How Not to Hurt—Live Presentation — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00"How Not to Hurt Presentation"
- 0:10So, you are going to be the first audience ever
- 0:13to see this talk, which is so cool.
- 0:16At the same time, it's like, I don't have any timing.
- 0:20I don't know if the jokes are gonna work, you know, so--
- 0:22But, whereas at the end of the year, you know,
- 0:25it's memorized, I'm walking around the stage,
- 0:27and I got it perfect, but by then,
- 0:29it's like a year old, and so--
- 0:31Anyway, there's benefits to both, I guess.
- 0:34(audience laughing)
- 0:35All right.
- 0:37Are you ready?
- 0:39(cheering)
- 0:44(hums)
- 0:46Pain is such an epidemic...
- 0:51that at it's height,
- 0:53U.S. doctors were handing out
- 0:55250 million prescriptions a year for opioids
- 1:01in a country where the entire adult population
- 1:04was only 240 million...
- 1:08contributing to the opioid crisis
- 1:11that may have killed hundreds of thousands of people.
- 1:16It was a story of good intentions gone bad,
- 1:20a drug industry gone rogue,
- 1:22and government watchdog agencies gone to sleep.
- 1:28What I discovered, writing How Not to Hurt,
- 1:32is that this same story applies to much
- 1:37of modern pain management.
- 1:39A litany of drugs, devices, and procedures
- 1:42that sometimes do more harm than good,
- 1:46acknowledged to be worse than useless,
- 1:49yet continue to this day.
- 1:54Allow me to run through a few examples
- 1:56before getting to the good news,
- 2:00that there are some safe, simple,
- 2:01side-effect free strategies
- 2:03that we were just never taught about in medical school,
- 2:05because there was no corporate budget
- 2:07driving their promotion.
- 2:10We can start with over-the-counter painkillers,
- 2:14like ibuprofen, which may collectively
- 2:17kill tens of thousands of Americans every year
- 2:21from ulcers, strokes, heart attacks.
- 2:25Tylenol is considerably safer,
- 2:27yet remains the only over-the-counter drug
- 2:29that leads reliably to death at overdose
- 2:33from liver failure, though even at so-called
- 2:37safe recommended doses in healthy volunteers,
- 2:41about a third experience
- 2:42clinically significant liver damage.
- 2:46And surprisingly,
- 2:48Tylenol may cause similar amounts
- 2:50of gastrointestinal bleeding
- 2:53as NSAID drugs like ibuprofen, naproxen, aspirin.
- 2:56Stick a scope down people's throats,
- 3:00and you can see extensive damage in the lining of the stomach
- 3:03and intestines in 90% of individuals taking aspirin,
- 3:07buffered or not, at the recommended doses.
- 3:12How many hours does this take for damage to occur?
- 3:16None. It can happen within five minutes.
- 3:20No wonder 10-30% of people who regularly take NSAIDs
- 3:25develop stomach ulcers.
- 3:29If deaths, from the cardio-- excuse me,
- 3:32the gastrointestinal toxic effects from NSAIDs
- 3:35were tabulated separately,
- 3:38they would constitute the 15th leading cause of death
- 3:42in the United States.
- 3:44Something you can buy at any corner store!
- 3:49Okay, so even over-the-counter drugs can be risky,
- 3:52but we're willing to swallow risks for effective treatments.
- 3:57The question is, how effective are they?
- 4:01For back pain, for example,
- 4:03the amount of relief from NSAIDS compared to a sugar pill
- 4:06is considered not clinically relevant,
- 4:10and they may actually increase the risk of chronic pain.
- 4:16Treating acute pain with anti-inflammatory drugs
- 4:19like ibuprofen may ironically prolong the pain.
- 4:24In other words, "Anti-inflammatory drugs
- 4:26could cause chronic pain."
- 4:30Acute inflammation is a natural process
- 4:33that triggers healing and actually protects
- 4:36against the development of chronic pain,
- 4:39which may explain why back pain patients treated with NSAIDs
- 4:42appear to have a 76% increased risk
- 4:45of developing chronic back pain.
- 4:49Anti-inflammatory drugs can cause chronic pain.
- 4:55You know, we've long prescribed anti-inflammatory drugs
- 4:57on the very premise, "Look, if we allow the pain to persist,
- 5:01it could become chronic."
- 5:03But as a renowned Harvard neuroscientist noted,
- 5:06this new research suggests
- 5:07that the complete unexpected opposite,
- 5:10which is that the inflammation is actually helping.
- 5:14So, risky, no appreciable back pain relief
- 5:18and in fact, may even make the pain worse in the long run,
- 5:21yet these are the recommended drugs.
- 5:26Effectively all risk, no benefit,
- 5:28yet these drugs are recommended
- 5:29in 90% of clinical practice guidelines
- 5:33for acute back pain.
- 5:36So, this is the kind of thing that started clueing me in
- 5:39to the state of modern pain management.
- 5:44Surely, prescription drugs work, though.
- 5:50When a senior executive at drug giant GlaxoSmithKline
- 5:53admitted the dirty little secret
- 5:56that the "vast majority of drugs" in general
- 5:59don't work for most people, it set off a media firestorm.
- 6:03But, "This is of course no news to doctors,"
- 6:07the editor of a leading medical journal wrote,
- 6:11acknowledging the open secret
- 6:13that most drugs are ineffective for most patients.
- 6:18And it's even worse in the field of pain management.
- 6:23You know it's bad when the coordinator
- 6:26of gold standard reviews
- 6:28on Evidence-Based Pain Management
- 6:30starts off by quoting Colonel Jessup
- 6:34from A Few Good Men.
- 6:37"You can't handle the truth..."
- 6:43which is that "failure is the norm."
- 6:49Failure rates of painkillers for osteoarthritis
- 6:52range from 71-86%.
- 6:55These are the failure rates for individual patients.
- 6:58For chronic low back pain, 82-87% failure.
- 7:03For painful neuropathies, 70-87% failure rate.
- 7:08And fibromyalgia drugs failed 87-95% of the time
- 7:14to reduce pain even by 50% after months of treatment,
- 7:18compared to taking placebo sugar pills.
- 7:2090% of the time, couldn't even do that.
- 7:24The analysis concluded that the field of pain medicine
- 7:28needs to "confront its failings"
- 7:31and acknowledge that drugs cannot successfully
- 7:33treat more than a minority of people
- 7:38with painful conditions.
- 7:41What about suzetrigine, the first non-opioid painkiller
- 7:45approved in over 25 years?
- 7:48Well, it was approved under the same expedited
- 7:50FDA fast-track approval process as oxycontin,
- 7:55and it's worth noting
- 7:56that the last new class of painkillers included Vioxx,
- 8:00which was pulled from the market after causing
- 8:03maybe 100,000 cases of serious heart disease.
- 8:08This was after years of the drug giant Merck
- 8:11trying to silence critics, drawing up lists of doctors
- 8:16daring to question the drug's safety
- 8:18to be neutralized or discredited.
- 8:23As one executive VP wrote,
- 8:26"We may need to seek them out
- 8:28and destroy them where they live.”
- 8:32Nice.
- 8:35But hey, suzetrigine works, according to the press release,
- 8:40causing a clinically meaningful reduction in pain.
- 8:44An executive VP is quoted,
- 8:46"Suzetrigine has again demonstrated its potential
- 8:49to fill an important unmet need in the treatment of pain."
- 8:52After all, on the drug,
- 8:53sciatica pain drops from an average of 6 out of 10
- 8:57and highly significantly drops down to a 4,
- 8:59whereas the placebo group...
- 9:02(audience laughing)
- 9:04...starts out at a 6 out of 10
- 9:06and highly significantly dropped down to a 4--
- 9:09Wait a sec.
- 9:11So, the drug doesn't work at all.
- 9:17The drug, sold as JOURNAVX for $200,
- 9:20appears to offer exactly zero benefit.
- 9:24The press release could have just as accurately touted
- 9:27a "clinically meaningful reduction in pain"
- 9:30from sugar pills, right?
- 9:32Bragging that, once again,
- 9:35Smarties have demonstrated their potential
- 9:38to fill an important unmet need in the treatment of pain.
- 9:42(audience laughing)
- 9:47What about compounded drugs?
- 9:50Compounding has become an increasingly lucrative industry
- 9:53over the past two decades.
