to
1:55:32steroid use."
1:55:33>> So, he did the TRT thing. And then he
1:55:35was like, "But I also train really hard
1:55:37and I push myself and I watch my diet."
1:55:39It's like, "No, Frank, that's all true.
1:55:42We're also taking steroids." And like,
1:55:44you know, changes the equation, my man.
1:55:46>> Yeah.
1:55:46>> So, it's not just a fitness thing.
1:55:48You're getting it. You're getting
1:55:50musicians, you know, doing body
1:55:52transformations, actors, you're getting
1:55:54advertisements for random things doing
1:55:56it. Like my friend is a nurse. She
1:55:58follows a nurse influencer who's selling
1:56:00her workout programs.
1:56:01>> You kind of can't escape it anymore. And
1:56:03I think that reinforces the like body
1:56:06dysmorphia we've all agreed on.
1:56:08>> Yeah. Yeah. So, what's the what's the
1:56:10antidote for that in the social media
1:56:11age? Like delete Instagram, delete Tik
1:56:13Tok, or is there something else?
1:56:15>> Tear down the walls, Jeff. Tear down the
1:56:17walls. I don't know. Like I I wish I had
1:56:21a magic wand. I would hope that people
1:56:23would understand that ultimately they
1:56:24are an N of one. Yeah.
1:56:26>> And what I mean by that is, and I
1:56:27remember chatting to Eric Helms about
1:56:29this. We're actually talking about Ed
1:56:30Cohen. You know, when he was at an
1:56:32intermediate stage, he was probably
1:56:33pulling like 6 or 700 lb in a deadlift.
1:56:36Someone else at an intermediate stage
1:56:38might be pulling like 180. Like, you
1:56:40know, depending depending on their base.
1:56:42They're both intermediates. They might
1:56:43have both pushed themselves in training.
1:56:45They might be monitoring their diet,
1:56:46etc.
1:56:47If the 180 deadlifter compares
1:56:49themselves to Ed Cohen, forget about it.
1:56:51Like just give up. Just give up now. If
1:56:53they compare themselves to six months
1:56:55ago,
1:56:56>> yeah.
1:56:56>> So, and it's a really hard grounded
1:56:58message. But I think they can you learn
1:57:00from others, but you compare to
1:57:02yourself.
1:57:02>> Exactly.
1:57:03>> And it's really hard to get that across
1:57:04to people.
1:57:05>> It is hard to get that across. Um, yeah.
1:57:07I I think like if you're following
1:57:09fitness, like if your goal is to improve
1:57:11your physique, you want to follow
1:57:13fitness content that that educates you.
1:57:16I think it's okay to get motivation from
1:57:19different physiques, but like I think
1:57:21you don't want to put pressure on
1:57:23yourself to look like any other person
1:57:25because you can't like every single
1:57:27person has like even in the cream of the
1:57:30crop like you like
1:57:32>> Ronnie Coleman could never get Phil
1:57:35Heath's triceps, you know what I mean?
1:57:36Like so even when you're looking at the
1:57:38elite level, like you you should really
1:57:40only compare yourself to your starting
1:57:42place. And this is the thing and you
1:57:44know Larry Scott his muscle bellies
1:57:46basically started at his elbow you know
1:57:48like you can see the bicep basically
1:57:50starts right here.
1:57:51>> You can do a million and one preacher
1:57:55curls which Larry Scott credited with
1:57:57that.
1:57:57>> You're not going to change this.
1:57:59>> True.
1:58:00>> But again in fitness because we always
1:58:01need inspiration. We always need a
1:58:03tentpole. We always try and think well
1:58:06if I follow this program I will look
1:58:08like this. And it's hard to shift away
1:58:11from that because that's how the
1:58:12industry has always
1:58:13>> maintained. But I think it's coming to a
1:58:15bit of a breaking point in some respects
1:58:17online because there's just so much
1:58:19happening.
1:58:20>> Yeah.
1:58:20>> And there's so many different physiques
1:58:21that I would like to think that people
1:58:23will engage with the content but then
1:58:25compare
1:58:27>> by themselves or with a friend.
1:58:29>> Sure. Sure. Um Okay. So, one thing I did
1:58:32want to talk to you and since we're on
1:58:33the social media thing, um, I don't know
1:58:36if you've noticed, like Mike Mensor's
1:58:38hit is super popular again now, okay?
1:58:40And there I've noticed this like I I've
1:58:42been on social media for 10 years now
1:58:44and like things come in these cycles and
1:58:47many cycles, right? So, it's like, you
1:58:49know, I've seen
1:58:51>> training to failure be really popular,
1:58:53then not be popular, then be super
1:58:55popular again. And it does come with
1:58:57this like emotional onslaught and
1:58:59attachment to these things. But there
1:59:01are these cycles, right? So it's like
1:59:03really interesting that like Mensor's
1:59:05hit which originated in like the late
1:59:07'7s, early 80s, um
1:59:09>> is now you know 20 wait not 20 45 years
1:59:13later
1:59:15>> not just like hey there's like a niche
1:59:17group of people doing this. It's like
1:59:18the mainstream thing on TikTok, right?
