YouTube2Text

Has Society Ever NOT Been In Decline — Transcript

by How Business Worked · 4,152 words · 246 segments · language en · Watch on YouTube

Full transcript

  1. 0:00across the world today. It's obviously a pretty  common sentiment. Our society is in decline. It
  2. 0:06might be a touch pessimistic, but it's also easy  to see where people are coming from. Inequality
  3. 0:10is getting worse. New technologies are going  to take our jobs. The world is boiling. The
  4. 0:15zoomers are brain rotted. The boomers are  greedily trying to pad their wallets on the
  5. 0:20way out while somehow being even more brained.  Everything we enjoy is being enshified. Our
  6. 0:25populations are collapsing. People are falling  in love with their AI boyfriends. Every election
  7. 0:31we go into is somehow the most important one  in history. And even if the right side wins,
  8. 0:36we are still ultimately staring down the barrel  of fully automated techno athoritarianism. Or
  9. 0:42a future where your governmentissued non-binary  Chinese EV can only be charged up by bird blending
  10. 0:48homosexual windmills, [music] which as far as  we can tell, absolutely no room in the middle.
  11. 0:54And yeah, I'm joking, of course, but uh also not  really. The question is though, has this kind of
  12. 1:00pessimistic outlook always been so common?  Have the old always rolled their eyes at the
  13. 1:05youths and vice versa? Have we always assumed  that the best times were behind us? Has there
  14. 1:10ever been a society anywhere in human history  that has put their feet up and said, "Actually,
  15. 1:16you know what? We have it pretty good right  now." It's a surprisingly important question for
  16. 1:20a number of reasons. First, there is the simple  irony that despite our seemingly nearly infinite
  17. 1:26capacity to be gloomy doomers, the world has been  getting consistently better for almost everybody
  18. 1:30living in it. Even with inequality as bad as it  is, I would still rather live the life of the
  19. 1:35average person on Earth today than literally  anybody from further back than 200 years ago.
  20. 1:40And the reason this is so important is because  a lot of very smart people have seen this trend
  21. 1:45and found that pessimism about the future  can often end up making that future worse,
  22. 1:50building up a bit of a dangerous feedback loop. So  if this really is the case, should we all just try
  23. 1:55to be a bit more blindly optimistic for our own  good and the good of our economies? Or is there
  24. 2:01a better way to balance the idea that things  could be worse, but we shouldn't stop pushing
  25. 2:06to make them better either? But in the 1980s, many  parents felt lyrics had finally [music] gone too
  26. 2:12far. Well, welcome to the world of Pokemon. It's  the Nintendo game that originated in Japan and
  27. 2:18has American children going crazy. [music] Right  now, we're being evicted from our home. The Khos
  28. 2:22are losing their home to foreclosure. They have  5 [music] days to pack up and move out. You see,
  29. 2:28in Japan, one woman tied the knot with her [music]  AI generated boyfriend in a symbolic wedding
  30. 2:35ceremony. [music] The tech company now offering  buyouts to 60,000 workers. That's more than one
  31. 2:41quarter of its workforce, including people who  work on everything from the Xbox to Windows. Okay,
  32. 2:48so in the simplest possible terms, we are actually  statistically more pessimistic about the future
  33. 2:54right now than we have been in the recent past. In  1999, Pew Research asked Americans whether life in
  34. 3:00their country was better or worse than it had been  50 years earlier. back in the late 40s and early
  35. 3:051950s. Just under half of them said that life was  indeed better in the late 1990s, and only three in
  36. 3:1310 said it was worse. In 2023, Pew asked roughly  the same question. Was life better or worse for
  37. 3:20people like you than it was 50 years ago. But this  time, only 23% said life was better. And in turn,
  38. 3:2858% said it was worse. So again, in the simplest  possible terms, optimism about the future versus
  39. 3:35nostalgia about the past has done a complete  180. It's also worth pointing out that 1999
  40. 3:41was not a completely different world from today.  People were still nervous about what all of this
  41. 3:46business could mean for them and the future of  their livelihoods. There were still arguably more
  42. 3:51moral panics. And it's not like the fundamentals  of human nature have changed over that time. Oh,
  43. 3:56and yeah, I guess another important detail  is that even during a year that in retrospect
  44. 4:01people have collectively agreed on as humanity's  peak, we still couldn't get a majority of people
  45. 4:06to say that life in America was better than the  immediate aftermath of the most destructive war in
  46. 4:11human history. So, I really want you to keep these  findings in mind because we will get back to them
  47. 4:16after a healthy sprinkle of historical nuance.  There are really three reasons why we are so
  48. 4:22eternally pessimistic. two reasons why  that kind of makes us worse off and one
  49. 4:26reason why we probably shouldn't abandon the doom  entirely. So the first and most obvious variable
  50. 4:32is simply just human nature. We have evolved to  be pessimistic because the benefit of a rustling