- 9:55Compounding pharmacies prepare custom-made medications,
- 9:57like topical pain creams,
- 10:00typically costing thousands of dollars.
- 10:02After spending six million dollars per day
- 10:05on these medications,
- 10:07the U.S. Department of Defense decided to put them to the test.
- 10:12Hundreds were randomized to pain creams
- 10:15compounded for all sorts of different pain conditions
- 10:18and they did not work any better than a placebo cream.
- 10:23So, basically, millions of dollars wasted every day
- 10:26on something that couldn't beat out moisturizer.
- 10:30(audience laughing)
- 10:32We inject millions of arthritic knees with steroids
- 10:36that ultimately offer only harm...
- 10:41making you more likely to end up
- 10:43having to get a total knee replacement
- 10:45because of the greater cartilage degeneration
- 10:49caused by the steroids.
- 10:51Any extremely short-term pain relief
- 10:54cannot possibly outweigh the long-term harms.
- 10:58The best time to have stopped using them was years ago.
- 11:01The second-best time to stop them is now,
- 11:04yet we continue to harm millions of patients with them.
- 11:12It's the same with arthroscopic surgery.
- 11:14Only documented long-term harms without benefits.
- 11:19The only actual reason to keep recommending steroid injections
- 11:23and arthroscopic surgery is the "status quo."
- 11:26But there is something badly wrong with the status quo
- 11:32in the treatment of our leading cause
- 11:34of physical disability among older adults.
- 11:37The same with steroid injections for tennis elbow
- 11:41resulting in worse clinical outcomes,
- 11:44and quadrupling the rate of recurrence.
- 11:47So, your doctor is not only making it worse,
- 11:50but quadrupling the chances it comes back.
- 11:54Now that's a business model.
- 11:57(audience laughing)
- 12:00Stop injecting corticosteroids into patients with tennis elbow.
- 12:05You're actively slowing down the healing.
- 12:09And a common surgery for tennis elbow is a sham too,
- 12:14compared to sham surgery, placebo surgery,
- 12:17where they cut you open, but don't actually do anything.
- 12:20The same with shoulders.
- 12:21Steroid injections for shoulder pain
- 12:23may have deleterious effects on rotator cuff healing,
- 12:28associated with up to seven times
- 12:30the rate of subsequent tendon tearing.
- 12:35Yes, a small, transient pain relief,
- 12:38but the potential to ultimately make the disease worse.
- 12:43So, why do doctors keep doing them?
- 12:47Their widespread use may be attributable to habit,
- 12:51under appreciation of the placebo effect,
- 12:53incentive to satisfy rather than discuss
- 12:56a patient's drive towards physical intervention,
- 12:58or because they get paid to do it.
- 13:03And rocking the shoulder surgeon's world,
- 13:06the most common surgery for shoulder pain
- 13:08found to be useless
- 13:10compared to placebo surgery, fake surgery.
- 13:13No improvement in pain, function, or quality of life,
- 13:17and, of course, actually worse than useless
- 13:19because there's always the risk
- 13:20for rare but serious side effects.
- 13:23Even surgery journal editorials started to say this surgery
- 13:27should not even be offered to patients
- 13:30because truly informed patients,
- 13:33offered no benefit, only harm,
- 13:37would avoid it.
- 13:39We first learned the surgery
- 13:41was effectively useless back in 1993.
- 13:43So, surely surgery rates plummeted, right?
- 13:48Surgery rates just shot up,
- 13:50and remaining to this day one of the most
- 13:52frequently performed shoulder surgeries in the world.
- 13:55How is that possible?
- 13:58Why would surgeons continue to do
- 14:00all-risk-no-reward surgeries by the millions?
- 14:05Why would surgeons be allowed to do them?
- 14:09Well, there's confirmation bias, the tendency to ignore evidence
- 14:15that doesn't support your beliefs,
- 14:16a lack of science literacy, some kind of magical thinking,
- 14:23as well as "perverse incentives" to operate,
- 14:26that are just kind of built into the system.
- 14:29You know, of all the thought
- 14:31put into disentangling surgeons' conflicts of interest,
- 14:34the most fundamental conflict
- 14:37may be the one most seldom discussed, right?
- 14:39Surgeons like surgery, and the more they operate,
- 14:45the more most get paid.
- 14:47And hey, look, if they want to take the moral high ground
- 14:50and not do an unnecessary surgery,
- 14:53another surgeon is just gonna step right in and do it, right?
- 14:57So, why not do it?
- 14:59A long-time editor of a prestigious medical journal
- 15:02started his editorial on conflicts of interest
- 15:05by describing a fantasy.
- 15:08"Doctors treat patients using simply the best evidence,
- 15:11and their experience.
- 15:13They are not influenced by money or self-interest."
- 15:16"This is, of course, nonsense."
- 15:22Consider this survey of orthopods.
- 15:25"Do Surgeons Treat Their Patients
- 15:27Like They Would Treat Themselves?"
- 15:30Presented with the same case, they were 80% more likely
- 15:34to recommend surgery for the patient,
- 15:36than they would choose to have to undergo
- 15:38the same procedure for themselves.
- 15:41The bottom line is that "every year,"
- 15:45wrote the editor-in-chief of the journal
- 15:46of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons,
- 15:48"hundreds of thousands of patients undergo unnecessary,
- 15:52unhelpful, painful procedures."
- 15:54And a subset of those patients will experience serious,
- 15:57sometimes catastrophic complications
- 15:59for operations they never should have had in the first place.
- 16:06And don't even get me started on how we treat back pain.
- 16:12(audience laughing)
- 16:14A magnum opus regarding the evidence on low back pain
- 16:18in one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world
- 16:21highlighted the massive gap that exists
- 16:24between what the evidence shows when it comes to low back pain,
- 16:28and the actual management in everyday care.
- 16:32It was a devastating critique,
- 16:36offering the "dramatic and disturbing messages"
- 16:40that "much of modern back care is ineffective
- 16:43or outright harmful,"
- 16:46leading to a "massive wave of disabling over-treatment
- 16:50and mistreatment."
- 16:51Strong evidence that drugs, devices,
- 16:54diagnostics, syringes, and surgeries,
- 16:56can be hazardous for most patients with low back pain,
- 17:01causing "harm to millions across the world."
- 17:06Sadly, even when treatments are overwhelmingly proven
- 17:11to be unhelpful or even harmful,
- 17:13it may take decades for practices to change.
- 17:18Why do these medical malpractices continue?
- 17:22Well, back pain is the single costliest chronic condition.
- 17:27In other words, it's the most profitable.
- 17:33Key challenges providing evidence-based care
- 17:35may be the financial interests of payers,
- 17:38providers, and corporate profiteers.
- 17:40For example, Pfizer's illegal marketing of gabapentin,
- 17:45the drug they sold as Neurontin.
- 17:48Internal documents show, "The campaign involved
- 17:50the systematic use of deception and misinformation
- 17:53to create a biased evidence base,"
- 17:55and to manipulate physicians' beliefs and behaviors.
- 17:58They pled guilty, but drug sales continue to soar.
- 18:03They paid a few hundred million in criminal fines, no biggie,
- 18:08as the drug was bringing in a few billion dollars a year.
- 18:14The use of these so-called gabapentinoids,
- 18:17gabapentin and pregabalin, sold as Neurontin and LYRICA,
- 18:20continue to be prescribed to treat low back pain,
- 18:24even though they demonstrate a significant risk
- 18:26of adverse effects without any demonstrated benefit.
- 18:31It's the same with muscle relaxants like Flexeril,
- 18:34which continue to be among the most common medications
- 18:37prescribed for low back pain,
- 18:39which makes sense based on the published data.
- 18:43But when researchers included the unpublished trials
- 18:47that the drug companies tried to sweep under the rug,
- 18:50about 90% of the benefit vanished into thin air,
- 18:54turning a respectable drop in pain of 20 points
- 18:56on a 0 to 100 scale down to a clinically insignificant
- 19:002 points out of a hundred.
- 19:02So, appreciable risk with no appreciable benefit,
- 19:06yet years after this revelation, we're still prescribing
- 19:10tens of millions of these drugs every year.
- 19:16To which you say, "Fine.
- 19:18If I ever have back pain,
- 19:19I'm going to a back pain specialist."
- 19:24Queue this paper.
- 19:26"Doctors with a Special Interest in Back Pain
- 19:28Have Poorer Knowledge About How to Treat Back Pain."
- 19:33What?