1:59:21Um, are there any other examples that
1:59:23you can think of of things that have
1:59:25been like from history have come back
1:59:27through and people just really latched
1:59:28on to again?
1:59:29>> We've used functional fitness in a
1:59:32variety of ways in the last 20 years to
1:59:34the point where I want to scream. So
1:59:36functional fitness in the early 2010s is
1:59:38about single leg work, you know, single
1:59:40limb work. It might balance work,
1:59:42coordination, core, but we'd always use
1:59:44some variation of, you know, you have to
1:59:45be functional. Well, it doesn't matter
1:59:46if you have like a 500 lb deadlift if
1:59:48you can't, you know, pick up the
1:59:49shopping bags and then blah blah.
1:59:52Functional fitness then becomes
1:59:53CrossFit.
1:59:54>> CrossFit then becomes high rocks, you
1:59:56know, and we just keep reinventing
1:59:58functional without understanding that
1:59:59fitness is specific. Fit to do what?
2:00:02Because a powerlifter is fit to
2:00:04powerlift. A weightlifter is fit to
2:00:05weightlift. A bodybuilder is fit to look
2:00:07yucky on stage in the most delightful of
2:00:09ways. So functional fitness is
2:00:11definitely something that just gets
2:00:12reinvented. Yeah. And we use a new
2:00:14modality. We'll use some like catchy
2:00:17thing. You know, Greg Glassman in
2:00:19CrossFit was like, I don't care if you
2:00:20can deadlift 300 kilos. I I care if you
2:00:23can deadlift 200 and then run a
2:00:24fiveminute mile. We'll always use some
2:00:26new benchmark. Whatever Hi Rocks does.
2:00:27It's flashing lights and it's expensive.
2:00:29I'm sorry I don't. But functional
2:00:31fitness is one. And then remove a
2:00:33macronutrient.
2:00:35>> Oh,
2:00:35>> is always one. Like Dan John, God bless
2:00:38Dan John as a voice of reason, but he'll
2:00:39be like just walk through the like diet
2:00:41books in a bookstore. Bookstores still
2:00:43exist, people. And just you can see like
2:00:46lowfat, low carb, high protein, you
2:00:48know, he's like just pick a macro
2:00:49macronutrient. People are fiber maxing
2:00:52now, which I find so funny because like
2:00:55>> talk about fafo, you know, like mess
2:00:57around, find out like you overload on
2:01:00fiber like
2:01:01>> Yeah, I didn't I haven't seen that one.
2:01:02>> Yeah, the body keeps the score on fiber.
2:01:04But macronutrient we say cycling right
2:01:07is always a really popular thing. And
2:01:09then there is the new supplement you
2:01:11know so it's
2:01:13>> the new pro hormone. It's the new you
2:01:16know exoteric thing with ingredients
2:01:19from a country that you've not heard of.
2:01:22>> The new supplement revolution is a big
2:01:24thing. And like honestly if we look at
2:01:26supplements okay so like steroids work
2:01:29shock horror. Health risks attached to
2:01:31that as well of course. But then if you
2:01:33look at like supplements that change
2:01:35like move the needle
2:01:36>> protein powder but not in a necessarily
2:01:38physique way but in a convenience way.
2:01:40Creatine does move the needle in a
2:01:42physique way but not
2:01:43>> a little bit
2:01:43>> like not you know but like not to the
2:01:45extent that it gets marketed at
2:01:46pre-workout you feel locked in.
2:01:48>> Yeah. Sure.
2:01:49>> Fish oils your joints might hurt as much
2:01:50like the the supplements are not
2:01:52necessarily night and day.
2:01:54>> Yeah. But because steroids come about in
2:01:56the 1950s at the same time as
2:01:57supplements,
2:01:59>> we always think the supplement needs to
2:02:01be jaw-dropping. You know, the
2:02:03supplement has to be 20 pounds of
2:02:05muscle, 10 pounds of weight loss, 40
2:02:08pounds to your total. Because the people
2:02:10who are marketing the supplements were
2:02:11marketing with steroids,
2:02:13>> real supplements.
2:02:13>> So if someone's like, "This supplement
2:02:15adds
2:02:17>> 10 pounds of lean muscle in 28 days."
2:02:18You're like, "Oh, so it's a steroid."
2:02:20Like gen because we've never had a legal
2:02:22supplement.
2:02:23>> Yeah. that has moved the needle. Even
2:02:25something like a federan gets banned,
2:02:26you know. So supplements are another one
2:02:29of those things that cycle through the
2:02:31new discovery. They'll oftenimes use a
2:02:33very loose understanding of science and
2:02:35then they'll smack on like a
2:02:37jaw-dropping claim. Yeah.
2:02:38>> To that. So that's another one that will
2:02:40cycle in and out alongside hit alongside
2:02:43functional training. They're like the
2:02:45and low carb, low fat, high protein. You
2:02:48don't need to eat as much protein as we
2:02:50usually thought. just like ma, you know,
2:02:52majoring in the minors on
2:02:54macronutrients. They're like the big
2:02:55things, but it's always a breakthrough.