  51. 4:38bush maybe having a nice tasty snack in it is  not outweighed by the potential risk that it
  52. 4:44might also be a lion. Skittishness about perceived  threats is how we avoided being lunch. Of course,
  53. 4:52these hardwired lessons generally translate very  poorly into modern societies where the risks often
  54. 4:58are actually worth taking for much bigger rewards.  But old habits die hard. One of the longest
  55. 5:04stretches of survey data ever stitched together  on the subject found what we realistically already
  56. 5:08knew. Adam Mastroyani and Daniel Gilbert drew on  177 separate surveys spanning 70 years from 1949
  57. 5:17to 2019, reaching about 280,000 Americans. All  of them asking in one way or another about the
  58. 5:25state of moral decline in society. The questions  were things like, "Do you think people in general
  59. 5:31today lead as [music] good lives, honest and  moral, as they used to?" And well, yeah, as
  60. 5:37a shock to basically nobody, most people believed  that society in the past was more upstanding than
  61. 5:43it was in the present. But that perceived rate of  moral decay was pretty much consistent across the
  62. 5:49entire 70-year period, despite some fairly major  historical events in the meantime. Since the
  63. 5:55beginning of this study, the average respondent  has generally and uniformly agreed that society
  64. 6:00started falling apart around about the time that  they were born. and that held true whether they
  65. 6:05were born in the 1950s or the 2000s. Additionally,  as a bit of insight for later, people rated moral
  66. 6:12change among society at large significantly  worse than change amongst the [music] people
  67. 6:16they actually knew. They agreed that their  friends, family, and even their co-workers were
  68. 6:22improving over time, while everybody else outside  of their little tribe was going backwards. Now,
  69. 6:28before anybody in the comments says, "Well, maybe  people have just been getting worse for 70 years,"
  70. 6:34the researchers checked that, too. When a separate  pile of surveys, over a hundred of them, reaching
  71. 6:39more than 4 million people, asked how honest  and moral everybody was right now, rather than
  72. 6:45compared to the past, the answers barely moved  across 55 [music] years. In plain English, whether
  73. 6:51the question was asked in the 1960s or in the  2010s made basically no difference to how honest
  74. 6:57people said everybody [music] was at the time.  They just always said it used to be better. So,
  75. 7:03yes, human nature obviously skews how we see the  world, but fortunately, it skews it in predictable
  76. 7:08ways. After piecing all of this together, the two  researchers proposed what they called the model
  77. 7:14of biased exposure and biased memory. The biased  memory part is easy. We tend to remember the good
  78. 7:20times where in retrospect we already know how  it all turned out and compare them to an uneasy
  79. 7:25present and an uncertain future where there  is natural anxiety about how things could end
  80. 7:30up. But on the other side there is also a bias and  how we get exposed to that negativity in the first
  81. 7:35place. Yeah, of course there is the obvious stuff  like the fact that bad news sells better than good
  82. 7:41news and not many politicians have won an election  by claiming that everything is great right now.
  83. 7:46Let's not change anything. Researchers actually  ran tens of thousands of headline experiments
  84. 7:51on a single news site, covering over a 100,000  different headlines. Every extra negative word
  85. 7:56in a headline got it about 2% more clicks,  and every extra positive word lost it about
  86. 8:011%. [music] Naturally, the people in both of these  businesses perform better when they sell decline
  87. 8:06and fear because again, our monkey brains respond  to that much more strongly. But paradoxically, as
  88. 8:13the world has become wealthier and more advanced  and more connected, we are naturally spending
  89. 8:18more and more of our time exposed to a much wider  group of people. Being able to travel the world,
  90. 8:24see how other people [music] live, or talk to  anybody on the planet instantly is obviously a
  91. 8:28luxury that didn't exist a few generations  ago. But because it has allowed us to see
  92. 8:32people outside of our little groups as the ones  contributing to moral decline, our biases have
  93. 8:38much more of an opportunity to do their thing.  Compare this to more isolated agrarian communities
  94. 8:43where everybody knew everybody and there just  wasn't the same exposure to those other people.
  95. 8:49Of course, it's easy to just immediately jump to  immigrants or people from different cultures here,
  96. 8:53but it applies much more widely than that as  well. Modern technology has made our lives a
  97. 8:58lot more convenient, but it has also exposed us  to the Kardashians, Elon Musk's perpetual stream
  98. 9:04of consciousness, girls, and politicians trying to  be relatable. basically all things that we would
  99. 9:09have had very little access to without it. The  point is if you want to be angry about something,
  100. 9:15there is an endless buffet available to you  right now. Whereas in the past, we were just