- 19:34Physicians who expressed
- 19:36particular interest in the subject
- 19:38were more likely to harbor back pain management beliefs
- 19:43"contrary to the best available evidence."
- 19:46"These findings raise serious concerns
- 19:48about how back pain is currently being managed."
- 19:54Medical device companies pay out more largesse to doctors
- 19:58than even the drug companies.
- 20:00Even though it's a much smaller industry,
- 20:02device manufacturers annually pay out
- 20:06a total of $900 million
- 20:09to 200,000 physicians in the U.S.,
- 20:11compared to the drug pushers
- 20:13who only gift physicians around $800 million a year.
- 20:18And the top recipients on that list,
- 20:20edging out even the orthopedic surgeons who get all the money
- 20:24from the knee and hip replacement companies
- 20:25are the neurosurgeons,
- 20:27who implant the spinal cord stimulators for back pain,
- 20:33which appeared to offer no benefit
- 20:36for back pain function or quality of life,
- 20:38stimulating only revenue.
- 20:44A surprisingly candid mea culpa editorial
- 20:48recently described
- 20:49the "overwhelming influence of industry"
- 20:52as a defining feature of interventional pain medicine,
- 20:56a field increasingly seen "as one driven more by industry
- 21:01than evidence,
- 21:02and by expedience rather than inquiry."
- 21:06On a payola-per-device basis,
- 21:08only coronary stents beat out
- 21:11implantable spinal cord stimulators.
- 21:14And based on sham trials, angioplasty and stents
- 21:18have been shown to unequivocally offer
- 21:20no benefit for stable angina chest pain.
- 21:26Wait, how do doctors convince patients
- 21:29to sign up for these procedures
- 21:31when they don't lower the risk of death or heart attack,
- 21:33or offer long-term symptom relief?
- 21:35Well, apparently, they do it by conveniently failing
- 21:39to inform their patients that they don't
- 21:42reduce the risk of death or heart attack
- 21:43or offer long-term symptom relief.
- 21:45What they do do, of course, is cause bleeding complications
- 21:49or damage to the blood vessel in 2 out of 100 people,
- 21:52and one poor schmuck will suffer a serious complication,
- 21:56such as a heart attack, stroke, or death.
- 21:59And during the first year after the stent,
- 22:02three will have a bleeding event
- 22:04because of the blood thinners you have to be on
- 22:05because you have foreign material in your body.
- 22:08Of course, the blood thinners don't always work,
- 22:09so two people will have their stent clog up,
- 22:12leading to a heart attack.
- 22:14But you don't have to wait to suffer damage.
- 22:17During the stent procedure itself,
- 22:19as many as 28% suffer irreparable damage
- 22:24to the heart muscle, as evidenced by MRI.
- 22:29Perhaps of even greater concern are the silent mini-strokes.
- 22:32About 1 in 7 stent patients
- 22:35come away with new brain lesions.
- 22:38And these so-called silent infarcts
- 22:41may actually not be so silent,
- 22:44contributing to memory loss,
- 22:46cognitive decline, and dementia.
- 22:49For stable angina,
- 22:52stents are all risk, no reward.
- 22:55Who in their right mind would get them?
- 22:56Who in their right mind would do them?
- 23:00Yet even now, after all the evidence is in,
- 23:02hundreds of thousands of these procedures
- 23:05are performed unnecessarily every year in the United States
- 23:08at a cost of billions of dollars,
- 23:11but billions in cost means billions in revenue.
- 23:16Risky, worse-than-useless interventions generate
- 23:20large revenue streams for hospital systems.
- 23:24It's like, wait, why are hysterectomies
- 23:27such a popular option for a range of female problems?
- 23:31Used as a treatment of first resort
- 23:36for fibroids, for example.
- 23:39Hospitals are businesses.
- 23:41It's like an open secret, right?
- 23:42They have a quota to meet every month,
- 23:45and the hysterectomy, a "well-priced procedure,"
- 23:48may seem a reasonable direction for an income boost.
- 23:52But, all right, back to stents:
- 23:53"It's been difficult
- 23:55for physicians to accept the evidence
- 23:57that, actually, there is no benefit
- 24:00compared to a fake procedure
- 24:02in this post-truth science era."
- 24:06But that's how they figured it out, right,
- 24:08compared to a fake procedure, compared to sham surgery.
- 24:12Fake placebo pills test whether drugs are effective;
- 24:16fake placebo surgeries
- 24:17test whether procedures are effective.
- 24:19There have been 25 such trials
- 24:21involving thousands of patients
- 24:23comparing various invasive procedures
- 24:26for the treatment of pain,
- 24:28most commonly low back pain, angina, arthritis.
- 24:32The conclusion?
- 24:33"It seems prudent that invasive procedures
- 24:36for chronic pain be avoided."
- 24:40When a former FDA commissioner was asked
- 24:43at an American Heart Association meeting
- 24:45whether sham controls should be required
- 24:47for the approval of all devices,
- 24:48he replied, "Do you want to get the truth or not?"
- 24:56Physical therapists
- 24:58use all sorts of questionable devices
- 25:02that clinical practice guidelines
- 25:04recommend strongly against.
- 25:05Like traction for low back pain,
- 25:07for which there is overwhelming evidence
- 25:10that it lacks clinically significant benefit,
- 25:12yet three quarters of physical therapists
- 25:15in the U.S. may use it.
- 25:18Similarly, chiropractic manipulation
- 25:21may not be all it's cracked up to be.
- 25:26Manual therapies, like chiropractic, osteopathic,
- 25:29don't seem to do much better than sham manual therapies.
- 25:34Or frankly, even compared to doing nothing at all.
- 25:38But, hey, manual therapy is safer than opioids.
- 25:45The fact that so many other back pain treatments
- 25:47are worse than useless
- 25:49is actually a pretty decent selling point.
- 25:52I mean, no, like, like, just worthless?
- 25:56Pfft, I'll take it!
- 25:57Right? I mean...
- 25:58(audience laughing)
- 26:00Back pain pa--and it's actually been tested--
- 26:02back pain patients going to physical therapists
- 26:04or chiropractors experience reduced risks
- 26:08from spinal injections and surgery,
- 26:10so the primary benefit may be avoiding
- 26:13the more harmful medical mismanagement of back pain
- 26:16(in which case, of course, you could get the same benefit
- 26:18sending them to a witch doctor or something).
- 26:20You know, right, but...
- 26:21The bottom line concluded the editorial board
- 26:24of one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world:
- 26:27"Over-reliance on drugs or devices
- 26:29may be spurred on by aggressive industry marketing
- 26:33and perverse financial incentives
- 26:35for shorter visits, drug prescribing,
- 26:37and invasive interventions."
- 26:41(sighing)
- 26:43Are you ready for the good news?
- 26:45(audience laughing)
- 26:47(applause)
- 26:51One of the success stories in pain medicine
- 26:54was the development in the 1990s
- 26:56of abortive therapies for migraine headaches.
- 26:58Drugs like sumatriptan, sold as Imitrex,
- 27:00only fail, like, 57 percent of the time.
- 27:03Guess what has been shown to work just as well
- 27:05in a randomized, double-blind,
- 27:07placebo-controlled clinical trial?
- 27:09Just an eighth of a teaspoon of ginger powder.
- 27:12I mean, you can hardly tell the ginger curve
- 27:14from the drug curve.
- 27:16In response to the billion-dollar blockbuster drug,
- 27:1944% of patients were pain-free within two hours.
- 27:23In response to less than a penny's worth
- 27:26of ground ginger you can buy at any store,
- 27:2944% were pain-free within two hours.
- 27:32There was one significant difference, though.
- 27:35Fewer side effects in the ginger group.
- 27:39Cinnamon can help prevent migraines in the first place,
- 27:44based on a randomized, double-blind,
- 27:46placebo-controlled trial
- 27:47found that quarter-teaspoon doses
- 27:49could significantly decrease migraine frequency,
- 27:52severity, and duration.
- 27:54For example, in the placebo group,
- 27:56pain dropped from about an 8 out of a 10,
- 27:58down to a 7,
- 27:59whereas in the group secretly slipped some cinnamon
- 28:02hidden in capsules,
- 28:04pain dropped from an 8 out of a 10, down to a 3.
- 28:09And, no, it was not funded by Big Bark.
- 28:13(audience laughing)
- 28:16Prescription drugs
- 28:19may kill more than 100,000 Americans every year,
- 28:22making medications a leading cause of death.