2:02:57Yeah.
2:02:57>> It's always a reaction against
2:02:58something. Even let's be honest, the
2:03:00>> weird tension between bro science and,
2:03:03you know, evidence-based science or
2:03:04hardcore training. It's like,
2:03:06>> but this is just a reaction to this. And
2:03:08the difference is obviously so social
2:03:10media accelerates that.
2:03:12>> Yeah.
2:03:12>> So, hit comes really popular again in
2:03:15the mid 90s when we have internet
2:03:16forums,
2:03:18>> like prebodybuilding.com forums. It's
2:03:20HIT Jedis is what they're called. See
2:03:22some of those.
2:03:23>> You don't. It's a dark
2:03:24>> It's a dark It's a dark place, right?
2:03:26You think 4chan is bad.
2:03:28>> Yeah.
2:03:28>> But, you know, the social media kind of
2:03:30accelerates that. So, Mike Manser might
2:03:32drop away now, but he might come back
2:03:33again in a year and a half because
2:03:35there's just so much content being
2:03:36produced that I feel that the trends and
2:03:39the cycles have gotten smaller. As you
2:03:40said, many cycles come around more and
2:03:42more and more.
2:03:43>> Yeah. Yeah. Agree. Agree. All right. So,
2:03:45I'm I'm curious now. What does Connor
2:03:47Hefernan think is the best era? What
2:03:50what physiques do you think wait now how
2:03:53should I phrase this? Which era do you
2:03:54think produce the best physiques?
2:03:57>> Like it's ours like so you know so I
2:03:59will give you the grounded reality and
2:04:01then a preference of mine.
2:04:02>> Sure.
2:04:02>> The grounded reality is 2026.
2:04:05>> People have never been as lean. They've
2:04:06never been as strong. They've never if
2:04:08we're talking about bodybuilding they've
2:04:09never presented on stage with that much
2:04:10muscle mass, that much leanness and that
2:04:12much skill in posing.
2:04:14>> Okay. powerlifting, Olympic
2:04:16weightlifting, strong man, strong woman.
2:04:18>> It's just it's a verifiable fact because
2:04:20there's more people doing it. So,
2:04:22objectively, it's this age.
2:04:24>> Go us.
2:04:26>> From a philosophical point of view, for
2:04:29me, it would probably be the 1930s,
2:04:311940s because I love the idea of a John
2:04:35Grimick physique. I love the idea of
2:04:37someone who's muscular, lean, but not
2:04:39too lean, but is also engaged in some
2:04:41form of and I'm just after ragging on
2:04:44functional, but like the idea of being
2:04:46lean enough to be impressive, but
2:04:48athletic enough to lift heavy weights.
2:04:49Yeah.
2:04:50>> For me, that's kind of my preference.
2:04:51And then when they would pose, the
2:04:53posing was so different. It was more
2:04:55about hitting an artistic ideal than,
2:04:57you know, from being on stage, tense
2:04:59every single bit of your body. Yeah.
2:05:01Whereas you look at the most famous John
2:05:03Grimmik pose. He's leaning against a
2:05:04pillar. He has one bicep up like this.
2:05:06He's not even really tensing his body
2:05:08that much because it's there's more of
2:05:10an aesthetic artistic. So like my
2:05:11preference is 30s, 40s. My objective
2:05:14evaluation is obviously now because
2:05:16>> uh 18year-old powerlifter now would be
2:05:20turning heads in the 1980s. So it's
2:05:22objectively now.
2:05:24>> Yeah, that's a good that's a good point.
2:05:26Um I think as far as like yeah I would
2:05:28agree that objectively now especially if
2:05:30you consider like um
2:05:33>> like the breadth of success like you
2:05:36know the the top 20 on a bodybuilding
2:05:39stage now are all amazing you know um
2:05:42and then if you were to get a top 100
2:05:44they would all be amazing too. It's it's
2:05:45just so many impressive physiques now.
2:05:48Um
2:05:49>> I think my favorite era was probably
2:05:52like late 70s early 80s. Like I like the
2:05:54I like the Arnold actually probably
2:05:56before 80s probably probably like early
2:05:58'7s pumping iron.
2:05:59>> Yeah, I like the pumping iron. I like
2:06:01Franco Columbo and like I know that
2:06:03those physiques were not natural but
2:06:05like they're also not
2:06:07>> mutant looking, you know, like they
2:06:10actually to me that's like
2:06:12>> peak physique, you know, not quite
2:06:14achievable like for a natural, but at
2:06:17the same time
2:06:18>> Yeah. Yeah. like not there's no like
2:06:20obvious signs of like extreme abuse, you
2:06:23know, of drugs. So, um I would say that
2:06:25would be like aesthetically that would
2:06:27be my favorite era. Um
2:06:30>> but the more I get into like reading
2:06:33about some of the like early culture, it
2:06:35it's so fascinating. There's so even
2:06:37just speaking to you now, I'm like,
2:06:38"Wow, like there's so much that I could
2:06:40learn about this stuff." Like you you
2:06:41have such a deep grasp on all of this
2:06:44stuff. I mean, I guess you would. It's
2:06:45all you do. That's all.