  101. 9:20never exposed to nearly as much of it. So the  fact that the world has gotten better over the
  102. 9:25long run has ironically given us the opportunity  to think that it's getting worse. Now, even if
  103. 9:30you didn't know the specifics of the research,  I am sure none of this is a huge shock to you.
  104. 9:35Media leaning on negative stories and moral panics  about other people that are slightly different is
  105. 9:40not exactly unexpected. But what has changed is  how much of these ideas have started to impact
  106. 9:45our ability to actually make a better future for  ourselves as well as for society at large. So it's
  107. 9:51time to learn how business worked to find out how  a society permanently in decline somehow always
  108. 9:56gets better in the long run. For now, Brilliant  just made private tutoring affordable and easy for
  109. 10:03everyone. If you have kids in school, you can now  get them incredible one-on-one support with their
  110. 10:08math schoolwork and make sure they're prepared  for every test. There's no scheduling, no setup,
  111. 10:13and it's a fraction of the cost of traditional  tutoring. Brilliant, the sponsor of this video,
  112. 10:18built a tutor called Cooji that sits right on  your kid's screen and works through problems
  113. 10:23with them [music] step by step. When your  kid gets stuck, Cooji asks guiding questions,
  114. 10:28gives them visual hints, and even sketches right  on screen until the concept actually clicks. It
  115. 10:33covers grade 5 math through college, plus coding.  And it is built with learning experts from places
  116. 10:39like MIT and Harvard. Your kid can even upload  a photo of their homework, and Cooji will walk
  117. 10:44them through it without handing over the  answer. I tried the Pythagoras demo myself
  118. 10:48and when I stalled, Koji drew the squares right  on my screen until the proof finally made sense.
  119. 10:54If I had this in school, I would have been a  completely different student. Click the link
  120. 10:58below or scan the QR code to get started with  Brilliant for free. You can upgrade to premium
  121. 11:02for full tutoring support and unlimited access  to everything on Brilliant. And right now, How
  122. 11:08BusinessWork viewers can save 20% off an annual  subscription at brilliant.org/howbusinessorked.
  123. 11:16Okay, so humans tend to be a bunch of gloomy  goosees and blame society's problems on everybody
  124. 11:22else outside of their immediate circle. It's not  great, but it's also not surprising. The thing is,
  125. 11:27this phenomenon shows up even in good times,  but it gets a lot worse during bad times. Today,
  126. 11:33we are kind of in something of a perfect storm  for perceived decline because in many ways, yes,
  127. 11:38we have things pretty good, but we can also see  that those benefits are not being spread evenly.
  128. 11:43One of the fastest growing splits between groups  is intergenerational animosity. For most of
  129. 11:48history where we have reliable data, young people  were generally more optimistic about the future
  130. 11:53than older people. New technologies helped them  stand out in the job markets and they could see
  131. 11:58that overall things were trending in the right  direction. Older people at the same time fell
  132. 12:03into the usual traps of nostalgia and being less  open to new ways of doing things. Again, pretty
  133. 12:09standard stuff. Even in very recent demonstrabably  bad times like the global financial crisis,
  134. 12:15younger people and especially younger Americans  still maintained a more positive outlook on the
  135. 12:19world. In 2010, with the crisis barely over, 64%  of Americans under 30 told Gallup that their lives
  136. 12:26were going well enough to count as thriving. That  was the highest of any age group in the country.
  137. 12:32Barely more than a third of the over 65s could  say the same. In theory, this kind of made sense.
  138. 12:39Just purely from a personal finance perspective,  a recession early in someone's career obviously
  139. 12:43sucks. But a lot of people figured that eventually  things would work out. Older people who had
  140. 12:48already built up their financial nest egg were  naturally more defensive of any perceived threats
  141. 12:53to it, whether they were real or not. So yeah,  it kind of made sense except that today it's
  142. 12:59completely flipped. When studied, older people  are now significantly more optimistic about the
  143. 13:05economy, the job market, and their own lives. That  same Gallup measure now has the over 65s as the
  144. 13:12most content age group in America at 53% and the  under30s at the very bottom on 44%. Which is the
  145. 13:19biggest fall Gallup has ever recorded for any age  group. Again, we are still collectively a largely
  146. 13:26pessimistic bunch. But young people are now  consistently more pessimistic. In a lot of cases
  147. 13:32now, the good times that people want to go back to  were years that they weren't even alive for. Even
  148. 13:38right here at home, every age group in Britain,  including the ones who weren't even born yet,
  149. 13:43now tells Yuggov that life was better in the  1990s than it is today. They are nostalgic
  150. 13:49for a past they weren't around for. So why is  this happening? More so than ever before, we