- 28:26So, that's why, you know, doctors are rightly resistant
- 28:29to changing their clinical practice
- 28:31based on a some single, small, new suggestive study, right?
- 28:36But when it comes to something as safe, simple,
- 28:38and side-effect-free as cinnamon,
- 28:42what's the downside of telling all our migraine patients
- 28:46to give it a try, right?
- 28:48They probably even have it
- 28:49sitting in their pantry right now.
- 28:52Even if this cinnamon study was, like, some total fluke,
- 28:54what's the worst that can happen?
- 28:57Tastier oatmeal?
- 28:59(audience laughing)
- 29:03This is just one of many examples
- 29:05that you'll find throughout my new book,
- 29:06simple foods that are safer, cheaper,
- 29:09sometimes even more effective than drugs.
- 29:13The reason your doctor never said anything
- 29:16about these natural remedies
- 29:17is probably because they never heard of them.
- 29:19Right, the clinical trials were published
- 29:21in the peer-reviewed medical literature,
- 29:23but there are more than a million papers
- 29:26published every year.
- 29:28Which of those million
- 29:31do you think most doctors hear about?
- 29:34The ones with corporate budgets.
- 29:36The ones that drug reps tell us about
- 29:38over their "free" lunch.
- 29:41Plants aren't profitable
- 29:44because plants aren't patentable.
- 29:48The latest migraine drugs
- 29:50can cost more than $100 per pill.
- 29:55And don't even work as well
- 29:57as the common migraine medication sumatriptan.
- 30:00Patients at risk pay more for less effective drugs
- 30:05because they're safer.
- 30:06See, triptan drugs have artery-constricting effects
- 30:10and may triple one's odds of a heart attack or stroke.
- 30:13Whereas ground ginger could work just as well,
- 30:17without the same risks,
- 30:18and be literally a thousand times cheaper.
- 30:24But that's the problem.
- 30:26There's just no money to be made.
- 30:30No company is going to thrill their stockholders
- 30:32selling something that costs less than a penny per day.
- 30:38There are fruits that fight pain,
- 30:40like figs for painful periods.
- 30:43There are vegetables that fight pain,
- 30:45like comforting cruciferous.
- 30:47Comparing the painkilling effects of kale
- 30:50versus ibuprofen after wisdom tooth surgery,
- 30:53a randomized, double-blind split-mouth clinical trial,
- 30:57and the equivalent of a quarter cup of cooked kale
- 31:00worked better than taking two ibuprofen.
- 31:04Even some weeds work.
- 31:07Anyone recognize this plant?
- 31:10Oh, look at this smart crowd!
- 31:14Purslane is one of the most common weeds in the world,
- 31:16found growing out of cracks in the sidewalk
- 31:19everywhere you look once you start noticing it.
- 31:22Pitted against an inflammatory autoimmune condition
- 31:25known as oral lichen planus,
- 31:27in which our immune system
- 31:28attacks the lining of our mouth,
- 31:30a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- 31:32found that 83 percent of those in the purslane group
- 31:35experienced partial or complete clinical improvement,
- 31:39compared to 83 percent in the placebo group
- 31:41either not responding at all or getting worse.
- 31:46In a comparison of the safety and efficacy
- 31:49of nine different treatments,
- 31:50including immunosuppressants and steroids,
- 31:53this simple common weed appears to be the most--
- 31:56the safest--both the safest
- 31:58and most effective treatment available.
- 32:03There are beans that can balm.
- 32:05A significant improvement
- 32:07in the joint-and-muscle pains of menopause for soybeans
- 32:12compared to--comparable to that of hormone therapy.
- 32:16How about cocoa for claudication?
- 32:19Cocoa is kind of a bean.
- 32:20Well, claudication is the crampy calf pain
- 32:24due to peripheral artery disease.
- 32:25In the six-minute walk distance test,
- 32:2934 meters is considered a large meaningful change.
- 32:33Those randomized to three tablespoons of cocoa a day
- 32:35got about 43 meters farther
- 32:39compared to a fake chocolate placebo powder.
- 32:42And it wasn't just due to improved blood flow.
- 32:45Muscle biopsies showed the cocoa actually improved
- 32:48mitochondrial function,
- 32:49the little power plants within our cells.
- 32:52Cardiologist commentators concluded
- 32:54that such studies are insufficient
- 32:56to advocate "widespread prescription of cocoa"
- 32:59to peripheral artery disease patients.
- 33:01I mean, though they concede
- 33:03the "negligible risk, low costs, potential benefit,"
- 33:06they demand "further proof."
- 33:08Now, this makes sense
- 33:10if we're talking about a new drug, right?
- 33:14But what's the downside of making your life
- 33:15just a little more chocolaty
- 33:18by adding some natural cocoa powder
- 33:20to your daily diet?
- 33:21They stress that the "'therapeutic pleasure'
- 33:24of cocoa consumption must not replace
- 33:27established standards such as exercise,
- 33:29smoking cessation,
- 33:30and vigorous optimization of cardiovascular risk."
- 33:34I agree, but, wait, who said anything about replacing?
- 33:39We can do all of the above, right?
- 33:42That's the nice thing about dietary approaches-
- 33:45they can be done in addition
- 33:47to however else we're being treated.
- 33:50There are even grains for pains.
- 33:53Less than a quarter teaspoon of wheat germ
- 33:55hidden in capsules taken every six hours
- 33:58after vaginal delivery
- 33:59significantly reduced postpartum pain
- 34:03and the need for painkillers, compared to placebo.
- 34:05That's another single-cent strategy.
- 34:09I go through dozens of different foods and beverages
- 34:12shown to help in randomized controlled trials
- 34:13with each specific condition,
- 34:15but certain foods came up over and over
- 34:18in chapter after chapter.
- 34:19In particular, there are seven-and only seven-
- 34:22that have been shown to help
- 34:23with three or more different diseases.
- 34:27I call them my Soothing Seven.
- 34:29I talk about the dosing for each,
- 34:31the good side effects, and the caveats.
- 34:33I already touched on cinnamon for one of the four conditions
- 34:36it can help with.
- 34:37Garlic powder is another single-cent solution.
- 34:41Endometriosis affects millions of women.
- 34:44What happened when women in pain
- 34:47were randomized to a daily eighth of a teaspoon
- 34:50of garlic powder hidden in pills
- 34:52compared to placebo?
- 34:54They experienced significant relief of back pain,
- 34:58pelvic pain, painful sex, and painful periods.
- 35:02The overall pain of the placebo group
- 35:04started out at about a 6 or 7 out of 10
- 35:07and didn't budge throughout the study.
- 35:10Whereas those secretly slipped just a pinch of ginger powder
- 35:15started out about the same, but the pain dropped
- 35:18month after month down to a two out of 10.
- 35:23Same thing with pelvic pain.
- 35:26Same thing with back pain.
- 35:29Same thing with painful periods.
- 35:31Same thing with painful sex.
- 35:32A penny-a-day's worth of a spice
- 35:36that you may already have in your kitchen.
- 35:41Garlic also protects against two other painful conditions-
- 35:44and against those who want to suck your blood literally!
- 35:49A study conducted by the Swedish military
- 35:51found a significant reduction in tick bites
- 35:54in soldiers randomized to garlic.
- 35:58I talked about ginger for migraines.
- 36:00Less than a quarter teaspoon of ground ginger a day
- 36:02can also beat out placebo for joint pain.
- 36:06Researchers conclude that ginger is to be recommended
- 36:09as a "safe drug" for these patients,
- 36:11but by "drug," they're just talking
- 36:13about a couple, you know, pinches
- 36:15of the ground ginger you can buy at any store.
- 36:17There was even a study on topical ginger-
- 36:21at least, when applied to the scrotum.
- 36:25Paper-thin slices of ginger
- 36:28applied over the inflamed testicles-
- 36:30and the researchers were on-the-ball...
- 36:33(audience laughing)
- 36:36...healing nearly three times faster than the control group.
- 36:39(audience laughing)
- 36:43Next up is turmeric,
- 36:44the golden spice taking the gold
- 36:46for the broadest pain-fighting effects,
- 36:49with randomized controlled trials
- 36:51showing significant benefit
- 36:52against nine different pain conditions.