2:06:46>> Yeah. No, it's it's it's truly
2:06:49incredible. I'd love to have you back on
2:06:50and do this again, man. Like I'd love to
2:06:53I'd love to explore some more of the
2:06:54like societal stuff that we kind of
2:06:56touched on like and and some of the
2:06:58global impacts of this, you know, the
2:07:01like get get a little more into the
2:07:03history. Like I feel like this was a a
2:07:04nice like overview, but I feel like your
2:07:06your knowledge on this just runs so
2:07:08deep. I've never spoken to somebody who
2:07:10knows all this stuff because it is like
2:07:12it it has to be a small field, man. Like
2:07:15I feel like, you know, in the
2:07:16science-based
2:07:18world, like we have a lot of people who
2:07:20are like exercise physiologists and
2:07:21nutritionists and this kind of thing,
2:07:23like I don't know how many historians
2:07:24there are in this area. You're the only
2:07:27one I think I know.
2:07:27>> Thank you for letting me do a shout out.
2:07:29So Jan Todd and Terry Todd who are at
2:07:31the University of Texas. Terry
2:07:32unfortunately passed away a number of
2:07:34years ago. They're kind of the pioneers
2:07:35within the space alongside a man called
2:07:37David Webster. You then have people like
2:07:39uh David Chapman who wrote a biography
2:07:41on Eugene Sand which is wonderful. John
2:07:43Far has written a number of books.
2:07:44Muscle Town USA, Mr. America just
2:07:46written a new book called The Es
2:07:48Strength. You have people like Rachel
2:07:49Ozerkovich, um Charles Stalking. There's
2:07:52about 10 of us, you know, if anyone's an
2:07:54Arrested Development fan. There are
2:07:55dozens of us, dozens, you know, at the
2:07:57G.
2:07:58>> So, it's a really small field. More
2:08:00people are beginning to come to it and
2:08:02you'll start to see a lot of really good
2:08:03like popular histories of fitness
2:08:05emerging. There's a wonderful journalist
2:08:07with New York Times, Danielle
2:08:08Freriedman. Um, there's a woman Natalie
2:08:10I can't begins with P and ends in A. I
2:08:12can't remember her surname. She wrote a
2:08:14really good book, but it's
2:08:15>> What's the book?
2:08:16>> Fit Nation.
2:08:17>> I I actually have that. I haven't read
2:08:19it yet, but yeah,
2:08:20>> really good book. She's a good podcast
2:08:21as well. So, more people are beginning
2:08:23to come to it because fitness is
2:08:25becoming to quote Thanos undeniable, you
2:08:28know, because
2:08:29>> you're starting to see it in obviously
2:08:30gym cultures, but education like Toronto
2:08:33airport has a a gym in it. So, it's
2:08:35beginning to become harder to ignore. So
2:08:37even when I started doing my PhD 2016
2:08:392019, a historian who's a very
2:08:42respectful historian, he or she sat down
2:08:44with me and said, "I don't think what
2:08:46you're talking about mattered." And she
2:08:48and they he or she was like, "I don't
2:08:51mean that you're not good at what you
2:08:53do. I just don't really see why this
2:08:54matters. Like, why should we care about
2:08:56this?" A couple of years ago, I bumped
2:08:58into them and their their child had
2:09:00gotten into weight training. They're
2:09:01like, "Oh, I get this now because it can
2:09:03be so all-encompassing for the
2:09:05individual." So if you don't know
2:09:07fitness, it's hard sometimes to
2:09:09understand why you would study it. If
2:09:10you have a a glancing familiarity with
2:09:13it, I think you get it. So there's more
2:09:15people coming to it, but really as a
2:09:17field, it's the late 80s, early 90s, and
2:09:20it's people like Jan Todd and Terry Todd
2:09:22who are powerlifterss turned historians
2:09:24who like break the ground for us. Terry
2:09:27wrote the first PhD on physical culture
2:09:29in the US. So, it's a really small
2:09:31field, but it's becoming more popular
2:09:34because fitness is becoming harder to
2:09:36ignore.
2:09:36>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's well said.
2:09:38Before we wrap up, I want you to tell me
2:09:39about a couple of these things we've got
2:09:40scattered on the table here. So, so what
2:09:43this is just the one that's closest to
2:09:44me. What is this?
2:09:45>> So, this book that we have here, which
2:09:46is Super Strength by Alan Calvert. So,
2:09:48we've mentioned Alan Calvert before.
2:09:50He's the man who creates the first
2:09:52mainstream fitness manufacturing plant
2:09:54in the US, creating barbells and
2:09:56dumbbells. You can see one of his early
2:09:58kettle bells from Milo Barbell. And
2:10:00Calvert's really interesting because he
2:10:02was a 5B dumbbell guy,
2:10:04>> but he realized that it was complete
2:10:06hokum. So Alan Calvert saw Eugene Sando
2:10:10at the Colombian World Exposition 1893.
