Has Society Ever NOT Been In Decline — Transcript
Full transcript
- 0:00across the world today. It's obviously a pretty common sentiment. Our society is in decline. It
- 0:06might be a touch pessimistic, but it's also easy to see where people are coming from. Inequality
- 0:10is getting worse. New technologies are going to take our jobs. The world is boiling. The
- 0:15zoomers are brain rotted. The boomers are greedily trying to pad their wallets on the
- 0:20way out while somehow being even more brained. Everything we enjoy is being enshified. Our
- 0:25populations are collapsing. People are falling in love with their AI boyfriends. Every election
- 0:31we go into is somehow the most important one in history. And even if the right side wins,
- 0:36we are still ultimately staring down the barrel of fully automated techno athoritarianism. Or
- 0:42a future where your governmentissued non-binary Chinese EV can only be charged up by bird blending
- 0:48homosexual windmills, [music] which as far as we can tell, absolutely no room in the middle.
- 0:54And yeah, I'm joking, of course, but uh also not really. The question is though, has this kind of
- 1:00pessimistic outlook always been so common? Have the old always rolled their eyes at the
- 1:05youths and vice versa? Have we always assumed that the best times were behind us? Has there
- 1:10ever been a society anywhere in human history that has put their feet up and said, "Actually,
- 1:16you know what? We have it pretty good right now." It's a surprisingly important question for
- 1:20a number of reasons. First, there is the simple irony that despite our seemingly nearly infinite
- 1:26capacity to be gloomy doomers, the world has been getting consistently better for almost everybody
- 1:30living in it. Even with inequality as bad as it is, I would still rather live the life of the
- 1:35average person on Earth today than literally anybody from further back than 200 years ago.
- 1:40And the reason this is so important is because a lot of very smart people have seen this trend
- 1:45and found that pessimism about the future can often end up making that future worse,
- 1:50building up a bit of a dangerous feedback loop. So if this really is the case, should we all just try
- 1:55to be a bit more blindly optimistic for our own good and the good of our economies? Or is there
- 2:01a better way to balance the idea that things could be worse, but we shouldn't stop pushing
- 2:06to make them better either? But in the 1980s, many parents felt lyrics had finally [music] gone too
- 2:12far. Well, welcome to the world of Pokemon. It's the Nintendo game that originated in Japan and
- 2:18has American children going crazy. [music] Right now, we're being evicted from our home. The Khos
- 2:22are losing their home to foreclosure. They have 5 [music] days to pack up and move out. You see,
- 2:28in Japan, one woman tied the knot with her [music] AI generated boyfriend in a symbolic wedding
- 2:35ceremony. [music] The tech company now offering buyouts to 60,000 workers. That's more than one
- 2:41quarter of its workforce, including people who work on everything from the Xbox to Windows. Okay,
- 2:48so in the simplest possible terms, we are actually statistically more pessimistic about the future
- 2:54right now than we have been in the recent past. In 1999, Pew Research asked Americans whether life in
- 3:00their country was better or worse than it had been 50 years earlier. back in the late 40s and early
- 3:051950s. Just under half of them said that life was indeed better in the late 1990s, and only three in
- 3:1310 said it was worse. In 2023, Pew asked roughly the same question. Was life better or worse for
- 3:20people like you than it was 50 years ago. But this time, only 23% said life was better. And in turn,
- 3:2858% said it was worse. So again, in the simplest possible terms, optimism about the future versus
- 3:35nostalgia about the past has done a complete 180. It's also worth pointing out that 1999
- 3:41was not a completely different world from today. People were still nervous about what all of this
- 3:46business could mean for them and the future of their livelihoods. There were still arguably more
- 3:51moral panics. And it's not like the fundamentals of human nature have changed over that time. Oh,
- 3:56and yeah, I guess another important detail is that even during a year that in retrospect
- 4:01people have collectively agreed on as humanity's peak, we still couldn't get a majority of people
- 4:06to say that life in America was better than the immediate aftermath of the most destructive war in
- 4:11human history. So, I really want you to keep these findings in mind because we will get back to them
- 4:16after a healthy sprinkle of historical nuance. There are really three reasons why we are so
- 4:22eternally pessimistic. two reasons why that kind of makes us worse off and one
- 4:26reason why we probably shouldn't abandon the doom entirely. So the first and most obvious variable
- 4:32is simply just human nature. We have evolved to be pessimistic because the benefit of a rustling
- 4:38bush maybe having a nice tasty snack in it is not outweighed by the potential risk that it