- 36:56If I had to pick just one to highlight,
- 36:57a multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
- 36:59placebo-controlled trial of patients
- 37:01with ulcerative colitis
- 37:02that were not responding to a maximum dose
- 37:06of an anti-inflammatory drug.
- 37:08And, of course, we know what happens after that.
- 37:10They can go on for a colectomy.
- 37:13Okay, so what about adding an anti-inflammatory spice?
- 37:17A month later, the disease kept raging
- 37:20in 100% of the placebo group,
- 37:22zero percent remission,
- 37:24whereas in the group given the turmeric pigment curcumin,
- 37:28more than half were in remission.
- 37:33Berries.
- 37:35There are studies showing significant pain relief
- 37:37from strawberries, bilberries, barberries.
- 37:39Here's one on blueberries for what we used to call
- 37:43juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
- 37:46Two hundred kids randomized to receive a biologic drug
- 37:48with or without blueberry juice,
- 37:51equivalent to about a third cup of blueberries a day.
- 37:55Significantly more kids had a reduction in disease activity
- 37:59in the blueberry juice group,
- 38:00compared to the drug-only group
- 38:02or the placebo juice group.
- 38:06This resulted in significantly less joint pain, tenderness,
- 38:10swelling, stiffness, and fatigue,
- 38:13but not only fewer symptoms,
- 38:15fewer side effects from the drug.
- 38:19Compared to the placebo-berry-group-on-the-drug,
- 38:23those getting the real blueberries
- 38:25suffered significantly fewer adverse psychological effects,
- 38:29less nerve inflammation, weight gain, infections,
- 38:31blood vessel inflammation,
- 38:33less diarrhea, eye inflammation,
- 38:35bone marrow failure,
- 38:36less weakness, chest pain, and chronic cough-
- 38:38so, about 30 blueberries a day
- 38:42made the treatment significantly safer
- 38:44and more effective, right?
- 38:46This is a great example
- 38:47of how dietary approaches aren't either/or,
- 38:50but can support whatever else we're doing.
- 38:55Flaxseeds.
- 38:57A soothing seed against four pain conditions,
- 38:59including cyclic mastalgia, menstrual breast pain.
- 39:04A tablespoon of ground flaxseeds
- 39:05versus a ground wheat placebo.
- 39:08Women in both groups started out
- 39:10with about a week of breast pain every month,
- 39:13down to 6 days in the placebo group,
- 39:15but cut in half, down to just 3 days a month
- 39:18in the flaxseed group.
- 39:19In terms of pain severity:
- 39:2120% drop in the placebo group
- 39:23versus a 70% drop in the flaxseed group.
- 39:27There's been four such studies to date
- 39:30such that the official guidelines
- 39:32of the Society of OB/GYNs in Canada,
- 39:34dating back 20 years,
- 39:37recommends flaxseed as a first-line therapy
- 39:41for menstrual breast pain.
- 39:44Flaxseed oil can even be used topically.
- 39:47Five drops on the front of the wrist twice a day
- 39:51versus a placebo oil for carpal tunnel syndrome,
- 39:55not only yielded significant improvements
- 39:57in pain and function,
- 39:58but an improvement in nerve conduction velocity,
- 40:02suggesting it's more than just kind of symptomatic relief.
- 40:06Also works rubbed on arthritic knees,
- 40:09significant improvement in pain, function,
- 40:12quality of life...
- 40:14Flax--this has been--rubbing flaxseed oil on arthritic knees
- 40:18has been recommended in traditional medical texts
- 40:20going back to the Middle Ages,
- 40:22but it took 'em a thousand years
- 40:24before it was finally put to the test.
- 40:28I have a bunch of recipes throughout the book
- 40:31for both topical and oral remedies
- 40:33where I tie together
- 40:34kind of multiple natural treatments together,
- 40:37but no guarantees they aren't gonna taste
- 40:40or smell disgusting.
- 40:41Just gonna have a little note there.
- 40:44And finally, while I talk about the benefits
- 40:47of chamomile tea, and nettle tea,
- 40:48and rose and lavender teas-
- 40:50soy milk for specific conditions,
- 40:52the only beverage I could find
- 40:54that could, um, alleviate three, um,
- 40:57different pain conditions was green tea.
- 41:00Uterine fibroids, for example.
- 41:03Over a period of four months, fibroid volume increased
- 41:07by 24 percent in the placebo group.
- 41:09And that's what fibroids do; they continue to grow.
- 41:13However, those randomized to the green tea
- 41:16showed a 32% shrinkage of their fibroids.
- 41:22This then translated into a significant decrease
- 41:25in symptom severity
- 41:27and improvements in both quality of life and anemia,
- 41:30an increase in blood counts
- 41:32due to reduction in heavy flow.
- 41:35The dose used in the extract
- 41:36to disguise the tea in capsules
- 41:39would be equivalent to about five cups of green tea a day,
- 41:41or a few teaspoons of matcha.
- 41:44Plants are powerful.
- 41:49Where do you think morphine came from, right?
- 41:52The opium poppy.
- 41:54Aspirin grows on trees, right?
- 41:57Originally derived from willow tree bark.
- 41:59We open up nature's medicine cabinet
- 42:01every time we pull out the crisper in our fridge.
- 42:05Okay, what if our entire diet
- 42:08was centered around whole healthy plant foods?
- 42:11Well, for chronic migraines,
- 42:14a whole food plant-based diet may offer
- 42:15a safe, effective, and permanent treatment
- 42:18for reversing chronic migraines,
- 42:20particularly in those with refractory disease.
- 42:23Prescribing optimal nutrition is also suggested
- 42:26as a first-line intervention for osteoarthritis:
- 42:30a diet centered around whole plant foods,
- 42:32but it wasn't put to the test until 2015,
- 42:36resulting in a significant reduction of pain
- 42:39starting within two weeks.
- 42:43What happened after the study ended though?
- 42:46In the "Plants for Joints" trials,
- 42:50hip and knee osteoarthritis patients
- 42:53randomized to advice to eat a whole food plant-based diet
- 42:56experienced significant improvements in pain,
- 42:59stiffness, function, and overall symptoms
- 43:02and saw similar benefits in rheumatoid arthritis,
- 43:07a significant reduction in disease activity,
- 43:10including nearly five times greater odds
- 43:13of achieving remission.
- 43:16Now, after 16 weeks, both studies were over.
- 43:20But 8 months later the researchers followed up,
- 43:23and at the end of the year,
- 43:25improvements in disease activity
- 43:26in both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients
- 43:29were largely maintained
- 43:32because many stuck with the diet on their own,
- 43:35such that half of the rheumatoid patients
- 43:39and two-thirds of the osteoarthritis patients
- 43:41were able to decrease or stop
- 43:43their pain medications altogether.
- 43:46Plants for joints.
- 43:50You know, arthritis patients tend to have higher risk
- 43:53of getting cardiovascular disease
- 43:56and dying from cardiovascular disease.
- 44:00And so, as a bonus,
- 44:02the extraordinary 60% drop in LDL cholesterol you can get
- 44:08switching arthritis patients to a plant-based diet,
- 44:10in U.S. units,
- 44:11that's an 80-point drop
- 44:14over control from dietary change alone.
- 44:18An 80-point drop in LDL would be expected
- 44:20to cut the risk of cardiovascular disease
- 44:22over a dozen years in half.
- 44:26So, for arthritis patients, plant-based diets
- 44:29can be a lifesaver in more ways than one.
- 44:34And for those with heart disease,
- 44:37a plant-based diet and lifestyle program
- 44:39can reduce the frequency of chest pain angina attacks
- 44:41by 90%.
- 44:44In contrast to the control group patients,
- 44:46who were instead told to follow the diet
- 44:48and lifestyle advice
- 44:49from their personal physicians,
- 44:51suffering a 165 percent increase
- 44:54in angina attacks.
- 44:55The marked reduction, in frequency,
- 44:59severity, and duration of angina,
- 45:03was comparable to that of open-heart surgery,
- 45:06but without a bone saw bisecting our breast bone.
- 45:14Dr. Ornish later reflected
- 45:17that he had thought that his studies
- 45:18would have a meaningful effect
- 45:20on the practice of mainstream cardiology,
- 45:22but he underestimated how much influence
- 45:25the business of medicine would have
- 45:27on the practice of medicine,
- 45:29realizing that reimbursement may sometimes
- 45:32be a much more powerful determinant
- 45:33of medical practice than research.
