How Academia Abandoned Evidence for Ideology | Melanie Philips — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00These people who were responsible for
- 0:02producing apparently ostensibly
- 0:05objective research were themselves
- 0:08caught up in these family dramas. They
- 0:10were themselves becoming divorced. They
- 0:12were themselves having children who were
- 0:14becoming divorced.
- 0:16And they couldn't bear the disconnect
- 0:20between the objective reality and their
- 0:22own family situation. So they made the
- 0:26objective reality fit their subjective
- 0:29feelings. They twisted it. And I watched
- 0:32this happen.
- 0:34And I watched academics who were
- 0:36committed to the truth get denied grant
- 0:40funding because they said things which
- 0:41were unsayable about family breakdown.
- 0:44And I found that there was an almost
- 0:47impossible task in
- 0:50elaborating upon these objective facts,
- 0:53this objective evidence, without
- 0:55immediately being accused of being
- 0:57horrible personally to people. I was set
- 1:00upon by people who said,
- 1:02"How dare you call into question what I
- 1:05have done because I've done the best for
- 1:07my family. I've tried my best with my
- 1:09children." And I would say, "I didn't
- 1:10even know you were divorced."
- 1:12I'm not making any aspersions about
- 1:14individuals. Individuals cope the best
- 1:17they can with a variety of difficult
- 1:19circumstances. Many people who are
- 1:22divorced or who have are bringing up
- 1:24children but on their own do an
- 1:26absolutely magnificent job. They go to
- 1:28enormous and heroic uh ends efforts to
- 1:33protect their children. But
- 1:34nevertheless, it seems to me that these
- 1:37are situations of disadvantage. And
- 1:41isn't it better to try to avoid
- 1:44disadvantaging children uh wherever
- 1:47possible? In other words,
- 1:49we can't possibly entertain policy
- 1:52making which deliberately exposes
- 1:56children to disadvantage on the basis
- 1:58that it makes their parents happy
- 2:01because we should surely put our
- 2:02children first. And when one's dealing
- 2:04with public policy, one has to deal with
- 2:07the reality as it affects the vast
- 2:11majority of people. Uh that doesn't mean
- 2:13that you're not sympathetic to
- 2:14individuals going through these hard
- 2:16things.
- 2:17Well, those arguments went nowhere at
- 2:19all. The subjective ruled. Uh my
- 2:23personal feelings trumped the objective
- 2:25evidence. And this was part and parcel
- 2:29of something that Bioney realized after
- 2:32many years that what was happening was
- 2:35not
- 2:37confined to this very emotional issue of
- 2:40the family, which clearly had emotional
- 2:43ramifications because people were
- 2:45personally bound up with this issue.
- 2:47What was happening was that the very
- 2:51idea of objective evidence was being
- 2:55cast aside because it was too
- 2:57inconvenient when it got in the way what
- 3:00people wanted, how they wanted to live
- 3:02their own lives.
- 3:04And
- 3:05as the years went on, it seemed to me
- 3:08that not only was evidence being cast
- 3:10aside, not only was apparently objective
- 3:14evidence by university researchers
- 3:17becoming subjective and warped and wrong
- 3:20and false, but the very idea of evidence
- 3:25was being overturned. The very idea of
- 3:28rationality and reason were being
- 3:31dismissed.
- 3:33And
- 3:35this was all part and parcel of what
- 3:38only appeared to me to be the case after
- 3:40many years, that on issue after issue
- 3:43after issue,
- 3:45family lifestyle choice, um
- 3:48multiculturalism,
- 3:50um deep green environmentalism,
- 3:53um moral relativism, moral and cultural
- 3:56relativism, and all those isms, they
- 3:59were all ideologies.
- 4:01And the point about an ideology is that
- 4:03the idea is sacrosanct. Nothing can get
- 4:07in the way of the idea. That's the first
- 4:09thing.
- 4:10And the second thing is that all the
- 4:12these ideologies were utopian. They were
- 4:15all predicated on a belief basically in
- 4:17the perfection of the world. So
- 4:19multiculturalism would eradicate
- 4:21prejudice from the human heart
- 4:23completely. Um it would stop war. It
- 4:26would stop conflict. Lifestyle choice
- 4:29would eradicate bigotry and the bigotry
- 4:33of a differences in people's lifestyles.
- 4:35So no longer would people look down on
- 4:37people who were divorced or
- 4:39or single parents and and all that kind
- 4:42of thing. They were all utopian. Deep
- 4:44green environmentalism was about saving
- 4:46the planet from frying and just being
- 4:48destroyed completely. So anyone who
- 4:51disagreed with these ideologies, anyone
- 4:53who said, "Well, actually the evidence
- 4:55shows this is wrong, factually wrong,"
- 4:59that couldn't happen
- 5:01because the ideology couldn't be
- 5:03gainsaid. And because these ideologies
- 5:06were all to do with the perfection of
- 5:07the world, anyone who spoke against them
- 5:10was not simply wrong, they were evil.
- 5:14And it couldn't be said because it was
- 5:16such an evil thing. And so you found
- 5:19that evidence became politicized. It
- 5:23became called right wing, ultra right
- 5:25wing, and all the rest of those
- 5:26epithets. And it became unsayable. And
- 5:30the people who dared to say it found
- 5:32themselves bullied and ostracized and
- 5:35persecuted and removed from their social
- 5:40uh all that they they they they lost
- 5:41their friends. They lost their
- 5:43professional advancement. They were
- 5:45threatened with their jobs. Some of them
- 5:46lost their jobs. And so you have the
- 5:48situation we have today. And the reason
- 5:50I wrote that book, um The Garden Angel,
- 5:53was because
- 5:55what had happened to me in my
- 5:56professional life, uh when I started out
- 5:59I worked for nearly 20 years for
- 6:00Guardian Newspapers, the very heart of
- 6:02this liberal universalist ideological
- 6:05perspective. And what happened to me
- 6:07over that period was as I
- 6:11I I fell foul of that world
- 6:15uh very badly. But what happened to me
- 6:17seemed to me to to to illustrate what
- 6:20had happened to the West, what happened
- 6:22to Britain and to the West. And so
- 6:24through the the story of what happened
- 6:27to me issue by issue, I could actually
- 6:30tell a bigger story of what happened to
- 6:31us in the West.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of How Academia Abandoned Evidence for Ideology | Melanie Philips by John Anderson Media, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 910 words across 156 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.