- 4:44might also be a lion. Skittishness about perceived threats is how we avoided being lunch. Of course,
- 4:52these hardwired lessons generally translate very poorly into modern societies where the risks often
- 4:58are actually worth taking for much bigger rewards. But old habits die hard. One of the longest
- 5:04stretches of survey data ever stitched together on the subject found what we realistically already
- 5:08knew. Adam Mastroyani and Daniel Gilbert drew on 177 separate surveys spanning 70 years from 1949
- 5:17to 2019, reaching about 280,000 Americans. All of them asking in one way or another about the
- 5:25state of moral decline in society. The questions were things like, "Do you think people in general
- 5:31today lead as [music] good lives, honest and moral, as they used to?" And well, yeah, as
- 5:37a shock to basically nobody, most people believed that society in the past was more upstanding than
- 5:43it was in the present. But that perceived rate of moral decay was pretty much consistent across the
- 5:49entire 70-year period, despite some fairly major historical events in the meantime. Since the
- 5:55beginning of this study, the average respondent has generally and uniformly agreed that society
- 6:00started falling apart around about the time that they were born. and that held true whether they
- 6:05were born in the 1950s or the 2000s. Additionally, as a bit of insight for later, people rated moral
- 6:12change among society at large significantly worse than change amongst the [music] people
- 6:16they actually knew. They agreed that their friends, family, and even their co-workers were
- 6:22improving over time, while everybody else outside of their little tribe was going backwards. Now,
- 6:28before anybody in the comments says, "Well, maybe people have just been getting worse for 70 years,"
- 6:34the researchers checked that, too. When a separate pile of surveys, over a hundred of them, reaching
- 6:39more than 4 million people, asked how honest and moral everybody was right now, rather than
- 6:45compared to the past, the answers barely moved across 55 [music] years. In plain English, whether
- 6:51the question was asked in the 1960s or in the 2010s made basically no difference to how honest
- 6:57people said everybody [music] was at the time. They just always said it used to be better. So,
- 7:03yes, human nature obviously skews how we see the world, but fortunately, it skews it in predictable
- 7:08ways. After piecing all of this together, the two researchers proposed what they called the model
- 7:14of biased exposure and biased memory. The biased memory part is easy. We tend to remember the good
- 7:20times where in retrospect we already know how it all turned out and compare them to an uneasy
- 7:25present and an uncertain future where there is natural anxiety about how things could end
- 7:30up. But on the other side there is also a bias and how we get exposed to that negativity in the first
- 7:35place. Yeah, of course there is the obvious stuff like the fact that bad news sells better than good
- 7:41news and not many politicians have won an election by claiming that everything is great right now.
- 7:46Let's not change anything. Researchers actually ran tens of thousands of headline experiments
- 7:51on a single news site, covering over a 100,000 different headlines. Every extra negative word
- 7:56in a headline got it about 2% more clicks, and every extra positive word lost it about
- 8:011%. [music] Naturally, the people in both of these businesses perform better when they sell decline
- 8:06and fear because again, our monkey brains respond to that much more strongly. But paradoxically, as
- 8:13the world has become wealthier and more advanced and more connected, we are naturally spending
- 8:18more and more of our time exposed to a much wider group of people. Being able to travel the world,
- 8:24see how other people [music] live, or talk to anybody on the planet instantly is obviously a
- 8:28luxury that didn't exist a few generations ago. But because it has allowed us to see
- 8:32people outside of our little groups as the ones contributing to moral decline, our biases have
- 8:38much more of an opportunity to do their thing. Compare this to more isolated agrarian communities
- 8:43where everybody knew everybody and there just wasn't the same exposure to those other people.
- 8:49Of course, it's easy to just immediately jump to immigrants or people from different cultures here,
- 8:53but it applies much more widely than that as well. Modern technology has made our lives a
- 8:58lot more convenient, but it has also exposed us to the Kardashians, Elon Musk's perpetual stream
- 9:04of consciousness, girls, and politicians trying to be relatable. basically all things that we would
- 9:09have had very little access to without it. The point is if you want to be angry about something,
- 9:15there is an endless buffet available to you right now. Whereas in the past, we were just
- 9:20never exposed to nearly as much of it. So the fact that the world has gotten better over the
- 9:25long run has ironically given us the opportunity to think that it's getting worse. Now, even if
- 9:30you didn't know the specifics of the research, I am sure none of this is a huge shock to you.