- 45:36Peripheral artery disease too, impaired walking capacity
- 45:40from inadequate blood flow,
- 45:42boosted 5,000% on a plant-based diet
- 45:46and exercise program over exercise alone...
- 45:51including a patient who couldn't walk
- 45:53more than a hundred yards without extreme pain
- 45:56going on to run marathons.
- 46:01What about neuropathic pain?
- 46:0321 diabetics suffering from painful neuropathy
- 46:07for up to ten years were placed on a whole food,
- 46:10plant-based diet, and after years of suffering,
- 46:1317 out of the 21 patients reported they experienced
- 46:17complete relief from their pain within days.
- 46:23Now, the study was a live-in program that provided meals.
- 46:26I mean, what happened after they were sent back home
- 46:28into the real world?
- 46:30Those 17 were followed for years,
- 46:32and in all cases but one,
- 46:34the relief from their painful neuropathy continued,
- 46:36or improved even further.
- 46:39How were the researchers able to achieve such a high degree
- 46:43of dietary compliance even in an uncontrolled setting?
- 46:46"Pain and ill health," the researchers wrote,
- 46:49"are strong motivating factors."
- 46:51In other words, because the diet worked.
- 46:55Think about it.
- 46:57Patients hobble in with one of the most painful,
- 47:01frustrating, and difficult conditions
- 47:04to treat in all of medicine,
- 47:06and three quarters seemed cured in a matter of days
- 47:09using a natural, nontoxic treatment,
- 47:11namely, a diet centered around whole healthy foods,
- 47:14should have been front-page news.
- 47:18As one commentator wrote,
- 47:19"The neglect of this important work
- 47:21by the broader medical community
- 47:23is little short of unconscionable.”
- 47:27Of course, the best way to get rid of diabetic neuropathy
- 47:30may be to get rid of the diabetes.
- 47:33There's a new diagnostic code in town.
- 47:36Type 2 diabetes in remission.
- 47:39And an expert consensus statement
- 47:40put out by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine,
- 47:42co-sponsored by the Endocrine Society,
- 47:45endorsed by the American Association
- 47:46of Clinical Endocrinology,
- 47:48concluded that diet as a primary intervention
- 47:51for Type 2 diabetes can achieve remission in many,
- 47:55and that diet is most effective in achieving remission
- 47:58when emphasizing whole plant foods,
- 48:00with minimal consumption of meat and other animal products.
- 48:04(cheering)
- 48:07(applause)
- 48:12Trigeminal neuralgia. Some of the worst of the worst.
- 48:17For an average of eight years,
- 48:19most had severe daily attacks of 9 out of 10,
- 48:23or 10 out of 10 pain despite medications...
- 48:27and nearly a third had already gone through
- 48:29dozens of failed surgeries.
- 48:32They even included a set of patients
- 48:33with atypical trigeminal neuralgia,
- 48:35with "continuous never ending discomfort,"
- 48:38and put them all on a low saturated fat diet.
- 48:43Not vegan. They could eat as much, like, skim milk
- 48:45and Jell-O as they wanted.
- 48:47But within one month
- 48:49of cutting down on saturated fat,
- 48:5296% of those with typical trigeminal neuralgia
- 48:56had their pain levels drop to lower than 2 out of 10.
- 49:01And this was after most of them had already reduced
- 49:03or stopped their medications altogether.
- 49:07They went from an average pain of more than 9 out of 10,
- 49:11to an average pain of less than 1
- 49:14within an average of 16 days
- 49:18after suffering for an average of 8 years.
- 49:24Even the continuous pain patients
- 49:26went from about 9 out of 10 pain down to 2 in a matter of weeks.
- 49:32The post-surgical patients,
- 49:34after a total of dozens of failed surgeries,
- 49:37still suffering severe pain?
- 49:39Same thing.
- 49:40More than 9 out of 10, excruciating pain,
- 49:43down to less than 1 out of 10, which is like, what,
- 49:46a little paper cut or something?
- 49:50Now, the post-surgical group
- 49:52took 20 days to get better instead of 16 days,
- 49:55but they had been suffering for 11 years straight.
- 49:58Years of extreme suffering, then 20 days later, gone.
- 50:04They apparently had the power all along,
- 50:09but were just never told about a plant-based diet.
- 50:15Every day of the last decade, they were just 20 days away,
- 50:19at any time, from being free.
- 50:26By this time, the study was sent for publication,
- 50:28patients had been on the low saturated fat diet
- 50:30for an average of 20 months,
- 50:31and the only reported side effect
- 50:33was losing up to 75 pounds.
- 50:36(audience laughing)
- 50:38The researchers recognize
- 50:40that placebo effects could not be excluded,
- 50:42"although," look, "dramatic and sustained improvements
- 50:45even in the post-surgical group
- 50:47with severe and intractable pain
- 50:50does make it unlikely."
- 50:52They acknowledge that the results
- 50:53seem too good to be true
- 50:55and call for further trials to be performed.
- 50:59Yet, no such studies have been forthcoming.
- 51:04How is that possible?
- 51:06They reported some of the most striking findings
- 51:08in the entire field of pain medicine,
- 51:11originally presented in the single most widely read
- 51:14and highly cited neurology journal in the world,
- 51:17yet their study was lost down the memory hole.
- 51:21The only reference to it I could find
- 51:23in the medical literature was a single mention
- 51:25in a dental journal back in 2014.
- 51:29Plants are powerful,
- 51:30but there's just no money to be made.
- 51:35What about inflammatory bowel disease?
- 51:40Mitsuro Chiba, IBD Chief at a hospital in Japan,
- 51:46noting a correlation between the increase in animal foods
- 51:50and the 400-fold explosion
- 51:53in Crohn's disease in his country,
- 51:55decided to put plant-based diets to the test
- 51:58and found they appeared to beat out everything else out there.
- 52:04Not only did they find that plant-based diets
- 52:07were effective for all degrees of severity,
- 52:10in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis,
- 52:12they achieved far better outcomes
- 52:16in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease,
- 52:19compared to current standard therapy
- 52:21in both the induction phase
- 52:22and quiescent phases of both diseases.
- 52:25Lower relapse rates for ulcerative colitis,
- 52:29compared to conventional treatment.
- 52:31Higher induction of remission
- 52:33with biologics in Crohn's disease,
- 52:36compared to conventional treatment.
- 52:38And higher relapse free rates 10 years later,
- 52:42compared to conventional treatment.
- 52:46Plant-based diets, they conclude,
- 52:47are unreservedly recommended for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
- 52:52Of course, plant-based diets would be advisable
- 52:55even if they didn't help at all because cardiovascular disease
- 52:58is the leading cause of death, of IBD patients,
- 53:01in fact disproportionately so.
- 53:04And the heart-healthiest diet,
- 53:06the one capable of even reversing
- 53:08the progression of cardiovascular disease,
- 53:11is a plant-based diet.
- 53:13So, the bar isn't just low
- 53:15for recommending IBD patients follow a plant-based diet.
- 53:18I mean, it'd have to be actively harmful
- 53:20to justify not endorsing it.
- 53:22Instead, it's not just helpful.
- 53:25There's evidence to suggest eating plant-based
- 53:27may be the single most effective
- 53:29IBD treatment ever published in all of medicine.
- 53:34A real-world study of advanced therapies,
- 53:37for severe ulcerative colitis
- 53:39using some of the latest biologic drugs
- 53:42described their efficacy rate of 30% as "satisfactory."
- 53:48Dr. Chiba published a response in the journal,
- 53:52noting his plant-based protocol was far more effective,
- 53:55not to mention safer and cheaper.
- 53:57In reply, the lead author of the study,
- 54:00for which the conflicts of interest with Big Pharma
- 54:03took up nearly an entire page...
- 54:06countered that patients should be able to decide for themselves
- 54:10on the content of their meals based on their own preferences.
- 54:15Of course, patients should be able to decide
- 54:18on what to put in their stomachs and lungs, for that matter.
- 54:22The question is what we, as doctors,
- 54:24should be recommending.
- 54:27If these researchers were truly interested in patient autonomy,
- 54:33they would disclose all the available options
- 54:35and let patients decide for themselves.
- 54:39One of the wonderful things about lifestyle improvements
- 54:42is that they aren't either/or.
- 54:43We can eat more healthfully
- 54:45in addition to whatever other interventions we may choose.
- 54:48But patients are robbed of this choice
- 54:50when they're not fully informed of the power of their fork.