2:10:13He said, "I want to look like that. I
2:10:14want to build a physique like that." He
2:10:16did the 5B dumbbell sticktick for a
2:10:18little while. He's like, "My man's lying
2:10:20here." You know what I mean? He's like,
2:10:21"Say less. I know I need to lift heavy
2:10:23weights." So he starts to manufacture
2:10:25dumbbells and barbells and he starts to
2:10:27build physiques like this.
2:10:29>> I mean this is insane like
2:10:30>> for early 1900s and he has you can hold
2:10:33on to that. He has Milo barbell but he
2:10:35produces strength magazine the first
2:10:37mainstream weightlifting magazine 1914
2:10:40in the US and he starts to promote heavy
2:10:42weight training because he's selling
2:10:44barbells and dumbbells right like
2:10:46there's a business element to it but you
2:10:48can see here some of the movements that
2:10:49he's promoting. Incredible.
2:10:51>> And you can see the exercises. So you
2:10:53can see the two-handed deadlifted
2:10:55weight. And this is heels together
2:10:56again.
2:10:57>> Oh yes. Let's see. So this was the
2:10:58deadlift technique you were talking
2:10:59about.
2:11:00>> Really, really close with the feet
2:11:02flared out.
2:11:03>> Exactly. But you can see him promoting
2:11:05around the same time that five pound
2:11:07dumbbells exist. Yeah.
2:11:08>> And Alan Calbert's so funny because he
2:11:11believes in lifting weights. He has his
2:11:14own strength standard. So he says here,
2:11:15you know, in a book which I wrote a
2:11:16dozen years ago, I said that the average
2:11:18amateur man 170 pounds should be able to
2:11:20lift a 250lb barbell above his head with
2:11:23both hands.
2:11:23>> Sheesh, that's hard.
2:11:24>> Yeah. Right. He's like, come on. Um
2:11:27>> Yeah.
2:11:28>> But he then turns against weight
2:11:29training and weightlifting. And
2:11:31actually, this is very serendipitous. He
2:11:34starts to focus on muscle um control.
2:11:37>> This physique is insane, by the way.
2:11:39Like just look at the back development
2:11:40here. Like I I I'm not joking. Like if
2:11:42if this guy was on social media today,
2:11:45there's no way people would believe he's
2:11:46natural.
2:11:46>> Yeah. And even better, so Otto Arco was
2:11:49part of a new generation who did muscle
2:11:51control. So if you've ever seen people
2:11:52who do the stomach vacuum, that's a
2:11:54really
2:11:55>> entrylevel move into muscle control.
2:11:58They could like
2:12:00>> modulate the, you know, so you've seen
2:12:02so the ab muscles, the right side stays
2:12:04out while the left side stays in. They
2:12:06could do it with their lats and the back
2:12:07muscles. So one side would stay flexed,
2:12:09the other side would kind of concave in.
2:12:11But Calbertt, he produces a book
2:12:13eventually called The Truth About
2:12:14Weightlifting where he starts to say,
2:12:16"Well, you don't need to lift heavy
2:12:17weights.
2:12:18>> You should focus on like muscle control
2:12:20and concentration when you're training."
2:12:21So, he actually falls away from heavy
2:12:24weight training and becomes completely
2:12:26disillusioned, sells his magazine, sells
2:12:27his barbell company. But this is really
2:12:30like one of those early lift heavy, use
2:12:33barbells, use dumbbells, and you can
2:12:35build Sandow's physique over Eugen
2:12:39Sandow, you know, 5B dumbbells, etc. So,
2:12:42it's a really important like early
2:12:45origin story for strength-based training
2:12:47in America.
2:12:48>> So cool. So cool. And when was when was
2:12:50this?
2:12:50>> This is like 1910, 1914, give or take.
2:12:53>> And this an original copy?
2:12:54>> This original copy. Wow. Only the best
2:12:55for Jeff. Only the best. I bring you the
2:12:57best. Okay. So, this is the sand these
2:12:59are Sandow's dumbbells here.
2:13:01>> These this is the because when you buy
2:13:03Sandow's dumbbells, it would come with
2:13:04the dumbbells themselves. We have a
2:13:05wonderful cloth that Sandow gives so you
2:13:07could polish your dumbbells. So, I hope
2:13:09you're polishing your weights in the
2:13:10light and dark side of your gym, Jeff.
2:13:12But this is the original polisher of the
2:13:14Sando dumbbells.
2:13:15>> Oh, this is what you would polish it
2:13:17with.
2:13:17>> Well, you mean it's got to be spark.
2:13:18>> What's the point of polishing it? Just
2:13:20just so it looks pretty.
2:13:21>> You know, you're in your room by
2:13:21yourself, you have your cloth, you're
2:13:22just polishing your dumbbell. You know,
2:13:24it's fine. like people. So, you'd get
2:13:26your polished uh dumbbell, you would
2:13:28have your cloth, and then you'd have
2:13:29your exercises. So, here's a funny one
2:13:32for you, right? And this is actually
2:13:33your tippy toe squat, which we have
2:13:36here.