- 9:35Media leaning on negative stories and moral panics about other people that are slightly different is
- 9:40not exactly unexpected. But what has changed is how much of these ideas have started to impact
- 9:45our ability to actually make a better future for ourselves as well as for society at large. So it's
- 9:51time to learn how business worked to find out how a society permanently in decline somehow always
- 9:56gets better in the long run. For now, Brilliant just made private tutoring affordable and easy for
- 10:03everyone. If you have kids in school, you can now get them incredible one-on-one support with their
- 10:08math schoolwork and make sure they're prepared for every test. There's no scheduling, no setup,
- 10:13and it's a fraction of the cost of traditional tutoring. Brilliant, the sponsor of this video,
- 10:18built a tutor called Cooji that sits right on your kid's screen and works through problems
- 10:23with them [music] step by step. When your kid gets stuck, Cooji asks guiding questions,
- 10:28gives them visual hints, and even sketches right on screen until the concept actually clicks. It
- 10:33covers grade 5 math through college, plus coding. And it is built with learning experts from places
- 10:39like MIT and Harvard. Your kid can even upload a photo of their homework, and Cooji will walk
- 10:44them through it without handing over the answer. I tried the Pythagoras demo myself
- 10:48and when I stalled, Koji drew the squares right on my screen until the proof finally made sense.
- 10:54If I had this in school, I would have been a completely different student. Click the link
- 10:58below or scan the QR code to get started with Brilliant for free. You can upgrade to premium
- 11:02for full tutoring support and unlimited access to everything on Brilliant. And right now, How
- 11:08BusinessWork viewers can save 20% off an annual subscription at brilliant.org/howbusinessorked.
- 11:16Okay, so humans tend to be a bunch of gloomy goosees and blame society's problems on everybody
- 11:22else outside of their immediate circle. It's not great, but it's also not surprising. The thing is,
- 11:27this phenomenon shows up even in good times, but it gets a lot worse during bad times. Today,
- 11:33we are kind of in something of a perfect storm for perceived decline because in many ways, yes,
- 11:38we have things pretty good, but we can also see that those benefits are not being spread evenly.
- 11:43One of the fastest growing splits between groups is intergenerational animosity. For most of
- 11:48history where we have reliable data, young people were generally more optimistic about the future
- 11:53than older people. New technologies helped them stand out in the job markets and they could see
- 11:58that overall things were trending in the right direction. Older people at the same time fell
- 12:03into the usual traps of nostalgia and being less open to new ways of doing things. Again, pretty
- 12:09standard stuff. Even in very recent demonstrabably bad times like the global financial crisis,
- 12:15younger people and especially younger Americans still maintained a more positive outlook on the
- 12:19world. In 2010, with the crisis barely over, 64% of Americans under 30 told Gallup that their lives
- 12:26were going well enough to count as thriving. That was the highest of any age group in the country.
- 12:32Barely more than a third of the over 65s could say the same. In theory, this kind of made sense.
- 12:39Just purely from a personal finance perspective, a recession early in someone's career obviously
- 12:43sucks. But a lot of people figured that eventually things would work out. Older people who had
- 12:48already built up their financial nest egg were naturally more defensive of any perceived threats
- 12:53to it, whether they were real or not. So yeah, it kind of made sense except that today it's
- 12:59completely flipped. When studied, older people are now significantly more optimistic about the
- 13:05economy, the job market, and their own lives. That same Gallup measure now has the over 65s as the
- 13:12most content age group in America at 53% and the under30s at the very bottom on 44%. Which is the
- 13:19biggest fall Gallup has ever recorded for any age group. Again, we are still collectively a largely
- 13:26pessimistic bunch. But young people are now consistently more pessimistic. In a lot of cases
- 13:32now, the good times that people want to go back to were years that they weren't even alive for. Even
- 13:38right here at home, every age group in Britain, including the ones who weren't even born yet,
- 13:43now tells Yuggov that life was better in the 1990s than it is today. They are nostalgic
- 13:49for a past they weren't around for. So why is this happening? More so than ever before, we
- 13:55have structured huge parts of our economies around maintaining the lifestyles of a large and growing
- 14:01group of elderly people. Their retirement assets and their government support must be maintained at
- 14:07all costs, all while the burdens fall on younger people. Now, these kinds of intergenerational
- 14:13transfers have of course happened all throughout history, but never to the same extent. In most
- 14:19historical settings, your retirement plan was your direct descendants. As late as 1880, close to half
- 14:26of retired American men were living in a house with their children or other relatives. By 1990,
- 14:31that was down to 1 in 20. And even in most of those cases, it was a house that they owned
- 14:36with their adult kids living with them rather than them living with their adult kids. Even
- 14:41outside for that small little technicality though, people are naturally more happy to be burdened
- 14:46with the financial requirements of looking after their own parents or grandparents than they are
- 14:50to be burdened with a nebulous economic system that somehow shuffles their tax dollars off to
- 14:55an old folks home in Florida. Human nature naturally accepts things inside our little
- 15:01bubble. But perhaps more importantly, another reason it feels worse is because it is worse.