- 54:54Dr. Chiba laments that it may take a few decades
- 54:57to accept plant-based diets for IBD in the guidelines.
- 55:00I mean, it's a pity that the majority of patients
- 55:03are not told about eating plant-based
- 55:05and are suffering from the disease.
- 55:08Now, not all responses in the medical literature
- 55:11to Dr. Chiba's groundbreaking work
- 55:13were as defensive.
- 55:14The authors of a landmark special report
- 55:17on lifestyle medicine published in the journal
- 55:19of the largest nonprofit
- 55:20healthcare organization in the U.S. wrote,
- 55:23"Dr. Chiba and colleagues have made a major contribution
- 55:26to moving healthcare forward with their extensive work
- 55:29in the field of IBD.
- 55:30We are totally in concurrence
- 55:32with their conclusion that dietary guidelines,
- 55:34focusing on a whole food, plant-based diet
- 55:37as treatment for chronic diseases
- 55:39is not only needed, but must be implemented."
- 55:45Let me close with an amazing fact...
- 55:51about the human body.
- 55:54Nearly every year, we are reborn.
- 55:59We destroy, and create anew,
- 56:02our entire body weight in cells about every year and a half.
- 56:08Every second of every day,
- 56:11about four million of our cells die
- 56:14and about four million new cells are born.
- 56:17Every second!
- 56:19We replace about 300 billion cells every day.
- 56:23Now some cells, like heart cells,
- 56:26can last for years, and a few,
- 56:27like some of the cells in our brain,
- 56:29in the lenses of our eyes, can last a lifetime.
- 56:32But the other 99.5% of the cells in our body
- 56:36are continuously replaced.
- 56:40What are they replaced with?
- 56:45Every new cell in our body is ultimately made up
- 56:48of only three things.
- 56:50Air, water, and food.
- 56:53Those are essentially the only inputs.
- 56:55The air we breathe, the water we drink,
- 56:57and the food we eat.
- 56:59We are what we eat, literally, physically.
- 57:03No wonder our dietary choices
- 57:05can have such a profound influence
- 57:08on the functioning of our bodies.
- 57:10In a sense, our body has to re-form itself
- 57:13about every 18 months with the building materials
- 57:15that we deliver to it through our stomachs.
- 57:19Our mouths are like the access road
- 57:22to the continual construction site that is our body.
- 57:28Trucks roll in three times a day.
- 57:31What do we want them to deliver?
- 57:34Do we want to buy some cheap,
- 57:36shoddy building materials at the drive-through?
- 57:39(chuckles)
- 57:41Or do we want to build our foundation solid?
- 57:45Each of us lives inside
- 57:48the greatest known architectural structure in the universe.
- 57:54Let us not ruin such grand blueprints by consuming crap.
- 58:01The power to live a long healthy pain-free life
- 58:04may lie in our pantry.
- 58:07And the nice thing about side-effect-free strategies
- 58:09is, look, you can just give 'em a try
- 58:10and see if they help, right?
- 58:12You have nothing to lose but your pains.
- 58:16Okay. So, I was only able to cover about 60 studies.
- 58:20If we can actually put back my slides up.
- 58:24How Not to Hurt ended up
- 58:26with over 6,000 citations.
- 58:31So, I was only able to cover about 1% of the book today.
- 58:35For the other 99%, please feel free
- 58:37to check it out from your local public library.
- 58:40It does go on sale in December, but you can pre-order it now.
- 58:43And if you do choose to buy it,
- 58:45know that all proceeds I receive,
- 58:46every penny from the sales of my books,
- 58:48goes directly to charity.
- 58:50I just want you and your loved ones
- 58:52to live long healthy lives, free of suffering.
- 58:56Thank you.
- 58:57(applause, cheering)
- 59:15Thank you.
- 59:17Before I go, if you would like me
- 59:19to come speak in your city, at your hospital,
- 59:22to your community group, please reach out.
- 59:24I'm booking my 2027 book tour now
- 59:27and would love to reach your neighbors, your colleagues.
- 59:29Go to see.nf/speaking.
- 59:31That's see.nf/speaking.
- 59:34Thank you so much, everybody!
- 59:37(cheering)
- 59:40Do you time for questions?
- 59:42Oh! Yeah! I love questions! Oh, let's do it.
- 59:45We do have time for a couple of questions.
- 59:47Uh, well, thank you so much, Dr. Greger,
- 59:49for sharing some of your research.
- 59:53So, say a patient is kind of starting at ground zero.
- 59:57They're in a lot of pain.
- 59:59They're following the standard American diet.
- 1:00:02Where do they need to start?
- 1:00:04-Where are they going to start? -Yeah.
- 1:00:06Well, you know, I don't know if you know this,
- 1:00:08there's this amazing organization
- 1:00:10called Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.
- 1:00:13They have all these resources.
- 1:00:14There's the Clinicians Guide to Nutrition.
- 1:00:16Oh, my God. Check it out, pcrm.org.
- 1:00:21And say someone's already following
- 1:00:23the whole food, low-fat plant-based diet.
- 1:00:25Is there-- of the Soothing Seven,
- 1:00:27say specifically for migraines,
- 1:00:30or if they're having a specific type of pain,
- 1:00:34is there any that's giving the most benefit?
- 1:00:36-Any of the Soothing Seven-- -Oh!
- 1:00:37No, absolutely. So, I mean, so,
- 1:00:39I mean, the Soothing Seven are really just
- 1:00:41for things that we actually don't have any diagnosis for
- 1:00:44or one of the conditions is not covered by the book.
- 1:00:46But I have a whole chapter on migraines.
- 1:00:48So, you go straight to the migraine chapter
- 1:00:50and you just do all the things that help with migraines,
- 1:00:52many of which only help with migraines
- 1:00:54or one or two conditions,
- 1:00:55so they never made the Soothing Seven,
- 1:00:56but I go through dozens of different foods
- 1:00:58that work for different conditions.
- 1:00:59And, look, maybe they'd help for something else.
- 1:01:02But they just haven't been tested yet.
- 1:01:04I mean, we're kind of limited
- 1:01:06to the available data that we have.
- 1:01:09Perfect.
- 1:01:10And how quickly--I think I heard you say it.
- 1:01:13Is it true within even a couple of days
- 1:01:16that people will notice measurable decreases in pain?
- 1:01:20Well, it depends on the condition
- 1:01:22we're talking about.
- 1:01:24But, yeah, I mean, as I mentioned,
- 1:01:25there's just these remarkable, right?
- 1:01:27So, osteoarthritis, the leading cause
- 1:01:28of physical disability among older adults, right?
- 1:01:31Within two weeks, significant reduction in pain.
- 1:01:33Amazing. And then, right, it just gets better
- 1:01:36the longer people stay with this.
- 1:01:38And so, actually, the studies,
- 1:01:39most of these are relatively short-term studies,
- 1:01:42lasting only months.
- 1:01:44And remember, like, that amazing--
- 1:01:48The endometriosis study, right?
- 1:01:51Where with a little pinch of garlic powder,
- 1:01:53and it's like every single month,
- 1:01:54better, better, better, better.
- 1:01:56And then, at the end of four months,
- 1:01:58it was like a straight line decrease.
- 1:01:59What happened to month five? Do you think it went back?
- 1:02:01I mean, presumably, right,
- 1:02:04that's when they stop the study, right?
- 1:02:08And so, we would presume
- 1:02:10that whatever mechanism is going on.
- 1:02:12And you know, for many of these foods,
- 1:02:13we just don't know, like,
- 1:02:14why does kale beat out ibuprofen?
- 1:02:16Like, what is in cruciferous
- 1:02:18that's so pain-killing, or anti-inflammatory?
- 1:02:20I mean, we presume it's an anti-inflammatory effect.
- 1:02:23But for many of these, we actually don't know.
- 1:02:25And frankly, it's like, "Who knows, who cares," right?
- 1:02:29I mean, if you're in pain, like, you know,
- 1:02:30in fact, the publisher came to me and says,
- 1:02:32"Okay, you're doing a book on pain. All right.
- 1:02:34I want a chapter on, like,
- 1:02:36describe the nervous system, the central nervous system,
- 1:02:39you know, how pain signals work, and blah, blah, blah."
- 1:02:41I'm like, "Oh, come on. No. Screw that.
- 1:02:44I'm going straight to the practicals.