  151. 13:55have structured huge parts of our economies around  maintaining the lifestyles of a large and growing
  152. 14:01group of elderly people. Their retirement assets  and their government support must be maintained at
  153. 14:07all costs, all while the burdens fall on younger  people. Now, these kinds of intergenerational
  154. 14:13transfers have of course happened all throughout  history, but never to the same extent. In most
  155. 14:19historical settings, your retirement plan was your  direct descendants. As late as 1880, close to half
  156. 14:26of retired American men were living in a house  with their children or other relatives. By 1990,
  157. 14:31that was down to 1 in 20. And even in most of  those cases, it was a house that they owned
  158. 14:36with their adult kids living with them rather  than them living with their adult kids. Even
  159. 14:41outside for that small little technicality though,  people are naturally more happy to be burdened
  160. 14:46with the financial requirements of looking after  their own parents or grandparents than they are
  161. 14:50to be burdened with a nebulous economic system  that somehow shuffles their tax dollars off to
  162. 14:55an old folks home in Florida. Human nature  naturally accepts things inside our little
  163. 15:01bubble. But perhaps more importantly, another  reason it feels worse is because it is worse.
  164. 15:08The share of the economy going towards older  generations is just a lot higher. The US
  165. 15:13government now spends six times more on people  over the age of 65 than it does to young people
  166. 15:18just starting out. At the same time, the wealth  held by these older people is also a lot higher.
  167. 15:25American households have never been richer than  they are right now with a combined net worth of
  168. 15:29about $196 trillion. And the baby boomers alone  own more than half of it. Americans under 40,
  169. 15:37so statistically most of you own less than 7% of  that where back in 1989 the under 40s of the day
  170. 15:45owned 12%. There is also the perception that the  older generations are benefiting from a lot more
  171. 15:50of the same forces that are hurting young people.  They use an expanding population and an abundant
  172. 15:55supply of cheap energy in the form of fossil  fuels to feather their own nest and left the major
  173. 16:00environmental reforms to the next person. Back  in 1960, when the oldest boomers were still in
  174. 16:06school, there were 5.1 workers paying in for every  one person drawing a social security check. Today,
  175. 16:13there are 2.6. Even things like AI have been  great for retirement portfolios amongst people
  176. 16:18who never plan on working again when compared to  young people looking at the same trends and also
  177. 16:24figuring out that they may never work again  either. Just, you know, not in a good way.
  178. 16:29A Stanford study that went through the records  of the biggest payroll provider in America found
  179. 16:34that employment for 22 to 25 year olds in the jobs  most exposed to AI is now sitting about 19% below
  180. 16:41where it would be if it had just kept pace with  everybody else. While the older workers in those
  181. 16:46exact same jobs haven't fallen behind at all.  Since the industrial revolution, the expectation
  182. 16:52has always been that the next generation in line  would end up wealthier than their parents. And
  183. 16:57outside of a few little hiccups here and there,  it was mostly true. About 90% of Americans born
  184. 17:02in 1940 went on to out earn their parents. For the  ones born in the 1980s, it's a coin flip. Today,
  185. 17:09a lot of people are 40, still living in their  parents' paidoff home. And watching them get
  186. 17:14six times the government support. And I'm not  even exaggerating about the age. The typical
  187. 17:19firsttime home owner in America is now 40 years  old, which is a record. Now, this is also all
  188. 17:26happening at the same time that there is endless  talk about how these systems are eventually going
  189. 17:31to collapse under their own weight. So, they  need major reform or to be rethought entirely,
  190. 17:36which isn't necessarily wrong. But it also means  that a lot of the young people bearing the load
  191. 17:41today can see that they probably won't ever get  to sit in the nice comfy hammock that they are
  192. 17:46helping to hold up all of these years. So, yeah,  remember those pew numbers from the start. In
  193. 17:52that kind of environment, it's easy to see why  people might be more prone to thinking that,
  194. 17:56yeah, in fact, society has declined from where it  was a generation ago. And that's a real problem.
  195. 18:03Even beyond the real social issues that come from  an increasingly burdened young population holding
  196. 18:09up an increasingly spoiled group of elderly  people, this can cause a pretty bad feedback loop.
  197. 18:14Joel Mochir, an economic historian who won the  Nobel Prize just last year, has argued throughout
  198. 18:20his research that belief in progress itself is  needed to actually see that progress in reality.
  199. 18:26He found that societies that were on the verge of  industrializing tended to have a widespread belief
  200. 18:31in progress and in the possibility of improvement.  Or as he put it, imperial China wanted stability