2:13:37>> So, Sandow's workout. Compare that to
2:13:39Alan Calbert, who's publishing a couple
2:13:41of years later. It's like lightweight
2:13:43dumbbells in your hand, tippy toe
2:13:45squats, sit-ups, push-ups, kind of like
2:13:47a lunging overhead press where you'd
2:13:49stick one leg forward and push overhead.
2:13:52This is probably the most influential
2:13:54workout system.
2:13:55>> Yeah.
2:13:56>> of the first half of the 20th century.
2:13:58>> Incredible.
2:13:59>> Because sando is selling all over the
2:14:00world and they're all getting a book or
2:14:02a variation of this book. So, it's
2:14:04probably one of the most done workouts
2:14:06before the 1960s, 1970s.
2:14:09>> It's really neat how they, you know,
2:14:10they got the the the technique demos
2:14:12here and they they do a tracing. Oh,
2:14:14I've I've actually never seen that. The
2:14:16>> trace lines. Well, it's funny because
2:14:17how do you teach people an exercise
2:14:19without a video, right? So sometimes
2:14:21they do sequential shots, you know,
2:14:23barbell on the ground. Sometimes it
2:14:24would be uh a finished shot. So one of
2:14:27my favorite things comes in 1970s.
2:14:29Someone's trying to teach Olympic
2:14:30weightlifting. So it's d it's barbell on
2:14:32the ground and then barbell overhead
2:14:34>> and then text for what to do in between.
2:14:36>> Wow.
2:14:37>> Whereas these are again trying to figure
2:14:38out how do we teach people how to lift
2:14:40weights
2:14:42>> without video, without coaching. And
2:14:44again, this is one of the most done
2:14:47workouts using these. You left a little
2:14:50scuff mark there and you're polishing.
2:14:51We'll get we'll get it later. You know,
2:14:53one of those
2:14:54>> the polish rag needs a polish.
2:14:56>> It's It's been through the war. I mean,
2:14:58you be 100 years old and still look at
2:15:00your true.
2:15:02>> So, that's one of those early workouts.
2:15:04So important. And then over here,
2:15:06>> hold on one second. I need to say, so we
2:15:08have Sandow's concentrated embroation.
2:15:13>> Yeah, the heck is that?
2:15:14>> You and the bros, you watch the game,
2:15:15you embroate yourself. Embro.
2:15:17>> It's a It's a m It's a basically like I
2:15:20call it deep heat. You know, like if you
2:15:22had a sore muscle, you'd rub the cream
2:15:23on and it would Is that what it is?
2:15:25Yeah. So, that was one of actually one
2:15:26of the first supplements that strong men
2:15:28and strong women promoted in the 1880s,
2:15:301890s was basically like muscle rub, you
2:15:33know, like, oh, like my elbow's a bit
2:15:34sore. I'm going to rub. So, he sold
2:15:36embroation.
2:15:37>> This guy was a hustler. I didn't know he
2:15:39had so much going on.
2:15:40>> Jay-Z, I'm not a businessman. I'm a
2:15:42businessman.
2:15:42>> Okay, these look really old. What do we
2:15:44have here?
2:15:45probably the best marketing campaign in
2:15:49fitness bar none. So if I called you uh
2:15:52you know 34 or was it the 84 pound
2:15:56weakling
2:15:57>> would you know what that means or just
2:15:58be like Connor's being heard now I've
2:15:59heard it before. No I thought it was 99
2:16:0298 pound weakling. This is it. This is
2:16:04Charles Atlas.
2:16:05>> Oh okay. Okay.
2:16:06>> So in the 1930s Charles Atlas and his
2:16:08business partner Charles Roman create
2:16:10the most
2:16:11>> like viral fitness campaign arguably
2:16:14ever. It's a series of cartoons that
2:16:15shows a young man at a beach with a
2:16:17woman. Bullies come over, throw him to
2:16:20the ground, kick sand in his face. He
2:16:22goes away, does the Atlas workout, comes
2:16:24back, defeats the bullies, get the girl.
2:16:26>> Yeah.
2:16:26>> Atlas would have advertisements in comic
2:16:28books, fitness magazines, newspapers
2:16:30saying, "I can make a He-Man out of you
2:16:31in 12, you know, 12 weeks, whatever the
2:16:34case may be." He would sell these are
2:16:37called mail orderer workouts. So, you'd
2:16:39sign up and every month you would get a
2:16:41new lesson from Charles Atlas. And he's
2:16:44a really interesting cat because he
2:16:46would sell uh body weight only
2:16:48exercises. So his system was entirely
2:16:50body weight only. So no equipment
2:16:52needed. It was oftentimes he'd call it
2:16:54dynamic tension. So instead of a bicep
2:16:56curl with a dumbbell, you'd have one
2:16:58hand, you know, pointed up here. I'll do
2:16:59it for the camera. Other hand pointed
2:17:01there. And you'd push.
2:17:02>> Wow.
2:17:02>> Kind of like isometric early isometric.