- 1:02:46If you're in pain, you're not gonna be like,
- 1:02:48'Oh, this is nociceptive pain.'
- 1:02:50No! Give me, you know."
- 1:02:52And so, it's just practical, practical, practical.
- 1:02:54This is what--you have this, do this, try this.
- 1:02:57And it's like, what level of evidence,
- 1:02:59I mean, many of these, there's really just one trial.
- 1:03:01You know? I mean, yes, it may be a randomized,
- 1:03:03double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,
- 1:03:04kind of the gold standard of evidence,
- 1:03:06but it's just one little trial.
- 1:03:07Maybe it only had, you know, a couple dozen people in it.
- 1:03:09But again, like, how much evidence do you need
- 1:03:11to try something with literally no downsides,
- 1:03:13and in many cases, it's healthy anyway.
- 1:03:15So, it's like, "Look, blueberries!"
- 1:03:17Feeding blueberries to kids, healthy anyway.
- 1:03:20So, the fact that it also just happens to, you know,
- 1:03:23significantly improve the effect of this drug,
- 1:03:26decrease the side effects is just, like,
- 1:03:29"Maybe that study was a total fluke!"
- 1:03:32Just crazy out of nowhere and, you know,
- 1:03:34one-in-a-million kind of thing.
- 1:03:36And the blueberries didn't help at all.
- 1:03:37Guess what? Blueberries are still gonna be good for kids.
- 1:03:40Right? And so, it's like, what do you need?
- 1:03:43(audience laughing)
- 1:03:45Absolutely.
- 1:03:46And in your research,
- 1:03:47were there any seemingly healthy plant-based foods,
- 1:03:51or foods that we should be aware of
- 1:03:52that were triggering any type of--
- 1:03:55Oh, interesting. Yeah.
- 1:03:56So, I mean, this talk, and this is kind of a, you know,
- 1:04:01a strategy that many of us use to talk to our patients.
- 1:04:04You know, they come to us and they think
- 1:04:05we're gonna be, like, wagging our finger,
- 1:04:07"Don't eat this. Don't eat this favorite food.
- 1:04:08No more pepperoni pizza, blah, blah, blah."
- 1:04:10And so, you know, one of the strategies we use
- 1:04:13is to be like, "No, no, no.
- 1:04:14Just, let's add some--
- 1:04:17you know, how about eating an apple
- 1:04:18before every lunch and dinner?
- 1:04:19And they're like, "That's a little weird.
- 1:04:21Oh, I'm eating more food? Oh, okay."
- 1:04:23Or, you know, "How about drinking
- 1:04:25a few glasses of water, blah, blah, blah."
- 1:04:26And you start like that as kind of a soft entry.
- 1:04:30And so, from this presentation, you'll notice,
- 1:04:33I'm just talking about all the good foods,
- 1:04:35but there are lots of proalgesic--
- 1:04:38you know, there's analgesic, pain-killing.
- 1:04:40There's proalgesic foods.
- 1:04:41There are foods that actually increase pain.
- 1:04:43So, I've talked a little bit--
- 1:04:44Like, the reason a saturated fat lowering diet helps
- 1:04:46is because saturated fat
- 1:04:48has been causing all this suffering.
- 1:04:51And so, there certainly are a lot of things that you take,
- 1:04:57like sodium plays a role
- 1:04:59in many auto-immune inflammatory processes.
- 1:05:02You can get remarkable benefits for psoriasis
- 1:05:04and psoriatic joint pain by decreasing sodium
- 1:05:08and all sorts of, you know.
- 1:05:11But in terms of, well, wait a second,
- 1:05:12we're gonna need, like, good foods, that maybe...
- 1:05:16Well, so, no.
- 1:05:17And Hana actually talked about this
- 1:05:19a little bit on the panel
- 1:05:21that some people have these idiosyncratic food intolerances.
- 1:05:24So, they aren't allergies.
- 1:05:26Like, you don't have IgE reaction to this.
- 1:05:29They aren't typical allergies.
- 1:05:31But you can do these blinded food challenge trials.
- 1:05:37So, you take people and so, for example,
- 1:05:39you cut out dairy, which is kind of the typical example,
- 1:05:41and all of a sudden, they feel amazing, you're like,
- 1:05:43"Oh, maybe that's the placebo effect."
- 1:05:45You changed your diet, you know...
- 1:05:47And you could have a control group, but still, who knows?
- 1:05:49So, what you do is you give them a blinded food challenge.
- 1:05:50You give them, you know, skim milk powder in capsules,
- 1:05:53versus cornstarch or something.
- 1:05:55And all of a sudden, "Oh, my God,
- 1:05:57the flaring, all of the symptoms have come back."
- 1:05:58And you're like, "Okay, now we know it's dairy."
- 1:06:00And this is the case.
- 1:06:02So, for example, like 1 in 20 people
- 1:06:04with joint pain feel better
- 1:06:06cutting out nightshade vegetables, right?
- 1:06:08Tomatoes and eggplant, bell peppers and stuff,
- 1:06:12which is fantastic news.
- 1:06:14Oh, my God. If you have joint pain,
- 1:06:17you would wish that you'd live in a planet
- 1:06:18where all you have to do is a simple dietary change
- 1:06:20and all of a sudden, you feel better.
- 1:06:21That's amazing, right?
- 1:06:22So, hey, worth a try.
- 1:06:24I mean, that kind of thing, literally.
- 1:06:25So, I go through-- So, some of the--
- 1:06:27So, most of the common triggers are what you expect.
- 1:06:29Like, meat and dairy and eggs,
- 1:06:31and whether it's the pro-inflammatory
- 1:06:33like the arachidonic acid
- 1:06:35or who knows what--
- 1:06:37But, you know, corn, in some cases,
- 1:06:41or particularly some of these New World foods
- 1:06:45that we didn't necessarily evolve
- 1:06:47eating a lot of in kind of Sub-Saharan Africa.
- 1:06:52And so, it's worth doing--
- 1:06:54So, I have this whole thing about elimination diets, right?
- 1:06:57So, if you go on, you know, there's various--
- 1:07:01I talk about various methods.
- 1:07:02But so a few, like, just stopping everything
- 1:07:04but, like, water, sweet potatoes,
- 1:07:06and tapioca or something.
- 1:07:08And all your pain, which is basically things that,
- 1:07:10like, no one is really sensitive to.
- 1:07:12And all of a sudden, all your pain goes away.
- 1:07:14You're like, "Holy shit.
- 1:07:15Something about the diet is doing it.
- 1:07:17We don't know what.
- 1:07:18Now, if you do that, and your pain stays the same,
- 1:07:21well, obviously, diet is not playing
- 1:07:23a significant role, right?
- 1:07:24But if all of a sudden, two weeks later, like,
- 1:07:26you feel amazing like you never have,
- 1:07:29then you're like, "Oh, my God, okay."
- 1:07:31So, then, what do you do?
- 1:07:32You start adding back food groups.
- 1:07:34And so, you start with, like, the most common culprit.
- 1:07:38It's because you want to determine what to eat first
- 1:07:39and not wait, like, three years in,
- 1:07:41"Oh, now I know that I could," you know.
- 1:07:43And so, you start with the common culprits.
- 1:07:45Okay, so then, you know, you add back this,
- 1:07:47and you're looking for the symptoms
- 1:07:48to come raging back.
- 1:07:50And so, and we hope to find that one thing.
- 1:07:53And sometimes, it can be some crazy, you know,
- 1:07:56"Oh, this person has some weird corn reaction,"
- 1:07:59which is not, I mean,
- 1:08:01corn is in so many foods that, I mean,
- 1:08:02it can be a difficult--
- 1:08:03But what a miracle for these people.
- 1:08:06And so, there's just a protocol where every few days,
- 1:08:08you've got to make your food group,
- 1:08:09you do it in this order,
- 1:08:10and see if you can actually determine
- 1:08:12what is causing it.
- 1:08:13And sometimes, it really is.
- 1:08:14I'm like, "What?
- 1:08:15You can't eat bananas? Okay. Don't eat bananas."
- 1:08:18Like, amazing. That's awesome. Yeah.
- 1:08:21Awesome. Well, another round of applause for Dr. Greger.
- 1:08:23-Thank you so, so much. -Thank you!
- 1:08:25(applause)
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of How Not to Hurt—Live Presentation by NutritionFacts.org, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 9,312 words across 1,425 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.