- 15:08The share of the economy going towards older generations is just a lot higher. The US
- 15:13government now spends six times more on people over the age of 65 than it does to young people
- 15:18just starting out. At the same time, the wealth held by these older people is also a lot higher.
- 15:25American households have never been richer than they are right now with a combined net worth of
- 15:29about $196 trillion. And the baby boomers alone own more than half of it. Americans under 40,
- 15:37so statistically most of you own less than 7% of that where back in 1989 the under 40s of the day
- 15:45owned 12%. There is also the perception that the older generations are benefiting from a lot more
- 15:50of the same forces that are hurting young people. They use an expanding population and an abundant
- 15:55supply of cheap energy in the form of fossil fuels to feather their own nest and left the major
- 16:00environmental reforms to the next person. Back in 1960, when the oldest boomers were still in
- 16:06school, there were 5.1 workers paying in for every one person drawing a social security check. Today,
- 16:13there are 2.6. Even things like AI have been great for retirement portfolios amongst people
- 16:18who never plan on working again when compared to young people looking at the same trends and also
- 16:24figuring out that they may never work again either. Just, you know, not in a good way.
- 16:29A Stanford study that went through the records of the biggest payroll provider in America found
- 16:34that employment for 22 to 25 year olds in the jobs most exposed to AI is now sitting about 19% below
- 16:41where it would be if it had just kept pace with everybody else. While the older workers in those
- 16:46exact same jobs haven't fallen behind at all. Since the industrial revolution, the expectation
- 16:52has always been that the next generation in line would end up wealthier than their parents. And
- 16:57outside of a few little hiccups here and there, it was mostly true. About 90% of Americans born
- 17:02in 1940 went on to out earn their parents. For the ones born in the 1980s, it's a coin flip. Today,
- 17:09a lot of people are 40, still living in their parents' paidoff home. And watching them get
- 17:14six times the government support. And I'm not even exaggerating about the age. The typical
- 17:19firsttime home owner in America is now 40 years old, which is a record. Now, this is also all
- 17:26happening at the same time that there is endless talk about how these systems are eventually going
- 17:31to collapse under their own weight. So, they need major reform or to be rethought entirely,
- 17:36which isn't necessarily wrong. But it also means that a lot of the young people bearing the load
- 17:41today can see that they probably won't ever get to sit in the nice comfy hammock that they are
- 17:46helping to hold up all of these years. So, yeah, remember those pew numbers from the start. In
- 17:52that kind of environment, it's easy to see why people might be more prone to thinking that,
- 17:56yeah, in fact, society has declined from where it was a generation ago. And that's a real problem.
- 18:03Even beyond the real social issues that come from an increasingly burdened young population holding
- 18:09up an increasingly spoiled group of elderly people, this can cause a pretty bad feedback loop.
- 18:14Joel Mochir, an economic historian who won the Nobel Prize just last year, has argued throughout
- 18:20his research that belief in progress itself is needed to actually see that progress in reality.
- 18:26He found that societies that were on the verge of industrializing tended to have a widespread belief
- 18:31in progress and in the possibility of improvement. Or as he put it, imperial China wanted stability
- 18:37and internal peace and Europe wanted progress, which kind of makes sense, especially back then.