2:17:05>> Okay.
2:17:05>> But Atlas sold books around the world.
2:17:08He sold these mail order workouts
2:17:11because there was no equipment needed.
2:17:13More people could do it. And like Sando,
2:17:15he is a global figure and these were,
2:17:18you know, so widespread. He had offices
2:17:20in New York or in America and in London.
2:17:22He hired, you know, hundreds of people
2:17:24to deal with the volume of letters that
2:17:26he was getting. So he was one of those
2:17:28people who again just helped to nudge
2:17:30fitness more into the mainstream. Now,
2:17:32he can be controversial for some people
2:17:34because he would say dumbbells and
2:17:35barbells don't work, which obviously
2:17:36you're going to say if you're selling
2:17:38something that's the antithesis of it.
2:17:40>> There was actually a court case between
2:17:42Bob Hoffman of York Barbell and Charles
2:17:44Atlas about who was telling the truth
2:17:46about their systems. The judge threw it
2:17:49out because the two men were bickering
2:17:50so much and at one point Atlas did a
2:17:52handstand to show how effective he was.
2:17:55But again
2:17:57>> brings more people into fitness like
2:17:58Sando like Arnold like Jane Fonda raises
2:18:01people's awareness and also willingness
2:18:03to exercise right because for so long
2:18:07people thought weight training or you
2:18:09know would make you muscle bound
2:18:10uncoordinated athletic coaches would say
2:18:13don't do that and Jason Shirley Jan Todd
2:18:15and Terry Todd have a book called the
2:18:17invention of uh strength training
2:18:19>> which talks about this but people like
2:18:22Atlas Sando Arnold etc just kind nudge
2:18:25people, you know, it's okay. You can
2:18:27lift, you know, you can you can take
2:18:28time to work out. You can build muscles.
2:18:30You can build your physique. And this is
2:18:32important because he marketed them in
2:18:34comic books,
2:18:35>> in mechanic weekly magazines, in
2:18:38newspapers, not necessarily even in
2:18:40fitness, but it was in the mainstream to
2:18:42the extent that like the Rocky Horror
2:18:44Picture Show,
2:18:44>> which my we're about the same
2:18:46generation. I'm a nerd. I really like
2:18:48Rocky Horror Picture Show. Take a jump
2:18:49to the left. They reference Charles
2:18:51Atlas in it in the 1970s. There's a song
2:18:53called Charles Atlas which is making fun
2:18:55of kind of the Charles Atlas of the
2:18:561930s. So he punches into mainstream
2:18:59American culture.
2:19:00>> Yeah. Yeah. That's that's what I want to
2:19:02do with the the lab and everything, you
2:19:04know, um
2:19:06in a less uh
2:19:08in a less charlatan driven way. Not to
2:19:10say that he was a charlatan, but there
2:19:12seems like there was like a little bit
2:19:14of um
2:19:15>> Well, there's marketing and there's
2:19:17always marketing with that. And this is
2:19:19the thing where I say fitness has always
2:19:20had marketing embedded in it. Yeah.
2:19:23>> And there are many roads to the
2:19:24mountaintop, you know, and if it's
2:19:25Atlas, and there's a great book produced
2:19:27by Charles Gaines, who wrote pumping
2:19:28iron
2:19:30>> about Atlas and his system, and it does
2:19:32show people who had transformations with
2:19:33it, you know. So, like, who am I to to
2:19:35judge that when other people have had a
2:19:37transformation, but there's always been
2:19:38marketing like, you know, and there's
2:19:40always been
2:19:41>> Blaster Biceps, perfect your body, etc.
2:19:43to
2:19:44>> hook people into Yeah. that. And you can
2:19:46see it. So, like the one of the last
2:19:48things I have there is a magazine from
2:19:501898.
2:19:51>> Oh, wow. Is that what this is?
2:19:52>> One of the first Yeah, this is what this
2:19:54is.
2:19:54>> This is from 1898.
2:19:56>> One of the first fitness magazines. Now,
2:19:58Sando publishes magazine uh Sando's
2:20:00magazine of physical culture in around
2:20:02this time as well. But this is like one
2:20:04of the early fitness points and you can
2:20:06see in it
2:20:07>> advertisements for workout equipment,
2:20:09right? You can see physique photos, you
2:20:11can see articles on how to train in it.
2:20:13So, we've always had these different
2:20:16ways of marketing fitness
2:20:18>> and they've evolved over time. more
2:20:20people have come into it. But again, you
2:20:23can just see that what we're doing did
2:20:25not come out of the ether in, you know,
2:20:282011 or 2012. There's been 150 years of
2:20:31people figuring it out. We've dropped
2:20:33stuff away. So, to your point, Jeff, you
2:20:35know, what does, you know, people might
2:20:36ask, what does science bring? What do
2:20:39you see being marketed there that uh
2:20:41raise
2:20:42>> literally see sausage revelations,
2:20:45putrid cats meat used in their
2:20:47manufacturer? Um, oh man, how about your
2:20:51wrist? Yeah, this is this is crazy. I
2:20:54would need to,
2:20:55>> but you know, when you're like, well,
2:20:56what a science added. You can see how
2:20:59people market certain things that don't
2:21:00exist anymore. We've dropped them by the
2:21:02wayside.