  201. 18:37and internal peace and Europe wanted progress,  which kind of makes sense, especially back then.
  202. 18:43The world was much poorer than it is today, and  people weren't going to invest limited valuable
  203. 18:49resources into new technologies unless they  had some level of optimism. As a completely
  204. 18:54hypothetical example, if your village in 1700 only  had one spare harvest's worth of grain, you only
  205. 19:01hand it over to the weird guy who wants to build  a water pump if you believe that next year can
  206. 19:07actually be better than this one. Otherwise, you  just eat the grain. On the other hand, pessimism
  207. 19:12about the future can often lead to short-term  investing stances or just economic nihilism on an
  208. 19:18individual level. Why invest in some amazing new  technology if nobody is going to be around to use
  209. 19:23it or AI is going to replace it anyway or if you  still won't be able to afford a house? With this
  210. 19:29kind of thinking, it's a lot easier to justify  that a short-term bet on value extraction is a
  211. 19:34better move than a less risky long-term investment  into value creation. Yeah, it probably won't win,
  212. 19:42but it's the only hope people have. Nearly  a third of American adults under 30 now say
  213. 19:48they are either in or getting into sports betting,  prediction markets, or crypto. And when asked why,
  214. 19:55eight in 10 of them said it was because they felt  they were already behind. In turn, it's very easy
  215. 20:01for people to look at statistics like this and  conclude that society is in decline because
  216. 20:05people just want to gamble all day. Either way,  this makes it much harder to actually improve the
  217. 20:10world or your individual circumstances within it,  which in turn makes people even more pessimistic
  218. 20:15about societal progress, which in turn, well,  you get the idea. Another economist, Benjamin
  219. 20:21Freriedman from Harvard, found something similar  when all of this gets taken to the extreme. He
  220. 20:27argued that even the wealthiest nation on earth  puts its democratic values at risk when incomes
  221. 20:32stand still. Being rich does not protect a country  against rigidity and intolerance once its citizens
  222. 20:38lose the sense that they are getting ahead.  In plain English, the perception of progress
  223. 20:44was often more important than [music] the progress  itself. And if people don't feel it, they are much
  224. 20:50more likely to go looking for a group to blame  rather than to go looking for an actual solution.
  225. 20:55This is again perpetuated by media and politics  that can at least pretend to share those biases to
  226. 21:01gain power or viewership. So, can we actually do  anything about any of this? Well, the good news is
  227. 21:08that the perception of progress is actually a lot  easier to guarantee than progress itself. Shifting
  228. 21:13the balance of support slightly more in favor of  young people might be politically hard given how
  229. 21:19much more reliably old people votes, but it would  fix a lot of these problems. Now, to play devil's
  230. 21:24advocate, the standard counterargument here is  that the old people in this story paid into these
  231. 21:29systems for their entire working lives, and they  can't exactly go back to work at 85 to make up the
  232. 21:34difference, which is true, but nobody is talking  about leaving grandma on an ice flow. The point is
  233. 21:40that the balance has drifted a very long way, and  it's drifting further every year. Tipping it back
  234. 21:46would enable people to fill skills gaps and to  start families if they wanted to. Nearly half of
  235. 21:51childless American adults under 50 still say they  want kids. And the most common reason for having
  236. 21:55fewer than they'd like is simply not having enough  money. This would in turn widen out the workforce
  237. 22:00holding up the old folks in the first place. It  would also help to alleviate a lot of the fears
  238. 22:05that we have about an uncertain future. People are  always going to be pessimistic, at least so far as
  239. 22:11we can tell from basically every survey we have  ever done. But today it's particularly bad. Not
  240. 22:16because we are not richer than ever, but because  the wealth hasn't translated into opportunity,
  241. 22:21but giving them opportunity might quell  their pessimism just enough that they end
  242. 22:25up accidentally making the world better in the  process. Or, you know, [music] we could just
  243. 22:30keep on putting fires out as they happen, which  unfortunately is probably much more likely to
  244. 22:35happen. And if you don't believe me, go and watch  this video next to find out why the wealthiest
  245. 22:39people in the world seem to so consistently  try to break the economies that make them rich
  246. 22:44in the first place. And don't forget to like and  subscribe to keep on learning how business worked.

About this transcript

This page contains the full transcript of Has Society Ever NOT Been In Decline by How Business Worked, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,152 words across 246 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.

What you can do with it

Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.

Free YouTube transcript tool

YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.