- 18:43The world was much poorer than it is today, and people weren't going to invest limited valuable
- 18:49resources into new technologies unless they had some level of optimism. As a completely
- 18:54hypothetical example, if your village in 1700 only had one spare harvest's worth of grain, you only
- 19:01hand it over to the weird guy who wants to build a water pump if you believe that next year can
- 19:07actually be better than this one. Otherwise, you just eat the grain. On the other hand, pessimism
- 19:12about the future can often lead to short-term investing stances or just economic nihilism on an
- 19:18individual level. Why invest in some amazing new technology if nobody is going to be around to use
- 19:23it or AI is going to replace it anyway or if you still won't be able to afford a house? With this
- 19:29kind of thinking, it's a lot easier to justify that a short-term bet on value extraction is a
- 19:34better move than a less risky long-term investment into value creation. Yeah, it probably won't win,
- 19:42but it's the only hope people have. Nearly a third of American adults under 30 now say
- 19:48they are either in or getting into sports betting, prediction markets, or crypto. And when asked why,
- 19:55eight in 10 of them said it was because they felt they were already behind. In turn, it's very easy
- 20:01for people to look at statistics like this and conclude that society is in decline because
- 20:05people just want to gamble all day. Either way, this makes it much harder to actually improve the
- 20:10world or your individual circumstances within it, which in turn makes people even more pessimistic
- 20:15about societal progress, which in turn, well, you get the idea. Another economist, Benjamin
- 20:21Freriedman from Harvard, found something similar when all of this gets taken to the extreme. He
- 20:27argued that even the wealthiest nation on earth puts its democratic values at risk when incomes
- 20:32stand still. Being rich does not protect a country against rigidity and intolerance once its citizens
- 20:38lose the sense that they are getting ahead. In plain English, the perception of progress
- 20:44was often more important than [music] the progress itself. And if people don't feel it, they are much
- 20:50more likely to go looking for a group to blame rather than to go looking for an actual solution.
- 20:55This is again perpetuated by media and politics that can at least pretend to share those biases to
- 21:01gain power or viewership. So, can we actually do anything about any of this? Well, the good news is
- 21:08that the perception of progress is actually a lot easier to guarantee than progress itself. Shifting
- 21:13the balance of support slightly more in favor of young people might be politically hard given how
- 21:19much more reliably old people votes, but it would fix a lot of these problems. Now, to play devil's
- 21:24advocate, the standard counterargument here is that the old people in this story paid into these
- 21:29systems for their entire working lives, and they can't exactly go back to work at 85 to make up the
- 21:34difference, which is true, but nobody is talking about leaving grandma on an ice flow. The point is
- 21:40that the balance has drifted a very long way, and it's drifting further every year. Tipping it back
- 21:46would enable people to fill skills gaps and to start families if they wanted to. Nearly half of
- 21:51childless American adults under 50 still say they want kids. And the most common reason for having
- 21:55fewer than they'd like is simply not having enough money. This would in turn widen out the workforce
- 22:00holding up the old folks in the first place. It would also help to alleviate a lot of the fears
- 22:05that we have about an uncertain future. People are always going to be pessimistic, at least so far as
- 22:11we can tell from basically every survey we have ever done. But today it's particularly bad. Not
- 22:16because we are not richer than ever, but because the wealth hasn't translated into opportunity,
- 22:21but giving them opportunity might quell their pessimism just enough that they end
- 22:25up accidentally making the world better in the process. Or, you know, [music] we could just
- 22:30keep on putting fires out as they happen, which unfortunately is probably much more likely to
- 22:35happen. And if you don't believe me, go and watch this video next to find out why the wealthiest
- 22:39people in the world seem to so consistently try to break the economies that make them rich
- 22:44in the first place. And don't forget to like and subscribe to keep on learning how business worked.
About this transcript
This page contains the full transcript of Has Society Ever NOT Been In Decline by How Business Worked, generated from the public captions YouTube serves with the video. The transcript has 4,152 words across 246 segments, with the original timestamps preserved so you can click any line to jump to that moment in the embedded player.
What you can do with it
Use the transcript to take notes, quote the speaker, build a study guide, generate a summary with ChatGPT or Claude via the YouTube Summary tool, or export it as a timed subtitle file with YouTube to SRT. You can also re-open it in the transcriber to choose a caption track available on the video.
Free YouTube transcript tool
YouTube2Text is a free YouTube transcript generator — no signup, no daily limit. Paste any YouTube link and get the full transcript instantly, with timestamps, click-to-jump, caption language selection, AI prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, or Markdown.