2:21:03>> Even,
2:21:04>> man. I'm not even going to lie, though.
2:21:05Like, they have, you know, like, why not
2:21:07an arm like this? And it's just, you
2:21:08know, a guy with some biceps here, you
2:21:10know. Um, get the McFaten chest
2:21:13developer. Very strong.
2:21:15>> Very strong. Not not medium strong. Very
2:21:17strong. That's crazy. Wow.
2:21:19>> So, the marketing exists in tandem with
2:21:22the good information and it kind of
2:21:23always has.
2:21:24>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So interesting, man.
2:21:26So interesting. All right. Um I think
2:21:28I'll wrap it up there if if there's
2:21:29anything you want to you want to
2:21:31mention. I'm really curious like where
2:21:33where can people follow you or what's
2:21:34the best way to like get access to your
2:21:36your knowledge base?
2:21:38>> I'm dreadful online, but I have my own
2:21:40website, Physical Culture Study, which I
2:21:42started in 2019 or 2014, pardon me. I
2:21:44have a Substack. You can find me on
2:21:46Twitter. That's basically it for me.
2:21:47Now, the thing that I care more about is
2:21:49people engaging with this knowledge. So,
2:21:51the strongmanp project.com started by
2:21:53the University of Texas in collaboration
2:21:55with Rogue Fitness. Strongmanpro.com,
2:21:57free online archive. Anyone can use it.
2:21:59You'll find old workouts, biographies,
2:22:01everything there.
2:22:02>> The Stark Center at the University of
2:22:04Texas has free digital aids. Strength
2:22:06magazine, which was started by Alan
2:22:08Calvert in 1914, the full run of
2:22:10Strength Magazine for 10 years is there.
2:22:12Click in PDF is there. You have people
2:22:14like um Marcus Kmenu, I know you've done
2:22:17something with barbell films. Oh yeah.
2:22:18Uh Golden Era Bookworm does a lot of
2:22:20good stuff. The Titan Slacks of Desco
2:22:22Ban. It's just a website that's been
2:22:24running for 20 years with just new
2:22:26articles from the 60s,7s, 80s, 90s that
2:22:29you can find. So there's a lot of good
2:22:31information that people can freely
2:22:33access. Even archive.org, you can type
2:22:35in bodybuilding PDF and you'll get
2:22:36Sando's book or Alan Calver's book or
2:22:38Arthur Saxon. And the reason why I think
2:22:40it's valuable for people to engage with
2:22:42the knowledge, not necessarily the
2:22:44historian,
2:22:45>> is I think it adds perspective to
2:22:47everything that we do. I think it gives
2:22:48you more tools for your training, more
2:22:50exercises. I think it gives you
2:22:52perspective.
2:22:52>> Yeah.
2:22:53>> And I think it just encourages you to
2:22:56not be dogmatic
2:22:57>> because how can you know the single one
2:23:00way to do something
2:23:01>> if no one has gotten there in 150 years?
2:23:04So, Strongman Project, Stark Center,
2:23:06Titan Slack, Descoan, Marcus Kment,
2:23:09Physical Culture Study, and then there's
2:23:10a ream of books by David Chapman, John
2:23:12Far, John Todd, Jason Shirley, Shannon
2:23:15Walsh, all of these people. So, please
2:23:16just go out and experience a little bit
2:23:19of the individual.
2:23:20>> Yeah, I know. I know. I'm going to I'm
2:23:22going to I'm going to get a list from
2:23:23you of all the stuff you just mentioned.
2:23:24I'll put it in the description box. And
2:23:26I'm going to order all the books that
2:23:27you just said cuz this is like a whole
2:23:28new area of intrigue for me. And I'm
2:23:31kind of regretting that I'm this deep
2:23:32into my fitness career. And I I'm only
2:23:34just now getting interested in this. But
2:23:35I guess it's better late than never. And
2:23:37you know, I mean, at a certain point,
2:23:39it's like, okay, well, how much more
2:23:40time do I, you know, want to invest in
2:23:43chasing like the final few millimeters
2:23:45on my biceps? A bit. A bit of time.
2:23:48>> But then, you know, with the rest of the
2:23:50time, I can uh I can start learning
2:23:52about this stuff. Yeah. Exactly. Okay.
2:23:53So that that's fantastic, Connor. I
2:23:54really really do appreciate it. Um yeah,
2:23:57for anybody still listening, um I'll
2:23:58link all that stuff down below. Um if
2:24:01you are not yet subscribed, make sure
2:24:03you subscribe. Um and leave us a thumbs
2:24:06up if you enjoyed it. And I'll see you
2:24:07guys all here in the next

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of How People Got Jacked From 1900 To Today by The Jeff Nippard Podcast, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 30,741 words across 4,640 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to translate the transcript into 100+ languages.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, translation to 100+ languages, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.